Military Review

F-15EX Eagle II fighter and its place in the US Air Force

46

First F-15EX under construction, July 2020


Tactical development processes aviation The US Air Force leads to interesting results. Despite the presence of two fighters of the current 5th generation and a project of a fundamentally new aircraft, the Pentagon intends to purchase a large number of modernized F-15EX Eagle II machines. These aircraft formally belong to the previous 4th generation, but they will have to serve in the foreseeable and distant future.

The problem and its solution


At the moment, the fighter aircraft of the US Air Force has a specific composition. The armament consists of four types of equipment and seven modifications. The oldest aircraft were built at the turn of the seventies and eighties, and the last deliveries of modern technology took place this year.

The task of fighting for air superiority is assigned to the F-15C / D / E fighters, built before the beginning of the 22s, as well as to the newer F-15A. According to The Military Balance, the Air Force has about a hundred older F-220C / Ds and approx. 15 newer F-22E. The number of combat-ready F-165A is estimated at 140 units. The National Guard has about 15 F-20C / D and 22 F-XNUMXA.


The same aircraft in factory tests, February 2021.

At the same time, the state of the fighter fleet leaves much to be desired. The F-15C / D are outdated morally and are close to depleting a resource, and the F-22A was discontinued 10 years ago. A full replacement with the necessary capabilities in the form of a promising NGAD fighter is expected in the troops only by the end of the decade.

Other Air Force and National Guard fighters, such as the old F-16C / D or the newer F-35A, are highly effective as front-line bombers, but have limited capabilities as fighters of conquest and dominance. In addition, the F-16C / D are facing obsolescence, and the production of modern F-35A is behind the desired schedule.

The current state of affairs in the field of supremacy fighters in the Pentagon is considered unacceptable and requires urgent action. In 2018, Boeing proposed to the US Air Force a deep modernization project for an existing aircraft called the F-15X, with a focus on counter-air capabilities.


Taking into account the current situation, the Air Force approved this proposal with reservations, as a result of which Boeing received orders for the full development of the project and the subsequent construction of equipment. The new version of the old aircraft was designated F-15EX. Not so long ago, it was given the name Eagle II - by analogy with the basic modification.

Plans and work


In July last year, the Pentagon and Boeing signed a framework contract for the serial production of advanced F-15EX. Its total cost reaches $ 22,9 billion, and the supply of equipment will be carried out until 2030. Earlier it was reported that the Air Force plans to purchase 144 new aircraft. In later the news, which have not yet received official confirmation, there are already 200 units. technology.

Simultaneously with the framework contract, an agreement was signed for the production of the first "small" batch (LRIP) of eight fighters, costing approx. $ 1,2 billion. The first two were planned to be delivered to the customer no later than Q1 2021. The rest are expected by FY2023. The first batch is intended for testing by Air Force specialists. After its delivery, full-fledged mass production will begin with the aim of re-equipping combat units.


First F-15EX during official presentation, April 2021

The first F-15EXs are being built at the Boeing plant in St. Louis. The lead aircraft of the first batch was completed at the beginning of this year, and on February 2, it performed its first flight. Factory tests took about a month, and on March 10, the car was officially handed over to the customer. The next day, she flew to Eglin airbase and became part of the 40th test squadron, which will have to carry out all the necessary checks before putting the equipment into service.

It is reported that the re-equipment of combat units of the Air Force of the Armed Forces and the National Guard will begin in 2024-25. With the new F-15EX, the Eagle II will replace the outdated C and D F-15s. It should be recalled that the total number of such equipment in the army reaches 240 units. Accordingly, future purchases of 144 to 200 new Eagle IIs will not allow for a quantitatively equivalent retrofit. However, it will be possible to compensate for the numerical losses through qualitative growth.

Foreign orders may appear in the future. So, at the end of February, Boeing was allowed to participate in an Indian tender for the purchase of a modern fighter jet. Whether the F-15EX will be of interest to the Indian Air Force will become known later. If successful in the US and India, the new Eagle II can count on the attention of other countries.


The aircraft is being tested in the 40th squadron, May 2021.

Benefits and Limitations


In fact, the F-15EX fighter is a temporary measure, with the help of which they plan to solve one of the urgent problems of the Air Force. As often happens, such a solution turns out to be a compromise, and provides not only advantages, but also limitations. Judging by the official statements, the Pentagon understands this and is ready to make certain "sacrifices" to solve the existing problems.

The F-15EX fighter for the US Air Force was developed on the basis of the F-15QA project, previously created for Qatar. The Eagle II differs from the previous modifications by an improved airframe with a service life of 20 thousand flight hours. Conformal fuel tanks were used, providing an increase in range and combat radius. The updated composition of radio-electronic equipment of open architecture is used. To improve the basic combat qualities, a modern radar with an AFAR of the AN / APG-85 type is being introduced.

The developer claims that the upgraded aircraft is compatible with a wide range of existing and future aircraft weapons. Depending on the assigned missions, the F-15EX will be able to carry up to 22 air-to-air missiles on the external sling. In addition, it provides for the possibility of attacking ground targets. In this case, the fighter will be able to use ammunition up to 22 feet (6,7 m) long and 7000 pounds (3,8 tons), incl. hypersonic weapon.


Being a development of an old aircraft, the modern F-15EX is not inconspicuous, which is considered a disadvantage and imposes certain restrictions. Eagle II will not be able to work effectively in areas covered by enemy air defenses. Its use over foreign territory will be possible only after the preliminary destruction of anti-aircraft systems by other aircraft, such as the F-35A.

However, not only the new F-15EX but also the older F-15C / D / E face the problem of visibility and limited combat value. At the same time, the modern Eagle II has a number of technical and combat advantages over its predecessors. The expected benefits are expected to outweigh any drawbacks.

Past and Future


In the distant past, the US Air Force planned to acquire hundreds of 5th generation F-22A fighters and, with their help, replace the aging F-15C / D / E. Due to this, they were going to create a large fleet of air superiority fighters with some capabilities to attack ground targets. However, for obvious reasons, the purchases of the F-22A were sharply reduced, and less than 200 of these machines arrived in the unit - which did not allow the replacement of the old F-15s.


Air refueling as part of tests, May 2021

Further processes of building aircraft and updating the Air Force were also not distinguished by simplicity and high speed, as a result of which serious problems have accumulated to date. The solution for them had to be sought not in new projects, but in the field of modernization of old aviation equipment. It was another modification of the old fighter - the F-15EX Eagle II.

Taking into account the F-15EX project, plans for the further development of American combat aviation look quite interesting. It is proposed to continue full-scale production of the F-35 of all modifications for various branches of the military, including the Air Force. In parallel, the Air Force and the National Guard will build a new F-15EX on the old platform. And until the end of the current decade, the Air Force will receive new equipment of only these types - until the serial NGAD appears.

Thus, the Pentagon still found a way out of the difficult situation that has been forming in recent decades. Overly ambitious plans to transfer the Air Force to "technology of the future" were not fully realized, and now we have to return to the previous generation of fighters. With all the limitations and possible reputational losses, this step allows you to get rid of a number of technical risks and reduce the threat to further rearmament of the Air Force.
Author:
Photos used:
Boeing, US Air Force
46 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Jacket in stock
    Jacket in stock 30 June 2021 05: 14
    +14
    Here is a kind of long article, but there is nothing to read. Empty walking around the bush.
    If only the main performance characteristics were given for decency.
    1. Lech from Android.
      Lech from Android. 30 June 2021 05: 58
      -8
      Well, why ... we can conclude that the miraculous and omnipotent invisible F-35 did not justify themselves, and now the US Air Force is returning the old, good and proven F-15 to service ... the old people will still show themselves.
      1. bya965
        bya965 30 June 2021 06: 05
        -1
        The AN / APG-85 super duper radar for the old man and the F-35 remains terribly expensive under AWACS.
      2. Jacket in stock
        Jacket in stock 30 June 2021 06: 22
        +6
        Quote: Lech from Android.
        we can conclude that the miraculous and omnipotent invisible F-35 did not justify themselves,

        Well, like bum, these are planes for different tasks.
    2. knn54
      knn54 30 June 2021 09: 18
      +7
      "Clean" fighter to work in conjunction with the F-35
      The airframe, avionics, and armament have been improved, and the result is quite a decent machine.
  2. Maks1995
    Maks1995 30 June 2021 06: 37
    +6
    Yes, that's right, an empty long article ...
    It is annoying that the authors are constantly running around F35, and the silence is that this is a small bomber,
    and forgetting that F22 has not been produced for a long time, tk. he's overly high-tech ...
    1. El Chuvachino
      El Chuvachino 30 June 2021 11: 10
      -5
      Excessively high-tech ... lol
    2. Usher
      Usher 1 July 2021 00: 10
      0
      Quote: Max1995
      Yes, that's right, an empty long article ...
      It is annoying that the authors are constantly running around F35, and the silence is that this is a small bomber,
      and forgetting that F22 has not been produced for a long time, tk. he's overly high-tech ...

      on the contrary, it is low-tech. Manufacturability is simplicity. At least google the term.
      1. Maks1995
        Maks1995 1 July 2021 08: 51
        0
        And .... if so, I take your word for it .... about Google.
        Yandex, it turns out, is blatantly lying ...

        Silicon and sticks - high technologies)))). Good associations
        1. Usher
          Usher 1 July 2021 20: 27
          0
          Quote: Max1995
          And .... if so, I take your word for it .... about Google.
          Yandex, it turns out, is blatantly lying ...

          Silicon and sticks - high technologies)))). Good associations

          The level of technology and manufacturability are not synonymous. The same Tiger tank was low-tech compared to the T-34. Although the level of technology was slightly higher. At least for the same transmission.
          1. Maks1995
            Maks1995 1 July 2021 23: 42
            0
            I believe!)))
            Yandex lied about the word "high-tech"))))
            1. Usher
              Usher 2 July 2021 03: 21
              0
              Quote: Max1995
              I believe!)))
              Yandex lied about the word "high-tech"))))

              Why are you grimacing at me here? Now, if you don't understand https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology or https://kartaslov.ru/value-words/technological
              1. Maks1995
                Maks1995 2 July 2021 07: 09
                0
                Oh, thanks.
                I see
                1) you clearly want to offend
                2) in the open, replace the word "high-tech"

                And at first they seemed so worthy ...
      2. Keen100
        Keen100 4 August 2021 12: 09
        0
        Manufacturability is not simplicity.
        Manufacturability. A set of properties of a product design that determine its adaptability to achieving optimal costs in production, maintenance and repair for given quality indicators, production volume and work conditions.
        GOST 14.205-83 Manufacturability of product design.
  3. ramzay21
    ramzay21 30 June 2021 07: 05
    +4
    In fact, the two-seater F-15EX is replacing the IB F-15E, this is an analogue of our Su-30SM and Su-34, and in terms of the number of suspension points it is the record holder in its class.
    1. Shopping Mall
      Shopping Mall 30 June 2021 08: 07
      +5
      Quote: ramzay21
      In fact, the two-seater F-15EX is replacing the IB F-15E, this is an analogue of our Su-30SM and Su-34, and in terms of the number of suspension points it is the record holder in its class.


      Interestingly, what should be the outfit of the air defense forces in order to repel the blow of four F-15EX carrying missile defense systems, decoys and planning guided bombs to the maximum?
      1. Bad_gr
        Bad_gr 30 June 2021 10: 09
        -8
        Quote: AVM
        Interestingly, what should be the outfit of the air defense forces in order to repel the blow of four F-15EX carrying missile defense systems, decoys and planning guided bombs to the maximum?

        One S-400 complex has the ability to overwhelm all 4 aircraft before they enter the zone of use of their weapons (meaning that they can be hung on all pylons at once)
        1. Bad_gr
          Bad_gr 30 June 2021 12: 22
          -6
          Quote: Bad_gr
          One S-400 complex

          How annoying these minus players who lack intelligence for arguments are.
          At the S-400, the boundaries of the coverage zone in range start at 400 km. How far can a small fry fly away, which can be hung on the entire F-15EX harness at once? The longest-range F-15EX missile is the AIM-120D with a range of up to 180 kilometers, which is half that of the R-37 (they are equipped with the Su-35, I will not talk about the S-400 missiles at all).
          If I am wrong where, I will be grateful for the amendments.
          1. Alexey RA
            Alexey RA 30 June 2021 13: 11
            +9
            Quote: Bad_gr
            At the S-400, the boundaries of the coverage zone in range start at 400 km.

            And if you take into account the radio horizon? wink
            1. Bad_gr
              Bad_gr 30 June 2021 13: 20
              -3
              Quote: Alexey RA
              And if you take into account the radio horizon?

              If the plane flies very low, of course, it will be found not 600 km away, but somewhere closer, but what can be hung on the entire suspension has a scanty range, especially if it is thrown from a very low altitude. And everything long-range has the appropriate dimensions and dimensions and you can't hang a lot of this on an aircraft.
          2. ramzay21
            ramzay21 30 June 2021 23: 30
            0
            At the S-400, the boundaries of the coverage zone in range start at 400 km.

            Its long-range missiles can fly 400 km, the only question is that this requires external target designation, because standard radars can detect targets up to the radio horizon. For this, it is necessary to patrol in the C400 coverage area of ​​AWACS aircraft, and we can say that we do not have them.
            And if the F-15EX is tasked with attacking the C400, then they will not fly at maximum altitude and will not send their exact coordinates to the C400 calculation, no need to expect that there are fools there.
            They will go to PMV, as in Yugoslavia, with radars operating in passive mode, their AWACS planes flying 600 km from our positions will illuminate the air situation for them, launch missiles from 70-100 km, and turn around undetected and go to the base. And our S400 regiment, with all its desire, will be able to fire only 80 targets, and if there are not 15 but, say, 4 F8EX aircraft, then even at a minimum they will be able to fire 176 AIM120s, and that's it, our regiment is gone.

            For effective air defense, air defense systems are not enough, their task is to finish off those targets that were not shot down by interceptors, as an independent system without aviation, it is not effective. To fully cover the areas, an air defense system is needed, which includes the S400 / 350 air defense missile system and the Pantsir air defense system, AWACS aircraft and fighters, in our case the Su-35, or better the Su 57.
            It is already difficult to penetrate such a system, then the AWACS aircraft will detect targets and give target designation either to long-range S400 missiles or fighters, and the same S400 will be able to operate at full range, without restrictions by the radio horizon, and put 80 aircraft only with the help of air defense systems, plus our interceptors will be able to at least still work out the same amount and they have not yet entered the launch zone.
            1. Usher
              Usher 1 July 2021 00: 12
              -1
              Its long-range missiles can fly 400 km, the only question is that this requires external target designation, because standard radars can detect targets up to the radio horizon. For this, it is necessary to patrol in the C400 coverage area of ​​AWACS aircraft, and we can say that we do not have them.
              LOL. Do planes go on the ground?
              1. ramzay21
                ramzay21 1 July 2021 00: 14
                -1
                LOL. Do planes go on the ground?

                If flying an airplane at altitudes less than 15 meters is news to you, then educate yourself so as not to write nonsense here.
                1. Usher
                  Usher 1 July 2021 00: 16
                  0
                  Quote: ramzay21
                  LOL. Do planes go on the ground?

                  If flying an airplane at altitudes less than 15 meters is news to you, then educate yourself so as not to write nonsense here.

                  Less than 15 meters, what is the range at this altitude? I know that it is enough to fly below 50m. And then just 15 meters, the supports will not hurt? lol Don't tell me, okay? Judging by what you write, you need education. ChAO.
        2. Shopping Mall
          Shopping Mall 30 June 2021 13: 19
          +7
          Quote: Bad_gr
          Quote: AVM
          Interestingly, what should be the outfit of the air defense forces in order to repel the blow of four F-15EX carrying missile defense systems, decoys and planning guided bombs to the maximum?

          One S-400 complex has the ability to overwhelm all 4 aircraft before they enter the zone of use of their weapons (meaning that they can be hung on all pylons at once)


          If there is no air support, then the aircraft can use the terrain to attack. In addition, one should not confuse the maximum theoretical range and the real one, which can be influenced by electronic warfare means. In addition, missiles for hitting targets for 400 km are more focused on hitting "large" targets, such as AWACS aircraft, tankers, etc.

          Attacking aircraft can go at an ultra-low altitude, release false targets in advance in order to provoke the air defense system to open fire and waste ammunition. Then go under the cover of electronic warfare, make a jump from the launch range and release the PRR, then again go to the ultra-short to the launch range of the remaining guided munitions.
          1. Bad_gr
            Bad_gr 30 June 2021 18: 48
            -1
            Quote: AVM
            Attacking aircraft can go at an ultra-low altitude, release false targets in advance in order to provoke the air defense system to open fire and waste ammunition.
            What false goals are we talking about? Give a link to the source of this information.
            The article is written
            ... The F-15EX will be able to carry up to 22 air-to-air missiles on the external sling.
            That is, when it approaches, it will immediately shoot down 22 of our aircraft (well, let it be 11, two missiles for each), since our stationary electronic warfare systems are much inferior to those on the F-15 aircraft, and our stationary air defense systems will only catch a glimpse of the plane when he had already shot aimed.
            I correctly understood the meaning of what you wrote?
            .... In addition, it provides for the possibility of attacking ground targets. In this case, the fighter will be able to use ammunition up to 22 feet (6,7 m) long and 7000 pounds (3,8 tons), incl. hypersonic weapons.
            Apparently the same will hang on each pylon.
            1. OgnennyiKotik
              OgnennyiKotik 30 June 2021 20: 13
              +5
              Quote: Bad_gr
              What false goals are we talking about?

              Funny. You don’t know about such a trifle, but you start talking about something.
              For example, old people MALD. They are 2 times lighter than the AIM-120.

              The same ancient AGM-88 HARM is used against the radar. Count 2 AIM-120s by weight.

              In order to use them unnoticed by ground-based radars, the F-15 needs to fly at low altitudes (200-1000 m), not even at extremely low altitudes. I am simply silent about more modern systems.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. Bad_gr
                Bad_gr 30 June 2021 20: 47
                -1
                Quote: OgnennyiKotik
                Funny. You don’t know about such a trifle, but you start talking about something.
                For example, old people MALD. They are 2 times lighter than the AIM-120.
                It is impossible to know everything, and comments with links close the gaps in knowledge, so I see no sin in my reasoning. Although on 4 of my comments I received a bunch of minuses and only one comment with specific information. The efficiency is not very ...
                PS
                By the way, the kit of our Vityaz air defense complex, for example, includes an electronic warfare machine, which, among other things, deals with the interference of enemy electronic warfare, and removes these interference from the radars of the complex itself, so that they do not interfere with the operation of the complex. goals.
                1. OgnennyiKotik
                  OgnennyiKotik 30 June 2021 21: 04
                  +4
                  Everything is more complicated. The principle of air defense without AWACS aircraft and fighters can only complicate the work of aviation. More distracting from other goals than actually protecting.
                  "Air Defense Forces are like pubic hair: they cover, but they don't protect."
    2. Andy J.
      Andy J. 30 June 2021 08: 10
      0
      Not really. First of all, he is going to replace the F-15C. Despite the two-seat cockpit, in combat squadrons where EX will replace C, the rear cockpit will be empty.
      Rumor has it that it is also possible to replace the F-15E with an EX, but that will be much later. IS is much younger in terms of glider than fighters.
    3. parma
      parma 30 June 2021 09: 08
      +3
      Quote: ramzay21
      In fact, the two-seater F-15EX is replacing the IB F-15E, this is an analogue of our Su-30SM and Su-34, and in terms of the number of suspension points it is the record holder in its class.

      Yes and no ... the Su-34 and F-15E have similar ideas of creation (a drummer based on a serial fighter), but a different concept ..
      The duckling, according to the initial idea, is a bomber that does not need cover for fighters, but due to our concept (and, accordingly, the developed weapons), those games from defense when controlling the skies by air defense forces, support on the front end is better provided by attack aircraft ... this created an opinion around the Su-34 that this is an airplane suitcase without a handle (these are suspended side-by-side containers and small orders from both our Ministry of Defense and other countries) ...
      The F-15E is fully consistent with the American concept - it is an aircraft that must support the advancing ground forces at any opportunity - and the aircraft / helicopter to drive / shoot down and knock out ground targets with pinpoint strikes ...
      The F-35 concept is good at the beginning of the conflict, when the air defense is not suppressed, but later, when the enemy has almost no air defense, an aircraft is needed that will carry many large bombs and missiles to hunt for single aircraft, firing points and armored vehicles ...
      1. ramzay21
        ramzay21 30 June 2021 23: 41
        -1
        Yes and no ... the Su-34 and F-15E have similar ideas of creation (a drummer based on a serial fighter), but a different concept ..

        In general, I agree that the F15E is more like the Su 30SM than the Su 34
  4. Shopping Mall
    Shopping Mall 30 June 2021 08: 09
    +1
    The United States often likes to conduct tests in which one F-35 "takes out" 30 F-16 or Su-30MKI, it would be interesting to watch the "fight" of the F-35 vs. F-15EX, F-35 vs. F-22, F-22 vs. F-15EX. It would give a clear understanding of how critical stealth is at the current level of avionics development. With the use of available electronic warfare tools on all machines, of course.
    1. outsider
      outsider 24 September 2021 09: 07
      0
      - All this has been perfectly clarified in the course of many different exercises, large and small ... And "the goat understands" that as a fighter, the F-22 will be in first place here, the F-35 in the second, the F-15EX in the third , - ALWAYS. By their properties.
  5. El Barto
    El Barto 30 June 2021 08: 54
    -6
    Boeing is such a Boeing. This is not the first time they have been seen in corruption with the Pentagon. So it's not a fact that this is not another drank of the budget for kickbacks with a zilch at the exit.

    "... The former chief financial officer for Boeing pleaded guilty in federal court Monday to illegally helping Darleen Druyun, the Air Force's former No. 2 procurement official, land a lucrative job with the company ...

    ... In court papers, Sears admitted meeting with Druyun to discuss employment with Boeing while she was still serving as one of the Air Force's top contracting officials. In that job, Druyun held enormous influence over the service's nearly $ 30 billion annual procurement budget, and was key negotiator in a controversial deal for the Air Force to lease tanker aircraft from Boeing.

    Druyun admitted in federal court last month to favoring Boeing in at least four contract negotiations, including the tanker deal. She said she felt indebted to the company for giving her daughter, her son-in-law and herself jobs. Druyun was sentenced to nine months in prison.

    Last week, the Pentagon announced it would review all contracts Druyun oversaw from 1993 to 2002 as the Air Force's principal deputy assistant for acquisition and management ... "
  6. Then
    Then 30 June 2021 11: 15
    -5
    a wonderful plane for India to replace the aging dryers!
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 30 June 2021 13: 13
      +2
      Quote: Then
      a wonderful plane for India to replace the aging dryers!

      Exactly! But not as a replacement, but in addition - it is necessary to expand the variety of aircraft models of the Indian Air Force in the zoo. smile
  7. Mustached Kok
    Mustached Kok 30 June 2021 17: 30
    +1
    I'm afraid all 5th generation aircraft projects will run up against the limitations of the power plant. Reminds the period of the 40s of the last century. There were many concepts and prototypes of aircraft of the new generation, but they all lived a short life, truly new, a generation in which a completely new type of power plant was used - a jet engine. Aircraft were actively developed, up to generation 4+, while the development of jet engines was enough. But in the late 80s, they began to approach the physical limitations of these engines. Now in the course of development, nothing fundamentally breakthrough is being created. Only systematic gains in percentages, or even fractions of a percent. We need a new type of engine to deliver the 5th generation reference.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 1 July 2021 22: 34
      +2
      Rested in the capabilities of the pilots, and not in the capabilities of the engines.
      Why increase the engine power if the pilot cannot withstand the overloads?
      First you need to remove a person from the cockpit and teach the unmanned fighter to fight
      offline.
      1. Mustached Kok
        Mustached Kok 1 July 2021 22: 57
        0
        Also an interesting idea worth considering. But I think that the engine is more important. Improving piloting by completely replacing the pilot with a computer will really complicate the defeat of the Somallet. But rockets in and out (especially of the coming generation) are already sanitary enough to hit such somals. But the new engine (up to a hybrid one that allows you to fly at near-space heights) will allow developing new tactical and strategic techniques that are already capable of dramatically changing air battles.
  8. motorized rifle
    motorized rifle 30 June 2021 18: 03
    0
    Not mine, but I agree.

    Finally, the ... military-technical failure should include the failure of the modernization programs of the American air ... forces.

    The first stealth aircraft of the fifth generation, the F-22 Raptor, went into production in 1999 and cost US taxpayers an exorbitant price of $ 330 million apiece. Therefore, the program had to be cut by more than fourfold: from 890 to 187 units. Some of these "golden wings" are still flying, but they are already being prepared for decommissioning: the immense cost of operation, combined with the scanty, as it turned out, engine resource, signed the Raptor's death warrant.

    The second "invisible", the long-suffering F-35 "Lightning", which took off in 2006, has already become a symbol of how not to build aircraft. Today, no one can even say roughly how much money went into this failed project. And in 2021, having produced more than 655 copies of this freak, the Pentagon finally admitted the obvious and refused its further purchases, although it had previously assumed to purchase as many as several thousand of such aircraft.

    Now - oh, horror! - The Yankees are forced to follow the path that our Russian aircraft manufacturers took 20 years ago, starting on the basis of the Su-27 the creation of a whole family of 4+ and 4 ++ generation aircraft. Today these aircraft - the Su-30SM, Su-34 and Su-35S - form the backbone of the Russian Air Force's fleet.

    The Americans then smiled indulgently. But in 2021, through clenched teeth, they reluctantly announced that the F-15 heavy fighter, which made its first flight back in 1975, would become the platform for their similar program. So much for the "super-machine of the XXI century"!
  9. Dmitry Izmalkov
    Dmitry Izmalkov 30 June 2021 22: 12
    0
    What kind of radar is this (Apg-85)? I only heard about the APG-82V1.
  10. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 1 July 2021 09: 36
    0
    It is quite logical - the massive F35 is striking and good air defense (here they forgot about the AFAR and the exchange of data and the presence of all V-V missiles) and the F15 EX and an air defense fighter and a load-lifting striker. And against this background, the RF Aerospace Forces - Su34, Su30SM, Su35 (simultaneously produced)
    And we already need a modernized Su35 with AFAR and other pribluds and, finally, with an aiming container.
  11. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 1 July 2021 22: 29
    +1
    200 new F-15s will replace 200 old F-15s that are being decommissioned.
    The new NGAD fighter will gradually replace both the F-22 and the F-15.
    The air force will be based on the F-35. F-16 will be written off.
    The F-18 Superhornet and F - 35S will remain in the Navy. Hornets will write off.
  12. outsider
    outsider 30 August 2021 02: 54
    0
    - Good business review article.
  13. outsider
    outsider 24 September 2021 09: 19
    0
    Quote: Mustache Cock
    I'm afraid all 5th generation aircraft projects will run into the limitations of the power plant. Reminds the period of the 40s of the last century. There were many concepts and prototypes of aircraft of the new generation, but they all lived a short life, truly new, a generation in which a completely new type of power plant was used - a jet engine. Aircraft were actively developed, up to generation 4+, while the development of jet engines was enough. But in the late 80s, they began to approach the physical limitations of these engines. Now in the course of development, nothing fundamentally breakthrough is being created. Only systematic gains in percentage, or even fractions of a percentage. We need a new type of engine that provides a 5th generation reference.

    - What do engines have to do with it? With what hangover did the engine begin to determine - the fifth generation here, or the half-fifth ?! fool Write down for yourself the priority of the properties that define the fifth generation somewhere:
    1. Stealth.
    2. Perfect avionics - airborne radar, RTR station, a complex of electro-optical sensors that provide situational awareness.
    3. High-performance on-board computer network, replacing the pilot with a whole headquarters of military advisers, helping him to solve tactical tasks almost instantly.
    4. High flight performance - and here a perfect engine is desirable. But if it is not there - not scary, see above, for three main factors - it is not the engine that determines the fifth generation ...