Military Review

Lebanese media wrote about the fight for influence in Syria lost by the United States to Russia

33

Bab al-Hawa is the only checkpoint in Syria through which the UN delivers humanitarian aid to the country. Recently, the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN accused the West of "criminal hypocrisy", since representatives of Western states are proposing to keep this checkpoint.


The American side is once again demonstrating complete impotence in Syria. For example, Russia recently launched several airstrikes against militant targets in Idlib province. The troops loyal to Bashar al-Assad, in turn, fired at a Turkish observation post, and this could not have been done without Moscow's consent, Lebanese author Omar Kadur said.

Finally, the Russian navy began military exercises in the Mediterranean, off the coast of Syria. With the US withdrawing its troops from Afghanistan and Iraq and significantly reducing its military presence at bases in the oil monarchies of the Persian Gulf, the Russian contingent in Syria could soon become a much more powerful military force.

It is possible that the dispute over the Bab al-Hawa checkpoint Moscow will also turn in its direction, having achieved, in return for maintaining the point, some regular concessions from the Americans. Everything indicates that the competition in Syria by the West, if not lost, is close to losing.

However, it is possible that Washington simply lost interest in the Syrian issue after a protracted ten-year conflict. Sometimes, after all, the United States also loses and leaves, as it was, for example, in Vietnam in the seventies of the twentieth century.
Author:
Photos used:
Twitter / Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
33 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Iris
    Iris 29 June 2021 10: 14
    +4
    Ahhahaha! Lebanese Media is published on paper purchased with IMF money laughing
    1. Lionnvrsk
      Lionnvrsk 29 June 2021 14: 35
      +2
      Well, let's say Skakuasia generally lives thanks to the money of the IMF. Yes
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Iris
        Iris 30 June 2021 02: 26
        0
        what other skakuasiya? Alternative Globe?
        1. Snail N9
          Snail N9 1 July 2021 07: 01
          0
          The Americans achieved their goal - they destroyed Syria as an integral country, taking all the values ​​out of it, pulled Russia there where it "successfully" spends its resources without receiving anything in return, and even has to butt with Turkey, losing not only materially, but also its authority , because he cannot do anything with the militants covered by the Turks, and that's all, they see it perfectly well. And the war in Syria is far from free for Russia, moreover, with a stagnant economy, galloping inflation and a rapidly poorer population.
          1. Iris
            Iris 2 July 2021 01: 42
            0
            What are the values? What was it in Syria that was worth taking out of there? What is there in general, besides scorpions, the poor population and oil from a gulkin's nose?
            Syria was successfully destroyed by Assad with his idiotic internal political decisions that opened the way for ISIS to the country. Now he sits on our bayonets, freely using the power to order dinner for himself.

            I agree with you regarding the dubious prospects of our presence in Syria.
  2. Marachuh
    Marachuh 29 June 2021 10: 16
    +10
    The entire US military machine is powered by a state corporation! Their # 1 task is to protect these companies and eliminate competitors, and the protection of territories is already secondary! Therefore, the United States should be viewed as a commercial company. They are where it is profitable and you can earn money. At the same time, they forecast for a long time, at the turn of 20-50 years. If the costs and risks exceed the possible benefits, they go away, while trying to get the maximum benefit even from the current situation.
  3. Freemason Mason
    Freemason Mason 29 June 2021 10: 22
    +9
    There is no reason not to trust absolutely unbiased According to Lebanese Media laughing
  4. llsamsonll
    llsamsonll 29 June 2021 10: 28
    +7
    There are no losers there, except for Syria itself. Did the Americans get to the oil reserves? Got it! Have the Russians declared themselves? Declared! Have both weapons been tested? Run in! One thing is not clear what the legacy of the Ottoman Empire is doing there ...
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 29 June 2021 14: 09
      0
      One thing is not clear what the legacy of the Ottoman Empire does there ...

      It is also clear: the Turks wanted to grab a piece of land - they took it ...
  5. Slobodskoy
    Slobodskoy 29 June 2021 10: 52
    -1
    Some stupid article. What "Lebanese media", what checkpoint? What was it for?
  6. iouris
    iouris 29 June 2021 11: 02
    -2
    Did Zakharova say anything about this?
  7. A. Privalov
    A. Privalov 29 June 2021 11: 09
    +1
    Bab al-Hawa is the only checkpoint in Syria through which the UN delivers humanitarian aid to the country. Recently, the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN accused the West of "criminal hypocrisy", since representatives of Western states are proposing to keep this checkpoint.

    Dear Author, you yourself write that this is only point in Syria through which humanitarian aid from the UN is delivered.

    Initially, such deliveries were carried out through four checkpoints - Bab-es-Salam and Bab al-Hawa (on the border of Syria and Turkey), Al-Yarubiya (on the border with Iraq) and Er-Ramta (on border with Jordan) ".

    However, under the insistent demands of Russia and Damascus, the Security Council closed one checkpoint on the border with Turkey. Last July, Russia and China vetoed a proposal to extend aid through two more checkpoints, after which the Council passed a resolution extending operations through Bab al-Hawa alone for a year. He supplies food about three million Syrians.
    What is the "criminal hypocrisy" of the West, which offers to keep the last checkpoint through which millions of Syrians are supplied with food?
    1. Reserve buildbat
      Reserve buildbat 29 June 2021 11: 58
      +4
      It's just that they supply (and not only food) not millions of Syrians, but thousands of ISIS residents.
      1. A. Privalov
        A. Privalov 29 June 2021 13: 31
        +4
        Quote: stock buildbat
        It's just that they supply (and not only food) not millions of Syrians, but thousands of ISIS residents.

        I’m probably the last one who would have bothered about the situation of ISIS scoundrels. However, somehow not humanly, it is realistic to cut off the last source of food supply to millions of civilians, in order to theoretically starve the combatants there.
        Moreover, the topic of closing the checkpoint has been discussed in the UN Council for years, and the supply of ISIS members with weapons by Turkey (you meant this by the word "and not only") has never been raised at such a high level.
        1. aszzz888
          aszzz888 29 June 2021 16: 39
          -1

          A. Privalov (Alexander Privalov)
          Today, 13: 31
          NEW

          +1
          Quote: stock buildbat
          It's just that they supply (and not only food) not millions of Syrians, but thousands of ISIS residents.

          I’m probably the last one who would have bothered about the situation of ISIS scoundrels.
          You are not alone. Your state of ISIS bandits (forbidden in the Russian Federation) gives water, feeds, heals, sends them to a sanatorium ... He sends the treated back on the green ... "He took care" ... angry "Concerned you, ours!" wassat
          1. Nurdom.
            Nurdom. 29 June 2021 17: 11
            0
            Quote: aszzz888

            A. Privalov (Alexander Privalov)
            Today, 13: 31
            NEW

            +1
            Quote: stock buildbat
            It's just that they supply (and not only food) not millions of Syrians, but thousands of ISIS residents.

            I’m probably the last one who would have bothered about the situation of ISIS scoundrels.
            You are not alone. Your state of ISIS bandits (forbidden in the Russian Federation) gives water, feeds, heals, sends them to a sanatorium ... He sends the treated back on the green ... "He took care" ... angry "Concerned you, ours!" wassat

            The Israelis did not hide from anyone that they were treating at their own expense everyone who was brought from the Syrian side to the border hospital, and they helped children and women in labor, and they did not ask the wounded for documents - they treated everyone in a row. Do you blame them for that? They have a state of bandits, but we have solid angels in the flesh? Do you know nothing about the thousands of our compatriots who are fighting on the side of the ISIS, which is prohibited in our country? Gerasimov said four years ago that 2800 immigrants from the Russian Federation were killed in Syria. It only killed 2800, but how many thousands of ours are there in total fighting?
            1. aszzz888
              aszzz888 30 June 2021 05: 13
              -1
              Nurdom.
              Nurdom (Anastasia)
              Yesterday, 17: 11
              .... Do you know nothing about the thousands of our compatriots who are fighting on the side of the ISIS, which is forbidden in our country?
              I know. I know very well.
              But we do not treat them, do not feed them, and do not send them back after resting in sanatoriums. There is a difference?
          2. Iris
            Iris 30 June 2021 02: 23
            +1
            And our state is quite officially training Palestinian militants at the Academy. Frunze. And not on a commercial basis, which would be a financially justified meanness, but at a budgetary expense, which means nothing unjustified meanness.
            1. aszzz888
              aszzz888 30 June 2021 05: 19
              -1

              Iris (Beretta)
              Today, 02: 23
              NEW

              0
              And our state is quite officially training Palestinian militants at the Academy. Frunze.
              Your state is definitely semi-officially supporting the thugov. And OUR trains in / employees from other countries. And if for you they are "Palestinian militants", then it is completely clear to me from whom you are, your companions)) laughing there is enough. I don't hold up anymore.
              1. Iris
                Iris 1 July 2021 11: 12
                +1
                My state is Russia. Yours - I don't know. I sincerely hope that something else.

                But we are not talking about that.
                Whatever you call a militant - you can be a "military man", you can be a "dove-peacemaker" - he will not magically turn into an officer-defender, he will remain a militant. Why should he study at our Academy at the state expense?

                And I will also say - these people are flesh of flesh and blood from the blood of those who blow themselves up on buses (they also have our citizens on their account). Exactly the same as the "shahids" in our metro and those who blew up our houses. And if for you they are "employees from another country", then it is absolutely clear to me from whom YOU are the "party comrade". Mutually do not delay.
        2. Iris
          Iris 4 July 2021 01: 59
          0
          ... in order to theoretically starve the combatants there.


          For the sake of accuracy, Dear Master: illegal - all the same - combatants.
          Sincerely yours, Iris.
          hi
          1. A. Privalov
            A. Privalov 4 July 2021 07: 14
            +1
            Quote: Iris
            ... in order to theoretically starve the combatants there.


            For the sake of accuracy, Dear Master: illegal - all the same - combatants.
            Sincerely yours, Iris.
            hi

            Approx. hi
  8. cniza
    cniza 29 June 2021 11: 36
    +2
    Sometimes, after all, the United States also loses and leaves, as it was, for example, in Vietnam in the seventies of the twentieth century.


    Where and when did they win?
    1. Slobodskoy
      Slobodskoy 29 June 2021 11: 52
      -6
      And where and when did the USSR win after World War II? I'm not talking about the Russian Federation.
      1. nPuBaTuP
        nPuBaTuP 29 June 2021 12: 41
        +3
        08.08.2008 South Ossetia hi
        1. Slobodskoy
          Slobodskoy 29 June 2021 15: 52
          -4
          And, well, yes, against the formidable Georgian army :)))
      2. Alex777
        Alex777 29 June 2021 14: 12
        +1
        And where and when did the USSR win after World War II?

        Vietnam.
        1. Slobodskoy
          Slobodskoy 29 June 2021 15: 52
          -4
          It was Vietnam that won (with Soviet weapons).
          1. Alex777
            Alex777 29 June 2021 16: 21
            +2
            And what happened to the pilots? wink
            1. Slobodskoy
              Slobodskoy 30 June 2021 03: 01
              -6
              Well, there were pilots. But this is such a thing - in 1973, in the Arab-Israeli war, both Soviet pilots and air defense crews fought for the Arabs, and how did it end? The defeat of the Arabs. So, it turns out, we can assume that then the USSR lost this war?
    2. Iris
      Iris 30 June 2021 02: 25
      0
      Desert Storm, for example.
  9. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 30 June 2021 05: 23
    0
    Lebanese media wrote about the fight for influence in Syria lost by the United States to Russia

    crying

    Morphology has not been studied.
    And it will be like this:
    Lebanese media wrote about the US struggle for influence in Syria, lost to Russia.
    hi
  10. Adimius38
    Adimius38 30 June 2021 06: 31
    -2
    Great experts from the Lebanese media laughing The position of the United States in SYRIA is quite strong and they control a part of the oil fields that they are not going to give to anyone. Once the Wagner Magner poked at them, got in the muzzles. There were no more attempts. They don't need Syria so much about their presence in the Mediterranean. They have enough bases in the Mediterranean