Experimental carrier "Poseidon" first went to sea for testing

48 018 79

Illustrative photo

The special-purpose nuclear submarine K-329 "Belgorod" of project 09852 has entered the stage of factory sea trials. According to data voiced by a source in the shipbuilding industry, the submarine went to one of the North fleet.

Reportedly, the experimental carrier of marine drones "Poseidon" first entered the ZKhI in the White Sea on June 25. There is no information about how long this stage will last and how many nuclear submarines are planned to go to sea. "Sevmash" traditionally does not give any comments, writes TASS... At the moment, it is known, again from various sources, that the sea trials of "Belgorod" will smoothly flow into the state ones, and it is planned to transfer the submarine to the customer by the end of this year. According to reports, the submarine will go to serve in the Pacific Fleet.



In April of this year, it was reported that a reactor was launched on the Belgorod submarine, and the submarine was going through a stage of mooring tests. The submarine should complete the tests of the nuclear submarine, including state tests, by September 2021. In addition, it was emphasized that the tests of the nuclear submarine are not associated with the tests of the Poseidons themselves, they are separate.

The multipurpose nuclear submarine Belgorod, launched on April 23, 2019, will be an experimental carrier of the Poseidon drones. The nuclear submarine "Khabarovsk" of project 09851 will be the standard carrier. Earlier it was reported that it is planned to build four carriers of "Poseidons" - two each for the Northern and Pacific fleets. Three of them will be built within the framework of the current state armaments program until 2027, and one more will most likely be built within the framework of the new program.
79 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 17
    26 June 2021 11: 57
    Okay, the dogs are barking, the caravan is coming! good
    1. 0
      26 June 2021 12: 11
      Okay, the dogs are barking, the caravan is on its way

      Something is not audible to our opps, with their sacred - "these are all cartoons filmed at Soyuzmultfilm"))))
      1. -3
        26 June 2021 12: 23
        So they called cartoons not Poseidon, but the avant-garde and a rocket powered by a nuclear engine "melting on Mach 28 Eskimo". By the way, there is little news about the petrel after that incident near Severodvinsk.
        1. PN
          +7
          26 June 2021 13: 12
          And who told you that the Petrel exploded near Severodvinsk? Stop believing journalistic rumors. There was something else.
          1. -4
            26 June 2021 15: 43
            Quote: PN
            There was something else.

            And what was there Oh !? belay
            (Dear, well, do not torment your soul ... open your face ...) bully
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +9
      26 June 2021 12: 20
      At the launching ceremony, the propellers were carefully covered.
      1. + 10
        26 June 2021 12: 58
        They are closed on all slopes and ascents.
      2. +3
        26 June 2021 12: 59
        It turns out that Belgorod is the only one in the world with two water-jet propellers! good
        1. PN
          +6
          26 June 2021 13: 13
          He does not have water cannons, but classic propellers.
          1. +2
            26 June 2021 13: 16
            Well, not quite classic, like the Fulton steamship after the Archimedes propeller broke, but very close, too bad! crying
  2. -9
    26 June 2021 12: 05
    Poseidon carriers are more needed in the Atlantic direction. There, the coast of the United States and Canada is mostly low-lying and you can cause colossal tsunamis, with deep penetration into the depths of the enemy's territory! Why are they in the Pacific Fleet? The coast of the United States is here - grandiose mountain systems, which will, in fact, be an obstacle! For the destruction of some naval bases, other conventional means could well be used. I think (IMHO) - not rational use of funds, based on the characteristics of this product, which were announced !!!
    1. + 13
      26 June 2021 12: 11
      There is no need to try to provoke a discussion. The more bewilderment, the calmer in this particular case.
      1. -16
        26 June 2021 13: 09
        There is no need, hiding behind pseudo-philosophical fabrications, not understanding anything about it, to shut up people! Study performance characteristics, available information, raise your intellectual level and, maybe (but not a fact), you will begin to understand something !!! ! First, look at the map !!! I am a geologist who has more than 45 scientific articles, reports and other works published all over the world .... It is not for you to give me recommendations))))))
        1. + 13
          26 June 2021 13: 18
          Quote: Yuriy71
          I am a geologist who has more than 45 Scientific articles, reports and other works published all over the World ...

          If you are a geologist, this does not mean that you are well versed in the placement of submarines with nuclear torpedoes. You still need to get to the Atlantic Ocean through the Faroe-Icelandic border.
        2. +8
          26 June 2021 15: 15
          Quote: Yuriy71
          I am a geologist, who has more than 45 scientific articles, reports and other works published all over the world.
          Certainly not a trololologist? laughing
        3. +8
          26 June 2021 15: 53
          Quote: Yuriy71
          It's not for you to give me recommendations)

          Mr. geo-LOG, what about the tactics and OI of the fleet? Also, I suppose all the walls are pasted over with works? lol
          Therefore, there is no need to teach people how to live. They have their own life experience and their own views on the combat use of the system, about which nothing is reliably known, except for PR actions.
          By the way, 2M39 is also used against the AMG and against the naval base - too. So it's not a fact that the "tsunami" is the only way to use this wunderwafele. Yes
          AHA.
        4. + 14
          26 June 2021 18: 22
          Quote: Yuriy71
          look at the map !!! I am a geologist who has more than 45 scientific articles, reports and other works published all over the world .... It is not for you to give me recommendations))))))

          When I was sitting on the site in the evening
          A shaggy geologist broke into a branch
          fellow laughing
        5. +3
          26 June 2021 19: 52
          Quote: Yuriy71
          Study performance characteristics, available information,

          A torpedo (Poseidon) with unlimited range can sail around the entire continent to be blown up in the most suitable place for this. And in the Pacific Ocean, try to find a carrier of this very Poseidon (and if you believe the data already published, then a carrier of 6 Poseidons)
        6. +6
          27 June 2021 14: 29
          Yura, you are not a geologist - you are an offended geologist, and I am a retired officer with two upper formations, and I know what to talk about when and what it is better to keep silent about. When I start talking about the structure of the crust in one place or another, signs of minerals outcropping or methods of exploration, you will be able to drive me through the textbooks. And here in this thread it is better to keep quiet about your achievements - they are not in business. Quite the opposite: among scientists there are many freaks with dislocations in everyday life. You and I have different brains, but that doesn't mean yours are better. I wasn't going to offend you, but you just squealed. You shouldn't lose face like that. How do you behave with your subordinates? ..
    2. -1
      26 June 2021 12: 13
      Poseidon carriers are more needed in the Atlantic direction. There, the coast of the United States and Canada is mostly low-lying and you can cause colossal tsunamis, with deep penetration into the depths of the enemy's territory!

      Especially at the mouth of the Mississippi)))
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. + 13
          26 June 2021 13: 23
          listen, geologist, look at the map and tell me where is the Atlantic Ocean and where is Russia. Apparently from the north they will go to the Atlantic. People are sitting there no worse than you.
    3. + 13
      26 June 2021 12: 15
      Quote: Yuriy71
      I think (IMHO) - not rational use of funds, based on the characteristics of this product, which were announced !!!

      Is there a reason to write to the General Staff ... or Shoigu right away? Taking into account the unlimited radius of action, they can send around Cape Horn. But in the Pacific Ocean there is no such anti-submarine curtain. wassat
    4. -19
      26 June 2021 12: 17
      Quote: Yuriy71
      ! Why are they in the Pacific Fleet?

      There is a question and why are they at all.
      No, a carrier for small underwater vehicles is probably needed in principle; some kind of tasks can be thought up.
      But why exactly Poseidons are needed - long-range high-speed torpedoes with a powerful warhead, this is a moot point.
      1. +8
        26 June 2021 12: 29
        Constantine, why do you need eyes? You can hear it so well ...
      2. +9
        26 June 2021 12: 42
        But why exactly Poseidons are needed - long-range high-speed torpedoes with a powerful warhead, this is a moot point.

        Reagan, ask why he started SDI? laughing
        Let the States spend money on protection.
        1. +7
          26 June 2021 16: 03
          Quote: Alex777
          Let the States spend money on protection.

          A very sensible idea, however! (from)
          Colleague, you are right. According to the report of the Pentagon Budget Committee, it is already planned to lay down up to 7 long-range submarine detection vessels, and the Navy has begun designing and R&D of a new SSN (SSN(X)), specifically to combat new underwater threats. These threats, in addition to the newest SSNs/SSGNs, include Poseidon-class UUVs.
          So now they "let them fly" (c) Yes
          1. +4
            26 June 2021 17: 00
            According to the report of the Pentagon's Budget Commission, it is already planned to lay down up to 7 vessels for long-range detection, and the Navy has begun the design and R&D of a new submarine (SSN (X)), specifically to deal with new underwater threats.

            Moreover, all these efforts do not guarantee anything to the States. drinks
        2. 0
          30 June 2021 18: 44
          All our know-how on pl Americans decided with ONE modernized torpedo.
    5. + 11
      26 June 2021 12: 24
      Quote: Yuriy71
      Why are they in the Pacific Fleet?

      California sir, large industrial area
    6. + 15
      26 June 2021 12: 33
      Quote: Yuriy71
      with deep penetration into the depths of the enemy's territory!

      Poseidons are not needed to create a colossal tsunami, Poseidons are needed to destroy the seaports of the United States with the subsequent infection of this territory, because of which the United States will be cut off from the whole world for decades, which will lead to the guaranteed death of the United States as a superpower.
      1. -2
        27 June 2021 10: 33
        You might think we will remain safe and sound Or the bright road to heaven, guaranteed by our leader, warms your soul? So he guaranteed a lot
    7. + 14
      26 June 2021 12: 44
      Why are they in the Pacific Fleet? "

      Then, to explain to the Japanese how to attack Pearl Harbor. By the way, all American SSBNs are based near Seattle - Bangor base. Although Norfolk is closer to Moscow, besides, they are being built there. Again, Japan, China, Australia cannot be very relaxed ... Well, Hollywood, this brainwashing factory, including ours, is also an important goal together with Los Angeles.
    8. +5
      26 June 2021 13: 19
      But what about Japan with its seismic activity, as it is even a shame for the Japanese.
      1. +3
        26 June 2021 17: 03
        And the Japanese are doing badly. If anything, one button is enough for everyone. hi
        1. +1
          26 June 2021 17: 07
          The Japanese today admired the actions of the Provocateur near the Crimea. Even after their enthusiasm, I do not mind Poseidon for them! hi
          1. +4
            26 June 2021 17: 08
            They have a special point.
            1 charge in this place and no Japan.
            And we know that, and they know that we know. bully
            1. +2
              26 June 2021 17: 19
              Hokkaido will either remain, or else it's scary for Vladivostok. drinks
              1. +3
                26 June 2021 17: 21
                Hokkaido will either remain, or else it's scary for Vladivostok. drinks

                Until we press the button, we will not know for sure. wink
                1. +8
                  26 June 2021 22: 10
                  That's right.
                  Underwater earthquakes occur quite often in the world, not far from
                  from the coast. Power equivalent to multi-megawatt nuclear bombs.
                  But tsunamis are extremely rare. Tsunamis are difficult to create artificially.
                  During a tsunami, millions of tons of water rise above the general sea level
                  and slowly fill the coast.
                  An underwater nuclear explosion can cause several high tidal waves.
                  But this is not a tsunami. And these waves will not cause massive destruction on the shore.
                  1. +1
                    26 June 2021 23: 28
                    I respect your opinion, but I can't add anything else to what I have already said.
                    And I have already said a lot. hi
          2. +1
            30 June 2021 18: 46
            You saw Poseidon live, you know, read the test report ?? Otherwise I'm Batman.
    9. +1
      26 June 2021 15: 25
      This is primarily a deterrent weapon. Or did we decide to attack someone?
    10. Aag
      +3
      26 June 2021 18: 17
      Quote: Yuriy71
      Poseidon carriers are more needed in the Atlantic direction. There, the coast of the United States and Canada is mostly low-lying and you can cause colossal tsunamis, with deep penetration into the depths of the enemy's territory! Why are they in the Pacific Fleet? The coast of the United States is here - grandiose mountain systems, which will, in fact, be an obstacle! For the destruction of some naval bases, other conventional means could well be used. I think (IMHO) - not rational use of funds, based on the characteristics of this product, which were announced !!!

      You see, what is the catch, well, there is no Atlantic Fleet in the Russian Navy!))))
      1. Aag
        +2
        26 June 2021 21: 19
        Quote: AAG
        Quote: Yuriy71
        Poseidon carriers are more needed in the Atlantic direction. There, the coast of the United States and Canada is mostly low-lying and you can cause colossal tsunamis, with deep penetration into the depths of the enemy's territory! Why are they in the Pacific Fleet? The coast of the United States is here - grandiose mountain systems, which will, in fact, be an obstacle! For the destruction of some naval bases, other conventional means could well be used. I think (IMHO) - not rational use of funds, based on the characteristics of this product, which were announced !!!

        You see, what is the catch, well, there is no Atlantic Fleet in the Russian Navy!))))

        ... No, I don't mind if we have, say, the Michigan, or, better, the Ontario Red Banner Flotilla ... But so far only the Caspian is available ... (((
  3. +5
    26 June 2021 12: 11
    In good summer weather, the Barents Sea cannot be distinguished from the Black Sea, but the divers were at work that day. Good luck in testing! good
  4. 0
    26 June 2021 12: 16
    Well, okay, it will gradually master its role in the general concept of the Navy.
  5. -19
    26 June 2021 12: 25
    Looking at all these "Poseidons" one gets the impression that the Russian Federation does not know how to calm down a potential adversary in any other way, except with some kind of ba-da-boom.
    1. + 11
      26 June 2021 13: 09
      Quote: Erik
      Looking at all these "Poseidons" one gets the impression that the Russian Federation does not know how to calm down a potential adversary in any other way, except with some kind of ba-da-boom.

      Are you suggesting to persuade, hand out candy, beg and cry?
      1. -15
        26 June 2021 13: 22
        I suggest not to follow the lead of the local bourgeoisie, which with the hands and blood of hard workers in the Russian Federation wants to take its place under the sun! displacing Germany, for example, etc. think carefully before answering.
        1. 0
          26 June 2021 13: 30
          That is The whole world of violence we will destroy
          To the ground
          first, and then
          We are ours, we will build a new world,
          Who was nobody will he become everything? We have already passed this laugh ... hi
          1. -14
            26 June 2021 13: 31
            I don't even know ... Why? Have you destroyed something already? World War I? Not? World War II, also not? Think even better!
            1. -4
              26 June 2021 17: 16
              Wow, how many minuses! :) Painful ...
          2. -1
            29 June 2021 10: 05
            This "giggle" will always be a nightmare in the bourgeois gut.
            1. 0
              29 June 2021 10: 12
              Quote: Essex62
              This "giggle" will always be a nightmare in the bourgeois gut.

              This joke cost Russia tens of millions of lives. Ordinary simple people. The bourgeoisie always manages to escape with money and business abroad. And the new "gentlemen-comrades" begin their deadly harvest.
              1. -1
                29 June 2021 10: 40
                At the turning point they always perish. The goal was worthy. Freedom, equality, brotherhood. The goal was achieved, on the whole. And not all the hangers-on bourgeois with the bloodsucking nobles managed to escape. "In the name of the Revolution for the enemies of the working people..." If you are talking about the current time, then this is no longer relevant. You will be sacked even without the Bolsheviks, by your own upper crust. As soon as the crisis comes.
                1. 0
                  29 June 2021 13: 21
                  Quote: Essex62
                  They always die at the bend. It was a worthy goal. Freedom equality Brotherhood.

                  Are you and all your family and relatives ready to die for this goal?
                  1. -1
                    30 June 2021 08: 37
                    I've already died for her. At 93, when the backbone was thrown around my neck with tank fools. He did not die, but the huckster came.
                    1. 0
                      30 June 2021 09: 31
                      This is demagogy! Are you really ready to give your relatives to death for a "bright idea"? Personally, I don't need such an idea.
                      1. -1
                        30 June 2021 10: 29
                        Where did you see demagoguery? Biography fact. As an honest communist, he tried to prevent the restoration of capitalism in the USSR.
                        So I feel sorry for the grandchildren. But I do not accept the bourgeois power. Dilem.
                        And do not worry you so. Since then, the bourgeoisie have grown wiser. They will not be brought to the situation of 17 of the last century. They will slowly feed you from your hand and pour propaganda into your ears about the advantages of private property. In any case, while the pipe is functioning. And there it will turn out. Maybe you will be the first to climb the barricades when the children have nothing to eat. hi
                      2. 0
                        30 June 2021 15: 01
                        These are not the same "communists" these days! There are plenty of scoundrels climbing to power. I know some of them personally. They will climb to power over the corpses of their compatriots, justifying their actions with the "bright idea of ​​equality!" So, evolution is better than revolution.
                      3. -1
                        30 June 2021 16: 11
                        Who argues? Only in the entire history of mankind no one has ever given away what was acquired fairly. And the world of profit and filthy lucre, by definition, is not capable of evolving towards justice and equality. The world of a predator tearing his own, even if there is no need for it. Modern technologies already allow us to saturate the life activity of all mankind with the necessary product. But capitalism gets in the way. If one person needs, for example, only one car and one home, why the hell does he need 10 Mercedes and three palaces? Do you understand what I mean?
                      4. 0
                        30 June 2021 18: 53
                        Quote: Essex62
                        If one person needs, for example, only one car and one home, what for him 10 Mercedes and three palaces.? Do you understand what I mean?

                        For vanity. There is also the concept of generational capital. Something that exists in the West, which we don't like, and is absent here. My great-grandfather in the Penza province had three sons, three daughters-in-law, he and his wife. Four horses, five cows and land. They all lived under one roof, worked together. They were dispossessed. The Ukrainian grandfather increased his father's inheritance, built a mill on a small river, had to give everything up and move across the country to the Far East, where he was declared an enemy of the people. An illiterate peasant, who was a prisoner during the First World War. And then everything went at a gallop and over bumps ... Mishka, the perestroika of the rayka ..
                      5. 0
                        1 July 2021 08: 55
                        Here everything is more complicated and simpler. No matter what the priests chirp, old Darwin was right. Having stood on two bones, Homo sapiens did not stop being a predator. Dominant. That is why there is a desire to grab and have, to rise, to step on the head of one's neighbor. Brains need to be upgraded. The Bolsheviks did not succeed the first time. There were also immeasurable predators there. With the same motivation, dominant.
                        My seven has a similar story. Great-grandfather to support his family, five girls and a little boy, went to serve in the police. Guards on the streets of Tver. What are they ... city. And of course the enemy of the people. I've been plowing all my life, but here I got fucked up. Exactly before the Revolution, with all that it implies.
                        Civil war is a terrible thing. Our own against our own. I also couldn't imagine that my own from the BO would be imprisoned for me. My brain was boiling from this.
        2. +1
          26 June 2021 13: 36
          And I wonder if such a large boat can go unnoticed into the Atlantic?
    2. CYM
      +3
      26 June 2021 16: 39
      "With a kind word and a gun, you can accomplish much more than just a kind word." (Al Capone). And this character was a great connoisseur of Anglo-Saxon psychology. wink
  6. +3
    26 June 2021 13: 32
    Quote: Erik
    I don't even know ... Why? Have you destroyed something already? World War I? Not? World War II, also not? Think even better!

    You that fell from the sky?
  7. sen
    +8
    26 June 2021 14: 09
    Poseidon is just the first step. The technology of conducting submarine warfare must be revised, this is now being done in Russia and around the world. This opinion was expressed in an interview with a TASS correspondent by the scientific director of the Krylov State Scientific Center (KGNTs) Valery Polovinkin.
    "I believe that the boat of the future is a boat that carries the launching positions. That is, the boat went out - placed the launching position of its weapons, and left."
    https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/11748529
    A similar proposal was discussed in the article "Weapons against aircraft carriers" back in 2004.
    https://disk.yandex.ru/i/GAv0eCNx-JUMZQ
  8. +3
    26 June 2021 15: 09
    Oh, how, it turns out by the end of the year the Russian Navy will receive not two, but three nuclear submarines.
  9. +1
    26 June 2021 18: 22
    An excellent system for bypassing US missile defense.

    Let the United States now live with the feeling that at any moment an unmanned nuclear weapon of enormous power launched at them thousands of kilometers under water could be detonated in their naval bases.
  10. +1
    26 June 2021 18: 56
    * As reported, the experimental carrier of marine drones "Poseidon" first entered the ZHI in the White Sea on June 25. There is no information on how long this stage will last and how many submarine exits to the sea are planned. *
    There can't be any. There will be exactly as many exits as necessary.
    This is how it is done in any country.
  11. -3
    27 June 2021 07: 19
    I just don't understand one thing ..
    Why would a torpedo with an unlimited range need a carrier?
    1. 0
      27 June 2021 12: 04
      Because these are torpedoes equipping a submarine, there are photographs of Belgorod
      and from a different angle
      1. -4
        27 June 2021 14: 11
        I got it .. I don’t get it, Why do these torpedoes have a submarine?
        1. 0
          27 June 2021 18: 20
          what have you read !? -read carefully again, especially the beginning of the article.
        2. 0
          27 June 2021 20: 08
          Yes, because these torpedoes are ammunition, although they have control systems and everything else, but they need a basing place.
          1. -4
            28 June 2021 08: 45
            Duck base at any base and send as needed.
            And the carrier will be constantly under control and sight ...
  12. 0
    27 June 2021 18: 25
    - "At the moment it is known, again from various sources" - I do not like such scribbles, they are very similar to OBS,
  13. Lew
    0
    28 June 2021 11: 06
    any testing of our weapons, it's great ...
  14. 0
    29 June 2021 13: 11
    What are you getting excited about, wealthy moles? Wishful thinking, smeared a bunch of snot, offended the geologist))) The author writes in black and white - Poseidons are a separate topic. They are out of the question. When will this notorious cartoon character appear - a question. I hope the project is real - the machine is not small, theoretically it is possible to shove a small reactor. The algorithm of movement at a depth of 1000m is also theoretically possible to lay, but there are many factors that cannot be taken into account in principle, the most difficult is underwater currents, which can just demolish a torpedo and the whole trajectory - down the drain. Therefore, going around the continents - swamp crap. But straight from Kamchatka - it is quite possible to calculate such a focus plus or minus a kilometer, which, as I understand it, is not critical. However, how it is managed is a big secret. I would do a simple trick: plus or minus the moaning of km to the target according to the algorithm, then it rises to the surface, throws out the buoy, determines the coordinates, the program is updated and forward with the song.
    IMHO Bulava - this is what is real and at the same time cool we have today.