The commander of the destroyer Defender confirmed the opening of warning fire by the Russian ship

166

The British press published comments from the commander of the destroyer HMS Defender, who on the eve carried out an open provocation near the Crimean borders. Recall that the British warship, on board which "accidentally" was a reporter "BBC", violated the maritime borders of Russia in the region of Sevastopol. The Russian Ministry of Defense, reporting the incident, said that the destroyer's crew did not respond to reports of entering Russian waters, and therefore the Coast Guard ship was forced to open warning fire. After a while, there were statements that the Su-24M dropped OFAB-250 bombs along the route of the British Navy destroyer. After a while, the ship left Russian waters.

The British press cites the comments of the commander of the British ship Vincent Owen. A British officer confirmed the information that the Russian ship opened warning fire in the area where the HMS Defender was located. According to Owen, "This is the first time he has come this close to a Russian warship in his 21 years of service."



Vincent Owen:

They opened warning fire. I assume it was done by one of the Coast Guard ships. We did not enter into confrontation, we acted confidently, using the right to continue passage into international waters along the internationally recognized route for free navigation.

At the same time, the statements of the commander of the destroyer "Defender" published by the British media did not say that the Russian bomber carried out the bombing according to his course.

It should be noted that prior to Owen's statements, Britain itself denied opening warning fire, claiming that "the Russians were conducting their exercises."
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    166 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +20
      24 June 2021 18: 27
      Well, now he will begin to tell how he heroically escaped from the encirclement and dumped with his head held high, but in wet pants, not eating salty. Peremoga? And then. Even some laughing Defender, ERRST.
      1. +29
        24 June 2021 18: 39
        Judging by the scheme of the ship's movement presented on our CG, the Briton did not run anywhere and did not even turn around. And he went about not to Cape Fiolent, but cut off the ledge of our territorial waters on its traverse. And he did cut this ledge, without changing the course, entered and left our territorial waters. Yes, our border guards opened warning fire and the plane flew over the ship. But rumors that the Briton drapanul are greatly exaggerated. And we can say that he dumped with his head held high. He completed the task set before him completely.



        And since this provocation was a success, then more serious ones should be expected.
        1. +34
          24 June 2021 18: 51
          The other day the map was with the best magnification, on it, judging by the course of the ship, he caught the tervods with the edge, but then changed his mind and went in the tervods along the border. in such a way that, having changed the course, quickly leave them. I don't think it's worth waiting for something serious, the Brits wanted to check, they checked. The question is how much the bombing along the course of the destroyer cooled the bad heads.
          One thing is for sure, the destroyer was led and ours were waiting for it.
          1. -13
            24 June 2021 20: 01
            Quote: Canecat
            The question is how much the bombing along the course of the destroyer cooled the bad heads.

            by no means, there has already been a statement from the Angles that:
            Quote: British Defense Minister
            nothing will prevent our ships from sailing near the Crimea

            half measures and shouts of this cannot be stopped
        2. +10
          24 June 2021 18: 58
          Let's start with the one whose resource is the marine traffic, you can draw anything. And in general, it is surprising that a warship was displayed there. No one will believe our coastal radar readings. And the atache of Great Britain will be silent, like a fish on ice, which was shown to him in our Ministry of Defense. If we are right, the degree of confrontation will increase. Otherwise, the state border will not be defended. Tomorrow the Ukrainians will trample, well, those by the nostril and into the port. Or you can shoot at the entrance to the tervods.
          1. -10
            24 June 2021 19: 08
            This picture is presented by our own central media, that is, by the official means of Russian propaganda, and not by a blogger-liberal foreign agent.
            1. -1
              24 June 2021 19: 25
              The Ministry of Defense did not give a picture of where to get the news? But they are urgently needed, so such bloopers are taken.
              1. -14
                24 June 2021 19: 35
                The Ministry of Defense is generally silent and does not comment on the incident in any way. It is not clear where the disinformation about the heroic bombing came from.
                1. +10
                  24 June 2021 19: 44
                  This is not misinformation, the first mention of the expulsion came from the Russian Ministry of Defense, with a minute-by-minute timing. A ton of bombs were dropped 9 minutes after the warning fire opened. True, two hours after the expulsion, information passed. It was necessary to watch the reaction of England.
                  1. -6
                    24 June 2021 20: 21
                    Tons of bombs allegedly dropped did not change the course of the foe. This is the main thing, and the timekeeping is slyly silent about the fact that the course of the Angician was not disrupted. And this impudent adversary fulfilled his task. And the Ministry of Defense and the border guards, having allowed the enemy's unhindered passage through our waters, are trying to present themselves as heroes
                  2. +2
                    24 June 2021 23: 02
                    Let's hope that the Ministry of Defense will also draw conclusions, especially about the performance characteristics of the patrolmen.
                2. -10
                  24 June 2021 20: 16
                  So.
          2. -7
            24 June 2021 20: 02
            Quote: tralflot1832
            Our coastal radar readings, no one will believe

            they would first be published, and only after that they will believe it or not
            do you have them?
            or can you give a link to the resource where they are posted, maybe there is a video from the Su-24 ?!
            1. +3
              24 June 2021 20: 47
              The FSB has posted footage of the warning fire.
              1. -6
                24 June 2021 21: 14
                I am absolutely calm, looked, and that lemongrass turned away? !!
                not!!!
                he walked and walked, once again the Angles completed their task by 200%
              2. -9
                24 June 2021 22: 18
                The FSB posted footage of the warning fire.


                Yeah, the Brit didn’t even realize that someone was firing from a fart behind him. Passed the coast guard boat like an express train past a village station.

                And God, well, what poor English your border guards have .... well, they studied right in Tmutarakaniya. Brita choked on tea while hearing about the territorial sea ... laughing

                The correct reference to the Brits would be Dear English ladies! Please get your ass into your hands and GET OUT of my waters or your f @ king ship will be sunk in seconds.
                1. -1
                  24 June 2021 22: 25
                  I even understood English with a Ryazan accent, went in and kicked out. And this is a de facto recognition of the borders. Well, trample on the Sea Breeze exercises to the Crimea. Just grab the pampers. Instead of non-stick suits. The British looked cool in them. Descendants of Nelson, them also to meet with the Chinese in Djibouti.
                2. The comment was deleted.
          3. +9
            24 June 2021 20: 12
            Quote: tralflot1832
            Let's start with the one whose resource is the marine traffic, you can draw anything. And in general, it is surprising that a warship was displayed there. No one will believe our coastal radar readings. And the atache of Great Britain will be silent, like a fish on ice, which was shown to him in our Ministry of Defense. If we are right, the degree of confrontation will increase. Otherwise, the state border will not be defended. Tomorrow the Ukrainians will trample, well, those by the nostril and into the port. Or you can shoot at the entrance to the tervods.


            Vidos appeared.


            And a photo report of a journalist who was at that moment on a British ship. Apparently there was no time for jokes.

            That is, the correspondent confirms that the shelling did take place, although the UK Department of Defense denied this.


            "After the second wave of shelling, I hear a message destined for her captain that we have 'two hard-hitting missiles.' For a second, I wonder what will happen next. Wars started for less."


            ... "I was in the cool, dimly lit destroyer operating room when a Russian radio operator sent the first warning via VHF transmitter: Delta 36 (callsign Defender), change course."
            The crew did not react to this warning in any way, simply ignoring it. None of the 30 crew members in blue overalls, sitting diligently in front of the rows of radio screens, seemed alarmed.

            But when every second red lights began to flash on the monitors (the approach of the enemy), the tension began to build up. Correspondent Mark Nichol realized that "we are poking at the Russian bear."


            .Another warning:

            Delta 36, ​​do not cross the border or I will open fire. Change course. If you cross the road, I will open fire. Your ship is entering the territory of the Russian Federation. We are not responsible if you are hurt. We are participating in military exercises in the area.
            Here the Russian aviation staged its "show" over the destroyer. The British crew realized that they smelled like fried. The captain gave the order to put on "non-stick" balaclavas and gloves. The destroyer's alert level has been raised to "red".


            ... One of the Coast Guard ships began firing.

            “Stay away from us!” The Russian Coast Guard says over the radio.












            https://m.zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5ac5b467256d5c1389817029/nad-golovoi-grohochut-russkie-samolety-nash-ekipaj-gotovit-rakety-podrobnyi-rasskaz-i-fotografii-ochevidca-na-esmince-defender-60d44d9ebec1cf52d2d6bc90
            1. -1
              24 June 2021 20: 15
              It looks like this is not the end of the concert, two obviously non-civilians passed over me. lol
            2. -7
              24 June 2021 20: 27
              A good show for the Air Force about the heroic British sailors. Moreover, in the program "Time will reap", the host Ostashko called the crew's fireproof balaclavas masks worn so as not to recognize the faces of the provocateurs!)))
              Our media portrayed themselves as incompetent, and the British made full use of the incident.
              1. +2
                24 June 2021 20: 31
                Leading Ostashko called the crew's fireproof balaclavas masks worn so as not to recognize the faces of the provocateurs!)))

                Maybe the masks were hiding faces from the 95th block, led by Ze? laughing
                1. -5
                  24 June 2021 20: 50
                  It's a pity I can't open the telegrams, the FSB posted a movie. Thanks for the schedule.
              2. 0
                26 June 2021 11: 16
                Something very old has become, very bad. Insanity crept up.
            3. -2
              24 June 2021 22: 54
              sitting in these stupid hats, they are afraid of getting burned after a missile strike)
              1. kig
                +5
                25 June 2021 03: 34
                These things have been worn on a battle alert, since WWII. And yes, they must protect against burns.
            4. +3
              24 June 2021 23: 10
              There is another video where the watchdog is clearly inferior in high-speed performance characteristics, let's hope that the correct conclusions will be drawn from this
              1. +1
                25 June 2021 10: 37
                There is another video where the watchdog is clearly inferior in high-speed performance characteristics, let's hope that the correct conclusions will be drawn from this

                Unfortunately, the normal PSKR, which were carried on board the GAS, had depth charges and gun mounts caliber 76 mm, plus they had excellent speed, and the ships of the Albatross project were decommissioned. Instead of them, the coast guard forces receive floating hotels, which are 1. huge 2. practically do not carry normal weapons and, in the event of a real escalation at sea, are unable to perform tasks to protect the BP 3. have a low cruising speed in the economic mode of travel due to diesel power plants., and also boats are coming, in which all the weapons are in the crew's small arms and, perhaps, the only machine gun.
            5. kig
              +6
              25 June 2021 03: 33
              Here is the article that Zen seems to be referring to:
              https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9718661/Read-dramatic-eyewitness-report-Vladimir-Putin-gunboat-opens-fire.html

              and here are excerpts from there, which do not fully confirm the fact of firing at the destroyer:
              - when Defender increased his speed and pulled away, the border guards went on the radio again: Delta 36, ​​do not cross the border or I fire. Change your course. If you cross, I fire. Your ship is entering the territory of the Russian Federation. We do not take responsibility if you are damaged. We are engaging in a military exercise in this area. - mention of some kind of military exercises in the area. Here the question is immediately: about such exercises, navigational warnings are issued in advance with the coordinates of dangerous areas. Was there such a warning about exercises in the Crimea region? I doubt that most likely the border guards took it out of fear. But let's go further: then a report from observers on the port side upper deck reaches the bridge: 'Gunfire heard to the stern!' - the observer reports the shooting heard from the stern. A curious correspondent runs to the deck and hears two more bursts there. Further: Only the Russian sailors know for certain who they were firing at or in what direction. But given their exasperation at being unable to persuade Defender to change its course, we were a likely target, albeit we were out of range - that is, no consequences from the shooting are observed, it is not clear where they were shooting, and the destroyer, which was most likely the target, has long been out of reach.

              There is a photo of the Su-24 which is said to have dropped four bombs to deter the Royal Navy vesselwho is said to have dropped four bombs on the destroyer's course. But there is no video showing these bombs falling and exploding.

              Here again the question arises: the correspondents managed to film everything in the world, but did not notice any shooting (something was, but very far away, and it is not clear who was shooting where), nor the fall of shells on the course, nor even the explosions of bombs, which were very overlooked. difficult. The destroyer commander, by the way, only mentioned the shooting, but said nothing about the shells, let alone the bombs, bursting along the ship's course. By adding: I was comfortable we were out of range of its guns as we were traveling at 30 knots to their 21... Given that the passage of the destroyer through the disputed waters was clearly planned in advance, such inattention is completely incomprehensible. Most likely, a whole team of specialists had to work on board at this moment, who would record everything.

              Well, not everything is clear from our side either. If the British say that nothing happened, is it really reluctant to anyone to catch them in a lie? Really, neither the pilots, nor the sailors recorded the fact of shooting and dropping bombs? At least to show that the destroyer was not hit and was not damaged.
              1. 0
                25 June 2021 18: 06
                They were shooting from afar. Not surprisingly, many did not notice this:
                https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9724697/Russia-warns-Britain-defend-borders-using-possible-means-including-military.html
                1. kig
                  0
                  26 June 2021 03: 54
                  Yes, I finally watched the FSB video, here's a shot of the actual shooting



                  Unsurprisingly, the British didn't notice. From this position, it is almost impossible to put shells on the course. In vain they published, now London has direct evidence that no one really fired at them.

                  Now look at the video of the bombing
                  1. 0
                    26 June 2021 14: 56
                    Yes, shooting from such a caliber, they could have taken for a salute in their honor!
          4. +2
            24 June 2021 20: 44
            If they don't want to believe our coastal radar. So they will trust the drivers who will examine the sunken ships in the territorial waters of the Russian Federation
            1. -1
              26 June 2021 14: 53
              Drivers do not inspect anything underwater laughing
              1. 0
                26 June 2021 15: 26
                Not funny, it's just "autocorrect", smart people understood this
          5. 0
            25 June 2021 17: 57
            Here's a map from the English Daily Mail:

            https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9718661/Read-dramatic-eyewitness-report-Vladimir-Putin-gunboat-opens-fire.html?ito=rcreplyemail
            Here's the shooting:
            https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9724697/Russia-warns-Britain-defend-borders-using-possible-means-including-military.html
        3. +18
          24 June 2021 19: 07
          laughing we do not know exactly how the Briton wanted to go, he could, in principle, pass almost at the very coast at a distance of 5 km, but after the warning, he began to make maneuvers, and then went further south, did not scramble, but "go along the coast" - not passed ..
          1. -10
            24 June 2021 20: 43
            They did not change the course - this is a fact. A shockproof maneuver, perhaps made - they are a plus. Completed the task - praise.
            And it's time for us to stop making laudatory hats ..
            The Turks shot down our plane for a second flight through their airspace - serious guys. And we have almost half an hour of walking the violator, without changing the course, along our waters, propaganda passes off as our success.
            As the saying goes, the comparison is not in our favor
            1. +1
              24 June 2021 22: 02
              and he had to turn around? the task was to expel him from the waters, he wanted to go near the coast, did not pass ... About the Turks, are you not tired of sissy crushing? The Turks paid in fact for this 12 lard bucks, 1 helicopter, several tanks, several dozens of soldiers and officers, including the flyers of that very unit .. You must always answer wisely, which ours did .. And leave it to Mikhalkov to throw at the tank with a bayonet.
            2. +6
              24 June 2021 22: 25
              They shouldn't have drowned him. This is not done.
              Under the USSR, the Americans were expelled from our territorial waters on the Black Sea.
              Operation Naval is called this incident.
              Both ships were damaged, but the Americans were more sensitive, their ship was completely new, but it was repaired.
              America tried to make claims and blame the Union.
              They wanted to receive compensation for the repair of their ship, but as a result of all the negotiations, they did not achieve anything and were even forced to declare that they would no longer invade our waters.
            3. +14
              24 June 2021 22: 42
              They did not change the course - this is a fact.

              Of course, I don’t understand that a tanker can be deaf, but not blind.
              THEREFORE I EXPLAIN FOR THOSE WHO IN THE TANK.
              1. If the course is not changed, then the track on the map (in the absence of current) is straight. And here is broken.
              2. There is such a difficult crap for a tanker - the scale. So on this photo the scale is such that the deviation from the straight line along the normal is just over 3 km. Since the defender has sunk 3 km into our waters, this means that he, like a bunny, fulfilled the requirement of the frontier guards and left the tervoda.
              3. If you measure the angle of the course change, it will be about 30 degrees. Again, for a tanker, this is probably a revelation, but for a ship the fastest way to move away from a linear obstacle (coast, border) is not to stop and back away wassat , do not rotate 90 degrees, but just rotate 30-35 degrees.

              So teach a matting tanker.
              And my question is your persistent false comments, is it really because of illiteracy or as the Minister of Agriculture of England for the honor of the crown you are fighting?
              1. +1
                26 June 2021 11: 21
                Excellent! Not an eyebrow, but a blind eye!
          2. 0
            25 June 2021 18: 00
            Here's a map:

            https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9718661/Read-dramatic-eyewitness-report-Vladimir-Putin-gunboat-opens-fire.html?ito=rcreplyemail
        4. -14
          24 June 2021 19: 20
          Powers was shot down, amers were rammed, Boeings were landed (in the 80s) and it was necessary to sink this trough! And all because now children are being trained in military schools, they go chewing snot!
          1. +10
            24 June 2021 22: 03
            Well, you know better, you will ram an 700-strong frigate with a 8-ton patrolman ... yeah, and I'll tell you a secret - dropping a few bombs along the course is more dumb than shoving ..
        5. +14
          24 June 2021 19: 22
          Judging by the scheme of the ship's movement presented on our CG, the Briton did not run anywhere and did not even turn around. And he went about not to Cape Fiolent, but cut off the ledge of our territorial waters on its traverse. And he did cut this ledge, without changing the course, entered and left our territorial waters. Yes, our border guards opened warning fire and the plane flew over the ship. But rumors that the Briton drapanul are greatly exaggerated. And we can say that he dumped with his head held high. He completed the task set before him completely.

          A cat in a village with a mother-in-law can defile absolutely unperturbed past a dog right in 10 cm from the maximum length of the chain. But the trick is that the dog is big and strong and from time to time the carabiner on the collar breaks. If you get the hang of it at the time of the passage of the cat, then you will have to get another cat.
          1. -9
            24 June 2021 20: 31
            Our dog does not bite even with a broken carbine. Not accustomed. If the dog of the front command does not understand and is not accustomed to it, no matter how big it is, it is not dangerous.
            1. +4
              25 June 2021 00: 49
              Why demagoguery lit? A planned provocation, this is the latest destroyer, with powerful weapons and reconnaissance potential! You can't sink him with a single rocket, for this you need to turn on a lot of secret technology, he would have caught it and turned around sharply, having written down gigabytes of useful information fool he himself, I think, did not emit any secret waves No.
              The attack would have buried all the positive from the meeting with Biden. Do you want that?
              They were shown, and then I think they explained to their atache that the overflight of ships can be with bombs on board, which can be suddenly applied without including the entire coastal infrastructure soldier
              This is the first incident, no incident, the second may already end and inadvertently bully
              Let's wait and see how in the future, will walk on the "Ukrainian territorial waters" British valiant Maryachki
            2. 0
              26 June 2021 22: 31
              Quote: Old Tanker
              Our dog does not bite even with a broken carbine. Not accustomed. If the dog of the front command does not understand and is not accustomed to it, no matter how big it is, it is not dangerous.

              Country dogs are usually not trained.
        6. -3
          24 June 2021 19: 34
          drapanul with his head held high, what’s already there. Otherwise, I would have entered the friendly "Ukrainian" Sevastopol.
          1. +5
            24 June 2021 21: 03
            Quote: sifgame
            drapanul with his head held high, what’s already there. Otherwise, I would have entered the friendly "Ukrainian" Sevastopol.

            They simply had to go to Sevastopol at least to lay wreaths at the English cemetery - they also consider it a "Ukrainian city", so it is not clear why the call did not take place. Probably from too "great pride" in their fleet - they are not fools to go to the bottom even because of their traditions ...
        7. +5
          24 June 2021 19: 40
          Quote: Old Tankman
          And since this provocation was a success, then more serious ones should be expected.

          Against the background of providing a loan at good interest to Ukraine for two troughs, which will be repaired and re-equipped, Britain is only gaining in the preservation of jobs, the use of production facilities, etc. The corresponding agreement has already been signed. Independent media present it as an override, where the people will pay the debts. Suckers were bred, but suckers need to be supported in order to continue milking. These are similar "provocations" and will occur. The main thing here for the British is to accentuate the non-recognition of the Crimea by the Russian, and to the non-landowners to be convinced of this. Capitalism, business and nothing else.
        8. +3
          24 June 2021 19: 44
          ........... using the right to continue passage into international waters along an internationally recognized route for free navigation

          To refer to international law at a time when, according to the constitution, the prerogative of the laws of the Russian Federation over international ones is stupid: after all, in the place where it is allowed to be within the framework of international law, within the framework of the laws of the Russian Federation, you can get 4 bombs no longer in front of the ship, but on deck of the ship. They can then prove in an international court that they were right, but the sailors who will be hit will not be any easier from this.
          Who knows, when our government runs out of patience, to explain that the territory of the Crimea and the hedgehogs with it are sea waters, the territory of the Russian Federation. They can slam the door loudly, so that in the future such issues no longer arise.
        9. +1
          24 June 2021 19: 58
          Quote: Old Tankman
          Judging by the scheme of the ship's movement presented on our CG, the Briton did not run anywhere and did not even turn around.

          for this statement yesterday, under thirty minuses grabbed
      2. -3
        24 June 2021 19: 57
        Quote: Captive
        Well, now he will begin to tell how he heroically escaped the encirclement and dumped with his head held high, but in wet pants, not eating salty.

        Well, first of all, "not salty slurp." in this case does not apply to the Angles, they deliberately went to the provocation, carried out everything competently and achieved everything they wanted
        secondly, "but in wet pants" the same is not correct, they were preparing for an attack and no one fought in hysterics, the video is freely available, but most likely they would have gotten on snot if ours in the next run were not limited to half measures, but certainly didn't get shit
      3. -3
        24 June 2021 23: 03
        Quote: Captive
        Well, now he will begin to tell how he heroically escaped from the encirclement and dumped with his head held high, but in wet pants, not eating salty. Peremoga? And then. Even some laughing Defender, ERRST.

        Listen, where do you get this nonsense about wet pants? About sailors who resigned after our plane flew over Donald Cook? The Briton, as he went on a straight course, left. About bombs, except for the statements of our Defense Ministry, there is no other information and confirmation. Do you really think that such an act was not recorded by video filming? Or we are now like 3,14ndos, we have evidence, but we will not show it to anyone. In NATO, soldiers are no more cowardly than our couch warriors. Do not underestimate the enemy. Then you have to pay dearly for this ...
    2. +29
      24 June 2021 18: 35
      Why is our Department of Defense losing the information war? That it is impossible to provide a video of the warning shooting from the ship and the attack of the SU 24 with the bombing of this Brit destroyer? Why give the enemy, and the British obvious enemies, a place for disinformation? Is it really difficult for the "high" general-admiral's authorities to understand that the time has come for the video of wars !? Did you provide proof! Information time. Now it is stronger than a good army.
      1. +6
        24 June 2021 18: 40
        The war in the Western media cannot be won.
        1. +12
          24 June 2021 18: 46
          Quote: tralflot1832
          The war in the Western media cannot be won.

          You need to fight for your former brothers! All over the world, only strength is respected. Strength was shown to the British. So you need to show a picture of the use of force! The time is now, the time of pictures! The British even took the correspondent with them for a picture!
          1. -1
            24 June 2021 18: 49
            Yes, I'm also waiting, so much strength was in the air and at sea.
          2. -3
            24 June 2021 19: 51
            Quote: 30 vis
            All over the world, only strength is respected. Strength was shown to the British.

            Never (!) In this situation, or similar, the British will not be exposed to attack. To prove your strength, excluding such incidents, you must beat for sure and drown, but this requires steel eggs. And the current situation against the background of Europe's "goodwill" for a "dialogue" does not allow this to be done. In this case, there are no winners who is right and who is guilty from the point of view of the parties, it is stupid to judge. But the provocation took place to the "joy" of Ukraine.
          3. -3
            24 June 2021 20: 57
            bibisi will show only what is convenient for them. so it doesn't matter. and they can also turn such cadres against us, as if we provoked aggression in neutral waters. we can sink their ship, but it is possible that after that the United States and Britain will put pressure on Germany and impose serious sanctions on us, up to and including our gas to Europe and disconnection from SWIFT. This will be a very painful blow to our economy, which has been stagnating since 2008 and will not start growing in any way.
        2. +3
          24 June 2021 18: 54
          Quote: tralflot1832
          The war in the Western media cannot be won.

          Why do this in the media? In the most offensive way possible for the British, the edited video, with the appropriate voice acting and comments, should be posted on the Internet - then it will disperse itself.
      2. +3
        24 June 2021 18: 45
        I think if there really is such a video, it will be shown. As was the case with the provocation at the Kerch Strait. And if such a video does not appear, then it does not exist. Which is very strange.
        1. +3
          24 June 2021 18: 49
          Quote: Old Tanker
          I think if there really is such a video, it will be shown. As was the case with the provocation at the Kerch Strait. And if such a video does not appear, then it does not exist. Which is very strange.

          Nothing strange, the usual inertness of the general's thinking ... Completed the combat mission and unhook. They do not want to look wider.
          1. -7
            24 June 2021 18: 54
            Whether oh! With the current fashion for everything to take photos and video reports and send them almost online to the National Defense Control Center, there is hardly such a report on this event, if everything was as they are presented to us, no. And if they did not, then obviously someone will very much receive a hat for it.
          2. -3
            24 June 2021 18: 57
            Completed the combat mission and unhook.
            Completed? or Did you say you did it?
            1. -5
              24 June 2021 19: 09
              That is the question!
            2. -2
              24 June 2021 22: 51
              Completed? or Did you say you did it?

              Well, you do not be assimilated to different ...
              The task in such cases is always the same: to suppress actions to violate the state border.
              The task was completed quickly and competently. Scoreboard score.
              The task of "destroying the intruder" against ships was never set either in the USSR or in the Russian Federation.
              As far as I know, the task of "detaining the intruder" on ships of rank 1-2-3 was not set.
              Simply because it is impracticable - you can sink the destroyer, but only the boat can be detained.
              Well, unless of course it's not a 404 navy laughing
              1. +1
                25 June 2021 05: 44
                Scoreboard score
                Well, now at least a video of the shooting has been posted. So what can I say. Yes, the task was completed.
                1. -1
                  25 June 2021 05: 49
                  The Pentagon doesn't believe it anyway.
                  In the west, they have completely gone crazy.
                2. 0
                  25 June 2021 10: 32
                  So what can I say. Yes, the task was completed.

                  Now that's not the question. They will exactly repeat ...
        2. +9
          24 June 2021 18: 56
          It is necessary to show immediately, hot. And not when everything dies down. If you have something to show.
      3. -4
        24 June 2021 18: 51
        Quote: 30 vis
        Why is our Department of Defense losing the information war? What cannot be provided video warning fire from a ship and a bombing attack by SU 24 on this Brit destroyer? Why give the enemy, and the British obvious enemies, a place for disinformation? Is it really difficult for the "high" general-admiral's authorities to understand that the time has come for the video of wars !? Did you provide proof! Information time. Now it is stronger than a good army.

        ===
        for sure there is, the time will come - they will. or will appear on YouTube soon)
        1. +7
          24 June 2021 18: 53
          Quote: Victorio
          the time will come - they will provide. or will appear on YouTube soon)

          The time has come right away! Fought back, provide a picture. Now is the time for information. Here, too, you need to hit first.
          1. 0
            25 June 2021 02: 59
            Perhaps they are waiting for public comments from the other side, so that they can be presented in the "best light" by presenting their pictures! laughing
            You are not Shary in the information war! negative who lays out all the cards at the beginning of the game? No.
            1. 0
              25 June 2021 11: 29
              Quote: Eroma
              Perhaps they are waiting for public comments from the other side, so that they can be presented in the "best light" by presenting their pictures! laughing
              You are not Shary in the information war! negative who lays out all the cards at the beginning of the game? No.

              In general, do not wait for the slop to be doused. to make excuses, to wash. Better to strike a preemptive strike right away. Bam! And not any card cheating games. it is better
      4. -14
        24 June 2021 18: 52
        Why give the enemy, and the British are clear enemies
        Zakharova, beloved by many here, stubbornly calls the British partners.
        1. -9
          24 June 2021 19: 31
          Zakharova, beloved by many here, stubbornly calls the British partners.

          For "our Psaki" they are partners.
        2. -1
          24 June 2021 20: 41
          but how to call them .. friends?)))
          1. -3
            24 June 2021 21: 30
            but how to call them .. friends?
            Rather, a potential adversary.
      5. +2
        24 June 2021 19: 12
        and who said that ours will not provide? winked
      6. -2
        24 June 2021 19: 35
        That is why we prepare very beautiful slides for the morning videoconference at night.
      7. -7
        24 June 2021 19: 36
        Quote: 30 vis
        That it is impossible to provide a video of the warning shooting from the ship and the attack of the SU 24 with the bombing on this Brit destroyer?

        You cannot provide a video of something that was not in reality.
        1. +1
          24 June 2021 21: 37
          "You cannot provide a video of something that was not in reality."
          However, this is done periodically. The level of computer technology allows. In no way do I want to dispute the information of our media on the topic under discussion.
        2. 0
          25 June 2021 18: 12
          Watch the shooting:
          https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9724697/Russia-warns-Britain-defend-borders-using-possible-means-including-military.html
          1. -3
            25 June 2021 19: 11
            This shooting from this distance is difficult to detect. But her shaves do not deny it. Where is the bombing video ?!
        3. 0
          25 June 2021 18: 14
          Shooting:

          https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9724697/Russia-warns-Britain-defend-borders-using-possible-means-including-military.html
      8. +4
        24 June 2021 21: 04
        . Did provide evidence


        Not posted, so it was not. (C)
      9. +3
        24 June 2021 21: 21
        Smiled. They will coordinate this video for another week laughing
      10. +2
        24 June 2021 22: 45
        And who is in charge of the press and so on in the Moscow region? Snotty dull chicks? Well, that's the result. We do not have smart, thoughtful witches at the top, they are taught long before the promotion to be silent and not to climb, maybe, and so the situation will resolve. Look at our press, I see some incompetent degradants. They don't care what to carry, their eyes are dull, their mouths are salivating, they stand behind a barrier in front of each other, bark, argue about anything. Noise, din, uniform chicken coop with the same intelligence!
      11. KCA
        0
        25 June 2021 04: 13
        And you are funny, well, post a video on YouTube with the SU-24M and the signature - NATO-shit, how many seconds will your video hang? 5-10-15? That's all the information, but if they show it on Russian channels, then immediately "cartoons", "fairy tales" izent it?
    3. -5
      24 June 2021 18: 36
      A year ago he wrote that the old Lizka's fleet uses the Russian innovative software, how everything is intertwined. The Ministry of Defense of England finally commented on the incident, dragged the English Channel here, from the Pas de Calais. But this is a strait, there are several other rules of passage. The US Ambassador arrived in Russia, as it is not casual this mess.
      1. +8
        24 June 2021 18: 47
        Quote: tralflot1832
        The Ministry of Defense of England finally commented on the incident, dragged the English Channel here, with the Pas de Calais. But this is a strait, there are slightly different rules of passage. They are spinning like in a frying pan.

        Yes, we are with you, we know this perfectly well, like no one else, where and how to pass the straits and the waterways. Serious and deliberate provocation, similar to 1941.
        1. +5
          24 June 2021 22: 01
          Quote: tihonmarine
          Quote: tralflot1832
          The Ministry of Defense of England finally commented on the incident, dragged the English Channel here, with the Pas de Calais. But this is a strait, there are slightly different rules of passage. They are spinning like in a frying pan.

          Yes, we are with you, we know this perfectly well, like no one else, where and how to pass the straits and the waterways. Serious and deliberate provocation, similar to 1941.


          It's great to hear from them that Crimea has sailed to its native harbor .. tongue
    4. -3
      24 June 2021 18: 38
      Again "Eya Majesti Fleet" was poked into the cesspool with its nose.
      1. -2
        24 June 2021 18: 47
        It is not evening yet, our Foreign and Defense Ministry did not receive satisfaction. Moreover, the British Defense Ministry was the last to speak, and there heresy in our direction.
    5. +2
      24 June 2021 18: 39
      Both sides are right. Shelling combined with exercises. And the wolves are fed, and the sheep are not sheep.
    6. -2
      24 June 2021 18: 46
      They opened warning fire. I assume it was done by one of the Coast Guard ships. We didn't get into confrontation

      Brechet like Trotsky angry ..And the bombing of aerial bombs along the course of the ship, have the Saxons forgotten about it?
      Now they will begin to dodge, as if they did not hear or see anything .. In short, they turned on the fool again .. But you will have to answer and do not hope that everything will hesitate .. Russia is no longer the one to hush it all up.! Soon again on all cars in Russia Biden oo! And what to do, because they provoke a war.
      1. +2
        24 June 2021 18: 49
        Quote: xorek
        And what to do, because they provoke a war.

        It looks like it has already begun. Pfu, pfu!
        1. +5
          24 June 2021 19: 47
          Quote: tihonmarine
          Quote: xorek
          And what to do, because they provoke a war.

          It looks like it has already begun. Pfu, pfu!

          In the info space since 2000 Vlad ... hi What to do ? It is necessary to clamp the inner fifth column .. This is the most dangerous thing in Russia! They can raise a mutiny, they have no financial problems ..
          1. +1
            24 June 2021 19: 59
            Quote: xorek
            It is necessary to clamp the inner fifth column .. This is the most dangerous thing in Russia! They can raise a mutiny, they have no financial problems ..

            I have written about this many times, but not everyone understands. And now you and I will not be understood.
    7. BAI
      -31
      24 June 2021 18: 46
      At the same time, the statements of the commander of the destroyer "Defender" published by the British media did not say that the Russian bomber carried out the bombing according to his course.

      And in the BBC report it is not.
      The presence of bombing is a huge minus of Russia. An attack on a warship in the territorial waters of another state (Ukraine. After all, Crimea is not recognized by anyone). And from the point of view of international law, the incident took place in UKRAINIAN waters.
      After all, if you wish. it can be used as a pretext for war. I have no doubts that there will be new sanctions on this matter.
      1. +7
        24 June 2021 19: 06
        After all, Crimea is not recognized by anyone).
        Interestingly, many recognized the Malvinas Islands as the Falkland Islands?
      2. -5
        24 June 2021 20: 10
        if they wish for war, they will always find a pretext. There is no international law. waters belong to the state that can protect them (Falklands, Kuril Islands, etc.) An attack on any ship is a reason in any waters. that is why there is no photo of bombing - weak. our billionaires cannot quarrel with the country where their children study. there will be sanctions because "they want to eat"
      3. +1
        24 June 2021 20: 16
        Quote: BAI
        The presence of bombing is a huge minus of Russia. An attack on a warship in the territorial waters of another state (Ukraine. After all, Crimea is not recognized by anyone).

        Sorry, but you need to go to school, and not an ABC book in the toilet to smoke ...By the decree of Catherine II of February 2, 1784, the Tauride region was established under the management of G.A. Potemkin, consisting of the Crimean Peninsula and Taman. The decree said: “... the Crimean peninsula with the land lying between Perekop and the borders of the Yekaterinoslav governorate, establishing a region under the name of Tauride, as long as the multiplication of the population and various necessary institutions will make it convenient to arrange its province, we will entrust it to our general, Yekaterinoslavsky and the Tavrichesky governor-general prince Potemkin, whose feat and our very and all these lands, the assumption was fulfilled, leaving him to divide that region into districts, appoint cities, prepare for opening during the current year, and inform us about all the details related to this and our Senate. "
        1. BAI
          -8
          24 June 2021 21: 19
          Roll up this decree with a tube and go to the toilet. There you belong with this decree. Find more inscriptions on the stone Scythian statues and operate them.
          It's not even serious to discuss.
          1. +1
            25 June 2021 09: 25
            Quote: BAI
            Roll up this decree with a tube and go to the toilet. There you belong with this decree.

            In 2014, the GDP rolled up all the decrees of Yeltsin-Kravchuk-Shushkevich into tubes, poured them down the toilet, and Crimea became Russian again.
    8. +5
      24 June 2021 18: 48
      This crap with a destroyer is very similar to the plane with Protasevich. To bring everything up to the well-known actions when the border is violated. It looks like this is a "lice check".
      1. +3
        24 June 2021 19: 05
        With protosevech, at least there is a showdown in ICAO.
      2. +1
        24 June 2021 20: 18
        Quote: AlexGa
        It looks like this is a "lice check".

        Reading the history of 1941, we see the same picture, and the same actions of Nazi Germany, and the Japanese did not lag behind them.
        1. 0
          25 June 2021 18: 33
          The same provocation was the reason for the Vietnam War.
    9. +5
      24 June 2021 18: 48
      At the same time, the statements of the commander of the destroyer "Defender" published by the British media did not say that the Russian bomber carried out the bombing according to his course.


      That's what they want, they want to play war ...
      1. +3
        24 June 2021 20: 01
        Quote: cniza
        At the same time, the statements of the commander of the destroyer "Defender" published by the British media did not say that the Russian bomber carried out the bombing according to his course.


        That's what they want, they want to play war ...

        Most likely Victor, they have accumulated debts .. Trillions, and how to write off? Naturally looking for someone to play off with Russia and write off EVERYTHING! Anglo-Saxons and others have been living with this for a century .. soldier
        Something like that happens again in history ..
        1. +2
          24 June 2021 21: 08
          Everything repeats itself, before it was easy to write off everything through war, but modern war is already a different process ...
      2. +3
        24 June 2021 20: 22
        Quote: cniza
        That's what they want, they want to play war ...

        Once upon a time the whole world sounded "Rule Britain, rule the seas!" and now the small britain is following the instructions. Uncle Sam turned out to be higher in seniority than "NM".
        Although it may be like this - "Natasha and I go in pairs!"
        1. 0
          24 June 2021 21: 09
          They are working out, patience is not prohibitive ...
    10. +2
      24 June 2021 18: 54
      According to Owen, "This is the first time he has come this close to a Russian warship in his 21 years of service."
      Interestingly, did this freak know that it swam into Russian waters, or was it a revelation for him, after the opening of fire? Why wasn’t you detained for crossing borders? smile Liberators, calmly, just kidding! wink
    11. +6
      24 June 2021 18: 55
      How ours accompanied the Brit from the plane - there is a video. How the Britons filmed our planes - there is a video. But the most spectacular fact - bombing - well, no! How so ??? Are the batteries empty ??
    12. +9
      24 June 2021 18: 58
      Quote: BAI
      The presence of bombing is a huge minus of Russia.

      Well, in my opinion, we have been included in tolerasts for a long time, so I disagree with you on this issue. The Angles understand only strength, they will definitely try to avoid such a second visit, they are not suicides. And if we let it down, the feint would want to repeat the minke whales and all their brothers, so IMHO, ours did everything right.
    13. +5
      24 June 2021 18: 59
      It is indistinct from our side how it happened. Neither is it. Therefore, the continuation will follow fool there are those who wish.
    14. +3
      24 June 2021 19: 19
      Quote: Old Tankman
      And he did cut this ledge, without changing the course, entered and left our ter. waters.
      If you look closely at the course, then small squiggles opposite Sevastopol are visible. But these are small on the map, in reality they were more serious, it is a pity that the tervods were not marked.
    15. +2
      24 June 2021 19: 23
      They did not immediately deny the fact of the shooting.
      They did not confirm the fact of the warning shooting.
      .
      We behaved confidently, did not enter into confrontation and used our right to continue innocent passage through international waters along a recognized shipping route ... We were out of the range of the guns, as we were moving at a speed of 30 knots, while they were at a speed of 21 ",. ..
      Only Russian sailors know exactly at whom and in which direction they fired.
      1. 0
        25 June 2021 18: 40
        Only Russian sailors know exactly at whom and in which direction they fired.
    16. +15
      24 June 2021 19: 36
      We are looking in the wrong direction:
      1. The commander of the destroyer is white!
      2. Not a single Negro or Arab on the bridge!
      3. There are almost no women on the bridge.
      4. There are no explicit LGBT people.
      Here on these points it is necessary to carry them with a muzzle! It will hook them! wink
      And bombs, shooting, territorial waters - they already do not understand this. If only the "echo of war", to tightly and conclusively, where to find a thread winked
      1. +6
        24 June 2021 20: 40
        Quote: engineer74
        1. The commander of the destroyer is white!
        2. Not a single Negro or Arab on the bridge!
        3. There are almost no women on the bridge.

        I support, very correct points, it is necessary to put pressure on the Royal Navy entot euromosol. Yes
        Quote: engineer74
        4. There are no explicit LGBT people.

        How do you imagine that? War paint? bully
        1. +6
          24 June 2021 20: 51
          Quote: Dym71

          I support, very correct points, it is necessary to put pressure on the Royal Navy entot euromosol. Yes
          Quote: engineer74
          4. There are no explicit LGBT people.

          How do you imagine that? War paint? bully

          I can’t imagine it, but it’s not important - highly likely wassat
    17. +2
      24 June 2021 19: 43
      The course of the British warship was most likely originally laid out in order to see the reaction of our FSB of Russia and the Black Sea Fleet, this is a planned action, and our fellows did not blunder and showed their teeth, correctly that they were shooting at the course, there is nothing to spoil their corps in bulk on the enemy
    18. +1
      24 June 2021 20: 03
      Next time to bomb we will send a young pilot instead of a sniper pilot with a large ammunition supply. Let the guy train. For the consequences, you understand, we do not bear the answer, pass it through diplomatic channels to lovers of sea walks.
    19. +2
      24 June 2021 20: 13
      ... The Russian Ministry of Defense, reporting the incident, said that the destroyer's crew did not respond to reports of entering Russian waters, and therefore the Coast Guard ship was forced to open warning fire. After a while, there were statements that the Su-24M dropped OFAB-250 bombs along the route of the British Navy destroyer.

      It was not necessary to throw bombs in front of the ship, like beads in front of pigs.
      We must throw barrels of feces on the deck. Well, they'll break something else "along the way", and figs with him.
      When our plane dropped aviation kerosene onto a pinboard ship, it was quite intelligible to those. Well, you can treat the eternally shitty shaved ones with feces. fellow laughing
    20. 0
      24 June 2021 20: 23
      The colonialists are called uncut. This is not the North Sea or the English Channel.
    21. +1
      24 June 2021 20: 28
      and there is a si breeze ahead .... dear mom !!!
      1. 0
        24 June 2021 23: 21
        "sea breeze" - everything is under the supervision of senior comrades ... the question is, as if the "local" after the dizziness of success did not happen, these are on the "edge", and then they will break
    22. 0
      24 June 2021 21: 14
      The FSB has published a video of a British destroyer in the Black Sea.
      Here is a shot for those who still doubt that we opened warning fire.
      1. +1
        24 June 2021 21: 38
        Punish for the useless waste of ammunition, you do not need to shoot in the air, but along the sides, otherwise no one on the destroyer even understood what was happening.
        1. 0
          24 June 2021 22: 23
          They were shooting not in the air, but ahead of the movement of the British ship.
          1. 0
            25 June 2021 06: 08
            Quote: Serge_
            They were shooting not in the air, but ahead of the movement of the British ship.

            Have you watched the video?
            How could ours shoot in front, if he himself was far behind.
            Our shells could not even reach the impudent ones.
            Where is "ahead" from?
            1. -1
              25 June 2021 11: 19
              Watch the video carefully. Don't write nonsense.
              1. 0
                25 June 2021 12: 05
                Quote: Serge_
                Do not write nonsense.

                I watched the video, the angles were far, far away, only a powerful lens could see them.
                This was much longer than the 30mm cannon's firing range.
          2. -1
            25 June 2021 18: 44
            Shot in the air
            1. 0
              25 June 2021 19: 53
              What are you drinking there? Watch the video - It was clearly and clearly told to fire warning shots AT THE DEFENDER COURSE.
      2. +1
        24 June 2021 22: 21
        Russian border guards acted competently.
        There was a rapprochement.
        But the destroyer had a significant speed advantage.
        And at the moment of warning shots, the border ship had already lagged behind.
        Therefore, the Briton did not understand that they were shooting in his direction.
        1. 0
          24 June 2021 22: 59
          But the destroyer had a significant speed advantage.

          Did not have. It looks like you, too, Alexei, are not friends with the courts.
          1. By the time of the shooting, the defender had already turned into the open sea. But the order to fire had already been given.
          2. A border guard to pass a parallel course is forced to circulate over a larger radius.
          3. The shooting was impossible to miss. Sounds can be heard even on the BBC commercial.
          1. +2
            25 June 2021 01: 14
            ". By the time of the shooting, the defender had already turned into the open sea." ///
            ----
            The defender didn't make any turns. He walked in a straight line at 30 knots.
            The route is visible on maps.

            And for about 3 km he went along the edge for 1.5 - 2 km in
            territorial waters of Crimea.
            Russian border guards abruptly approached rapprochement, starting radio communications,
            demanding that he leave the territorial waters.
            The British announced a military alert.
            While talking, the destroyer went far ahead. They shot after him.
            The British heard the shots, but no longer considered them a threat.
            1. -1
              25 June 2021 10: 36
              The defender didn't make any turns. He walked in a straight line at 30 knots.
              The route is visible on maps.

              You are measuring the wrong area, everything was on purple.
              At this point, the tervod ledge, he would have passed through it.
              But he turned it away. You watch the video from the watchdog and you will understand everything.
              And you mark the point when he has already returned.
    23. -2
      24 June 2021 21: 30
      Well, it cleared up, and you are a crowd of whiners, yes, not that yes, not so, yes, it was not
    24. 0
      24 June 2021 21: 51
      I propose to name the extraordinary naval exercises in the Black Sea "Lord Cardigan" (international notice Earl of Cardigan)
    25. +5
      24 June 2021 21: 53
      For those in the tank, video of negotiations and warning fire:
    26. -5
      24 June 2021 21: 58
      An investigation should be made as to why the intruder was not sunk and what the implications of the violation are for the dignity of the state and for defense. Another humiliation of the state took place, combined with an intelligence operation.
      The answer to the murder of the DPR servicemen has not been given, and Britain has not been given an answer. One should prepare for the consequences of the repetition of similar and other provocations.
      1. +2
        24 June 2021 22: 54
        Another humiliation of the state took place, combined with an intelligence operation.

        Why, in such cases, no one never simply drowns the violator, but it never even occurs to anyone to threaten to sink. Neither the USSR nor the PRC, and it’s scary to think about the United States ...
        1. 0
          25 June 2021 13: 18
          And why, then, the Russian destroyer does not violate the borders of Britain or (scary to say) Great Britain?
          I remember that after such a violation in the same area, the USSR was soon disbanded and the population paid a huge unlimited indemnity, and Poland and Turkey received huge subsidies. And now these Poland and Turkey are preparing to eat off the territories and resources of the USSR.
      2. -3
        25 June 2021 04: 37
        Of course, a nuclear war will not happen for a sunken destroyer (probably), but new sanctions are guaranteed, as well as the status of an aggressor. Do we need it?
        Logic nothing - show-off - everything?
        We did everything that was necessary and did the right thing, right down to warning shots.


        And what about a DPR serviceman? This is a serviceman of a republic that is not part of the Russian Federation. These are not our problems.
    27. 0
      24 June 2021 22: 14
      I think that it was necessary not to escort, but to detain.
    28. -2
      24 June 2021 22: 19
      In the British headquarters, it becomes known that the Russian president has ordered the next nuclear strike to destroy London.

      Help "RG"

      According to official figures, the United Kingdom has 225 thermonuclear warheads, 160 of which are on alert. The only means of delivery for British nuclear weapons are Trident II ballistic missiles deployed on four nuclear-powered submarines in Scotland. Each submarine carries 16 missiles equipped with individually guided warheads. At least one of the submarines is constantly on alert.

      Russian strategic nuclear forces have more than 2,5 warheads deployed on ballistic missiles in mines, submarines, mobile ground complexes, as well as cruise missiles of the Tu-95 and Tu-160 strategic bombers.

      https://rg.ru/2016/01/31/atom-site.html
    29. 0
      24 June 2021 22: 33
      I think it's time to massively install professional video equipment on our equipment and attach trained officers to it!
    30. -1
      24 June 2021 23: 02
      Those. if next time a hole from a shell appears in the wheelhouse, will the Anglo-Saxons say that it was a factory defect?
      Conclusion - or drown, or to board the next "hero" to take drinks
    31. +2
      24 June 2021 23: 53
      Our Defense Ministry can only mutilate its military with photo reports on all events, but could not make them at the right time
    32. -2
      25 June 2021 06: 22
      The arrogant once again loudly clicked us on the nose, and our "oak" Ministry of Defense and "wooden" zomboyaschik helped them.
      They showed solidarity with Bandera.
      They have made it clear that they do not recognize our warnings, restrictions, red lines and state borders.
      They showed that our fleet has nothing to oppose them even in our own territorial waters in the immediate vicinity of the main base.
      They showed total superiority in the information field and complete mediocrity of our would-be propagandists.

      You can't watch the video that our border guards showed without tears.
      A belated salvo in pursuit of a far-off offender ...
      And shooting from airplanes ..... where are the means of objective control, are they even there? Or they also turned out to be from Chinese unusable microcircuits.
      All this is sad.
      1. 0
        25 June 2021 18: 48
        This aggressive act is not supported by most readers of the English press.
    33. -2
      25 June 2021 06: 30
      Comments from the commander of the destroyer HMS Defender appeared in the British press

      What color did the press report it?
      1. 0
        25 June 2021 11: 35
        Quote: professor
        Comments from the commander of the destroyer HMS Defender appeared in the British press

        What color did the press report it?

        The colors of the British flag!

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"