The US Congress called on urgently to supply Ukraine with lethal weapons

28

The United States called on urgently to provide military assistance to Ukraine by supplying lethal weapons. A corresponding appeal came from the American Congress.

For immediate delivery weapons Ukraine was made by two congressmen from the Republican Party Mike Rogers and Michael McCall. They demanded that the White House send lethal weapons to Kiev, saying that the United States does not need to wait for Putin to "cross the red lines" by seizing new territories in Ukraine. They have traditionally explained all this by "Russia's aggression."



Congressmen accused the Biden administration of "indulging Putin's wishes" and exchanging Ukraine for "Kremlin friendship." Among the claims listed are the withdrawal of two US Navy ships from the Black Sea, the waiver of sanctions against Nord Stream 2, and the refusal to communicate with Ukrainian President Zelensky before the summit with Putin. In general, they defended Ukraine from Putin, demanding "to stop all this."

In principle, Washington does not refuse to provide military assistance to Ukraine, it has allocated $ 150 million as another aid package. Kiev, which feared to become a bargaining chip in the negotiations between Biden and Putin, nevertheless becomes it, but already in the internal political struggle in the United States. As the American media have repeatedly written, the factor of Ukraine is often used to pressure the Republicans on the Democrats and vice versa.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    28 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +3
      23 June 2021 11: 18
      Nothing new ...
      the question is not whether there will be / will not be, the question is when they will break through.
      1. +2
        23 June 2021 11: 30
        And they will continue in this direction, we need to take measures ...
        1. +2
          23 June 2021 11: 37
          Not from any direction we can, but from the direction from which we can, we must act concretely and effectively.
          1. +3
            23 June 2021 11: 40
            It remains only to decide on these steps ...
            1. +2
              23 June 2021 14: 56
              two Republican congressmen Mike Rogers and Michael McCall. They demanded that the White House send lethal weapons to Kiev, saying that the United States does not need to wait for Putin to "cross the red lines" by seizing new territories in Ukraine. They have traditionally explained all this by "Russia's aggression."

              The old guard of the followers of the Bush and McCain will not calm down in any way and continue the work of the colonial conquerors of the world - the fascist globalists from Fushington.

              One represents the interests of the US Armed Forces and the American military-industrial complex and he needs a war with Russia by the hands of Ukrainians, while the other needs a STATE DECONTROL in Russia with the transfer of power from Putin to a narcissistic rogue and corrupt collaborator-comprador Lyoshka Navalny.

              In the photo Mike Rogers and Michael McCall

              REFERENCE
              Michael Dennis Rogers, 63 (English Michael Dennis Rogers, born July 16, 1958 (, Hammond, Indiana) - American politician representing the Republican Party.
              - Since January 3, 2003, Member of the United States House of Representatives from the Third Congressional District of Alabama. Candidacy Rogers during a visit to Alabama supported incumbent President George W. Bush.
              - Vice-chairman (eng. ranking memeber) House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security (2019-2021) and on the Armed Services (from 2021).

              Michael Thomas McCall, 59 (eng. Michael Thomas McCaul January 14, 1962 Dallas, Texas) - American politician, Republican. Since 2005 represents the 10th congressional district of Texas in the US House of Representatives.
              Education.
              In 1984 he graduated from Trinity University in San Antonio, in 1987 received a law degree from St. Mary's University and was admitted to the bar. Completed courses at the John F. Kennedy Harvard Institute of Public Administration. From 1998 to 2002 he was the Deputy Attorney General of Texas.
              Political Views
              - Supporter of the change of Putin's power in Russia to the establishment of Navalny's power in the Russian Federation.
              - A resolute opponent of the construction of the SP-2 pipeline. In connection with the lifting of US sanctions against companies involved in the construction [a], said [2]:
              This project is an instrument of malign Russian influence; it will increase Europe's energy dependence on Moscow, make Ukraine more vulnerable to Russian aggression, and add billions of dollars to Putin's coffers.
              1. 0
                24 June 2021 17: 56
                American "hawks" can't wait to unleash a war and throw "great-breeds" into battle ...
        2. +4
          23 June 2021 11: 42
          Quote: cniza
          And they will continue in this direction, we need to take measures ...

          I agree that it is necessary to provide assistance to the fraternal people of Ukraine, military assistance and free them from the fascists, nationalists and the influence of the Anglo-Saxon globalists.
          1. +2
            23 June 2021 11: 43
            And we do not have a great choice, otherwise we will get a huge problem at our border ...
      2. +3
        23 June 2021 11: 36
        - urgently provide military assistance to Ukraine by supplying lethal weapons.
        And what was supplied before?
        What is the difference between a weapon for self-defense and an offensive weapon, or rather, for a “decisive rebuff”.
        Instead of Javelin tanks, for example?
        1. -1
          23 June 2021 11: 43
          Jabs, it seems, were sent to Poland .... and weapons, the range of an extensive and shock, offensive was not supplied there, nothing like that.
      3. +1
        23 June 2021 11: 51
        Quote: rocket757
        Nothing new ...
        the question is not whether there will be / will not be, the question is when they will break through.

        Until the issue is finally resolved, I would advise the Congress, as a preventive aid to Ukraine, to send two "brave fighters" Mike and Michael to strengthen the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
      4. +2
        23 June 2021 11: 55
        Like, now there are no American lethal weapons in Ukraine! laughing
    2. +8
      23 June 2021 11: 18
      Today, the United States is the purest global EVIL that is spreading war.
      1. +1
        23 June 2021 11: 35
        This is a direct call for war ... and Ukraine hopes for this (war)? ..
      2. +2
        23 June 2021 11: 40
        The US aggression against Russia is off the charts. The sarnya barks from all sides. This is how they hunt a bear. At the same time, they say the dogs bark on their own, they were born that way.
        1. 0
          23 June 2021 12: 03
          This is how they poison the bear.

          A bear who has learned to yell AU will never go hungry. (C) not mine
    3. -1
      23 June 2021 11: 18
      Is the soap / rope kit lethal? How many of these sets can be supplied for 150 cartoons?
    4. -1
      23 June 2021 11: 24
      In short, on the one hand, the United States intimidates the Russian Federation from open actions in Ukraine (it is not profitable for the Russian Federation to participate openly there) ... the armies of the DPR and LPR and "volunteers of the Russian Federation .....
    5. +1
      23 June 2021 11: 29
      The United States hopes to be able to raise a monster in the face of Ukraine against us ...
    6. 0
      23 June 2021 11: 35
      The US probably still has a lot of used military junk. And why is it gathering dust, you need to shake it off with benefit ...
    7. 0
      23 June 2021 11: 35
      In the US Congress, Russophobes compete who is cooler, who hates Russia more and more actively supports Ukrainian "democracy". That's where one of the focus of decision making in a future war is. And about such centers, it was clearly said earlier - striking in the event of a conflict.
    8. 0
      23 June 2021 11: 35
      As far as I understand, the meeting between Putin and Bidon brought results and not at all those that our analysts and propagandists had hoped for.
      1. +2
        23 June 2021 11: 55
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        the meeting between Putin and Bidon brought results and not at all those that our analysts and propagandists had hoped for.

        I think this is not the result yet. Moreover, no one has ever expressed hopes for a breakthrough in relations between Russia and the United States. Under no presidents, Congress has advocated a rapprochement between our countries. And there are no changes here.
      2. 0
        23 June 2021 13: 27
        which our analysts and propagandists have counted on.
        And not only ours. laughing
    9. -2
      23 June 2021 12: 02
      I also appeal to help Ukraine!
      Give each citizen of Ukraine one contraceptive.
      Each citizen of Ukraine has one mask.
      As a result, large sums of money will be saved for treatment and social benefits. This will allow, in the long term, to increase pensions for current citizens of Ukraine by about 2,5 kopecks.
    10. AAC
      0
      23 June 2021 12: 15
      Fundamentally correct strategy. Print dollars, order goods (weapons) for them, provide their country with jobs, send goods to Ukraine, and then whatever happens. The probability of returning back for these products is extremely small. And even if it is stolen or rotted in warehouses, then the price of the issue is the printing of paper. And if suddenly it works according to the original plan, then it's good, the loss is the printing of paper. If only we could. We would supply African Americans with Afghan nonsense and let them have fun with them at home. They are more busy with internal problems, less time for external ones.
    11. 0
      24 June 2021 14: 20
      Lethal weapon .. And scho tse take? Rope and soap chtol? bully
    12. 0
      25 June 2021 09: 51
      The Americans are going for broke. They provoke a world conflict in which, naturally, the world order is violated. And this will happen, since no small assets have been invested in the production of weapons. Wars are convenient in many cases. You just need to understand in what and why.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"