Hypersonic unmanned swarms: problems of electronic filling

35

Source: en.wikipedia.org

Hypersonic mainstream


The most important historical moments of the XXI century will definitely be replenished with the development and adoption of hypersonic weapons... This unconditional trump card is on a par with nuclear deterrence systems. In terms of the level of complexity and the required resources, nuclear technologies and hypersonic technologies are in many ways similar. To develop vehicles capable of accelerating to speeds of Mach 5-10, non-trivial approaches and solutions are required. At the same time, in theory, everything is relatively simple.


The main thing in any rocket is the propulsion system. For hypersonic vehicles, either engines with an oxidizer on board or ramjet engines are used. Examples of the former can be found in the Kinzhal missile system, and ramjet engines are used in the famous Russian Zircons. At the same time, the ramjet engine itself is far from a novelty. The schematic diagram was proposed back in 1913 by the Frenchman René Lauren. The engine does not have a compressor group, and the required pressure in the combustion chamber is formed by braking the air flow at supersonic speeds. The main disadvantage of this solution is the difficulty of working at traditional subsonic speeds. Even if engineers provide a ramjet engine with the ability to fly in such modes, the efficiency will not exceed 5%. And starting the motor without an additional accelerator in this case is generally impossible. Usually, a supply of oxidant is provided on board the aircraft, which allows the engine to revive and gain the required speed. Supersonic flight at a speed of about M = 3 is the most "comfortable" for a ramjet engine. Thermal efficiency is close to a record 64%, and temperatures around are not so critical for operation. Difficulties begin when switching to a speed above 5 Mach numbers. The most important is the gigantic temperature - up to 1960 degrees Celsius. This requires unique materials. For example, NPO Mashinostroenia is developing a whole class of heat-resistant titanium alloys for Russian hypersonic missiles. This, by the way, is the technological advantage of Russia - the defense industry has learned to use very finicky titanium since the days of the Soviet Union. The design of hypersonic ramjet engines is further complicated by the supersonic flow of gases in the combustion chamber.



The impossibility of ground tests is added to the treasury of hypersonic difficulties. It is very difficult, if not impossible, to create a wind tunnel of 5-10 Mach numbers on land with the current level of technology. And any tests of hypersonic missiles end with the destruction of prototypes. In many ways, this is similar to experiments with ammunition, only the level of costs is many times higher.

Hypersonic swarm


Russia is the world leader in the field of serial hypersonic technologies. And this is not trivial bravado - most foreign media outlets agree with this. True, they do not forget to mention historical justice from their point of view. The first in hypersound were the Nazis with V-2 technologies, much later the Americans experimented with similar equipment - X-15, X-43 and Lockheed X-17. Finally, the Chinese introduced the DF-2019 rocket in the fall of 17. The flight range of the device is about 2,5 thousand kilometers at a speed of Mach 5. At the same time, the DF-17 is based on a wheeled chassis, which seriously complicates its detection and response.

Another aircraft of the Chinese army is the hypersonic Starry Sky-2 - "Starry Sky-2". The Americans, acting in this case as the laggards, claim that in 2018 the rocket reached Mach 6 at an altitude of 30 km. Chinese hypersonic developments, along with Russian ones, are now ahead of the rest, and engineers can afford to predict the future.

So, researchers at the Beijing Institute of Technology in 2020 suggested that the next step in the development of hypersound would be swarms drones. In full analogy with the evolution of strike and reconnaissance drones, turning in the sky into a "collective mind". Given the possibilities of artificial intelligence, even ordinary drones with propellers, gathered in swarms, cause a natural shock. And here China predicts the emergence of hypersonic swarms.

Such sayings are not thrown in vain. Either Beijing is doing the appropriate work, or it is trying to test the waters and track the reaction of potential adversaries. Be that as it may, there are many fundamental obstacles to such a decision. Many of them have already been partially resolved. First of all, these are the most powerful shock and thermal loads on the body and stuffing of the devices with the slightest maneuvering on hypersound. This requires unique materials as well as shock and heat resistant electronics. A hypersonic object moves in a layer of high-temperature plasma, which is practically impenetrable for radio waves. If single missiles can move along a predetermined route without contacting the "center" in a hypersonic regime, then this is not enough for a team of missiles. This requires high-speed communication between individual drones. Researchers at the Beijing Institute of Technology hint at developing their own mobile network for artificial intelligence in hypersonic swarms.


Rocket DF-17. Source: deagel.com

It must be said that such militaristic stories from potential opponents impressed the United States very much. In addition to programs to develop its own hypersonic weapons, the Pentagon is funding enemy missile detection systems. The idea is to search for such superfast objects from near-earth orbit using infrared cameras - after all, a temperature of a couple of thousand degrees seriously unmasks hypersonic vehicles. Now L3Harris is doing this with a $ 121 million Pentagon grant.

Curtiss-Wright offers services to the US military in the development of electronic equipment for hypersonic missiles. American engineers believe that the main requirements for electronic chips and equipment will be: miniature size, heat resistance, modest power consumption, ability to work at low pressure and shock resistance. According to the developers, the military has to turn to civilian developers, since only they have the necessary competencies in the field of miniaturizing and reducing the energy consumption of electronic components. Suffice it to recall the evolution of cell phones. In this regard, it is more difficult for Russian gunsmiths - the country actually lacks civilian microelectronics of its own production.


Starry Sky-2. Source: scmp.com

The Chinese precedent with plans for a hypersonic swarm dictates new rules for the development of military technology. Countries with the right technology can become legislators in this area. And this means - the pendulum of the world weapons balance will swing in a dangerous way. We can only hope that in the direction of Russia.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +19
    27 June 2021 05: 08
    Recently, there are too many such articles "about nothing" on VO. negative The author, if you can't say anything new, why take up space on the site?
    1. +11
      27 June 2021 11: 10
      To measure the firing range in km / h (the first picture with the performance characteristics of the "zircon") immediately makes it clear that all these letters are about nothing.
      1. +1
        15 September 2021 15: 09
        And the speed is not measured in "max", but "M" ...)) "8M" Seems like that. ))
  2. +3
    27 June 2021 05: 59
    Doroobo!

    The picture shows an American hypersonic glider.
    And the Russian hypersound is like an onyx missile.
    1. +6
      27 June 2021 22: 05
      Some spiteful critics claim that Zircon is Onyx.
      Launched on a different trajectory. First, they say,
      it is thrown up by a solid fuel booster, and the rocket
      accelerates to 8 MAX. And then the Onyx direct flow turns on and
      Zircon gradually decreases and slows down to a comfortable
      Onyx speed 3 MAX. And flies to the goal.
      On average for the entire flight, the speed is 5 MAX.
      But I think this is slander! am
      1. +1
        28 June 2021 11: 23
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Some spiteful critics claim that Zircon is Onyx.
        Launched on a different trajectory. First, they say,
        it is thrown up by a solid fuel booster, and the rocket
        accelerates to 8 MAX. And then the Onyx direct flow turns on and
        Zircon gradually decreases and slows down to a comfortable
        Onyx speed 3 MAX. And flies to the goal.
        On average for the entire flight, the speed is 5 MAX.
        But I think this is slander! am


        No, not libel.
        I have been writing for the 5th year that Zircon is just a modification of Onyx, made in the same standard size for UKSK.
        For with my own eyes I saw the tender documentation for public services 5-6 years ago.
        And I believe my eyes and government documents more than pictures and other heresies.
  3. +2
    27 June 2021 06: 16
    The Pentagon is funding enemy missile detection systems. The idea is to search for such superfast objects from near-Earth orbit using infrared cameras - after all, a temperature of a couple of thousand degrees seriously unmasks hypersonic vehicles.

    The point is, it turns out "in the hat". It is with these finances that they will develop detection systems. This is akin to detecting meteor showers: you can see it with the eye, but you cannot touch it with your hand.
    It is in this connection that the question arises:
    "Well, they found it, and what next?" Means of destruction of hypersonic elements (and even maneuvering ones) have not yet been invented ... crying
  4. +4
    27 June 2021 06: 28
    Well, in the field of "heat-resistant" microelectronics, dielectric electronics, "functional" electronics are promising ... In the USSR, in the last years of its existence, they wanted to develop, just, "dielectric microelectronics" (it is very good for military affairs; because it works well and at high temperatures, and with radiation ...), but it turned out that it was too late ... I remember that they wrote something about "vacuum microcircuits" as promising for military equipment, but now "nicht andestend" is about this ... (Well, then they wrote a lot about ... even about pneumotronics ...)
    1. +4
      27 June 2021 11: 54
      Well, then they wrote a lot about what ... even about pneumotronics ...)

      Prevmotronic is inferior to all alternative methods in terms of speed, although logic elements were made on its basis.
  5. +12
    27 June 2021 07: 30
    A hypersonic swarm of drones.
  6. +9
    27 June 2021 07: 51
    Hypersonic unmanned swarms: problems of electronic filling

    Honestly sorry for the time spent reading this ...
    1. 0
      27 June 2021 11: 07
      Do you want someone to regret it?
      1. +3
        27 June 2021 11: 09
        Quote: gridasov
        Do you want someone to regret it?

        Gridasov, have you decided to troll me?
        Who you are, and what you are, most of the old-timers in VO are well known. wassat
  7. -2
    27 June 2021 11: 05
    I remember when one not clever Russian called me an ignoramus when he argued that there are wind tunnels with hyper-high air pressurization. And now they say that they really do not exist. The impotence in understanding that the friction of gases on the outflow surface is reduced to ionization of these surfaces with a further distribution of magnetic strengths throughout the form looks even funnier. It's generally good to be a bot and just follow the developments.
    1. +6
      27 June 2021 11: 51
      Dear, look at the official TsAGI website about this pipe https://tsagi.ru/experimental_base/aerodinamicheskaya-truba-t-117/, maybe you will correct your opinion.
  8. +8
    27 June 2021 11: 46
    It is very difficult, if not impossible, to create a wind tunnel of 5-10 Mach numbers on land with the current level of technology.

    A number of hypersonic installations have been built all over the world since the beginning of the 60s (the Ames Center, the Langley Center (USA), ONERA (France), TsAGI (the USSR, for not a single installation was built under the Russian Federation), and so on. that the author is absolutely not in the subject.
    1. -3
      27 June 2021 18: 11
      Then the question is who is cunning. If the Americans demonstrate such rockets in flight and which cannot withstand even a dozen seconds of flight, then what kind of wind tunnels could be
  9. +1
    27 June 2021 20: 56
    Quote: Yevgeny Fedorov
    Given the capabilities of artificial intelligence ...

    ))))
    there is no "artificial intelligence", this is, in my opinion, a stamp from a series of "weapons based on new physical principlesdistributed by those living in an alternate reality.

    "Ashmanov IS indicates that the concept of" artificial intelligence "(AI) is an imprecise translation of the English term artificial intelligence," artificial understanding. "
    It does not imply the ability to think, be aware of oneself, but only the ability to adequately respond to reality. "©
    those. - there is an obstacle, drove around an obstacle, etc.
    again the author has a problem with understanding the small British pidgin)))
    1. +3
      27 June 2021 21: 15
      AI usually refers to the synthesis of Machine Learning and Big Data.
      Sincerely
      1. +2
        27 June 2021 22: 30
        nobody75, someone understands AI as "Machine learning" + "DB", someone, as an author, endows a pile of microcircuits with consciousness, for example, a Turkish wretched jeans about a pepelats assembled from European components - according to legend, he gained a mind and something there reset to zero.
        important, in my opinion, is the accuracy of definitions, without fantasies.
        https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/1618530?_e_pi_=7%2CPAGE_ID10%2C6095402000
        1. +2
          28 June 2021 00: 02
          important, in my opinion, is the accuracy of definitions, without fantasies.

          And those who are seriously engaged in this area do not have any fantasies. All speculation on the topic of "gaining consciousness with a set of microcircuits" is associated with a lack of understanding of what neural networks are, how they work and why they can do without furious mathematical formulas.
          Sincerely
  10. +2
    28 June 2021 02: 50
    How many authors have become on VO writing for the sake of a fee, about what they do not understand anything. fool
  11. 0
    28 June 2021 12: 26
    a key technology in future wars will be the ability to influence communication and control channels, as well as electronics in general.
  12. 0
    29 June 2021 21: 33
    "For hypersonic vehicles, either engines with an oxidizer on board or ramjets are used. Examples of the former can be found in the Dagger missile system ..."
    What, what? belay In "Dagger", it seems like a version of the Iskander OTRK is used, if you believe the photographs and articles in the public domain. What, what is her oxidizing agent?
  13. 0
    30 June 2021 10: 45
    I believe that our developers are unable to make hypersonic technologies that surpass the performance characteristics of enemy technologies in terms of performance characteristics. Even the technologies of the 70s are incapable of improving. I am very upset because of this. Enemies have become many times stronger and are able to win with minimal losses.
  14. 0
    24 September 2021 16: 46
    No hypersound needed. It is too difficult, and besides, it is necessary to strive to make war cheaper, not more expensive. Intermediate carriers or attack UAVs from flying targets are a worthy thing. It feels like not everyone understands: any military model is, by definition, a consumable. And just one should strive to create those that will be completely combat-ready, but at the same time it is not a pity to lose them. And it can be produced in huge batches from common raw materials, not on the most modern equipment and not with the most qualified hands. True, this is difficult, you can't drink millions on this, so let's go to the hypersonic wunderwales.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"