The journalist illustrated the meeting of Putin and Biden with footage with Panikovsky and Balaganov from the Golden Calf

77

"What was that all about?" - asks journalist Konstantin Semin after the meeting in Geneva. "No knockouts, knockdowns and missed strikes," he notes after negotiations between Vladimir Putin and Joe Biden, adding that there was no news, except for the return of ambassadors and confirmation of the extension of the START-3 treaty.

As a video illustration of what preceded the summit in Switzerland and the summit itself, in the Agitprop program the journalist cites a fragment of the film "The Golden Calf" based on the work of Ilf and Petrov. This fragment - with Panikovsky's cries "You don't know what I'm going to do with him now, there will be a sea of ​​blood ...", after which the hero of Zinovy ​​Gerdt asks Shura Balaganov not to let go of his hands and talks about upbringing.



Indeed, the intensity of emotions before the meeting in Geneva was enormous. The meeting itself was calm. The parties, which threatened each other with consequences, also calmed down.

In the plot of "Agitprop" it is indicated that this calmness is connected with the following fact: for the same West, the world did not converge like a wedge on Russia and the Russian leadership. As an example, there are statements from the NATO and GXNUMX summits held in Brussels and London, respectively. There, the main “problem” was China. And Russia was referred to as a "cooperating with China" power.

It should be noted that during a meeting with Vladimir Putin, Joe Biden himself called Russia a great power, apparently forgetting how his ex-chief Barack Obama not so long ago referred Russia to a "regional-level power with an economy torn to shreds."

77 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    21 June 2021 08: 32
    Well, the presidents now have the protocols!
    Men are sitting, women are standing ... request
    Not gallant. No.
    We could have hired male translators then.
    1. +10
      21 June 2021 08: 37
      "You don't know what I'm going to do with him now, there will be a sea of ​​blood ...", this is a characteristic line of behavior of the US vassals: Poland, the Baltic countries, Ukraine and Georgia. Georgians are the only ones who decided to go from words to deeds, led by mad Mishiko laughing As for the Geneva meeting, we know exactly as much as we need to know ...
      1. -12
        21 June 2021 08: 50
        Quote: Finches
        As for the Geneva meeting, we know exactly as much as we need to know ...

        Typical thinking of a serf serf of the 18th century.
        1. +12
          21 June 2021 08: 59
          Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
          Quote: Finches
          As for the Geneva meeting, we know exactly as much as we need to know ...

          Typical thinking of a serf serf of the 18th century.

          You about yourself beloved.? wassat If not, then you should know that there is such a concept as classified information ... Although how can a serf serf know anything from wassat 17th century ... hi
          1. -11
            21 June 2021 09: 04
            Quote: 30 vis
            then you should know there is such a thing as closed information

            There is. So what? I personally do not want someone behind my back to decide my fate. Moreover, Putin and Biden represent not my interests, but the interests of the ruling class of their countries.
            1. +1
              22 June 2021 21: 36
              Would have asked for them in the company. business)))))
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. -11
            21 June 2021 09: 21
            Somehow it is not clear from your comment. Are you another slave or do you have the right?
            1. +5
              21 June 2021 09: 27
              Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
              Somehow it is not clear from your comment. Are you another slave or do you have the right?

              Here, of the incomprehensible, only one thing - when did we already have time for brotherhood?
              1. -11
                21 June 2021 09: 58
                It is unlikely that you and I will ever drink. Too much honor for you. I am an intelligent and handsome man of advanced communist views. You are a walking relic petty-bourgeois nationalist archaism. We are different people.
                1. +1
                  21 June 2021 11: 23
                  Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                  I am an intelligent and handsome man of advanced communist views.

                  - “I’m a handsome man, anyway!” - Yes .... With the mind you got excited, about the communist views too.
                  1. -3
                    21 June 2021 11: 54
                    Quote: 30 vis
                    With the mind you got excited, about the communist views too.

                    Oh how? Come on, surprise me. Tell me what's wrong with my communist views? Let's leave aside your envious passage about my mind.
                    1. +1
                      21 June 2021 13: 27
                      Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                      Come on, surprise me.

                      I won't herd pigs with you! I will ask for you! Or lumpen rules of communication do not know? Communists are always polite and correct.
                      1. -1
                        21 June 2021 13: 51
                        Quote: 30 vis
                        Communists are always polite and correct

                        Probably the communists imagined in pink snotty dreams they are like that. But I'm a real communist, so get used to it.
                        Quote: 30 vis
                        I won't herd pigs with you!

                        So you're also an illiterate swineherd? So where are you then with your pigs in the communist row then? Go learn it first.
                      2. +3
                        21 June 2021 14: 23
                        lumpen with you, talking, it's like a crazy visit a hospital. Come on, yap on the spine. "communist" he is from Phnom Penh. Damn
                    2. +1
                      22 June 2021 20: 45
                      Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                      Tell me what's wrong with my communist views?

                      it's not like that! Communism is just a modified herd instinct in a person who wakes up in conditions of group danger. And don't confuse elements of socialism with ideological dogmas.
                2. -1
                  21 June 2021 11: 25
                  Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                  It is unlikely that you and I will ever drink. Too much honor for you. I am an intelligent and handsome man of advanced communist views. You are a walking relic petty-bourgeois nationalist archaism. We are different people.

                  So well, after all, under communism there will be no secrets, yeah .. I say - a naive hamster who listened to either Meisner or the same Semin, but since it was not for the horse feed, only two words could be remembered: "communist" and "petty-bourgeois", about the "handsome and smart" came up somehow by itself, along the way ...
                  1. 0
                    21 June 2021 12: 04
                    Quote: Aleksandre
                    Well, after all, under communism there will be no secrets, yeah ..

                    Maybe you have enough to do demagoguery? I didn't say that. It is a pity that the custom of hitting cheaters with candelabra is a thing of the past. I would use it on you.
                    Quote: Aleksandre
                    a naive hamster who has listened to either Meisner or the same Semin

                    Oh, monsieur is familiar with the work of bloggers geshefters, monetizers of the left protest?
                    Quote: Aleksandre
                    but since the horse is not fed,

                    Tell me what did you understand such intimate of remishnokostikovy opuses that I did not understand? Tell us if it's possible. And then suddenly again another secret, not only not for everyone, but also for the elite.
                3. +3
                  21 June 2021 11: 53
                  Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                  I am an intelligent and handsome man of advanced communist views.

                  I apologize for wedging myself into your conversation, I am extremely interested in what it means - advanced communist views and where you can find out about it ???
                  1. -3
                    21 June 2021 12: 14
                    Quote: aybolyt678
                    I apologize for wedging myself into your conversation, I am extremely interested in what it means - advanced communist views and where you can find out about it ???

                    Like what? I think it is extremely important to take away and divide. Drive all the lousy intellectuals, bourgeois and kulaks into sharashka and gulags. Shoot the enemies of the people. Give everyone the same ration, walk in formation. So that there are no rich, only poor. And around there are monuments to Stalin, and the Yeltsin Center will be demolished by the hands of the Chubais prisoners, and a Stalin Center will be built in its place.
                  2. +1
                    21 June 2021 12: 17
                    Quote: aybolyt678
                    I apologize for wedging myself into your conversation, I am extremely interested in what it means - advanced communist views and where you can find out about it ???

                    Will you allow me to voice my version? I dare to hope that it is believable enough. There is such a pro-communist video blogger on YouTube, Remi Meisner, a very erudite person in himself, listening to him is interesting and undoubtedly informative, So, he has such a habit of greeting listeners of the next video with the words "hello, progressive humanity and all people of good will." ... Sometimes reading further comments, one gets the feeling that many do not listen further than these words. Well, figs out, everyone has already been appointed both progressive and kind, so why wrinkle a turnip for the sake of it? And it looks like one of them flew into the VO lol
                    1. -1
                      21 June 2021 18: 37
                      Sasha, can I wait for a clear answer from you? Or will the unrecognized genius on the couch never descend upon me?
                4. 0
                  23 June 2021 10: 10
                  Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                  It is unlikely that you and I will ever drink. Too much honor for you. I am an intelligent and handsome man of advanced communist views. You are a walking relic petty-bourgeois nationalist archaism. We are different people.

                  And on the topic of the article:
                  - I'm really poor! I haven't been in the bath for a year. I'm old. Girls don't like me!
                  - Why love you? Girls don't like people like you. They love young, leggy and politically literate. "(C)" Golden Calf " laughing
        3. +6
          21 June 2021 09: 21
          And sho, do the same slaves live with the Yankers, or do you want to argue that they were straight, straight, and told everything?
          The stupidity of the definition is FULL.
          1. -10
            21 June 2021 09: 24
            Quote: rocket757
            And sho, the Yankers have the same slaves

            Definitely the same.
            Quote: rocket757
            The stupidity of the definition is FULL.

            Prove it.
            1. +3
              21 June 2021 09: 36
              Ha, ha, whoever TOLD what the presidents talked about one on one? Yes, and with extended communication of information with a gulkin beak ... so, general phrases.
              We are all in the same situation ... whether we are happy with it or not, it is worth admitting.
              So sho if we ... we are all led, without exception.
              And Robinson's version, to which no one, in general, is a decree, this is a personal choice ...
              1. -8
                21 June 2021 09: 44
                What is this stream of consciousness for? I quite clearly, it seems to me, said that I was not satisfied with the point of view of my opponent regarding the fact that it is not a servile thing to know what is being decided in the bar. You said that I was wrong. And in response to a request to prove you began to bear, don't understand what. About personal choice, about the fact that we are all in the same situation and Robinson.
                1. +3
                  21 June 2021 10: 20
                  Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                  I quite clearly, it seems to me, said that I was not satisfied with the point of view of my opponent regarding the fact that it is not a servile thing to know what is being decided in the bar.

                  So what's the problem? Forward into battle, to the elections. Business then - become president and you know everything, even what is in the "closed folder". Moreover, it is absolutely all the same in which country you win the elections. So the possibilities are doubled.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                  2. -2
                    21 June 2021 16: 50
                    Yes, I'm looking at you, and the snitch is a nice person? It's sad when you have an administrative resource instead of a brain.
                    1. +1
                      22 June 2021 07: 43
                      Oh how !!! I did not expect that in my old age they would write radio operators wassat
                      However, I will undertake to give advice - Afobazol !!! This has not yet come to haloperidol.
        4. +2
          21 June 2021 16: 27
          Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
          Typical thinking of a serf serf of the 18th century.

          Such a deep knowledge of the servile essence, without personal experience is impossible, my congratulations feel
          1. -2
            21 June 2021 16: 48
            Well, yes, I have such a rich experience of communication with you.
      2. +2
        21 June 2021 16: 24
        Quote: Finches
        As for the Geneva meeting, we know exactly as much as we need to know ...

        And even less. For the information background directs attention in the opposite direction. request
    2. +2
      21 June 2021 08: 54
      Well, no really. laughing VVP praised Psaki won, they say, both a beauty and an educated (as soon as the language turned?) Immediately fell into sexists. Do they need it? Let them stand to the delight of the feminists.
    3. -5
      21 June 2021 08: 55
      Quote: prior
      Well, the presidents now have the protocols!
      Men are sitting, women are standing ... request
      Not gallant. No.
      We could have hired male translators then.

      You got ahead of me. The captured picture hurts the eye with its disrespect for a woman. The can is forgiven, the Darkest is not. And the rest too - to sit in the presence of the standing ladies ... And the protocol has nothing to do with it.
      1. +17
        21 June 2021 09: 28
        Where did you see the "ladies"? These are technicians - do you stand talking with your secretary? Diluted nonsense ...
        1. Cat
          +7
          21 June 2021 09: 36
          Do you talk to your secretary standing up?

          Sometimes. But lying is more comfortable. wassat
          1. +5
            21 June 2021 09: 55
            And I was "waiting" for such an answer ... well, everyone treats his secretary to the extent of his promiscuity ...
            1. Cat
              +3
              21 June 2021 10: 30
              secretary to the best of his promiscuity ..

              Well, not to the same extent. Secretary. Paprashu without innuendo.
              1. 0
                21 June 2021 11: 38
                Accepted ... correctly understood humor with a subtle hint ...
        2. -1
          21 June 2021 11: 54
          Quote: aleks neym_2
          Where did you see the "ladies"? These are technicians - do you stand talking with your secretary? Diluted nonsense ...

          I never thought that gender was determined by the position held.
          And, what would happen awful if in Geneva they found a couple more chairs for translators, and not forced them to stand bent over like slaves in front of the owner.
          1. +2
            21 June 2021 12: 14
            They (translators) are not entitled to a chair (chair, throne) - study diplomatic etiquette - where, what, when and why ...
            1. 0
              21 June 2021 13: 57
              Quote: aleks neym_2
              They (translators) are not entitled to a chair (chair, throne) - study diplomatic etiquette - where, what, when and why ...

              What, it says exactly that - the translators should STAND hunched over?
              Do not grind nonsense.
              1. +1
                21 June 2021 14: 26
                Oh, how outrageous! The snapshot recorded the moment when the translator bent down to transmit information - he wouldn’t be yelling at attention! Or, in your opinion, is it better to do this while sitting on the lap, even though the old one, but the President?
                1. -1
                  21 June 2021 19: 56
                  Quote: aleks neym_2
                  Or, in your opinion, is it better to do this while sitting on the lap, even though the old one, but the President?

                  Small-minded people, when they do not have normal arguments in an argument, begin to distort.
                  I was not talking about the president's knees, but about a pair of chairs that would stand slightly behind and on the side of the presidential ones. This would enable the lady to speak directly into the President's ear without bending over.
                  What are you arguing about? For the sake of a dispute? Stupid.
      2. +3
        21 June 2021 09: 39
        On the other hand, elderly people are sitting there. 71, 78, 69 years old are pensioners for a long time. They may well sit in the presence of young women, so that none of them violated etiquette.
        Except for one thing, perhaps he should be ashamed, this 59-year-old boy, he has not even retired yet :))
        1. +1
          21 June 2021 11: 56
          Quote: Avior
          On the other hand, elderly people are sitting there. 71, 78, 69 years old all

          So name the age when a man ceases to be him, if he is not a cripple.
          1. 0
            21 June 2021 14: 38
            Age by age, but three out of four look so that a decent young woman would give them a place in transport
            However, they do not travel in public transport.
            1. 0
              21 June 2021 20: 00
              Quote: Avior
              Age by age, but three out of four look so that a decent young woman would give them a place in transport

              A self-respecting man would not allow this. If you use transport, then you still have the strength to stand. Because of this disrespectful attitude of men towards women and young people, looking at this, they disrespect the elderly.
              1. -1
                21 June 2021 21: 16
                If using transport

                They don't use
                1. 0
                  21 June 2021 23: 08
                  Quote: Avior
                  If using transport

                  They don't use

                  Don't wag your back. You yourself are talking about transport.
                  1. -2
                    21 June 2021 23: 10
                    Don't wag your back.

                    You yourself agreed
                    If using transport

                    So
                    Don't wag your back

                    I will not bother you
                    hi
    4. 0
      21 June 2021 18: 49
      and who said that they are men?
      1. 0
        21 June 2021 20: 02
        Quote: Sirota
        and who said that they are men?

        Would you, who consider yourself a man, pull the cart that they are pulling?
        1. -1
          21 June 2021 21: 17
          One could say they pull if they had an ideal job.
          And so, they do not really pull.
          1. 0
            21 June 2021 22: 51
            Quote: Avior
            One could say they pull if they had an ideal job.
            And so, they do not really pull.

            I understand that you would have done a lot better?
            Have you done your job perfectly, or not without flaws? wassat
            1. -1
              21 June 2021 22: 53
              I understand that the article is about them, but why do you want to discuss me?
              1. 0
                21 June 2021 23: 05
                Quote: Avior
                I understand that the article is about them, but why do you want to discuss me?

                No, your persona doesn't interest me. I just don't like critics.
                I only criticize for what I could have done better - would put chairs for women, even though they are just technical workers.
                And you criticize it for pulling the cart badly, despite the fact that you personally would not have pulled this cart at all. Do you see the difference?
                By the way, you still haven't answered my questions -
                Quote: Krasnoyarsk

                I understand that you would have done a lot better?
                Have you done your job perfectly, or not without flaws?

                1. -1
                  21 June 2021 23: 12
                  I do not undertake work that I cannot do well.
                  What can not be said about them.
                  Well, if you are not ready to discuss the article, I will not interfere with you.
                  hi
    5. +1
      22 June 2021 14: 03
      That's when the ladies will be in the chairs in the same way. situations, then they will sit.
    6. 0
      23 June 2021 10: 19
      Quote: prior
      Well, the presidents now have the protocols!
      Men are sitting, women are standing ...

      It was Erdogan who set an example at the MEP, she came to give him some sense, but it turned out that the order is different in Turkey. Where men talk, there is no place for a woman. And nothing, they swallowed and not a single Eurofeminist vyaknula, all buried themselves in a rag and said nothing. And Putin said that Psaki is a clever beauty, they immediately declared him a sexist. Well, of course, he's not Erdogan, he won't make a head-ax.
  2. +4
    21 June 2021 08: 39
    Only our most optimistic and their patriots could expect anything breakthrough from this meeting.
    Well, ours still had a trump card - Putin is younger.
    But in fact, both presidents could sit silently for half an hour, and the press secretaries would later say that "the conversation took place in a constructive manner, during which positive solutions were found on some political issues ..."
  3. nnm
    +9
    21 June 2021 08: 41
    Yes, it is clear that the leitmotif was in probing the options for breaking off relations between China and Russia, and this slipped into one of the subsequent comments from the American side.
    But!
    1. The United States cannot and does not want to offer Russia a worthy replacement in the framework of partnership relations.
    2. Confidence in the USA -0! Today they will promise trillions of dollars and at least the disbanding of NATO, but tomorrow they will change everything by 180 degrees, and we have already spoiled relations with China ..

    So, I think, the only practical sense of the meeting is that we have agreed that we will no longer rush to the Third World War at such a rapid pace, but at some points we will communicate first. No more
    1. -2
      21 June 2021 08: 59
      Quote: nnm
      probing options for severing relations between China and Russia

      Putin is not stupid enough not to understand this.
      Quote: nnm
      the practical meaning of the meeting is

      Participation in START is a rather dubious fact.
    2. -2
      21 June 2021 09: 03
      As long as there is External Intelligence in Russia and means of delivery to the puppeteers' habitats, there cannot be any TMV, in the sense that you are voicing. The skins of the masters of the World are too valuable. When they gnaw from the inside, the generation of a real, and not ostentatious, confrontation with the bourgeois world will leave, perhaps they will be resolved. The amorphous mass of yeshniki will be easily taken and completely safe for themselves. The current fraternal power
      all the same scoops still on mentality. They resist, although they are dependent. Children, bills, nidvizuha on the territory of the enemy.
      1. nnm
        +1
        21 June 2021 09: 10
        Could you clarify, colleague, what is meant by the "scoop mentality"?
        1. 0
          21 June 2021 09: 18
          People born in the USSR with mother's milk have absorbed the axiom that the enemy is behind the Berlin Wall. This is at the subconscious level. Further education. Whoever had a dad and (or) mom "disidentified" turned out to be Egorks Gaidars, dogs, Luzhkovs, Makarevichs, Tsoi and of course Yeltsyns with Chubais.
          The result is known, Russia has lost its sovereignty. We have been imposed on us, alien to us, the Western model of life of individualism.
          1. nnm
            +3
            21 June 2021 09: 23
            Strange, but it always seemed to me that in the USSR they taught precisely internationalism and that countries can peacefully coexist together.
            And I didn't quite understand why Choi was on your list. I can only assume that you are not aware of the real meaning he puts into the song "Change". It's not about politics at all ...
            1. 0
              21 June 2021 09: 56
              Working class internationalism. Bourgeois enemy by definition.
              A call to change social relations, norms and rules of life, people's consciousness is not a policy?
              Like this...
              1. nnm
                +1
                21 June 2021 12: 39
                You have a strange opinion about the ideology of communism. That is, there is only the working class and the damned bourgeois?))) And the teachers, doctors, military who? And Lenin, Stalin - excuse me, bourgeois or the working class in that case?
                I'm afraid you wrote it all down incorrectly and confused everything. I remember that the working class is the vanguard, and not the only class capable of comprehending the ideas of internationalism.
                And about Tsoi, I repeat, do not replicate the wrong opinion, just read the adequate primary sources. This song is NOT about politics, it is a song with exactly the opposite idea, communist, if you like. About changes within the person himself, about the rejection of egocentrism and internal growth over oneself. Agree, it correlates very accurately with the phrase, according to which the program of the Educational program was started after the revolution - "we are not slaves, we are not slaves"?
                1. 0
                  22 June 2021 06: 50
                  And teachers, doctors, scientists serve the interests of the proletariat, its hegemony and dictatorship. It is the avant-garde, the class that establishes the social order, and if the rules of being are more mundane. First of all, there is a strict ban on personal enrichment. This is the cornerstone, everything is built around it, this is the main red line separating the two worlds. So it should be, just such a country wanted to see Lenin (until a certain period, until it entered the NEP) and Stalin, under whose leadership they built socialism.
                  Well, the Red Army-CA workers and peasants. Those. proletarian in essence, what kind of opposition there can be. An army of hard workers.
                  Most of the rockers of that time and Tsoi were no exception to the Soviet regime and the way of life in the USSR, to put it mildly, negatively. I have had occasion to personally communicate with some of this brethren. Changes, this is exactly how the youth perceived, organized by chatterboxes-Komsomol organizers and laughing at the aged power, which was barely moving. It is all to demolish and jerk into the bright future of rags, chewing gum and sausages. A signal for action, what is the inner world, what are you talking about?
  4. +2
    21 June 2021 08: 52
    I would like to know (really interesting) from a journalist about his association with the "golden" weights, which Balaganov sawed in vain.
  5. +6
    21 June 2021 09: 01
    The journalist illustrated the meeting of Putin and Biden with footage with Panikovsky and Balaganov from the Golden Calf
    And is it worthy of mentioning on VO?
    1. nnm
      +1
      21 June 2021 09: 12
      Everyone needs to live and develop. Therefore, I think, VO uses various affiliate programs. This is quite normal. Moreover, it corresponds to the subject of the resource.
      1. +4
        21 June 2021 09: 14
        Quote: nnm
        Everyone needs to live and develop.

        If only development does not turn into degradation.
  6. +3
    21 June 2021 09: 18
    Indeed, the intensity of emotions before the meeting in Geneva was enormous. The meeting itself was calm. The parties, which threatened each other with consequences, also calmed down.
    What's wrong? We met adults, experienced, responsible uncles and .... to be continued.
    1. +1
      21 June 2021 09: 44
      The parties also calmed down ...

      The trifle calmed down, because there are no marks on the globe. Either they erased it, or they still haven't agreed ... smile
      1. +1
        21 June 2021 10: 35
        Quote: dzvero
        The little thing has calmed down

        Our life is so ... strange.
        We are worried about and without it.
        Well, decided, big uncles of something there, will our life noticeably change from that?
  7. The comment was deleted.