Gremlins: A New Concept for US Air Warfare

30

Guest from the past


They tried to use the carrier aircraft for air launch of other winged vehicles (and I must say, not unsuccessfully) in different years. If we talk about the USSR, then one of the brightest representatives of this trend is project "Link"... Initially, the TB-1 was used as carriers, and then the famous TB-3 bomber. Airplanes I-4, I-5, I-Z and I-16 were suspended from them. It cannot be said that the idea became widespread: in 1942, the Zven-SPB crews performed about 30 sorties.

Nowadays, as you might guess, this direction is being developed most actively in the West, namely in the USA. True, no one plans to launch manned aircraft in the air.



But UAVs are just right for these purposes. The Americans have been working on the Gremlins program for several years, designed to provide the Air Force with relatively inexpensive droneswhich, nevertheless, could solve a variety of problems. Thanks to the efforts of the US Department of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), as well as Dynetics, owned by Leidos Corporation, the X-61A experimental vehicle was created. It is designed to prove that the concept has the right to exist in our realities. Other participants help Dynetics in this difficult task, in particular the notorious Kratos.


The program began in 2014, and during this time many have successfully forgotten about it. At the same time, it has been showing signs of growth and development over the past few years. Perhaps the best evidence of this is the recent plans of the Americans to expand the capabilities of the "flying aircraft carrier". Drones now want not only to launch and catch in flight, but also to replenish consumable payloads directly on the carrier.

"The government is adding requirements," said Steve Fendley, president of Kratos' Unmanned Systems Division. "They now want to re-arm the Gremlins in the air and redeploy so they won't be doing just one mission."

The X-61A itself will be able to reach speeds of up to M = 0,8, and its flight duration can reach several hours with a range of up to 920 kilometers. The maximum payload is about 65 kilograms: it is believed that they will be able to carry various sensors, electronic warfare systems, and even be used to destroy ground targets. One C-130 aircraft will be able to carry up to 20 such UAVs. In addition to it, other aircraft, including UAVs, can be used as a carrier.

The most curious idea is to launch drones from strategic bombers, but it is still difficult to say how feasible it is, and most importantly, whether the Americans will want to "convert" their most expensive combat vehicles into UAV carriers. Moreover, there are significant reductions ahead of us: at least if we talk about the B-1B fleet.

A journey of trial and error


The Americans have reasons to be proud, although it should be said right away that the tests are still very far from completion. As of January 2020, five X-61A have been built. In July 2019, an earthquake near China Lake damaged some of the test equipment, delaying the program. The X-61A made its first free flight on January 17, 2020. It passed successfully, but the main parachute did not open, and the device was lost as a result of a hard landing.

In August 2020, it became known about the second test flight: this time it was possible to successfully land the device using a parachute. The flight lasted over two hours. It is important to say that the tests involved a rendezvous with the C-130 aircraft.

Gremlins: A New Concept for US Air Warfare

The disappointment was last year's series of attempts to catch drones. In October 2020, the Americans tried to catch the UAV in the air nine times using a manipulator mounted on a C-130. All of them de facto ended in nothing, since there was too much movement regarding the capture of the manipulator and drone. The Gremlins eventually returned to earth using parachutes.

Since the Americans still managed to work out the interaction of the UAV groups, the tests cannot be called completely useless. As, however, and newer, which became known in January. The Americans have once again confirmed that the X-61A can act in close conjunction with the carrier.

“Our goal is to make the most of our testing goals, collect data and thereby improve the system as much as possible,” said Dynetics spokesman Tim Keater.


Now the efforts of the developers are aimed at finalizing the manipulator and the drone software. Given how many years the program has been in existence and how much experience the creators have already gained, there is little doubt that at some stage they will still be successful. And it's not just about testing.

"Miracle weapon" and the path into the unknown


Even if we forget about the "aircraft carriers" of the past, the presented concept is not unique. Last year, the United States conducted flight tests of the Sparrowhawk unmanned aerial vehicle, which can be launched from another aircraft. Specifically, during the tests, the MQ-9 Reaper UAV played its role, however, the wearable drone itself was not launched at that time.


Russia wants to use a fifth generation fighter for such purposes. In any case, this follows from the information provided by a source in the aircraft industry this year.

"One Su-57 fighter will be able to carry more than a dozen reconnaissance and strike drones, as well as electronic warfare in the intra-fuselage compartment," a source told RIA News.

In general, the concept even now, taking into account new technologies, looks complicated and redundant for solving many problems. It may well turn out that the price / combat effectiveness ratio will not be on the side of such drones, although, undoubtedly, the role of the drone aviation as such in modern warfare will only grow.

UAVs have one important advantage over manned vehicles: they save lives. In the case of drone launches from a manned carrier aircraft and its subsequent return to it, the risks to the life and health of the crews increase again. To some extent, the main advantage of the UAV, which we talked about above, is leveled.


Will the Americans be able to continue to be the leader in this direction? So far, if we talk about practical implementation, they have no clearly expressed competitors, despite the statements of Russia and the obvious interest from China. On the other hand, let's repeat ourselves until it says anything.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    21 June 2021 18: 55
    The idea is clear and probably promising. Of course, it fully reveals itself in the form of a swarm, and the returned one is not a carrier.
    After all, the main non-technical problem of the swarm is that since there are many UAVs in the swarm, it must be cheap. While cheap means small, small means it won't fly far. That is, the swarm does not attack thousands of kilometers away. The media solves this problem.
    Everything seems to be fine, but so far it has not worked out, especially the return to the carrier.
    It seems to me that (if we forget the purely software complexities of swarm management), a technological leap is needed here.
    While the attempts look somehow lurid or something ...
    1. +6
      22 June 2021 10: 37
      Another idea looks more realistic.
      Drones under the wings of the F-15.
      The F-15 flies quickly, after launching the drones it can stand up for itself in aerial combat.
      The Pentagon still buys 200 new F-15s to replace the old ones that are being decommissioned.
      They want to load them with 22 long-range explosive missiles.
      But aerial combat is rare and strike operations are frequent.
      Instead of explosive missiles (leaving 4 Sidewinder), you can hang 4 shock-reconnaissance jet drones.
      1. +1
        22 June 2021 14: 27
        But aerial combat is rare and strike operations are frequent.
        In my opinion, it is not entirely correct to assume that aviation was invented solely for the purpose of driving the Palestinians.
    2. 0
      23 June 2021 19: 31
      While cheap is small
      ... And there are also problems with resistance to the same EMP. One lucky impulse will cover the whole flock. Let's make protection - and at the expense of what?
  2. +2
    21 June 2021 18: 57
    The idea is interesting and seems to be promising. It seems that the Americans will be able to. They know about naval aircraft carriers. They will deal with the air. Here they have, as the author wrote: there are no competitors.
    1. -2
      22 June 2021 03: 41
      Quote: Hyperion
      It seems that the Americans will be able to. They know about naval aircraft carriers. They will deal with the air.
      Well, if we consider the pilots of carrier-based aircraft as particles of a remotely controlled swarm, then undoubtedly they have experience. laughing
  3. +2
    21 June 2021 19: 25
    I think it's an interesting idea to use kamikaze drones. They are relatively inexpensive and there will not be an incomprehensible system for returning drones to the carrier aircraft.
    1. +3
      22 June 2021 01: 17
      an interesting idea to use kamikaze drones.

      Tomahawk or X-55 will do? In "Yars" and "Bulava" pilots and navigators were not noticed either ... request .
      Want a smart swarm? To you in the 70s of the last century. Rockets "Granite" were quite smart and sociable among themselves. They chatted while flying, shared something there. To whom what, to whom, to whom something over the shoulder ... Even the eldest was elected by voting, well, in the event of the premature death of the leader. By yourself, without "people". That's it.
      Oh, I completely forgot .. In the USSR, only galoshes were made. Ugh, completely out of my mind. wink
      1. 0
        22 June 2021 10: 12
        Quote: dauria
        Want a smart swarm?

        One can see the following idea: a large plane (transport or bomber) flies in the direction of the adversary, before reaching the air defense zone, it releases 10-50 drones, relatively small - fewer Tomahawks and the like. These drones are partly shot down by air defense, but the rest work on pinpoint targets on the ground: air defense equipment, airplanes at airfields, mobile rocket launchers, etc. Unlike the missiles you named, drones can fly for a relatively long time, looking for targets. Is such an idea viable? By the way, I have doubts about the idea of ​​the Americans: the plane has released drones and must patrol in one place for several hours, waiting for the drones to complete their tasks. What if this carrier plane is shot down?
        Quote: dauria
        Oh, I completely forgot .. In the USSR, only galoshes were made.

        This is too much.
  4. +1
    21 June 2021 19: 41
    unambiguously America can ... yes, I have already seen the series where the Falcon has a UAV in flight (by the way, a drone), how it started and returned .. it’s supposed to start .. so soon the Falcons and other Supermen will soar in the skies of Afghanistan and Iraq ...
  5. -3
    21 June 2021 19: 58
    Gremlins: A New Concept for US Air Warfare
    ... Drones into battle !!! The more so .... do they really hope that they will not come back like this? fool
    1. -1
      21 June 2021 20: 29
      Is there anyone else who can afford the drone swarms, technologically and economically?
      1. -2
        21 June 2021 20: 33
        China is easy. We - if we want.
        1. +1
          21 June 2021 20: 52
          Quote: Newone
          China is easy. We - if we want.

          Ha, it's easy ... yes, they will ensure that everything is overfulfilled!
          We have a slightly different concept, which does not exclude the creation of "swarms" .... to extinguish the carriers of swarms from afar, or even at launch sites. Who can argue that this will not be more effective.
          In general, you will not check, you will not find out, so all the disputes are useless ... but to check, hardly anyone will take the risk, against a strong, vigorous state.
          1. -3
            21 June 2021 23: 46
            China will not smash technologically, they are at the level of the Americans of the 90s.
            1. 0
              22 June 2021 05: 59
              What is it to be asserted, one must be a great optimist or ...
  6. +2
    22 June 2021 04: 46
    In the event that drones are launched from a manned carrier aircraft and then returned to it, the risks to the life and health of the crews increase again.

    And who's stopping the use of a drone (with stealth technology) as a carrier for long-range drones? For example, to support the Airborne Forces. For short-range action, you can use the ground launch of drones. The pack needs different drones, like the wing of an aircraft carrier: reconnaissance, electronic warfare, shock, demonstration - to distract attention.
    1. +1
      22 June 2021 09: 37
      The budget gets in the way. Bo is not a rubber one.
  7. 0
    22 June 2021 09: 37
    Returning a drone in the wake of a huge transporter? It was originally an extremely dumb idea. Something like the idiotic "dance" of our railway rocket, "so as not to damage the tracks." The law is not written for fools ...
    If they want to keep the program, they have to work in two other ways. The first is disposable drones. In my opinion, the idea is the most promising, it only requires a very serious study of the drone from scratch. In an era when intelligence and ingenuity were replaced by total creativity, there are practically no specialists left who still know how to DESIGN, and not assemble from ready-made blocks. The drone necessary for the task cannot be assembled from blocks)
    Well, the second way is to capture the drone in the front projection, in pursuit. This is possible if the pilots are like in the 70s of the last century - great pros. I'm not sure that somewhere apart from a couple of aerobatic teams there are still some. Well, or you need to transfer both the plane and the drone under the control of a computer, and try to build a capture program. May work in low turbulence conditions.
  8. +1
    22 June 2021 15: 34
    The idea is promising, though. But first, it is worthwhile to properly implement the starting idea - the mass launch of a Swarm of unmanned aerial vehicles capable of independently performing a combat mission. It is better to create a return and refurbishment later.
    1. +1
      22 June 2021 16: 54
      They are not interested in the swarm. Fortunately, this is not yet feasible, there is not enough computing power, nor, and most importantly, the ability to organize uninterrupted communication. Again, fortunately, developer capabilities are diminished simply by a stake. There was a topic about shooting down missiles from ship installations by artillery fire. I talked to some in the subject ... In general, our God is happy that the current opportunities did not fall into the hands of Soviet scientists of the 60s, in 72. I am afraid that the weapons released by those people would clean up the planet nafig. Well, the current cleaners have already atrophied, and are unlikely to grow back) The destructive impact of capitalist ideas and methods on humanity is apparently already irreversible. We will end up with stagnation rather than war.
  9. -1
    8 August 2021 04: 17
    The author was wrong.
    The Russian Air Force has Gremlins. In the USA, they never use demonic names such as gorgon, gremlins,
    1. 0
      28 August 2021 20: 36
      Why, there are all kinds of dragons in the Air Force and in the US Navy, the concept of gremlin has nothing to do with the Russian language.
  10. 0
    16 September 2021 22: 33
    Airborne drones are a good idea, the question is in the cost of the complex. The carrier itself will need to be protected if it is not used against the barmaley without the Air Force and Air Defense. In the case of normal air defense, even such as the Iranian one, the carrier itself will be under attack at any moment. How valuable would it be to lose it, along with a bunch of drones?
  11. -1
    25 November 2021 19: 46
    - The main charm of this idea is that the C-130 can carry 20 such missile launchers - the drums, of course, a large Boeing can carry them under a hundred and raising them to an altitude of 10-12 km will significantly increase their launch range. A warhead of 65 kg is very solid. This makes it possible to carry a relatively small nuclear weapon. This incredibly increases the capabilities of the tactical command in the theater of operations, freeing tactical fighters from such a duty, which is completely unnecessary for them, especially since the same Gremlin, made of carbon fiber reinforced plastics and covered with an appropriate RPM, will have an extremely low EPR and pass through almost any air defense. And with a range of 900+ km, that's a lot ...
    And the air return version of the reconnaissance aircraft is a useful thing, but rather secondary, with the current resolution of satellite equipment ...