The shipborne air defense missile system "Resource" developed by the Almaz-Antey air defense complex will be shown for the first time at the maritime salon in St. Petersburg

Concern VKO "Almaz-Antey" will take part in the international naval show "IMDS-2021", which will be held from 23 to 27 June in St. Petersburg. According to the press service of the concern, the shipborne SAM "Resource" will be shown at the show for the first time.

The concern has decided to show the Resource multi-channel anti-aircraft missile system at IMDS-2021, designed to protect surface ships from an air attack. The new complex is capable of fighting manned and unmanned aerial targets in the near zone, including those flying at extremely low altitudes. No other details have been provided about the complex.

As stated by the general director of the concern, Yan Novikov, Almaz-Antey's products, namely sea-based air defense systems, make it possible to successfully fight any types of aerospace attack weapons.

In addition to the Resurs air defense system, the concern will present modifications of the Kalibr cruise missiles, a full-scale model of the Palma air defense missile system, a model of the 3M-47 Komar turret, as well as models of the Kasta-2E2 and Podlet-E radars.

According to the previously announced plans, more than 2021 ships, submarines, boats and ships will be presented at IMDS-15, in particular: the corvette "Gremyashchiy" of project 20385, the frigate of project 22350 "Admiral Kasatonov", MRK of project 22800 "Odintsovo", and also a minesweeper of project 12700 "Vladimir Emelyanov". In addition, the submarines of projects 636.3 "Varshavyanka" and 677 "Lada" will be presented for the first time.

Comments

[Jacket in stock]

In addition, the submarines of projects 636.3 "Varshavyanka" and 677 "Lada" will be presented for the first time.

Do we have Lada submarines in our fleet?

[vegan]

Quote: Jacket in stock

Do we have Lada submarines in our fleet?

There is St. Petersburg in trial operation for 10 years. 2 more must be completed.

[YOUR]

Exactly. One has not been completed since 2006, the second since 2015.

[vegan]

Quote: YOUR

Exactly. One has not been completed since 2006, the second since 2015.

There is a whole bunch of unsolvable problems, starting with the power plant. Therefore, construction was frozen and resumed only recently.

[A.K.]

In trial operation, one in my opinion, if I am not mistaken and the experiments have been going on for a long time for 6 years somewhere

[Grandfather]

why at the exhibition and not on the "boxes"? ah ... business ...

[isker]

Something I have a feeling that the development engineers there are from Ukraine ...

[alexmach]

No, according to insider information, all major developments from AvtoVAZ

[Boa kaa]

The morning began in the village ...
It seems to be like about the TOP M2 chilled recently baked.
But no! Again, I was drawn to the exotic - the "Resource" air defense missile system im hottsa, already driving teeth ... Well, if the banquet is at the expense of the firm, I don't mind. And if they spend again from the budget, then it's time to release Kudrin and his comrades on them! (as Ivan Vasilyevich said: - "Let them fly!" (c).
Again, a zoo is made from the AIA of the fleet, narrow-minded managers ...
And there was no information about the progress of the tests of this wunderwafe ... and where do they come from then !? -- unclear...

[alexmach]

It seems to be like about the TOP M2 chilled recently baked.
But no! Again, I was drawn to exoticism - the Resource air defense missile system was named after a hotz, it was already driving its teeth ...

M ... Why do you actually think that we are not talking about the overheated TOP?
Almaz-Antey is also the developer of the Torah and not only the Torah. Since they talk about the near zone IMHO, this will be the sea version of the TOP.

And there was no information about the progress of the tests of this wunderwafe ... and where do they come from then !? -- unclear...

Twice they fired TORA, looking overland, from the Admiral Grigorovich's helipad. The last time was just recently, during the last exercises.

[venik]

Quote: alexmach

Twice they fired TORA, looking overland, from the Admiral Grigorovich's helipad. The last time was just recently, during the last exercises.

======
There was such a thing! There, the most serious task was to "teach" "Tor-M2KM" to work at low-flying targets in conditions of glare from waves! It seems to have worked!

[Alex777]

M ... Why do you actually think that we are not talking about the overheated TOP?

Now the most effective in the fight against tactical drones is the Tor-M2 air defense system. At the same time, the cost of anti-aircraft guided missiles of the complex significantly exceeds the cost of small-sized drones. With this in mind, work is now being carried out to create a relatively cheap small-sized rocket for this complex .... In an interview with Rossiyskaya Gazeta, General of the Army Oleg Salyukov, Commander-in-Chief of the Ground Forces, said.

Source: http://bastion-karpenko.ru/tor-m2/ VTS "BASTION" AVKarpenko

[nobody75]

Excuse me, but the point is in a cheap rocket for a naval air defense system? Unfortunately, not a single naval CIUS is able to classify air targets with a 100% guarantee ... Can you imagine what happens if the CIUS anti-ship missile system, which is preparing to perform a slide, takes it for a cheap drone and works on it with a cheap rocket?
Sincerely

[Alex777]

You are asking me as commander-in-chief of the Army.
The carapace distinguishes drones from missiles.
"Nails" for him have already been shown at the parade.
I suppose your pessimism is exaggerated.
Even for Shtil-1, they were going to develop a smaller rocket to increase ammunition 1x4.
True, I don't know the details of how things are going there now.

[nobody75]

How would you personally build a goal classifier? On empirical grounds (EPR, vector of overloads, speed) or would you still apply the method of principal components to the training set? How would the time spent on the classification of the SVU affect the reaction time of the complex?
Sincerely

[Alex777]

How would you personally build a goal classifier?

No way. The others are busy.

[nobody75]

You are a happy man! I envy ... so far white envy ... I'm afraid that soon you will have to attend to the problems of classification. Data Science, however.
Sincerely

[Alex777]

I am afraid that soon you will have to attend to the classification problems.

Do not have to.

Data Science, however.

That's what I'm doing, young man ...

[nobody75]

And what do you write on, if not a secret?
Sincerely

[Alex777]

I, as I could, carefully explained to you that I was not interested in continuing the correspondence.
I read your other posts and came to this conclusion. I have the honor.

[517]

Quote: nobody75

Excuse me, but the point is in a cheap rocket for a naval air defense system? Unfortunately, not a single naval CIUS is able to classify air targets with a 100% guarantee ... Can you imagine what happens if the CIUS anti-ship missile system, which is preparing to perform a slide, takes it for a cheap drone and works on it with a cheap rocket?

eh ... nonsense you flog just enchanting

[Boa kaa]

Quote: alexmach

And why do you actually think that we are not talking about the overwhelmed TOP?

Elementary Watson! (with)
If the photo corresponds to the launch of the Resource air defense missile system, then this is definitely not Thor.
Thor has a mortar missile start, with the help of a PAD (expelling charge) ...
So, colleague, your version does not roll, it seems to me ...
AHA.

[Nemchinov Vl]

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

Elementary Watson! (with)
If the photo corresponds to the launch of the Resource air defense missile system, then this is definitely not Thor.
Thor has a mortar missile start, with the help of a PAD (expelling charge) ...
So, colleague, your version does not roll, it seems to me ...
AHA.

share your observations personally (!).... On the portal (in) articles VO, photos absolutely always correspond plot of the article ... ?! or there are ... misrepresentation ...... ? !!

[Alex777]

Elementary Watson! (with)
If the photo corresponds to the launch of the Resource air defense missile system, then this is definitely not Thor.

Irony is good ...
But why did you decide that someone on VO has a photo of the shooting of the complex, about which no one has heard or knows anything?
They are going to show it only for the first time at the exhibition.
For example, "Morpheus" has long been shown and where is it? Not up to him yet.
If you weren't in a hurry, this simple thought would surely have crossed your mind. Yeah.

[sivuch]

So I thought - maybe they decided to resurrect and darken Morpheus? Moreover, the only clarification is that the complex is multichannel

[Alex777]

By the way, it is quite possible that you are right.
Only, probably, it's not about "resurrect".
Apparently, he finally "got his hands on it" ...

[alexmach]

If the photo corresponds to the launch of the Resource air defense missile system, then this is definitely not Thor.

I'm afraid to be mistaken, but in my opinion, the photo shows generally shooting from some RBU-6000.

[517]

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

It seems to be like about the TOP M2 chilled recently baked.
But no! Again, I was drawn to the exotic - the "Resource" air defense missile system is a hotz, it is already driving its teeth.

This "Resource" "hangs out" on IMDS from the first serial corvette.
With the letter "P"
Well, our managers love "rebranding"

[nobody75]

I think that the 9M338K will be used in the air defense system. This gives a maximum defeat height of 12 km and a range of 15 km. Personally, I do not see any reason to "spoil" the TOP, since an attempt to combine the launcher, tracking radar and the guidance point will lead to the formation of dead zones. Most likely the escort stations will be spaced apart. With respect

[alexmach]

Personally, I don't see any reason to "spoil" the TOP, since an attempt to combine the launcher, tracking radar and the guidance point will lead to the formation of dead zones

Why do this on a maritime air defense system?

[nobody75]

But in the TOP, it's all on one chassis. If we spread it to different stations, then in terms of naval architecture we get "Atlant". So, one cannot do without a universal radar complex in the "smart mast", which Timokhin does not like so much.
Sincerely

[alexmach]

But in the TOP, it's all on one chassis. If we spread it to different stations, then in terms of naval architecture we get "Atlant"

Well, if you look at the same dagger - the launchers are separate, the "birdhouse" with the radar is separate ... Yes, unfortunately, not all-round, at least in the existing version, and is not integrated into a single tower but stands separately. But in a modern version, you can probably come up with something more "integrated".

[nobody75]

You are right, the main problem of modern naval air defense / missile defense is system integration. The Americans have been doing this for 30 years, and in our Navy the "farm" principle prevails. Each developer praises his stable and by hook or by crook drags it into the project ... An example of this is the long-suffering Brezhnev - Tbilisi - Kuznetsov.
And no one cares about how this whole squadron will work.
Sincerely