Military Review

The West is preparing new for Russia on June 22

181

West moves to new June 22



The European voyage of American President Joe Biden in the summer of 2021, the adoption by the leaders of the United States and Great Britain of the new Atlantic Charter, the G7 summit, the NATO summit in Brussels and the meeting in Geneva of the leaders of the United States and Russia marked the completion of the first stage (2014–2021) of preparing the collective West for armed aggression against Russia.

Let's go back to 1989, when the still living traitor Gorbachev signed the unconditional surrender of the USSR in the Cold War. First, he did this in Rome at a meeting with the Pope (representing the European wing of globalists), and then in Malta, at a meeting with US President Bush (representing the Atlantic wing of the world's shadow masters).

For the next quarter of a century (1989–2014), the collective West “digested” the loot in the vastness of the former USSR and slowly continued its “Drang nach Osten”. The collapse and destruction of Yugoslavia by NATO bombing followed, a chain of color revolutions in the countries of Eastern Europe, culminating in the coming to power of completely pro-Western puppets and the admission of these countries into the ranks of NATO. Then the Anglo-Saxons established a protectorate over the territories vital for Russia - Ukraine, the countries of the Caucasus and Central Asia.

Moscow itself all these years also followed in the mainstream of American policy: the country's financial system was under Western control, Russia entered the WTO on absolutely enslaving conditions for itself, surrendered all its allies in the former socialist camp, presented Norway with a huge water area of ​​the Barents Sea, and at the same time forgave everything the world of debts worth 140 billion dollars, not only depriving themselves of this money, but also losing effective leverage on the debtor countries. And all this against the background of regular economic crises, impoverishment of the population and two bloody Chechen wars organized in Russia by American "friends" and the Russian "fifth column".

But in 2014, the tightly drawn bow of Russian patience still snapped. In response to another "color revolution" in Kiev, which threatened the basing of the Black Sea fleet in Sevastopol, Russia reclaimed Crimea.

After that, the West received a much-needed excuse for any "retaliatory" actions against Moscow, which, even with this rather timid attempt to refuse to follow the old course of Western policy, created a "threat" to world security. Western strategists are launching the process of preparing direct armed aggression against Russia, proceeding strictly according to Napoleonic and Hitler's patterns.

On June 3, 2014, the US presidential administration adopted the so-called European Reinsurance Initiative, which has become a key element of Washington's strategy to counter the “provocative military actions of Russia in Ukraine”.

Then, at the NATO summits in Norfolk (2014), Warsaw (2016) and Brussels (2021), major strategic decisions were made. NATO officially proclaimed "the emergence of a new security threat in the face of Russia", declared it an aggressor and began to deploy its combat units along the Russian borders.

Causes of conflict


The point, of course, is not Crimea, Ukraine or Russia's "aggressive" actions.

The bloody withering away of capitalism, which by the beginning of the 1914th century swallowed up the entire planet, after which it began to devour itself, resulted in a continuous chain of wars for humanity. First, the First and Second World Wars (some historians quite reasonably combine them into a single world war of 1945-1946), the Cold War (1989-XNUMX), the collapse of the USSR and the socialist camp, which resulted in a new series of bloody conflicts, many of which smolder to this day (Balkans, Karabakh, Transnistria, Abkhazia, Ossetia, Donbass). The United States emerged victorious in this deadly struggle for a place in the sun, while rival countries such as Great Britain, Germany, France and Russia suffered a crushing defeat.

Having destroyed and robbed the USSR, the world capitalist system only postponed the systemic crisis that was tormenting it, which again broke out in 1998 and 2008. Each time his hunger was temporarily satisfied either by trillions of dollars printed out of thin air, or by the bloody Arab Spring, when the statehood of many countries in North Africa, the Near and Middle East was destroyed, and their energy resources fell into the hands of terrorists and revolutionaries of all stripes. That is, in fact - the order of the Western monopolies.

But these measures helped only to postpone, but not to resolve the global crisis.

The world hegemon in the person of the United States, writhing under the weight of the astronomical national debt, can improve its affairs only due to a new world massacre or a global pandemic (hello, COVID-19). This will not only allow you to dump the accumulated burden of economic and financial problems, but will also provide an opportunity to once again redraw the political map of the world, make good money in production and sales. weapons, and at the same time to reduce the "extra" population of the planet.

For this, the United States, first of all, is vitally important to completely subjugate the whole of Western Europe on the basis of the principle of the union of a rider and a horse. Indeed, in terms of the share of world GDP, the USA and the EU are approximately equal and, in the event of a political and economic absorption of Europe, Washington becomes an absolute economic world giant.

The second item on the American global agenda is the destruction of the strategic partnership between Moscow and Beijing, the undermining of Chinese economic power, and then the defeat of China and Russia one by one. This is supposed to be done through color revolutions, economic pressure or direct military aggression. All of these provisions were frankly reflected in the new 2017 US National Security Strategy.

Within the framework of this strategy, in recent years the United States has openly hammered together a bloc of satellites under its protectorate, directed both against Russia (in the form of a NATO bloc and they sang along in the person of Ukraine, Sweden, Georgia, Moldova and other "partners") and against China ( Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Australia, Vietnam and other countries of Southeast Asia, justifiably fearing the expansion of Chinese expansion).

During the presidency of Donald Trump, the NATO budget reached a record $ 1,1 trillion due to levies from European vassals of the United States. A significant percentage of these funds go to the purchase of new weapons, that is, to directly finance the American military-industrial complex. As a result, US revenues from the sale of its weapons have increased in recent years, and the share of expenses in the NATO structure has decreased.

In the fall of 2018, the former commander of NATO forces in Europe, American Lieutenant General Ben Hodges, spoke at the Warsaw Security Forum, where he was extremely frank. The overseas guest explained to the assembled European vassals that they need to increase their defense spending because in the next 15 years the United States will be at war with China and will be unable to protect them from a resurgent Russia.

Preparing NATO for aggression against Russia


In 2014, the formation of the so-called VJTF (Very High Readiness Joint Task Force) was started in the NATO structure. Seven years later, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg smugly announced:

“Perhaps the most important thing we have done is that for the first time in stories We have NATO troops in the eastern part of the Alliance. New battle groups have been deployed in the Baltic states and Poland, we have tripled NATO's rapid reaction forces. ”

The number and scale of NATO exercises along the Russian border has skyrocketed. And if earlier their implementation was explained by the peacekeeping or humanitarian essence, then after 2014 the aggressive, offensive nature of these measures is no longer hidden. NATO is openly preparing to seize the Kaliningrad region, is increasing its presence in the Baltics, threatening our allied Belarus, and NATO troops are directly involved in the genocide of the Russian population of Donbass.

At the same time, the NATO alliance is increasing its activity in the North Atlantic, Arctic, Black, Baltic and Mediterranean seas. To this end, partnership with countries that are not NATO members, but share the centuries-old aspiration of the globalists to isolate and destroy Russia, is being maximized. In the Baltic region, such countries are Sweden and Finland, in the Black Sea region - Georgia, Ukraine and Moldova.

In order to suppress the opposition from Germany, France and Italy unwilling to fight, as well as in connection with Britain's exit from the EU, Washington in 2016 achieved the adoption of a special declaration that consolidates the role of NATO as the main military force of the European Union. Therefore, all the talk of European leaders about the death of the brain of NATO and the possible creation of their own army of the European Union should not be taken seriously.

American missile defense position areas are being created in Romania and Poland. In order to remove the last legal obstacles to the deployment of American missiles there (including those with nuclear warheads), the United States has already broken the treaty with Russia on the elimination of intermediate and shorter-range missiles, the open skies treaty. The last of the pillars of the former security, the START-3 Treaty, is under threat. Washington is not tearing it up yet, as it keeps Russia's nuclear potential within the limits it needs when the strategy of mutual assured destruction ceases to work.

In recent years, NATO, the EU, the OSCE, the United States and other world structures have been intensively "setting fire" to Russia from inside and outside, fanning the smoldering coals of old conflicts near its borders and creating new military-political and economic problems. Crimea, Donbass, Syria, Transnistria and Karabakh, the economic crises of recent years and the depreciation of the ruble, growing separatism in the national republics, general impoverishment of the population and the continuing extinction of the Russian people are all links in the same chain.

The main stake in their game, the North Atlantic elites are making on the eternal Russian enemy and one of the strongest players in NATO - Turkey. The US and Great Britain plan to unite Poland, Turkey and Ukraine with their nationalist regimes into a single military bloc, adding to them Georgia, Azerbaijan, Romania, Bulgaria and Moldova. Thus, a deadly situation arises for Russia on its western and southern borders and in Syria. This process has not yet been brought to its logical conclusion, but it is being steadily implemented.

At the same time, in recent years, systematic work has been carried out to transform the territory of Western Europe (from Lisbon to Warsaw) into a single gigantic foothold for a future attack on Russia.

According to the official data of the Russian Ministry of Defense, only in the period 2014-2017. the NATO contingent in the Baltic states, Bulgaria, Poland and Romania has tripled, and the intensity of the exercises has doubled (from 282 to 548). Each year, NATO's intelligence activity near the Russian border increases by almost 1,5 times. The future theater of military operations is being carefully studied, strategic warehouses with equipment and weapons are being deployed. All that remains is to transfer to them only personnel, and the huge NATO army can be deployed at the Russian borders in the shortest possible time. Thus, NATO strategists intend to achieve strategic surprise, and at the same time to solve the logistical problems that have arisen before them.

The Defender of Europe NATO exercise, which took place in 2020 and 2021, practiced the transfer of US personnel to Europe, as well as future amphibious operations in the Baltics and the Caucasus.

Preparing the American and European populations for a future war, Washington and London have been regularly circulating statements by NATO generals in recent years that the Baltic states, Poland and the countries of Northern Europe are in danger of attack from an insidious and vicious Russia almost tomorrow. The global media are filled to capacity with publications about Russian cyber attacks, Russian poisoners, Russian saboteurs, and Russian interference in free elections. The main antiheroes of Hollywood were no longer Islamic terrorists or North Koreans, but we, the Russians. That is, following the precepts of Dr. Goebbels, the Western media hammer mountains of lies into the heads of their readers, which inevitably leaves a bitter residue of Russophobia in their minds.

The nonsense about the inevitable "Russian aggression" has already become so firmly ingrained in the consciousness of the North Atlantic establishment that it is viewed as something unshakable and inevitable. And more and more people not only in Russia, but all over the world are beginning to realize that NATO has already prepared a new Barbarossa plan, developed taking into account all modern geopolitical realities.

Why is NATO not afraid of Russia, its military and nuclear potential?


The reason is simple - the West has overwhelming military and economic superiority over Russia. For many readers, mesmerized by the flow of messages from the Russian media about the allegedly deep crisis of NATO, about the continuous successes of the Russian defense industry and the regular adoption of new types of weapons by the Russian army, these words will cause genuine indignation.

Well, let's talk in more detail about the real balance of forces.

The share of Russia in the world economy fluctuates at the level of 1-2%. Even if China, Russia, Iran and the DPRK are united into a single military-political bloc (which has not yet been observed in principle), then, according to the most optimistic estimates, this share will increase to 25%. Everything else (75%), one way or another, is controlled by the transnational corporations of the United States and its allied countries. That is, the NATO command can use in a future third world war most of the world's industry, raw materials and human resources.

A well-developed logistics system and a huge merchant fleet will quickly link the world's industrial centers into a single whole. All this will allow our enemies to establish the production of military products in the shortest possible time and fill the front with new ones. tanks, aircraft, ships, artillery and ammunition. With this balance of power, China will inevitably be shackled by the military might of the United States and its Asian allies. And for Russia (even taking into account its nuclear arsenal) there is no chance at all: we have a small population, a poor economy, and there is no coherent state strategy and policy. After the predatory tax, pension and social "reforms", there is no and cannot be unity between the authorities and society.

We have very little money. NATO's budget is over a trillion dollars. The US defense budget for 2019 is $ 716 billion, for 2020 - $ 738 billion and almost the same for 2021, which exceeds the military spending of all countries in the world combined. In 2016, Russia spent "only" 69 billion on military purposes, and by 2020 its defense budget was reduced to 46 billion.

Russian and Chinese weapons are indeed one of the best in the world, especially in terms of price-quality ratio. But it is well known to the enemy and roughly corresponds to the level of his weapons. Russian and Chinese technological innovations, new weapons systems are closely watched in the White House, the Pentagon and the State Department. And there they see that the planned mass flow of T-2015 tanks on the Armata platform, BMP T-14 and Boomerang, armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles on the Kurganets-15 platform, Su-25 fighters, Yasen-class submarines and Sarmat nuclear-armed strategic missiles have not begun to this day. They still exist only as prototypes or single production samples.

Superiority in human resources is also on the side of the enemy. According to recent data, there are at least 3,5 million troops in NATO armies versus about 0,9 million Russian. And if we add to this the armed forces of the European and Asian allies of the United States, hundreds of millions of young unemployed men in Latin America, the Islamic world and Asian countries who dream of moving to the United States and Western Europe, then the picture is quite sad for us. Even taking into account China.

The American army has long practiced the recruitment of foreign citizens who regularly and zealously serve for a handful of dollars and the prospect of obtaining US citizenship. In the event of war, the Pentagon will have no difficulty in deploying a huge army, in which the Americans will be represented by officers and technical specialists, and privates and sergeants will be recruited from tens of millions of English-speaking foreigners. This will allow the United States to fight any adversary, not really considering losses (a vivid example of this is Ukraine and Georgia). The most worthy, who are lucky enough to survive in the future bloody meat grinder, will receive the coveted American passport.

Do not forget that the American army is constantly waging war of varying degrees of intensity and is the most belligerent on the planet. In Ukraine, Georgia, Syria and Nagorno-Karabakh, NATO military analysts have a clear idea of ​​what future clashes between roughly equally technologically advanced adversaries might look like.

Having summarized the experience gained, the Americans openly admit that the Russian army has all the necessary means of warfare. However, this does not at all make her an invincible force. NATO has already drawn the proper conclusions and in recent years the US military has switched to fundamentally new teaching methods.
At the same time, the military industry is being rebooted, 31 programs have been launched in 6 main areas: hypersonic weapons, long-range cruise missiles, wireless high-speed control systems, a digital battlefield, long-range artillery and MLRS, and new soldier equipment.

Decisions have been adopted and are already being implemented to modernize the main NATO tanks Abrams, Leopard and Challenger, which received additional armor, new ammunition and fire control systems, thermal imagers, dynamic protection and the Israeli Trophy active protection system. In this configuration, they will pose a serious danger to Russian and Chinese tanks, and will also become a tough nut to crack for anti-tank weapons. Programs for the modernization and renewal of NATO armored vehicles, artillery, MLRS and self-propelled guns have already been adopted and are being implemented.

The enemy has a great advantage not only on the ground, but also in the air. Even taking into account China, the triple superiority will still remain on the side of NATO and the US allies. In addition, the West surpasses Russia and China in the number of fifth-generation aircraft. Although the Pentagon has already abandoned the F-35, you cannot erase a word from the song - today there are more than five hundred F-22 and F-35 in service. At the same time, the Russian Aerospace Forces have one (!) Serial Su-57, still without their "native" engines and weapons systems.

The overwhelming superiority of the enemy in the air is somewhat offset by modern Russian electronic warfare systems and a multilevel air defense system. However, any ground-based air defense, no matter how powerful and modern it is, can only complicate actions aviation enemy and seriously increase its losses. But not to win a convincing victory, as the example of the Second World War showed. The excellent anti-aircraft artillery of the Germans was never able to cope with the armadas of heavy bombers from the United States and England, which bombed Germany to the level of the Stone Age.

The fleet does not need to be compared. In all major classes of warships, the enemy (the United States, NATO countries and their allies) has a solid advantage, even taking into account China's sharply increased naval power.

The most dangerous thing is that the Anglo-Saxons are not stopped even by the presence of nuclear weapons in Russia and China. Western strategists believed that the appearance of hypersonic, kinetic and electromagnetic weapons would give them a good chance to unleash a third world war and at the same time avoid (or survive relatively painlessly) a retaliatory nuclear strike.
In the meantime, the stake in the hybrid war with Russia is being placed on other methods of war that do not require the direct participation of NATO military personnel.

Back in September 2002, President George W. Bush announced that, if necessary, the United States would act preemptively. What this outlandish word means became clear 4 years later, when Congress approved the National Security Strategy, in which the essence of preemptive war was officially enshrined. Structurally, it looks like this: regime change - building a new nation - rebuilding the country.

The purpose of this type of war is to change the cultural and civilizational essence of the state-forming people and to remove them from the rights to their own subsoil and resources, which are forever transferred to the use of the global corporations of the “golden billion”. The results of a "conventional" war can be revised over time (and are often revised), but the results of pre-emptive actions are fixed forever. The most important element of such a war is indirect violence: economic, ideological, political, informational and psychological, and others.

An excellent example is Germany, which after the world massacre of 1914-1945 was literally spiritually "castrated". If in the days of the Kaiser and the Fuhrer German men were considered worthy opponents and managed to bring almost the whole of Europe to their knees, now they dream of ... the life of a housewife and tremble like a leaf in front of crowds of migrants raping their women, calling the police for help with frightened faces.

Another example is Ukraine, where this process has been actively going on for the past 100 years and accelerated sharply after 2014. "Country 404" has long been sold-resold to transnational corporations, a television clown has become the president, the population is strangled by unemployment, taxes and utility bills, and local men, instead of fighting for their land and future, quietly drink themselves or submissively lay their heads under Russian bullets on the Eastern Front. Their courage is only enough to sue in the courts, where the would-be warriors are trying to get the authorities to get the required benefits for participating in a punitive operation in Donbass.

In Russia, the bulk of the Russian people retain their national identity, respect for their great ancestors and love for the Motherland. She does not accept the sale of the country, corruption and social injustice. Therefore, the main stake of the globalists in the process of destroying and re-educating Russians is placed on the liberal "fifth column". After all, those traitors who organized the collapse of the USSR have not gone anywhere. They, their descendants and followers have been in power for 30 years, they have colossal resources in their hands - information, financial, hardware.

At the behest of their overseas masters, the liberal media are trying to impose on the Russian world respect for "gay European values" and reverence for traitors like Vlasov, Solzhenitsyn or Yeltsin. Slowly but surely, liberals populate Russia with Caucasian and Asian migrants, organize social genocide of the Russian population (especially in the outback), stifle the economy and rigidly block any development of the country. All this with a high degree of probability, sooner or later, will cause a social explosion and another "revolution" in Russia.

After 2014, Washington and London did not even hide that they had set their agents of influence in Russia the task of achieving an uprising of the elites against Putin in order to overthrow him following the example of Nicholas II or Gorbachev. As part of the implementation of this strategy, the devaluation of the ruble in 2014 and 2020, the Panamagate and the Kremlin report, the partial robbery of Russian oligarchs, a wide range of all kinds of sanctions, the unsuccessful attempt of the Maidan in Moscow in 2019 and the active use of the figure of the “Berlin patient” by Western intelligence services have already followed. ".

President Putin does not suppress the activities of the liberal fifth column, but only slightly slows down the processes organized by it, apparently hoping to somehow safely sit out until the end of his presidential term and go into the shadows, leaving behind a country with a whole heap of unresolved socio-economic, military political and demographic problems.

The network of military medical laboratories and research centers, deployed with funds from the Pentagon and the CIA in South America, Europe, Africa, Asia and along our borders, poses a great danger to Russia and the Russian world. Dozens of disturbing articles have already been written about these laboratories. The information collected by specialists and journalists testifies to the obvious threats of the use of biological weapons against the population of Russia.

In 2018, the Russian Ministry of Defense directly announced to the whole world that in an underground laboratory in Georgia, American specialists continue to develop biological weapons, disregarding all international conventions.

In total, American centers for biomedical research appeared in six countries of the former USSR, including on the territory of the so-called "allies" of Russia in the CSTO: in Ukraine - 11, in Kazakhstan - 10, Armenia - 7, Azerbaijan - 8, Uzbekistan - 3 and Georgia - 10.

The world-famous whistleblower of the special services Edward Snowden said bluntly that America has long been poisoning Russians with biological weapons. According to him, the development of specific viruses, tropic to a certain genotype, and genetically modified fungi is underway in the United States. He named medicines, vaccines (hello, COVID-19) and food as means of delivery. Mosquitoes and ticks are used as carriers of infection.

Suddenly hitting China, and then the whole world, COVID-19 only confirmed these statements. The “fight” unfolding on the planet against the coronavirus pandemic in fact replaces the third world war, destroying the economies of most countries and reducing all measures of struggle to the “soft” genocide of all mankind, which is deprived of a normal lifestyle and, according to the precepts of Dr. Mengele from Auschwitz, they want to totally vaccinate.

Сonclusion


Summarizing the above, it is worth recognizing the obvious fact - the process of the destruction of the Russian World in all possible ways is proceeding at an accelerated pace, and since 2014 it has also been supplemented by NATO's open preparation for full-scale hostilities.

While Russia demonstrates relative unity before the aggression of the West and regularly fulfills all the instructions of the globalists (from the total digitalization of everything and everyone to the threat to massively vaccinate the entire population), the start of a full-scale war is postponed in favor of economic containment and military-political pressure. But as soon as Russia shows weakness or an attempt to break free from the suffocating "friendly" embrace of the West, all the levers of pressure will be immediately put into action. If global clans still fail to organize the next “revolution” or palace coup in our country, then around 2024–2025 we should probably expect the outbreak of hostilities.

By this time, the next presidential term of the aged Putin will end, our nuclear forces will largely degrade, and the Americans may have perfected the "Rapid Global Strike" system they are creating. No country in the world can defend itself against several thousand hypersonic and ballistic missiles flying from the ocean, land and space. According to American strategists, a simultaneous massive missile strike on ground mines, mobile nuclear forces, headquarters and command posts, coupled with the actions of sabotage groups and agents of influence in the highest circles, can lead to the destruction of the control system of the nuclear forces of Russia and China and neutralize them.

In general, the danger is extremely high and continues to grow.

In conclusion


For those who still doubt the inevitable start of World War III, let's compare the situation in the world before World War II and now.

The first serious coincidence is the almost complete loss of the authority of world organizations designed to prevent wars and control the process of "world peace."

Let us recall the complete impotence of the League of Nations created after the First World War during the intervention of Germany, Italy and Japan in Spain, Ethiopia, Czechoslovakia, Albania, Austria and China.

What do we see now?

Complete impotence and decorativeness of the UN during the bombing of Yugoslavia, US and NATO aggression in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Libya, Syria.

During its existence, neither the League of Nations nor the UN were able to resolve a single serious conflict, even between the countries that are its participants. The peacekeeping contingents of "blue helmets" sent around the world in most cases are a screen for redrawing the borders of states unwanted by Washington and London and reprisals against their leaders.

The second serious coincidence is the almost open formation of alliances of opposing states that are about to turn into full-fledged military blocs.

It is clear that in the event of a global conflict, together with the United States, there will be their satellites in the person of the NATO bloc members, as well as many countries of Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America. They have an overwhelming economic and military superiority on their side.

Beijing and Moscow are now forced to be friends against the United States. And China even proclaimed a new course towards global justice, which was previously the prerogative of the United States alone. On this platform, countries that have retained at least a little independence - Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba and Syria - can join China and Russia. But such a bloc has practically no chance of winning the global confrontation with the countries of the collective West. Unless you burn the planet in a nuclear fire.

The third coincidence that we have seen over the past 30 years is the emergence of hotbeds of armed conflicts all over the world, into which, one way or another, the leading countries of the planet, which are in geopolitical confrontation, are being drawn.

Both the First and Second World Wars were preceded by a chain of local conflicts that became the harbingers of the impending world massacre. The most striking example is the Spanish Civil War, which began in 1936 and ended exactly five months before the start of World War II. It was considered a purely internal, civil conflict, but on Spanish soil volunteers from all over the world clashed to death with Spanish, Italian and German fascists.

What do we see now?

Yes, the same "Spain" in Syria, Libya, Yemen, Iraq, Karabakh or Ukraine. The flame of war engulfs the world gradually, but inexorably.

Want more matches?

You are welcome! The arms race and the emergence of their fundamentally new types.

The First World War has enriched the arsenal of mankind with tanks, planes, airships, submarines, aircraft carriers, machine guns and poisonous gases. The Second World War presented jet aircraft and artillery, ballistic and anti-aircraft missiles, a nuclear bomb, rocket-propelled grenade launchers and much more. Next in line are combat robots, lasers, hypersonic missiles, electromagnetic cannons, swarms of attack drones, stealth fighters, satellites and combat space platforms.

And the most important thing is the crisis of capitalism, which has been going on for more than 100 years, and its bloody withering away. The transition to a post-capitalist future cannot take place without a new global cataclysm. One of the components of this apocalypse has already become the coronavirus COVID-19, which overnight changed the world for each of us. On the threshold of digitization of everything and everyone, from money to medicine and education. All this will allow globalists to effectively control human society, depriving any unwanted of everything - name, real estate, bank savings with one click of a button.

All this is superimposed on the openly Nazi worldview of the North Atlantic elites, who dream of doing away with China and Russia, the Islamic world and the rest of the world's peoples, and building their new world order on their ruins. They have experience in organizing and receiving geopolitical and economic dividends from the First and Second World Wars. So why not repeat it?
Author:
181 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Grandfather
    Grandfather 22 June 2021 11: 06
    +20
    The West is preparing new for Russia on June 22
    from the outside, I would have believed .., but in real life, why ??? what for ? money flows, they all have accounts, the IMF dictates ... why the war? physically reduce the population? so there are covids ... cheap and angry ... there will be no more bloody battle. there will be a quiet reduction in the livestock.
    1. Jcvai
      Jcvai 22 June 2021 11: 35
      +3
      Covid does not work effectively and selectively enough, stifling through collabs socially and economically "on the ground" brings more profit.
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana 22 June 2021 14: 20
        +7
        I completely agree with the author of this analytical article! Absolutely FULLY!
        This is a very literate and truthful article!
        At the same time, it is better to face the truth than to deceive yourself and bury your head in the sand out of innocence, exposing the enemy's ass.
        For if you are warned by the truth, then you can be armed in favor of your real defense!

        Those who believe in hating are naive people.
        Only by correctly analyzing and assessing the threatening situation in the world and in the country, you can plan adequate measures, take adequate actions and give a real reflection to the enemy!
        1. Max otto
          Max otto 22 June 2021 15: 48
          +3
          What do you agree with there? Article - nonsense senile laughing The most effective fighter of the Russian world at all times and epochs is the Russian world itself.
          The only thing that is right there is an assessment of the possibilities. True, Russia has not 0 chances, but much more. It is impossible to physically embrace the immensity, it is physically impossible to occupy such a country, even with NATA the occupants will end even before the Urals begin.
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana 22 June 2021 16: 04
            -4
            Quote: Max Otto
            What do you agree with there? The article is nonsense of the senile The most effective fighter of the Russian world at all times and epochs is the Russian world itself.

            Firstly. The "Russian world" is now divided.

            Secondly, TMV is really INEVITABLE! The only question is: who, when, where and how will it start?
            Therefore, in the author's article, I would also add a consideration of the need for a Preemptive strike by Russia on a potential aggressor!
            But this is a question of a special STRATEGY and TACTICS of the entire defense complex of measures on the part of the leadership of the Russian Federation - and is not subject to special disclosure.
            1. Max otto
              Max otto 22 June 2021 16: 13
              -2
              Oh, this shkolota, knows nothing, but climbs everywhere. (There should be a vulgar picture with a horse and pioneers, but I will not wassat )
              Where will you strike a preemptive strike? In Voronezh?
              (Where did the meme about "bomb Voronezh" come from?) For people who are weak in humor, I will leave a link.
              https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5acda6c2d7bf213a1be8aece/otkuda-vzialsia-mem-pro-bombit-voronej-5ad6d27efd96b135b7cf7141
            2. Vasia
              Vasia 23 June 2021 03: 55
              +5
              Therefore, in the author's article, I would also add a consideration of the need for a Preemptive strike by Russia on a potential aggressor!

              Everything is already in the Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation:
              The Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it and (or) its allies, as well as in the event of aggression against the Russian Federation using conventional weaponswhen the very existence of the state is threatened.

              http://kremlin.ru/supplement/461
              You can read it if you are not familiar.
          2. Aleksandr21
            Aleksandr21 23 June 2021 11: 29
            0
            Quote: Max Otto
            True, Russia has not 0 chances, but much more. It is impossible to physically embrace the immensity, it is physically impossible to occupy such a country, even with NATA the occupants will end even before the Urals begin.


            Do they need it, to physically capture such territory? Global Strike (Prompt Global Strike)

            No country in the world can defend itself against several thousand hypersonic and ballistic missiles flying from the ocean, land and space.
            - and this is a fact.

            after the breakthrough of the air defense and the destruction of our military potential, the Air Force will be deployed, the united NATO troops (led by the United States) will be transferred to Eastern Europe, the Turkish Armed Forces will be engaged in the Caucasus (the 2nd country is powerful in NATO, after all), the Far East - Japan, and the picture looms very bad ... and those territories that they cannot cover will be thrown away for many years, then puppet governments of these territories can be created .... so this is not a problem.
            1. Max otto
              Max otto 23 June 2021 12: 37
              0
              You answer me as if I were the author of the article. I am just sure that there is no point in occupying the West that already belongs to them.
        2. xorek
          xorek 22 June 2021 19: 59
          +5
          Quote: Tatiana
          Those who believe in hating are naive people.
          Only by correctly analyzing and assessing the threatening situation in the world and in the country, you can plan adequate measures, take adequate actions and give a real reflection to the enemy!

          Yes, no one believes Tatiana .. Already passed, all this, but the nagging is even worse, when here all whine is gone, "And Katz offers to surrender!"
          Gorbach, ebn here they offered to hand over everything, for the sake of a pat on the shoulder, etc.
          Now Russia is not the same and may already snap, judging by the squeal of the West, etc. ..Yes, there are many and very many problems, but still there is resistance, despite the terrible pressure from everyone, and especially within Russia, all the liberal whining forever that it is so good to live in the West, etc. And the bastards themselves are sitting here negative
          Russia needs a cleanup in everything!
          1. Vasia
            Vasia 23 June 2021 04: 39
            0
            Yes, there are many problems, very even, but nevertheless there is resistance, despite the terrible pressure from everyone and especially from within Russia, every liberal whining forever that it is so good to live in the West, etc. And the bastards themselves are sitting here negative
            Russia needs a cleanup in everything!

            Other times, other methods - the old ones are not applicable. There will be no clean-ups, maybe for the best. Now everything is more "graceful", otherwise everything is done. But the cleansing is being carried out, the proof is the reaction of the West. The appointed "Gauleiter" is still in the zone. Others are begging for Europe. "Waking up" - "on a pencil."
          2. Vladimir Mashkov
            Vladimir Mashkov 24 June 2021 16: 15
            +1
            Article - excessive whipping up passions and exaggeration, if not special misinformation. Which does not mean at all that you need to sit relaxed and hope for the West that does not "love" Russia and the Russians: you need to be in constant readiness to respond to its insolence. I believe that those who are entitled to and who have information much more than strategists in military affairs have corresponding plans, and as pioneers, they are always ready! smile
      2. zenion
        zenion 22 June 2021 19: 48
        -1
        For capitalism, war is needed not just like that, but also so that those who remain alive must understand that it makes no sense to rock the boat, they will grind them to dust. If there are aliens, or God, then you need to rely on their help, otherwise no one on this planet will understand anything. That is, people have not justified themselves on this planet. People on this planet are superfluous. Just like dinosaurs turned out to be superfluous.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. Grandfather
        Grandfather 22 June 2021 11: 41
        +9
        Quote: Bearded
        Where are we going to bury them all?

        hats ... hats.
        1. Machito
          Machito 22 June 2021 11: 44
          .
          Quote: Dead Day
          Quote: Bearded
          Where are we going to bury them all?

          hats ... hats.

          Well, where are these hordes of Genghis Khan, Napoleon, Hitler and other ghouls? Our climate is harsh for strangers. And people are hardened. Strangers do not survive on our land. They are dying like flies.
          1. Kronos
            Kronos 22 June 2021 12: 01
            +7
            Hordes of Mongols, if you have forgotten Kievan Rus, have conquered. Napaleon was not going to conquer anything with him, the Russian empire itself was constantly at war.
            1. Machito
              Machito 22 June 2021 12: 16
              +4
              The Mongol hordes stopped their conquests to the west with the capture of Rus and founded the largest state in terms of territory in the history of mankind. Now half of the territory of the former empire of Genghis Khan is occupied by Russia, conquered by the Mongols, and the Mongols still graze donkeys on the banks of the Kerulen.
              1. Civil
                Civil 22 June 2021 12: 39
                +13
                1. In order not to happen more "June 22, 1941" from Comrade Stalin, the new masters got the nuclear industry and nuclear weapons.
                2. You will decide there "Euro-fascists are preparing an attack" or "Geyropa has completely decomposed together with her soldiers."

                When you write a stupid propaganda article, try not to confuse old and new propaganda cliches, or remove the cross or put on panties.
              2. bzbo
                bzbo 22 June 2021 13: 09
                -4
                In general, the Khalkha now living in Mongolia and the Kazakhs with haplogroup C Y-DNA had nothing to do with the invasion of Genghis Khan. But the Nogai Horde, which left yellow-blue flags throughout Eastern Europe, is specifically the Polovtsians, South Russian steppe Ukrainians with the Russian haplogroup R1a - the Yellow Horde and reindeer herders from Southeast Asia with haplogroup N - the Blue Horde.

                For example, Tokhtamysh ruled in the Golden Horde and was friends with the Blue and ON
            2. Andrey Zhdanov-Nedilko
              Andrey Zhdanov-Nedilko 23 June 2021 17: 47
              -1
              Kievan Rus was not a single state - it was a group of principalities that fought with each other and rushed to the Kievan throne and resources, and who killed their own Slavs more than our enemies gathered together. The NFR (Novgorod Feudal Republic) was generally mired in continuous heresy and was ready to fall away to the West, and then convert to Catholicism. And only the arrival of the Mongols began to transform the remnants of Kievan Rus into Great Russia. Read Gumilyov and Zhdanov-Nedilko!
              1. Kronos
                Kronos 23 June 2021 18: 21
                -1
                Gumilyov is a dreamer, but feudal fragmentation was everywhere, like the massacre of its population by the aristocracy.
                1. Andrey Zhdanov-Nedilko
                  Andrey Zhdanov-Nedilko 23 June 2021 19: 51
                  0
                  I am a supporter of Gumilyov. You have your own views, I will not persuade and agitate. You agree with the rest. But it was not the aristocracy that slaughtered its people, but one part of the people slaughtered the other. At the same time, the aristocrats guided these processes and corrected the development of events. At the end of the confrontations, the aristocracy could have reconciled, and then development proceeded according to new, adjusted plans. We don't go far for examples - look at the history of our country from 1917 to 1939 approximately. There was so much ...
          2. dorz
            dorz 22 June 2021 12: 03
            -1
            To heap:

            The National Interest writes that the United States has developed a secret plan that involves the capture of Kaliningrad in the event of an armed clash in Eastern Europe. From the publication of the publication, retold by PolitRussia, it follows that this document provides for a simultaneous attack against the region of the Russian Federation in the air, on land, at sea and in cyberspace.

            Why should the West fight if the language of ultimatums is effective? At the expense of China: China will never fight for the Russian Federation and vice versa.
          3. Hypertension
            Hypertension 22 June 2021 13: 13
            +17
            Quote: Bearded
            Strangers do not survive on our land. They die like flies.

            However, they manage to take a lot of ours with them. Do you have "extra" 27 million people in Russia?
            Why this frenzied bravado? God forbid war - it will be bad for everyone. Moreover, a nuclear war.
            It is one thing that if they attack, we will fight back, but we should not pretend that the war for Russia is an easy walk. Russia paid for all its victories in blood. And a lot of blood. Your slogans look especially unpleasant today. Until June 22, 1941, there were also similar "little bloodshed, on foreign territory." And then there was the massacre.
        2. zenion
          zenion 22 June 2021 19: 54
          -5
          Old man. Most importantly, as far as you can understand, you need to stick to Putin. Prayer should be with words - long years Amen!
      2. aleksejkabanets
        aleksejkabanets 22 June 2021 11: 46
        +4
        Quote: Bearded
        Only the complete glazing of Europe will save us from the barbarian fascist hordes in the future.

        I’m wondering why then the Russian Federation became a raw materials appendage of Europe? What would they "glaze" if they stop buying gas and oil? Pay less attention to the TV.
      3. paul3390
        paul3390 22 June 2021 11: 47
        +7
        What are you going to vitrify ?? Mansions in Londinium, villas in Nice, accounts in Switzerland ?? Can you also offer to torpedo the yachts of oligarchs the size of an aircraft carrier?
      4. Niko
        Niko 22 June 2021 11: 51
        +12
        Quote: Bearded
        Eurofascists are preparing another attack on Russia, having a total superiority in technology and human resources.
        Where are we going to bury them all?
        I hope that in the event of another attack by the Euro-fascists, we will not be unhappy with them, but we will expose fascist Europe to total annihilation. Only the complete glazing of Europe will save us from the barbarian fascist hordes in the future.

        A typical example of fascist rhetoric and threats to other "supposedly fascists."
      5. paul3390
        paul3390 22 June 2021 11: 53
        +11
        Where are we going to bury them all?

        We all remember the footage of how our ancestors got up from the trenches to die "For the Motherland, for Stalin!" .. Will you do the same, "For the capitalist RF, for Putin"? Not? Hence the conclusions ...

        When you imagine why and with whose name you are ready to repeat the feats of your great-grandfathers, it means that the country is ready for war. And we will win again. In the meantime, alas. Something has strong doubts on this score.

        1. NDR-791
          NDR-791 22 June 2021 12: 34
          +2
          After all, those traitors who organized the collapse of the USSR have not gone anywhere. They, their descendants and followers have been in power for 30 years, they have colossal resources in their hands - information, financial, hardware.
          One who betrays once will betray again.
          Quote: paul3390
          When you imagine why and with whose name you are ready to repeat the feats of your great-grandfathers, it means that the country is ready for war. And we will win again. In the meantime, alas. Something has strong doubts on this score.

          Personally, I'm with the name of my grandfather (Finnish and up to Stalingrad inclusive). Only here to know in advance how many of us such opportunities are not present. And in real life I don't want to check.
          1. paul3390
            paul3390 22 June 2021 12: 37
            +6
            In addition to the name - you have to do something else .. Imagine the command: "Bayonets join! For United Russia, for Abramovich's yacht, for the palace in Gelendzhik, for a pension of 65 - for death, uraaaaaaaa .." !! Sounds crazy?
            1. aglet
              aglet 22 June 2021 12: 46
              -5
              "Sounds crazy?"
              crazy, yes. but timely
              1. paul3390
                paul3390 22 June 2021 12: 48
                0
                Enemies once attacked one country.
                Mobilization is announced.
                10% of those mobilized stand under arms and go to defend their homeland.
                90% organize online rallies:
                - Who will guarantee me that this machine will not shoot at me?
                - How do you know that in two years from riding in this tank there will be no harmful effects on health?
                - This bulletproof vest was developed only six months ago, for sure it only enhances the effect of bullets!
                - I am against forced mobilization, the choice to defend the Motherland or betray must be free, this is everyone's personal business!
                1. Hypertension
                  Hypertension 22 June 2021 14: 28
                  +2
                  Enemies once attacked one country, well, as one ... Far from one.
                  Mobilization is announced.
                  Contradictory decrees are announced. Either wear a helmet or not. Either the enemy is the enemy, then the enemy is a "miracle miracle."
                  10% of those mobilized stand under arms and go to defend their homeland.
                  Coincidentally, this 10% is the same as voting for the Great Party. Moreover, they vote so strongly that the Party gets a majority in fair and transparent elections. These 10% are the elite, the color of the nation. The party told them: - it is necessary! They answered: - there is! No doubt, no regret, no fear. Bogatyrs are not you!
                  90% are perplexed on the Internet:
                  - Did the father of the nation say that war is a voluntary matter?
                  - How is it known that the enemy must be fought with the help of small arms, and not laser? After all, the enemy has not been properly studied. Maybe the bullet won't take him? And if the enemy has strong armor and me ricochet?
                  - These vests are a strange thing! Some say you need to wear it, others, on the contrary, say that you can wear out in a bulletproof vest and die from heatstroke before the enemy approaches.
                  - I am against forced mobilization. It is not clear with whom, it is not clear how to fight.
                  And the truth is the commanders,
                  What can you rip off uniforms
                  About Russian syringes?
                  After all, these are the same generals
                  That medicine was improved
                  They called us from the bunker:
                  - Well die near Moscow!
            2. NDR-791
              NDR-791 22 June 2021 12: 46
              +3
              Quote: paul3390
              Sounds crazy?

              So yes, crazy. I don't know, probably not for what, but against what. It may sound strange, but for example, the "new acupation administration" will absolutely not need me in any capacity. Yes, and raised like that in early times.
              1. paul3390
                paul3390 22 June 2021 12: 49
                -2
                The "new acupation administration" will absolutely not need me in any capacity

                A type of the old occupation administration - you are undoubtedly vitally needed already save no ?? what
                1. NDR-791
                  NDR-791 22 June 2021 12: 56
                  +1
                  Of course you need it !!! These taxes, fees and fines are collected from me by my mom, don't cry !!! wassat It has been adjusted and worked out. And while the new one tunes in, while it tries on, I'll die myself. Therefore, 50+ is already a consumable for them, it is too late to reeducate us. So it's better to "join the bayonets" (by the way, I was still taught bayonet fighting, unlike now). So “I’ll die, but I’ll jump with my foot,” as Fishka's grandfather used to say.
                  1. paul3390
                    paul3390 22 June 2021 12: 59
                    -2
                    Why do you think that the new type will destroy the well-functioning system of taking dough from citizens? what Even Temujin Esugeevich was once convinced that it was unreasonable to do this, and he was still that scumbag and a Papuan .. bully
                    1. NDR-791
                      NDR-791 22 June 2021 13: 06
                      -1
                      good Liked about Esugeevich. Because although he was lame, he was great! And this gopota puts her system wherever they reach. And the system only partially coincides with ours (or rather, it is ours and theirs). Therefore, failures, punctures and jambs are required. And if they still endure this from their beavers, then from other people's figs! Here is the first partisan detachment named after Putin. Nonsense, of course, but in every joke there is only a fraction ...
                      1. ALARI
                        ALARI 22 June 2021 13: 24
                        +9
                        Temujin took the name Genghis Khan, and Tamerlane was lame, he lived 200 years later.
        2. Vasia
          Vasia 23 June 2021 04: 05
          +2
          "For the Motherland, for Stalin!" .. "For the capitalist RF, for Putin"

          And what, the capitalist Russian Federation is no longer the Motherland? And serf Russia?
          After all, no one has ever shouted in Russia: "For the personal mansions of the tsar and boyars, for the oprichnina!" According to your logic, all wars should have been lost. What kind of nonsense are you trying to sell?
        3. Andrey Zhdanov-Nedilko
          Andrey Zhdanov-Nedilko 23 June 2021 17: 59
          +1
          Our ancestors over these 1000 plus years, too, attacking the enemy, shouted different things, but that is not the point. Our ancestors defended the Motherland with a capital letter, a small homeland with a small letter, their wives and children, their old people, their unborn future descendants, their land, their churchyards and churches, their memory ... You can rise to the attack from the trench and silently , like a c / c, but whispering at the same time: "FOR YOU, RUSSIA !!! WE WILL WIN! AND EVEN IF WE DIE TODAY, IT'S EVERYTHING, VICTORY WILL BE OUR!"
    3. Old Orc
      Old Orc 22 June 2021 11: 41
      +4
      The answer is simple. Destruction of infrastructure, both industrial and social. If you give an analogy, now the situation is when the canvas is completely filled with a drawing. you need to erase the old one to draw a new one. A peaceful outcome is impossible, as it implies the need for general alignment. Both a janitor and a millionaire with the same resources and capabilities. Can you imagine that at least one money addict would agree to stop spitting from top to bottom on other people? it's impossible. This is a vegetarian wolf. So we are waiting for the arrival of light and heat in megatons.
    4. paul3390
      paul3390 22 June 2021 11: 44
      +15
      All noneshnie types of butting with the West are solely due to the fact that they cannot agree on the price. As soon as they offer an acceptable option, our bourgeois will immediately sell the country and us, after which they will be dumped at the location of the capital and real estate. Why fight here? It's easier to moderate greed and give what you ask for. Anything more profitable than war will cost ..

      I hope - no one has any illusions about patriotism of the other type of elite?
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 22 June 2021 12: 37
        +1
        Quote: paul3390
        As soon as they offer an acceptable option, our bourgeois will immediately sell the country and us, after which they will be dumped at the location of the capital and real estate.

        In this way and under the same conditions with the beginning of WWII, all of Europe in an extremely short time fell under Hitler, and only the USSR, the country of workers and peasants, was able to stop and defeat the Western plague, and even some areas of communist China held out.
      2. Vasia
        Vasia 23 June 2021 05: 01
        -3
        As soon as they offer an acceptable option, our bourgeois will immediately sell the country and us, after which they will be dumped at the location of the capital and real estate. Why fight here? It's easier to moderate greed and give what you ask for. Anything more profitable than war will cost ..

        Stop telling stories. There have never been our bourgeoisie, tk. bourgeois were originally created by the West "not ours" and to control us. As elsewhere, however, where the West took power. The bourgeois (oligarchs) are one of the main pillars, absolutely controlled by the West, created in order to control what is happening in the occupied territories. They may be "bourgeois" for us, for them they are slaves who can be made beggars and trampled down at the snap of their fingers if they behave badly.
        1. paul3390
          paul3390 23 June 2021 12: 27
          +1
          Don't be smart about crap. The bourgeoisie is full of contradictions, including national ones.
          1. Vasia
            Vasia 23 June 2021 12: 54
            0
            Don't be smart about crap.

            You do this with enviable consistency, but this is your business - I am not a decree for you, as you are for me.
      3. Aleksandr21
        Aleksandr21 23 June 2021 11: 43
        0
        Quote: paul3390
        I hope - no one has any illusions about patriotism of the other type of elite?


        There are no illusions, but where are the guarantees of the Russian elite - that their property (property, money, etc.) will not be taken away in the West? And are such guarantees possible? When, by a court decision of the United States, Great Britain, an oligarch becomes a beggar, and his property is divided up by the Western elites :) can't this be? Yes Easy.
        Therefore, it makes sense to fight for a piece of your territory.
    5. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 22 June 2021 12: 20
      -1
      Quote: Dead Day
      what for ?

      There is an acute need. As capitalism exists, it no longer works. "They have the money"? Who exactly? Money from those who do not need it. What the same Bezos can do with them? Even eating them will not work ... At the same time, the system of social relations called "capitalism" suffocates due to the fact that, in principle, it cannot establish politics and economics so that the minority does not lose the meaning of existence, and the majority does not lose food sources, not to mention some decent life.
      For capitalism, in general, poverty is not needed. Poor people DO NOT BUY. However, capitalism is not able to make sure that people do not become poor and do not turn into beggars. This is a natural and inevitable process for him - hard workers get poorer, then poorer, then fly to the sidelines of life. And then there is no one to sell what the factories owned by the rich have produced. Methods of "throwing money from helicopters" lead to the fact that financial mechanisms fall apart, money depreciates ... do-do-do? !!
      There is no answer within capitalism.
      1. paul3390
        paul3390 22 June 2021 12: 34
        +7
        Poor DO NOT BUY

        Alas, the classic formula “commodity-money-commodity” has not worked for a long time. Kapitalyugi have learned to make money out of thin air, and they no longer need any commodity production to acquire capital. Therefore - before the pager they are the people of poverty ..
        1. Mikhail3
          Mikhail3 22 June 2021 12: 38
          -1
          Oh-ho-ho ... And before they could not do it out of thin air? The method is really old. But, every coin, every computer zero drawn on the knee, more and more overload the financial system. At the moment, she is so overloaded with candy wrappers that she keeps afloat solely on a miracle. A miracle is a fickle thing. In fact, the world financial system at any moment may lose stability altogether. And their "wealth" will instantly disappear. So they run around like a chicken without a head - something needs to be done about it, only they don't know what.
          1. paul3390
            paul3390 22 June 2021 12: 41
            +4
            They won't go anywhere, the wealth of the alligats. They are by no means woodpeckers, and most of the money is invested in some kind of tangible assets.

            Savings of ordinary people will disappear - all sorts of social, pension funds, all mortgages, all mortgages, etc. .. And don't worry about the bourgeoisie ..
            1. Mikhail3
              Mikhail3 22 June 2021 12: 44
              +1
              Read more. Watch the video, it corrupts the mind, stops its development. Even a tenth of what they now call wealth, in principle, cannot be invested in anything. Even the twentieth. There are simply no material resources in the world (as well as non-material, such as software) in which money could be invested. Suddenly))
              1. paul3390
                paul3390 22 June 2021 12: 47
                0
                And what do you seriously think that already bought real assets of their type will not be enough for life ?? belay
                1. Mikhail3
                  Mikhail3 22 June 2021 16: 59
                  +1
                  Damn ... Tell me, why does a serial killer kill? Is he missing the dead already? Strange question, huh? The essence of capitalism is not that the capitalist has enough. In principle, he lacks and cannot be enough, his life is a fight with others like him. It works like this! As soon as one capitalist gains an advantage, he immediately takes everything he can from the other. Then either completely destroys this other, or throws him at the mercy of weaker predators. This is such a view of the world, a way to live. The capitalist cannot think that he has enough.
                  1. paul3390
                    paul3390 22 June 2021 17: 07
                    +1
                    Well, these exaggerated finances are intended only for one purpose - to buy up as many real assets as possible for nothing. And then - to hell with them, with dollars. They will reset to zero and introduce some kind of amero .. From this point of view, they have already had enough wrappers. Nearly..
                    1. zenion
                      zenion 22 June 2021 20: 19
                      +1
                      The real is the planet and the Cosmos. And all other things are so disappearing. Remember in "The Master and Margarita", as the devil said that life is so short that a person can plan absolutely nothing. They spoke in Russia and not only in Russia - man proposes, but God disposes. Throw a man at least a dime of gold, he will not be full of it. Man is a herd animal and hates the same. Even if only the rich remain, it will not end well. Must be left alone and die quickly. Kings, Sultans and others had enormous wealth, but they had children who killed them. Man is an insatiable creature. Watch the cartoon "The Golden Antelope". The Raja wanted gold, a lot of gold. Antelope said - I will give you a lot of gold, but when you say enough, it will all turn into shards. The Raja said there is never enough gold. And the antelope began to carve gold for him. Gold has already begun to fill it up. He asked her: stop, have mercy on me, and she carves and carves. When it began to fall asleep completely and he could no longer breathe, he shouted enough. All the gold turned into shards. Capitalism is a sports competition - who rakes the most. And in today's sport, all means are good. And war for capitalism is doping.
                    2. Mikhail3
                      Mikhail3 23 June 2021 13: 45
                      0
                      Are you not an American for an hour, Pavel?) Very Anglo-Saxon, stepwise thinking. Beautiful and clear - this is the task, this is the result ... This is how the Anglo-Saxons subjugated the world to themselves. The problem is that steps are not very common in nature, the world is rather a process. Well, Peter Jones bought so much that he was "enough". And John Peters? Did he succeed? There is never enough gingerbread for everyone!
                      "They" are not some forever definite monolith bound by discipline and common purpose. The wrong social system) This is a tangle of constantly fighting nasty creatures, constantly changing its composition. And their main goal is not at all in the implementation of some kind of plan. They trample each other, strangle, poison, destroy and spoil everything around them. Busy with the main thing - the destruction of the closest competitors. Everything else is of very little importance to them.
                      As a matter of fact, this is why the world is crumbling - in the fight between everyone and everyone, all methods take place, so that there is a continuous destruction of everything and everyone. All the systems of human life are deteriorating, because the next breakdown of something is the collapse of someone's position, which someone else is trying to achieve with all his might.
                      THEY will not rest on anything "achieved". They just can't. They will destroy the neighborhood, you and me and everyone else, destroy the world.
                      1. zenion
                        zenion 23 June 2021 17: 52
                        0
                        This is already like it was in the days of the USSR, when there was such an instruction among the people - take your neighbor, take the distant one, for the distant one can approach and take you. But I'm not Paul.
                      2. Mikhail3
                        Mikhail3 24 June 2021 09: 02
                        0
                        Battered truths are your style, Zinovy? I answered Pavel, the site moved the comment below.
  2. Aleksandre
    Aleksandre 22 June 2021 12: 27
    +5
    Quote: Dead Day
    but in real life, why ??? what for ?

    The West seems to have no need, it already takes everything it needs, but the main artless message of the article is quite understandable - let's rally around the king, father, we will suffer, become poor, but we will not shame the native billionaires, give the entire Top 10 Forbes! Moreover, what a war on the nose, you need to understand and be patient!
  3. Akuzenka
    Akuzenka 22 June 2021 12: 55
    0
    At the same time, in recent years, systematic work has been carried out to transform the territory of Western Europe (from Lisbon to Warsaw) into a single gigantic foothold for a future attack on Russia.
    Yes, okay, author, wail !!! If there is any threat to Russia, all the sons and daughters of "our" oligarchs, as one, will run to the military registration and enlistment offices, to fight the foe. And our "faces", such as Dani Milokhin, will lead the fighters into the attack !!!! Or am I somehow misinterpreting our propaganda?
  4. Kuroneko
    Kuroneko 22 June 2021 14: 37
    -2
    Quote: Dead Day
    from the outside, I would have believed .., but in real life, why ??? what for ? money flows, they all have accounts, the IMF dictates ... why the war?

    Because capitalism has been eating itself for a long time, and it has no time to wait until Russia withers away in its "friendly embrace." Too long. The process requires urgent acceleration, otherwise the system will collapse.

    In general, I have said for a long time and more than once that we are essentially living in the late 30s of the twentieth century. And a hot world war is inevitable.
    1. zenion
      zenion 22 June 2021 20: 23
      0
      You have forgotten that Russia is in the same system. You want to turn everything stolen here into air saturated with carbon and into ash two es. I remember from school - a chemist walked through the forest and started up two es.
      1. Kuroneko
        Kuroneko 22 June 2021 22: 48
        0
        Who are we and why exactly these WE want it? Take the trouble to explain first.
  5. bk316
    bk316 22 June 2021 17: 32
    -1
    They've been cooking for 75 years.
    Accounts are all garbage, but they can really freeze them, but this is a turnover, and they are fighting for capital.
    Population reduction is a long-term prospect, Europe will turn into a caliphate faster, or something else happens, they cannot risk it.
    So everything is written correctly.
  6. Normal ok
    Normal ok 22 June 2021 17: 54
    0
    Quote: Dead Day
    The West is preparing new for Russia on June 22
    from the outside, I would have believed .., but in real life, why ??? what for ? money flows, they all have accounts, the IMF dictates ... why the war? physically reduce the population? so there are covids ... cheap and angry ... there will be no more bloody battle. there will be a quiet reduction in the livestock.

    They took it off the tongue. Why risk everyone by starting a war when the current state of affairs suits them well? The Slavic population is dying out, the economy is in stagnation, resources are being exported to the west.
  • Bolt cutter
    Bolt cutter 22 June 2021 11: 11
    -3
    attraction to the service of foreign citizens who regularly and zealously serve for a handful of dollars and the prospect of obtaining US citizenship.
    In the US Army, those born abroad (and these are often already naturalized, that is, they do not need a passport, they already have) - five percent.
    https://www.fosterglobal.com/policy_papers/TheForeignBornInTheArmedServices.pdf
  • prior
    prior 22 June 2021 11: 13
    -6
    "The West is preparing new for Russia on June 22"

    Russia has already prepared a response to the West - on August 6 ... angry
    1. Aleksandre
      Aleksandre 22 June 2021 12: 21
      +3
      Quote: prior
      Russia has already prepared a response to the West - on August 6 ... angry

      International Beer Day?
      1. prior
        prior 22 June 2021 15: 32
        -5
        Not. It doesn't even smell like beer.
        If the "civilized" West is preparing for us on June 22 (treacherous attack), then why can't we answer it on August 6 (nuclear bombing of Hiroshima)?
        The Americans could put an end to the war in this way, but should we be ashamed?
        Whom? Those who will come to destroy us?
        1. Aleksandre
          Aleksandre 22 June 2021 16: 14
          +1
          Quote: prior
          If the "civilized" West is preparing for us on June 22 (treacherous attack), then why can't we answer it on August 6 (nuclear bombing of Hiroshima)?

          And the Japanese are for sho ?? wassat
          Seriously though, the joke about how the powers that be will glaze the western cities with their families living there is already old and completely unfunny.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • antivirus
    antivirus 22 June 2021 11: 21
    -8
    .ekiskem in eggulover yante

    good answer --- the color revolution in Mexico ................... but the HANDLES 'eggs should not be golden. A RUSTY
  • Israel
    Israel 22 June 2021 11: 34
    +12
    as if he had been to watered classes again

    The bloody withering away of capitalism, which by the beginning of the XNUMXth century swallowed up the entire planet, after which it began to devour itself, resulted in a continuous chain of wars for humanity


    Where did you see this withering away of capitalism, it will probably wither away in the future, but now it is actively growing and developing, this can be seen with a completely unarmed look.

    And then there was also a kitchen conspiracy theory arrived in time

    While Russia demonstrates relative unity before the aggression of the West and regularly fulfills all the instructions of the globalists (from the total digitalization of everything and everyone to the threat of massively vaccinating the entire population), the start of a full-scale war is postponed in favor of economic containment and military-political pressure.


    The countries that will most quickly lead the total digitalization (whatever the author means) will receive a greater development advantage in accelerating all processes from receiving social services. services to industrial processes, mass vaccination of the population and stopping the epidemic are also in the interests of any state.


    Having destroyed and robbed the USSR, the world capitalist system only postponed the systemic crisis that was tormenting it, which again broke out in 1998 and 2008. ...


    How did the world capitalist system rob the USSR, if I am not mistaken it was done by people on the ground, most of the Russian oligarchs, made their fortunes in the 90s.

    The share of Russia in the world economy fluctuates at the level of 1-2%. Even if China, Russia, Iran and the DPRK are united into a single military-political bloc (which has not yet been observed in principle), then, according to the most optimistic estimates, this share will increase to 25%.


    Why would China unite with Russia into a single military-political bloc? China feels great in the current capitalist system. Unification with the DPRK means only one thing, to take this country on the balance sheet. Iran has its own interests and ambitions.

    In general, a typical propaganda campaign Russia is surrounded by enemies.
    1. aglet
      aglet 22 June 2021 13: 09
      0
      "How did the world capitalist system rob the USSR, if I am not mistaken it was done by people on the ground, most of the Russian oligarchs, made their fortunes in the 90s"
      well yes it is. and they keep their honestly stolen funds in Sberbank, pay taxes in Russia, and invest in Tambov, Penza and Uryupinsk
    2. andybuts
      andybuts 22 June 2021 14: 28
      +2
      In general, a typical propaganda campaign Russia is surrounded by enemies.

      and do not say utter nonsense in the article. A mixture of facts and speculation, obvious problems with conclusions.

      but
      Where did you see this withering away of capitalism, it will probably wither away in the future, but now it is actively growing and developing, this can be seen with a completely unarmed look.

      This is very clear - the growth of inequality between the rich and the poor, the growth of debt burden of countries, the population and companies, the decline in business profitability, monopolization in many areas, the growth of tension between countries in the struggle for resources, contracts, contracts. Even the current crises cannot be resolved through the usual method for capitalism - the bankruptcy of weak companies due to social consequences, hence all these quantitative easing with the constant printing and injection of money into the economy. After all, capitalism has always developed through the expansion of sales markets and underwent purification through world wars, and now it is everywhere on Earth - how and where to grow. So the crisis is obvious, but it can drag on for centuries, as feudalism died out for about 5 centuries.

      How did the world capitalist system rob the USSR, if I am not mistaken it was done by people on the ground, most of the Russian oligarchs, made their fortunes in the 90s.

      you are wrong, local oligarchs are just the tip of the iceberg. The enrichment of world capitalism was due to:
      - new sales markets that were previously inaccessible (for example, equipment, cars, consumer goods, used Boeings and airbuses, which did not exist before, poured into the former socialist camp);
      - an influx of skilled and highly qualified low-paid labor, scientific and engineering personnel from the former USSR and the socialist camp;
      - elimination of a competitor represented by the industry of the USSR (or self-elimination). New owners came to enterprises, purchasing them for free, closing them down, selling equipment and raw materials at half price, for example, to China. As a result, both the owners and their buyers are positive, and the state is negative (as the former owner and workers of the enterprise);
      - tightening of labor markets, toughening of the struggle against the trade union and labor movement, curtailment of rights, wages and other achievements of the working process, the transfer of production to countries with low wages - all this as a consequence of the collapse of the state of workers and peasants;
      - self-elimination of the main military enemy, which made it possible to reduce defense spending.
      Well, our oligarchs park their main capital in capital countries, their main expenses are there, in Russia they only have profitable assets to receive dividends and withdraw them abroad.
      So the robbery was and was very big
      1. Israel
        Israel 22 June 2021 17: 20
        +2
        This is very clear - the growth of inequality between the rich and the poor, the growth of debt burden of countries, the population and companies, the decline in business profitability, monopolization in many areas, the growth of tension between countries in the struggle for resources, contracts, contracts. Even the current crises cannot be resolved through the usual method for capitalism - the bankruptcy of weak companies due to social consequences, hence all these quantitative easing with the constant printing and injection of money into the economy. After all, capitalism has always developed through the expansion of sales markets and underwent purification through world wars, and now it is everywhere on Earth - how and where to grow. So the crisis is obvious, but it can drag on for centuries, as feudalism died out for about 5 centuries.


        This is the "normal" existence of capitalism, the rich get richer, the poor get poorer, the state or revolutions equalize the balance and so on in a circle. And as for the development of capitalism, over the past 20 years, a huge number of new markets have been formed, the Internet, telecommunications, and now they are preparing to master the gigantic market of "decarbonization". Next comes the market for electric vehicles, etc.

        - new sales markets that were previously inaccessible (for example, equipment, cars, consumer goods, used Boeings and airbuses, which did not exist before, poured into the former socialist camp);
        - an influx of skilled and highly qualified low-paid labor, scientific and engineering personnel from the former USSR and the socialist camp;


        All this can be counted and the market of the former USSR can be compared with the market of the EU or China, not to mention the United States. If the market of the former USSR was so huge that it saved world capitalism, then it is strange that the share of the countries of the former USSR in the world economy is not at all large.


        - elimination of a competitor represented by the industry of the USSR (or self-elimination). New owners came to enterprises, purchasing them for free, closing them down, selling equipment and raw materials at half price, for example, to China. As a result, both the owners and their buyers are positive, and the state is negative (as the former owner and workers of the enterprise);


        New owners did not come from the United States either, but from local ones, from former directors of Soviet enterprises to athletes. And the enterprises were closed not from a good life, in market conditions, a large segment of the industry of the former USSR was not competitive.


        tougher labor markets, tougher struggle against the trade union and labor movement, curtailment of rights, wages and other achievements of the working process, the transfer of production to countries with low wages - all this as a result of the collapse of the state of workers and peasants;


        In the West, the trade unions have tremendous power and are able to "fence" even a serious corporation of the Airbus level, then in modern Russia it is not the fault and intent of the "world capitalists" otherwise.

        Well, our oligarchs park their main capital in capital countries, their main expenses are there, in Russia they only have profitable assets to receive dividends and withdraw them abroad.
        So the robbery was and was very big


        The fact that the robbery was, I do not argue with this, but they were robbed by their own former citizens of the USSR, former members of the CPSU, etc.
        1. andybuts
          andybuts 23 June 2021 11: 25
          0
          This is the "normal" existence of capitalism, the rich get richer, the poor get poorer

          So this is the most important contradiction of capitalism between the social mode of production and the private way of appropriating the results of labor.

          All this can be counted and the market of the former USSR can be compared with the market of the EU or China, not to mention the United States. If the market of the former USSR was so huge that it saved world capitalism, then it is strange that the share of the countries of the former USSR in the world economy is not at all large.

          Well, if we compare the countries of the former USSR now after 30 years of degradation. In 1990, the share of the USSR was 15-20% of the world economy, China was about 2-3%. The countries of the former USSR grew much slower than not only the world economy, but also more slowly than the developed countries. And almost half of the time the growth was negative, despite the fact that the Russian Federation still showed not the worst result (compare with Ukraine or Tajikistan). Therefore, the share of the total USSR has become much lower than it was before. Plus add Eastern Europe, Vietnam, which also received Western exporters, and who also donated the same cheap labor force.
          Only the net export of capital and only from the Russian Federation since 1994, about 800 billion dollars, only 2006-2007 were marked by the import of capital into the Russian Federation. I don’t think there are any fundamental differences in other Soviet republics.

          In the West, the trade unions have tremendous power and are able to "fence" even a serious corporation of the Airbus level, then in modern Russia it is not the fault and intent of the "world capitalists" otherwise.

          I agree, in the West, not everything is as bad with the labor movement as in our country, but there is still research that suggests that the situation is worsening. This can be seen in the decline in the share of the middle class in developed countries (yes, by 3-4%), but at the expense of the growth of the poor. Although during the existence of the USSR, the trend was the opposite, which is directly with the presence of a socialist state.

          The fact that the robbery was, I do not argue with this, but they were robbed by their own former citizens of the USSR, former members of the CPSU, etc.

          But this does not mean that the West did not benefit from this.
    3. zenion
      zenion 22 June 2021 20: 28
      -1
      Israel. Slavery was several thousand years old. For several centuries there was feudalism. Two centuries the bourgeoisie. Reforms are happening faster each time. One hundred and fifty years of capitalism. He's running out. A ghost walks the planet, a rotten ghost. And it all started with the revolution in the United States.
      1. Israel
        Israel 22 June 2021 21: 16
        +1
        I'm not sure, given the growth of the economy (even in a crisis and epidemic), capitalism is now in its prime. The main function of capitalism is to increase capital and make a profit. There may be more than one war, financial crises, bankruptcies of entire states, but capitalism will not go anywhere as long as there is an opportunity (or need) to make a profit.
        Capitalism existed even in the USSR with its shadow market, guilds, and in the USSR, capitalism and the market had to be fought by forceful methods, otherwise it would have flourished and suppressed the planned economy.
        The fact that capitalism is the same temporary phenomenon as slavery, feudalism, I agree, but there is a suspicion that even my children will not live to see the end of capitalism.
        1. zenion
          zenion 22 June 2021 21: 34
          0
          You are in vain! God works in mysterious ways! Why are you so about your children, I would wish them and I wish to live to see everything possible.
  • spectr
    spectr 22 June 2021 11: 35
    +3
    If we proceed from what the author invented here, then it must be a Russia-China or Russia-Turkey conflict. And given the fact that we feed on technology from China, only Turkey remains. Everything else will not reach the required scale. The conflict with Georgia has shown this.
  • dzvero
    dzvero 22 June 2021 11: 36
    +3
    There are many letters, but there is no answer to the two most important questions - who benefits from the "hot" war and under what conditions it can start. I agree with one thing - at the moment the West is on the verge of a foul and its "window" is close to closing because, according to forecasts, in 2027 China will overtake the United States. In the next few years, the USA will try to (1) drive a wedge between the Russian Federation and the PRC, (2) "set fire to" existing "hot spots", (3) cause problems in the economy, (4) create conditions for a successful first strike while minimizing the risk retaliatory strike.
  • poputchik
    poputchik 22 June 2021 11: 46
    -1
    if a fight is inevitable? winners are not judged!
    1. zenion
      zenion 22 June 2021 23: 56
      +1
      There will be no winners. There will be no one to judge. In World War II, at a modest figure, about 60 million people died, the United States did not get hooked, civilians. Now the United States will not sit out overseas. If there is a strong mess, it may happen that people think that it is much easier to ditch the United States than to ditch everyone. As the Americans were opened, so they will be closed. As far as history is known, when the barbarians from the German levs attacked Rome, then from the outside, although they were not invited to Rome, they were attacked by a bunch of super barbarians who had arrived. About which no one has a rumor or a spirit. They bought off the German barbarians, while others broke all the dishes in Rome, along with the owners. At one time, looking at US policy, Mark Twain wrote - it would be better if Columbus sailed by.
  • HAM
    HAM 22 June 2021 11: 47
    +5
    Article-sort of much is true, but the feeling is bad ... "the truncated is gone ..... Schatz offers to surrender!"
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 22 June 2021 12: 41
      -1
      Quote: HAM
      The article seems to be true a lot, but the feeling is bad ... "The truncated is gone ..... Schatz offers to give up!"

      Why should we be afraid, we survived the WWII, we survived the civil war, we survived the WWII, and there is also restructuring, collapse, fire, water and copper pipes. So we'll survive the rest, albeit a little scary.
  • Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 22 June 2021 11: 49
    +22
    There are a lot of cranberry clichés about the aggressive and cunning west. But it didn't work out clearly why the West itself needs to attack us.
    Take a look around - we already sell Western products. Our market is open to their competitive products - well, yes, we have pushed their agricultural products out, well, yes, something has been jerked off by Asia - otherwise the picture is the same. That is, having conquered us, "they" will not receive a "vacuum market" that will happily suck in tons of their products and will cheerfully spit profits comparable to the costs of such an operation.
    Are we strongly interfering with the West politically?) Where exactly? Under a warm barrel with Nicolas Maduro? Maybe in tiny Syria? Since the 2000s, the West has managed to drag Georgia, Moldova, Azerbaijan, Ukraine out of our zone of influence - and this is the zone of our close influence. We have long since lost our former opportunities in Vietnam, Cuba, Africa, Eastern Europe. That is, our foreign policy is not a kind of "bone in the throat" or an insurmountable obstacle for the West. With the exception of the "sort of" Blr, we no longer have external "bastions."
    Maybe we threaten the West with some kind of military initiatives? And again, no - our economy does not allow us to develop the pace of military development suitable for the honorary title "militarist of the decade" - our arsenals are being updated, but quantitatively decreasing, and most importantly, we are inferior in modernizing a wide front of products, which has been repeatedly written here.
    Well, okay, maybe the West has some interests in what we don't trade with? And again, no. Because we sell EVERYTHING to the West. Energy carriers, rare earths, lumber, etc., etc. There is no limit to the happiness of our elites when there is an opportunity to float something new over the hill - because this is money for a luxurious life and toys for big boys.
    And finally, can we somehow culturally "loosen" the bonds of the Western world?
    Are we sabotaging, so to speak, providing some kind of effective antagonistic model?
    And again, no - the amount of our cultural production both inside (our near zone) and outside is negligible in comparison with the collective western one. I'm not even talking about the quality, elaboration and commercial depth of the product's potential - the quantity is stupid. For 30 years now we have not been able to give birth to a coherent post-Soviet idea for the near zone, what kind of "cultural sabotage" can we talk about?
    Compared to the Western statistics of teenage suicides or divorces, we do not have any tangible advantages. The fact that some "our model" is healthier and "vital" is a bluff and an illusion, in terms of% the number of homosexuals in our country will be about the same as in the West on average. It is for this reason (and because of the standard of living, etc.) that we do not observe general migration from the "pernicious West" to us - we are neither an alternative, nor a challenge, nor a cultural and moral threat to the West.

    A large-scale attack on the Russian Federation would be extremely costly, it would require an overextension of the efforts of the West and the diversion of resources from the BW and from Asia. Probably, the operation itself would also take some time. Probably, in addition to this, there would be significant destruction in a number of neighboring European states, at least.
    What would be the prize, the prize? Yes, no.
    1. mikh-korsakov
      mikh-korsakov 22 June 2021 12: 21
      0
      Knell! There is no gain, but there is a profit. Bearing in mind the growth of appropriations for armaments in NATO. Therefore, the author is WRONG in that the author is preparing for a war with Russia. But the author is right that the West is increasing its military power. But this is not for the purpose of aggression, but for the purpose of "what if, what if ..." But suddenly it will not be, because suddenly it is not needed here either. Our president plays diplomacy, sometimes puffs his cheeks. But this is just a game. There is no ammunition, but there are no ambitions either.
      1. Knell wardenheart
        Knell wardenheart 22 June 2021 12: 47
        +1
        No, well, it's clear they are arming themselves. There they treat this as a false plexus of business, feeding troughs for R&D, loading key enterprises and, of course, defense too. It is just that there is no specific reason for us to go and bury us - we assimilate ourselves very well in terms of dynamics, as for me. Over the past 30 years, if you look at it soberly, we have little left of the "illusions of the past". Young generations are mentally western to the core, someone is mentally oriental, I would say culturally Japaneseized) One or two generations and we will join the West, if some powerful trigger does not happen.
        1. mikh-korsakov
          mikh-korsakov 22 June 2021 14: 10
          -1
          Knell. There is a trigger, it is also a multivibrator, but the vibrations are fading to a sweet song about the heroism of past years. And the point is not the absence, as some believe the wise Stalin, who thinks about the people. My late father-in-law worked before the war at a military plant and was 20 minutes late for work, so he was tried and sat for 60 days. So about affection to the people - no need for songs. Nevertheless, on June 22, I went to the military registration and enlistment office to enroll. The point, IMHO, is not among the people, but in technical progress, tick-tok is an excellent lulling. Today's children, if you haven't rummaged in your phone for a couple of hours, the day has passed in vain, in this you are right.
      2. Shiden
        Shiden 22 June 2021 12: 54
        -3
        You know what the problem is in explaining what the "Russian world" is and with what it is eaten, no one will clearly explain not the president, deputies, propagandists, and the west is insured. I have not heard something from the politicians of Western countries that there is a "French world" "English world" "German world" Yes, every nation of Europe has its own identity and the Germans do not impose on the Swiss or Austrians the postulate that they are brothers and once entered the Holy Roman Empire ...
    2. zenion
      zenion 23 June 2021 00: 02
      +1
      Knell Wardenheart. The West wants to use Russia in a particularly sophisticated way. Tell me, why the hell did Napoleon need Russia when he had all of Europe? The same can be asked, but it was not enough for Hitler that the entire industry of Europe worked for the Germans. So he was drawn, that is, he was created for this, again for the destruction of the USSR, they say, Yuds and communists live there, that this is the same thing. But after all, no one writes about where Hitler got so much money from that he sewed a uniform for the entire SA? The Germans did not give him this money, America has no right to lie about this.
    3. Aleksandr21
      Aleksandr21 23 June 2021 12: 09
      0
      Quote: Knell Wardenheart
      But it didn't work out clearly why the West itself needs to attack us.


      Can you justify NATO's approach to our borders, designating Russia as an adversary (both in NATO documents and in the United States)? The fact that preparations are underway for a big war is a fact. The missile defense system in Europe is also aimed at limiting nuclear weapons - Russia, and so far all the actions of the global West indicate such preparations (for a big war).

      Why attack? Territory, resources, and huge profits of the military-industrial complex - USA + suppress any dissent, against Western civilization, look at Poland, France, Germany, Japan - they are part of the Anglo-Saxon model (in political, economic, cultural, mental, military - terms), Russia - China - Iran - North Korea - Cuba - what unites them? Besides that they are not democracies? They are outside this model, but they interact with it, trade, have political connections, etc. but they do not belong to it .... now imagine if the West does not have opponents and all civilizations reformat under this model .... what could be next? The global project is a single government, uniform criteria for all mankind, uniform rules, etc. or maybe a big war is needed to write off debts + redistribution of spheres of influence + profits of the military-industrial complex. This, too, can be .... therefore, nothing can be ruled out.
      1. Knell wardenheart
        Knell wardenheart 23 June 2021 12: 47
        0
        Can you justify NATO's approach to our borders, designating Russia as an adversary (both in NATO documents and in the United States)?

        This status has been hanging for 70 years already. Both the enemy and the approach to the borders. If NATO was planning a military operation - better time than any 90s not to come up with - the alliance collapsed, production chains are disrupted. But they didn't attack - so why would they do it now?

        The fact that preparations are underway for a big war is a fact.

        I will tell you a secret - there is always someone in the world preparing for a "big war". Someone is always dissatisfied, has a coin for the development of weapons and appetites for the lands of neighbors. It can be called in different ways - someone calls it "defense", someone else calls it "planned modernization of forces," someone else calls it "strengthening the Armed Forces." Sometimes it is not so easy to catch who and in what config is going to be (and relative to whom) - remember the same BB2, in which the Anglo-French had more tanks and aircraft before the war than the Germans. But then the Germans attacked. So militarization itself cannot be interpreted as some kind of phenomenon that unequivocally indicates an offensive policy - the pre-war USSR also increased its strength and had the largest army in Europe - but it was attacked.

        The missile defense system in Europe is also aimed at limiting nuclear weapons - Russia

        Any defense system is aimed at limiting the offensive potential. It is not surprising that the EU, which is reducing its armaments, is investing in defense on the borders of the EU - from the side of the state with significant amounts of strategic / tactical weapons. The other side of the issue is that at one time we could initiate negotiations on a nuclear-free status of Europe - but instead chose to retain influence by force.

        I do not argue with your thesis about preparations for a "big war" - but I point out that so far NOTHING points to a potential initiator of this war, and even more so to its main geography. The most stressful region now is Asia. Then comes BV. Then the European direction. Compared to the buildup of forces and rhetoric in Asia and the BV, we have here just a "club of old friends."

        Why attack? Territory, resources, and huge profits of the military-industrial complex - USA + suppress any dissent, against Western civilization

        I gave a more or less detailed answer to all this. At the moment, we are extracting these resources on a whole infrastructure and selling them to the West. In the event of war, infrastructure will suffer - mining, logistics, labor will be knocked out. It will take investment and time. Ie these will be empty costs. Territory - at the disposal of the Americans 1 whole continent - maybe the territory of the Russian Federation. About half of which is occupied by the same useless land as most of ours. But all this does not need to be transported by sea - the question is - are they just fiercely frantically rushing to Alaska and Canada with their business? Not. If we are talking about other EU countries, it is worth noting that since the days of Drang nach Osten, the EU countries have very steeply charged their agriculture, abruptly ours. Their populations are no longer in danger of hunger - and demographics indicate population decline, not growth. Consequently, they have no need for "territories" - they live richly and well-fed.
        Huge profit of the military-industrial complex ?! That is, like the Americans will seize our military-industrial complex (it's amazing how it can be "captured" in the event of a large-scale war) - and then what, will they drive Kalash and S-400 to Iran?) This is absurd.
        Zy - we do not have "dissent" with the West sufficient to objectively consider that this is our advantage, contributing to the migration of minds and capital from the West to us. The opposite is true.

        Look at the large world projects (like ITER or the ISS of the same or the LHC) - they all have one thing in common, they cost DOHRENA. Ask yourself a question - would Iran, North Korea, China, Russia, Cuba - pull all this in cooperation? Would they initiate these projects and manage to assign roles to them? The answer is 90% NO. Some kind of "alternative" anti-Western world has not existed for quite a long time - if there was a boy. The West possesses a complex of minds and means incomparable with the aggregate power of the active "anti-West" - in case of aggravation of antagonism, we will simply be left out of a number of projects, the train will go further, and we will stir up something in Dubna or design ROSS. This is the real state of affairs on the anti-globalization front.
        1. Aleksandr21
          Aleksandr21 23 June 2021 14: 21
          0
          Quote: Knell Wardenheart

          If NATO was planning a military operation - better time than any 90s not to come up with - the alliance collapsed, production chains are broken. But they didn't attack - so why would they do it now?


          In the 90s - Russia completely fell under the West (under Yeltsin), almost the entire elite and state structures carried out the will of the West and carried out reforms under the direction of the United States .... what has changed now? Russia partially restored its sovereignty and withdrew from the process - the purpose of which was to integrate Russia into the Western project ... this is about Russia, now with regard to the West, why not then but now ... well, first of all, the West was fine then, The USSR collapsed - the world became unipolar, the West developed technologies and mastered new markets .... what now? The unipolar world is over, other centers of influence have appeared + the West has problems with sales markets, i.e. high competition from China - which squeezes the US share in trade, then there is a problem with the accumulation of debts and bubbles in the financial markets, if you look at the global financial crises, they go in cycles and each time the cycle shrinks and shrinks ... and the best a way to solve all problems in one fell swoop, this is a big war, there is really nothing new here. They will write off debts, the military-industrial complex will earn a lot of money + they will remove a competitor / competitors and return the world to a unipolar world ... or perhaps a new world order will be built on ruins, with a single government and uniform rules, this option is possible.


          Quote: Knell Wardenheart
          I do not argue with your thesis about preparations for a "big war" - but I point out that so far NOTHING points to a potential initiator of this war, and even more so to its main geography.


          NATO and the United States have already identified their opponents, officially, there are documents in which it is clearly indicated who the enemy is and against whom the West is preparing military measures. The same missile defense system in Europe, they began to prepare it almost from the 2000s, in 2006, experts from the US Defense Ministry visited Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary to start implementing this system ... and then any sane person understands what they wanted in Poland deploy a missile defense system not against Iran, but to contain Russia's nuclear potential. I am already silent about the West's promise not to expand NATO ... further, the deployment of NATO troops in the Baltic States and the expansion of military infrastructure throughout Europe. Who is it to prepare against? Are there any opponents of NATO in the region where it is difficult to determine the geography? At one time, Russia even wanted to join NATO, but was refused. Russia also tried to agree on a missile defense system in Europe in order to make a common security architecture and get guarantees that the missile defense system is not directed against our country, but also a refusal + almost everything is ready for the implementation of a military scenario against Russia, this will not necessarily happen in the next couple of years , but the likelihood of this is huge ... and if such a decision is made, then it can happen very quickly, the implementation of Prompt Global Strike will continue according to the scenario.

          Quote: Knell Wardenheart
          At the moment, we are extracting these resources on a whole infrastructure and selling them to the West. In the event of war, infrastructure will suffer - mining, logistics, labor will be knocked out. It will take investment and time. Ie these will be empty costs.


          And how does the sale of resources exclude military action? Here the logic does not always work, ours in 2014 also thought that since they were selling energy resources to the EU, there would be no sanctions from Europe, how wrong they were ... and it is doubtful that the United States would be so worried about the Russian infrastructure, i.e. if there is a war with Russia, it will completely change the balance of power in the world, and even if the factories and factories suffer, they will be restored .... again, if you speculate, then after the implementation of a global strike, when the air defense / missile defense system is broken through and the military infrastructure of Russia by their European allies, they will transfer forces to Eastern Europe and there they will already wave off to the Western part of Russia; The Caucasus and the Kuban will be occupied by the Turkish Armed Forces (a huge army with good weapons), the Far East - Japan .... only Siberia and some small territories remain where hybrid means of war can be used, i.e. there will be no complete destruction of the population, but in this scenario, it is likely that Russia will be split into many states, under the control of puppet governments.

          Regarding the price and whether it is worth it .... if it is profitable, then it will be implemented. In this case, the US military-industrial complex will definitely earn just gigantic money on orders, the West will also receive new territories with huge reserves of resources that can be obtained for a pittance, and not at market prices. They will take away one of the centers of influence, and in the event of a global war - all other centers of influence and return to a unipolar world + (provided, again, a global conflict) there is an opportunity to write off debts, there is such an opinion:

          The big war is a reliable means of solving all these problems. As a force majeure circumstance (force majeure), the war will release from contractual obligations. The machine will allow you to defer debt payments, and then devalue and write off debts. AND! organizes "natural population decline".


          and in such a scenario, the benefits will outweigh the losses.
          1. Knell wardenheart
            Knell wardenheart 23 June 2021 15: 16
            0
            1) The current government in the Russian Federation has practically the same figures (or their ideological followers) who pursued policies in the 90s. What is our "independent policy"? In the 90s, the still fresh CIS looked into our mouths and there was economic cooperation with the post-soviets, now there are pitiful scraps of the CIS - but you see some kind of force or threat in this. If we compare with the 90s, then our potential (to threaten the West) has only decreased - our economic stability has improved somewhat, but this was achieved at the cost of the very integration with the West (financial), unprecedented even in the 90s. If tomorrow, by wave of a magic wand, impose sanctions on us a la Iranian, you will very soon see the full scale of our integration with the West. Which is only of age from the 90s, I will repeat myself. Then we had production chains with the countries of the former Soviet Union and enterprises within the country had not yet gone bankrupt - now all this is in the past. Why would the West attack its economic appendage?

            2) All these paperbacks in which NATO goals and NATO opponents are spelled out, and other memoranda, "white papers", etc. - all this is muculature. In a real situation, politics takes shape very quickly, and the politicians themselves change their shoes. Suffice it to recall how they instantly turned the anti-Bolshevik line in the West, as soon as they were in the same boat with the USSR. Or how NATO and I have mutually cooperated on Afghanistan since the 2000s.
            At one time, Russia even wanted to join NATO, but was refused

            The devil is in the details - and the details are as follows - they refused us because we did not want to "enter", we wanted to bend and remake a part of the system, which had already been suitable for half a century. Of course, we were refused - they did not see the point in this.
            almost everything is ready for the implementation of a military scenario against Russia

            I recommend that you briefly familiarize yourself with the comparison of NATO forces in Europe and Russian forces in the European direction. I mean the available forces - tanks, artillery, aviation, strategic and tactical complexes, etc. And then compare it with NATO resources in principle.

            3)
            And how does the sale of resources exclude military action?

            Any military campaign always has a benefit that shapes / influences the goal. Your reasoning suggests that everything should be this way, because because. Turkey, which you are talking about now, has the task of taking control of huge areas in the BV - which it, choking, is trying to do. They do not need land in the Russian Federation - in the next 30 years for sure.
            The seizure of the "new territories" by the "West" will be associated with a complete reshaping of the balance of European politics - Poland will finally organize its "intermarium" and the longed-for confederation - it will not need either the EU or NATO. Turkey, in the event of the seizure of the Caucasus and the strengthening of the Black Sea positions, will also not need NATO and will return to anti-Western antagonism. A free and strengthened Turkey along the Sauddite-Pakistan line will form a bloc with China - which in aggregate will be much worse for the West than the current configuration. Much worse.
            The current states are controlled by the West, including because of their personal limited capabilities - in the event of the destruction of this system, we automatically return to the times before the strengthening of the Russian Empire.

            Regarding the price and whether it is worth ... if it is profitable, then it will be implemented

            What I am talking about is sleep well for the next 10-12 years, until it is profitable even close.

            4) mass "release of contractual obligations" in the conditions of modern globalism - will cause a hellish world financial crisis and activate gold and foreign exchange settlements in conditions of an actual freeze or bankruptcy. This is extremely disadvantageous for America because the crisis reduces the purchasing power of high-tech and luxury goods of the United States around the world, reducing its exports, but at the same time not reducing its imports. She will have to pay in gold and suffer damage on transport communications. US domestic debt will grow even more because a major war will bankrupt insurance companies, owners of transport property will either flood the government with claims, or go bankrupt themselves. Manufacturers will fly after them, property prices will fall, and so on and so forth. It will be a collapse - and most importantly, it will be a collapse of the dollar. Regardless of further events, a crypt or other currency tied to a metal equivalent will come to replace it. A major war will ruin the US economy - and they understand this very well, putting a lot of effort into preventing a MAJOR war from happening.
            1. Aleksandr21
              Aleksandr21 23 June 2021 16: 20
              0
              Quote: Knell Wardenheart
              1) What is our "independent policy"


              In a policy that corresponds to the interests of the Russian Federation and not the West, it’s just worth looking back at the 90s and how it was ... Yeltsin completely surrendered the interests of our country, with GDP (despite the ambiguous domestic and foreign policy), the reverse process began, if after he came to power with the West there was "peace, friendship, chewing gum", then relations also changed over time, especially the turning point was indicated in 2007 at the Munich conference where our interests were declared, then there was a war with Georgia in 2008 (where Russia had fulfill their obligations as a peacemaker and respond to Georgia's aggression with the tacit support of the United States - Saakashvili), then there was a coup d'etat in Ukraine in 2014 and the return of Crimea, and already at the turn of 18-20 a certain alliance between Russia and China and a confrontation with the Western bloc was formed ... Russia has interests in Africa, BV (Syria, etc.), the CIS (where some of the countries are part of the EAEU), etc. and for sure Russia is not acting in the interests of the West ... otherwise Crimea would be returned, and together they would have started to press China, etc ...

              In the 90s, the still fresh CIS was looking into our mouths and there was economic cooperation with the post-soviets, now there are pitiful scraps of the CIS - but you see some kind of force or threat in this.


              The fact that the CIS was left with miserable pieces is the merit of the West, which, after the collapse of the USSR, began to absorb new territories and draw the former Soviet republics into their integration processes (EU, NATO, etc.), while Russia at that moment (and even now good) opportunities are limited, the West is richer and has a lot of technology, the market is bigger + controlled by many international organizations ... so the choice of these republics is obvious, but this did not affect Russia's military capabilities in opposing the West.

              The devil is in the details - and the details are as follows - they refused us because we did not want to "enter", we wanted to bend and remake a part of the system, which had already been suitable for half a century.


              So the system had to be redone anyway, NATO was created against whom? Against the USSR, which at that time collapsed and there was simply no sense in the existence of this organization .... Russia also wanted to become a part of this structure, of course, taking into account its interests and this is normal, everyone would benefit from this. But Washington clearly had other plans ... once again in the 2000s, a missile defense system against Russia began to form, when there was no Munich conference yet, let alone 2008 and 2014 with well-known events.

              in the next 10-12 years, until it is profitable even close.


              It depends on those who make the decision ... they decide that the time has come and the mechanisms will start spinning, there is not even a need to come up with a special reason, there are a huge number of frozen conflicts around Russia, to unfreeze any of them - to intervene (NATO) and then follow the scenario. A particularly hot spot is Donbass, if Zelensky, with the approval of the West, decides to clean up the LPNR, then Russia cannot but intervene, and then everything can be.

              mass "release of contractual obligations" in the conditions of modern globalism - will cause a hellish world financial crisis


              There will be a global crisis in any case, printing presses do not stop, a huge amount of paper has been thrown into the markets, bubbles in stock markets have not burst yet and how all this will be settled, no one knows ... if the whole system flies, then the standard of living in the West is overwhelming will fall, there will be waves of bankruptcies and falls of global corporations, but in any case it will be. And if at this time, to arrange another global war ... then why not? And to build a new world on the ruins ... of course now it sounds like fantasy, but this is a likely scenario.
  • Tagan
    Tagan 22 June 2021 11: 49
    +3
    In my opinion, the author has simplified the reality a little. Here, a simple addition with a subsequent comparison of the economies of the opposing sides is not enough for an assessment. This is more relevant for waging a protracted military conflict.
    Separately, none of the states' henchmen wants to fall under the distribution. Yes, they can nudge, swear allegiance. But everyone (or almost everyone))) knows that the states have vassals - consumables. So the inviolability of this union is questionable.
    In addition, many surmise that in this situation Russia will act as brutally as possible using the entire arsenal, due to the fact that it will have no other choice.
  • Dmitry V.
    Dmitry V. 22 June 2021 11: 54
    +6
    the process of destruction of the Russian world

    Since when did the Natsiks get the right to write whatever they like on the margins of the VO?

    We live in the Urals with Tatars, Bashkirs, Kazakhs, Udmurts and dozens of other nationalities - what kind of "Russian world" are you talking about here - the Natsik forest!
    1. Vasia
      Vasia 23 June 2021 11: 15
      0
      Since when did the Natsiks get the right to write whatever they like on the margins of the VO?

      What kind of insanity are you talking about?
  • tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 22 June 2021 11: 55
    -9
    There will be no war as long as the United States knows that they are powerless against our response. And in the development of strategic nuclear forces and air defense missile systems, we are ahead of the rest of the planet. The project of shisyan and the cutlet did not work, but rather united. Everything will end with the distribution of spheres of influence. Peacefully.
    1. zenion
      zenion 23 June 2021 00: 06
      -1
      Will we throw in caps or berets? We have such slingshots that there are no analogues in the whole world.
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 23 June 2021 00: 17
        +1
        And what do they have to stop our ICBMs?
    2. Vasia
      Vasia 23 June 2021 11: 20
      +1
      Everything will end with the distribution of spheres of influence, peacefully.

      God grant. It's just that the "Anglo-Saxons" (the ruling elite of the Western world) do not give up what they consider to be theirs.
  • Igoresha
    Igoresha 22 June 2021 12: 02
    +2
    well, we need to rally around the leader and not whine
    1. Esaul
      Esaul 22 June 2021 16: 17
      +1
      The last leader died many decades ago, and now there is only one riffraff.
  • BAI
    BAI 22 June 2021 12: 11
    +2
    What do we see now?

    Now we see that there is nuclear weapons, which makes a global war meaningless. If earlier all wars were fought to conquer territories and resources (and now local wars without nuclear weapons are fought for this), now this will not happen. There will be contaminated territories that are not suitable for life. Moreover, for all - both for the "winners" (if any) and for the vanquished. Everyone will have completely unacceptable population losses. What's the point in starting a war?
    1. Tank jacket
      Tank jacket 22 June 2021 12: 28
      0
      I agree, but to arrange sabotage, sabotage, education of the generation of Tiktokers, incitement to riots, the implementation of color revolutions is as much as you like ...
      1. zenion
        zenion 23 June 2021 00: 13
        0
        What do you know in this body. After all, the most important thing is not war, but fear together with rallying around this and that, and do not think that the rich live easily. You ate something in front of the bed and under the covers. And he is the poor man who is spinning his brains, where to hide this money, after all, they are stolen. BAI, is there any concern about population losses right now? Behind the gates are those who also want to become billionaires, just let him go to the hammer. They do not have the knowledge that in Russia those who have yachts did not get them so easily. In the evening they sharpened a knife, and in the morning they counted money in the nightstand, and then overseas.
  • Tank jacket
    Tank jacket 22 June 2021 12: 17
    +1
    The most powerful, invincible, which knew the joy of victories, the Soviet army could not save the USSR. A strong army is certainly important, but now there are hybrid, informational, ideological wars (LGBT, Russophobia, the cult of betrayal, distortion of history), with the help of coups d'états, betrayal of the elites (recall the party nomenclature that destroyed the USSR).
    1. zenion
      zenion 23 June 2021 00: 15
      0
      So the people were stupefied to the point that the people thought they would get rid of the nomenclature, and their nomenclature got rid of everything. But the people remember and are still silent. Rakes and pitchforks sharpen. I picked it up and waved across myself to a cart or truck.
  • Petrik66
    Petrik66 22 June 2021 12: 19
    +8
    Let's all go and hang ourselves or drown ourselves, since that's all. Everything was gone ... but why didn't the USA and the Eurofascists attack us in 2000? Probably out of nobility, a sense of chivalry - innate, did not allow them to attack a weak enemy. Not the winner's laurels. Now, we will wait another three years and begin, we will move to Moscow (do not take prisoners). They're luring us in, oh they're luring us in. It is good that there is Sergei Rusov, he warned this option in advance and in reality, we will kill ourselves and will not give them a triumph. Babich will drive to Moscow on the Abrams, but we are not, everyone is already ............... They will be upset.
    The author, do not read Soviet newspapers at night, you will not be so swollen with amateurish horrors.
    1. Daniil Konovalenko
      Daniil Konovalenko 22 June 2021 12: 40
      +2
      The insidious West acts on the principle:
      - Let's wait until the bassoons die of hunger there! Well, or weaken ... (c) smile
  • markant1970
    markant1970 22 June 2021 12: 24
    +5
    Even nostalgia struck, as if I had read the latest issue of Pravda.
    1. Daniil Konovalenko
      Daniil Konovalenko 22 June 2021 12: 37
      +5
      To be honest, Pravda didn't write anything like that either. smile
      1. markant1970
        markant1970 22 June 2021 12: 39
        -1
        The very "spirit" of the article
        1. Daniil Konovalenko
          Daniil Konovalenko 22 June 2021 12: 41
          +2
          The "spirit" of the article is similar to Samsonov's corporation. Probably a graduate. smile
  • Daniil Konovalenko
    Daniil Konovalenko 22 June 2021 12: 26
    +9
    The purpose of this type of war is to change the cultural and civilizational essence of the state-forming people and to remove them from the rights to their own subsoil and resources.
    It turns out that I also have subsoil and resources ... Oh, yeah, Gazprom is a national treasure in the sense of mine ... And my Rusal and the oil companies are also mine ... It turns out that I raise the prices for gasoline laughing Give Christ, for the sake of, "a beggar oligarch", the salary is not enough for the construction of an aircraft carrier to protect the wealth listed above from adversaries.
  • Roman070280
    Roman070280 22 June 2021 12: 32
    +2
    Oh, are they fighting the evil West again with might and main ??
    Time to run for popcorn ..))
  • Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 22 June 2021 12: 43
    +4
    JUNE 1941 "prepared not only" external enemies ": Nazi Germany and its allies! But also" internal enemies "...! Incompetent" employees "(officials) in the state apparatus and industry, in agriculture, in the armed forces ... advancement on the "career ladder" not for real merits, intelligence and talents; but thanks to mutual responsibility, toadying ... also played a significant role! Non-fulfillment of production plans, delayed replacement and development of new equipment in the country's economy, slow production of new weapons, insufficiently organized the development of these weapons, insufficiently organized training in new methods of modern warfare - a lot of this has developed, "thanks" to the fact that in the leadership of the economy (national economy) of the state, in the leadership of the armed forces there were "enough" many careerists who were good at sneaking, groveling , "drown" smarter, more capable competitors; but did not match their intelligence, competencepositions!
    It's a thing of the past ... But I mean ... is it not observed (is happening) in Russia now? I believe that a lot is "going on" in the country, which makes it difficult to successfully confront "external enemies"! Which will make it even more difficult in the future! Earlier, the memory was still fresh in the "period of stagnation" ... apparently they began to forget ... And what now? Not stagnant? Rapid development of the economy in general and production in particular? "Progressive" development, renewal of political, social relations? The best education for young people in the world? Is the economy fair, where about 95% of the "good" belongs, somewhere, 5% to the owners, "back-breaking labor, who amassed" this "good"? Is it fair a society where problems between individuals and groups are not resolved by the force of the Law with the assistance of bona fide law enforcement agencies; and the strength (amount) of money? Tension in society, dissatisfaction with the ruling regime are growing, especially among young people! External enemies ... enemies are enemies, but are we not helping "from within" to prepare the external enemies for the second "JUNE 1941"?
    1. zenion
      zenion 23 June 2021 00: 26
      0
      After all, they knew about this, and therefore everything stolen went beyond the cordon. And they put a roof so that it does not drip over them. About the war - this is for small children. Who will slaughter the goose that lays the golden eggs. This is not even a chicken, but a plant that drives gold wherever the American chef points out. And they just pay taxes and everything that is due for the ocean khans. At one time in Russia there were tax collectors, they robbed the people so much that uprisings broke out one after another. That was the uprising in France, so the German army came to the aid of the French bourgeoisie. If something flutters in Russia, then American help will certainly be here, no one will be sorry. They will keep as many alive as Hitler calculated.
  • lopvlad
    lopvlad 22 June 2021 12: 54
    0
    Back in 1989


    Better in 1945, since it was then that the West was already under the leadership of the United States and began to prepare a new one for Russia on June 22. And in general, the West, since the time of Alexander Nevsky, has been constantly preparing for Russia on June 22, only the leaders are changing.



    The reason is simple - the West has overwhelming military and economic superiority over Russia.


    if that were so, no one would have arranged a meeting in Geneva, but would have already bombed the territory of Russia, as Yugoslavia was bombed in due time.
    The West has always been pragmatic and therefore sat down at the negotiating table only with those who were equal to him or had an advantage in the military plan. Those who began to catch up or even surpass him in economic terms, the West always knew how to put pressure, as was the case with Japan in the 80s, and this will be the case with China in the future if it is left alone against the West.
    That is why in Geneva we saw negotiations between Russia and the United States and not negotiations between China and the United States.
  • Per se.
    Per se. 22 June 2021 12: 57
    +3
    A voluminous and rather interesting article. What would I express myself here in response, as my opinion.
    There are many points in the article that you can agree with, but not all.
    Beijing and Moscow are now forced to be friends against the United States.
    Beijing is not friends with anyone, Moscow may be. Actually, Hitler and I were so forced to "make friends", even when German units invaded the territory of the USSR, echelons with our grain were still going to Germany.

    Sergei, China is not an ally for us. Communism is by definition international, and in China there are nationalists who have territorial claims to all neighboring countries, including Russia.

    The wicked irony is that it was only thanks to the Soviet Union and socialism in general that China rose from the mud of a third-rate country. The USSR provided assistance to China for $ 3,4 billion, this does not take into account the cost of technologies donated to China, the remuneration of Soviet specialists in the PRC (this payment was made by the Soviet side) and scholarships for Chinese students who studied in the USSR. Most of the transfers were non-refundable, China returned to us in total, according to experts, only 15% of all loans.

    China was given Port Arthur (with all military equipment) and Dalny with all the infrastructure, emphasizing China's independence and sovereignty. All this is much more than the countries of Europe received from the United States under the Marshall Plan. For example, Great Britain received more than others - it is $ 2,8 billion, while West Germany only 1,3 billion. This is despite the fact that the USSR suffered the most, and was not, like the United States, a country profiting from the war, enslaving the whole world for a dollar.

    How did the Chinese "national communists" repay us? The events on Damanskoye, and this is not a matter of grievances for the debunking of Stalin. The same Khrushchev gave the PRC Port Arthur and Dalny. In addition, the Chinese nationalists also attacked socialist Vietnam.

    There is also no real socialism in China, the whole "Chinese miracle" is the huge profits made by transnational corporations on Chinese counterfeit goods, with cheap labor.
    At the same time, as with Hitler, who was allowed everything, violations of the restrictions of Versailles, with the absorption of Austria, gave Czechoslovakia. Everything, without a boycott, sanctions and intervention.
    For the necessary potential against a socialist and independent USSR, even France, along with most of the countries of Western Europe, was sacrificed. Further, the "strange war" in which Hitler was preparing for his main mission, the "Barbarossa" plan.

    From China, too, like water off a duck's back, with all the theft of technology and terry piracy, threats to Taiwan. This is despite the fact that in China "commies" and "socialism", but "fraternal capitalism" in Russia, with the henpecked Central Bank and dependent oligarch brothers - boycott and sanctions.

    We are forced to fraternize with those whom they began to train as the eastern anti-USSR, and now anti-Russia. The Chinese military will not go on the ocean floor in the United States, next to the rich and empty lands of Russia.
    The West itself can easily destroy China, it is not self-sufficient, it is only allowed to pump up its muscles.
    The United States and Britain will not be at war with Russia. They are not accustomed to raking in heat with someone else's hands, to play off and bribe. There are both "sixes" for biting Russia (the same Bandera and Balts), and a new trump "ace" in the sleeve, this is our "friend" China.

    Besides, is our dependent government itself ready to fight for Russia? It's one thing to puff out cheeks and threaten with a fist, to raise ratings and drank some dough at the sale of the Soviet legacy. Another thing is to really give up everything that has been acquired by "back-breaking labor" and kept in foreign currency and foreign banks, with Russia's enemies. Our newly-born bourgeois, I suppose, would have surrendered to the owners, in the name of peace, humanism and tolerance, and either the stigma in the cannon, or their people would have lifted their Soviet education and science.

    So think at the same time, be a pessimist, saying that there is nowhere worse, or an optimist, assuring that there is still much worse.
    1. Astra wild2
      Astra wild2 22 June 2021 14: 51
      +3
      And according to the author: China, Iran and Russia are already in a military-political alliance
      Iran may well change course. And then what will the author say?
    2. Astra wild2
      Astra wild2 22 June 2021 14: 59
      +1
      "our" friend "China" in Washington will be happy if relations between China and Russia deteriorate.
      China and the United States will not become allies in the near future: The Chinese economy is now the main irritant for the United States: remember the hysteria over Huawei?
      1. Per se.
        Per se. 23 June 2021 06: 35
        0
        Quote: Astra wild2
        The Chinese economy is now the main irritant for the United States
        The Chinese economy has long been hypertrophied, there is a shortage of fresh water in China, fertile soils are poisoned, and natural resources are needed for industry. China needs Russia, also because it is one of the main consumers of Chinese goods, from complex to banal consumer goods, made of pencils and pins. Our government, with its "optimization" of production on the principle of "two eyes is a luxury", reduced "everything and everyone" in its industry. There is no way without China, this is the main "import substitution" for Western sanctions.

        Therefore, you will have to "make friends" with China, but it is stupid and dangerous to see it as an ally. When Russia has its own socialism, only then will we have true independence and real import substitution.
    3. zenion
      zenion 23 June 2021 00: 40
      +1
      Per se. You forgot to say that the trouble with China started because of Stalin. When Mao told Khrushch that he was undermining the international communist parties, Khrushch only laughed. And then he mocked China that China had given the thousandth warning to the United States for flying over Chinese territory. But when the Chinese got better, and they began to shoot down American planes, then Khrushch bit his lip. And with Damansky it also started because of Khrushch. It was already understood that if his personality cult began to go off scale, then it would be better to get rid of it. I was drafted into the Army, and there was nothing to eat. The planes stood without flights, there was no fuel. There was only NZ in reserve in case of war. Only at the end of 1964 did products appear in the army in addition to potatoes and tarpaulin. Were the Chinese to blame too? Of course, the Chinese are to blame for not wanting to live like in the USSR, but they were wrong, but they also corrected. And in the USSR they did not blow either a mustache or a pipe, and everything rolled. Under Stalin there could be artels, but after Stalin they became obscene. And in China, the whole country worked and artels are still working there.
      1. Per se.
        Per se. 23 June 2021 06: 20
        0
        Quote: zenion
        You forgot to say that the trouble with China started because of Stalin.

        If Comrade Mao revered Joseph Vissarionovich so much, then he should have known his statement about the leader and the people (about Germany).
        Hitlers come and go, but the German people, and the German state remains

        What were the Russians and other peoples of the USSR to blame for, who themselves did not fatten after the war, helping China to rise? They needed a reason, the Chinese found it. China received help in industrialization and the creation of an atomic bomb, and then they decided that they themselves with a mustache, apparently, had reason to count on the support of the West in anti-Sovietism.
        The events on Damanskoye happened already without Khrushchev, there was Brezhnev.
  • Vladimir61
    Vladimir61 22 June 2021 13: 06
    +1
    Too many conjectures and frivolous conclusions! For interest, I have read his trilogy "War against the Russian World" and I will say one thing - comrade, listing long-standing and well-known facts to everyone, passes them off as a kind of masterpiece. At the same time, any personal political and even more so ideological platform is completely absent, such a critic of everything and everything that happened in Russia and a public prosecutor of the Putin regime, while unobtrusively admiring the successes of the West. A typical model of imposing an "irritant" on Russian society with a list of historical events and specific thoughts. These conclusions (from the published trilogy) were enough for me to understand where and where the wind is blowing:

    Under Putin, the country has developed and improved the authoritarian-populist model of government, which we can observe in Turkey or Venezuela. Due to patriotic and anti-American rhetoric, the president managed to create for himself the image of a national leader on which almost all of Russia rests, who has stopped its collapse and is waging an incessant struggle against internal and external enemies.


    The same operation (meaning the fate of Hitler and Hussein) in 2014 was carried out against another Western "partner" (who would very much like to become a real ally) - Russian President Vladimir Putin. For most of the Western elites, the events in Crimea were undoubtedly a shock and a surprise. But in the camp of our enemy there were also those who perfectly understood what was happening and organized the course of events in the right way. And such an unexpected courage of the Russian leadership in the issue of the annexation of Crimea, one way or another, was sanctioned by a certain part of the Western "friends" of the Kremlin. After that, having firmly hooked Putin on the Crimean bait, the collective West received an excellent pretext for any "retaliatory" actions against Russia, which allegedly poses a "threat" to world security.

    But all these "Western friends" look rather pale in order to dictate conditions to both Russia and Putin!
  • Micfoster
    Micfoster 22 June 2021 13: 06
    +5
    If Russia is attacked, I will go to war! Not for the oligarchs and not even for the president. And for your land! That my ancestors have always defended. In the last war, seven of my grandfathers remained. At least for the sake of their memory it is worth fighting! They were able to defend their land and we can.
    1. zenion
      zenion 23 June 2021 00: 43
      0
      How many hectares of land are on the farm, this kulak was not considered at that time. Didn't do a DNA test. Probably keep your hirelings, as the kulaks are supposed to do?
  • Palestinian
    Palestinian 22 June 2021 13: 09
    0
    so what is the conclusion ??? .... we are all crazy ... or ... get up and fight? .... I'm over 40 .. served in the army .. higher medical arr.
    ... my 15-year-old son is studying in Suvorov ... how can I push all this to my family
    1. Vladimir61
      Vladimir61 22 June 2021 13: 17
      +2
      Quote: Palestinian
      ... my 15-year-old son is studying in Suvorov ... how can I push all this to my family

      It seems to me that my son did not go to Suvorovskoye for that, so that he needed to be told something else!
    2. Astra wild2
      Astra wild2 22 June 2021 14: 42
      0
      A Palestinian colleague, why should the family need to push something. Are they against the boy to study at Suvorov?
      1. Palestinian
        Palestinian 22 June 2021 14: 54
        0
        well, of course not ... from the age of three my eugene began to sculpt some kind of cannon ... tanks, etc. ... still his favorite film in the war as in the war of 1968 ... then of course I worked with him ... ..
        1. Astra wild2
          Astra wild2 22 June 2021 16: 20
          0
          So everything is fine
  • avib
    avib 22 June 2021 13: 09
    +2
    Everyone in Russia knows that there are Western sanctions. 90% of the Russian population do not know "why".
    Like one fine morning, Obama woke up and decided to impose sanctions on Russia. He just wanted to.

    This is because
    Causes of conflict

    The point, of course, is not Crimea, Ukraine or Russia's "aggressive" actions.


    There is no need to oversimplify and "customize".
  • looker-on
    looker-on 22 June 2021 13: 21
    +3
    Quote: Daniil Konovalenko
    The "spirit" of the article is similar to Samsonov's corporation. Probably a graduate.

    I laugh out loud. There was just no superethnos)
  • JD1979
    JD1979 22 June 2021 13: 25
    +3
    So much has been written and so little meaning ...
    1. As the West sees the role of RFii with its world - a raw material appendage - oil, gas, metal and other resources.
    What is happening in the Russian Federation in recent years (look on the Vremya Vperyod and Sonar 2050 channels) where they have been telling good news for several years about how the industry is reviving in the Russian Federation.
    What MEGA projects are being implemented! The country is rising from its knees))) But there is a nuance!)) (Who remembers the anecdote?) 9 out of 10 Mega-projects .... only provide ... an increase in the export of this very raw material))) and refineries and gas processing plants and NGL and a bunch pipelines in all directions))) And even the giant shipyard Zvezda))) on which what is being built? there is no aviki-cruiser, no dry-cargo vessels-ro-rokers-bulk carriers-container ships for exporting products of their industry with high added value, but ... that's right! Tankers and gas carriers!))) And again, 8 out of 10 vessels whose descent is illuminated on the BB and Sonar channels - these are the same carriers.

    And the point is for the West to destroy a perfectly working system to plunder its colony? The natives do everything themselves under the control of the traitors at the helm. You just need to pour the necessary propaganda from all sources into your ears so that your brains are swollen and cannot think.

    2. Military and all-all-all)))
    The military-industrial complex and the army and the police are essentially parasites, the existence of which must be constantly justified for taxpayers, why they are given so much money for toys and rides and not invested in improving the lives of these very payers. And this is for everyone in the West, in RFii)) We declare each other as enemies and shear sheep))) and to make it easier to cut, we periodically shoot flash mobs near each other's borders under hysteria in the media and formidable statements from talking heads. All the necessary atmosphere is set, money flows like a river, people are built, the military are busy with pokatushki - everyone is busy, everyone is happy))
  • GBG_Belarus
    GBG_Belarus 22 June 2021 13: 40
    +2
    Here it struck the author for treason, it seems that the grass was good))) If Russia, as in the 90s, moved along the collapse of the country and the army, it would have already been attacked. According to their forecasts, which they gave in the early 2000s, by 2018 the degradation of the Russian army and economy would have just reached the state that would have allowed them to strike with impunity, but Volodya very much spoiled their plans. For which he and his company are not very much disliked in the West. Now the Russian army can repel the attack and cause irreparable damage to the collective west, and they know it, so there will be no war with Russia. But China is likely to be bombed, they have no choice and time is running out. By 2030, China will also become too hard a nut to crack militarily and cannot be easily bombed.
    1. zenion
      zenion 23 June 2021 00: 47
      0
      Repel the attack, or join?
  • K-50
    K-50 22 June 2021 13: 52
    -1
    The article is some kind of alarmist, like everything is gone, the client leaves and the plaster cast is removed! fellow lol
    No economy will help the West in the event of an attack on Russia, from the word at all!
    Our nuclear strategic arsenal will reset it, the economy will not help the radioactive ones and coals. request
    Our Doctrine clearly states that we can use nuclear weapons in the event of a threat to the country and territorial integrity! Will there be enough political will? I hope so. It was not for nothing that the Supreme Commander said, "Why do we need such a world if there is no Russia in it?"
    So, let's break through !!! angry
    1. Daniil Konovalenko
      Daniil Konovalenko 22 June 2021 14: 26
      +2
      It was not for nothing that the Supreme Commander said, "Why do we need such a world if there is no Russia in it?"
      The Supreme Commander also said that they would burn, and we would go to heaven. All taken into account, a mighty hurricane.
  • Siegfried
    Siegfried 22 June 2021 13: 55
    +1
    What will the victory over Russia give - economic prosperity? solution to all problems? A war to reduce the world's population? Are they not afraid of Russia's nuclear weapons? Human resources for war? (will this generation of transgender people go to Russia?) ... Europe is Russia's natural ally and will always be, and the Europeans themselves will shut their mouths so quickly to these Washington singers at the periphery that they will even forget the words of their anthem instantly.
    1. zenion
      zenion 23 June 2021 00: 48
      0
      Will be an ally until we run out of gas and oil. Then they will probably shout - give the West coal!
  • isv000
    isv000 22 June 2021 14: 33
    +1
    Quote: prior
    Russia has already prepared a response to the West - on August 6 ...

    But August 6 is also the day of beer! .. drinks
  • Astra wild2
    Astra wild2 22 June 2021 14: 35
    +1
    WWI and WWII cannot be combined too different historical eras.
    The aftermath of WWI was the October Revolution. She changed the world forever
  • andybuts
    andybuts 22 June 2021 14: 46
    +2
    the economic crises of recent years and the depreciation of the ruble, the growing separatism in the national republics, the general impoverishment of the population and the continuing extinction of the Russian people - all these are links in the same chain

    if you look at it from Russia, it is precisely the handiwork of our government. Does this mean that Putin is a henchman of the world behind the scenes? It doesn’t seem like that. Maybe the Russian authorities and Russian big capital simply don't care about the Russian people? Maybe it is more important for them to maintain stability by failing to carry out the necessary reforms in order to stay at the faucet with state resources? In my opinion, this sounds more like the truth than the machinations of the West.

    An excellent example is Germany, which after the world massacre of 1914-1945 was literally spiritually "castrated". If in the days of the Kaiser and the Fuhrer German men were considered worthy opponents and managed to bring almost the whole of Europe to their knees, now they dream of ... the life of a housewife and tremble like a leaf in front of crowds of migrants raping their women, calling the police for help with frightened faces.

    was the author in Germany? when I was there, there are not so many migrants to say that "there are crowds in the streets" (especially, given the fact that there are many Turks living there since the 70s for several generations), about the violence of women by migrants on the street - this is just a cliche, is the number of rapes in Germany strong in statistics than in Russia?
    Well, to call the police in case of violation of law and order is normal, not to engage in lynching.

    At the behest of their overseas masters, the liberal media are trying to impose on the Russian world respect for "gay European values" and reverence for traitors like Vlasov, Solzhenitsyn or Yeltsin. Slowly but surely, liberals populate Russia with Caucasian and Asian migrants, organize a social genocide of the Russian population (especially in the outback), stifle the economy and rigidly block any development of the country.

    Yeltsin is revered by the authorities themselves, the Yeltsin Center exists within the framework of the law on former presidents and on the money of taxpayers from Russia. At the cinema with reverence for the Nazis and the Wehrmacht, about the fact that friendship is more important than betrayal, etc. are allocated from the state fund of the State Film Agency, even if films are made by "liberal directors". Kiselev spoke about the monument to the Nazi criminal Krasnov on the state television channel, who also cannot be accused of pursuing pro-Western interests. A memorial plaque about Mannerheim in St. Petersburg was hung with the permission of the authorities of St. Petersburg. Migrants, on the other hand, are brought in not by liberals, but by quite "responsible Russian" businesses in order to reduce their payroll costs.

    And such a distortion is complete in the article.
    1. zenion
      zenion 23 June 2021 00: 56
      0
      Remember the words of Ivan the Baptist and you will recognize him not by his words but by his deeds. It was said that Hitler was a very pleasant person to be around. He loved children and dogs. What beautiful words he spoke. But his business was such that if he were alive, he would have been hanged, no matter what he blurted out. Goering, when he found out that he was being executed, told the guard that Hitler had always feared that the United States would deceive him, turned out to be true. After that, he took poison, which the dove probably brought him to the cell. Kozma Prutkov wrote - If you read the inscription "buffalo" on an elephant's cage, do not believe your eyes. A henchman, or not a henchman, what do you think about his deeds?
      1. andybuts
        andybuts 23 June 2021 11: 45
        0
        of course, a protege, only not of the West, but of the local oligarchy and big business
  • tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 22 June 2021 14: 47
    -3
    The commander of the AUG, Lizka, announced constant control by the Russians, in addition to the presence of the Russian Navy forces, Russian aviation is flying overflights. The brothers are working so that there is no repetition on June 22, 1941.
  • isv000
    isv000 22 June 2021 14: 54
    0
    Superiority in human resources is also on the side of the enemy. According to recent data, there are at least 3,5 million troops in NATO armies versus about 0,9 million Russian.

    The Soviet Union, at the height of the war, had an army of 9 million fired upon soldiers and officers. This is with a population of 197 million. In modern Russia, 85 constituent entities, in each regional center the foe will have to keep a division, regional centers - at least a regiment, and we have 1868 regional centers ... Plus regular and auxiliary units. Where did the firewood come from, that is, to recruit so many people for them? Negroes with Latinos on the snowy expanses will not last long, and the Yankees did not go far. And, like the cherry on the cake, no matter what NATO warrior may be, but in Russia he is an invader and, therefore, he will walk with an eye, otherwise the snow will fall into his head - he will be completely dead ... soldier
  • Astra wild2
    Astra wild2 22 June 2021 15: 10
    0
    Quote: Igoresha
    well, we need to rally around the leader and not whine

    I DO NOT SEE SUCH A LEADER: Zyuganov, who betrayed all the ideas of V. I., Lenin? "Collapsed" Putin? Zakhar Prilepin? Ksenia Sobchak? Furgalov or Gudkov with Navalny?
    1. zenion
      zenion 23 June 2021 01: 00
      0
      So neither Lenin nor Stalin inherited the country. They raised the country and united the scattered parts. And the leader says that Lenin planted a bomb under the USSR. Borka the drunkard has ruined the whole country, let everyone have enough as much as they can, - allowed Boris, who is not right, but Lenin is to blame. At the same time, Borya reported to the US regional committee - the job was done.
      1. Astra wild2
        Astra wild2 23 June 2021 19: 04
        0
        For me the leader is V.I. Lenin, and V.I. In no way does it strive for the construction of socialism
  • smaug78
    smaug78 22 June 2021 15: 40
    +1
    Yeah, where does TopWar find obsessions in marketable quantities? laughing
  • nikvic46
    nikvic46 22 June 2021 16: 14
    +2
    As there was a threat, it remains. If I say that all our relations depend only on us, I will be dismissed as an annoying fly. But this is actually the case. You can make a lot of noise, but there will be no reaction to this noise. . It is necessary to make an intonation for illegal actions. There are many levers, both political and economic. A harsh word spoken in time is much more valuable than just exclamations. Everything depends on us. Here are some shouting, they say, China is robbing us. It takes out timber and all that. Remember, without our permission, a nail will not be driven in our territory. If anything is done, everything is with our permission.
    1. ammunition
      ammunition 23 June 2021 00: 48
      0
      Quote: nikvic46
      Here are some shouting, they say, China is robbing us. It takes out timber and all that. Remember, without our permission, a nail will not be driven in our territory.

      That's right.
  • Esaul
    Esaul 22 June 2021 16: 18
    0
    The author, of course, went too far with chernukha, conspiracies and did not take into account nuclear weapons
    1. ammunition
      ammunition 23 June 2021 00: 46
      0
      Quote: Esaul
      The author did not take into account nuclear weapons

      I took it into account.
    2. zenion
      zenion 23 June 2021 01: 04
      0
      Better to overbid than to overbid later! There was one such guy named Mikhail, so he always had the right words like - don't bzdi, let's kick it together. If the blood is brown, then I am injured. etc.
  • 89670719026
    89670719026 22 June 2021 16: 32
    -2
    Normal analysis at the level of the regiment commander.
  • globe
    globe 22 June 2021 17: 01
    -1
    But why should well-fed men rush into the trenches?
    Does anyone now believe that a well-fed Swede or Austrian will drop everything and go into the trenches?
    1. ammunition
      ammunition 23 June 2021 00: 44
      0
      Quote: Globe
      Does anyone now believe that a well-fed Swede or Austrian will drop everything and go into the trenches?

      -))))))) Even the brave Schweik went. What is Schweik! Even the well-fed and fat-bellied Baloun went .-))
      1. globe
        globe 23 June 2021 05: 56
        -1
        I mean that the well-fed will not sit in the trenches. Never.
        And Russia is already selling resources to the West at a low price.
  • lis-ik
    lis-ik 22 June 2021 17: 23
    -4
    Fabulous nonsense. Why should they fight the Russian Federation? Our "elites" and so give everything with giblets, and the territory with the population of nafig is not needed to feed it and extinguish partisan wars.
  • parusnik
    parusnik 22 June 2021 17: 25
    +2
    When the internal state of the state is not stable politically and economically, the people are prepared for war.
    1. zenion
      zenion 23 June 2021 01: 12
      +1
      If there is no idea for what the people live, then you have to prepare for war. There is such an anecdote, a little Caucasian. In general, Vano is accepted into the party, everything answered and decided to ask him a couple of additional questions. Listen katso, if the party says quit smoking, will you? Of course I will. If the party says don't drink wine, won't you? Of course I won't. If the party says don't sleep with a woman, what will you do? I will not sleep with a woman. Listen, Vano, if the party says give your life for the party, will you? Of course I’ll give it to you, what the hell is my life! The people do not raise that the Russians should catch up and overtake America in terms of the number of billionaires and millionaires in numbers and fortunes, this is why the people live and of course give their lives, this is the real idea that was presented to the Russians.
  • Ros 56
    Ros 56 22 June 2021 18: 53
    -2
    The reason is simple - the West has overwhelming military and economic superiority over Russia.

    And Satan and Poseidon don't give a fuck.
    There will be no striped ones, there will be no quarrels, and the Geyropeans are now in circulation.
  • Osipov9391
    Osipov9391 22 June 2021 19: 05
    +1
    The deployment by the United States of medium-range missiles in Poland and Romania at ABM bases is very dangerous. In fact (SM-3 of the latest modifications) they are already deployed there. It costs nothing to convert them into offensive weapons.
    And this is very dangerous. The entire European part of Russia will be at gunpoint. Missiles from Poland and Romania will reach our most important targets in 5-8 minutes in total.
    You have to do something about this.
  • crossbow
    crossbow 22 June 2021 20: 19
    -1
    Nonsense((
  • 123456789
    123456789 22 June 2021 20: 55
    -1

    Putin: "If a fight is inevitable, you must hit first"
    1. zenion
      zenion 23 June 2021 01: 22
      -1
      It reminded me of an Odessa anecdote. Syoma is coming, and I'll meet Monya for him. Syoma, is it true that yesterday at Deribasovskaya street you met with Aronchik and he kicked you in the face, but you didn’t react? Monya is offended, as it is, as I did not react, I fell. Monya goes and again Aronchik meets him. And then Syoma tells that Wolf Mesing spoke and took Gersh by the hand and led him through the hall and told where he was on business trips, how many mistresses he had on business trips and how many children. You can't imagine how ashamed he was in front of his fourth wife. And it's all? Compared to what I've seen, this is nonsense. Aronchik and Monya met on crutches. Aronchik looked attentively at Monya, he did not take him through the streets of Odessa, but looked so closely into Monya's eyes and said - Monya, throw your crutches and Monya threw. And what stood without crutches? Crashed to hell.