Theory, practice and perspectives. American submersible aircraft projects

22

One of the variants of the submarine plane from NSWC Carderock

For many decades, various projects and concepts of submersible aircraft have regularly appeared - devices capable of alternately performing aerodynamic flight and scuba diving. Due to objective limitations and difficulties, not a single project of this kind has reached practical application. However, research in this area continues, and the leading role in them remains with the United States. Their naval forces show a great interest in equipment of an unusual class.

Objective difficulties


Any submersible aircraft project faces a number of objective difficulties. The combination of two fundamentally different functions always complicates the design, up to the loss of the ability to one of them. Similar complications are seen in the context of a glider, propulsion system, cargo hold, etc.



At the end of the XNUMXs, the Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division from the US Navy conducted another research work on the topic of submarine aircraft. It formed the exact range of tasks and problems typical for such projects, and also proposed options for their solution based on current technologies. It is important that at the final stage of this research and development such proposals were confirmed by tests of scale models.


The layout of the device from NSWC Carderock

A submersible aircraft needs a lightweight and durable glider that can fly in the air and withstand water pressure at operating depths. In addition, it must provide all the necessary devices and compartments. So, an aircraft needs voluminous fuel tanks, and a submarine needs ballast tanks.

Powerplant design is a major challenge. Covert diving and flying in the air are fundamentally different processes for different propulsion systems. As a result, the device must have two separate motors or some kind of combined system.

Known difficulties are to be expected in the formation of a complex of onboard equipment. A submarine plane needs special means of navigation and communication that can operate alternately in different conditions. This factor must also be taken into account when forming a complex of weapons, cargo compartments, etc.

Hydrofoil


The most interesting and well-developed among modern projects is the concept formed in 2010 by the American center NSWC within the framework of the mentioned research. The purpose of this work was to determine the possibility of creating a submersible aircraft capable of taking off from an offshore platform, flying 400 miles through the air and passing 12 nautical miles under water, and then disembarking combat swimmers. Then it was required to make the way back to the platform. The duration of stay under water was set at the level of 3 days.


The scale model takes off from the water. Photo from NSWC Carderock report

The "flying wing" layout with a large protruding fuselage, swept leading edge and engines on the upper and lower surfaces was considered optimal. The wing was given for tanks and cisterns for various purposes. The power plant included a pair of turbofan engines for flight and a rudder with an electric motor for sailing. Inside the fuselage and wing, it was possible to place a cockpit for two crew members and a separate compartment for six paratroopers. A special ski chassis was offered for takeoff and landing.

NSWC Carderock has worked on two versions of the submarine aircraft. The larger one had a wingspan of approx. 33 m with a length of approx. 10 m. Its calculated mass reached 17,7 tons. Cruising speed was determined at 200 miles per hour in the air and 6 knots under water; other parameters should have been consistent with the original assignment.

Several prototypes were built in accordance with these ideas. With their help, they worked out flight in the air and takeoff and landing modes. The specifics of diving and working at shallow depths were also investigated. The greatest difficulties, for obvious reasons, were caused by the issues of transition from one environment to another. Nevertheless, it was possible to find the best options for components and assemblies, as well as to form the most convenient methods for performing various processes.


Flimmer in flight. Photo by NRL

Based on the results of this research work, NSWC Carderock stated the fundamental possibility of creating a cargo-passenger submersible aircraft based on available technologies. However, as far as is known, this research work has not received development, and the proposed look was not used in real projects. However, rumors are circulating abroad about the possible launch of experimental design work, which so far remains secret.

Sea glider


In the mid-XNUMXs, the Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) demonstrated new versions of submarine aircraft, adapted to specific tasks. Such products were proposed to be used to strengthen anti-submarine defense.

First came the Flimmer (formed from Flyer and Swimmer) from NLR. It was a tailless apparatus with a developed spindle-shaped fuselage and a strong swept wing with keels on the tips. In the tail was a pusher propeller. Later, the Flying Sea Glider appeared with a normal aerodynamic design with a straight wing and a full tail. This device was intended for gliding flight and did not have an engine.

The Flimmer / Flying Sea Glider concept involved the use of drone- submarines as anti-submarine weapons. Such a product should be dropped by the carrier and fly over the sea, searching for an underwater target. Having found it, the UAV should splash down and go under water. Then he aims at the enemy submarine and hits it with his warhead. The first version of the Flimmer was capable of independent flight and swimming. Flying Sea Glider was supposed to work on the principle of an underwater glider and move under water only due to the accumulated energy.


An early version of the Flying Sea Glider. Photo US Government Executive

In 2015-18. two variants of submarine drones have been tested and confirmed their ability to solve the assigned tasks. It should be noted that the proposed concept of anti-submarine UAV has greatly simplified the development of the project. Two products from ONR and NRL are required to fly "one way". Getting out of the water and taking off are not provided.

Simplification course


In 2018, specialists from the University of North Carolina published information on their research and development on the topic of the unmanned submarine, commissioned by DARPA. The apparatus of the aircraft design, "inspired by seabirds", passed the necessary tests and successfully demonstrated the ability to work in two environments and the transition between them.

This device was built according to the normal aerodynamic design with a straight wing span of 1,42 m. The length of the product is 1,32 m. An electric motor with a propeller was placed in the nose of the spindle-shaped fuselage for flight. The central volume was given for batteries and controls. In the tail of the fuselage, in front of the tubular beam, there was a motor for movement under water. Using a long shaft, he rotated the propeller mounted inside the tail unit.

Landing on water was carried out with a high angle of attack to reduce the force of impact. After that, using the standard steering surfaces, the UAV could submerge. The takeoff procedure began at a certain depth. The device took up a vertical position and began to ascend due to the propeller motor. Raising its nose above the surface, the drone turned on the flight engine.

Theory, practice and perspectives. American submersible aircraft projects
A seabird-inspired UAV takes off from the water. Photo of the University of North Carolina

In the project of the University of North Carolina and DARPA, a fairly simple scheme of a submarine aircraft was implemented, showing the necessary capabilities. However, nothing is known about the development of these ideas. Probably, such an architecture can only show high performance on a small scale. The creation of a full-size aircraft of this kind will be extremely difficult and unlikely to provide all the desired capabilities.

Unclear future


Thus, the Pentagon and its various structures do not lose interest in submersible aircraft and from time to time launch the development of new samples of this kind. However, the results of these programs are still rather modest. Several concepts of such an aircraft with various features and advantages have been developed and tested in practice, but things are not going further. None of the research projects have evolved into a full-fledged project with a reserve for future practical application.

The main reason for this can be considered a specific ratio of costs and potential benefits. The full-scale development of submarine aircraft, despite the fundamental possibility, is still considered inexpedient. At the same time, they pay enough attention to research in this area and the search for promising solutions. In addition, the possible place of unusual designs in the Air Force or Navy remains uncertain. Their advantages over other means and systems of a traditional look are also questionable.

Thus, both in the past and now, the main result of all new projects in the field of submersible aircraft is scientific, design and practical experience. Whether it will be used in real projects depends on the potential customer. So far, with all the interest in promising technologies, the US Navy and Air Force prefer to do with traditional solutions.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    26 June 2021 05: 08
    Gospidya! Lived! Holy, holy, holy! No end of the World is coming soon! am As soon as validol was enough to recover from "diving ships and semi-submersible platform ships", as another attack: "submersible planes" belay ! Guard! Save! Save us from "innovations"! fool
    1. +8
      26 June 2021 06: 39
      No end of the World is coming soon!
      Truly I say to you: the earth will hit the heavenly axis!
      And the project is very curious, we live in an interesting time ..
      1. +3
        26 June 2021 09: 48
        we live in an interesting time

        Have you stayed in the 30-40s of the last century?
        https://www.maximonline.ru/longreads/_article/20-000-le-nad-vodoi-istoriya-letayushei-podvodnoi-lodki/
    2. +4
      26 June 2021 06: 48
      PS Why "submersible planes"? Because it was invented by the Author and he wanted it so? As I already said: "I don't want a helicopter! I want a screwdriver!"? There are already well-established terms, names, designations! The name "flying submarine" (submarine) "... or" plane-submarine "has long been used ... What other x-vegetable is needed? submarines "(LPL) ... (submarine aircraft (SPL) have been known since the first half of the last century! Wishlist, dreams, as always, there were many ... no less hopes! But ..." dreams, dreams. .. where is your sweetness? "... Once upon a time we dreamed of" universal "artillery," shooters ", airplanes and many other universal" vesches "! In a number of cases, these" vesches "took place (!). ..released and applied! But they did not even supplant and, moreover, did not supplant the "specialized" in each case "veschi"! The fact that there are "universal" vesches is nothing surprising ... as you know, most of the rules have exceptions ! But the exceptions are that they are not often met and in a small number! For at the present time "universalism" is not reliable enough and expensive ... and, perhaps, very expensive ... and far from e is always constantly (!) necessary! I do not exclude the possibility that after some time technical production will become so technologically advanced that it will be possible to have universal inexpensive "vesches"! But even then the question remains: Is it always necessary?
    3. +2
      26 June 2021 11: 15
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      How to attack again: "submersible planes"
      What's the next one? Any plane can submerge, for this you should not strain too much. But to surface and take off later is a problem! The problem of drug addiction among those who order such works.
  2. +3
    26 June 2021 05: 21
    Two-medium combat aircraft can be seen in the movie "Sky Captain and the World of the Future";)
  3. +3
    26 June 2021 05: 54
    It's a funny idea, I remember drawing such things in my childhood fantasies.
    And so, if you think of why, then you can do it. For example, an anti-submarine drone can be quite useful to itself.
  4. +5
    26 June 2021 07: 56
    Boris Ushakov's project, early 30s (!) Years:
    3-screw aircraft with a cockpit with a periscope.
    The devices were housed in sealed capsules that protected them from the effects of water. The aircraft body was supposed to be made of duralumin, the wings - of steel. Tanks with fuel and oil liquids were made of rubber to exclude the possibility of damage and fuel leakage.
    Six compartments - the first three for aircraft engines; one living compartment for three people; a compartment with a propeller electric motor and a room with a battery installation.
    The splashdown and full immersion took only 1,5 minutes. Maximum immersion depth - 45 m, autonomy - 48 hours.
    Flight speed-185 km / h:
    maximum height - 2,5 km :,
    flight range - 800 km,
    For that time, excellent parameters.
    But the speed under water - up to -3 knots, which was not in favor of research. Plus lack of funding
    The project was closed in 1937, or rather frozen. Only papers remained.
  5. +1
    26 June 2021 12: 05
    Quote: Jacket in stock
    It's a funny idea, I remember drawing such things in my childhood fantasies.
    And so, if you think of why, then you can do it. For example, an anti-submarine drone can be quite useful to itself.

    Yes, in my childhood (more likely in my early youth, a Bauman student then) I also drew such a thing, already with approximate drawings, for immersion / ascent and to ensure take-off / run I came up with a clever version of an air cushion.
    And my wings were small folded, although in fact it was all the same flying wing! wink
  6. +5
    26 June 2021 12: 51
    It is enough to create a shock-reconnaissance drone hydro-plane,
    launched from a regular transport.
    To be able to land on the water, "rest" before approaching
    targets - enemy ships, and attack them when they come closer.
    Why rush at the enemy - they will come themselves. wink
    This will prevent the transporter from getting close to the enemy.
    1. +2
      26 June 2021 15: 17
      Yes, the meaning of such studies is not entirely clear. Why would you need a two-medium aircraft? At least theoretically?
      For example, I can understand the meaning of your drone this way - this is a cheap and safe way of throwing torpedoes or hydroacoustic buoys into the potential path of enemy ships, ships or submarines. In this case, it may even be a response to the appearance of anti-aircraft missiles at submarines, which is already taking place now.
    2. 0
      26 June 2021 15: 33
      It seems to me simpler and more effective than a semi-submersible canister with a rocket (or several canisters), which were thrown away, they then hid a command from the control module and a surprise to the foe.
    3. 0
      26 June 2021 15: 40
      Quote: voyaka uh
      It is enough to create a shock-reconnaissance drone hydro-plane,
      launched from a regular transport.
      To be able to land on the water, "rest" before approaching
      targets - enemy ships, and attack them when they come closer.
      Why rush at the enemy - they will come themselves. wink
      This will prevent the transporter from getting close to the enemy.


      NATO has a different concept, from whom did they defend themselves? they just attack all the time.

      A manned aircraft - a submarine requires a lot of life support equipment. If it's a drone, then things don't get so fantastic.

      The application can be the delivery of drones to an object of interest, which can be a coastline of a state, a port, a military base, etc. not long before the hour x. The drones take the right positions, at the hour x all this takes off and strikes at the right targets.

      All the same can be implemented with existing means, such as a cruise missile strike.

      What is the difference :
      - the flight time has been reduced.
      - there is no mass launch of the RC that can be detected, many aircraft take off, but over a large area and the flight altitude can be extremely low.
      - there is a massive blow from the UAV, but it is difficult to respond to the carrier because it has already sailed away.

      Unusual in any case, but sometimes new approaches come to life.

      With the development of the UAV, this option is becoming more and more realistic.
    4. 0
      26 June 2021 21: 32
      Quote: voyaka uh
      It is enough to create a shock-reconnaissance drone hydro-plane,
      .
      Then he can immediately develop missile-torpedo-mine -
      It should work like this ...
      1) a "rocket" is launched from a ship or plane (or from the ground)
      2) the "rocket" arrives at a given area and splashes down
      3) having splashed down, plunges to depth and continues to move into the next square, having reached which, anchors
      4) an enemy ship enters a given square ... the "rocket" detects and recognizes the "priority target" by sensors in the event of several ships passing
      5) the "missile" attacks the "priority target" in the underwater part.
      The meaning of all "rocket movements" in bypassing enemy air defenses and attacking the weak point of the ship below the waterline.
      The proposal as a whole about the "scheme of action" itself - stealthily approaching an enemy ship -
      By air - for speed and range of launch
      Underwater - for stealthy approach
      Waiting underwater - to lull the enemy's vigilance in an area where the enemy feels "at home".
  7. Cat
    +2
    26 June 2021 13: 52
    In general, an interesting approach: first come up with a kind of hermaphrodite, and then look for suitable tactical tasks for him. Which can be completely solved easier both technically and organizationally.
    The same 800-mile flight and swimmer could be accomplished by ancient Catalina, delivering both swimmers and underwater transporters to travel 12 miles underwater.
    1. +1
      26 June 2021 15: 18
      What is the question. This means that there is something in the picture that we do not know, some tasks. Otherwise, why are they so obstinate in this direction?
      1. +1
        26 June 2021 18: 51
        Quote: Bogatyrev
        What is the question. This means that there is something in the picture that we do not know, some tasks. Otherwise, why are they so obstinate in this direction?


        In science, at the beginning, there was development in certain areas of mathematics, physics, chemistry. Then the rapid development slowed down. But scientists and entire institutes appeared who began to work at the intersection of science and this gave breakthrough discoveries.

        Nowadays there are excellent examples of the same technique that works in the same environment.
        But the military has always wanted apparatus for two environments. An airplane that can float under water and a submarine that can fly.

        The Americans are not developing any one specific device, but simply working on a breakthrough in two-medium devices, working out various options with different applications.

        Why did they do it now, because now it has become real, but earlier it was not possible because of the enormous complexity.
        The construction with a sealed habitable compartment with life support systems, oxygen supply is very heavy, cumbersome and expensive.
        It was possible to make all this fly, but it was low, low, expensive and it was not clear why.

        If the device is an uav, then everything is much simpler.
        In principle, there are already UAVs that are launched from a submerged position, but surfacing in a container to provide communications and reconnaissance. Those. real tasks for such two-average devices already exist.
        1. +2
          26 June 2021 21: 43
          "But scientists and entire institutes appeared who began to work at the intersection of science and this gave breakthrough discoveries" ///
          ----
          It's right.
          There is a demand for physical chemists and chemical physicists (different professions, oddly enough).
          And various electro-chemical-physicists.
          This is where nano-technology leapt forward. And away we go ...
          Substances unthinkable from the point of view of classical chemistry with
          view of classical physics properties. Where the dielectric was supposed - it turned out
          conductor of current, where they thought that the current would flow - fig-two. laughing etc.
        2. Cat
          0
          27 June 2021 07: 49
          Those. real tasks for such two-average devices already exist

          Of course have. Formally, two-medium can be considered PLURO, missiles launched from torpedo tubes and submarine mines, and even hydroacoustic buoys.
    2. 0
      26 June 2021 21: 45
      Quote: Gato

      The same 800-mile flight and swimmer could be accomplished by ancient Catalina, delivering both swimmers and underwater transporters to travel 12 miles underwater.
      And what about the air defense of the "enemy" - the radars see further 12 miles
      In principle, swimmers and equipment can be dropped from a parachute ...
      The only question is how the swimmers get back, "Catalina" splashed down near the "object" and waiting for something on the water will cause suspicion.
  8. 0
    26 June 2021 21: 02
    Kirill Ryabov
  9. +1
    26 June 2021 21: 44
    Well, in general, there were quite working samples. The same "Trifibia" was even a jet version. Another question is that there is no sense in such devices a little more than completely. The underwater launch of an aircraft has long been worked out (the same CR), but to create a car capable of full-fledged movement in two environments is certainly technically possible, but extremely unprofitable - there are painfully different parameters of the environment.