Military Review

Unmanned US Navy vessel autonomously traveled more than eight thousand kilometers

67

As part of the final stage of the Pentagon's test program "Lord of the Ghost fleet»The unmanned surface ship of the US Navy Nomad autonomously traveled more than eight thousand kilometers. His route ran from the Gulf of Mexico through the Panama Canal to the west coast of the United States.


This was reported by the press service of the US Navy.

True, on two percent of the route, which fell on the passage of the Panama Canal, the boat was still driven by a man.

The Ghost Fleet Master project at the US Department of Defense was launched in 2017. Its ultimate goal is to create large and medium-sized unmanned surface-to-water robotic systems capable of operating without human intervention and requiring no maintenance for a long time. Such unmanned high-speed vessels would follow the combat squadron as floating ammunition depots.

To date, two unmanned vessels have been created - Nomad and Ranger. Last year, the Ranger was tested, which also successfully covered the distance from the Gulf of Mexico to the western part of the American coast.

After 2022, it is planned to transfer two surface drones fleet for further testing.
Photos used:
The US Department of Defense
67 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. tarakan
    tarakan 13 June 2021 18: 06
    +10
    Left to check in the waters of Somalia laughing
    1. mitroha
      mitroha 13 June 2021 19: 15
      +8
      Well, the "Flying Dutchman", they say, is still surfing the oceans in full autonomy. So it doesn't fit wassat
    2. smart ass
      smart ass 13 June 2021 20: 46
      -3
      Our device can also travel 10 thousand km, the current carries another 10 kilotons of gifts
      1. alekseykabanets
        alekseykabanets 13 June 2021 21: 01
        +3
        Quote: Clever man
        Our device can also travel 10 thousand km, the current carries another 10 kilotons of gifts

        Something I missed this info. Do not share a link?
        1. aries2200
          aries2200 13 June 2021 22: 22
          -9
          Poseidon is a fully robotic and fast nuclear powered deep-sea vehicle. Has virtually unlimited travel range. It goes under water at a depth of more than 1000 meters at a speed of up to 200 km / h ... Equipped with a 100-megaton nuclear warhead with cobalt.
          1. alekseykabanets
            alekseykabanets 13 June 2021 22: 36
            +4
            Quote: aries2200
            Poseidon is a fully robotic and fast nuclear powered deep-sea vehicle. Has virtually unlimited travel range. It goes under water at a depth of more than 1000 meters at a speed of up to 200 km / h ... Equipped with a 100-megaton nuclear warhead with cobalt.

            This is me with understanding.))) I just missed the information where Poseidon passed 10 thousand km., As Clever (Vasya) writes, at a depth
            Quote: aries2200
            more than 1000 meters at a speed of up to 200 km / h ... Equipped with a 100-megaton nuclear warhead with cobalt.

            How do you write. Is there a link to its successful tests?
            1. poquello
              poquello 14 June 2021 00: 28
              -5
              Quote: aleksejkabanets
              Is there a link to its successful tests?

              )
              https://www.ctbto.org/the-treaty/country-profiles/?country=143&cHash=261836126dea6488d9bc8f4047e8b657
              1. kig
                kig 14 June 2021 04: 10
                +3
                Quote: poquello
                https://www.ctbto.org

                and where to look there?

                Tell us more, very interesting.
                1. poquello
                  poquello 14 June 2021 11: 54
                  0
                  Quote: kig
                  Quote: poquello
                  https://www.ctbto.org

                  and where to look there?

                  Tell us more, very interesting.

                  Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO)
                  Russian Federation Ratification Date 30-JUN-2000
              2. alekseykabanets
                alekseykabanets 14 June 2021 08: 37
                -1
                Quote: poquello
                https://www.ctbto.org/the-treaty/country-profiles/?country=143&cHash=261836126dea6488d9bc8f4047e8b657

                I join the question kig (Igor)
                Quote: kig
                and where to look there?

                If you post a link to successful tests, then post it normally, respect the members of the forum. If there are no links, then keep quiet.
                1. poquello
                  poquello 14 June 2021 12: 03
                  +1
                  Quote: aleksejkabanets
                  If you post a link to successful tests

                  ))))))))))))))))))))))))) !!!!! it's too early to test, the enemies are not that bad
            2. aries2200
              aries2200 14 June 2021 01: 48
              +2
              only on this site 500 articles https://topwar.ru/184003-v-ukrainskih-media-vsu-zamenili-pochti-vse-svoi-svd-novym-snajperskim-oruzhiem.html
              1. alekseykabanets
                alekseykabanets 14 June 2021 08: 26
                -2
                Quote: aries2200
                only on this site 500 articles https://topwar.ru/184003-v-ukrainskih-media-vsu-zamenili-pochti-vse-svoi-svd-novym-snajperskim-oruzhiem.html

                Replacing the SVD in the Armed Forces of Ukraine and here? What are the 500 articles about what? About Poseidon being developed? I ask again, a link to the successful tests of Poseidon, where he covered 10 thousand km. is there or not?
                1. Narak-zempo
                  Narak-zempo 14 June 2021 09: 01
                  -2
                  Quote: aleksejkabanets
                  I ask again

                  How boring you are, really.
                  1. alekseykabanets
                    alekseykabanets 14 June 2021 09: 30
                    -2
                    Quote: Narak-zempo
                    Quote: aleksejkabanets
                    I ask again

                    How boring you are, really.

                    So you have to answer for your words. Not? Do you think differently? If you have a link, there is no link - keep silent.
  2. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 13 June 2021 18: 07
    +2
    Is this a "little" 8000 km and without refueling? Passed and passed. We are waiting for reports on our ships. We need to look for information about Mikhail Ulyanov, after all, a tanker with a hundred thousand, and the road is mostly in ice.
    1. skipper83
      skipper83 14 June 2021 08: 07
      +1
      At your suggestion, I looked for information on Ulyanov, all the same he works in the same company. The meaning is, as I understood, that they put sensors on the bridge that evaluate information on decision-making by navigators in case of divergence of ships. That is, this is only the first step to create an artificial intelligence matrix. He has not yet talked about creating a full-fledged drone based on Ulyanov.
  3. tlauicol
    tlauicol 13 June 2021 18: 07
    +1
    Cape Horn bypassed the drone?
    1. military_cat
      military_cat 13 June 2021 18: 13
      +3
      It does not need to be bypassed if you go through the Panama Canal.
      1. DymOk_v_dYmke
        DymOk_v_dYmke 13 June 2021 19: 02
        -9
        Quote: military_cat
        It does not need to be bypassed if you go through the Panama Canal.

        Where not to go, what is the great point in such drones / unmanned vehicles?
        Some kind of crap.
        1. skipper83
          skipper83 14 June 2021 08: 08
          0
          Savings on crews. The human resource is dear now. A trained crew is even more expensive.
          1. tralflot1832
            tralflot1832 14 June 2021 08: 29
            0
            And the Germans fought off the toilet on the bridge, in a glass cabin with one-sided transparency, the union with the ship owners was a noble srach!
      2. tlauicol
        tlauicol 13 June 2021 19: 21
        +1
        Quote: military_cat
        It does not need to be bypassed if you go through the Panama Canal.

        For the drone to go through the canal locks ... even more loopy. This is not an ordinary case.
        1. kig
          kig 14 June 2021 04: 03
          +1
          Probably it just hit the 2% when he walked with the crew.
  4. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 13 June 2021 18: 29
    +2
    Unmanned vessels are small vessels that do not fall under the IMO convention, large-capacity vessels that fall under the IMO convention are called "autonomous maritime vessels." So you decide what class this laiba belongs to. At the moment, the automation on our ships collects information, analyzes it and makes a decision .But does not have access to engines and steering devices. Everything is controlled by the crews. Faced with the problem of satellite communications, not high bandwidth and stability. Experimental operation will be until 2025, and then there will be a solution. If everything is successful, they will cut sailors' legs on cabotage.
  5. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 13 June 2021 18: 33
    0
    Interestingly, and in a storm who will control the ship?
    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 13 June 2021 18: 44
      +1
      Duc remotely, and not a word about it, the drone has this option.
      1. kig
        kig 14 June 2021 16: 14
        +1
        Here's what they write about this flight:

        Remote mission command and control for the Nomad transit was conducted from an ashore Unmanned Operations Center operated by US Navy Sailors from Surface Development Squadron One

        and more

        with human hands only taking charge when they were passing through the Panama Canal and pulling into port,

        That is, it is not an automatic ship that takes care of itself. This is a remotely controlled vehicle. People on board were only for entering / leaving the port and passing the Panama Canal.

        But it's still great.
    2. mitroha
      mitroha 13 June 2021 19: 16
      +2
      Quote: Alexander 3
      Interestingly, and in a storm who will control the ship?

      Storm laughing
  6. Ryaruav
    Ryaruav 13 June 2021 18: 34
    -2
    but the Malacca or Danish straits are weak?
  7. petrol cutter
    petrol cutter 13 June 2021 18: 48
    +1
    Why does an unmanned ship / vessel need a wheelhouse? With a bunch of windows ...
    Who will look in them? ...
    I understand that the ship is promising / experimental.
    I have already stated my thoughts on the lack of crew.
    1. Thrifty
      Thrifty 13 June 2021 18: 50
      0
      Fuel tanker - little green men will rest there from flights lol
      1. petrol cutter
        petrol cutter 13 June 2021 20: 07
        0
        In undercarriage / GKP? Interesting idea.
        Why such difficulties? ...
    2. Rusticolus
      Rusticolus 13 June 2021 21: 09
      -1
      It is written - unmanned. There is no question of a crewless one. Can you see the air wing? Me neither. F1 cars did not notice the same. The pilot, apparently by tradition, the same was not allowed. So unmanned. laughing
    3. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 13 June 2021 22: 00
      +3
      "Why does an unmanned ship / vessel need a wheelhouse" ///
      ----
      This is a prototype. In serial there will be no felling.
      1. Coward
        Coward 14 June 2021 02: 08
        +1
        Will be. No one in their right mind will allow automatic docking in any port. Too much traffic and a very strong lack of trust in automation. Plus, who will organize the automatic traffic control and mooring stations for ships? Who will be responsible for the incident, etc. etc.
        1. kig
          kig 14 June 2021 04: 15
          0
          Quote: voyaka uh
          In serial there will be no felling.

          Quote: Coward
          Will

          As they do, so it will be. request
        2. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 14 June 2021 10: 43
          +2
          I repeat. This is a prototype.
          The use of such drones will be predominantly in PLO.
          They are deployed by a wide network in the oceans to track submarines.
          Tracked - passed on to Poseidon.
          They will not enter any civilian ports. Only for
          military bases.
          Large ships of a completely different design will be used to transport ammunition.
          And on this - electronics, software are being worked out.
    4. Gunther
      Gunther 14 June 2021 01: 51
      0
      Quote: Petrol cutter
      Why does an unmanned ship / vessel need a wheelhouse? With a bunch of windows ... Who will look in them? ...

      +
      Well Duc, it is said - the ship is unmanned, here they are, horned devils, and look)))
      Well, the "support" group - otherwise it will sail to China, or it will ram someone in the port, I think 2% in the Panama Canal is when witnesses with soap dishes.
    5. Coward
      Coward 14 June 2021 02: 03
      0
      "Why does an unmanned ship / vessel need a wheelhouse?"
      This is for the mooring teams. The bottom line is that after loading in the port, the mooring team takes the ship to the roadstead and leaves the board. After the ship arrives at the port of unloading, the reverse operation takes place. The Japanese tried to launch this project in the last century, but for a number of reasons it “did not take off”.
      1. petrol cutter
        petrol cutter 14 June 2021 16: 01
        0
        Attends the thought - will it not be cheaper to push / push it in tugboats to the same roadstead?
        How to fence the superstructure with all the machinery, which is used every few months request
        1. Coward
          Coward 15 June 2021 04: 37
          0
          A mast for running lights and radar antennas is one hell of a thing. KSO shields, radar displays, autopilot equipment should be placed in a room convenient for maintenance. Well, plus a distrust of everything new. So so far, without a bridge in any way. The only thing is that there is no need to build a full-fledged superstructure under it. Below is a photo of a container ship with a bridge without a superstructure, only closed gangway shafts from Pr. and L.B.
  8. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 13 June 2021 18: 48
    +3
    I am worried about the fuel separators that prepare fuel for the main engine fuel injection pump, and who will clean them. What are the fuel tanks and service tanks, "medical" clean, especially after a storm?
    1. petrol cutter
      petrol cutter 13 June 2021 20: 14
      +1
      Presumably, their resource is designed for non-maintenance. For routine maintenance.
      These are just my guesses.
      In any case, this is a very troublesome business.
      Drones in the seas ...
      Is the game worth the candle today ...
      Big / big question.
    2. Sanichsan
      Sanichsan 14 June 2021 01: 17
      +3
      IMHO, the domestic underwater glider is much more promising. autonomy month, torpedo dimensions.
    3. Coward
      Coward 14 June 2021 05: 56
      +1
      Alfa Laval Automatic Separators perform well when maintained according to Alfa Laval recommendations.
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 14 June 2021 06: 05
        0
        In the 2000s, we were supplied with Alfa Laval. The third watch was happy. Even then, this gizmo could have feedback with the manufacturer, if of course it was provided. The third mechanic was "happy" when he received a full bunker of Russian fuel oil, but why put the earth for the volume in fuel oil .And seawater during bunkering from the rostanker was received more than once.
        1. Narak-zempo
          Narak-zempo 14 June 2021 09: 09
          0
          Quote: tralflot1832
          but why put the earth for the volume in fuel oil

          That is, how is it why? For the same volume.
          This is a business.
          You will also ask why the meat is pumped with water before being sold laughing
          Quote: tralflot1832
          And seawater during bunkering from the rostanker, more than once received

          Yes, yes, tell me also that in Europe and America they do not cheat with fuel.
  9. rocket757
    rocket757 13 June 2021 19: 03
    -1
    Lord of the Ghost Fleet
    ... The name ... Hollywood, and so, the autopilot is nothing more.
    1. dauria
      dauria 13 June 2021 21: 19
      +2
      , and so, the autopilot is nothing more.


      Yeah ... "just something." MTBF at 8000 km for all systems must be done. And mechanics, and electrics, and electronics. Here, a lousy car on land and in warmth without dampness, no, no, yes, it has to do with handles.
      What is there - a computer in the room and then ... it will freeze, then clean it from dust, then you will pull the lace. And on this trough there is no one even to wave a sledgehammer, or to wipe the drops and salt from the lens, if that.
      No, this figurine is worthy of respect.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 13 June 2021 22: 48
        0
        And who said that a good, reliable autopilot is not worthy of respect, to everyone who created such a technique?
        It's just a name ... pretentious, funny, and so, worked great.
        1. kig
          kig 14 June 2021 04: 18
          +1
          Quote: rocket757
          worked great

          Yeah. Previously, there were references to automated vessels without a crew in the press, but none of them mastered the test trip.
  10. Avior
    Avior 13 June 2021 19: 15
    -1
    It is difficult to understand why the unmanned vessels suddenly caught fire?
    Okay, in aviation, where the place of a person is saved and the size of the UAV is smaller, a person still does not repair the aircraft in flight.
    But what's the problem with keeping the minimum crew on board?
    You won't save much space at his expense, even minimal repairs - with a crew is possible, without him - a problem.
    There is no need to make a transport vessel unmanned.
    Well, maybe unmanned can be adapted to search for submarines, but transport
    1. OgnennyiKotik
      OgnennyiKotik 13 June 2021 19: 41
      +2
      Autonomy is orders of magnitude higher.
      A person needs space for work and rest, food, drinking and technical water, means to maintain life. This is the main limitation in autonomy, not fuel. Without a person, a ship or submarine can be at sea for years. At the same time, they have a very modest size.
      This is, first of all, reconnaissance and anti-aircraft defense.
      Further, all active equipment can be placed on an unmanned ship. Radar, communication systems, sonars. They are not afraid that they will be seen and destroyed. And just make false goals out of them.
      1. Avior
        Avior 13 June 2021 19: 47
        +1
        The article is about transport speech.
        Even a minimum crew of 3 will remove many of the problems of a crewless vessel.
    2. isv000
      isv000 14 June 2021 00: 39
      +1
      [quote] There is no need to make a transport ship unmanned. [/ quot
      After honing the system, the ships will be built differently: the reserve of the ship's hull for the maintenance of the crew will go to the capacity of the additional cargo, and if something happened, the insurance would cover everything ... hi
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. Cat Alexandrovich
    Cat Alexandrovich 13 June 2021 19: 22
    -4
    What is the name of the analogue of a warrant officer in the navy? wink There will be no such at least on such ships! wink
  13. K-50
    K-50 13 June 2021 20: 29
    +2
    Unmanned US Navy vessel autonomously traveled more than eight thousand kilometers

    What a marvel! fellow
    The Flying Dutchman sailed without a crew for decades! lol
  14. Charik
    Charik 13 June 2021 21: 02
    -2
    and that we ourselves are already tired of killing, let the robots do it
  15. pytar
    pytar 13 June 2021 21: 34
    -1
    Robotic more and more. On land, in the air, on water and under water! And they have been in Space for a long time! They work for tens of years for millions of kilometers from the Earth, at distances inaccessible to humans! 21 century!
    1. isv000
      isv000 14 June 2021 00: 02
      +1
      21 century!

      Or there will be more ... If you think about it, most of the mechanical work can be built into an algorithm and, in fact, into software, which will replace whole bunches of professions with robots. Science fiction writers define this moment in different ways: from the golden age of mankind with the development of creative thought to complete devastation and anarchy with the prosperity of the "golden billion". We just have to determine our path ... hi
      1. pytar
        pytar 14 June 2021 08: 59
        -1
        Definitely humanity is on the road to the cross! To technological slavery and total control over the individual or to a kind of communism, in which technological progress will give more freedom to people. hi
  16. Maks1995
    Maks1995 13 June 2021 22: 10
    +2
    They also have an underwater drone that has already circumnavigated the world ...

    But Poseidon, overexposure and nuclear-rocket, I don't remember the name ... somewhere there ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. isv000
        isv000 14 June 2021 00: 41
        0
        at a depth of up to 1000 km,

        Ochepyatka! Don't hit it painfully! .. winked
    2. K298rtm
      K298rtm 14 June 2021 20: 27
      0
      And back in the late 80s we had practically a drone (of course not thousands of miles, but so far from the CPU I got to the CCP in the 8th and returned to the CPU I found that the boat was moving in drone mode - everyone was sleeping in the CPU, or just sitting eyes closed) plowed the Atlantic at the optimum depth for several hours. So these technologies are not very new.
  17. isv000
    isv000 13 June 2021 23: 55
    +3
    Quote: Mitroha
    Storm

    Who will patch up the holes, start up the plaster, make the sails out of the tarpaulin when the drone loses its course? Correct answer: Lloyd, a violinist is not needed ... Do not beat with minuses, I understand that it is cynical, but we are being led to this. There will soon be a couple - three watching on the steamer ................... hi
  18. stalkerwalker
    stalkerwalker 14 June 2021 01: 56
    +1
    Who needs it, this drone? What is its functionality? To cut the waters of the world ocean? Such experiments were carried out by the Danes at the turn of the 80s-90s of the last century.
    Next.
    The drone was not on the busiest roads. And on the approach to the Panama Canal, the crew got on board, without which the towing operations necessary to pass through the canal are impossible.
    How much bunker does he charge? If the drone will "carry" only itself, then it will have enough gasoline.
    If we consider the drone as a cargo ship, then its payload is zero.
    On the reliability of structures and mechanisms.
    Experimental prototypes are not serial ships, with all their inherent disadvantages. It is not for nothing that there is a mechanic in the central control room, who keeps the GSO under the control. And I am ready to intervene in case of an emergency.
    Also on the navigating bridge is the navigator, who controls the situation around the vessel. Not only change course and speed to diverge from other vessels, but change the entire route if necessary, in case of stormy weather.
    And the last.
    A seagoing vessel requires, in addition to everything, constant monitoring of its condition as a whole, which was avoided on a drone, by simplifying the design to either a submarine going on the surface, or to a sealed speedboat, which is not in danger.
    Summary.
    Radio-controlled toys that can move around ponds in the form of boats are no worse than the drone under discussion. Only the sizes are different.
    This drone will not be able to carry cargo with financial profit. Use installed weapons? Yes, but not requiring a recharge. In fact, it will be a marine drone, requiring a supply and control vessel, as well as a repair crew. Even if they are used as self-propelled ammunition depots. The participation of a person, and more than one, will be necessary in any case. And it's easier - to put the crew, and not engage in nonsense in the form of PR-actions.