NATO Secretary General was asked about the presence of intelligence about the "involvement of the Russian Federation" in the forced landing of the Ryanair aircraft in Minsk

23
The NATO Secretary General was asked about the presence of intelligence about the "involvement of the Russian Federation" in the forced landing of the Ryanair aircraft in Minsk

British journalists asked NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg to comment on the situation with the forced landing of a Ryanair plane at Minsk airport. We are talking about an airplane that was flying from Athens to Vilnius and on board which was the Belarusian opposition leader Roman Protasevich. Recall that the aircraft crew received information that an explosive device may be on board. Then a Belarusian Air Force fighter appeared next to the airliner, the commander of the aircraft made a decision to land at the Minsk airport.

Stoltenberg was asked "does NATO have intelligence that would indicate Russia's involvement in this incident?" The NATO functionary did not answer this question directly. Stoltenberg said he cannot talk about specific intelligence.



Secretary General of the North Atlantic military bloc:

I cannot go into details. But I can say for sure what we know about close contacts between Belarus and Russia in various fields, including Aviation and airspace. It should also be noted that Russia is one of the few countries that has not condemned the forced landing of a Ryanair airline in Minsk. But the plane flew from the capital of one NATO country to the capital of another country of the alliance.

Stoltenberg added that at the moment, relations between NATO and Russia "are at the lowest level since the end of the Cold War." It would be strange if these relations were at a high level and were warm and friendly, given that NATO is pushing its military infrastructure to the Russian borders and at the same time blames Russia for all its sins. Even in the landing of the plane in Minsk, NATO is trying to find the notorious "hand of Moscow".

Stoltenberg:

We take seriously those military and non-military threats, as well as aggressive actions on the part of Russia.

Of course, Mr. Stoltenberg does not consider NATO's actions aggressive.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    23 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +11
      13 June 2021 14: 37
      NATO Secretary General was asked about the presence of intelligence about the "involvement of the Russian Federation" in the forced landing of the Ryanair aircraft in Minsk
      ... Strange, they have not yet realized that the local people are using the "most reliable" sources, such as OBS!
      1. -2
        13 June 2021 14: 50
        But the plane flew from the capital of one NATO country to the capital of another country of the alliance.

        I agree, let Belarus pay for the spent kerosene and worn out tires of the aircraft due to the intermediate landing.
        1. +3
          13 June 2021 15: 55
          British journalists followed the well-trodden path, high-likes. Now in their publications they will correct Stoltenberg, it turns out that he answered in the affirmative, and it will rush ... through the pipes
        2. +4
          13 June 2021 17: 57
          Quote: figvam
          I agree, let Belarus pay for the spent kerosene and worn out tires of the aircraft due to the intermediate landing.

          Nehru to pay anything.
          I don’t like to fly straight, but let them bend around at least through the penguin.
          But for their own.
      2. +3
        13 June 2021 17: 24
        Quote: rocket757
        NATO Secretary General was asked about the presence of intelligence about the "involvement of the Russian Federation" in the forced landing of the Ryanair aircraft in Minsk
        ... Strange, they have not yet realized that the local people are using the "most reliable" sources, such as OBS!


        Well, yes, from social networks ...
        1. +2
          13 June 2021 18: 56
          So who fills these very social networks with the most "reliable" information? The same "grandmothers, granddaughters, bugs" and others are the same.
          1. +3
            13 June 2021 20: 59
            I don't understand everything, but when, in all seriousness, specials. services refer to information from the trash heap, it becomes uncomfortable ...
            1. +2
              13 June 2021 22: 36
              The times of the "knights of the cloak and dagger", who PRODUCE information, have sunk into oblivion!
              Now the bespectacled egg-heads are sitting and sifting through the World Wide Web ... the quality of what is found and slipped to the authorities depends on the imagination and strength of the "bamboo" with which they periodically cheer up ... it would be funny if it weren't so scary.
    2. +4
      13 June 2021 14: 40
      NATO Secretary General was asked about the presence of intelligence about the "involvement of the Russian Federation" in the forced landing of the Ryanair aircraft in Minsk

      And what to ask him is just a talking head, he does not decide anything))))
      1. +4
        13 June 2021 15: 02
        Quote: lucul
        And what to ask him is just a talking head, he does not decide anything))))

        In terms of resourcefulness, I would compare him with Psaki. But the journalists touched me! Take it out and put it in the intelligence! At least a little, but they will sign it, decipher it!
    3. +4
      13 June 2021 14: 41
      Duc of the British Foreign Ministry confirmed that there is no evidence of Russia's involvement in the competent landing of Ryanair in Minsk, and that was the day before yesterday. He is not insane, taking all the responsibility on himself. It's sometimes scary to lie.
      1. +4
        13 June 2021 16: 23
        Yes, I didn't lie outright. But he hinted at high-likes. And the women of magazines have to polish themselves!
    4. +5
      13 June 2021 14: 44
      Of course, Mr. Stoltenberg does not consider NATO's actions aggressive.
      How can the actions of a military bloc be aggressive !? soldier
    5. +4
      13 June 2021 14: 48
      What a liar! What "coercion" ... When did the plane turn to Minsk and when did the fighter appear? Jugglers with facts. True "truth-tellers"!
    6. +1
      13 June 2021 15: 05
      Stoltenberg's penis was "for" such an idea with every fiber of his dusky, but he did not yet express his thoughts out loud. ....
    7. +3
      13 June 2021 15: 51
      There is, of course, data for them, BUT .... these data and their source are so secret that they will not be disclosed. Gentlemen have to take their word for it.
    8. +7
      13 June 2021 16: 06
      NATO peacefully pokes at Russia with a knife, Russia is aggressively dodging!
    9. +2
      13 June 2021 16: 07
      I read the title of the article and understood what the NATO Secretary General would say.
      ... what we know about close contacts between Belarus and Russia
      Any events are associated with Russia. For example, drunken NATO soldiers, when the Estonians took them off the train, also could not do without the Russian special services. fool
    10. +2
      13 June 2021 17: 23
      Even in the landing of the plane in Minsk, NATO is trying to find the notorious "hand of Moscow".


      Let them search, find a fig ...
      1. 0
        13 June 2021 18: 04
        Quote: cniza
        Let them search, find a fig ..

        And they will immediately understand that the fig is directed in their direction. hi
    11. -1
      14 June 2021 07: 10
      we know there is data but we will not show it to you because you have no documents)))))
    12. +1
      14 June 2021 08: 18
      "Stoltenberg added that at the moment, relations between NATO and Russia “are at the very low level since the end of the Cold War. ""

      And do not try to raise them! angry
    13. 0
      14 June 2021 17: 05
      Stoltenberg yap. He sank so much. that already everyone can see that he drank himself to death.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"