NATO intends to abandon the deployment of land-based installations of nuclear missiles in Europe

NATO will not deploy land-based nuclear missiles in Europe. This decision is planned to be taken at the upcoming NATO summit in Brussels, which will be held on Monday, June 14.

According to Defense News, referring to its own sources, on the eve of the meeting of US and Russian Presidents Joe Baden and Vladimir Putin, NATO decided to come up with an initiative to abandon the deployment of ground-based missiles with nuclear warheads in Europe. At the NATO summit, which will be held tomorrow, Monday, this proposal will be put to a vote and must be adopted.

According to two officials representing Europe and the United States, a clause banning the deployment of nuclear missiles on European territory has already been included in the draft final communiqué of the summit.

According to the newspaper, having made such a decision, NATO will try to relieve tension in relations with Russia. In addition, the decision should set the stage for discussions on arms control between Biden and Putin.

Earlier, the media reported that the leaders of the two countries at a meeting in Geneva will certainly raise the issue of further arms control. Against the background of the termination of the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (INF Treaty) and the US attempts to finally bury START-3, this issue becomes very urgent. Moscow has repeatedly stated that if the United States refuses to deploy missiles in Europe, Russia will also not deploy its ground installations in the European part of the country.

Comments

[Popandos]

NATO decided to take the initiative to abandon the deployment in Europe of ground-based missiles with nuclear warheads

This is a good decision, otherwise the chances of the demise of civilization increase very dramatically.
How do you check them, though? We need a mechanism to control the adversaries.

[Cat Alexandrovich]

To hell with their initiatives. Let them implement it first, then we'll see. And discuss.

[Popandos]

Yes, they have already promised so many times and so many things that they have earned the "honorary" title of pisabol

[Aleksandre]

Quote: Popandos

Yes, they have already promised so many times and so many things that they have earned the "honorary" title of pisabol

"Yes, I swore to love him to the grave! But I didn't swear to keep my oath ..." (c)

[Lionnvrsk]

Quote: Popandos

Yes, they have already promised so many times and so many things that they have earned the "honorary" title of pisabol

I think that we too can promise not to deploy nuclear missiles in their Europe!

[Fedor M]

And "pisa" and "bala"

[Murmur 55]

So with Humpbacked the promises gave a ride, so they think, and what and what if.

[Pessimist22]

They need to be informed that any provocation from any NATO country will mean a massive nuclear missile strike against the United States and England.

[Zorro21]

Quote: Pessimist22

massive nuclear missile strike on the USA and England

Do you think American political puppets will be very worried that someone, somewhere, because of their ambition will suffer?
Until the clans of Western oligarchs, the main customers and sponsors of world militarization and Russophobia, are specified as the primary targets in the Russian and Chinese military doctrine. These moneybags will continue to arrange provocations, knowing that at any moment they will be able to hide in their shelters on the islands, in Australia or in their African colonies.
Do not forget the true culprits of the 1st and 2nd world wars. Hitler, of course, is still a scumbag, but what could he do without the support of his financial tycoons.

[venik]

Quote: Cat Alexandrovich

To hell with their initiatives. Let them implement it first, then we'll see. And discuss.

=========
And no "verbal" agreements! How many of them have already been! Only agreements with clearly defined control measures for their observance!

[lucul]

This is a good decision, otherwise the chances of the demise of civilization increase very dramatically.

The usual trick - after all, there is not a word about the ban on the deployment of nuclear missiles on submarines. And the United States has a lot of them.
Why would they place missiles in Europe if they already have them on their submarines?
But they demand from us in return

Russia will also not place its ground installations in the European part of the country.

Feeling cheated? ))))

[Katanikotael]

Yes, everything is much simpler - ground-based missiles are a little outdated. in the meantime, a new one is being developed and re-armed, why not make a peacekeeping gesture to the president and force the Russians to lay out what was where and how much.

[tralflot1832]

And they are not going to remove the air-launched missiles. They just suspect that we already have it, but they have everything in the blueprints. The American way of stalling for time, passed. Just as soon as our projects of medium-range missiles will be taken, they will pester Iskander.

[Murmur 55]

They compensate for the absence of ground-based missiles in the air and sea segments, and the message is simple, we "remove" ground-based complexes and you include in the agreement on the reduction of new samples on which they poke a finger.

[tralflot1832]

I think the Gorbachev era has sunk into oblivion, but they will try to stick their finger in. But after all that we have experienced, their finger will end up in Stoltenberg's anus.

[nonsense]

why would you make such a conclusion? - Gorbachev's times CONTINUE! Russian officials constantly call the NATO fascist bastard exclusively as PARTNERS! - For them, they are just partners - keepers of money stolen in Russia and guarantors of the safety of their children and grandchildren living in NATO countries ... Nothing has changed since the Gorbachev era ... the situation has even worsened! - Russia is immeasurably weaker than the USSR and NATO troops are already on the border of Russia (on the territory of the former USSR) ...

[tralflot1832]

Why panic, the Russian General Staff is not in any panic. Do not count other people's money, where they want to let them study. The most important thing is the power of the Russian army is growing!

[lucul]

Russia is immeasurably weaker than the USSR

Under the USSR, we always asked for negotiations, and made total concessions, but now they are asking for negotiations - do you feel the difference? ))))

[Paranoid50]

Quote: nespich

Gorbachev's times CONTINUE!

On the last word "caps" stuck. Apparently, modern gadgets have already learned to reproduce the emotions of their owners - in this case, we are observing hysteria.

[rotmistr60]

NATO will not deploy land-based nuclear missiles in Europe

Before a meeting with the Russian president, you can still promise something, and later forget it nicely. All this has already happened over the past 20 years: not the spread of NATO to the east, missile defense against Iran, but not Russia, constant exercises near our borders, but supposedly practicing "defense" ... I am sure that not a single statement or statement of NATO is especially if it is connected with Russia it should not be taken as a fact.

[Egoza]

Quote: rotmistr60

I am sure that not a single statement or statement by NATO, especially if it is related to Russia, should be taken as a fact.

Right! These jackals cannot be trusted. But here it is interesting

Moscow has repeatedly stated that if the United States refuses to deploy missiles in Europe, Russia will also not deploy its ground installations in the European part of the country.

Are there already installed ones? And those that have already been installed will not be redeployed? I hope that this is just about future new installations promised.

[rotmistr60]

I hope...

I also hope that, taught by the bitter American experience, we will no longer make any concessions or weaken our security for the sake of imaginary "good relations".

[lucul]

All this has already happened in the last 20 years.

What do we need their refusal to place on the ground? After all, they always have submarines, which are not covered by this decree, and which can always be fitted into the Baltic and Black Seas)))

[Lara Croft]

Quote: lucul

After all, they always have submarines, which are not covered by this decree, and which can always be fitted into the Baltic and Black Seas)))

The depths seem to be shallow in the Baltic. But. See the adjacent discussion thread today:

The Senate Armed Services Committee expressed concern about the plans of acting. Minister of the Navy Thomas Harker to cut funding for the creation of a nuclear CD. As explained in the Navy, equipping ships with this type of weapon will create budgetary and logistical problems.

https://topwar.ru/184034-amerikanskie-zakonodateli-trebujut-osnastit-korabli-jadernymi-krylatymi-raketami.html

[AlexVas44]

... at the upcoming NATO summit in Brussels on Monday 13 June.

Well this is what decision can be made on Monday, June 13th. Is NATO celebrating our day of Russia?

[tralflot1832]

Today is 13, but definitely not Monday!

[AshPoseidon]

Is NATO celebrating our day of Russia?

Rather, they mark the collapse of the USSR

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

Lay too soft. Before the meeting ....

[Daria33]

This cannot but confuse ...

[boris epstein]

And what about not deploying ANY missiles AT ALL? And not only the promises of the West, but the agreements concluded with it cannot be trusted. The West does not comply with them either. Take, for example, the Treaty on Flank Restrictions. There are NATO bases in the Baltics and Poland. In Ukraine, Ochakov and Nikolaev.

[AshPoseidon]

More should be asked of NATO. Disband the alliance. Remove all US bases with all available launchers and nuclear arsenals from the Eurasian continent. Only then will the tension subside.

[isv000]

Quote: Ash Poseidon

Disband the alliance

Back in 1954, the USSR applied to join NATO - they shook it up, shut up ... Brezhnev, Yeltsin tried the same thing. Why is another story. Conclusion - the alliance is made for! destruction of the USSR / Russia. The Warsaw Pact has been dissolved and ... NATO is already in Ukraine. Now who will win, and it's only a matter of time ...

[Prisoner]

Apparently something they have is not glued to the protection of ground-based launchers from Russian missiles. So we decided to try to exchange a dead ram for a live bull.

[cniza]

Apparently, they will also demand that we remove the settings ...

[tralflot1832]

Probably they are afraid of the ubiquitous UAVs. The Turks intimidated everyone with their Bayroktar, even their own,

[cniza]

NATO decided to come up with an initiative to abandon the deployment in Europe of land-based missiles with nuclear warheads.

Take it down in Romania and Poland, then you can talk ...

[nonsense]

our Western eyeballs will again merge Russia ... If the Iskanders are left without nuclear warheads, then the very meaning of their existence disappears. And with the overwhelming advantage of NATO in aviation and the navy (as carriers of these very nuclear weapons), in principle, they do not need these ground installations. But for Russia, ground-based nuclear weapons are fundamentally important for "equalizing" combat potentials ...
PS: but the ground-based UVPs of the Mk 41 type, which in Poland and Romania do the Americans consider falling under the term "ground-based carriers of nuclear weapons"? - Or does it pass them as "air defense / missile defense"?

[fif21]

Withdrawal of NATO troops from the Baltic States, Poland, Georgia! This is what Russia is waiting for! This is already beyond the "red line". Also, the breeding ground for biological weapons (bio laboratories along the perimeter of the Russian Federation) must be eliminated. Otherwise, the world will not end.

[isv000]

Withdrawal of NATO troops

They can do this only as prisoners of war, they will not leave peacefully. Whoever dares that detachments from the Naglo-Saxons will suppress ...

[aszzz888]

At the NATO summit, which will be held tomorrow, Monday, this proposal will be put to a vote and it must be accepted.

This is how they will accept, then there will be a conversation.

[isv000]

This is how they will accept, then there will be a conversation.

Accept that they will accept, why not accept after a good day at work?

[Kelwin]

What, scary?) Striped ...)

[Soldatov V.]

Let them do what they want. They have no faith. The main thing is that our people do what is needed to defend the country. Enough for us labeled, drunks, lawyers in power. We need people of business more than ever.

[isv000]

NATO will not deploy land-based nuclear missiles in Europe.

Well, it means that you have to read the opposite. Lay softly ...

[Reserve buildbat]

Good idea. There is only a question: nuclear missiles will not be delivered, and nuclear bombs will be gradually taken away all over Europe?

[DrRey]

Do not count your chickens before they are hatched. Promising does not mean getting married. They have an Mk-41 launcher that allows them to fire both anti-aircraft and cruise missiles. There are a bunch of nuclear bombs - will they dismantle all this and take it out? And can we control this?

[garik77]

Who will believe this here?