US predicts slowdown in modernization of Russian troops

73

The constant imposition of sanctions against Moscow began to bear fruit: the Russian military-industrial complex faced the threat of falling profitability due to shrinking foreign markets, which ultimately could slow down the modernization of troops. This opinion is expressed by analysts of the American organization RAND, who predict that “the decline in exports weapons will hit the scale of production. "

The question is, can these sanctions damage the Russian defense industry enough to curb the Kremlin's ["aggressive"] behavior?

- experts point out.



Currently, the US blacklist includes more than 700 Russian individuals and legal entities, companies and organizations, including those working in the military-industrial complex. As RAND observers explain, the measures taken against the Russian Federation forced Moscow to speed up the import substitution program, which has already led to delays in the rearmament of troops, in particular, to delays in the supply of the Su-57 fighter. At the same time, the hope for Chinese components did not justify itself:

They could not match the quality of goods that Russia previously imported from Ukraine or countries that joined the United States, such as Germany and Japan.

- analysts believe, pointing out that "over time, these problems may affect the quality and durability of Russian modern conventional weapons," including those going to foreign markets.

The sale of weapons is one of the main items of the RF's foreign trade income, and its decline has already been observed. According to SIPRI, Russia's arms exports over the past four years (2016–2020) have decreased by 22% compared to the previous four years (2011–2015).

The decline in export sales increases the costs that the Russian military will have to pay to modernize troops, since economies of scale will not be as beneficial.

- RAND analysts conclude.
73 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +16
    12 June 2021 14: 55
    arms exports from Russia over the past four years (2016–2020) decreased by 22% compared to the previous four years (2011–2015)

    The political and economic pressure of the United States affects those countries that want to acquire our weapons, this is the West's market and democracy.
    1. 0
      12 June 2021 15: 09
      A simple, Russian and Orthodox thermonuclear aviation bomb, developed in the USSR by a group of nuclear physicists under the leadership of Academician of the USSR Academy of Sciences I.V. American experts even today, but only this will be the last surprise in their life, because they will instantly appear before the chief of the Anglo-Saxons, the devil! And there they will also receive Kuz'kina-mother, a thrashing for their stupidity! laughing
      1. -22
        12 June 2021 15: 21
        Only a very stupid person can say that. If you have nothing to lose at all, then ask your wife, children, grandchildren, do they want the Orthodox thermonuclear bomb to surprise American experts? I think you will hear in response, and maybe feel on your face very weighty arguments, so as not to even think about this "surprise".
        1. +3
          12 June 2021 15: 27
          Excuse me for upsetting you with my stupidity, but not everyone can be born Spinoza like you hi Anglo-Saxons jelly, you are our compassionate laughing A pacifist from God? Has your cheek already been cooked?
          1. -16
            12 June 2021 15: 32
            Only a pathological cannibal can want nuclear war and flaunt weapons of mass destruction as something worthy of respect. Don't shy away, ask your grandson if he wants to live in a bunker underground and has mold coming off the walls.
            1. +5
              12 June 2021 15: 38
              Yes, we are the Scythians (cannibals)! Yes, Asians are we
              With slanted and greedy eyes! laughing And the Anglo-Saxons are white and fluffy, because it was the Russians who invented the nuclear bomb and threw off a couple of cities ... When you answer my question, where do you come from so naive? However, the blessed ones are our Russian heritage, our primordial! Therefore, respect and respect to you, if, of course, you are from Russia!
            2. +12
              12 June 2021 15: 56
              A pathological cannibal and a stupid person flaunting nuclear weapons is the author of the "Schlesinger doctrine." This figure was right up to our wives, children, grandchildren and their further survival in the bunker, embracing with the glowing mold.
              Therefore, demonizing the comment of the forum member Zyablintsev, to put it mildly, is incorrect.
            3. +1
              12 June 2021 16: 24
              Just don't forget to ask him if he wants to live at all !?
            4. +7
              12 June 2021 16: 33
              Quote: spacekitty
              Only a pathological cannibal can want nuclear war and flaunt the means of mass destruction ...


              I have to agree with you, the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaka in a firestorm is the work of the Anglo-Saxon cannibals.
              Regarding the Rend experts, they are only partially right, through the efforts of "useful go otov" the Kremlin camarilla is slowly realizing that it hasn’t resisted the West - there are enough of their own Lomehuz, there are no extra places.
              therefore we are forced to raise the destroyed defense industry, to strengthen the "peaceful atom")))
              the image of Gaddafi - with a chisel in the aphedrone and Saddam dangling in a noose, it contributes ...
            5. 0
              12 June 2021 19: 52
              but for a second imagine (I don’t know where you live) that Russia does not have nuclear weapons .. they didn’t come up with it .. they couldn’t, etc. ..... ????
            6. 0
              13 June 2021 20: 11
              But the only time the atomic bomb was used was just people with "good faces." And if it were not for the atomic program of the USSR, it would be easy to repeat in our country
        2. +2
          12 June 2021 15: 39
          Quote: spacekitty
          Only a very stupid person can say that. If you have nothing to lose at all, then ask your wife, children, grandchildren, do they want the Orthodox thermonuclear bomb to surprise American experts? I think you will hear in response, and maybe feel on your face very weighty arguments, so as not to even think about this "surprise".

          It was the possibility of losing everything that made the threat of the use of nuclear weapons an effective factor. Cuba is still located off the coast of America and the deployment of even non-nuclear weapons on its territory can make the US leadership seriously think about the correctness of its behavior.
      2. -5
        12 June 2021 15: 57
        gathering dust in a warehouse since 1961
        did you hold the candle?
        1. -2
          12 June 2021 16: 20
          This information is a state secret - Are you a choli provider? laughing
          1. -4
            12 June 2021 17: 13
            So you are either a shpien or a liar. laughing
            1. -5
              12 June 2021 17: 27
              Your logic is flawless, like that of the Anglo-Saxons! laughing Taking off my hat! hi
              1. -6
                12 June 2021 19: 57
                Where am I to your puffy cheeks and swinging a hooray laughing
                Yes, and apparently you will drop a bomb from an invisible paraglider laughing
                And smart scientists and military men from the USSR switched to missiles so as not to enter the enemy's air defense zone. But on a paraglider you will overcome it unnoticed, like a shpien hi
                1. -5
                  12 June 2021 20: 01
                  They wrote something unintelligible again - so soon they will make fun of you on VO! You specifically state your thoughts, otherwise nothing is clear! hi
                  1. -5
                    12 June 2021 20: 04
                    So you also don't understand Russian well. laughing Well, definitely shpien laughing
                    1. -4
                      12 June 2021 20: 06
                      You can be sarcastic, I understood that, but what did they mean?
                      1. -5
                        12 June 2021 20: 07
                        Read, think, try to get in touch with the Center.
                      2. -4
                        12 June 2021 20: 09
                        Clear! For sim I take my leave! hi Went with the center (and you so respectfully write "Center" with a capital letter, by any chance you are not in touch with him?) get in touch! laughing
                      3. -1
                        12 June 2021 20: 14
                        As we say in Russia: Good luck, good road! laughing
                      4. -3
                        12 June 2021 20: 18
                        You don't look like a Russian, for some reason ... Boris! laughing
      3. +4
        12 June 2021 17: 01
        Quote: Finches
        maybe, if applied,

        Do you really think that the current powers that be, who have a plan to export our resources, will decide to use nuclear weapons? belay
        We pull flows for them, despite their own sanctions, we sell resources for their paper, and you mean Kuzka's mother! lol
        1. -8
          12 June 2021 17: 06
          Why not then? Streams streams, and Kuzkina-mother, Kuzkina-mother-one does not interfere with the other ?!
    2. +8
      12 June 2021 15: 09
      "You don't understand! It's different! It's a free market!" laughing
      Or was someone expecting some really healthy competition?)
      1. +4
        12 June 2021 15: 24
        Quote: Otto Köhler
        Or was someone expecting some really healthy competition?)

        Those who were not aware of what was happening when the sanctions were introduced. But the question here rather arises as to why someone believed that the sanctions would not cause us any harm, and how correctly the risks were calculated.
      2. 0
        12 June 2021 16: 15
        Well, we drove stainless steel from Austria before, now we use our 12X ... otherwise the devices were ours, and they remain, well, and that they are somewhat lurid, compared to Western counterparts, but they work the same way ... well, we still use 09G Russian-made, not Ukrainian ...
    3. -3
      12 June 2021 15: 13
      Russia, like the USSR, can move the economy "on a war footing" rather quickly, analysts should understand and remember this. Of course, the production will not be the most "spectacular and stunning", but effective systems, we will fight back.
      There is a big backlog in this ... Only China can do this faster now, but we are not planning to fight it at the moment.
      There are weapons of deterrence, among other things.


      Yes, of course, the sanctions hit the economy, technology, etc. It is foolish to argue with this. However, they also gave impetus to the restoration of industry, and this is a definite plus. The process does not stand still, so not all is lost!
      1. +13
        12 June 2021 15: 19
        Quote: RealPilot
        Russia, like the USSR, can move the economy "on a war footing" rather quickly

        We can't. Don't even build illusions.
        1. +1
          12 June 2021 15: 26
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          Quote: RealPilot
          Russia, like the USSR, can move the economy "on a war footing" rather quickly

          We can't. Don't even build illusions.

          That's it! Then there was the USSR and the leader! And now...
          1. +8
            12 June 2021 16: 02
            Quote: Egoza
            Then there was the USSR and the leader! And now..

            Yes, the leader, in general, has nothing to do with in this case.
            Then there was a different economic order, and enterprises, obliged to maintain idle mobilization capacities, did not care how much it cost.
            And now all these areas have been sold, leased out or simply demolished. The equipment was scrapped, the personnel were fired and lost their qualifications long ago ...
            1. 0
              12 June 2021 17: 07
              Quote: Jacket in stock
              Yes, the leader, in general, has nothing to do with in this case

              A leader and if he really is a leader. It is he who determines the vector of the country's development.
              But in this case, we do not have a leader, but a doll performing what is ordered.
          2. +2
            12 June 2021 16: 04
            And now there is no faith ..
        2. +1
          12 June 2021 15: 28
          Do not think so badly of your people ... as you press everything ... and break off the enemy's horns and write your names on the ruins ...
        3. 0
          12 June 2021 16: 06
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          We can't. Don't even build illusions.

          Do you work in the military-industrial complex? Those who work there do not build illusions, but simply do their job. Illusions are built by those who are not there. Secrecy, however.
          1. +10
            12 June 2021 16: 25
            Quote: Mountain Shooter
            Secrecy, however.

            What secrecy, God bless you.
            For example, the research institute where I once worked.
            Antenna hall and test station are leased.
            The new (at the time of the rebuilding) newly built building for the production of microcircuits will be squeezed out for 3 kopecks of the tax and then sold, there is all sorts of things now. In another building, the bureaucratic office of the State Treasury Department was also taken away for debts.
            The building overlooking the avenue, where my desk stood, is also all leased out - but of course, the "golden mile".
            Personally, I have no illusions about a quick "transition to the rails".
            Especially after the publication in the local press of an open letter from the workers of the pilot plant about wage delays and upcoming layoffs.
            Oh yes, and the former director is also under investigation, and you are talking about illusions ...
            1. +2
              12 June 2021 17: 37
              Quote: Jacket in stock
              Oh yes, and the former director is also under investigation, and you are talking about illusions.

              But I’m on business trips ... not in Moscow. And I see brand new workshops, and factories working in three shifts. Just in the area of ​​radio electronics ... military.
              In Moscow, IMHO, they are not trying to restore anything. Expensive and ineffective.
              And all sorts of such Kamensk-Uralsky, and others like them. They are amazingly prosperous.
          2. +5
            12 June 2021 17: 09
            Quote: Mountain Shooter
            Secrecy, however.

            Secrecy can explain a lot. lol Including non-existent. wink
          3. Alf
            -1
            12 June 2021 20: 08
            Quote: Mountain Shooter
            Do you work in the military-industrial complex? Those who work there do not build illusions, but simply do their job.

            It is not enough to have thousands of tanks and hundreds of aircraft, the most important thing is the steel eggs of the top management, and now there are problems with that.
        4. -3
          12 June 2021 16: 55
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          We can't.

          Yes, you personally do not have to strain, because no one forces you. request However, some frail economist today went ... laughing
          1. +3
            12 June 2021 17: 10
            Can you give a real example where our industry can make a leap when needed?
            1. Alf
              +3
              12 June 2021 20: 09
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              Can you give a real example where our industry can make a leap when needed?

              Open a bigger oil tap There.
              1. +3
                12 June 2021 20: 25
                Quote: Alf

                Open a bigger oil tap There.

                And gas. To spite all the sanctions. laughing
                1. Alf
                  +4
                  12 June 2021 20: 26
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  And gas.

                  This was implied.
                  Quote: Ingvar 72
                  To spite all the sanctions.

                  We will continue to pump them so that they burst there from our oil and gas.
                  1. +2
                    12 June 2021 20: 30
                    Quote: Alf
                    We will continue to pump so that they burst there from our oil and gas

                    And how to promote the achievements of the opening of gas terminals. request
                    There is only one legal way left - the autumn elections.
                    But I think the authorities will screw it up too. And then it will shout for a long time about the hand of the West, although the priests themselves are there.
                    1. Alf
                      +1
                      12 June 2021 21: 11
                      Quote: Ingvar 72
                      But I think the authorities will screw it up too.

                      Who would doubt that.
                      I wonder, in light of the dramatically increased number of C19 cases, will such a vote be reintroduced?
                      1. 0
                        13 June 2021 20: 07
                        HA ha ha, compare the vote in Britain and wash the couch general
    4. +5
      12 June 2021 16: 38
      In fact, back in 2009, those people who were part of the military-industrial complex dominating in technology and problems, but did not listen to them, shouted away from the purchase of certain devices and components for our military-industrial complex! And when, after 7 years, they actually remembered their prophecies, they rushed to "import substitution" forgetting that the backbone of the defense regulations had been killed, that there was a chronic outflow of personnel! !! Take the "completely Russian" Kamaz, how much is ours in it, except for the frame, cabin, and body? In our country, these issues are still not dealt with by professionals, but by "faithful servants of his own self", hence we have what we have — the troubled future of our defense industry. ...
      1. Alf
        +4
        12 June 2021 20: 10
        Quote: Thrifty
        Take the "completely Russian" KamAZ, how much is ours in it, besides the frame, cabin, and body?

      2. +1
        12 June 2021 20: 30
        Quote: Thrifty
        In fact, back in 2009, those people who were part of the military-industrial complex dominating in technology and problems, but did not listen to them, shouted away from the purchase of certain devices and components for our military-industrial complex.

        Operate with the concepts "And I told you!" somehow frivolous.
        No one ever brought up in the discussion of the data - what exactly the Russian military-industrial complex lost as a result of the sanctions. At one time, losses were discussed in connection with the refusal to supply products of the Ukrainian Motor Sich to Russia. And then, with the cries of "We can handle it ourselves!" And that's it ...
        If you read the article from RAND again, you can feel a kind of custom-made stuffing there. Like, "... boss, the mustache is gone ...".
        The first bell rang in 2014 in the Mistral case. But do not forget that after 08.08.08, goods of double value were substituted in Russia.
        China, in turn, is twisting its arms, refusing supplies in accordance with US sanctions.
        But there is no reason to talk about a collapse, or even a slowdown in the modernization of weapons. Because there is no public information.
        "Friendly globalization" is over. Projects are closed with secrets, the FSB is catching "sent Cossacks".
        Thus, only those persons who are exposed by their position in participating in such projects can talk about new developments.
        In Syria, they managed to test about 150 types of new weapons, 25 of which have been removed from service and production.
        And more we will not know anything.
  3. +6
    12 June 2021 15: 02
    In addition to the fall in exports, the sanctions have led to a critical slowdown in programs to create new weapons. Armata, Kurgan, boomerang have no clear prospects for entering the troops or exporting. Although there is a demand for them, the same Kazakhstan purchases and plans to purchase Turkish and South African "Boomerangs". Turkmenistan buys Serbian armored personnel carriers. The rate of admission of the Su-57 is simply negligible.
    Of the relatively new serial weapons, only the Pantsiri and the S-350, everything else that comes is the modernization of Soviet weapons and equipment, and worse than what is exported. It can be stated that our military-industrial complex is not capable of producing new weapons on a sufficient scale.
    Space is the same.
    1. 0
      12 June 2021 15: 09
      It looks like it. Free market in all its glory! We need structural changes in the economy and politics, otherwise we most likely will not survive!
      1. -7
        12 June 2021 15: 52
        Quote: Artyom Karagodin
        otherwise we probably won't survive!

        Somehow too pessimistic. Everything may end up with the fact that we just find out that no one planned to go to war with us.
        1. +6
          12 June 2021 16: 08
          Quote: military_cat
          we'll just find out that no one planned to go to war with us.

          Are sanctions not a war?
          Or do you need only cannon-tanks?
          1. -2
            12 June 2021 16: 14
            Vonya is war, sanctions are sanctions. There is nothing good in sanctions, but I am a supporter of the use of terms in their strict meaning.
        2. +2
          12 June 2021 16: 58
          I don’t think anyone will mind if you are right. But, looking at the mess that is happening in the country, it becomes very alarming. However, if we are engaged in putting things in order, then everything will be fine. So I'm not quite a pessimist. It's just that I'm not indifferent to what will happen to Russia, as well as to you, as well as to the majority (if not all) of VO readers.

          And about "we will not stand" I went overboard. I picked the wrong word. It's just that if we don't start to put things in order inside the country, we risk getting tests of the level of the Great Patriotic War or Civil. That is, when the question of the country's existence will be decided. This is where we usually won, but I would not want to lead to this.
          1. Alf
            +3
            12 June 2021 20: 12
            Quote: Artyom Karagodin
            if they take care of putting things in order,

            Who? EP + The Wisest? Bees versus honey?
    2. +1
      12 June 2021 15: 14
      I agree with most of the theses of your comment, but with all due respect to the Turkish and South African Boomerangs, in the Russian language, nationality and nationality are written with a capital letter. Those. correct "Serbian armored personnel carriers".
      MIC - military-industrial complex... Those. correctly "our military-industrial complex is not coping."
    3. +5
      12 June 2021 15: 17
      Quote: OgnennyiKotik
      In addition to the fall in exports, the sanctions have led to a critical slowdown in programs for the creation of new weapons.

      It has little to do with each other. Yes, plans are not being fulfilled and close, but not sanctions are to blame
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +3
        12 June 2021 16: 10
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        plans are not fulfilled and close, but not sanctions are to blame

        Yes, they are, too.
        Even the ministers do not hide about the problems with access to modern electronics. Even Rogozin "sings" over there.
      3. +1
        12 June 2021 17: 00
        Nobody is going to exclude organizational problems from the list. But we know what the dependence of our equipment on imports is. Has this not affected the pace of development of promising weapons in any way?
  4. -1
    12 June 2021 15: 06
    Well, Americans, they are so Yankees. About rearmament from S-125 to S-300 - they started a war in Karabakh. Yeah, we had a condenser plant there. With the Rearmament from 300 to 400, the Yankees missed the stupidity, but at C 350 they won back. Lord PVoshniki of all countries unite. You will be wetted by a Half Penguin. The accent on the stupid, last syllable. Buy the latest development from Almaz-Antey and sleep well
  5. +1
    12 June 2021 15: 06
    Never mind, the number of states that do not want to completely depend on the Yankees is growing.
    And bypassing the sanctions is not a problem, although this will affect the final cost of the product.
    Do not forget that the PRC and even Turkey are stepping on their heels.
    AND SERIOUSLY to take on the "sawers" of funds
    1. Alf
      +3
      12 June 2021 20: 21
      Quote: knn54
      AND SERIOUSLY to take on the "sawers" of funds

      The marshal's furniture and his pacifier were taken seriously, from all the irons they broadcast about the progress of the investigation. And what is the result? Will they fight themselves?
  6. 0
    12 June 2021 15: 18
    There have always been problems, like sanctions, another thing is that the scale has increased and we have to reckon with this. All hope is for Russian ingenuity and ingenuity in overcoming obstacles.
    1. Alf
      +3
      12 June 2021 20: 22
      Quote: Buhach
      All hope is for Russian ingenuity and ingenuity when overcoming obstacles.

      Sanctions are not as terrible as outright betrayal of the top.
  7. +3
    12 June 2021 15: 21
    "Getting the fruits of sanctions" is a hot topic in the American media space.
    For comparison:
    http://inosmi.ru/politic/20210611/249907371.html
    By the way, the comments of the Americans themselves are very amusing.
  8. +6
    12 June 2021 15: 27
    RAND analysts conclude.
    ... Correct conclusions, in general.
    But to whom it will be a science, I would like to ask.
    The difference between victorious reports and the real state of affairs, oh, how great it is.
  9. -2
    12 June 2021 22: 36
    The impact of sanctions on modernization is secondary. Modernization would have slowed down even in the absence of sanctions, since the breakthrough was made at the expense of the backlog from the USSR. Now it is necessary to develop the achieved achievements with the available forces, and not all enterprises have specialists who are able to do this.
    Now it will be possible to see who at the previous GPV simply "warmed his hands" (having assigned himself unreasonably high salaries), and who invested money in the development of the enterprise.
  10. 0
    13 June 2021 20: 06
    The United States has once again tore the Russian economy to shreds)))))
  11. +1
    16 June 2021 15: 01
    Slowdown in modernization due to falling revenues from arms sales abroad? Truth?!!!!
    Naive Americans ...
    Everything will be according to plan, just the Russians will eat a little less ...