True Velocity 6.8 mm TVCM cartridge: the possible future of the US Army

56

Rifleman RM277-R

Currently, the US Army is conducting the Next Generation Squad Weapon (NGSW) program, which aims to create a promising rifle complex with increased fire performance. Several samples are under development weapons different classes and new ammunition for them. One of the participants in the program is True Velocity of Garland, Texas, which has developed the new 6.8 mm TVCM cartridge.

Promising direction


The core business of True Velocity is the development and manufacture of small arms ammunition with a composite metal and plastic sleeve. At the moment, customers are offered a line of seven cartridges of this kind. All popular calibers are available, from 5.56 NATO to .50 BMG.



The US Army's NGSW program has previously attracted a number of different organizations seeking lucrative contracts for future rearmament. True Velocity decided not to stand aside and also applied. She participates in the program as a developer of a promising cartridge with increased characteristics, compatible with various types of weapons.


Box magazine with 6.8 mm TVCM rounds

The new cartridge was designated 6.8 mm TVCM. It is argued that the accumulated experience in the field of ammunition made it possible to carry out its development in the shortest possible time. This stage took only eight weeks, after which the tests began. To date, True Velocity has mastered the production of cartridges with the ability to produce tens of millions of products per year.

As part of the NGSW program, the cartridge manufacturer has joined forces with General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems. Her automatic rifle RM277-R and light machine gun RM277-AR should use 6.8 mm TVCM ammunition. Not so long ago, GD-OTS transferred all work on this weapon to the newly organized company LoneStar Future Weapons, and in April it announced its continued cooperation with True Velocity.

Cartridges 6.8 mm TVCM are offered for use with advanced weapons of the new development. At the same time, the manufacturer is working on the issues of modernizing existing shooting systems for such ammunition. The first experiments have already been carried out, and the fundamental possibility of such alteration of rifles and machine guns has been confirmed.


Gross cartridge 7.62 mm NATO (left) and new 6.8 mm TVCM

In a composite sleeve


The 6.8 mm TVCM product is a 6,8x51 mm unitary rifle cartridge made using several original ideas. With their help, several tasks were solved and advantages were provided over the existing 7,62x51 mm NATO ammunition.

The new 6.8 mm TVCM cartridge is made in the dimensions of the serial 7.62 mm NATO. It has a total length of 71 mm with a maximum sleeve diameter of 12 mm. Due to the composite sleeve, it was possible to reduce the mass of the cartridge by 30% in comparison with the existing one. Gross 7,62x51 mm, depending on the type of bullet, have a mass of approx. 25 g. Accordingly, the new 6.8 mm TVCM weighs no more than 17-18 g.

Composite sleeve 51 mm long consists of two parts. The bottom and a small part of the wall are made in the form of a metal pallet. The pallet, with the exception of the flange, is placed in a plastic case. To increase the internal volume, the neck and shoulder of the plastic part are made as short as possible. This feature allows the 6.8 mm TVCM to be easily distinguished from other cartridges of the same architecture.


Shooting with a modified M110 rifle

The cartridge is equipped with a pointed ogival bullet with a caliber of 6,8 mm. An enhanced propelling charge is used. Its characteristics make it possible to increase the fire characteristics of the weapon, but keep the pressure in the bore at a safe level. Ignition is carried out using a standard primer.

According to the development company, the new cartridge design has provided a number of advantages over the old 7.62 NATO. Despite the lower weight, the promising 6.8 mm TVCM has improved energy. It has a higher penetration effect according to customer requirements. In addition, the effective range of fire has increased by 50%.

There are other advantages as well. Thus, there are no heavy metals in the design of the new cartridge. The steel base allows you to collect the spent cartridges with a magnet, while the metal and plastic are recyclable. Thus, in accordance with modern trends, the 6.8 mm TVCM cartridge is safer to manufacture and use, and the casings handed over for recycling will ultimately reduce the cost of ammunition.


Machine gun M240B in the process of changing the barrel. 6,8mm cartridge belt ready to load

Compatibility issues


The 6.8 mm TVCM was originally developed for the promising NGSC program, namely for the RM277 products from General Dynamics and LoneStar. Testing of such weapons continues, and thanks to the new cartridge, it shows high performance. Moreover, such a complex has every chance of winning the competition with subsequent putting into service.

True Velocity also offers to use its new cartridge with other samples already in service. 6.8 mm TVCM specially made in the dimensions and proportions of the common cartridge. Due to its external and dimensional similarity, it is fully compatible with magazines, belts and feeding systems under 7.62 mm NATO.

To use a 6,8 mm cartridge, you only need to change the standard barrel to a part of a new caliber with a different chamber. The shutter and other parts, designed for 7,62x51 mm, do not need to be replaced, but additional adjustment may be required. In particular, sighting devices must comply with the new ballistics.


The M134 machine gun with a new cartridge shoots and smokes no worse than with the standard one.

Similar capabilities of the cartridge have already been tested using several prototypes. Under 6.8 mm TVCM re-barreled "bolt" rifle M110, as well as machine guns M240B, KAC LAMG and M134. True Velocity recently released a video showing the shooting of all of these items. In addition, they showed how the M240B machine gun can shoot off the tape of old cartridges, immediately get a new barrel and start firing the promising 6.8 mm TVCM.

Demonstration shooting looks good overall. The weapon successfully empties magazines and belts; firing delays are not observed - or they are simply not shown. It is also argued that with the new cartridge, the old weapon gains an increase in a number of basic characteristics. However, the developers do not specify how the increased power cartridge affects the resource and other parameters of the weapon.

Probable leader


Currently, a rifle complex based on the 6.8 mm TVCM cartridge is being tested, during which it demonstrates the characteristics of all its components. In addition, he must show advantages over competing developments. Apparently, the testing program is proceeding without any unpleasant surprises, which allows True Velocity to be very optimistic.


Founder of the Knight's Armament Co. Reed Knight with a LAMG machine gun rearranged under a 6.8 mm TVCM. Recoil allows shooting with one hand

As part of the NGSW program, the 6.8 mm TVCM product competes with the 6,8 mm telescopic cartridge from AAI / Textron. This architecture of the ammunition has important advantages, but it imposes certain requirements on the weapon. Because of this, the Textron rifle and machine gun are more complex, which negatively affects their reliability. It is not known whether it will be possible to correct this deficiency. AAI has been developing telescopic ammunition for small arms for a long time, but there has not yet been a real technological breakthrough.

Thus, at present, the RM277 complex from GD-OTS / LoneStar with a cartridge from True Velocity can be considered the favorite of the program. In addition, the ammunition from this complex can be used with other weapons, after a slight modification. In theory, all this makes it possible to simultaneously produce new weapons and modernize old ones, which will speed up the rearmament of rifle units with a transfer to a single cartridge of increased power.

The technical features and operational prospects of the complex with the 6.8 mm TVCM cartridge are quite capable of capturing the interest of the Pentagon and influencing its choice. However, tests and refinement of promising rifles, machine guns and cartridges have not yet been completed, and a decision has not yet been made. Companies participating in the NGSW program will have to continue to work and compete with each other. How the situation will develop and whether True Velocity will be able to maintain its advantageous position - time will tell.
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    15 June 2021 18: 13
    In general, a retelling of this video. From 3 minutes, the change of the tape and the barrel is shown, to change the caliber of the machine gun.
    1. +3
      15 June 2021 18: 26
      And I, in general, have the impression that there was already an article about this caliber about a year ago. Here at VO.
      1. +1
        19 June 2021 09: 05
        Year?! About the shooter of the "future" for the US Army, as if not for five years, articles have been flickering, but specifically about the composite 6.8 mm TVCM was published on VO on October 23, 2019 [https://topwar.ru/163856-linejka-strelkovogo-oruzhija- rm277-pod-patron-68-mm.html]

        And there was also a decent volume article comparing three competing NGSW systems. I beg your pardon, but to look for laziness. ;-)
  2. +9
    15 June 2021 18: 13
    I wonder how the plastic will behave in a red-hot barrel? And what will we say in 20 years of warehouse storage? And after a year of lying, for example, in the ground or vice versa in the sun? And so on and so on. Anything can happen .. A gamble is a plastic sleeve, at least for now ..
    1. +2
      15 June 2021 18: 19
      Quote: paul3390
      how will plastic behave in a red-hot barrel?

      No way. The sleeve does not enter the barrel.
      Quote: paul3390
      And what will we say in 20 years of warehouse storage?

      Nothing. Plastic does not rust or deteriorate.
      Quote: paul3390
      And after a year of lying, for example, in the ground or vice versa in the sun?

      Nothing will be plastic.
      1. +21
        15 June 2021 18: 21
        And the chamber is not part of the barrel ??

        How it gets spoiled. Tested on hunting sleeves.

        Will be. Again - proven.
      2. +15
        15 June 2021 18: 37
        Quote: OgnennyiKotik
        ... Nothing will be plastic.

        It looks like you are not a discouraged optimist. Looking at household plastic products, I can say unequivocally that after a couple of years in the sun it begins to collapse very clearly, crumbling and breaking.
        Another thing is that there is very high quality plastic, which has very decent characteristics, but it is usually more expensive than household plastic. The question is the price of a metal and plastic sleeve.
        1. +1
          15 June 2021 19: 49
          Ja dumaju sto vesovoij faktor vazneje ceni dlja matrasov.
          1. +2
            16 June 2021 09: 14
            What about the volume factor?
        2. +2
          16 June 2021 09: 21
          Quote: credo
          looking at household plastic products

          The world of plastic is diverse. Full of plastic, heat-stable and non-destructible under UFO. The properties of plastic are now pretty decently regulated. And taking into account the 30% savings in weight, it would be possible to return from 5,45x39 to 7,62x39 almost without losses in terms of mass characteristics. The whole question is in the modernization of high-speed lines for the production of cartridges and the accumulation of the necessary stocks. And this is not a matter of one year. But all the same, I think it is quite an interesting topic. Perhaps our Central Research Institute is already concerned about it, they simply do not give information to the network ... before the positive results of their searches.
          1. 0
            18 June 2021 14: 15
            it would be possible to return from 5,45x39 to 7,62x39 almost without losses in terms of mass characteristics

            Why do that at all? There will be no gain in effective range from this, in terms of firing accuracy - there will only be a loss (greater recoil momentum).
            1. +1
              18 June 2021 14: 43
              Quote: Terran Ghost
              Why do that at all?

              Exactly then, why does the United States go from 5,56 to 6,8. Obviously, to increase the penetrating ability of the bullet at the ranges of their use, taking into account the modern means of the soldier's satellites.
              1. 0
                18 June 2021 14: 48
                Obviously, to increase the penetrating ability of the bullet at the ranges of their use, taking into account the modern means of the soldier's satellites.

                And what will the transition to the outdated cartridge 7,62x39mm model 1943 give in this regard? For the goal you voiced, you need to make a new cartridge. Ideally, with armor penetration at least at the level of the standard armor-piercing incendiary 7,62x54R, but in a smaller caliber and with less recoil.
                1. +1
                  19 June 2021 08: 07
                  Quote: Terran Ghost
                  And what will the transition to the outdated cartridge 7,62x39mm model 1943 give in this regard?

                  I was talking about the caliber. The patron is a completely different matter. Moreover, the use of a plastic sleeve is no longer an "outdated cartridge", something new, where a bullet may turn out to be new.
      3. +3
        16 June 2021 15: 50
        Quote: OgnennyiKotik
        Plastic does not rust or deteriorate.


        It depends on what kind of plastic.
        Some plastics lose plasticity over time, some under the influence of UV radiation, some absorb moisture, some lose plasticity under the influence of low temperatures, some do not hold high temperatures.
        Most plastics that will satisfy all the requirements at the same time will hardly be cheaper than brass and even more so tombak.
        1. 0
          4 September 2021 20: 34
          It will not be cheaper, but who will consider it, after all, here we are talking about a small gesheft, personally I think this is a fuss of arms corporations, the Americans have had rifles for a grendel for ten years, but they did not switch to it en masse
      4. 0
        17 June 2021 10: 45
        Here the new cartridge is more interesting ... the sleeve can be any. The liner must be well stored, mechanically strong ..... ideally still partially burn out (like on a tank)
        1. 0
          19 June 2021 09: 16
          The dream of a caseless cartridge has kept the military and designers awake for the devil knows how many years. But so far, the only implemented option is the German HK G11 rifle. Which is also nicknamed "the cuckoo clock" for its incredible complexity for military weapons and a large number of small detectives.
          1. 0
            19 June 2021 10: 32
            On the tank .... there is a partially combustible sleeve for a long time.
            1. +1
              19 June 2021 12: 37
              I according to VUS - mech-water T-72 (term 87-89) and have a good idea of ​​what a shot looks like. ;-) A combustible charge sleeve and a pallet that is thrown out through the hatch. But an assault rifle is still not a tank. There are a lot of reservations.
    2. +7
      15 June 2021 18: 36
      After a year of lying in the ground, in my opinion, it is better not to use any cartridge. Under normal storage conditions (zinc and packs), they will be stored no worse than steel ones, or even better. Regarding the red-hot barrel - there are plastics with an operating temperature of over 700g. It is unlikely that under normal conditions, given the low thermal conductivity of the plastic sleeve, it will be possible to heat the chamber to such a temperature.
      1. +4
        15 June 2021 18: 40
        Well - acquaintances somehow of interest for the sake of cartridges from the times of the Second World War shmalnuli, and they lay in the ground since those times just in oiled packs. Taki - bummed!

        As for thermoplastics, this is by no means the first attempt to introduce plastic sleeves. The previous ones failed for the same reason - in the heated chamber, the cartridge cases still led, making extraction difficult.
        1. +3
          15 June 2021 21: 22
          Well - acquaintances somehow made fun of the patrons of the Second World War,

          In 1997, at the ballistic stand, he fired rifle cartridges of the 1946 release. Out of a hundred, three received a muzzle velocity on the shot rifle barrel of 950 m / s (the bulk is 760 m / s). Aging of gunpowder has not been canceled.
      2. +4
        15 June 2021 19: 24
        Quote: puzoter
        Regarding the red-hot barrel - there are plastics with an operating temperature of over 700g.

        Could you give an example?
        I have been working with polymers for many years and somehow I haven’t met yet.

        No composites are required. Nobody will make liners from them in the near future.
        1. 0
          15 June 2021 21: 02
          Organosilicon. I do not know the truth, whether it is possible to make sleeves from them, this is for the technologists.
      3. +1
        16 June 2021 11: 04
        At 700 ° C, the steel splits and turns red. Where have you seen such plastics? The highest temperatures are 300 to a maximum of 400.
        But the barrel to warm up to 700 as long as it can. It won't be much cooler in the chamber.
        1. 0
          16 June 2021 19: 22
          Just for information:
          ..... But things are not so rosy, because back in 1979 Matti Holzberg founded the Polimotor company, whose main task was to create an engine with as many plastic parts as possible. The first polymer engine was a clone of the 2,3-liter four-cylinder engine from Ford Pinto: the cylinder block, pistons, connecting rods, crankcase and most of the cylinder head were made of plastic. For the manufacture of the piston head and liners of the combustion chamber (liners) used aluminum and steel. The crankshaft and valves are also made of metal. The plastic engine power was increased to 300 hp. with., and the weight is reduced to 69 kg (the original engine gave out 88 liters. from. with a mass of 188 kg).
          1. 0
            16 June 2021 22: 37
            From this information, I can see that those elements that are exposed to serious heating are made of metals. And what is the resource of this miracle, that's what I'm interested in?
            1. +1
              17 June 2021 00: 14
              Quote: Herman 4223
              And what is the resource of this miracle, that's what I'm interested in?

    3. 0
      15 June 2021 19: 46
      Not plastic, but composite sleeves.
    4. +2
      16 June 2021 07: 08
      I wonder how the plastic will behave in a red-hot barrel? And what will we say in 20 years of warehouse storage? And after a year of lying, for example, in the ground or vice versa in the sun? And so on and so on. Anything can happen .. A gamble is a plastic sleeve, at least for the time being.

      Fair remark. Plastic has such property as aging - the loss of its original properties and the coefficient of linear expansion of plastics is greater than that of metals, i.e. there may be problems with plastic-to-metal assembly at extreme temperatures.
  3. +3
    15 June 2021 18: 26
    The brass sleeve carries away about a third of the heat from the shot. When using plastic, therefore, it will overheat one third faster.
    1. +4
      15 June 2021 18: 29
      Yes, as if not the other way around - the thermal conductivity of a plastic sleeve is worse, which means the chamber will heat up much less, and the barrel a little more. In general, the heat balance will get better IMHO.
      1. +4
        15 June 2021 19: 46
        Significant heating of the barrel during firing comes from the friction of the bullet, given the good thermal conductivity of the metal barrel when firing in bursts, the chamber is unlikely to heat up less
      2. +4
        15 June 2021 20: 10
        Duc - the red-hot gases won't go anywhere, and the barrel will be heated.
  4. +1
    15 June 2021 18: 34
    Less cartridge weight, more soldiers can take ammunition with them.
    And the caliber is larger than, for example, 5,45, the bullet is more stable in flight.
    Perhaps many will switch to this caliber, of course, all this costs a lot of money.
    But this is still far away, a lot of water will leak.
    1. +1
      15 June 2021 19: 51
      Well, direct advertising was quoted
  5. 0
    15 June 2021 18: 39
    Is 0.8 mm caliber really so straightforward to improve, lengthen, increase and decrease that it is necessary to totally change the barrels?
    1. +4
      15 June 2021 19: 57
      quote = Puzoter] Yes, as if not the other way around - the thermal conductivity of a plastic sleeve is worse, which means the chamber will heat up much less, and the barrel a little more. In general, IMHO, the heat balance will become better. [/ Quote]
      On the contrary, the metal sleeve, due to its high thermal conductivity, takes some of the heat and this slightly cools the chamber.
      If we compare their new cartridge 6.8 with our 5.45x39, then we must take into account the fact that it is in principle possible to create a high-precision machine gun (more correctly with a high density of fire) at 5.45 \ 39, but the 6.8x51 cartridge is unlikely, therefore, to realize an increase of 50% in the effective range fire will not be easy
  6. +1
    15 June 2021 19: 03
    Look at the ballistics of this cartridge, then you can make initial conclusions.
    1. +1
      15 June 2021 20: 13
      Judging by the photo, it looks like a Japanese cartridge from Arisaki or an Italian cartridge from Carcano ..
  7. +3
    15 June 2021 19: 07
    The photo shows not the M 110 but the M24 A3 variant. With the creation of a new cartridge and a new sleeve, our "partners" will simply earn space grandmothers and ensure GDP growth by an extra 1-2%
    1. +3
      15 June 2021 19: 48
      Especially when they force their NATO colleagues to switch to it as it was from 7,62x51.
  8. 0
    15 June 2021 20: 34
    Despite the lower weight, the promising 6.8 mm TVCM has improved energy. It has a higher penetration effect according to customer requirements. In addition, the effective range of fire has increased by 50%.
    What is the reason for all this joy? Is it worth it to leave from 0.82 because of 7.62 mm, because the sleeve can be replaced with it?
    1. 0
      18 June 2021 14: 13
      Is it worth it to leave from 0.82 because of 7.62 mm, because the sleeve can be replaced with it?

      Most likely it's worth it. Best ballistics and bullet penetration.
  9. Lad
    +4
    15 June 2021 23: 13
    Interestingly, what would be the optimal size of this cartridge if it were not adjusted to the existing magazines and chamber?
  10. +1
    16 June 2021 00: 25
    Interesting ammunition.
    I don't see a dulce at all. Apparently inside the sleeve is the muzzle. An interesting solution.
    The sleeve is clearly larger than the 308th. The bullet is probably a long nail with excellent ballistics. It is clear where 50% of the distance comes from.
    Well done in general Americans that made a sleeve with an ass from the 308th. The launch of production has been greatly reduced. And that the bottom made of steel is also good. Anyway, the cartridge case is completely recycled after the shot.
    The only question remains with the use of this ammunition in assault rifles in terms of recoil.
    However, the developers do not specify how the increased power cartridge affects the resource and other parameters of the weapon.

    There are no miracles. Look at the 243 gauge resource. It is 2-3 times less than that of the 308th. But it is just 308 squeezed to 6 mm. And here the sleeve is also more capacious. So the resource will definitely be less. I think at times. And the trunks are not chrome plated. request
  11. +1
    16 June 2021 01: 37
    "Nothing is new under the moon."
    Grandfather Fedorov more than a century ago brought out the optimal minimum rifle caliber - 6.5 mm.
  12. -1
    16 June 2021 08: 23
    And do not forget to put a new barrel for each thousand rounds smile
  13. Lew
    0
    16 June 2021 13: 04
    somehow the soul does not lie to believe in the quality of this cartridge ...
    ..
    maybe the argument that because of the metal bottom it is possible to collect cartridges across the battlefield and turn it over for melting knocked me out of faith in the wonderful future of the cartridge?
    1. 0
      10 January 2022 22: 09
      I shot more than 5 thousand rounds of ammunition in NATO training units for a recruit, so the question of cleaning the shooting range is probably an argument for them.
  14. -2
    16 June 2021 17: 02
    In general, we must take! Himself in service. If it is good and promising, it is necessary to implement it. Buy a license and produce. And it's not a lack of patriotism, etc.
    Best the enemy of the good. And saving on development means saving. And plus in conflicts in third countries, ammunition from the battlefield is a good help. Moreover, I think the Americans will push through its use for NATA.
    All the best to everyone!
    1. 0
      18 June 2021 14: 12
      Buy a license and produce.

      If the cartridge is standardized for use by the countries of the NATO military bloc, then most likely, from a legal point of view, no license will have to be bought. Due to the lack of a valid industrial design patent in principle.
      The ability to copy a cartridge will depend on the composition of the polymer sleeve and the methods of its processing, as well as on the composition of the gunpowder used and, to a lesser extent, the composition and design of the bullets for this cartridge.
  15. 0
    28 June 2021 06: 27
    Does the spent tray carry away enough heat? I remember that the Germans made their G11 with a burning sleeve, so it turns out that the chamber overheats! A metal sleeve takes away a lot of heat, and then there's an increased weight ...
  16. 0
    9 August 2021 21: 30
    There are bacteria (such as Ideonella sakaiensis 201-F6) that decompose plastic .. Theoretically, you can arrange a hell of a sabotage .. and the microbes will devour all the ammunition from the Americans laughing .. Someone is probably already working on this idea.
  17. 0
    2 September 2021 05: 49
    Actually, why not? In the civilian segment, plastic cartridges have been used for a long time. Smoothbore weapons. I am more interested in the caliber of 6,8 mm. Like the cartridge of Arisaki. 5,56 is not enough, and 7,62 is a lot?