Military Review

American press: Soon an aircraft will appear in the US Air Force, for which the S-500 "Prometheus" air defense system will not become a serious problem

93

Component of the S-400 air defense system (illustrative photo)



American journalists from The National Interest distinguished themselves with another statement, which is based primarily on fabrications. This is a statement related to the prospects of the latest S-500 Prometheus anti-aircraft missile system developed in the Russian Federation.

In TNI, referring to the words of the head of the American command for global strikes of the air force Timothy Ray, it is said that soon an aircraft will appear in the US Air Force, for which the S-500 Prometheus will not become a serious problem. The American magazine claims that such an aircraft will be the promising strategic bomber B-21 Raider, implemented using low-visibility technology and capable of carrying thermonuclear weapon on board.

Earlier in the American press it was reported that the B-21 Raider should be adopted by 2027. It should be noted here that by that time, the S-500 Prometey air defense missile systems will be in service with the Russian Armed Forces for several years. In this regard, it is at least strange to say that the S-21 air defense system will not be a serious problem for the B-500 Raider of the US Air Force. It is strange, if only because the B-21 itself is still a problem for the US Air Force in the sense that it has not even taken off into the sky so far. Its first flight is scheduled for 2022, if, as it is added, "associated difficulties are eliminated."

Nevertheless, the American magazine indicates that the B-500 Raider will be able to overcome the air defense built using the S-21 air defense system due to the fact that it "has modularity and open architecture, which will allow implementing various engineering solutions on its platform." ...

The main "advantage" of the B-21 Raider over the Russian S-500 complexes, American journalists called its computer "stuffing", which is capable of "processing large amounts of data in the shortest possible time." Allegedly, this will allow the strategic bomber to remain invulnerable to the S-500.
93 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Pessimist22
    Pessimist22 10 June 2021 06: 48
    -46%
    Take the example of promises from the Russian press smile
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 10 June 2021 06: 51
      +16
      American press: Soon an aircraft will appear in the US Air Force, for which the S-500 "Prometheus" air defense system will not become a serious problem
      mmm yes ... apparently it will fly very low ... a meter and a half from the surface ... the trouble is right.
      1. For example
        For example 10 June 2021 07: 00
        +5
        Yesterday a similar nonsense was written about our PAK YES.
        Like him ... everything.
        No weapon will take him.

        And my doubt about this statement was simply removed from this site.

        "Writers" defend any nonsense written by them. wink

        Editors apparently died out as a species, if such lies are published here and there.

        Outright lies are covered with words about information war.

        As a result, we live in streams of outright lies.
        1. Shurik70
          Shurik70 10 June 2021 07: 44
          +1
          Sho, AGAIN! ??
          (C)
        2. Login_Off
          Login_Off 10 June 2021 07: 57
          +5
          Took off the tongue.
          Just take and replace the B-21 with the PAK YES, and the S-500 with the promising air defense systems!
          1. For example
            For example 10 June 2021 08: 51
            +6
            Got the downsides? wassat

            They threw hats at you. laughing

            drinks

            Do you remember the anecdote
            - Georgians are better than Armenians!
            - well, what, the better ???
            - than the Armenians! wassat

            Here is the same reaction.
            1. NIKN
              NIKN 10 June 2021 10: 43
              +3
              SAM S-500 B-21 Raider will be able due to the fact that it "has modularity and open architecture
              Will overcome of course ... modules in parcels through AliExpress. :))
            2. Pessimist22
              Pessimist22 10 June 2021 12: 03
              +7
              Greetings! Yeah, they poked it from the heart, but no one gave any arguments, but this is not the main thing, the main thing is that we can speak freely, although as I understand it is being squeezed in this too. Yesterday I watched Bad comedian, Medinsky, the director, wanted a review of the film "Zoya" and to give some more "bream", so that they lose consciousness, these are real traitors.
        3. poquello
          poquello 10 June 2021 12: 01
          0
          Quote: For example
          Yesterday a similar nonsense was written about our PAK YES.
          Like him ... everything.
          No weapon will take him.

          in the article about the Pakda it was described why, such as the protection system, and in general everything is clear and logical - the RB blocks guidance, the RV BB drives away the aircraft cannons, it is not clear only how he will escape from the massive shelling of the Izhisovs, see the block - there, after all, the blanks are flying, the PM dodges or maybe not
          1. For example
            For example 10 June 2021 12: 55
            +3
            Quote: poquello
            RB blocks aiming, RV BB drives away aircraft cannons

            The Jews foaming at the mouth argued that their air defense system tightly closed the country.
            But it turned out that the water pipes are flowing quietly.
            "Missiles of the wrong design" put the bolt on the vaunted system.

            There is no 100 percent protection.

            As popular wisdom says
            - there is a threaded bolt for each nut.

            Shapkozakidatstvo always leads to undesirable consequences.
            1. poquello
              poquello 10 June 2021 12: 58
              0
              Quote: For example
              The Jews, foaming at the mouth, proved

              understandably, the argument is
              1. For example
                For example 10 June 2021 13: 11
                +4
                You write that electronic warfare blocks guidance.
                But this is your faith, nothing more.

                At the moment, there is no electronic warfare system that is capable of preventing ammunition from entering a guarded object with a one hundred percent guarantee.

                And why do you deny the enemy the opportunity to have weapons like ours?

                Underestimating the enemy has always led to defeat.

                Among our people, this behavior is called a hat.

                In your opinion, our plane can repel any attack on it, but the American one cannot. Because he's American.
                1. poquello
                  poquello 10 June 2021 13: 14
                  0
                  Quote: For example
                  You write that electronic warfare blocks guidance.
                  But this is your faith, nothing more.

                  At the moment, there is no electronic warfare system that prevents ammunition from entering a guarded object with a one hundred percent guarantee.

                  There is no 100% guarantee even in the operation of a conventional mine, this is within the margin of error
        4. venik
          venik 10 June 2021 18: 20
          0
          Quote: For example
          Yesterday a similar nonsense was written about our PAK YES.
          Like him ... everything. No weapon will take him. And my doubt about this statement was simply removed from this site.

          ===========
          And they did the right thing! Incidentally, it was written there that the PAK DA will be equipped with an electronic warfare system, which will fight с any weapons.
          Note: "fight" but not "guarantee safety"!
          I remember your comments and I am very glad that you and in this article left a "critical footprint"! ( drinks )!
          So I ran into you wrong! Further:

          ".. Was wrong. I got excited. I promise to improve. I ask you to give the opportunity to redeem!"
          drinks
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. venik
        venik 10 June 2021 12: 02
        +2
        Quote: Dead Day
        mmm yes ... apparently it will fly very low ... a meter and a half from the surface ... the trouble is right.

        =======
        good And if they also release the chassis, they will not even be able to fly but drive !!! And then how can the S-500 detect them ... in the stream of public transport? what lol

        drinks
        1. bang
          bang 11 June 2021 21: 49
          0
          An example of hiding an aircraft in a swarm of drones)
    2. Egoza
      Egoza 10 June 2021 06: 51
      +8
      In this case, you can say "God forbid our calf to devour a wolf!" The press knows everything! It is just that the population urgently needs to be reassured that "everything is under control and the United States is still the strongest" And there will be more and more such statements in the press
      1. Essex62
        Essex62 10 June 2021 08: 36
        0
        And they have a population for a long time and are not worried about the strength or weakness of madness. It decided to surrender to niggas en masse. Bacchanalia of chronic guilt. Shoe shiners are only very alarmed by the lack of clientele. wassat
        1. Prisoner
          Prisoner 10 June 2021 08: 53
          +4
          Let the black shoe polish be changed to white. winked Get rich.
      2. lis-ik
        lis-ik 10 June 2021 12: 11
        0
        Quote: Egoza
        It is just that the population urgently needs to be reassured that "everything is under control and the United States is still the strongest" And there will be more and more such statements in the press

        But at least they have a basis for such statements, but we have one nonsense.
    3. Anachoret
      Anachoret 10 June 2021 08: 38
      +4
      SAM S500 Prometheus is not a problem at all for NATO aircraft ... if they do not fly in the zone of its destruction near our borders))
      1. Romario_Argo
        Romario_Argo 10 June 2021 09: 47
        +1
        strange, the S-500 has a range of 600 km, and an altitude of ~ 200-300 km.,
        as an option to create an orbital TGK of the Progress type with SAM C- ___ (next)
        orbital speed 8 km / sec. it will even be easier to shoot down anything that flies lower or higher
        1. Romario_Argo
          Romario_Argo 10 June 2021 15: 12
          +1
          create an orbital TGK of the Progress type with SAM S- ___ (next)

          and this is the next generation of space technology
          this is no longer a self-defense complex - but there will already be a full-fledged orbital air defense missile system / missile defense
    4. lucul
      lucul 10 June 2021 08: 46
      -2
      Take the example of promises from the Russian press

      What nonsense are you writing. The entire press in Russia to the nonsense of the Western press - as to the moon.
      For example, check it out
      in the American magazine it is indicated that the B-500 Raider will be able to overcome the air defense built using the S-21 air defense system due to the fact that it "has modularity and an open architecture that will allow various engineering solutions to be implemented on its platform."

      That is, it flies towards him from the S-500 missile defense system, and the B-21
      - and I'm all so modular (check out my new pink lacquer on cast chassis wheels), and even with an open architecture.
      - ah-ah shouted in horror our missile defense system and buried her nose in the ground.
      This is how their press (and analysts) envision future meetings.
      As long as they have people in key positions not in terms of qualifications, but in terms of tolerance and belief in the ideals of LGBT people, we can sleep peacefully.
      Yesterday I watched a video on the new Butterfield, where there will be a confrontation between Russia and the United States, there are no words ...
      I want to say that the general level of incompetence in the United States in all areas is unusually high.
      Check it out - how the F-35 pilot jumps out of the cockpit and from the MANPADS knocks down the Su-57 that overtakes him, and falls back into his own plane))
      1. Tatyana Pershina
        Tatyana Pershina 10 June 2021 10: 58
        -2
        "As long as they have people in key positions not in terms of qualifications, but in terms of tolerance and belief in the ideals of LGBT people, we can sleep peacefully."
        I cannot agree with you. When in the mid-90s I was at the computer. planted a newbie and he decided to show independence and then yelled “what did I do !?”, guessing which buttons he pressed, what commands he gave, it was simply impossible, so he could not explain anything. It took a very long time to dig to restore normal work.
        What these incompetent people do and whether it will be possible to fix it is a big question.
      2. Wedmak
        Wedmak 11 June 2021 06: 17
        +1
        how the pilot of the F-35 jumps out of the cockpit and from the MANPADS knocks down the Su-57 that overtakes him, and falls back into his own plane))

        From the RPG, taking it out of nowhere. And after returning to the cockpit, he flies away about his business ... probably standing and without a lantern like a convertible.
        In general, this series of games seems to me to be designed to praise American weapons, regardless of the physics of their action. There are many such shots - two Ka-52s in the city (!) Cannot slam the light AH-6i (or something based on it). The AH-6i itself flies like a dragonfly, with wild accelerations and maneuvers.
        All weapons that are NOT American are bullshit - what are you all about?
    5. Garm
      Garm 10 June 2021 16: 25
      +1
      I wonder why the cons?
      Does our press follow the example of NI?
    6. eklmn
      eklmn 10 June 2021 16: 44
      +1
      From the article:
      In TNI, referring to the words of the head of the American command for global strikes of the air force Timothy Ray, it is said that soon an aircraft will appear in the US Air Force, for which the S-500 Prometheus will not become a serious problem.

      NI has many articles mentioning Timothy Ray, NI has many articles describing the B-21, NI has many articles about the S-500 system, but in NI there is not a single article comparing the B-21 versus the S-500!
      The editorial board, as always, is inflating patriotism out of the blue. It can be seen either prices are rising, or elections are coming ...
  2. denk20
    denk20 10 June 2021 06: 49
    0
    Yugoslavia seems to have shown that the S-200s can be seen and shot down by their planes. So there they were quantitatively lacking.
    1. mvg
      mvg 10 June 2021 09: 16
      +4
      It remains to deliver the S-200 to the south ..
      Didn't you have any lessons for the holidays?
      1. lis-ik
        lis-ik 10 June 2021 12: 13
        0
        Quote: mvg
        It remains to deliver the S-200 to the south ..
        Didn't you have any lessons for the holidays?

        Extracurricular reading is usually given for the summer, so I've read a lot.
        1. mvg
          mvg 10 June 2021 14: 21
          -1
          that's been reading

          Don't believe everything they write. Especially in the Murzilka magazine. The South never had a S-200. A very specific system. In Syria, for example, she showed nothing. Although it has been modernized more than once, for 2014-2020
          PS: On the internet you can find a recommended list of books that should be in the toilet. With the right selection of literature, you can get a very good education. At least you won't draw nonsense on VO.
          1. lis-ik
            lis-ik 10 June 2021 14: 23
            0
            Maxim, I'm not Denis, and in general, I kind of sarcastic. Look more closely at the answers.
  3. Thrifty
    Thrifty 10 June 2021 06: 53
    +5
    For B21, the C400 will be a serious problem, because the C500 is an anti-missile and anti-satellite complex!
  4. Machete
    Machete 10 June 2021 06: 53
    +4
    If only they will fly somewhere beyond the ISS Orbit.
  5. Pravodel
    Pravodel 10 June 2021 06: 54
    +11
    the B-500 Raider will be able to overcome the air defense, built using the S-21 air defense system, due to the fact that it "has modularity and open architecture, which will allow various engineering solutions to be implemented on its platform."

    Here, for sure, either zhurnalyugs or figures from 5-rd have turned something too much. Again, apparently, they are going to cut the loot ... If the modular and open architecture is a condition for overcoming the air defense of the S-500 air defense system, then the locomotive also has an open and modular architecture: hang whatever you want and where you want it. But steam locomotives do not fly and, even more so, do not overcome air defense.
    1. Ren
      Ren 10 June 2021 07: 27
      +6
      Quote: The Truth
      the locomotive also has an open and modular architecture: hang whatever you want and wherever you want. But steam locomotives don't fly

      That's exactly why steam locomotives are capable of overcoming any missile defense / air defense.
      Neither the S-400 nor the S-500 is a hindrance to them (steam locomotives), do you agree? wink
      1. alstr
        alstr 10 June 2021 08: 47
        +1
        Well, let's put it this way. If desired and under certain conditions, you can shoot a steam locomotive from the S-400, but is it necessary?
      2. Pravodel
        Pravodel 10 June 2021 08: 58
        0
        do you agree?

        Absolutely agree!!! Precisely, on a steam locomotive you can run away from any missile defense / air defense system. Even the "patriot" of amers will stand and fade, it will not be possible to cope with the steam locomotive ...
      3. vargo
        vargo 10 June 2021 10: 49
        0
        It turns out a brilliant idea - this is to attach wings to the train and call it B-21))
        Or we don't see it for air defense / missile defense only because it simply won't take off. Well, also an option)
  6. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 10 June 2021 06: 56
    +2
    Soon an aircraft will appear in the US Air Force, for which the S-500 Prometheus will not become a serious problem
    I remember shouting that for the F-35, Russian air defense systems are not terrible, but what is the result? That's when it will soon appear (if it will appear at all), then you can talk about this topic. Well, the Western media are for that and the Western ones, in order to constantly differ and not for the better.
  7. Torins
    Torins 10 June 2021 06: 56
    +4
    Something they connected not connected things. I read it and did not understand anything lol
  8. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 10 June 2021 06: 59
    +8
    In words, the striped ears have won everyone for a long time. Invisible - they are conditionally "invisible" ... It is more correct to write - hardly noticeable in some ranges of radio emission. On the "meter" ranges, an aircraft with any coating and any shape can be seen. So fly, doves of peace ... wassat
  9. krops777
    krops777 10 June 2021 07: 01
    +5
    Soon an aircraft will appear in the US Air Force, for which the S-500 Prometheus air defense system will not become a serious problem


    In 1973, Israeli pilots also thought about the "square" system until they encountered it in reality.
  10. Babay Atasovich
    Babay Atasovich 10 June 2021 07: 01
    -1
    Petrov and Boshirov will not complete it correctly, the Pentagon has clamped down on the money for them. And they work for free only for the Motherland. Don't, don't make your dreams come true. No.
  11. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 10 June 2021 07: 22
    -1
    Let's continue the topic of boasting, for B 21, which has already never taken off, calmly flies over the C 500! According to one of our politicians, there is a development of the C 700. As they say, don't carry bags! hi
    1. mark1
      mark1 10 June 2021 07: 29
      -1
      Quote: tralflot1832
      According to one of our politicians, there is a development of the C 700.

      And only for Turkey, and for us - the C-1700! But this is ts-s-s !!!
  12. Tusv
    Tusv 10 June 2021 07: 34
    +1
    Briefly about the Pentagon's TK for Ryder. Spirit is painfully expensive - 2 lard overboard + modernization * even one lard. Give us a budget version of Spirit. no more than a pollard. And NI on Ryder, at least 4 lard hung
  13. rocket757
    rocket757 10 June 2021 08: 11
    +4
    American press: Soon an aircraft will appear in the US Air Force, for which the S-500 "Prometheus" air defense system will not become a serious problem
    ... You won't try, you won't know.
    1. cniza
      cniza 10 June 2021 08: 38
      +2
      Good time! hi

      So there are already samples of what they will say about the filling of the F-35 and about Yugoslavia and their invisibility ...
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 10 June 2021 08: 47
        +3
        Welcome soldier
        The money will be spent not small, it is necessary, it is necessary, than to justify it .... with the "penguin" it somehow did not go, there will be a new "wunderwolf to praise, maybe it will ride.
        And the scribblers will write and write again what they are told. Nothing new in general.
        1. cniza
          cniza 10 June 2021 08: 55
          +5
          Well, he and the penguin will hiccup for a long time, until only Israel was able, as they say, to reflash it, what will happen to the new one - let the Wishlist embody first ...
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 10 June 2021 10: 20
            +1
            Quote: cniza
            Israel managed, as they say, to reflash it

            Israel has adapted the pepelats to perform specific tasks where it can perform them with sufficient efficiency, because there is no serious opposition at all. They did not show anything else new, the same as with the technology of the previous generation ...
            those. so far nothing really new.
            1. cniza
              cniza 10 June 2021 11: 50
              +2
              So I mean it, it all depends on the tasks, but they adapted - well done ...
              1. rocket757
                rocket757 10 June 2021 11: 55
                +1
                Well, yes, they do not sit on the priest exactly ... they are looking for further ways of development, modernization. This is normal, this is reasonable.
                1. cniza
                  cniza 10 June 2021 12: 01
                  +2
                  And so it turns out that everyone has to finish it for their own tasks, I mean the software ...
                  1. rocket757
                    rocket757 10 June 2021 12: 47
                    +1
                    Well, the flag is between them ... in their hands.
  14. Marachuh
    Marachuh 10 June 2021 08: 23
    +3
    Well, if it remains a project or stands at the airfield, then yes, he will not be afraid of the s500!
  15. DmSol
    DmSol 10 June 2021 08: 30
    0
    You shouldn't have written this. Now Russian-speaking emigrants will tell you about Medvedka 
    Quote: krops777
    Soon an aircraft will appear in the US Air Force, for which the S-500 Prometheus air defense system will not become a serious problem


    In 1973, Israeli pilots also thought about the "square" system until they encountered it in reality.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 10 June 2021 10: 23
      0
      Not a single system, without the proper calculation skills and good training of command personnel, well-thought-out tactics of application, will show all that it can !!!
      Alas and ah, I had to be convinced of this more than once.
  16. cniza
    cniza 10 June 2021 08: 36
    +3

    The main "advantage" of the B-21 Raider over the Russian S-500 complexes, American journalists called its computer "stuffing",


    But what about the F-35 filling, how will you jump over this problem? ...
    1. dzvero
      dzvero 10 June 2021 09: 22
      +2
      Alternatively, Indian programmers will not be allowed to take a cannon shot. But I am hesitating ... my own is expensive, the Chinese are still those entertainers, the Russians - it is better to close the program right away ... so they will repeat the rake run smile
      1. cniza
        cniza 10 June 2021 09: 33
        +3
        These are their problems, let them spin as they want. yes
  17. aszzz888
    aszzz888 10 June 2021 08: 37
    +2
    Supposedly this will allow the strategic bomber to remain invulnerable to the S-500.
    The keyword was highlighted. If only the grandmother would have been .... and so on. laughing
  18. AshPoseidon
    AshPoseidon 10 June 2021 08: 44
    0
    Who knows how the S-500 and B-21 will behave. Our supreme asked to take into account the appearance of weapons based on new physical principles in a number of countries.
  19. Prisoner
    Prisoner 10 June 2021 08: 56
    0
    Whether or not it is a dark matter, but it is necessary to crow. Although there is a variant of such a device for which the S-500 is not very scary. True, it requires some work. The propeller must be removed. You never know.
  20. Evgeny I.
    Evgeny I. 10 June 2021 08: 56
    0
    The final episode from "under siege 2." Where the bad guy in the laptop and the satellite phone says: "kirdyk to the Pentagon." And then Sigal from the pestle straight into the beech bang bang. All, end of sabotage. I sped a cool computer in front of a regular bullet.
  21. U-58
    U-58 10 June 2021 08: 57
    +2
    Well, the stump is clear that the time will come when the S-500 will become obsolete. It will be replaced by some kind of C600, 700, etc.
    And this will always happen as long as aviation and air defense exist.
    The normal course of life, so to speak
  22. Max PV
    Max PV 10 June 2021 09: 01
    +3
    No, if the promising V-21 does not enter the S-500's coverage area, but, for example, launches cruise missiles from a distance of a thousand kilometers or more, then the S-500 will not reach it. The trick is that the CD can also launch the "old man" B-52.
    But I can hardly imagine what relation modularity and speed of data processing have to the capabilities of an air defense breakthrough. More precisely, I can’t imagine. Especially "modularity".
    1. dzvero
      dzvero 10 June 2021 15: 37
      0
      More precisely, I can’t imagine. Especially "modularity".

      For example, the S-500 strikes the "module of the left wing half" - the "module" is unfastened - the B-21 flies further to break through the air defense system ... and so on until all the "modules" are used up smile
  23. APASUS
    APASUS 10 June 2021 09: 07
    0
    It should be written like this. Does the B-21 Raider module allow you to not be afraid of the S-500 air defense system? So maybe now in general the air defense needs to be cut, the Americans again have something
  24. mvg
    mvg 10 June 2021 09: 36
    +1
    Can I enter a dress code on VO? Well, there by age, plus a couple of intellectual tests and a couple of questions about history. And delimit access rights to sections.
    Some sort of filter by author. I do not want (if I pass the test) to read Polonsky, Ryabov ... this is a time conversion with zero result. I miss Kaptsov, not the worst option
  25. Lew
    Lew 10 June 2021 09: 40
    0
    it's good that soon ...
  26. nerd.su
    nerd.su 10 June 2021 09: 45
    0
    The main "advantage" of the B-21 Raider over the Russian S-500 complexes, American journalists called its computer "stuffing", which is capable of "processing large amounts of data in the shortest possible time." Allegedly, this will allow the strategic bomber to remain invulnerable to the S-500.

    Modern American botanists are capable of processing large amounts of data in the shortest possible time and this will allow them to remain invulnerable to the kulaks of Russian hooligans.
    Blessed is he who believes ...
  27. CastroRuiz
    CastroRuiz 10 June 2021 10: 03
    +1
    Such "analysis", idiot chatter.
  28. Woland
    Woland 10 June 2021 10: 33
    0
    It's funny. Soon is when? In 30 years? They step on the same rake, they think that once the money has been allocated, the issue has been resolved! Guys, money only HELPS, and it's BRAINS that decide. But this is not so simple.
  29. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 10 June 2021 10: 34
    0
    Does B21 have any sharp advantages in STEALTH over B-2?
  30. DmSol
    DmSol 10 June 2021 10: 39
    0
    It goes without saying. But with the advent of new weapons, effective tactics of use do not appear immediately. And if during the Medvedka the Jews managed to "crawl through the hole in the fence", then the second time it will not work like this with a comparable enemy. To answer the question of a good plane or not, one must first of all understand the tasks assigned to it.
    Quote: rocket757
    Not a single system, without the proper calculation skills and good training of command personnel, well-thought-out tactics of application, will show all that it can !!!
    Alas and ah, I had to be convinced of this more than once.
  31. Abrosimov Sergey Olegovich
    Abrosimov Sergey Olegovich 10 June 2021 13: 12
    0
    Quote: Dead Day
    American press: Soon an aircraft will appear in the US Air Force, for which the S-500 "Prometheus" air defense system will not become a serious problem
    mmm yes ... apparently it will fly very low ... a meter and a half from the surface ... the trouble is right.


    I'll try to guess: is it really an ekranoplan ??? belay
  32. Antokha
    Antokha 10 June 2021 13: 50
    0
    When the Americans were really sure that we would not get them, they flew directly over the territory of the USSR. Well, let them launch their B21, but the result will most likely be the same as last time.
  33. Vadim F
    Vadim F 10 June 2021 14: 48
    0
    clowns ... why is a strategic bomber even needed in the 21st century? With the same money, you can build a dozen drones with a strategic range and flight duration, from which the benefits will be 100 times greater.
    zs I do not believe that the Americans will do them ... just information noise.
  34. Vlad Pervovich
    Vlad Pervovich 10 June 2021 14: 53
    0

    Such .....? )
  35. meandr51
    meandr51 10 June 2021 16: 10
    0
    We have heard all this, starting with the F-117 ... But the budget needs to be cut!
  36. AC130 Ganship
    AC130 Ganship 10 June 2021 17: 31
    0
    God forbid that someone tried to shoot from the C500 to B21. Nobody needs war. Remember the Cold War remake starring George Clooney as the commander of the strategist who overcame the USSR's air defense?
    1. kot423
      kot423 10 June 2021 22: 02
      0
      Quote: AC130 Ganship
      God forbid that someone tried to shoot from C500 to B21

      Don't juggle. Not Ros. The media puffed up their cheeks that the C500 would go for a breakthrough and he did not care about the herd of B21, who stood in front of him with their breasts, but exactly the opposite. So, write your inventions in the same vein as above - write to NI, or better to the pentagon and the can.
      Py.Sy. In extreme cases, you can write to the sport lotto.
  37. Konstantin Sokov
    Konstantin Sokov 10 June 2021 20: 24
    0
    He will not fly, but like a subway - underground
  38. Nord11
    Nord11 10 June 2021 21: 42
    -1
    Well, if he flies low-low, and sneaks in vegetable gardens and behind barns in dangerous areas, then yes, there will be no escape from him. Katz offers to surrender ..
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 11 June 2021 06: 22
      0
      Well, if he flies low, low

      We'll have to stop at traffic lights, otherwise the traffic police will accept it.
  39. Alexander Panteleev
    Alexander Panteleev 10 June 2021 22: 28
    +1
    fly pigeons fly ... and we will trim your wings ...
    (three musketeers. Dumas.)
  40. Wedmak
    Wedmak 11 June 2021 06: 07
    0
    The main "advantage" of the B-21 Raider over the Russian S-500 complexes, American journalists called its computer "stuffing", which is capable of "processing large amounts of data in the shortest possible time."

    How interesting will the processing of large amounts of information from a rocket flying at you help? Show her cartoons? Or project a filthy picture onto the clouds?
  41. Vdi73
    Vdi73 11 June 2021 10: 12
    0
    The new S-300 will be problematic, not to mention the S-400,500. Show-off.
  42. Vedmak646
    Vedmak646 11 June 2021 12: 15
    0
    SDI - 2 (for the administration of the site I explain: SDI is Reagan's defense initiative to organize war in space)
  43. isv000
    isv000 11 June 2021 23: 05
    0
    Soon an aircraft will appear in the US Air Force, for which the S-500 Prometheus air defense system will not become a serious problem

    Powers thought the same thing to "slip through" ... in the dense layers of the atmosphere ... fool