Tactical and technical characteristics of C-400 "Triumph" were confirmed during firing at the Ashuluk training ground

About 40 units the military equipment of the Aerospace Defense Forces (WKO), who took part in tactical exercises at the Ashuluk training ground in the Astrakhan Region, arrived at a permanent station in the vicinity of Dmitrov near Moscow.

According to the Office of the Press Service and Information of the Defense Ministry of the Russian Federation, during tactical exercises, combat crews of the latest C-400 “Triumph” anti-aircraft missile regiment of the EKR Troops carried out night combat shooting from a traveling position and specially equipped positioning area. Were successfully hit target missiles such as "Pishchal", "Bekas" and others that imitate the ballistic and winged targets of the conditional enemy.

In total, around July and August, around 800 servicemen of EKR Troops took part in tactical exercises at the Ashuluk training ground. In the course of the exercise, the subunit of the air defense units conducted live firing from the Z-300 Favorit, Triumph C-400, Triumph anti-aircraft missile and gun systems Pantsir-S and with high accuracy hit 50 conventional air targets, more than 20 missiles targets like "Pischal", "Swift" and other targets that simulate high-altitude, low-altitude and ballistic targets in the entire range of altitudes and speeds.

In order to create conditions as close as possible to the combat, during the exercises, the command of the VKO armies modeled the combat situation at various levels of complexity with simulating the use of a conditional adversary of the entire complex of aerospace attack weapons.

Comments

[ward]

Well, that’s very good news ... the armor is strong and our tanks are fast ... plus .. and the missiles fly and fall ... and sits somewhere across the ocean at the table, graying a gray-haired general with his hands in his hands ... and whispering the fact ... fak u ...

[Serg_Y]

I hope the teachings were held objectively, and it’s not you who attack, but you destroy everyone.

[andrei332809]

this is good, since our targets usually exceed the characteristics of the armaments of the now unlikely enemy

[101]

The news is good from all sides. It encourages those who doubt and reassures those who hope that they can bark at us with impunity from a position of strength.

[hanik]

The only thing that depresses is that these target missiles have low speeds of about 1200 km / h, I would like to test the S-400 on missiles that fly at high speeds of about 3,5 max

[ward]

Well, I don’t know much about aviation ... but somewhere I heard that using supersonic weapons is still a problem ... so when approaching the area of ​​military use ... airplanes slow down ... plus ...

[Bismark]

At a speed of 3.5 max, a missile can be shot down even more than 1200, due to the very high missile speed (3.5), it is possible to calculate its approximate trajectory, that is, to detect, capture and track the target before entering the zone of its destruction. Maneuverability at such a speed is impossible, since it will fall apart at the first turn. Somehow like this.

[zatar]

Good machine, just against the democratizers.

[hanik]

In my opinion, planes need to be shot down before approaching the area of ​​combat use (it may be too late), since the aircraft may already be out of range of the S-400

[afire]

Respect! Put all the hamsters on these targets and test :)

[gregor6549]

There is one "but".
At the beginning of the 90x, a pair of Russian C300 PMU kits went through very independent Minsk straight to the strongly United States.
Considering the fact that С300 and С400 systems do not differ much in composition, architecture, principles of operation, etc. of the main components i.e. Radar review, sector radar, KP, SAM and so on, we can assume that there is already an antidote for C400. Moreover, given the fact that the exercises are still very different from the actual combat situation i.e. when the adversary uses the entire range of active and passive interference and active means of suppressing air defense systems available to him, indulging in unnecessary illusions is fraught.
Yes, the C400 is a strong thing, no words, but ..... there is no reception against scrap, if there is no other scrap. And today there are more than enough of them, other crowbars. And count on the fact that the gray-haired general in the uniform of the US Armed Forces will manage with one word "f ... k", by the way, the most widespread and universal in English. language is naivety from which, as well as from innocence, you need to get rid of in time.

[viruskvartirus]

Not quite so S-400 ANOTHER complex it has a new long-range missile 40N6E, it has passed tests ... "indulge in unnecessary illusions is fraught with" - "Morpheus" here is the answer for you "a highly automated complex for mass shooting of WTO at the close range" and they say money for it they will not regret a bunch of S-400/500 - Vityaz - Morpheus. plus a multifunctional radar complex 55Zh6ME was recently demonstrated and there is still competition Pantsyr-Tor here is a good forum http://forums.airbase.ru/viewforum.php?id=24&p=2

[fidelcastro]

at the beginning of 90 s300 are very different from 400 s2012

[gregor6549]

There are, of course, differences, and it would be strange if they did not exist, but it is difficult to call them fundamental. Yes, some of the performance characteristics of the complexes have improved, but in general it is still the same Efremovsky C300. And the air defense system radar complex was already "multifunctional" then. those. there is no need to replace the technical essence with verbiage and holy faith in another "wunderwaffe".
Again, you can "demonstrate" anything and with any results. He himself participated in such "shows". But if you look at the essence, then nothing particularly new is observed there, and with a good knowledge of the C300 (and they are more than detailed with the adversary), it will not be difficult for specialists to roll over this knowledge to the C400 / 500 and find a council on them. And if the new complexes are delivered to Iranian and other "friends", then the Americans and their comrades will gladly work out the tactics and techniques of countering these complexes. And the fact that during the development a dozen other pilots will die, then who worried about such trifles and when?

[suharev-52]

Well, as always - a fly in the ointment. Although there is some truth in this. It is necessary to keep all the most modern and not to sell them abroad. And then we, as soon as it appears that something new, has not yet arrived in its troops. Like some gentlemen with and without stripes, with their pants up, they rush in search of buyers and joyfully report on the contracts concluded. Sincerely.

[Zomanus]

Okay, "shooters" showed. And what about the "peepers"? Do we have a lot of AWACS and electronic warfare aircraft? After all, in fact, launchers and missiles are bullshit if our guidance systems are jammed or limited by the radio horizon. And for some reason they always show launchers, although without a guidance and target designation complex, these are just New Year's crackers.

[dojjdik]

tactical and technical characteristics of the complex: operating wavelength range - m, cm, dm; number of measured coordinates - 3; detection zone: - in range - 600 km; - in elevation - 70 degrees; - in height - 200 km; number of tracks followed - 200; time of crushing (coagulation) - 15 minutes; average time between failures - 1000 hours.
... Here is a "peep" - current for Iran and even more so for Syria will not work that the mobile is good, but the capture of 600 km and then "lead" the target in vain until it is hit by a torus or beech?