Military Review

The United States named the reason that prevents Russia and China from being "defeated"

77

The United States has established the reason why they still cannot "defeat and defeat" Russia or China. According to the American political scientist and publicist Robert Kaplan, this is hindered by an internal split.


The American political scientist came to the conclusion that the internal political split does not allow the United States to take the lost position of the world leader and "defeat" Russia and China, "violating human rights." Democrats and Republicans have diverged their views so far that the solution of internal problems and the struggle for power are placed above the national interests of the United States, although they are constantly being declared.

Until the two parties reconcile and restore political unity, America will not regain the leadership position it held during the Cold War, which allowed it to win a "triumphant" victory over the "Soviet empire." At the same time, Washington has managed to use human rights concerns as a foreign policy tool.

Until US foreign policy manages to reconcile realism with the protection of human rights, America will not have a convincing concept of global leadership that can outperform China and Russia.

- says the American political scientist.

At the same time, Kaplan acknowledges that "protecting" human rights in other countries gives the United States leverage in foreign policy influence on them. By uniting the political field and using the protection of "democratic values" around the world, the United States will regain global world leadership, he sums up.
77 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Civil
    Civil 2 June 2021 08: 33
    +28
    The United States has established the reason why they still cannot "defeat and defeat" Russia or China.

    I can easily give a reason and even give a name: Generalissimo Comrade Stalin, who left both Russia and China atomic weapons. Without it, they could be torn to shreds.
    1. Woodman
      Woodman 2 June 2021 08: 44
      +14
      Quote: Civil
      who left both Russia and China atomic weapons

      It did not save the Union ... Apparently, besides the vigorous loaf, there is something else.
      1. Olgovich
        Olgovich 2 June 2021 08: 52
        +22
        Quote: Lesovik
        Apparently, besides the vigorous loaf, there is something else.

        The day before yesterday, the US Secretary of Defense said something very specific about this:

        "the reception of the US Army of the TRANSGENDERS makes it INVINCIBLE
        yes
        such is the army of fighting races good

        With regard to human rights, I demand liberation political prisoners in the USA- peaceful demonstrators thrown into prison at the Capitol and extrajudicial prisoners of the US Guantanamo torture chambers and secret prisons. am
        1. Doctor
          Doctor 2 June 2021 09: 01
          +23
          "the reception of the US Army of the TRANSGENDERS makes it INVINCIBLE
          such is the army of fighting races good

          In topic:
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana 2 June 2021 09: 31
            +8
            Kaplan acknowledges that "protecting" human rights in other countries gives the United States leverage over foreign policy.

            Well, at least the "protection of human rights and freedoms" around the world, the American Kaplan finally recognized as an instrument of American foreign policy influence and told the truth about it!

            And then after all there was an opinion in the so-called. "countries of democracies" all over the world, that US politicians are supposedly just "Holy" people - "pious missionaries" who disinterestedly care only for the national well-being of other countries. But in reality they are just ordinary LIBERAL Fascists!

            REFERENCE
            Liberalism and Fascism are two sides of the same coin. Namely.
            The term "liberal fascism" appeared in the book of the same name by American political scientist Jonah Goldberg in 2008 and has already become firmly established in the political lexicon. ...
            LIBERALISM - a theory that rejects the need for state intervention in the economic life of society and preaches the freedom of personal initiative of economic entities. The initial basis of liberalism is three postulates: private property, free enterprise and free competition.
            A "natural liberal person" is a person whose behavior is subject to the principle of MAXIMUM OWN PROFIT.
            In other words, LIBERALISM is the ideology of the market-capitalist civilization, which is based on the myth of the "free market".
            FASCISM - this is not a supra-class power and not the power of the petty bourgeoisie or the lumpen proletariat over finance capital.
            Fascism is the power of the FINANCIAL capital itself. And above all, the bankers of the US Federal Reserve.
            1. Hagen
              Hagen 2 June 2021 12: 23
              +1
              Quote: Tatiana
              The term "liberal fascism" appeared in the book of the same name by American political scientist Jonah Goldberg in 2008 and has already become firmly established in the political lexicon.

              I do not want to defend either extreme liberalism or fascism. However, I note that political scientists do not always use precise definitions in their expressions, but often admit figurative expressions that are more reminiscent of an oxymoron. Sometimes just to be remembered by readers or listeners. I tend to use classical definitions more. Because only in this case, communicating with each other, we can equally understand the essence of what is being discussed. Otherwise, I agree with you. Whenever the United States raises questions of human rights protection in some foreign country, expect that there they will inflate some kind of conflict in order to their own primitive enrichment. Human rights and democracy themselves are nothing more than an instrument for destroying someone else's sovereignty.
              1. Tatyana
                Tatyana 2 June 2021 14: 56
                +8
                Quote: Hagen
                I tend to use classical definitions more. Because only in this case, communicating with each other, we can equally understand the essence of what is being discussed. Otherwise, I agree with you. Whenever the United States raises questions of human rights protection in some foreign country, expect that there they will inflate some kind of conflict in order to their own primitive enrichment. Human rights and democracy themselves are nothing more than an instrument for destroying someone else's sovereignty.


                1. Hagen
                  Hagen 2 June 2021 15: 54
                  +1
                  It should be admitted that even under Soviet rule the government was not appointed by the people at all. We only wondered how people like K.U. Chernenko appeared at the helm, and wondered which of the "persons from the Mausoleum" would take the highest place after the next "nationwide funeral." So under socialism with democracy, in the Stalinist concept of democracy, it was, frankly, tense. We elected to the Congress of People's Deputies, so to speak laughing , some, and were led by completely different ones. request
            2. nickname7
              nickname7 3 June 2021 05: 50
              +3
              American Kaplan finally recognized the protection of human rights and freedoms "of a person throughout the world as an instrument of American foreign policy influence

              The very concept of law, the British manifested itself, during the seizure of colonies, when it was necessary to distinguish a white man from a Papuan, it turned out that a subject of the crown had rights, and the Papuan was equal to an animal in terms of provas.
          2. Glory1974
            Glory1974 2 June 2021 10: 26
            -11%
            Something I have not seen on TV a single video about the Russian army. Are they only shown in the USA?
            1. Alex777
              Alex777 2 June 2021 11: 33
              +9
              Change the music channel. wink
              1. Glory1974
                Glory1974 2 June 2021 12: 20
                -3
                Change the music channel.

                I don't watch TV, I listen to the radio in the car. If you can tell me on which channel such patriotic videos are shown, I would be grateful wassat
                1. Alex777
                  Alex777 2 June 2021 12: 54
                  +2
                  If you can tell me on which channel such patriotic videos are shown, I would be grateful wassat

                  Set a difficult task. wink
                  At least you need to know what channels do you have?
                  In the news and just when switching programs, I often find myself on military topics. hi
                  1. Glory1974
                    Glory1974 2 June 2021 15: 38
                    0
                    there are a lot of channels, there is nothing to watch. often the same films are shown on different channels.
                    But I was talking about patriotic videos about the army. There is a lot of talk and show on military topics, but where have you seen a video similar to the one in the article?
                2. Rostislav Prokopenko
                  Rostislav Prokopenko 2 June 2021 20: 40
                  +3
                  TK Zvezda is a very good channel bully
              2. Vladimir Mashkov
                Vladimir Mashkov 2 June 2021 13: 26
                0
                You read this "American political scientist and publicist Robert Kaplan" and you think: is he a deceitful propagandist-provocateur or just arrogant D.U.rak? Zadornov would say the latter. I believe that - judging by the surname - the first thing, and by cunning on American suckers, he simply earns loot.
                1. nickname7
                  nickname7 3 June 2021 05: 57
                  +2
                  They have minority rights first, politicians are earning points and the promotion of lesbians has gradually entered the army. Some drew on the insanity of the situation arising from the indulgence of minorities, the company of soldiers of Lizbians reeks of idiocy.
          3. keeper03
            keeper03 2 June 2021 11: 48
            +2
            Let them continue along this road and do not climb to us !!! yes good soldier
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Bolt cutter
          Bolt cutter 2 June 2021 14: 17
          +2
          such is the army of fighting races
          Those who wish will not surrender to them yes
      2. Civil
        Civil 2 June 2021 09: 03
        -5
        Quote: Lesovik
        It did not save the Union ... Apparently, besides the vigorous loaf, there is something else.

        Yes, there is - a weak-willed population. The effeminate khataskrains.
      3. RealPilot
        RealPilot 2 June 2021 13: 28
        +1
        They will not wait! tongue
        To defeat both Russia and China, and even defeat them ...

        It is not enough to consolidate the two parties, because in this respect they are already monolithic! And human rights in American foreign policy are just a farce.
        As an asymmetric response, they can recruit more transgender people into the military, to saturate with "strong role models", as was recently announced in a propaganda video for recruiting into the American army!
      4. akarfoxhound
        akarfoxhound 2 June 2021 15: 48
        +1
        Your traitors are at the helm and no "loaf" will save
      5. And Us Rat
        And Us Rat 2 June 2021 19: 46
        0
        Quote: Lesovik
        It did not save the Union ... Apparently, besides the vigorous loaf, there is something else.

        Of course there is, and this is trivial for anyone who knows how to think and understands a little in sociology, the psychology of the individual's relationship with society and anthropology.
        Any ideology that runs counter to human nature - dies off without compulsory support.
        Moreover, the devil is always in the little things, sociolism had a chance to replace Orthodoxy, for example, by becoming a new religion, but the creators were amateurs in understanding the nuances of human nature, and it seemed like the propaganda was literate, and brainwashing was put on stream from the cradle, but they could not find points of hold on the human gut. Therefore, everything collapsed as soon as the slack was given. It was necessary to learn from religion, and not to fight with it, imagining oneself smarter than a system perfected for millennia.
        And the fact that there is discord in the states was obviously predictable (for the thinking) at the time of the collapse of the USSR. request
        When a strong flock does not have an equal in strength, consolidating external enemy, the flock breaks up into warring camps, because a competitive struggle is needed for healthy evolution and renewal of blood.
        Another couple of decades as an indisputable superpower, and a civil war with the subsequent disintegration into two camps is guaranteed to them, and maybe even earlier.
    2. Terenin
      Terenin 2 June 2021 08: 47
      +5
      According to the American political scientist and publicist Robert Kaplan, this is hindered by an internal split.

      Robik, you are looking for the cause of the split in the wrong place No.
      Do you want to convey ardent greetings to the "world leader" from migrants, blacks and Latinos !? winked
      These guys get closer to your inner split yes
    3. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 2 June 2021 09: 05
      0
      Stalin did not help the PRC with the creation of nuclear weapons. The Chinese to a large extent created it on their own, partly using the experience of cooperation with the USSR in the mid-to-late 50s, that is, the times of Malenkov and the first stage of Khrushchev's rule.
      1. Civil
        Civil 2 June 2021 09: 11
        -3
        Quote: Sergej1972
        Stalin did not help the PRC with the creation of nuclear weapons. The Chinese to a large extent created it on their own, partly using the experience of cooperation with the USSR in the mid-to-late 50s, that is, the times of Malenkov and the first stage of Khrushchev's rule.

        Yes, yes ... Khrushchev organized the Soviet atomic project? The Chinese built all the objects themselves and handed over the product samples to themselves ...
        1. Sergej1972
          Sergej1972 2 June 2021 09: 18
          +1
          It was under Khrushchev that cooperation between the two countries in this area began. Have you heard about the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna? Chinese specialists also trained there, until relations between the USSR and the PRC deteriorated. And all objects in this area on the territory of the PRC were built precisely during Khrushchev's time. But this was in the sphere of precisely the peaceful atom. Both Stalin and Khrushchev refused to transfer the technologies for creating nuclear weapons to the PRC. Listen, there are many publications on this topic. Read the respected historian Galenovich and other authors.
    4. Roman070280
      Roman070280 2 June 2021 09: 12
      -10%
      I can easily give a reason and even give a name: Generalissimo Comrade Stalin, who left both Russia and China atomic weapons. Without it, they could be torn to shreds.


      The United States "defeated" the Soviet Union even if we had atomic weapons.
      1. Lech from Android.
        Lech from Android. 2 June 2021 09: 31
        +11
        The USA did not smash the USSR ... all this is a fairy tale.
        The betrayal of the two highest officials of the USSR, Gorbachev and Yeltsin, who surrendered to the Americans everything they could and led to the greatest tragedy of the 20th century.
        1. Roman070280
          Roman070280 2 June 2021 11: 01
          -6
          Not smashed USA

          passed to the Americans


          I just didn’t know that Americans do not live in the USA ..))

          USA "defeated"
    5. Starover_Z
      Starover_Z 2 June 2021 09: 16
      +3
      does not allow the United States to take the lost position of world leader and "defeat" Russia and China, "violating human rights"

      They mean rights American person in the world? Which one exactly? Indigenous Indians, imported slaves? Or current LGBT party members?
    6. nickname7
      nickname7 3 June 2021 06: 32
      0
      About human rights. A complex society so that there is no anarchy should be regulated, under socialism where everyone is equal, the emphasis was on administrative bureaucratic methods of regulation, for example, registration, the prohibition of parasitism.
      Under capitalism, society is regulated by economic coercion, you don't want to work, live under a bridge, you can earn a lot of money, you can live in a prestigious area, you don't need a residence permit, money replaces it. And money depends on the person himself, and not on the official. To depend on oneself is psychologically more comfortable than to depend on the will of bureaucrats.
      Regulation in the social system does not mean worse than the cap of the system, they are simply arranged differently. But US analysts apparently figured out this difference and made it their weapon for the disintegration of the country of the Soviets.
    7. TermNachTer
      TermNachTer 6 June 2021 16: 31
      0
      There is no unity even within the parties themselves. There were Republicans who voted against Trump. Plus flirting with unemployed blacks, LGBT people and other minorities. The general mess in the country. Normal whites flee New York.
  2. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 2 June 2021 08: 38
    +10
    So the Democrats have already seized power ... by mail. What is hindering it again?
    1. Far B
      Far B 2 June 2021 08: 45
      +4
      What is hindering it again?
      Round such (relatively), dangle between the legs, ring. Bad dancers always complain about them.
    2. Alex777
      Alex777 2 June 2021 11: 42
      +1
      Trump to Democrats / Globalists destroyed the TTIP, and the TPP. They still whine. bully
      But they will not be able to reconcile. Such deep contradictions.
      The globalists want, but the isolationists do not want to put an "owl on the globe".
  3. askort154
    askort154 2 June 2021 08: 39
    +9
    After the last elections, the United States has convincingly demonstrated what "democracy and human rights protection" is.
    Now it remains to rely only on the strength of arms But definitely, their military "Bolivar can no longer bear two" - Russia and China, and the Anglo-Saxons will try to drive a wedge between Russia and China, as they already did in the 60s of the 20th century.
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 2 June 2021 11: 45
      0
      The states will not climb alone, they will pull Europe under them. They are already doing it. hi
      1. militarist63
        militarist63 4 June 2021 01: 27
        0
        Duc, they, at one time (in the 50s), what a crowd from Europe pulled (and not only from Europe) to Korea! So what? wink
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 4 June 2021 05: 24
          +1
          what a crowd from Europe pulled (and not only from Europe) to Korea! So what?

          Like what? Glory to Kozhedub and the rest of the heroes! wink
          1. militarist63
            militarist63 7 June 2021 00: 46
            +1
            Glory!!! Urrrah! good soldier soldier soldier
  4. Ramadan
    Ramadan 2 June 2021 08: 45
    +3
    Plain populist chatter for American readers.
  5. boris epstein
    boris epstein 2 June 2021 08: 47
    +3
    "Until US foreign policy manages to reconcile realism with the protection of human rights, America will not have a convincing concept of global leadership that can outperform China and Russia."
    And realism in the United States is very strained. The crown presses the head
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. HAM
    HAM 2 June 2021 08: 56
    +2
    Self-confident (bad people). The whole world must adapt to them ... the descendants of robbers, bandits and slaves teach the whole World to live ... not accepting the history of mankind, they do not understand that this has already happened more than once ... and where is now all these "exceptional".? In any case, their "democracy" and "tolerance" will end badly .... just how "bad" is the question ... unfortunately this "bad" will hit the rest of the world ...
  8. Yrec
    Yrec 2 June 2021 08: 56
    0
    Cool. But this "political scientist" also receives money for such nonsense, and not small ones. The more such "political scientists", "experts" and other incompetent inadequacies in the mattressland, the better. Still, we would get rid of our own people, in general it would be chocolate (and marmalade).
  9. Cron
    Cron 2 June 2021 09: 00
    +1
    Until US foreign policy is able to reconcile realism with the protection of human rights, says the American political scientist.

    Does the political scientist want to say that routine statements about the protection of human rights are aimed at protecting human rights, and are not just a tool for promoting their interests?
  10. K-50
    K-50 2 June 2021 09: 04
    +1
    The United States has established the reason why they still cannot "defeat and defeat" Russia

    You can shout about this for a long time and invent all sorts of x-rage, but everything is easier, you just want to live! fellow lol
  11. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 2 June 2021 09: 04
    +2
    Russia cannot be defeated because of its ICBM and large
    territory. This is not new.

    China cannot be defeated due to its powerful economy,
    large population and a large navy.
    1. DIM (a)
      DIM (a) 2 June 2021 11: 32
      +2
      I am more worried about asking the question that it is necessary to THROUGH someone out ... belay
      1. Gado
        Gado 2 June 2021 13: 38
        0
        They are so used to reasoning. If the "enemies" do not give up on good, then they go to war - economic, sanctions, political. And ultimately a real war to exterminate the disaffected. That's the whole story about their understanding of the rest of the world.
  12. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 2 June 2021 09: 05
    0
    The reason is Stalin Joseph Vissarionovich. Plus the Russian character, it was not possible to split into small principalities. The power structures came to their senses in time. The understanding came that those who want to fall under the Western "democracy", in violation of Russian legislation, must be deprived of the "tribune" by any means. And so we will win!
  13. Yaro Polk
    Yaro Polk 2 June 2021 09: 11
    +2
    Nasty geeks talk about war every single day, and who is the aggressor?
    You will fall through the Earth, and peace and tranquility will come in the World.
  14. prior
    prior 2 June 2021 09: 13
    0
    "Human rights", "democratic values" and "US global leadership" are remnants of the past, the past twentieth century.
    In the twenty-first century, the values ​​are different - a certificate of vaccination against Covid and "loot" ... No.
  15. Slon_on
    Slon_on 2 June 2021 09: 14
    +2
    The fact that the elephants and donkeys are locked tightly is good. In fact, they are trite to be afraid.
  16. v.tochenn
    v.tochenn 2 June 2021 09: 15
    0
    According to the American political scientist and publicist Robert Kaplan, this is hindered by an internal split.- An optimist, motherfucker grows laughing
  17. Alexander Kopychev
    Alexander Kopychev 2 June 2021 09: 16
    +4
    At the same time, Washington has been able to use human rights concerns as a foreign policy tool.

    Better lick BLM boots - here they are your Rights ...
  18. shinobi
    shinobi 2 June 2021 09: 19
    +1
    “There is nothing to blame on the mirror, if the face is crooked!” - popular wisdom. A political scientist should pull his head out of the anus and look at his beloved USA without rosy illusions.
  19. cniza
    cniza 2 June 2021 09: 21
    +3
    America will not regain the leadership position it held during the Cold War that allowed it to win a "triumphant" victory over the "empire of the Soviet Union."


    No, we are the Soviet Union ourselves, with our own hands, do not flatter yourself ...
  20. DmSol
    DmSol 2 June 2021 09: 26
    0
    After some time, American propaganda makes the states a winner in one snout not only in World War II, but also over the Soviet Union.
  21. Alex66
    Alex66 2 June 2021 09: 30
    -2
    If the United States won the Cold War against the USSR (thanks to Gorbachev and Yeltsin and their accomplices), then it is not a problem to cope with Russia using the same methods. We have a lot of pain points that we can press.
  22. Sergey Kulikov_3
    Sergey Kulikov_3 2 June 2021 10: 08
    0
    The US defends human rights so fiercely that nothing is left of human rights.
  23. APASUS
    APASUS 2 June 2021 10: 40
    0
    A set of regular American Wishlist!
    As for Russia and China, in this issue there is an amazing cohesion of the establishment, America is above all!
    As far as the violation of human rights is concerned, it is better for the Americans not to raise this issue at all, after they began to press their president, after they established human rights laws in Libya and Iraq.
  24. aszzz888
    aszzz888 2 June 2021 10: 44
    0
    American political scientist ... In the United States, they named the reason that does not allow Russia and China to be "defeated"
    No, well, damn it as simple as laundry soap! And nothing will come back? Or as unnecessary - and we are for scho !? laughing
  25. venik
    venik 2 June 2021 10: 46
    0
    ".... Kaplan acknowledges that" protecting "human rights in other countries gives the United States leverage in foreign policy influence on them. By uniting the political field and using the protection of" democratic values ​​"around the world, the United States will regain global world leadership. ... .. "
    ========
    How many "bla-bla-bla" !!! And all just for the sake of "blurring" banal imperial ambitions!
  26. faterdom
    faterdom 2 June 2021 11: 32
    +1
    America will not regain the leadership position it held during the Cold War that allowed it to win a "triumphant" victory over the "empire of the Soviet Union."

    They built a myth for themselves, and then believed in it, making an axiom.
    If Gorbachev is an American, then yes. After all, it was he who, in the five years of his reign, in the presence of a rigid vertical of power, was able to defeat the USSR.
    And the Americans spent another three years delving into the situation that had arisen, and Yeltsin and his gang helped them finish off the USSR, and Russia too.
    Such a gift was, of course, into the hands of the Americans, but at the same time it was unexpected for them.
    Only now there was not a second that we could not destroy the United States, but not thanks to our wise rulers, but even in spite of them.
    Therefore, when current American politicians are shedding false tears that they, they say, did not destroy Russia in the 90s, like they regretted, they are lying - they could not.
    Even after Yeltsin's drunken speech that now nuclear missiles are not aimed at the United States - who could be sure of that? Well, except for himself?
    1. Tektor
      Tektor 2 June 2021 12: 06
      +1
      Well, it should be noted that Khrushchev was the first to give up the slack, who considered the Union weaker than NATO, and from this position he entered into agreements. And when Gorbachev arrived, it turned out that, according to the 1972 ABM Treaty, we have the right to deploy no more than 100 interceptors, and at the same time, the states deployed 104 Pershing-2s, which guaranteed the destruction of Moscow with a flight time of 6-7 minutes. This gave the positions of the states strength. Those. they could be guaranteed to destroy the leadership of the USSR within a time during which one might not have time to give the order to retaliate.
      Now the ABM treaty is no longer valid, and the states have lost their position of strength. Moreover, Russia may now unexpectedly strike with the Vanguard, which the states cannot track and repel. Those. the position of power is now in our hands.
  27. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 2 June 2021 13: 25
    +1
    The global leadership of the United States is already history. The world is becoming multipolar, and as far as human rights are concerned, it is not the United States to teach others this after what these bastards did in Vietnam by spraying agent orange chemical weapons from helicopters, killing everyone and everything in Iraq, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Syria.
  28. Daria33
    Daria33 2 June 2021 14: 58
    +1
    Republicans and Democrats, in principle, will not be able to reconcile in the United States. By definition, they must confront each other))) Excuse is not good. Let them come up with another.
  29. Kostadinov
    Kostadinov 2 June 2021 15: 11
    +3
    The United States has established the reason why they still cannot "defeat and defeat" Russia or China.

    The reason is obvious - there is not enough strength.
    And that is why the USSR and the PRC did not defeat the United States in the 20th century, although the forces were beating in a beaten-up - this must be established and the mistake will not be repeated.
  30. NF68
    NF68 2 June 2021 16: 03
    0
    I really do not want to get it in the forehead in return. That's the whole reason.
  31. CYM
    CYM 2 June 2021 17: 16
    0
    At the same time, Washington has been able to use human rights concerns as a foreign policy tool.
    For now, human rights concerns have boomerang back into US domestic politics. So let them first completely atone for their guilt before their African-Americans, Latin Americans, Indians ..., and then we'll see what remains of the "world leader". winked
  32. sagitovich
    sagitovich 2 June 2021 17: 54
    0
    Why we are always silent about the violation of the rights of Indians and blacks in the United States. We, too, should always designate "USA violating the rights of Indians and blacks" and further on ...
    1. Oleg Aviator
      Oleg Aviator 2 June 2021 19: 14
      0
      Nobody is silent. It's just that the media are silent.
  33. Oleg Aviator
    Oleg Aviator 2 June 2021 19: 13
    0
    The main and main reason is that they will immediately get into the snout. And it hurts. Possibly lethal. If not for this factor, they would have found a reason long ago. But this is not Iraq or Yugoslavia. Nuances are possible here
  34. Barkun
    Barkun 3 June 2021 13: 39
    0
    Quote: Lesovik
    Quote: Civil
    who left both Russia and China atomic weapons

    It did not save the Union ... Apparently, besides the vigorous loaf, there is something else.
  35. Cucumbers
    Cucumbers 3 June 2021 14: 24
    0
    There is no disagreement there. This is a big top for the local audience. Foreign policy is built and has a long-term strategy. Currently, the US has only 3 opponents. This is Iran. Russia and China. They have already taken up Iran. They want to come to an agreement with us. Judging by how the meeting in Geneva is being arranged (those vaccinated by Sputnik will not be allowed), the requirements for us will be tough. Biden will most likely say: listen, don't bother me to deal with China. Maybe promise candy. The old record about human rights is no longer working. Lukashenka jailed Protasevich, we put Navalny, Maduro did not concede to their candidate
  36. militarist63
    militarist63 4 June 2021 01: 22
    0
    I understand that the navel will crack, with such attempts, that's ... sad