Refuse and purchase. Pentagon plans for the development of tactical aviation of the Air Force


F-22 fighters will retain their place in the future US Air Force fleet

The US continues to develop its military budget for the next FY2022. In recent weeks, the issue of spending on the development of the air force and the renewal of the fleet has been actively discussed at different levels. aviation technology. The Pentagon comes up with bold proposals, which, however, do not find support among lawmakers. The main reason for criticism against him was the proposal to decommission a large number of aircraft.

Withdraw and replace

Currently, the US Air Force is armed with fighters of seven models and modifications, and some of this technology is of considerable age. In mid-January, a spokesman for the Air Force headquarters said that the average age of the aircraft exceeded 28 years. 44% of machines last longer than their designated service life, and the operating costs of the existing fleet are growing twice as fast as inflation, which is directly related to the physical obsolescence of equipment.

It is proposed to solve such problems in the simplest way. It is necessary to decommission the oldest equipment, the further use of which is unprofitable and impractical. Aircraft in an acceptable condition will be sent for long-term storage, and those that have exhausted their resource can be recycled. At the same time, it is necessary to purchase promising tactical aircraft with high tactical, technical and operational characteristics.

F-35A purchases will continue

A plan for such a modernization of the park was presented. It provides for the decommissioning of 421 aircraft of a number of types by the end of FY2026. To replace them, 304 new machines should be ordered. First of all, it is planned to reduce the long-obsolete F-15C / D - all 230 plus. It is also necessary to decommission 124 F-16 fighters of the first modifications and series. The fleet of A-10 attack aircraft will have to be reduced by 63 units. The possibility of reducing other categories of aviation was considered.

More than 180 available F-22 fighters will remain in service for now; their fate will be decided only by the beginning of the thirties. The fleet of newer F-35s will gradually grow, and by 2026 the Air Force wants to have 220 such aircraft. Full-scale production of the new F-15EX will be mastered, which will produce 84 more fighters. Aircraft of other models will remain in service and undergo scheduled repairs.

As a result of such processes, the total number of tactical aircraft will be reduced by almost 120 units. In addition, instead of seven types, no more than four or five will remain in operation. At the same time, it will be possible to maintain the required combat capability, as well as reduce operating costs - and use the saved money on new programs.

F-15EX - one of the new products for the Air Force

In the long term, after 2026, new cuts are possible. The Air Force hopes that during this period, the replacement of old aircraft will be carried out at the expense of promising next-generation NGAD fighters. They plan to pay for ongoing work under this program, incl. by saving on outdated equipment.

Year plans

At the end of May, the main proposals of the Ministry of the Air Force for the next financial year, included in the draft military budget, became known. They are broadly in line with previously announced ideas, with almost half of all proposed cuts in 2022. In just a year, it is proposed to decommission 206 aircraft of various types, not only tactical aviation.

F-15C / D and F-16C / D may undergo the largest reductions next year - 48 and 47 aircraft, respectively. Also, 42 A-10 attack aircraft can be sent for storage. Together with them, they want to write off 20 RQ-4 UAVs, 28 KC-10 and KC-135 tanker aircraft, as well as 13 C-130H transport aircraft and four E-8 air command posts.

F-15C and F-15E fighters. Older cars will be sent for storage

To make up for the "losses" of tactical aviation, the Air Force wants to buy 48 F-35A fighters for $ 4,5 billion and 12 F-15EX for $ 1,3 billion. Plans for the newest KC-46 tankers have been increased to 14 units, which will cost 2,4 billion.

In general, the draft budget required $ 156,3 billion for the needs of the Air Force. This is 2,3 billion more than allocated in the current financial year. It is planned to spend $ 63,2 billion on operation and maintenance of equipment, almost $ 2,5 billion more than in FY2021. However, by reducing the fleet of obsolete aircraft, it is planned to optimize costs and receive some savings. According to current estimates, it will reach $ 1,3 billion.

The released funds can be used in other programs, incl. when developing a promising NGAD aircraft. FY2021 the Air Force will spend $ 902 million on this project. A budget of $ 1,52 billion is proposed for next year. The NGAD program is also funded by the navy, but their contribution in FY2022 is $ XNUMX billion. classified.

F-16C in flight. This technique is waiting for some reduction.

To get approval

The Air Force's draft budget must go through the required audits and be approved by Congress. The latter is likely to be in trouble. According to the American media, lawmakers have already criticized the draft military budget in general and plans to modernize the Air Force in particular.

First of all, dissatisfaction was caused by the very proposal to reduce the fleet of combat aircraft. Congressmen always treat such ideas badly, even if they are forced or provide some benefit. A separate reason for criticism is the "attempt" on the A-10 attack aircraft, which have a lot of supporters at all levels. Several years ago, the Air Force already tried to get rid of such technology in favor of modern machines, but then it was not possible to do this - due to new problems and pressure from Congress.

In the near future, Congress will have to consider all the articles of the new military budget, make and agree with the Pentagon on amendments, and then adopt it. How and to what extent the real budget will differ from the presented project will become known later.

A-10 attack aircraft will remain in service, but in smaller numbers

Challenges and responses to them

According to open data, the active US Air Force fleet now includes approx. 1800 fighter-bombers and attack aircraft of various types. This makes American tactical aircraft the most numerous and powerful in the world. At the same time, the latest 5th generation F-35A fighters and the outdated F-15C / D are in service at the same time. As a result, the Pentagon faces operational, financial and organizational problems.

It is obvious that the existing problems require an early and complete solution. It is necessary to get rid of old and unprofitable aircraft and replace them with modern technology, as well as prepare for the future acceptance of the next generation of technology. This is exactly what the Air Force Command, the Air Department and the Pentagon are proposing. However, such ideas have not yet received clear support.

It seems that in recent years the rate of decommissioning of old equipment has been insufficient. Because of this, an excessive number of obsolete aircraft have accumulated in the troops, the operation of which takes extra money. Sooner or later, you will have to get rid of them, and you should not delay the solution of this issue. If 200 aircraft are not decommissioned in FY2022, then more aircraft will have to be phased out during 2023 - and the outrage will be even louder.

A KC-135 tanker transfers fuel to the E-8C command post. Both types of machines fall under the cut

The Congress will have to face objective problems and pay more attention not to the "losses" of tactical aviation in the near future, but to the processes of its further development. So, modern F-15EX in all respects are much better and more profitable than the outdated F-15C / D - and the gain in quality fully compensates for the reduction in the number of vehicles. At the same time, there is a special case with the A-10 attack aircraft, which have no direct replacement.

Selection time

Thus, the US Air Force finds itself in a rather difficult situation that limits their capabilities and prospects. However, there are several ways out of it, each of which has its own advantages. In one case, it will be possible to redirect money to other purposes, while the other will allow maintaining a record number of military aircraft.

The Pentagon is now drafting a budget for the next fiscal year, as well as making plans for a longer period. Which of these plans will be accepted for implementation depends on Congress. In the coming months, the military and lawmakers will have to form and approve the final version of the military budget. And after that it will become known exactly how the Air Force will develop in the coming years.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    2 2021 June
    Promising doesn't mean getting married. But I am for the fact that the Americans continue to buy a dead penguin. But the new F15 is a serious machine. Especially considering its ammunition load.
    1. -2
      2 2021 June
      pumping money into the military budget is a kind of method for mattresses to save, including the real industry of the United States)
      and what results will be (hopefully bad for the states), wait and see))
      1. 0
        August 12 2021
        You are absolutely right. Many companies simply will not survive without orders from the Pentagon, or if they survive, they will lose a huge number of workers and developers. The problem is that we, for example, for the Air Force, have very few companies left. There were Northrop, Mc Donnell Douglas, Boeing, Lockheed, Chance Vout, Conway, North American, and now there are mostly Boeing, Lockheed and General Dynamics. EVERYTHING, there are no more companies. The Pentagon has nowhere to go. And the only remaining firms he HAS to support. A fighter is not an M16 / M4 that can be produced by almost any factory. And obviously not AP180, which can even be assembled in the garage. But the fact that the companies intensively absorbed and destroyed each other drove our Air Force almost to a dead end. There are 3 companies left and 3 KB - that's it. And these companies also know that the Air Force has nowhere to go. It was in the 50s-60s the lafa for our Air Force and the Air Force of the Fleet. There were about 10-12 companies, and if one starts to overly break the price, here are 10 more that will sell the same plane cheaper. Well, or they will build a similar one. But not now. Capitalism in action. Leads to MONOPOLIES ...
  2. +1
    2 2021 June
    USAF: 4 F-15EX / 16 / 35A / F-22 fighters will remain. By the 30s, the F-15C / D, F-15E, old F-16 and A-10 will be decommissioned. It is also planned to replace the F-16 "with something else." I think it will be a jet, relatively cheap UAV fighter and / or a deep modernization of the F-16. F-22 will be replaced by NGAD in the 30s.

    Navy: FA-18E / F, F-35С. With the replacement of the 18th by the FA-XX also in the 30s.

    Marines: F-35В / С
    1. 0
      5 2021 June
      Quote: OgnennyiKotik
      cheap UAV fighter

      for the fighter to be relevant, it will have to be equipped at a high level.
      if the UAV costs a lot, its only advantage will be the absence of a pilot
      so I don't think such rearmament will be active. The development of flying arsenals and other types of order diversification will be much more likely.
      For example, a UAV is a radar or electronic warfare that hangs behind for 50-100 km in relative safety.
      it is possible that they will create highly specialized UAVs - leaders that will participate in the battle at the front line and have specific characteristics supported technically from behind.
      But I don't think it will start anytime soon - the costs are too high and radical.
  3. 0
    2 2021 June
    It seems that there are no questions (quantity and "quality") to the PLO and AWACS aircraft.
  4. +1
    2 2021 June
    They need to buy more than 15x! The F-15EX is 1,5 times cheaper to operate than the F35. At the same time, the resource of the new F-15 is 20 thousand flight hours. The combat load of the F-15EX is 13 tons. Stealth is not always needed + he is really a super fighter. There are pilots, infrastructure, etc.
    1. -2
      2 2021 June
      Stealth is not always needed

      so they buy different types of aircraft in a balanced way
  5. 0
    2 2021 June
    At the expense of RQ-4 Global Hawk did not understand at all! Where do so many withdrawals come from? 20 pieces is almost half of the entire park, isn't it?
  6. +1
    3 2021 June
    Give money, we need to save!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. 0
    3 2021 June
    Quote: EvilLion
    Give money, we need to save!

    Removed from the "language")))
    Give me denehhh too!
    I'll buy you something too !!!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"