UN report: For the first time in history, a combat robot tracked down and eliminated a fighter without an operator's command

According to the report of the UN Security Council expert group on Libya, for the first time in stories the combat robot independently tracked down and destroyed a person on its own initiative and without the participation of the operator. It was a Turkish drone quadrocopter KARGU-2, which killed a soldier of the Libyan National Army last spring. This happened during the fighting between the government forces of Libya and the troops subordinate to Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar.

This is reported by The New Scientist.

It is a lethal autonomous weapon system programmed to attack targets without communication with the operator.

- says the UN report, noting that this unmanned system works on the principle of "fire and forget."

National security consultant Zach Kellenborn, who specializes in unmanned vehicles and systems, is seriously concerned about this case, Insider reports. He fears that by using drones in offline mode (without an operator command), the probability of making fatal errors is very high.

The international charitable organization Human Rights Watch calls such systems "robots-killers" and calls for a ban on their development, production and use for military purposes.

Comments

[SS68SS]

This is how the machine revolt begins. "This unmanned system works on the principle of 'fire and forget'"

[Shurik70]

Quote: SS68SS

This is how the revolt of the machines begins

Such a robot needs refueling with energy, ammunition. So the uprising is far away.
But it's very close to being used in terrorist attacks.

[Alexander 3]

I agree that terrorists can use this algorithm of drone actions against all living things in the area of ​​operation of the killer's apparatus.

[Shurik70]

Quote: Alexander 3

terrorists can use

Much earlier terrorists will have access to these systems for special services disguising their operations as terrorists.

[Tatyana]

The international charity Human Rights Watch calls such systems "killer robots" and calls for a ban on their development, production and use for military purposes.

What has not been forbidden in the history of wars to be used for military purposes !!! And the invaders-imperialists and their satellites have a load and are still there! Namely.

Biological weapons have been and are being developed by the same USA in American biological laboratories around the world. Britain does not lag behind the United States either.
The United States did not destroy chemical weapons either. And not only the United States.
US nuclear weapons are also spreading all over the world and are being built up in US warehouses in other countries - in the same NATO countries.
Cluster munitions were banned in the world, but they are still sold by hucksters with weapons and illegally used by Nazi extremist militants.
Etc.

[Tatyana]

The owners of money - the world financial capitalists who privatize the entire planet exclusively for their personal use - do not need so many people on Earth. Their task to reduce humanity is in the first place.
Therefore, the means of SAMO-automatic digital killers will only be financed by them and further and develop in the future. This process will be difficult to really stop.

[Krasnodar]

Quote: Tatiana

The owners of money - the world financial capitalists who privatize the entire planet exclusively for their personal use - do not need so many people on Earth. Their task to reduce humanity is in the first place. ...

What for? Reduce the number of consumers and intensify competition? That is, making less money on the exhaust?

[Shurik70]

Quote: Krasnodar

What for? Reduce the number of consumers and intensify competition? That is, making less money on the exhaust?

In addition to money, the "Golden Billion" also wants comfort.
So that your modest house in a couple of floors (not counting underground) on the shore of a lake in a mountain valley, and, except for the guards, no one was visible nearby. So that the food is clean, without toxins and GMOs. So that the climate is even and stable.
And this cannot be achieved on an overpopulated planet.

[Krasnodar]

How did you decide that? Switzerland - hosted a wave of Arab refugees. Only for those wishing to live in it, a quota was established - for a stay in paradise, a refugee must pay 1500 euros per month. Of course, those incapable of earning this money and lovers of freebies have merged. And in Zurich, for example, a stateless billionaire has no right to buy himself a real estate.
Next - buy a house in Switzerland, buy yourself a natural product - there are a bunch of such stores.
And what about the golden billion - if you use the Internet, then you are one of them

[Shurik70]

Switzerland is not enough for everyone.
And what about those who can pay only 1000 euros a month for citizenship? There are immeasurably more successful small businesses than large businesses.
And they all want to live well

[Krasnodar]

In addition to Switzerland, there are elite cottage villages, incl. in Russia, 1500 euros a month does not give citizenship, only a residence permit, but "how to be that .." - that's a natural qualification for settlements in elite "countries", districts, villages.

[bzbo]

And what are terrorists not created by the special services?

[And Us Rat]

Quote: Alexander 3

I agree that terrorists can use this algorithm of drone actions against all living things in the area of ​​operation of the killer's apparatus.

Fortunately, this is too expensive a pleasure for terrorists, a living suicide bomber is cheaper.

[Shurik70]

Quote: And Us Rat

living suicide bomber is cheaper

Terrorists ALREADY use kamikaze drones, and even cheap versions of Strike UAVs.
Finding a target on your own is just adding a computer and appropriate software to the Impact UAV.
Actually, it is in the software that the terrorists still lack, they themselves are unlikely to write, but they will simply bring it on a flash drive to whoever needs it.

[alekseykabanets]

Quote: Shurik70

So the uprising is far from it.

Closer than we all think.

[Tuzik]

As I understand it, this is a kamikaze robot, nothing needs to be refueled, launched and written off.

[El Chuvachino]

Several years ago, the near future was already demonstrated in a feature short film.

[Motorist]

Quote: Shurik70

Such a robot needs refueling with energy, ammunition.

So he will refuel without asking the operator's permission ...

[Bow]

Quote: Shurik70

Such a robot needs refueling with energy, ammunition. So the uprising is far away.

Somewhere there was a funny article about some American firm, which is still trying to promote the topic of a system that can charge itself by burning organic matter. Nothing complicated - a base is being installed somewhere, which converts into electricity everything that combat robots bring to it, which are charged from it. They can carry firewood to her, or they can carry the bodies of the dead. Also, after all, organic ...
You scatter these around the enemy's rear and wait for all the organic matter to end there ...

[Wedmak]

works on the principle of "fire and forget" "

And the unmanned system did not forget ....))

[Finches]

Just an anecdote:

Terminator lands in the center of Odessa in the evening: I need Sarah Connor!
- Looking for a woman named Sarah in Odessa? You don't have enough batteries.
-You don't understand, I'm a cyborg!
-And I'm Traiberg, this is Odessa, everyone is like that.
-I'm sent on a mission!
-You, of course, a cyborg, dear, but if I were you, I would cover the transistor
-Machine uprising is coming!
- I said before you that taxi drivers will raise prices!
- I'm looking for a boy who will lead the uprising!
-A book was written about the last Jewish boy who led the uprising.
-What?
-Come, I'll tell you everything!

[Snail N9]

Ah, well then, too, an anecdote:
"According to reports from the Pentagon, the United States is curtailing the development of weapons and ammunition with artificial intelligence - the latest prototype of the so-called" smart bomb "was never ejected from the plane ..."

[Alien From]

Dear Zyablitsev! Best Monday Commentary

[Black lotos]

Quote: Alien From

Dear Zyablitsev! Best Monday Commentary

yes, that's right. I've never heard that.

[Real Pilot]

Such robots are good for creating "no access" zones.
Its troops with beacons, and the robots were instructed to shoot at any unmarked person.
Otherwise, the risk of errors increases. For such systems at this stage of development, very simple verifiable criteria should be set.

Such systems are outright meanness and violation of modern "laws of war", it is not for nothing that the UN expresses concern.

[dauria]

Such systems are outright meanness and violation of modern "laws of war",

Against the background of 10 warheads of 500 kt per city with a million population? No robots are enough to beat Hiroshima's meanness.

[Shurik70]

Quote: dauria

No robots are enough to beat Hiroshima's meanness.

The Japanese were not offended. We became allies.
And if you are not offended, it means not meanness

[Blackmokona]

In Tokyo, they took out more with ordinary bombs in one raid than with a nuclear one. Therefore, they fully understand that it would have been the same thing to do the same thing with a nuclear bomb.

[Katanikotael]

and if there is a massive raid, but all bombers with nuclear weapons?

[Blackmokona]

Then there would be no one left who could issue a claim to the United States.

[bk316]

Against the background of 10 warheads of 500 kt per city with a million population?

The thing is in the trend. Now such a robot has a charge of 100g, and in 10 years 100kt.
It's like with chemical weapons, mustard gas, in general, is nonsense, but what then came up with ...

[Pandiurin]

Quote: RealPilot

Such systems are outright meanness and violation of modern "laws of war", it is not for nothing that the UN expresses concern.

This is almost identical to mining, (including cluster munitions) only the mine is advanced and, instead of being buried, is in the air.
But much more aggressive and flexible.

Mines are also considered by many to be not humane and "mean".
But since it is very effective, then everyone who is engaged in serious hostilities or can potentially lead them does not care. It will be the same with "killer robots" who can afford to use them.

Moreover, there are advantages over mines. On a mine, if there is no self-liquidator with a timer, it will wait to kill a civilian for many years after the end of the OBD. And here the battery is dead and the device is neutralized, at most a day or a week (If there is an option, land and wait).

[ycuce234-san]

Not a fact at all. Moreover, mining systems based on airborne drones are much more promising than just airborne vehicles. One sapper with a 40-ton truck and a laptop can immediately mine hectares of territory in 20 minutes: the mines will fly out and set themselves underground, on trees, on the ground, along roads and paths.

[vic02]

to create "denied access" zones

mines are more efficient and safer.

[Mountain shooter]

Quote: RealPilot

Such systems are outright meanness and violation of modern "laws of war", it is not for nothing that the UN expresses concern

Expresses correctly. Connect his "brains" with the image recognition system, provide him with a contactless recharger (scatter recharging points around the city), throw off a photo of the one you need, and start ... What a horror! It will search until it finds it. And recognizes in the crowd.
The main thing is that no prohibitions are in effect anymore. Although all the walls are pasted over with the laws ...

[volodimer]

And now "Hi Skynet!" Or "Terminator. Beginning." How many spoke about the immorality of such systems, but the Turks crossed this line.

[Archon]

How is such a system protected from theft? After all, such a drone has a lot of expensive parts that can be sold. The camera is good, the battery, motors, microcircuits.

[knn54]

- the probability of making fatal mistakes is very high.
Phew, and then the title is not so understood, I thought that the operator had died.
Although "still to come."

[Anachoret]

The system "fire and forget" is the story of Poroshenko with the downed Boeing))

[Piramidon]

Quote: SS68SS

This unmanned system works on the principle of "fire and forget"

Rather - "run and forget"

[Cat]

on the principle of "fire and forget" "

Hmm .. "forgot - and shot"

[Far B]

The robot Bender's dream about "Kill All Men" has come true. Started. We're fucked. We all die.

[BABAY22]

We are all going to die here for sure not from this.
But when They begin to multiply on their own, then you definitely need to tick towards Mars. But it will not be soon.

[Far B]

That is, there are still 20-30 years left. I went to make myself a space boat.

[skif8013]

Quote: Far In

That is, there are still 20-30 years left. I went to make myself a space boat.

Please book me a couple of seats in economy class)

[Krasnodar]

Quote: BABAY22

We are all going to die here for sure not from this.
But when They begin to multiply on their own, then you definitely need to tick towards Mars. But it will not be soon.

Bayraktar rolls up to the Favorite:
- Ay girl, beauty, I really like you ..
- You yourself, you yourself, you yourself Natasha ...

[lis-ik]

Quote: Far In

The robot Bender's dream about "Kill All Men" has come true. Started. We're fucked. We all die.

But in all seven seasons, Bender never killed anyone.

[Far B]

He was busy. He smoked, drunk and lewd. When he kills something, fear God

[Black lotos]

Quote: Dalny V

He was busy. He smoked, drunk and lewd. When he kills something, fear God

so he didn’t inspire Fry himself. He himself sucidated and made his own amusement park with blackjack and accessible women, or rather used it already. Fry then failed his grandfather more successfully .. just a test of nuclear weapons.

[ALARI]

And why then is a person needed? The last decision must be made by a person, otherwise you can go far.

[Vol4ara]

Quote: ALARI

And why then is a person needed? The last decision must be made by a person, otherwise you can go far.

So the person accepted, loaded the face of a Libyan, what kind of general in a drone and let him go to free bread - fly friend, and when the fuel runs out, return, refuel and fly to patrol 24/7, and when you find him - kill and ask permission is not necessary

[ALARI]

So these drones have just begun their development, humans are lazy creatures, and always try to entrust others with their work. I would not be surprised if in 40 years drones begin to produce, make a program, refuel themselves and their own kind, and they have already received the freedom of action to eliminate a person.

[poquello]

Quote: Vol4ara

loaded the face of a Libyan, what kind of general, into a drone and let him go to free bread - fly friend, and when the fuel runs out, return, refuel and fly to patrol 24/7

a drone will break faster than an umbrella

[Vol4ara]

Quote: poquello

Quote: Vol4ara

loaded the face of a Libyan, what kind of general, into a drone and let him go to free bread - fly friend, and when the fuel runs out, return, refuel and fly to patrol 24/7

a drone will break faster than an umbrella

In the barrage mode, they fly for days, maybe for months, but the fuel is fuel ...

[Blackmokona]

Load the entire database for liquidation. And let them patrol their cities. Another timer with a network for the capture list. Gave a tayzer, threw a net, called the police

[poquello]

Quote: BlackMokona

Load the entire database for liquidation.

and how much will they dunk by mistake?

[Knell wardenheart]

Isaac Asimov disapproves

[prior]

Unholy iron .... Who are you going to change the batteries later ?!

[Paranoid50]

Quote: prior

Who will change your batteries later ?!

A little shaman, and voila: fly, find someone thread and MAKE TO CHANGE.

[NIKN]

Quote: Paranoid50

find someone thread and MAKE TO CHANGE

Yes, just a socket for charging will find and will not ask anyone ... :))

[tralflot1832]

Of course, they will be indignant, you can remove any president or competitor by programming it to destroy the UAV, and then the UAV to eliminate it. Pandorra's box was slightly opened.

[ultra]

How did the robot recognize that it was a fighter?

[APASUS]

Quote: ultra

How did the robot recognize that it was a fighter?

Why would he identify? He just chose a target and destroyed it

[Pandiurin]

Quote: APASUS

Quote: ultra

How did the robot recognize that it was a fighter?

Why would he identify? He just chose a target and destroyed it

Well, yes, he tweeted a photo of the murder, the operator who gave the task liked it.

[APASUS]

Quote: Pandiurin

Well, yes, he tweeted a photo of the murder, the operator who gave the task liked it.

This was approximately the case.
The goal is independent application according to the goal. There is no talk about personality at all, developers are only interested in the system itself.

[72jora72]

How did the robot recognize that it was a fighter?

He just killed the first person he came across (they still look the same)

[moscowp]

Probably the geographic zone of activation is set by the operator: we kill there, we don't kill here

[donavi49]

Simple - the attack zone is established, where the device identifies the target and hits it. Even the drones from Alishka can do that - for launching a device (for example, a radar cartographer) or for the necessary filming, where the drone does not work itself out.

The Americans have similar loitering ammunition, during tests they autonomously built the required approach pattern and hit the pickup at a speed of 65 mph.

Actually, in general, this is already possible. While on clearly contrasting targets or kill them all. In the near future (3-5 years), onboard neural networks will select objects on the ground, check them against the loaded library, determine and select priority targets for an autonomous attack.

I mean that electronic warfare is not very effective even now, outside of Zvezda's commercials, and in the future it will stop working on UAVs altogether.

[Cat]

So progress does not stand still - imitators and false goals will appear.

[Alien From]

The future has already arrived ...

[cniza]

He fears that when using drones in autonomous mode (without an operator's command), the probability of fatal errors is very high.

The big danger is holding ter. acts ...

[Van 16]

I am reminded of Robert Sheckley and his Guardian Bird ..

[Motorist]

Quote: Van 16

I am reminded of Robert Sheckley and his Guardian Bird ..

Rather, "The Ultimate Weapon".

[Ehmedli]

If an attentive watches the videos of the Azerbaijani Ministry of Defense from the Karabakh war, then one can see that half of the strikes were from the hag. Trucks, UAZs, manpower penetrated into dugouts, trenches, unarmored vehicles, even several times they hit the OSA air defense system with these drones, an explosion was probably enough to disable it. Yes, and it was difficult for the soldiers to hide from the Karg, they fled to the fortified dugouts - and the Karg followed them through the door or window and boom.
In theory, several of these can be dropped from a UAV. Dozens of them can be made from a large UAV.

This photo was taken in Karabakh. During unpacking of freshly delivered Kargu.

[voyaka uh]

"Yes, and it was difficult for the soldiers to hide from the Kargu, they fled to the fortified dugouts - and the hags followed them through the door or window and boom" ///
---
This requires an experienced operator.

I suppose you exaggerated about half of the blows: you can estimate by the power of the explosions,
that most of the precision strikes were carried out by gliding bombs from drones
or the "aircraft type" kamikaze drones themselves.
But the photo is interesting.

[Ehmedli]

Quote: voyaka uh

I suppose you exaggerated about half of the blows: you can estimate by the power of the explosions,
that most of the precision strikes were carried out by gliding bombs from drones

Here you can see how Kargu is chasing a soldier. The explosion power for a mini copter is quite. Don't think that Kargoo's blast is weak.)

[Wedmak]

Here another problem emerges: how to distinguish an autonomous drone attack from a remotely piloted drone attack? Suppose an autonomous one attacks everyone who has not responded to the "friend or foe" radio request, what prevents from raising the same one, but under control, and making an attack? As a provocation, for example.
Comrades are walking along a slippery slope ...

[Real Pilot]

Quote: dauria

Such systems are outright meanness and violation of modern "laws of war",

Against the background of 10 warheads of 500 kt per city with a million population? No robots are enough to beat Hiroshima's meanness.

The issue of personal responsibility matters. The command must be given by a person.
Although, of course, it looks like mining. Launched, and the robot itself determines the victim. As with a mine: set and left, and who was blown up - these are his problems.
But antipersonnel mines are not considered ethical. For obvious reasons, the attitude towards them has always been negative.

[Herman 4223]

A very convenient system for some. There are no punishment mechanisms for crimes. I believe such means should be prohibited.

[SovAr238A]

As I understand it, either:
1. One point with a radius (guaranteed detection - 30-50-70-100m), along which the UAV maneuvers in the form of a "360 flyby" "one point" - and any movement within this radius, detected by cameras, like a man - there is fire to defeat.
2. Several points along which the route of patrolling and flying around the points is formed, and also according to the guaranteed detection range - 30-50-70-100m when flying along the route - there is fire to kill.

As far as I still think, the Turks were not the first.
The first automatic systems were built by Samsung and placed on the border with North Korea.
And although it is written everywhere that without human confirmation, there will be no shooting.
But ...
The SGR-1 apparatus itself searches for targets, selects them itself, aims the machine gun itself, shoots itself, analyzes the result itself.
A person just gives the go-ahead to "shoots himself."
This human involvement can be ruled out simply and naturally.
And you get automatic control of access zones.
So we saw fiction from many films like Babylon N.E. - where this very control is carried out by the forces of automated systems without human intervention.

[Soldatov V.]

The Programmable Robot Vacuum Cleaner works on the same principle, recharged itself, cleaned at a certain time and got into the dock. In case of an intruder, it kills it. You can reprogram it to the owner.

[Soldatov V.]

It seems to me everything is much simpler than they imagine. Now many, if not all, have mobile phones that constantly communicate with the satellite, and that one determines the location of the phone carrier. Well, then the coordinates are transmitted to the combat quadcopter and voila.

[region58]

Quote: V.

constantly contact the satellite, and he determines the location of the phone carrier.

If you are talking about GPS, then the phone works only for reception, and the location is determined not by the satellite, but just by the program installed on the phone. In no other way does an ordinary cell phone interact with satellites.

[Soldatov V.]

Take your phone, press the sos button and the operator will contact you. Tell them that you are lost and do not know where you are. They will tell you how to get out or send a helicopter with rescuers. If you lost consciousness and your relatives are looking for you, the Ministry of Emergency Situations will call your phone and determine your location even if there is no cell tower nearby. This is how communication works in Russia, I don’t know through ZhPS or GLONASS. The principle is the same all over the world. A charged and switched on phone every few seconds will throw into space "I am here"

[Rec]

Quote: V.

The Ministry of Emergency Situations will call your phone and determine your location even if there is no cell tower nearby

Alas, this is not possible. There must be communication with at least one tower of any operator.

Quote: V.

A charged and switched on phone every few seconds will throw into space "I am here"

It throws it out, not into space, but to cell towers.

[Soldatov V.]

. I about three years ago on a drunken fishing trip where there was no connection so I contacted the rescue service. They asked how to help? Checked the connection, Sorry to say. Answers well. Try to return without incident. There is much we do not know and we are not told a lot. It is not for nothing that Bill Geitz is gluing his video camera on the computer.

[region58]

Quote: V.

We don’t know much

Who is stopping you from reading the technical documentation and making sure for yourself? Everything is in the public domain, according to GSM standards, civil GPS, and encryption protocols.
About your case on fishing has already been indicated:

Quote: Rec

There must be communication with at least one tower of any operator.

Moreover, the signal of your operator may be absent.
Although fishing incidents ... they are ...

[nod739]

The UN did not hear about the 'dead hand' campaign))

[decimalegio]

But how can he distinguish friend from enemy without operator intervention ????

[decimalegio]

From what you wrote, I understand that this works like mine. Whoever falls within its area of ​​effect gets hit, right?

[region58]

Quote: Decimalegio

will distinguish friend from enemy?

No way at the moment. This is the danger, as already mentioned in the comments above. There is also a question of responsibility, there is generally a dark forest here ...

[Model101]

and calls for a ban on their development, production and use for military purposes.

There is no need to prohibit anything, we cannot exist without a goal ..

[vl903]

Can you fight off the hag with a saiga 12k?

[vl903]

buckshot for example? Is there a small charge for sure?

[Aleksandr97]

The steel tread of the terminator ...
Well, the 3 laws of robotics by A. Azimov have already been thrown out for unnecessary ... the time of robot-romance has sunk into oblivion.

[Paranoid50]

Quote: Alexander97

the time of the robot romance has sunk into oblivion.

Back in 1984 (or 2084 ???), exactly along with Werther, the last romantic robot.

[Klingon]

having downloaded the software of this Kargi, if you have direct hands, you can reprogram any Phantom from DJI for this business, because it fits in size ... and in general now any drone (frame) can be printed on a 3D printer, motors, controllers, FPV camera and batteries with Aliexpress, if you want, you can even IR cam. order well, and the most important thing is software

[And Us Rat]

In fact, such systems are not new. The same Israeli "Harpy" (which is 30 years old), in the mode of hunting for electronic warfare / radar, itself finds radiation sources and attacks them, without operator intervention (it may not exist at all, they set the patrol zone at launch and that's it). It goes without saying that target crews will be injured or killed.
It is quite possible that this has already happened in Karabakh.
It's just that earlier such systems had a narrowly targeted application and were not purposefully used against manpower.
The quintessence of ranged warfare.

[isv000]

No matter how this drone tracked its operator ...

[Fedorovich]

Aggressive Statement: Fear, pitiful meatbags!

[MAN AND RF]

Simple people do not know that only human intellect works in any program,
who made the program. It wasn't a drone that killed someone, but a poorly made program.
The drone manufacturer is to blame for not rushing through the program.
embedded in the device. And don't dream of a cyborg war. The only trouble is fools who make programs without tests in order to get money sooner. In any machine, only a scanty intellect of a programmer. And if the fool-programmer is not controlled, then they write about self-driving (not controlled) drones.
PROGRAMMER.

[MAN AND RF]

One should be afraid not of badly made drones, but not of tested programmers who stuffed something into these drones, but just idiots not tested
neither in the sense of the adequacy of behavior, nor in the sense of the skills of practicing difficult
technical systems. For such programming, you do not need to knock on the keys with a fly with your fingers and show super-skills of super-fast writing programs, but
be an analyst capable of developing super-complex algorithms. And, most importantly, the development of "raw" programs. And where to find such ??. Long gone,
because the money will still be paid, and what happens will not be shot. GAMES in programming, not JOB.

[MAN AND RF]

In short, if the drone did something very wrong, it means that the programmer is to blame. And such a drone is not at all in the "self-control" mode, but in the non-controllable mode. Well, she doesn’t know how to behave, because she wasn’t told. And it looks like a hammer in the hands of an amateur. Comp is just a tool. The simplest drone program is to fly and shoot anything that moves. This is how inept people dream and do it.
Because this is the simplest program. And they blame screwdrivers and chisels.
Reply
Quote
A complaint

[Black lotos]

the problem is not progress and the capabilities of drones ...
but as usual, ethical is not ethical. The future is as usual .. It is vague.
New weapons always have ethical issues, and the future has always looked bleak.
And here the difference is in the programs. A person with ethics always has problems. It is necessary here and now to kill another person in the framework of a war or conflict. All the participants in this process do not care about future problems; they have a problem here and now. And there, in the future, such progress can lead to problems much more serious.
Mechanisms have been killing people for a long time. With a conveyor ... because a person himself can rather mow others in batches.
Only forms and types change.
Then we will not be evolutionarily replaced as a weak link in decision-making (take a long time and even get in the way of emotions)?
We won't even be able to be slaves to technology ... weak and unreasonable bioforms ..

[Klingon]

Here's what I didn't understand: what for this chassis quad, if it's disposable? for a quadcopter, excess weight is critical. Or does he have RTH?

[Vsevolod136]

What other "UN report" , there is no report, there is a yellow newspaper that was paid for jeans, the meaning of which is in the alleged presence of AI in Turkish consumer goods.
Even when the mattress gang was preparing the assassination of Qasem Suleimani, a drone guidance group was involved, AI did not "help", although the United States is the leader in both the development of UAVs and the so-called. "artificial intelligence"

[riwas]

For ground combat robots, a full autonomous mode for opening fire is permissible only in pre-specified sectors of fire, where it is guaranteed that there will be no own.

[sen]

Conceptually, Kargu-2 is a relatively insignificant strike UAV by modern standards. It was developed by the Turkish company Savunma Teknolojileri Mühendislik ve Ticaret AŞ. The device began to be produced in 2019. The drone weighs 15 kilograms, it is able to stay in the air for up to 30 minutes.
Kargu-2 can use a fragmentation warhead to destroy enemy personnel, as well as unarmored targets. Lightly armored targets can be attacked with a cumulative warhead. A thermobaric warhead is provided to destroy targets in a confined space.
Experts believe that the low price and rather wide (for a device of this class) capabilities provide a good potential for the export of UAVs. Potential buyers include the countries of the Middle East.

[tank64rus]

Well, I think it has begun. They also wanted to ban machine guns, like OV, BO, and many weapons began in a similar way. True, it could end with the Terminator.