Military Review

The FSB told about the expulsion of the British Navy ship from the territorial waters of Russia

49

The FSB of the Russian Federation told about the expulsion of the British Navy ship from the Russian territorial waters of Russia near the Crimean coast in October 2020. In the operation against the destroyer D35 Dragon, the forces of the Border Guard, the Naval fleet and the Russian Aerospace Forces.


About this in an interview RIA News said the first deputy head of the FSB and the head of the border service Vladimir Kulishov.

This incident is reported for the first time. Prior to this, the incident with the British destroyer was mentioned in interview To Rossiyskaya Gazeta, Russian Deputy Defense Minister Alexander Fomin, but he only said that the D35 Dragon passed through Russian waters near Cape Chersonesos near Sevastopol.


Details have become known only now, from the head of the FSB Border Service. He said that a warning was given to the British destroyer URO, but despite this, the ship crossed the Russian border near Cape Chersonesos. The British were demanded to immediately leave our water area, but from the destroyer board they referred to poor signal reception. Then they had to carry out an operation to expel him.

The head of the border service noted that the FSB constantly monitors the "unfriendly activities" of the NATO armed forces near the Russian borders. Most often it is expressed in the form of a show of strength.
Photos used:
British Navy
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. For example
    For example 27 May 2021 12: 10
    -42%
    What did you have to expel?

    The troughs with which bad people equipped the border guards are only capable of ramming in calm weather.

    It was not for nothing that these vessels were called the Coast Guard. For they are not able to fight with the enemy of the sea.
    You can shmalnit along the shore from a cannon. But this also needs to be done only in complete calm. As if the recoil did not turn the vessel over.


    That is why the English-speaking and their jackals are insolent because they are well aware of the vessels with the inscription "Coast Guard".

    There is also "Bykov Vasily" which could not shoot even with a container version with calibers. The boat was so famously designed that the "modularity" that those who sold this misunderstanding to the fleet prayed for could simply flood this trough.


    And here they wrote about the Poles that they had the last submarine left.

    Our maritime border guards have nothing at all.

    Blue-and-white boats are only suitable for carrying women along the coast.
    1. APASUS
      APASUS 27 May 2021 12: 22
      +15
      Quote: For example
      What did you have to expel?

      Just turned on the target designation radar "Ball"
      1. For example
        For example 27 May 2021 12: 24
        -17%
        Quote: APASUS
        Just turned on the target designation radar "Ball"

        Maybe so.

        Why then all these white and blue vessels, if their work is performed by "Ball", "Bastion", VKS and others?

        And most importantly, the sailors are happy to defend their borders themselves, but they have no options other than ramming.

        But the guys with big stars made of golden ligature mastered the budget and, despite everyone who thinks about the fleet, equipped the border guards with expensive toys.
        1. kpd
          kpd 27 May 2021 12: 30
          +8
          And who will drive the fishermen and traders? To drive a full-fledged ship on them - it will be fat. And there are much more trifles than NATO fighters.
          1. For example
            For example 27 May 2021 12: 59
            -11%
            Quote: kpd
            And who will drive the fishermen and traders?

            There is no point in driving these.
            These need to be met correctly.

            In every sense of the word "meet".
        2. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 27 May 2021 12: 30
          +11
          And what do you want to arm the border guards with? Cruisers? Their tasks are patrol and security. And not the conduct of a naval battle. They called the Aerospace Forces, they covered them and squeezed them out.
          1. For example
            For example 27 May 2021 13: 06
            -10%
            Dmitry, at least with ships that can handle 30 knots.
            The size must be sufficient to carry out the assigned tasks.
            The weather at sea is different from calm. fellow

            No need to invent bicycles.

            And do not think everyone around you is worse than yourself. And who is building a cruiser now?

            Quote: carstorm 11
            They called the VKS, they covered them up and squeezed them out


            From a sick head to a healthy one.

            Why the heck then we need these vessels that cannot solve the problem.
            And they will not be able to detect the intruder.

            Only women to carry along the coast.

            Or as the reader writes here, "to drive fishermen and hucksters."
            1. carstorm 11
              carstorm 11 27 May 2021 13: 56
              +3
              What are the tasks? Do you want to put everything in bulk? The water area is being patrolled. Target is detected. And depending on the goal, the main forces are called in or carry out the assigned task of protecting the border. Duty units will take off or call the Navy. The tasks of the frontier service and the navy are not the same, and also understand already.
            2. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 27 May 2021 17: 34
              +1
              Quote: For example
              Dmitry, at least with ships that can handle 30 knots.
              The size must be sufficient to carry out the assigned tasks.

              And we smoothly come to ave. 22350. Which will be used once or twice a year. And the rest of the time will be redundant for SOBR. Because chasing fishermen and other offenders on it is like fighting pirates performed by "Peter the Great".
        3. Marconi41
          Marconi41 27 May 2021 12: 36
          +8
          Quote: For example
          And most importantly, the sailors are happy to defend their borders themselves, but they have no options other than ramming.

          Border guards do not have to fight the navies of other countries. Do you at least read the concept of development of our BO. For these purposes, there is the interaction of border guards with the Navy. You can look at the border ships of other countries in one go and look for battleships there.
        4. Polite Moose
          Polite Moose 27 May 2021 12: 52
          +11
          Quote: For example
          Why then all these white and blue vessels, if their work is performed by "Ball", "Bastion"

          Everything works in a complex. Imagine: an adversary of any class and displacement goes to our border. He is accompanied by blue and white boats. The adversary naturally does not care about them. Then the target illumination radar on the DBK turns on, there is a short radio exchange through closed communication channels and the boats, as panicky as possible, scatter in different directions at maximum speed. The captain of the foe is guaranteed to acquire a more noble appearance due to the appearance of gray hair on the temples.
          1. For example
            For example 27 May 2021 13: 09
            -5
            Quote: Polite Elk
            Imagine: an adversary of any class and displacement goes to our border. He is accompanied by blue and white boats

            "Supostat" runs 30 knots. Excitement at sea. wave height 2 meters.

            Б
            Quote: Polite Elk
            He is accompanied by blue and white boats.

            "blue and white boats" are not able to "accompany" in this case.

            They can only wave their handkerchiefs.

            We again remember BAL, Bastion, VKS.
            1. Polite Moose
              Polite Moose 27 May 2021 13: 44
              +3
              Quote: For example
              "blue and white boats" are not able to "accompany" in this case.
              They can only wave their handkerchiefs.

              Okay! Then the blue and white boats, after turning on the radar to illuminate the target from the shore, generally stop the course, give a long beep at the same time and lower the flags.
      2. knn54
        knn54 27 May 2021 13: 48
        -4
        - (Pavo: Just turned on the target designation radar "Ball"
        The missiles of the "Bastion" complexes were destroyed by the air defense systems of the frigate "Admiral Grigorovich" during the test exercises.
        Do you think that the British destroyer has weaker missile defense systems?
        At the same time, they could "copy" the parameters of the radar and set the coordinates, if there was the appropriate equipment on board.
        1. APASUS
          APASUS 27 May 2021 15: 48
          +2
          Quote: knn54
          Do you think that the British destroyer has weaker missile defense systems?

          I believe that the DBK is always in a more advantageous position than a ship on the high seas.
          Quote: knn54
          At the same time, they could "copy" the parameters of the radar and set the coordinates, if there was the appropriate equipment on board.

          What for ? There, and so the whole control room shone like a Christmas tree, in warnings of an attack.
      3. frruc
        frruc 27 May 2021 19: 18
        +2
        He was very upset that he was not drowned.
    2. kventinasd
      kventinasd 27 May 2021 12: 22
      +13
      Quote: For example
      Blue-and-white boats are only suitable for carrying women along the coast.

      Why are you so angry? wassat Did you get up from the middle leg today?
      1. For example
        For example 27 May 2021 12: 30
        -12%
        But essentially?
        in October 2020 years


        Long thought to say or be silent.

        Who and what will protect the maritime borders?
    3. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 27 May 2021 12: 29
      +11
      Quote: For example
      What did you have to expel?

      They went on the radio to the captain of the destroyer D35 Dragon and transmitted that a certain citizen Ashot Zargaryan was interested in what point of metal reception the hull of an English vessel entering the minefield zone would be handed over, since he really needed an anchor chain. yes
    4. knn54
      knn54 27 May 2021 13: 00
      -1
      -but from the side of the destroyer they referred to poor signal reception. Then they had to carry out an operation to expel him.
      They just said that the destroyer was "conditionally (for now) destroyed."
    5. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 27 May 2021 17: 27
      +1
      Quote: For example
      It was not for nothing that these vessels were called the Coast Guard. For they are not able to fight with the enemy of the sea.

      Should they? Why are they constantly trying to impose the tasks of the Navy on the FSB, and the tasks of the FSB on the Navy (I'm talking about 22160)?
      The combat ships of the simulated enemy are the target of the Navy. It was not for nothing that in 1988 the naval TFR - "Selfless" and "SKR-6" were attracted to the expulsion of "Yorktown" and "Caron". And PSKR "Izmail" only recorded the violation of terrorist acts and warned the Yankees.
      Quote: For example
      That is why the English-speaking and their jackals are insolent because they are well aware of the vessels with the inscription "Coast Guard".

      And in the days of the USSR, when even modifications of Project 1135 served in the MCHPV, why did these jackals become impudent? And also off the coast of Crimea.
  2. Popandos
    Popandos 27 May 2021 12: 10
    +1
    demanded to immediately leave our water area, but from the destroyer board they referred to poor signal reception. Then they had to carry out an operation to expel him.

    I hope they could see the warning fire with tracer shells.
  3. figwam
    figwam 27 May 2021 12: 11
    +2
    Most often it is expressed in the form of a show of strength.

    They constantly insist that they will communicate with us from a position of strength.
  4. isv000
    isv000 27 May 2021 12: 18
    +7
    There were times when a patrol cruiser took a ram ...
    1. For example
      For example 27 May 2021 12: 32
      0
      Times have not changed.
    2. Catfish
      Catfish 27 May 2021 12: 37
      +4
      Yes, there were times ... The attack by the TFR of the border troops "Selfless" of the American cruiser "Yorktown" near Cape Sarych in 1988



      The son of my friend was serving on "Selfless" just then, he took part in this business. He returned to demobilization, told a lot of interesting things over a glass.
      1. tlauicol
        tlauicol 27 May 2021 12: 59
        +1
        in the photo, not Selfless, but SKR6
        1. Catfish
          Catfish 27 May 2021 13: 18
          +2
          Ivan hi , You are absolutely right, in the photo is SKR-6. I need to be more careful. Here is a photo with "Selfless"
      2. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 27 May 2021 17: 39
        +1
        Quote: Sea Cat
        The attack by the TFR of the border troops "Selfless" of the American cruiser "Yorktown" near Cape Sarych in 1988

        I beg your pardon, but since when did the TFR "Selfless" pr.1135.2, included on February 17.02.1978, XNUMX in the KChF, became TFR of border troops?
        And SKR-6 pr.35 is also a KCHF ship.

        The fact of the matter is that it was the Navy that ousted the adversaries in 1988. And the KGB-shny "Izmail" only recorded the violation and warned the Yankees.
        1. Catfish
          Catfish 27 May 2021 17: 48
          0
          Alexey hi , do not exact strictly, this story happened a long time ago and I could well forget which ship my friend's son served on. But the fact that he was in the Marine Border Guard is for sure.
          1. Alexey RA
            Alexey RA 27 May 2021 19: 26
            +1
            Quote: Sea Cat
            Alexey hi , do not exact strictly, this story happened a long time ago and I could well forget which ship my friend's son served on.

            Yes, everything is fine - I just decided to clarify due to innate boringness. hi
            1. Catfish
              Catfish 27 May 2021 19: 45
              0
              I did not see any tediousness, everything is correct. smile
  5. Mouse
    Mouse 27 May 2021 12: 19
    +4
    we didn’t expect you, but you screwed up ... so please come out! everything is within the bounds of decency ... wink
    1. novel66
      novel66 27 May 2021 12: 35
      +1
      yes, what decency from them ... Vasya hi
      1. Mouse
        Mouse 27 May 2021 12: 39
        +3
        Roman, welcome! hi
        yes where are they? we do not need to be like some ... we need to keep the brand ... yes
        soft power! bully
  6. Catfish
    Catfish 27 May 2021 12: 29
    -1
    Then they had to carry out an operation to expel him.


    What operation, who carried out, what ships participated, what means were used? There is no answer to any question, and one gets the impression that the British simply "cut a corner" through our territorial waters and calmly moved on.

    Hooray patriots, in the absence of specific information, please do not worry.
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 27 May 2021 12: 32
    +1
    Today they do not obey the commands of our border guards in our territorial waters, but tomorrow ...? But this is a direct provocation with the possibility of escalating into an armed incident. The Anglo-Saxons have a greyhound out of their ears. Interestingly, was the submission of the British Foreign Office on the fact of border violation made?
  8. Olgovich
    Olgovich 27 May 2021 12: 39
    0
    And why is it only today, six months later, is it reported?

    the event is not at all ordinary ...
  9. rocket757
    rocket757 27 May 2021 12: 56
    0
    The British were demanded to immediately leave our water area, but from the destroyer board they referred to poor signal reception. Then I had to carry out an operation to expel him
    ... For those who are hard of hearing, only a good "proctologist" can help! In such a non-core role, Shoigu's subordinates have to act. It doesn't work otherwise. Their ears are clogged with hair that flies from their tattered ... cat.
  10. AntiAleks
    AntiAleks 27 May 2021 13: 09
    -1
    bedtime stories
  11. abrakadabre
    abrakadabre 27 May 2021 13: 13
    +4
    The British were demanded to immediately leave our water area, but from the destroyer board they referred to poor signal reception.
    The reference to poor signal reception is solved elementary: the opponent is told that the intruder is taken to escort the DBK and after 1 minute a volley will be fired. After that, give them a countdown on air. For emergency circulation, 1 minute is enough for them. Tea is not a squadron warrant. If within the specified time they do not demonstrate an attempt to leave the territorial waters or do not drift with SOS, fire a salvo of 2-3 missiles and, halfway through, detonate the BG.
    I suspect that the connection will quickly and miraculously improve in the very first seconds of the countdown. Or even a little earlier, at the stage of the announcement of the beginning thereof. In general, it is worth demanding not to leave the water area, but a "stop car" and wait for the coast guard with the inspection team. As with poachers.
    Warnings and commands for the lapel should be given BEFORE an unauthorized border crossing. Not after.
  12. K-50
    K-50 27 May 2021 13: 51
    +1
    To expel, you need to start a special ship, with a strong hull, an icebreaker nose (so that it is easier to bulk up, so to speak "to improve the germination of the enemy") and a fast one, so that they did not have time to escape.
    Here comes such a horror story to intercept, it is likely that the enemy will not have clean diapers. fellow lol
    1. Vladimir61
      Vladimir61 27 May 2021 15: 31
      +1
      Well, then suggest Russian roulette! On the course, a bunch of bottom mines, where there are five dummies, and one ... laughing wassat
  13. Antokha
    Antokha 27 May 2021 14: 53
    +3
    I don’t want to look back at "them", but still. What would the Americans do if our intelligence officer, who is in Hawaii, violated their GG now? Probably, they would have drowned him instantly, and then referred to a bad connection. And they would have picked it up right there and examined it to a screw. I don't think for a second that the Americans would ram. What is this for? There are weapons, use them. And this is absolutely correct. I do not see anything to be proud of here, neither now, nor in the case of the USSR. I watched the video, there are no questions for the guys. They were and are to the command. It is not necessary to sink immediately, but real (not electronic) warning shots should be fired as soon as the ship crosses the border. Then, as it was rightly said, a minute is given to exit.
  14. Looking for
    Looking for 27 May 2021 16: 48
    0
    QUINTESSENCE OF SHOWS.
  15. Dikson
    Dikson 27 May 2021 17: 04
    0
    Have you expressed concern? And even Zakharova did not dance a gypsy girl? .. How long did it take for the Turks, after they recorded the violation of the air border by our plane? How long would it take for the Americans or the same British to destroy our ship, which entered their territorial waters without permission? So you can launch a radio-controlled firebrand ... with a radio game ..
  16. salad
    salad 27 May 2021 18: 35
    0
    What is the article about?))) I understood that it floats, and then?))
  17. viktor_47
    viktor_47 27 May 2021 21: 08
    0
    And drowning the violator was weak ?!
  18. Alex Freman
    Alex Freman 28 May 2021 13: 59
    0
    Classics of the genre. The further we are from events, the more nuances will appear. A year later, some will say that after this incident, half of the ship's crew applied for resignation.