The terms of the first launch of the submarine missile carrier "Knyaz Oleg"

The first serial nuclear-powered strategic missile cruiser of the improved Borei-A project, Prince Oleg, will go for testing at sea in early June.

APRKSNN "Knyaz Oleg" is currently undergoing tests, including state tests, the submarine will make its first exit to the sea in early June. However, according to a source in the defense industry complex, whose words are quoted TASS, plans may change and "Prince Oleg" will enter the sea ranges much later.

The source also suggested that the planned commissioning of the first serial "Borey-A" by the Day of the Navy will not take place, since the submarine will simply not have time to pass the entire test program in the remaining time. For our part, we note that this date (Navy Day) for the transfer of "Prince Oleg" to the fleet has already been denied by the head of the USC, Alexei Rakhmanov, who said that the submarine will not be handed over until October this year, it will have a large test program, including launches of Bulava.

Currently, Sevmash, apart from the undergoing tests of Prince Oleg, is building three submarines of the Borey-A project - Generalissimo Suvorov (laid down on December 26, 2014), "Emperor Alexander III" (laid down on December 18, 2015 of the year) and "Prince Pozharsky" (founded on December 23, 2016). Two more "Boreya-A" - "Prince Potemkin" and "Dmitry Donskoy" will be laid down during this year.

Four Boreas are in service with the Russian Navy, of which three projects 955 (Borey) of the 4th generation are strategic missile cruisers Yuri Dolgoruky, Alexander Nevsky and Vladimir Monomakh, as well as one submarine missile carrier of the modernized project. " Borey-A "-" Prince Vladimir ".

Comments

[Vladimir_2U]

Successful tests and the same service!

[Anachoret]

So that the number of dives is equal to the number of ascents)
Three times) Hurray Hurray URAAAA !!!

[Doccor18]

... that the planned commissioning of the first serial "Borey-A" by the Day of the Navy will not take place, since the submarine will simply not have time to pass the entire test program in the remaining time.

Who cares what day ...
It is important to hand over a combat-ready ship to the Fleet, and not to be promoted for the holiday. When will this window dressing stop ...

[Piramidon]

Quote: Doccor18

Who cares what day ...
It is important to hand over a combat-ready ship to the Fleet, and not to be promoted for the holiday. When will this window dressing stop ...

Soviet traditions are alive.

[Doccor18]

Quote: Piramidon

Soviet traditions are alive.

Then, the number and time of commissioning of the ships "Soviet Traditions" were supported ...
And then it turns out one-sided.

[Stepan S]

It seems that the article gives the answer that no surrender is planned for the holiday, but traditions are alive, if not there, then for sure here.

[1976AG]

In general, the show stopped a long time ago.

[Mountain shooter]

We build and build. The nuclear triad is intensifying. A significant part of it is submarine missile carriers.
It is not worth believing the publications that the FSE submarines, the oceans are transparent, NATO sees every rivet on our boats even at depth. There are no omnipotent and all-seeing. RESOURCES are limited for ALL. And money does not solve this. People, ships, airplanes, devices ... Fuel, flight hours, resource of devices and delivery vehicles. Human factor and technology failures.

[Vladimir1155]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

It is not worth believing the publications that the FSE submarines, the oceans are transparent, NATO sees every rivet on our boats even at depth.

I completely agree that war is a tactic, this is a strategy of stealth that is the advantage of nuclear submarines in the ocean, and it is not easy to find everyone there, and even more so in the ocean which is sooooooo big and deep, this is not the Baltic Shallow Sea where there is really an opportunity to find a boat and then you will have to look for it first

[nPuBaTuP]

"Varshavyanka" not so long ago, Nata searched for a long time in the Mediterranean .... I never found

[Vladimir1155]

Quote: nPuBaTuP

"Varshavyanka" not so long ago, Nata searched for a long time in the Mediterranean .... I never found

Yes! what about the oceans

[AC130 Gunship]

When these boats go at a speed of 5 knots on Akb, they are not heard at all. Atomic missile carriers (except for Tom Clancy's Red October) do not have this yet.

[prior]

"How the prophetic Oleg is now being assembled ...."
Everything would be fine. But the titles ?!
Princes with nuclear missiles on guard of Russia is an oxymoron of some sort.
And the USSR, which created these submarines and missiles, seemed to have nothing to do with it.
Is the Russian language really so poor that you cannot find a worthy name for the missile carriers?

[Doccor18]

Quote: prior

Is the Russian language really so poor that you cannot find a worthy name for the missile carriers?

The Russian language is great and mighty!
And how many heroes our Motherland has, after whom the ships of the Navy could be named!
Yes, even in honor of Shabalin Alexander Osipovich, twice hero of the Soviet Union, elusive and formidable torpedo boat boat.
The BDK is named after Alexander Shabalin, but for SSBNs such a name, in my opinion, would be more successful. Shabalin instilled fear in the Nazis, SSBN - keeps "partners" in good shape ... Yes, and this BDK will soon be written off anyway, the 37th year of the ship ...

[Piramidon]

Quote: prior

"How the prophetic Oleg is now being assembled ...."
Everything would be fine. But the titles ?!
Princes with nuclear missiles on guard of Russia is an oxymoron of some sort.
And the USSR, which created these submarines and missiles, seemed to have nothing to do with it.
Is the Russian language really so poor that you cannot find a worthy name for the missile carriers?

To call the ship "Generalissimo Joseph Stalin" is very scary for the current government.

[prior]

And what would the adversaries feel, they would be as cramped!

[Piramidon]

Quote: prior

And what would the adversaries feel, they would be as cramped!

Our Russian liberoids would have suffered even more.

[knn54]

-underwater missile carrier "Prince Oleg"
Apparently in the leadership of JSC "UNITED SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION" (or nearby) Rurikovich.
Or they have a grudge against the "Khazars" ...

[prior]

It is unlikely that the AO has anything to do with the names of the ships planned for construction.
Probably the name appears at the stage of drawing up the technical specification and design.
What is good about the commanding and obscene language, it allows you to clearly, quickly and emotionally accurately formulate the task and demand its execution. So it is with the name.
But what if the name of the ship is of the type "Prince Yuri Dolgoruky"? How to contact them?
"Hey, on the prince ..." "Hey, on Yurik ..." "Hey, on Dolgoruky ..."
It sounds ambiguous, and the full name is too pretentious and long.
The team should be as short as a shot, otherwise there will be no time to rest.

[Oleg Aviator]

Do you think that abusive language is beneficial?) In fact, it is not even Russian at all. There are a lot of convincing words in the Russian language. And in the army there are officers who do their job and communicate like people and are not much smarter and more practical than a swearing ram and are not able to do anything themselves)

[prior]

Do not pretend to be innocence, Everyone who served knows perfectly well what language they communicate in the army. At the same time, only pretexts for a bunch of swear words were normative.

[paul3390]

Actually, it's not even Russian at all.

Why do you think so? Judging by the Novgorod letters - very Russian ..

[ROSS_51]

Quote: prior

And the USSR, which created these submarines and missiles, seemed to have nothing to do with it.

With what fright did the USSR create them?

[prior]

With that fright that in Russia, basically, what was designed and created in the USSR is being modernized. We will keep silent about hypersound, although these legs grow from the same place.

[ROSS_51]

Quote: prior

With that fright that in Russia, basically, what was designed and created in the USSR is being modernized. We will keep silent about hypersound, although these legs grow from the same place.

This clear conviction of yours is in no way true in this case. You also propose to call the boats Cyril and Methodius ... because the TK was written in Russian ..
To begin with, take an interest in the years of the beginning of the design - the USSR did not smell there anymore ..

[prior]

Of course you can be ironic. I have no questions about the names "Moscow Region", "Kazan" ... and many others. We have a huge number of worthy places and cities, there will not be enough boats.
And the names of the land princes, who had nothing to do with the fleet, and their merits are puzzling.
And this is just my opinion, I do not impose it on you.
In tsarist times, ships were given the names of saints. Also an option and also a sea of ​​questions.

[musorg]

Of course plans will change and will be released later. Why all these messages came out reported.

[Oleg Aviator]

I hope that they will have time to finish building the required amount to sober up the mattresses.

[Gunther]

Quote: Piramidon

To call the ship "Generalissimo Joseph Stalin" is very scary for the current government ..

Piramidon, more likely to be called Nicholas II)))
this is a consequence of the construction of an estate neo-feudal construct, if you look at the site of the dark-haired "heiress of the gussky pgestol" Maria vladimirovna, you will find early-maturing princes-baronies, including those from the generals of Russia.
but, if a year we release 12 nuclear submarines and call them from the martyrology Holstein-Gottorp offspring, I will only be glad.

[hose end]

We'll create human conditions for the crew, but they won't show it on TV.

[saffron]

This Prince Oleg will destroy half of Europe with one salvo of missiles. The jokes are over, 10 submarines of this class will be launched into the water.
This is the only way to ensure peace for yourself.