German environmentalists intend to stop construction of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline

54

German environmentalists are not abandoning their attempts to slow down, and ideally even stop the construction of the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline. The German environmental organization Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH) made another demand to stop pipe-laying.

Despite the fact that the German government is in favor of the earliest possible completion of the gas pipeline and its commissioning, German environmentalists do not intend to back down from their demands to stop the construction. The organization Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH) has already announced plans to file a protest against the decision of the Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency of Germany (BSH), which allowed the immediate completion of a section of the gas pipeline in German waters.



Thus, environmentalists are filing a protest in court in order to freeze the construction of the remaining 2 km section in the exclusive economic zone of Germany. At the same time, ecologists hide behind loud slogans about the "incompatibility" of climate protection with the operation of the gas pipeline. They called the suspension of construction their primary task, and then they are planning a complete ban.

Earlier, an attempt was made by environmentalists from a non-governmental environmental organization (NABU), who managed to ban construction from September to May, but the BSH agency bypassed this ban, allowing immediate pipe-laying on this site. The agency said that work must begin no later than the end of May in order to have time to finish laying while the permit is in effect.

Meanwhile, the State Duma Energy Committee said that in the absence of any interference and the participation of both pipe-layers, the laying of the remaining pipes of the gas pipeline will be completed within two months.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    54 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +3
      18 May 2021 10: 11
      Let's see who is more influential, ecologists or moneybags industrialists.
      1. +32
        18 May 2021 10: 16
        Let's see who is more influential, ecologists or moneybags industrialists.
        Environmentalists serve the interests of the moneybags, only others.
        1. +6
          18 May 2021 10: 17
          Quote: Trapp1st
          Let's see who is more influential, ecologists or moneybags industrialists.
          Environmentalists serve the interests of the moneybags, only others.

          From third countries ..
          1. +7
            18 May 2021 10: 49
            A sensible and objective description of the Nord Stream 2 situation:

            The project turns Germany into the central gas hub of Europe and Germany will become the entry point at which, according to the Third Energy Package, Gazprom will be cut off and squeezed out at a price... The intra-European gas price is 4-5 times higher than the entry price. Thus, the Germans become not only the main energy regulator in Europe, but also the main beneficiary.


            Actually, this collision caused first the Ukrainian crisis, and then the US sanctions against Nord Stream 2. At the start of the reformatting of Europe's energy landscape, American companies tried to penetrate the German domestic market, but they were very toughly squeezed out. Thereafter for the United States there was a threat of complete loss of control over the economy and politics of Germany.

            There was a threat to the energy integration of Russia and Germany. And the projects would have been implemented long ago, but the Germans decided to throw everyone away. First, they squeezed the Americans out of their market, and then, with the help of the Third Energy Package, they deprived Gazprom (read Russia) of access to the EU internal market. They pushed through the Third Energy Package only thanks to the orchestrated and initiated gas wars of Ukraine with the withdrawal of Russian gas from the pipe.

            Time was lost, realizing the game of Germany, the United States initiated and organized the Maidan in Ukraine. Then Boeing and sanctions against Russia. Then Skripali, Navalny and other offal ... All for the sake of strengthening anti-Russian sanctions and blocking Nord Stream-2. That is why the United States told the Germans that the project is only possible if we (the United States) get the right to promptly manage it (turn it off and on).

            Source: https://t.me/Burovaia/3789
          2. +3
            18 May 2021 10: 51
            Yes, you cannot achieve your external pressure - find, buy and direct traitors inside the country to solve your problems.
            Corporate identity of the States.
            Specifically, these ecolouches do not care how the Germans will warm themselves in winter and how much it will cost them. They need "greenery". bully
            1. -7
              18 May 2021 12: 16
              Quote: Alex777
              Specifically, these ecolouches do not care how the Germans will warm themselves in winter and how much it will cost them.

              It is for heating that the Germans pay a penny, well, if you count according to their income level. On gas, roughly if - euros per month per square meter of total area. So ... Even with the doubled gas price, you will be tortured to wait until the Germans freeze out. Yes
              And in general, if in heating, then the Germans move away from gas. If in 2011 the share of gas heated in new buildings was more than 50%, then in 2020 it is less than 30.
              And the only reason why the Germans are still buying our gas in substantial volumes is the very same ecolouches that crushed the German atom and coal. Without those same ecolukhs, Gazprom would not receive euros from Germany, but a fig with poppy seeds. Yes So .... You shouldn't roll a barrel on the German ecologists. They did not do more for Gazprom than all the ministers of the Russian Federation. And in the free lobby, to Miller, they still did not sign up. They just act within the framework of their ideology.
          3. +5
            18 May 2021 10: 57
            moneybags, only others
            financed by grants, in particular, the ClimateWorks Foundation (USA), the European Commission and its own government of Germany.
      2. 0
        18 May 2021 10: 25
        And here "SPIRITS" ...
        1. +4
          18 May 2021 10: 56
          All these green, blue, gray-brown-crimson ... these are all political games.
          It should be understood that Germany does not pay a single euro cent - Russian gas is not paid for from the FRG state budget, and private German energy companies are settling accounts with Gazprom.
          Moreover, part of the gas that will go through SP-2 will generally be the property of Wintershall, which produces at the Russkoye field and the Achimov deposits of the Urengoi oil and gas basin.

          Maybe the Americans, with their green Tobaccos, do not understand what a private company is and how it differs from a state company?
          Everyone understands very well, therefore their screams on the topic "Germany is spending its money incorrectly" is purely conducting an information war, an attempt by outright demagogy to divert attention from something that they are unsuccessfully trying to hide.
      3. +5
        18 May 2021 10: 44
        Quote: Model101
        Let's see who is more influential, ecologists or moneybags industrialists.

        The most influential is Gazprom ..... gas prices are growing at a breakneck pace and it is now profitable for Gazprom to delay the construction of the second stream! The Germans understand this very well and therefore put a big bolt on their greens!
        1. +3
          18 May 2021 11: 10
          Quote: Serg65
          The most influential is Gazprom ..... gas prices are growing at a breakneck pace and it is now profitable for Gazprom to delay the construction of the second stream! The Germans understand this very well and therefore put a big bolt on their greens!

          As if so and not quite so. It is not profitable for Gazprom to delay the construction of the stream, since with the departure of Merkel from the post of chancellor (July-August) and the coming to power of a representative from the Greens, problems may arise with the completion of the project, and therefore all interested will strive to finish laying the pipes by the specified date. It's just that now Gazprom pumps just as much gas as is required for current consumption, but at the same time it is not enough to fill underground gas storages in order to prepare for winter. Thus, Gazprom is hinting to the Europeans that in order to quickly increase the gas reserves in the underground gas storage, it is necessary to complete the construction of the SP-2 through which the missing volumes of gas will come and warm everyone.
          1. +5
            18 May 2021 11: 56
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            Thus, Gazprom is hinting to the Europeans that in order to quickly increase the gas reserves in the underground gas storage facility, it is necessary to complete the construction of the SP-2 through which the missing volumes of gas will come and warm everyone.

            So I am about the same! Gazprom is on a horse right now! laughing
          2. 0
            18 May 2021 20: 36
            And what prevents the Greens who have come to power in Germany from coming up with a new energy package in the future and limiting the pumping through SP2?
      4. 0
        18 May 2021 10: 55
        four black ones. grimy imp they drew a drawing in black ink ............
      5. -1
        18 May 2021 11: 41
        Quote: Model101
        Let's see who is more influential, ecologists or moneybags industrialists.

        The Americans paid for ecologists - 100%.
        Babos work out
      6. +2
        18 May 2021 14: 21
        Quote: Model101
        Let's see who is more influential, ecologists or moneybags industrialists.


        Clowns!
      7. 0
        19 May 2021 13: 15
        If the "green" chancellor Berbock comes to replace, they will kill SP-2. And it looks like they won't have time to finish building before the elections.
    2. +7
      18 May 2021 10: 12
      And whose ears are they sticking out from behind the heads of these green men?
      Some painfully familiar stripes and stars.
      1. 0
        18 May 2021 10: 19
        Quote: Popandos
        And whose ears are they sticking out from behind the heads of these green men?
        Some painfully familiar stripes and stars.

        The other day, on the occasion of the growth of anti-Semitism, the Jewish leaders, the Minister of Justice of Germany and lo and behold ... the head of the Green Party was invited, allegedly claiming to be the Chancellor of Germany.
        1. +4
          18 May 2021 10: 59
          Quote: alpamys
          the head of the Green Party was invited, allegedly claiming the role of German chancellor.

          When they apply, they say one thing, but when they are in power, then here ... hello to you - yellow vests, uncontrolled migrants ... recourse
        2. +3
          18 May 2021 11: 17
          Quote: alpamys
          Jewish leaders gathered, the Minister of Justice of Germany and lo and behold .. the head of the Green Party was invited, allegedly claiming the role of Chancellor of Germany.

          This lady, Annalena Berbock, who used to repeat her standard rhetoric about caring for the climate, is no longer talking about “non-ecological” or “dependence on Russia” and other nonsense. The masks have been dropped, and she declares in plain text: "This is a new security threat for Ukraine."
          Annalena Berbock, May 6, speaking at an Atlantic Council event, this is the American think tank at NATO.
      2. +2
        18 May 2021 10: 57
        Quote: Popandos
        And whose ears are they sticking out from behind the heads of these green men?

        Well, like this...
    3. nnm
      +7
      18 May 2021 10: 13
      Interestingly, does the availability of funding for this fund from the funds of an American company affect its position, or is it pure coincidence?
      "Die DUH erhielt seit 2009 Zuwendungen von der amerikanischen" ClimateWorks Foundation ".
      - whoever has dinner with the foundation dances it.
      1. +7
        18 May 2021 10: 32
        It is an accident. German environmentalists are people with clean hands.
        1. +3
          18 May 2021 10: 43
          Quote: Pereira
          It is an accident. German environmentalists are people with clean hands.
          And a dirty conscience.
          They shake the pipe against the interests of their own state. When the SP-1 was laid, German environmentalists did not buzz about the fact that it had a bad effect on the environment at all.
    4. +1
      18 May 2021 10: 19
      A little more and it will be possible to put an equal sign between "ecologists" and extremists. By the way, we haven't seen the news about Greenpeace employees for a long time. They have no joint projects with the "white helmets", by any chance?
      1. +5
        18 May 2021 11: 02
        Quote: Tagan
        They have no joint projects with the "white helmets", by any chance?

        This, their common owner should be asked. Yes
    5. +3
      18 May 2021 10: 19
      We need to finish building these two kilometers in the coming week to shut up.
      1. +1
        18 May 2021 10: 31
        somewhere I met information that the laying speed is 0,4 km / day. That is, you can walk these 2 km for a maximum of 5 days. German judicial bureaucrats during this time will only have time to photocopy the statement of the Greens
        1. +1
          18 May 2021 10: 33
          0,4 was at the beginning. Now a kilometer and a half, depending on the stacker. It takes longer to get to the place of installation.
      2. +4
        18 May 2021 11: 04
        Quote: Pereira
        We need to finish building these two kilometers in the coming week to shut up.

        And these - two and others ... will pass. But shut up, it's no use No.
    6. +2
      18 May 2021 10: 22
      Today it is a lucrative business to be an "environmentalist" in the West, but to engage exclusively in politics (for good money) under this roof. And already in Germany, the "greens" have gained such political weight that Merkel's own party is already barely competing with them. So they are engaged in pouring from empty to empty (lawsuits in the courts ...), trying not to wash, so by rolling, but to disrupt the Russian-German energy project with the participation of several more countries.
    7. +5
      18 May 2021 10: 26
      German environmentalists need to turn off the gas in winter. Don't go to a fortune-teller - by the spring the number of supporters of nuclear energy and traditional fuels will sharply increase.
    8. +2
      18 May 2021 10: 26
      Do you understand, they feel sorry for the birds, you can't make them nervous, you can build, but with two-week breaks. And so the gorgeous weather was established in the area of ​​laying almost calm.
    9. +1
      18 May 2021 10: 30
      The authorities need to take everyone who is against the SP-2 "on the pencil", and then when frosts hit in winter, turn off the gas and heating, they say you were against, so now you don't have enough, drown with wood and dead wood. fellow lol lol
      1. +3
        18 May 2021 10: 34
        Disconnect the environmentalists' office from heating? A good idea. Only it is necessary to send Petrov and Boshirov again.
    10. +2
      18 May 2021 10: 38
      The US pays well for these German environmentalists, as well as Polish fishermen.
    11. +1
      18 May 2021 10: 52
      Amers can not wait through their corrupt "ecologists" to slow down everything that concerns Russia. Not letting Russia earn money and “vparivat” its gas at exorbitant prices is a “mattress” topic.
    12. -1
      18 May 2021 10: 59
      We benefit from the actions of German environmentalists. Germany is a deeply unfriendly country for us, taking into account the fact that it has not yet paid off with us for the Second World War. The more gas we supply, the cheaper it is. Why do we need this? Gazprom, making a profit, leaves it in the west, and for the fact that it sends it home, it again builds pipelines where it does not go. Sanctions were announced - goodbye. Moreover, their money is not real. If we cannot buy what we need (high-tech products for example) then what kind of money it is. The dollar is also a defective currency in this sense. So rejoice that the good in the form of gas remains in Russia, and when the storage facilities overflow then the gasification of the country will really begin.
    13. +3
      18 May 2021 11: 11
      Environmentalists are competing with two ancient professions ...
    14. 0
      18 May 2021 11: 35
      It is understandable that the "German" environmentalists are resisting) after all, with the delivery of the SP-2, the content of the project Ukraine will fall entirely on the shoulders of NATO.
    15. -2
      18 May 2021 12: 25
      Quote: Alex777
      They need "greenery"
      Greens are creeping to greens - the association is pretty awful ... in some places, in some places, does it not happen the same way?
      З
    16. 0
      18 May 2021 12: 32
      German environmentalists do not intend to deviate from своих demands to stop construction

      100% are not their own requirements. Whoever pays them orders the corresponding cries. If Gazprom had paid more, these environmentalists would have run the pipes by hand to lay them.
    17. +1
      18 May 2021 12: 46
      Well, stop it if you don't need gas. How much you can chat.
    18. The comment was deleted.
    19. 0
      18 May 2021 15: 55
      BASF is the largest chemical concern in the world headquartered in Ludwigshafen in southwestern Germany. The company manufactures a wide range of organic and inorganic chemical products.

      The production facilities are represented by six integrated production complexes:

      Ludwigshafen (Germany) - 110 production facilities, 200 production facilities;
      Antwerp (Belgium) - 50 production facilities;
      Geismar (USA) - 23 production facilities;
      Freeport (USA) - 25 production facilities;
      Kuantana (Malaysia) - 13 production facilities;
      Nanjing (China) - 16 production facilities.

      The concern has 376 production sites in more than 80 countries around the world in Europe, America, the Asia-Pacific region and the Middle East and Africa.

      The main areas of work of BASF:

      Oil and gas:
      exploration and production of oil and gas in Europe, North Africa, Russia, South America and the Middle East, as well as trade, transportation and storage of natural gas (jointly with PJSC Gazprom);
      Functional solutions:
      catalysts (automotive and technological catalysts, battery materials, precious metals trade);
      building chemistry (building structures, building materials for the interior);
      coatings (paints and varnishes for automotive and industrial use, decorative paints);
      wear-resistant materials (polyurethanes, thermoplastic materials, foams, epoxy resins);
    20. 0
      18 May 2021 16: 02
      Quote: V.
      We benefit from the actions of German environmentalists. Germany is a deeply unfriendly country for us, taking into account the fact that it has not yet paid off with us for the Second World War. The more gas we supply, the cheaper it is. Why do we need this? Gazprom, making a profit, leaves it in the west, and for the fact that it sends it home, it again builds pipelines where it does not go. Sanctions were announced - goodbye. Moreover, their money is not real. If we cannot buy what we need (high-tech products for example) then what kind of money it is. The dollar is also a defective currency in this sense. So rejoice that the good in the form of gas remains in Russia, and when the storage facilities overflow then the gasification of the country will really begin.

      Where is Germany "not a friendly country" it is not on the list, what kind of shishi are you going to build on? laughing
      Gazprom, making a profit, leaves it in the west, and for the fact that it sends it home, it again builds pipelines where it does not get there. laughing Do not disgrace yourself already. For a start, at least enlighten.
      1. -2
        20 May 2021 14: 24
        What kind of manners on the site, do not disgrace yourself, do not use hard drugs, then who are you to teach. Fomkin is not a Jewish surname? You are not from a bomb shelter from the promised land, do you comment? Germany is our historical enemy. Like Poland, Turkey, England, Sweden. Construction of pipelines for our money is a strategic miscalculation. We need gas, oil, build pipelines at your own expense, at least to our border, and we will see the smelt you don’t frighten at spawning.
    21. 0
      18 May 2021 16: 05
      Spengler to help them, let them revered laughing
    22. 0
      18 May 2021 16: 08
      It should be so - if you want to wash, fly on an airplane, eat meat - welcome to Russia. No - stay in Europe. And the tax goes through the forest. laughing
    23. 0
      18 May 2021 18: 27
      in spite of (grandmother) Russia, let's freeze our ears laughing.
    24. +1
      18 May 2021 19: 33
      where were the ecologists when the Nord Stream was made?)))))))))
    25. 0
      18 May 2021 21: 28
      Honestly, this stream has already asked so much ... That is already deeply give a damn about it.
      They will build it / no ... It is not at all clear whether anyone needs it in principle ...
      And will it be used after completion ...
      In addition, how will this affect the improvement of the quality of life of Russians? ...
    26. 0
      19 May 2021 09: 45
      Quote: Serg65
      So I am about the same! Gazprom is on a horse right now! laughing
      Yeah, a company that sells people's wealth with almost zero profit.
    27. 0
      20 May 2021 15: 38
      Quote: V.
      What kind of manners on the site, do not disgrace yourself, do not use hard drugs, then who are you to teach. Fomkin is not a Jewish surname? You are not from a bomb shelter from the promised land, do you comment? Germany is our historical enemy. Like Poland, Turkey, England, Sweden. Construction of pipelines for our money is a strategic miscalculation. We need gas, oil, build pipelines at your own expense, at least to our border, and we will see the smelt you don’t frighten at spawning.

      Your ignorance and m ... grandfather babble and further your abstruse reasoning does not bother anyone at all about me laughing

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"