American press: the USA and NATO will not fight with Russia over Ukraine

Some Ukrainian politicians, including Volodymyr Zelenskyy, say that in the event of an armed conflict between Moscow and Kiev, the West will come to the rescue by starting World War III. But in reality, the US and NATO will never go to war with Russia over Ukraine.

This is stated by an expert from King's College London, Ivanka Barzashka, an expert on the development of military scenarios, in an article published by The Washington Post.

This publication, like other American press, writes that Kiev should not count on the involvement of the forces of the North Atlantic Alliance in its conflict with Russia, because the West is not interested in a direct military confrontation with Moscow.

Of course, Barzashka does not refuse that America and NATO have promised to protect Ukraine from "Russian aggression." But at the same time, she claims that with a much greater degree of probability Kiev can act as an aggressor. And in this case, the West will remain on the sidelines, and Ukraine will suffer a crushing defeat.

The idea that Kiev can behave extremely aggressively towards the republics of Donbass and even Russia is prompted by the harsh rhetoric of Volodymyr Zelensky about the return of territories lost by Ukraine in the east and in Crimea. Barzashka believes that this is due to his rapidly falling rating. To regain his popularity and stay in power, Zelenskiy may go to extremes and act as an aggressor.

At the same time, according to the expert, he will rely on the Ukrainian army to cope with the LPNR on its own, and the West will not allow Russia to intervene. But in reality, if this happens, the United States and NATO will simply remain in the role of an outside observer who will not do anything to protect Ukraine from the Russian army.

The London expert does not even consider the option in which Moscow will act as the aggressor.

Comments

[SERGE ANT]

This has long been clear to everyone, except for the stoned Nazis from the national battalions.

[prior]

I am sure that the European "barnyard", all sorts of "hyenas", "jackals" and other "grunts" will not want to fit in either. They and African migrants have enough worries.

[Invoce]

Quote: prior

I am sure that the European "barnyard", all sorts of "hyenas", "jackals" and other "grunts" will not want to fit in either. They and African migrants have enough worries.

Taken from the tongue! Jackals feed on carrion. They will wait and eat what will not be digested by the winner. The time when Western countries fought for colonies is over. Now, at best, in addition to incitement, they will be engaged in the supply of weapons on credit, at% ... This has been done with the Rothschilds since the 19th century, and the Rockefellers throughout the 20th century.

[Shurik70]

Still, the Americans really want to provoke a war between Russia and Ukraine.
And, in addition to paying provocateurs in Ukraine itself, they do not forget to repeat tirelessly: "fight, fight, we will not interfere"

[For example]

expert from King's College London Ivanka Barzashka

Purely English creature.

The British have already achieved what they want - the Russians are killing each other in the civil war in Ukraine.
The British know that Ukraine and Belarus are Russia.

Kazakhstan is also Russia.

Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan - were independent only as part of Russia (USSR).

The British are satisfied with the war within the borders of the Russian Empire.

If necessary, Poland and Bulgaria and all the other Eastern Europeans will be drawn into the hotbed of the conflict.

Not when the British (USA, Canada, Australia and other English-speaking countries) will not fight for the Slavs.
And even more so, they will not stop the Russian civil war.

And the fact that in Ukraine someone thinks that he is not Russian but someone else is the problem of this stupid person, but not like the British.

While the Russians are fighting among themselves, the English speakers are developing and milk the whole world. Including the Russians.

Perfect time for English people.

[Vladimir Mashkov]

Quote: For example

... Russians are killing each other in the civil war in Ukraine.

Both you and an Englishwoman with a strange name Ivanka Barzashka ("neither the Americans, nor NATO members will fight Russia over Ukraine") are right. After all, it's one thing to play off each other in every possible way, so that the Russians kill and weaken each other, and quite another thing - by the fight and die with very high chances of defeat!

[Alex777]

Still, the Americans really want to provoke a war between Russia and Ukraine.

All American calculations and simulations of the situation give one result: Ukraine is crushingly losing the war, and the States are losing control over it.
They don't need this. They are happy with everything as it is. Sluggish.
And they want the president to be polite and obedient.

https://topcor.ru/19922-v-ssha-nazvali-neskolko-scenariev-razvitija-ukrainskogo-krizisa.html?yrwinfo=1621320048811120-1644260673562100786900222-production-app-host-sas-web-yp-175

[Cananecat]

So they must be given the command to attack (on their own mines) with machine guns, having previously taken away various equipment.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: SERGE ant

This has long been clear to everyone, except for the stoned Nazis from the national battalions.

And they have no other choice, for them if the Zelensky regime leaves, and healthy forces of Ukraine come, there will come a time when all SS-members, traitors and collaborationists were broadcasting on telegraph poles.

[Alex widerkehr]

You are right. Why do Americans need a war with Russia? What will it give them besides a headache? It is not economically profitable. Is Russia investing in the American economy through the purchase of bonds? The Americans hold large stakes in Russian commodity companies. Big Russian business also contributes to their economy. "Slaughtering a cash cow because she grunts stupidly" Many Russians themselves or their children live in the US, including children from the upper strata of society. Tell me, if your relatives lived there, would you give the order to start the war? Yes, they are fighting for influence over other countries. But no one is going to fight.
After Putin's meeting with Swiss President Didier Burkhalter in 2014. Has dramatically changed the rhetoric of Russia and the troops were withdrawn immediately. This is the fear of the top to lose their money (The version belongs to the head of the financial intelligence of the US Treasury Department, David Cohen. May 4 on the air of CNN).
Nothing brings people together like a common enemy. All propaganda is based on this principle.

[Prisoner]

Performing Ze master. As if to KiVin in black, the ub-lu-dock did not stand out.

[tralflot1832]

The Americans have struck a bell for Ukraine. The Washington post is the mouthpiece of the Democratic Party. Ukraine will be put up for auction. Let's see what Blinkin and Lavrov will agree on in Reykjavik

[tihonmarine]

Quote: tralflot1832

Ukraine will be put up for auction.

Rather, the "remnants of Ukraine".

[Boromir1941]

how much you can waste.

[Blond84]

They change their shoes on the sly, or send signals.

[knn54]

- including Vladimir Zelensky, declare that in the event of an armed conflict between Moscow and Kiev, the West will come to the rescue.
Alas, you can't jump higher than the piano ...
PS And the "World League of Sexual Reforms" will not help because of the dissolution.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: knn54

- including Vladimir Zelensky, declare that in the event of an armed conflict between Moscow and Kiev, the West will come to the rescue.

Mikhryuta Saakashvili also said so, now he is homeless and cannot get rid of constipation from his ties

[Alex widerkehr]

If the West provides military assistance in the event of a conflict, the war can be very costly for Russia. It's not about finances, but about the loss of personnel. An example is the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The Turks helped Azerbaijan and they almost completely destroyed the army of Armenia. You cannot underestimate the enemy. Remember how Pasha Grachev was going to take Grozny with one regiment. How many boys have died? But the Chechens had neither tanks nor aircraft. They only had a dream of a free state. And if the Ukrainians attack Russia will fight to the end. Likewise, if Ukraine attacks Russia, we will fight to the end. We need to negotiate.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Alex Widerkehr

If the West provides military assistance in the event of a conflict, the war can be very costly for Russia. It's not about finances, but about the loss of personnel.

In the West, there are no bad ones to directly harness for Ukraine, and the examples of several boilers following one after the other showed how effective the dill commanders are. This is despite the fact that Russia did not directly participate in the conflict.

Quote: Alex Widerkehr

An example is the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The Turks helped Azerbaijan and they almost completely destroyed the army of Armenia.

The army of Armenia was practically not involved, the armed forces of N. Karabakh and volunteers fought. Although yes, it must be admitted that Turkey's participation in this conflict largely predetermined the outcome of the war.

Quote: Alex Widerkehr

Remember how Pasha Grachev was going to take Grozny with one regiment. How many boys have died? But the Chechens had neither tanks nor aircraft.

There was such a Pasha Grachev. Only at that time the mentality was different, and therefore no one thought that yesterday's fellow citizens were ready to shed so much blood. When they realized the mistake, they began to fight seriously. It is a pity that the mistake cost a lot of human lives. And the Czechs had aviation and tanks, only the aviation was contracted in the first days in hangars and on takeoff.

Quote: Alex Widerkehr

And if the Ukrainians attack Russia will fight to the end.

Ukrainians and dill are very different individuals, and therefore not all Ukrainians will be against the introduction of Russian troops and will greatly help strangle the dill, which spoil the water there.

Quote: Alex Widerkehr

We need to negotiate.

It is necessary, I do not argue. However, it makes no sense to negotiate with Kiev and the prospects for stabilizing relations between Russia and Ukraine since the decision-making center is located not in Kiev, but in Washington. So we will see what the Bidon and VVP will agree on at a meeting "face to face."

[Alex widerkehr]

Regarding the participation of the Armenian Armed Forces in the war. Pashinyan based on the report of the General Staff of Armenia on losses in the army. He signed a decree on the cessation of hostilities. The news on the channel "Shant ARTN" was also announced there. An Azerbaijani friend of mine knows the Armenian language well. Until 85, he lived in Spitak after the earthquake, he lives in Rostov. He lived with the Armenians and said only good things about the neighbors and friends of the Armenians. We served as conscripts in Hungary together. But now they are all enemies to him. But the main enemy for him is Gorbachev. It will be the same if a war breaks out between Russia and Ukraine. Part of the hard workers will defend their homeland Ukraine.
As an example. Part of the Russian population is dissatisfied with Putin's anti-people policy. But in the event of a threat, we will all stand up to defend the Motherland. Although, apart from protecting the property of the oligarchs, we have practically nothing to protect
With regard to the Ukrainian army, they also made conclusions and reorganization. We carried out a partial rearmament. The same Turks received drones.

[markant1970]

Almost a copy of yesterday's article, with the same message

[rotmistr60]

US and NATO will not fight Russia over Ukraine

Well, even a specialist in the development of military scenarios expressed an opinion that the "friends" of Ukraine tried to convey to the Ukrainian leadership for a long time, smoothing it out with various promises. But it is useless to explain something to those who for some reason have convinced themselves that they are the "navel of the Earth" and for which the West will rush to fight with Russia. What is clear to others is completely incomprehensible to the Bandera government, which feeds its population with invented tales about the EU and NATO.

[HAM]

But they will give money to support the entire Caudla on the border of the LDNR and Russia. Not very much, so that they are hungry and angry ... and armed.

[Ruslan Sulima]

But they will give money to support the entire Caudla on the border of the LDNR and Russia. Not very much, so that they are hungry and angry ... and armed.

Well, almost it is, they released the gin from the bottle, there is already nothing to feed it, but what to do with it HZ ...

[iouris]

And Russia will not fight over Ukraine.

[Borz]

All subsequent ukropresidents, if any, will preserve the good tradition of broadcasting without fail about the return of the "occupied territories" in all forums and political platforms, before the elections, during and after them. Just like the Japanese do. Each prime minister of the country of the rising sun, entering the election race, promises and vows to return the Kuril Islands. Without this there is no way. In Ukraine, this is complemented by a small-town flavor - here both Russian aggression and #worldly people and a lot of other blatant nonsense.

[Ruslan Sulima]

We read, prepare, wait.
I will say this, the more such statements in the European, US (here's also the Australian, she has not been noted here, you have to look) the press, the more our combat readiness increases.

[Soldatov V.]

Nobody will fight for Ukraine. You have to understand that Ukraine is a neutral zone between the West and the East, a strip cleaned by artillery fire, missile and bomb attacks from both sides, in case of a conflict. This also applies to Poland and the Baltics. It is desirable for a British expert to calculate the survival of Great Britain in a military conflict with Russia.

[Anachoret]

The Ukraine-non-Russia project was not initially launched for direct confrontation with Russia.
In the years 13-14, the Final Solution project in Ukraine was also made for the sake of direct military aggression from Russia, but the GDP did not appear in the war, which greatly upset the collective West.
Now everything is also rolling according to this scenario. No one will fight for Ukraine, the current regime in Kiev is suicide bombers for the sake of the subsequent tough sanctions reaction of NATO countries.
No one wants a direct conflict, but everyone wants to eat the corpse of a hungry bear, exhausted by the sanctions. Hence all the reasons for jackal bites along the borders, to take away strength and resources for reaction. Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Japan and the Baltics, etc.

[cniza]

Zelenskiy can go to extremes and act as an aggressor.

I have the impression that this "aggressor" is afraid of his own shadow and does what he is ordered to do ...

[Alex widerkehr]

You are right. Why do Americans need a war with Russia? What will it give them besides a headache? It is not economically profitable. Is Russia investing in the American economy through the purchase of bonds? The Americans hold large stakes in Russian commodity companies. Big Russian business also contributes to their economy. "Slaughtering a cash cow because she grunts stupidly" Many Russians themselves or their children live in the US, including children from the upper strata of society. Tell me, if your relatives lived there, would you give the order to start the war? Yes, they are fighting for influence over other countries. But no one is going to fight.
After Putin's meeting with Swiss President Didier Burkhalter in 2014. Has dramatically changed the rhetoric of Russia and the troops were withdrawn immediately. This is the fear of the top to lose their money (The version belongs to the head of the financial intelligence of the US Treasury Department, David Cohen. May 4 on the air of CNN).
Nothing brings people together like a common enemy. All propaganda is based on this principle.

[Oleg Aviator]

Of course they will not only become the hands of their jackals.

[Kerensky]

This is stated by an expert from King's College London, Ivanka Barzashka, an expert on the development of military scenarios, in an article published by The Washington Post.

Alarming. All sing with one voice. But when such people publish such articles, they preliminarily refer them to the "where to" check ...
That is, they send us a lot of signals that no one will fit in for Ukraine. But the signals are from our enemies. Believe?

[lvov_aleksey]

politics is a terrible force, on August 8, 2008 we defended South Ossetia from the aggressor, we defended the peacekeepers there! And now they handed out the passports of Russia, DPR and LPR, and our citizens should not be touched !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ps this is not our territory, but our citizens !!!!!

[Sergey Averchenkov]

I'm tired of Ukraine - there is no urine, I understand that there is no place without news about it ... but it is possible a little less often - my sincere request.

[Alex widerkehr]

Well, you give. What to write about then and take the main broadcast? About the achievements of biochemists who provided everyone with milk and cottage cheese from palm oil. Or about how the eighth year of import is going on, the substitution but everything cannot come. Maybe about advanced medicine in the Kremlin clinic? Or about the Superjet 100 engineering marvel. From which everyone turns out because of the danger to passengers.
People need to scare the horror stories. Otherwise, they will not stop at the palace in Gelendzhik.