Military Review

Army special forces will be equipped with armored vehicles "Typhoon" K-53949 4x4

59

Separate special forces companies of the combined-arms armies will receive the Typhoon K-53949 4x4 armored vehicle for equipping.


As reported "News" With reference to sources in the Ministry of Defense, the corresponding decision has already been made.

The Ministry of Defense has decided to equip the spetsnaz companies, which are being created in the combined-arms armies, with Typhoon-K armored vehicles, also called Typhoonok. According to the military, it is these armored vehicles, not the Tigers, that can operate autonomously for a long time, while providing sufficiently reliable protection for reconnaissance groups operating behind enemy lines.

Compared to the Tiger, the Typhoon K-53949 is a heavier vehicle. The curb weight of the armored car reaches 14 kg, and the full -000 kg. Machine length - 16 mm. Width -000 mm. Height -6760 mm. The ground clearance is 2550 mm. A diesel six-cylinder engine with a capacity of 2840 hp is installed. The maximum speed on the highway is 433 km / h. Cruising range up to 350 km. Capacity - 105 people.

In the reconnaissance version, the armored car can be armed with a remote-controlled combat module with a 12,7-mm machine gun.

The two-axle armored car has powerful armor protection capable of withstanding bullets from a Kalashnikov assault rifle or an SVD sniper rifle. The declared protection against various mines and landmines is very high, the armored car can successfully survive the explosion of 6 kg of TNT under the bottom and any wheel. Tires tubeless with mine insert, with adjustable air pressure.
59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. swnvaleria
    swnvaleria 17 May 2021 11: 26
    +4
    serious car
    1. ssergey1978
      ssergey1978 17 May 2021 11: 37
      0
      According to the description, it seems like yes, seriously. As in the case will be. Again, armor protection only from 7.62 bullets is not enough?
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 17 May 2021 11: 41
        +14
        Quote: ssergey1978
        Again, armor protection only from 7.62 bullets is not enough?

        It's not a tank. Protection like in an armored personnel carrier
      2. swnvaleria
        swnvaleria 17 May 2021 11: 45
        +7
        but mine protection, as the military says, is an order of magnitude better than that of the tiger, a remotely controlled weapon station, and this is now more important, the same patrolling in Syria is easier to carry out.
    2. bk0010
      bk0010 17 May 2021 16: 09
      +3
      Quote: swnvaleria
      serious car
      16 tons of weight, cannot swim, but only 7.62 armor holds. Somehow not very serious.
  2. Serpet
    Serpet 17 May 2021 11: 30
    +12
    The military in the "Tiger" finally became disillusioned
    1. Devyatomayets
      Devyatomayets 17 May 2021 11: 35
      -6
      The declared protection against various mines and landmines is very high, the armored car can successfully survive the explosion of 6 kg of TNT under the bottom and any wheel.


      Well, at least they will finally not ride "on armor" like the last half a century.
      1. Sergey Aleksandrovich
        Sergey Aleksandrovich 17 May 2021 15: 05
        +2
        Riding the armor has several other reasons why it is not so easy to refuse it. For example, the air conditioner broke down and there was nothing to breathe in the Asian heat, or it was not installed in order to save money. But, perhaps most importantly, visibility is much better and easier to spot a shot made with a lead, from a grenade launcher or recoilless gun, stop in time and open return fire. And also, they like to fill the reserved space with mattresses, food rations, ammunition and ammunition.
        Below is a photo of the "Gusar" car, where the fighters are ready and are watching, although the UAZ also has windows.
      2. bk0010
        bk0010 17 May 2021 16: 11
        +1
        Quote: Devyatomayets
        Well, at least they will finally not ride "on armor" like the last half a century.
        If it is possible to climb up, they will.
    2. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 17 May 2021 11: 35
      +3
      He did his job. Replacement was asking for him. They will still remain, but gradually they will be completely withdrawn.
    3. Piramidon
      Piramidon 17 May 2021 11: 43
      +6
      Quote: Serpet
      The military in the "Tiger" finally became disillusioned

      They will be used where they used to drive UAZs.
  3. Vladimir_2U
    Vladimir_2U 17 May 2021 11: 43
    +1
    can operate autonomously for a long time, while providing sufficiently reliable protection for reconnaissance groups operating behind enemy lines.
    I may be behind the times, but what kind of secrecy of the RDG in this case can we talk about ?!
    1. Sergey Aleksandrovich
      Sergey Aleksandrovich 17 May 2021 14: 51
      0
      Everything is relative. At least, stealth is no worse than that of the BRDM-2, and clearly better than that of the BMP-2, which gives itself out with the clang of tracks per kilometer.
      1. Vladimir_2U
        Vladimir_2U 17 May 2021 16: 36
        +1
        Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
        Everything is relative. At least stealth is no worse than that of the BRDM-2
        You can compare the silhouette of the Bardak with this barn, and that's not counting the ability to swim.
        1. Sergey Aleksandrovich
          Sergey Aleksandrovich 17 May 2021 16: 42
          0
          This "barn" has a much larger capacity.
          1. Vladimir_2U
            Vladimir_2U 17 May 2021 17: 10
            +1
            Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
            This "barn" has a much larger capacity.

            Since when have spaciousness and secrecy become synonymous ?!
            1. Sergey Aleksandrovich
              Sergey Aleksandrovich 17 May 2021 17: 17
              0
              Well, to deliver a group of 18 people, you will need two Typhoons, but BRDMs may already need four or six pieces, a lot of stealth is evident. fellow
              Probably, after all, they meant greater stealth compared to tracked vehicles.
              1. Vladimir_2U
                Vladimir_2U 17 May 2021 17: 25
                +2
                Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
                Well, to deliver a group of 18 people, you will need two Typhoons, but BRDMs may already need four or six pieces, a lot of stealth is evident.
                Where to deliver that?

                while providing sufficiently reliable protection for reconnaissance groups, operating behind enemy lines.
                No, well, I understand in the desert against the barmaley without aerial reconnaissance means, such a "delivery" is quite effective, but against a more or less developed enemy, covert actions on armored cars, and even tied to bridges and fords, and why there, and to the roads, are impossible. They wrote nonsense about this in the article.
                1. Sergey Aleksandrovich
                  Sergey Aleksandrovich 17 May 2021 17: 30
                  +1
                  Where, where .., but at night in the rear to the spirits. I don’t know where. But, I like the car more than a weak BRDM, and it can also serve as a tractor.
              2. The comment was deleted.
              3. Konnick
                Konnick 18 May 2021 04: 43
                0
                Well, to deliver a group of 18 people, you will need two Typhoons, but BRDMs may already need four or six pieces.

                Eggs are not put in one basket ...
      2. Old tanker
        Old tanker 17 May 2021 17: 40
        +1
        Everything is relative. At least, stealth is no worse than that of the BRDM-2, and clearly better than that of the BMP-2, which gives itself out with the clang of tracks per kilometer.
        You are right, but ...
        These vehicles have never been in service with the special forces.
        And then there were heavy armored trucks in the special forces. Although the special forces both in their rear and to the front edge have to move on something. Moreover, now the defeat is being carried to the entire depth of the operational formation. And these cars are much better than the usual Ural or KamAZ. And better than riding an APC.
        1. Sergey Aleksandrovich
          Sergey Aleksandrovich 18 May 2021 14: 30
          0
          Of course, it was worth comparing with the armored personnel carrier, which has a higher cross-country ability, but it is also more expensive, and with other disadvantages such as poor visibility from under the armor.
          I like Typhoon-U even more, but made a choice in favor of Typhoon-K 4x4, most likely because of its lower price.
    2. Genry
      Genry 17 May 2021 15: 47
      0
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      I may be behind the times, but what kind of secrecy of the RDG in this case can we talk about ?!

      You just didn't think there were facts or literary embellishment.
      RDG on a military vehicle with a specific accessory? lol
      1. Vladimir_2U
        Vladimir_2U 17 May 2021 16: 40
        -1
        Quote: Genry
        You just didn't think there were facts or literary embellishment.

        And, so this is not an "information-analytical article" but a literary small form, well, who would have thought. laughing
        1. Genry
          Genry 17 May 2021 16: 42
          +1
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          And, so this is not an "information-analytical article" but a literary small form, well, who would have thought.

          I was trying to hint that your critical thinking is not critical enough.
          1. Vladimir_2U
            Vladimir_2U 17 May 2021 17: 13
            -1
            Quote: Genry
            I was trying to hint that your critical thinking is not critical enough.
            Those. if I was delighted with the article, in your opinion, it would show a higher level of my critical thinking?
            1. Genry
              Genry 17 May 2021 17: 16
              0
              Quote: Vladimir_2U
              Those. if I was delighted with the article, in your opinion, it would show a higher level of my critical thinking?

              No.
              Just ignore the nonsense added during copy-paste.
              And where have you seen analysts writing articles?
  4. Tuzik
    Tuzik 17 May 2021 11: 44
    -3
    16 tons and two axles, with no asphalt, like the Americans?
  5. Intruder
    Intruder 17 May 2021 11: 44
    -5
    The curb weight of the armored car reaches 14 kg, and the full weight -000 kg. Machine length - 16 mm. Width -000 mm. Height -6760 mm. The ground clearance is 2550 mm.
    but there is so much, you could immediately update the armored personnel carrier, build and fence !? And so are the Tigers and Shots of all sorts, and now the Typhoons are right, like a roaring stream from a horn of budget abundance wink .... military logistics is crying, looking at the total expansion of the range of necessary spare parts! wassat
    1. Sentinel-vs
      Sentinel-vs 17 May 2021 11: 56
      +3
      See shirshe, except for Tigers and Typhoons, nomenclature within the same + \ - category:
      1) Armored car KamAZ-43269 "Shot"


      2) Armored car SBA-60-K2 "Bulat"


      3) Protected modular car "Wolf"


      4) Armored car "Lynx"


      5) Multipurpose army vehicle "Vodnik"
      1. carstorm 11
        carstorm 11 17 May 2021 12: 00
        +7
        4 out of 5 MOs were not purchased serially and were not assembled. There may be 20 types of them, and even something in a small batch can be purchased for testing. But don't buy them in large quantities. In fact, there were 2 of them before the main ones. Lynx and Tiger. You will not prohibit proactive development of companies?)
      2. Intruder
        Intruder 17 May 2021 12: 04
        .
        See wider
        aha generals and military advisers on airbases to roll, with other especially close persons and at parades to show a dozen models !? And ordinary guys, nevertheless, with a different universal drive in their body, are fighting, like this:


        1. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 17 May 2021 12: 09
          +11
          You would at least look at what photos you insert ...
          1. Sentinel-vs
            Sentinel-vs 17 May 2021 12: 12
            +11
            1) Screenshot from the game
            2) Photos of Ukrainian punishers in Donbas
            3) Military divers of the USSR
            A selection however ...))
            1. Intruder
              Intruder 17 May 2021 12: 45
              .
              Photos of Ukrainian punishers in Donbas
              right and punitive, there is a sticker on the back, does not say anything ...!? Excited all sorts of minusators ... how stupid it is to react to different photos and not read the comments above ... point-blank not to see the point !?
              1. carstorm 11
                carstorm 11 17 May 2021 12: 51
                +2
                Just the same and the punishers. And don't care what they wear on their backs. Do you want to divide the scum in a variety-your business. Most will not bother with this. As for the meaning, you have already explained everything as far as I can. What kind of ordinary guys you have there are fighting on foot, I personally do not really understand. In Syria? Or else somewhere else in the database?) You have already been told with these pictures again-MO, most of what you show is not buying and was not going to do it.
        2. Guru
          Guru 17 May 2021 13: 44
          +2
          And ordinary guys, nevertheless, with a different universal drive in their body, are fighting, like this:
          The technique in the article is intended for the Russian army - this is the first, and for the Dill there is already its own.



          So envy in silence laughing
      3. Devyatomayets
        Devyatomayets 17 May 2021 12: 26
        -4
        The first three were not purchased.
        Lynx - Italian drank by Taburetkin.
        At first, the vodnik in homeopathic quantities knocked about in the commandant's office of the Strategic Missile Forces, now they have been poured into Syria for scrap.
        1. loki565
          loki565 17 May 2021 14: 25
          +4
          Lynx - Italian drank by Taburetkin.

          Another stupid cliché, without the Lynx there would have been no Typhoon K when they learned that an armored car can withstand more than 300g of explosives)))
      4. Sergey Aleksandrovich
        Sergey Aleksandrovich 17 May 2021 13: 36
        0
        The armored car "Shot", it seems, was ruined by the absence of a sun visor, it is already observed on the Typhoon. laughing
    2. Sentinel-vs
      Sentinel-vs 17 May 2021 11: 59
      +2
      6) Armored car "Scorpion"


      7) Car "Hussar"
      1. Intruder
        Intruder 17 May 2021 12: 09
        -7
        Scorpio, Hussar and others ...
        for poor warriors, here is beauty and pride, the most protected for one, maximum two ... former scouts:
        1. Free wind
          Free wind 17 May 2021 12: 34
          -7
          For one not smart brow. imagining himself to be a god.
  6. Intruder
    Intruder 17 May 2021 11: 50
    .
    the armored car has powerful armor protection capable of withstanding bullets from a Kalashnikov assault rifle or an SVD sniper rifle
    Well, well ... just like this and powerful ... this monster of gloomy armored vehicles in the Russian Federation is looked at by cheap Barmaley and not only gantrucks, which he can easily encounter on special operations, by the way:




    1. Guru
      Guru 17 May 2021 13: 49
      +5
      Well, well ... just like that and powerful ... on this monster of a gloomy armored car in the Russian Federation
      But where does he care about yours;


      Right there just POWER - Armata on the sidelines nervously smokes laughing
      1. Intruder
        Intruder 17 May 2021 14: 17
        -2
        But where does he care about yours?
        They didn't guess, I was born in the Soviet Union and did not have a passport in this life, from the word GENERAL ... therefore not yours and not ours ... laughing wink
        1. Devyatomayets
          Devyatomayets 17 May 2021 17: 27
          -2
          Quote: Intruder
          But where does he care about yours?
          They didn't guess, I was born in the Soviet Union and did not have a passport in this life, from the word GENERAL ... therefore not yours and not ours ... laughing wink


          Everyone who tries to search and analyze information about modern Russian armored vehicles, instead of screaming "Uryayayaya" from the couch in a fountain of saliva, proclaiming the absence of analogs in the world, immediately, in retrospect, leave the Russians and join the Ukrobenderovites. Isn't it clear wassat
          1. Intruder
            Intruder 17 May 2021 17: 32
            +1
            resign from the Russians and enroll in the Ukrobenderovites.
            is it such a syndrome or ...!? So I am not ethnic Russian, so what ... from this ... and the ancestors are also not Russian !!! negative Now cry and drink vodka, with Moscow sausage ??? good
  7. Ros 56
    Ros 56 17 May 2021 13: 16
    +2
    The tramp is strong. good
    1. Sergey Aleksandrovich
      Sergey Aleksandrovich 17 May 2021 13: 32
      0
      An automatic grenade launcher is missing in the bargain.
      1. Genry
        Genry 17 May 2021 15: 21
        +1
        Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
        An automatic grenade launcher is missing in the bargain.

        It seems to be.
        1. Sergey Aleksandrovich
          Sergey Aleksandrovich 17 May 2021 15: 37
          0
          Thanks for the clarification. And how to take revenge on an ambushed or hiding enemy, a machine gun, albeit a large-caliber one, may not be enough.
        2. Intruder
          Intruder 17 May 2021 17: 39
          +1
          It seems to be.
          Hmm, there is something, but who guessed the barrel casing to the outside of the muzzle of the barrel bore to be tacked by spot welding, other methods were clearly not found, as well as the fastening of the armored packages of the side windows and the wrinkled stamping of the fuel tank, right across the entire surface ... dents, handicraft of the 21st century, however !? No.
          1. Genry
            Genry 17 May 2021 17: 50
            +1
            Quote: Intruder
            but who guessed the barrel casing to the outside of the muzzle of the barrel bore to tack with spot welding

            Where did you see the welding?

            Quote: Intruder
            crumpled stamping of the fuel tank, right across the entire surface ... there are dents

            This is not a commercial sample from the assembly line.
            Apparently, they took to the exhibition a tinted-podrikhtovanny one of those experimental that after testing ...
            1. Intruder
              Intruder 17 May 2021 18: 10
              +2
              Where did you see the welding?
              Everywhere... winked starting from 0:14, right at the muzzle, if you look and pause to slow down the frames and then, when the operator removes the armored packages, you can also see the welding points there, although the entire side is simply replete with screws, even a crowbar / shovel / ax, etc. bolted by them at the points of attachment meant, but here only welding and without screws and bolts ... lol !
              1. Genry
                Genry 17 May 2021 18: 35
                -1
                Quote: Intruder
                starting at 0:14, right at the muzzle, when viewed and paused

                I inserted a picture. What's missing?
                Quote: Intruder
                Oh, there is, an exhibition sample (without dents), was no longer available or was saving on one such, in general !?

                Papier-mâché?
                Normal people understand everything here - military equipment - and you have nagging. Maybe the scrap is crooked and dull for you? And why a log with knots?
            2. Intruder
              Intruder 17 May 2021 18: 12
              +1
              Apparently, they took to the exhibition a tinted-podrikhtovanny one of those experimental that after testing ...
              that is, the exhibition sample (without dents) was no longer available or was saving on one such, in general !? winked
  8. Maxwrx
    Maxwrx 18 May 2021 12: 42
    0
    The main problem of the Tiger is the inability to make a intelligible mine protection, first of all, the v-shaped bottom. And so in all respects, the machine is worthy, and most importantly cheap!
    Example. an armored Humvee cost 250 thousand in 2019, an Oshkosh L-ATV that replaced it costs 400 thousand, although the functionality is the same.
  9. petr.tchetyrkin
    petr.tchetyrkin 18 May 2021 19: 04
    0
    I, something I do not understand the train of thought of the leadership of the RF Airborne Forces, why do reconnaissance groups need a multi-ton monster on wheels for 10 fighters without the ability to swim with a bandura on the hull / doom / - the crew of an armored personnel carrier, scouts or watchmen. It is not easier to use a jeep, bugs or even a bmd, but with improved reconnaissance and fire damage. The main thing in the DRG is stealth and mobility, not the mass of a bulletproof coffin. Or again it blew with a victorious throw on the autobahns of Europe.