Army special forces will be equipped with armored vehicles "Typhoon" K-53949 4x4

49

Separate special forces companies of the combined-arms armies will receive the Typhoon K-53949 4x4 armored vehicle for equipping.

As reported "News" With reference to sources in the Ministry of Defense, the corresponding decision has already been made.



The Ministry of Defense has decided to equip the spetsnaz companies, which are being created in the combined-arms armies, with Typhoon-K armored vehicles, also called Typhoonok. According to the military, it is these armored vehicles, not the Tigers, that can operate autonomously for a long time, while providing sufficiently reliable protection for reconnaissance groups operating behind enemy lines.

Compared to the Tiger, the Typhoon K-53949 is a heavier vehicle. The curb weight of the armored car reaches 14 kg, and the full -000 kg. Machine length - 16 mm. Width -000 mm. Height -6760 mm. The ground clearance is 2550 mm. A diesel six-cylinder engine with a capacity of 2840 hp is installed. The maximum speed on the highway is 433 km / h. Cruising range up to 350 km. Capacity - 105 people.

In the reconnaissance version, the armored car can be armed with a remote-controlled combat module with a 12,7-mm machine gun.

The two-axle armored car has powerful armor protection capable of withstanding bullets from a Kalashnikov assault rifle or an SVD sniper rifle. The declared protection against various mines and landmines is very high, the armored car can successfully survive the explosion of 6 kg of TNT under the bottom and any wheel. Tires tubeless with mine insert, with adjustable air pressure.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    49 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +4
      17 May 2021 11: 26
      serious car
      1. 0
        17 May 2021 11: 37
        According to the description, it seems like yes, seriously. As in the case will be. Again, armor protection only from 7.62 bullets is not enough?
        1. +14
          17 May 2021 11: 41
          Quote: ssergey1978
          Again, armor protection only from 7.62 bullets is not enough?

          It's not a tank. Protection like in an armored personnel carrier
        2. +7
          17 May 2021 11: 45
          but mine protection, as the military says, is an order of magnitude better than that of the tiger, a remotely controlled weapon station, and this is now more important, the same patrolling in Syria is easier to carry out.
      2. +3
        17 May 2021 16: 09
        Quote: swnvaleria
        serious car
        16 tons of weight, cannot swim, but only 7.62 armor holds. Somehow not very serious.
    2. +12
      17 May 2021 11: 30
      The military in the "Tiger" finally became disillusioned
      1. -6
        17 May 2021 11: 35
        The declared protection against various mines and landmines is very high, the armored car can successfully survive the explosion of 6 kg of TNT under the bottom and any wheel.


        Well, at least they will finally not ride "on armor" like the last half a century.
        1. +2
          17 May 2021 15: 05
          Riding the armor has several other reasons why it is not so easy to refuse it. For example, the air conditioner broke down and there was nothing to breathe in the Asian heat, or it was not installed in order to save money. But, perhaps most importantly, visibility is much better and easier to spot a shot made with a lead, from a grenade launcher or recoilless gun, stop in time and open return fire. And also, they like to fill the reserved space with mattresses, food rations, ammunition and ammunition.
          Below is a photo of the "Gusar" car, where the fighters are ready and are watching, although the UAZ also has windows.
        2. +1
          17 May 2021 16: 11
          Quote: Devyatomayets
          Well, at least they will finally not ride "on armor" like the last half a century.
          If it is possible to climb up, they will.
      2. +3
        17 May 2021 11: 35
        He did his job. Replacement was asking for him. They will still remain, but gradually they will be completely withdrawn.
      3. +6
        17 May 2021 11: 43
        Quote: Serpet
        The military in the "Tiger" finally became disillusioned

        They will be used where they used to drive UAZs.
    3. +1
      17 May 2021 11: 43
      can operate autonomously for a long time, while providing sufficiently reliable protection for reconnaissance groups operating behind enemy lines.
      I may be behind the times, but what kind of secrecy of the RDG in this case can we talk about ?!
      1. 0
        17 May 2021 14: 51
        Everything is relative. At least, stealth is no worse than that of the BRDM-2, and clearly better than that of the BMP-2, which gives itself out with the clang of tracks per kilometer.
        1. +1
          17 May 2021 16: 36
          Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
          Everything is relative. At least stealth is no worse than that of the BRDM-2
          You can compare the silhouette of the Bardak with this barn, and that's not counting the ability to swim.
          1. 0
            17 May 2021 16: 42
            This "barn" has a much larger capacity.
            1. +1
              17 May 2021 17: 10
              Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
              This "barn" has a much larger capacity.

              Since when have spaciousness and secrecy become synonymous ?!
              1. 0
                17 May 2021 17: 17
                Well, to deliver a group of 18 people, you will need two Typhoons, but BRDMs may already need four or six pieces, a lot of stealth is evident. fellow
                Probably, after all, they meant greater stealth compared to tracked vehicles.
                1. +2
                  17 May 2021 17: 25
                  Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
                  Well, to deliver a group of 18 people, you will need two Typhoons, but BRDMs may already need four or six pieces, a lot of stealth is evident.
                  Where to deliver that?

                  while providing sufficiently reliable protection for reconnaissance groups, operating behind enemy lines.
                  No, well, I understand in the desert against the barmaley without aerial reconnaissance means, such a "delivery" is quite effective, but against a more or less developed enemy, covert actions on armored cars, and even tied to bridges and fords, and why there, and to the roads, are impossible. They wrote nonsense about this in the article.
                  1. +1
                    17 May 2021 17: 30
                    Where, where .., but at night in the rear to the spirits. I don’t know where. But, I like the car more than a weak BRDM, and it can also serve as a tractor.
                2. The comment was deleted.
                3. 0
                  18 May 2021 04: 43
                  Well, to deliver a group of 18 people, you will need two Typhoons, but BRDMs may already need four or six pieces.

                  Eggs are not put in one basket ...
        2. +1
          17 May 2021 17: 40
          Everything is relative. At least, stealth is no worse than that of the BRDM-2, and clearly better than that of the BMP-2, which gives itself out with the clang of tracks per kilometer.
          You are right, but ...
          These vehicles have never been in service with the special forces.
          And then there were heavy armored trucks in the special forces. Although the special forces both in their rear and to the front edge have to move on something. Moreover, now the defeat is being carried to the entire depth of the operational formation. And these cars are much better than the usual Ural or KamAZ. And better than riding an APC.
          1. 0
            18 May 2021 14: 30
            Of course, it was worth comparing with the armored personnel carrier, which has a higher cross-country ability, but it is also more expensive, and with other disadvantages such as poor visibility from under the armor.
            I like Typhoon-U even more, but made a choice in favor of Typhoon-K 4x4, most likely because of its lower price.
      2. 0
        17 May 2021 15: 47
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        I may be behind the times, but what kind of secrecy of the RDG in this case can we talk about ?!

        You just didn't think there were facts or literary embellishment.
        RDG on a military vehicle with a specific accessory? lol
        1. -1
          17 May 2021 16: 40
          Quote: Genry
          You just didn't think there were facts or literary embellishment.

          And, so this is not an "information-analytical article" but a literary small form, well, who would have thought. laughing
          1. +1
            17 May 2021 16: 42
            Quote: Vladimir_2U
            And, so this is not an "information-analytical article" but a literary small form, well, who would have thought.

            I was trying to hint that your critical thinking is not critical enough.
            1. -1
              17 May 2021 17: 13
              Quote: Genry
              I was trying to hint that your critical thinking is not critical enough.
              Those. if I was delighted with the article, in your opinion, it would show a higher level of my critical thinking?
              1. 0
                17 May 2021 17: 16
                Quote: Vladimir_2U
                Those. if I was delighted with the article, in your opinion, it would show a higher level of my critical thinking?

                No.
                Just ignore the nonsense added during copy-paste.
                And where have you seen analysts writing articles?
    4. -3
      17 May 2021 11: 44
      16 tons and two axles, with no asphalt, like the Americans?
    5. +2
      17 May 2021 13: 16
      The tramp is strong. good
      1. 0
        17 May 2021 13: 32
        An automatic grenade launcher is missing in the bargain.
        1. +1
          17 May 2021 15: 21
          Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
          An automatic grenade launcher is missing in the bargain.

          It seems to be.
          1. 0
            17 May 2021 15: 37
            Thanks for the clarification. And how to take revenge on an ambushed or hiding enemy, a machine gun, albeit a large-caliber one, may not be enough.
    6. 0
      18 May 2021 12: 42
      The main problem of the Tiger is the inability to make a intelligible mine protection, first of all, the v-shaped bottom. And so in all respects, the machine is worthy, and most importantly cheap!
      Example. an armored Humvee cost 250 thousand in 2019, an Oshkosh L-ATV that replaced it costs 400 thousand, although the functionality is the same.
    7. 0
      18 May 2021 19: 04
      I, something I do not understand the train of thought of the leadership of the RF Airborne Forces, why do reconnaissance groups need a multi-ton monster on wheels for 10 fighters without the ability to swim with a bandura on the hull / doom / - the crew of an armored personnel carrier, scouts or watchmen. It is not easier to use a jeep, bugs or even a bmd, but with improved reconnaissance and fire damage. The main thing in the DRG is stealth and mobility, not the mass of a bulletproof coffin. Or again it blew with a victorious throw on the autobahns of Europe.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"