US press: Washington fears that China and Russia will gain control of the country after leaving Afghanistan

27

Afghanistan will face increased instability after the withdrawal of the American military contingent, which, in turn, could lead to the establishment of dominance there by Russia and China. However, there is a way to prevent this, I am sure the author of the article published in the American edition of The Hill.

The Americans are withdrawing their troops from Afghanistan, which is likely to lead to clashes between government forces and the Taliban terrorist movement * (* banned in Russia). The situation that has arisen can be used by Russia and China, which will try to establish their dominance there, finally ousting the United States from the region.

This is absolutely impossible to allow, the author claims. As an alternative to resolve the situation in Afghanistan, he proposes to use Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, which, under the leadership, of course, the United States, should become the most important economic partners for Kabul.



In general, according to the author of the article, the Central Asian countries should play a key role in the implementation of efforts to achieve a settlement in Afghanistan within the framework of the US State Department's C5 + 1 initiative, where "C5" means Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Turkmenistan, and "+ 1 "- USA. It is this "six" that should bring the Afghans the peace and prosperity that the United States has tried to bring to this country for 20 years.

The author emphasizes that all initiatives will be implemented only with the leadership of the Americans. It is then that it will be possible to neutralize the influence on Afghanistan of Russia, China, and, of course, Iran, which, together or separately, want, as the author claims, to deprive Afghanistan of independence, draw it into military agreements, entangle it with debts and generally turn it into an "anti-American initiative." ...
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    27 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +11
      12 May 2021 17: 34
      Then don't leave there for another twelve years.
      1. +3
        12 May 2021 17: 40
        Quote: NF68
        Then don't leave there for another twelve years.

        Great recommendation!
        1. +2
          12 May 2021 18: 57
          Let them not go away.
          And over Afghanistan ... control will ... Afghanistan.
          Paradox.))
          1. +6
            12 May 2021 23: 33
            Quote: hirurg
            Let them not go away.
            And over Afghanistan ... control will ... Afghanistan.
            Paradox.))

            I don’t know about the "six", but +1 is essentially zeroed out.
          2. +5
            12 May 2021 23: 37
            Quote: hirurg
            Let them not go away.
            And over Afghanistan ... control will ... Afghanistan.
            Paradox.))

            They would not miss, in the near future, control over three opposing forces in the United States: black, white and Latinos. winked
            Oh, and there will be a mess.
    2. +4
      12 May 2021 17: 37
      Yeah, seize the rabble of appanage principalities and make a country. Who hasn't tried it yet? Moreover, the principalities isolated by the absence of railways, simply roads and mountains. There Kabul is just for show - there should be a "capital".
      1. 0
        12 May 2021 17: 47
        The article says - China has not tried it yet wassat
      2. 0
        12 May 2021 17: 53
        Quote: dauria
        Yeah, seize the rabble of appanage principalities and make a country

        Taking into account the listed countries of Central Asia, which together with the United States should bring "prosperity" to Afghanistan, it is more likely that these countries will simply share this space and find a common language with the locals without the United States.
    3. +1
      12 May 2021 17: 40
      Uncle jokingly writes))) clashes between government troops and the Taliban))) wherever the mattress mats and their sixes left, the Taliban have already thrown out their henchmen. Najibula lasted even longer.
    4. +1
      12 May 2021 17: 48
      Laughter and more.
    5. 0
      12 May 2021 17: 48
      Washington fears that after leaving Afghanistan, China and Russia will gain control over the country
      Well, a priori, there are no independent small states in the World laughing The Yankees declare this clearly.
    6. 0
      12 May 2021 17: 49
      dk is clear we will get the stump! the main thing is that the United States from there dumped!
    7. +1
      12 May 2021 17: 51
      I doubt that the Amers will leave. The Taliban will bribe them to go to Tajikistan, etc. rushed No wonder Rakhmonov was with Putin at the Parade. hi
      Everything interesting is yet to come, and Russia needs to be on the lookout.
      1. +1
        12 May 2021 18: 02
        Yes, the east is a delicate matter, an eye and an eye behind them.
    8. 0
      12 May 2021 17: 56
      An incessant search for "cannon fodder".
    9. +1
      12 May 2021 17: 58
      US press: Washington fears that China and Russia will gain control of the country after leaving Afghanistan

      Do they care? belay
      Or to be afraid that there will be no more access to the "weed", you will not go to the barn? negative
      1. 0
        12 May 2021 21: 01
        Quote: K-50
        US press: Washington fears that China and Russia will gain control of the country after leaving Afghanistan

        Do they care? belay
        Or to be afraid that there will be no more access to the "weed", you will not go to the barn? negative

        I think that the proceeds from the drug trade are the main obstacle to the US withdrawal from Afghanistan. And the Americans are so greedy that they are trying to squeeze out everything for themselves, down to the last dollar. Therefore, the war does not end.
    10. 0
      12 May 2021 18: 05
      So far no one has been able to take over Afghanistan
      1. 0
        12 May 2021 18: 20
        Quote: abror
        So far no one has been able to take over Afghanistan

        So yes, but it is constantly passed from hand to hand .. In fact, there is no state as such, there are no tribes .. Here again the "power" will soon change .. And the war is going on forever there. It is also impossible to push them alone, Tons of drugs are produced and distributed all over the world .. This is the main problem!
        Russia has long suggested spraying poppy fields in Afghanistan, a harmless chemical, but effective, but the Amers balked, as if the people would die of hunger, etc.
        Well, you understand me ..
      2. 0
        13 May 2021 06: 03
        Quote: abror
        So far no one has been able to take over Afghanistan

        But it seems to me that he is the other way around - always under someone's occupation - the British, Russians, Americans, etc.
    11. +1
      12 May 2021 18: 30
      Quote: abror
      So far no one has been able to take over Afghanistan


      You can also say the exact opposite, that Afghanistan has been invaded by everyone, from the Greeks (for a long time) to the Georgians (recently). Nobody found any benefit in this.
      1. 0
        13 May 2021 09: 44
        Quote: Humpty
        Quote: abror
        So far no one has been able to take over Afghanistan



        You can also say the exact opposite, that Afghanistan has been invaded by everyone, from the Greeks (for a long time) to the Georgians (recently). Nobody found any benefit in this.


        But no one could establish their power, the USSR left, the USA is now like 2001,
        the turn of China has come, I think they will lose like all the previous ones.
        1. 0
          13 May 2021 16: 31
          Quote: abror
          it's the turn of China, I think they will lose like all the previous ones

          I do not think that the Chinese will go there in the foreseeable future.
    12. +1
      12 May 2021 22: 39
      The author emphasizes that all initiatives will be implemented only with the leadership of the Americans.

      Aha, aha, under such a "leader" Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Turkmenistan will repeat the path of Afghanistan together!
    13. -1
      13 May 2021 03: 28
      Quote: NF68
      Then don't leave there for another twelve years.

      Let them sit there for life. The main thing is to put more money in there laughing
    14. 0
      13 May 2021 13: 25
      Yeah, but the five are now not at all in the sphere of influence of Russia and China. From the beginning, you need to throw them out of Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, etc. remove our bases and cancel their external debt to China and Russia. Business then ..... this author
    15. 0
      13 May 2021 13: 35
      According to the author, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan should become trans-shipment points for drugs from Afghanistan, which is now cultivated by the US Armed Forces, that is, burgerwaffe. And if burgers from Afgan come out, the drug traffic will drop hundreds of times, since drug traffickers are not respected either in Russia or in China. These are the intolerant countries.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"