Military Review

TAKR "Admiral Kuznetsov" can get a new shipborne navigation and landing complex

58

The only Russian aircraft-carrying cruiser, Admiral Kuznetsov, undergoing repairs and modernization, may receive a new shipborne automated complex for short-range navigation and flight and landing control. It is reported by TASS with reference to a source in the DIC.


In the course of modernization, "Admiral Kuznetsov" will receive a new one, an analogue of the "Resistor-E" complex, developed for Indian aircraft carriers, instead of the old "Resistor-K42" complex. Everything would be fine, but according to the source, the new complex has not yet passed full-scale tests.

According to reports, a new short-range navigation and flight and landing control complex was delivered to Yeisk, but due to the unavailability of the entire complex as a whole, it did not pass full-fledged tests. At the same time, the untested complex is being prepared for installation on a Russian aircraft carrier.

News The agency does not explain which complex it is specifically about, but the website of the developer of these complexes of the Chelyabinsk NIIIT-RK contains information about the new generation B-16 complex, just an analogue of the Resistor-E, created specifically for the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier. According to the developer, a dispatching radar with a new active ring phased antenna array was additionally introduced into the complex.

It is noted that the V-16 complex has been manufactured and has already been delivered in a ground version just for equipping the NITKA complex in the city of Yeisk. No test information available.
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. novel66
    novel66 11 May 2021 08: 50
    -7
    will kill, fuck, "Kuznetsov"
    1. Doccor18
      Doccor18 11 May 2021 08: 54
      -5
      Quote: novel xnumx
      will kill, fuck, "Kuznetsov"

      I do not believe! It can't be!
      For then they will kill all the aircraft carrier pride of the Navy ...
      1. novel66
        novel66 11 May 2021 09: 10
        -6
        oh, pride ..
        1. Doccor18
          Doccor18 11 May 2021 09: 22
          0
          It depends...
          Some argue that we do not need a fleet at all, "waste", "we will throw warheads at everyone, if that ..."
          1. novel66
            novel66 11 May 2021 09: 23
            -1
            you need to protect your shores ... and displaying the flag is a stupid idea
            1. Doccor18
              Doccor18 11 May 2021 09: 40
              0
              Quote: novel xnumx
              you need to protect your shores ...
              Naturally.

              Quote: novel xnumx
              and showing the flag is a stupid idea

              A pair of multi-role fighter squadrons aboard the ship, and 1000 km. from the coast, is also capable of a lot, and not only show the flag ...
              1. novel66
                novel66 11 May 2021 09: 46
                -3
                Eunwoo tell it, I can even imagine the reaction
                1. Doccor18
                  Doccor18 11 May 2021 09: 57
                  +1
                  Quote: novel xnumx
                  Tell Eunwoo ...

                  We are not the DPRK ...
                  And do you seriously think that the United States would not have been able to cope with the Korean army, with a special desire?
                  1. novel66
                    novel66 11 May 2021 09: 58
                    -2
                    they have a term - unacceptable losses ... it's not us - until the last soldier ... that's where the Usovites got shit
                    1. Doccor18
                      Doccor18 11 May 2021 10: 14
                      -1
                      Quote: novel xnumx
                      they have a term - unacceptable losses ...
                      for sure, and there is no purpose to justify these losses.
                  2. Ross xnumx
                    Ross xnumx 11 May 2021 10: 20
                    -1
                    Quote: Doccor18
                    And do you seriously think that the United States would not have been able to cope with the Korean army, with a special desire?

                    If you are over 60, please answer (if you are younger, you can ignore it): “Do you think that the USA won the WWII? Was it the United States that forced Japan to surrender? Has the USA bent over Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan? "
                    Of all the K °, on which the United States could rely, not a single country (Japan, South Korea) would want to receive a nuclear bomb from Nn on its territory, and they are not ready for an open confrontation.
                    Among other things, thanks to the warm "friendship" with Russia and China, these countries may "do not want kipish" near their borders.
                    And by this, the war between the United States and the DPRK is postponed indefinitely. And there is (and this does not accept objections):
                    Quote: novel xnumx
                    they have a term - unacceptable losses ...

                    good
                    1. Doccor18
                      Doccor18 11 May 2021 10: 38
                      +3
                      Quote: ROSS 42
                      If you are over 60, then please answer .... “Do you think that the USA won the WWII? Was it the United States that forced Japan to surrender? Has the USA bent over Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan? "

                      Interesting age limits ...
                      That is, those who are under 60 are swimming in these matters? Or are they wrong about everything?
                      The United States gained a lot of advantages from WWII, while others killed each other, the Americans profited from everyone ...
                      With Vietnam, it did not work out only because the USSR helped significantly. Without the USSR (specialists and technology), Vietnam would have faced an unenviable fate ... The DPRK is not bombed, in my opinion, not even so much because of the presence of nuclear weapons, but because it will not work as well as in Iraq, Libya and Yugoslavia , arrange internecine fuss and bribe / intimidate local "princelings". Patriotism in the DPRK is not ostentatious, but real (which is now a rarity in the world), and therefore, in the event of a hot phase, it will be necessary to grind the entire population of this small but proud country. And not a single politician in the world will agree to this. The example of Corporal Schicklgruber is indicative ...
            2. bayard
              bayard 11 May 2021 09: 51
              +3
              Quote: novel xnumx
              you need to protect your shores.

              So they keep him on the Northern Fleet for this - the air defense / anti-aircraft defense line taken out. And what else is there to drive enemy anti-submarine aircraft?
              If you fly from the shore, then you will never have time ... unless only to take revenge ...
              1. novel66
                novel66 11 May 2021 09: 56
                -3
                ideally - by patrol aircraft and MPK BOD, how will the PLO avik help? yes, and air defense ... without AWACS one laugh
                1. bayard
                  bayard 11 May 2021 10: 57
                  +4
                  Quote: novel xnumx
                  ideally - by patrol planes and BOD MPK

                  How can patrol aircraft fight enemy ASW aircraft?
                  Moreover, what can BOD do with them?
                  From his then SAM?
                  After all, the main threat to our submarines is from the submarine planes.
                  But these very aircraft (PLO) carry not only special equipment for searching for submarines, depth charges buoys, but also the Harpoon anti-ship missile system ...
                  And what will they do with these missiles with our BOD? They have air defense systems for 12 - 15 km. hits?
                  Correctly . yes
                  They will do what they want.
                  From a safe distance for yourself.
                  And then they will deal with our submarines.

                  Quote: novel xnumx
                  yes, and air defense ... without AWACS one laugh

                  But what about our famous AWACS helicopters? Which we supplied both China and India in quite marketable quantities?
                  Do we have such?
                  There is .
                  Not much, but there is. And they are based on "Kuznetsov".
                  And their capabilities for aiming not only at PLO aircraft, but also for detecting and targeting fighters at low-flying anti-ship missiles are enough.
                  No laughing - that's enough.
                  And there, looking and the Yak-44 will rise from oblivion for future ... aircraft carriers ...
                  After all, the Guarantor of the Constitution and concurrently the Supreme Commander-in-Chief spoke so mysteriously ... at the tab of two UDCs in Kerch ... that they were going to lay next.
                  He spoke carefully.
                  We generally like to talk.
                  1. novel66
                    novel66 11 May 2021 11: 09
                    0
                    removed air defense / PLO line

                    PLO - anti-submarine defense or am I confusing something?
                    1. bayard
                      bayard 11 May 2021 11: 37
                      0
                      "Admiral Kuznetsov" is not only a carrier of combat fighters and AWACS helicopters, but also up to a squadron of PLO helicopters. Which create this very
                      Quote: novel xnumx
                      removed air defense / PLO line

                      To cover the area of ​​combat deployment of our SSBNs, the very same set of tools:
                      - fighters accelerate anti-submarine and reconnaissance aircraft, carry out air defense in the far zone,
                      - PLO helicopters take control of the water area, identifying and destroying (in wartime) enemy submarines.
                      And next to it is a flock of frigates and BODs as part of a warrant.
                      And a cruiser with a long-range air defense missile system and heavy anti-ship missiles.
                      After all, beauty is it?
                      And everything is already there, the modernization with repairs to finish only "Kuze".
                      1. novel66
                        novel66 11 May 2021 20: 45
                        +1
                        And next to a flock of frigates and BODs as part of the order

                        is it really there?
                      2. bayard
                        bayard 11 May 2021 21: 55
                        0
                        There are two frigates of project 22350.
                        Today there are two combat-ready APCs of pr. 1155.
                        Missile cruiser "Ustinov" - yes.
                        Several MAPLs pr 971 are available.
                        Besides :
                        - one BOD 1155 was spent on modernization (after which it will have 32 CD in 4 UKSK, 16 anti-ship missiles X-35, air defense systems "Shtil" and "Packet-NK"), the modernization will take 3-4 years,
                        - one destroyer of the "Sarych" type went into repair with the replacement of boilers, the repair of the power plant and the renewal of weapons,
                        - missile cruiser "Admiral Nakhimov" will come out of modernization no later than "Admiral Kuznetsov" becomes operational - 2023 - 2024. ,
                        - over these 2 - 3 years (before the Kuznetsov is commissioned and operational readiness), at least two more frigates 22350 will enter service, then two frigates each year.
                        So there is something on the Northern Fleet today, and by 2024 there will be even more (at least two frigates).
                        New "Yaseni-M" and 971 ave. From the modernization - will also be.
                        But about ... you can love absolutely EVERYTHING. And we are not immune from such a fate either. Alas.
                        -
              2. Alexey RA
                Alexey RA 11 May 2021 19: 21
                0
                Quote: novel xnumx
                ideally - by patrol aircraft and MPK BOD, how will Avik PLO help?

                It will cover the BOD with the MPK from the air and will allow to move the ASW line further than 400 km from the nearest airfield.
                Because there is no hope for shipborne air defense systems - everything rests on the radio horizon.
                Quote: novel xnumx
                yes, and air defense ... without AWACS one laugh

                On bezrybe and Ka-31 - AWACS. sad
                1. novel66
                  novel66 11 May 2021 20: 44
                  +1
                  On bezrybe and Ka-31 - AWACS
                  well, at least not an air kite
    2. antivirus
      antivirus 11 May 2021 09: 16
      -6
      Does the Navy have pride? or just to reach the pension?
      1. Doccor18
        Doccor18 11 May 2021 09: 20
        +3
        Quote: antivirus
        Does the Navy have pride?

        Was, is and will be!
        But not everyone understands.
        1. antivirus
          antivirus 11 May 2021 11: 06
          -5
          or not explain why there was no acre show-off.
          Ushakov and Kornilov are our everything, and the entire 20th century ... the fleet was sailing.
          tradition is a real deal. ... if you make money, and not invent ==== that's why submariners rule the Navy
  2. Piramidon
    Piramidon 11 May 2021 09: 12
    -5
    As a combat unit, it is no longer worth much.
    1. Vladimir_2U
      Vladimir_2U 11 May 2021 09: 14
      +7
      Quote: Piramidon
      As a combat unit, it is no longer worth much.

      And without aircraft, aircraft carriers are generally trough troughs, is not it?
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 11 May 2021 09: 31
        0
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        And without aircraft, aircraft carriers are generally trough

        And without an escort, too.
        1. Vladimir_2U
          Vladimir_2U 11 May 2021 09: 33
          +1
          Quote: Piramidon
          And without aircraft, aircraft carriers are generally trough

          And without an escort, too.


          Doesn't the Navy have NKs and submarines at all? I think there will be.
          1. Piramidon
            Piramidon 11 May 2021 10: 12
            -3
            Quote: Vladimir_2U
            Doesn't the Navy have NKs and submarines at all? I think there will be.

            If you strip the Northern Fleet and give everything to accompany the "Kuza" with its dubious combat effectiveness ...
        2. novel66
          novel66 11 May 2021 09: 56
          0
          but don't be sick!
        3. Revolver
          Revolver 11 May 2021 10: 09
          +1
          Quote: Piramidon
          And without an escort, too.

          Well, like one "Orlan" or at least "Atlant", pieces of 4 frigates and a multipurpose submarine. This is a minimum, but if you scrape across all fleets, it will be typed. Well, a tanker, a cargo ship, and a tug, of course, are not combat units, but without them there is no way. So you get AUG. One. Moreover, "Kuznetsov" and not close to "Nimitz", and frigates and near the EM class "Arleigh Burke" did not stand. And on the good, to this add a couple of EMs, which, alas, either no longer exist, or have not yet begun to build. Of course, "Orlan" will somewhat balance the balance of power, but still I would bet money on "Nimitz". If only because it has more planes, and there are AWACS planes that will spot the enemy earlier. And as a rule, there are more ships in escort than the Navy will be able to allocate to Kuznetsova.
          1. novel66
            novel66 11 May 2021 10: 40
            +2
            there are AWACS aircraft that will detect the enemy earlier

            that's it
          2. bayard
            bayard 11 May 2021 11: 25
            +1
            From warships to escort to "Kuznetsov", two BOD 1155 and two frigates 22350 + cruiser are enough. Moreover, the cruiser "Ustinov" will be quite sufficient.
            And the SF will not become scarce, and will not lose weight from the allocation of such an escort.
            And from the raid of the air wing of one "Nimitz" such AUG will fight off.
            And with a return volley it will sink it. Moreover, it is guaranteed - 16 heavy anti-ship missiles "Vulkan" \ "Granite" + 32 \ 96 anti-ship missiles "Onyx" \ "Zircon", this will be provided with a margin.
            I would have shoved Zircons or Onyxes into the Kuznetsov silos, three in each. For + 2 additional aircraft in the hangar, this is still not 30 - 36 anti-ship missiles. Moreover, they are already provided there.
            And "Admiral Kuznetsov" is bad not because it is, but because it is still not ready for combat.
            1. Vladimir1155
              Vladimir1155 11 May 2021 15: 56
              0
              Quote: bayard
              And the SF will not become scarce, and will not lose weight from the allocation of such an escort

              well, of course ....... so far what you have listed is the entire fleet, and how are we going to protect our cities from submarines? and even more so two BODs and one two cruisers, this is unreliable, this is not an escort, but a profanation
              1. bayard
                bayard 11 May 2021 16: 47
                0
                Once again, we consider carefully:
                - Two BODs (if these BODs are after modernization, they will have 32 launchers in 4 UKSK and 16 anti-ship missiles X-35 + 2 PLO helicopters).
                - Two frigates of pr. 22350 (they also have a good GAC, a PLO helicopter and torpedoes, and 16 CR in 2 UKSK).
                - Cruiser "Ustinov" (16 heavy anti-ship missiles, "Fort-M" air defense missile systems, PLO helicopter, torpedoes).
                - At least one MAPL.
                These forces + 12 PLO helicopters on Kuznetsov are quite enough to control a rather vast water area, providing both anti-aircraft defense and anti-aircraft defense.
                Quote: vladimir1155
                two BODs and one two cruisers, this is unreliable this is not an escort, but a profanation

                In addition, they will not go to distant shores in such a composition, but will control the area of ​​combat deployment of our SSBNs.
                It's enough .
                And this is not all the forces of the Northern Fleet, because by the time Admiral Kuznetsov is commissioned, the Admiral Nakhimov and at least one more frigate 22350 should already be in service, and one BOD should be out of modernization.
                It all depends on what moment / date we are considering. "Kuznetsov" will be in service no earlier than the end of 2022 - 2023, and will acquire operational readiness "for battle and march" no earlier than 2024 - 2025.
                Now count the number of frigates 22350 \ 22350.1 on the stocks.
                With the forces that are expected by that time, it is possible to form not only the AUG, but also a fully combat-ready KUG, and there will still be forces to guard the base and bring the submarine to sea.
                1. Vladimir1155
                  Vladimir1155 11 May 2021 20: 32
                  -1
                  Quote: bayard
                  but will control the area of ​​combat deployment of our SSBNs

                  under the ice ...... will it be an icebreaking aircraft carrier? and on whom will they all throw Murmansk and Arkhangelsk?
                  1. bayard
                    bayard 11 May 2021 21: 38
                    +1
                    Covering is carried out BEFORE the SSBN goes under the ice.
                    And do not trump stupidity, you perfectly understand what it is about.
                    Quote: vladimir1155
                    icebreaking aircraft carrier?

                    We were talking about "Admiral Kuznetsov".
                    Quote: vladimir1155
                    and on whom will they all throw Murmansk and Arkhangelsk?

                    Basic aircraft, IPC, basic aircraft of PLO, diesel-electric submarines, and other ships of the fleet that are not involved in providing combat deployment.
                    1. Vladimir1155
                      Vladimir1155 12 May 2021 00: 40
                      +1
                      Quote: bayard
                      other ships of the fleet not involved in providing combat deployment.

                      6 old MPCs?
                    2. bayard
                      bayard 12 May 2021 11: 20
                      0
                      Quote: vladimir1155
                      6 old MPCs?

                      And so are they.
                      If we are talking about "Kuznetsov" (and we are talking about him), then the first such exit is possible not earlier than mid-2024 - after it has become operational. By this time, the following will already be in the ranks:
                      - missile cruiser "Admiral Nakhimov",
                      - two new frigates (No. 3 and No. 4) pr. 22350 (while on the way in 2024 there will be two more 22350, according to the already strengthened project),
                      - it is possible to exit from the repair and modernization of one BOD / frigate pr. 1155 and a destroyer of the "Sarych" type for the Northern Fleet.
                      Yes, and the "separation" will be short-lived - they brought the submarine to the area, provided cover for the deployment near the ice ... and home. In order not to unmask with their presence.
                    3. Vladimir1155
                      Vladimir1155 12 May 2021 22: 03
                      +1
                      Quote: bayard
                      Yes, and the "separation" will be short-lived - they brought the submarine to the area, provided cover for the deployment near the ice ... and home. In order not to unmask with their presence.

                      what then are we arguing about? if you are going to cover not the deployment area, but the area around the base to the boundaries of the ice? so I am for it! all the NKs listed by you will be useful for this, you also need to add there the ships of the second first rank that are completely unnecessary on the seas, a couple of frigates and three corvettes with BF + more minesweepers, corvettes and submarines will be ready by 2024, + add three frigates 11356 and a cruiser there Moscow is completely redundant in the Black Sea Fleet (and the Black Sea Fleet should be reinforced with a pair of Tatarstan-Dagestan and new karakurt Buyan and IPC removed from the north). Then you will get a normal fleet to ensure the deployment of SSBNs .... and Kuzya will then receive escort and at least some small sense ... the question is, then, is Kuzya really needed if the entire indicated zone is mono-covered by aircraft from the shore?
  • antivirus
    antivirus 11 May 2021 09: 15
    -3
    on the contrary, the commissioning for the installation of a complex of reusable missiles with individual warheads will be delayed.
    This will fly away 2-3 thousand km and shoot the gliding BG. then she goes back to the landing and herself into the hangar for maintenance and reloading. ETOGES Kuzya !!!
    1. novel66
      novel66 11 May 2021 09: 57
      +1
      I am ashamed to ask - who will direct?
      1. Petro_tut
        Petro_tut 11 May 2021 10: 02
        0
        I am ashamed to ask - who will direct?

        By herself, by the stars laughing
        Well, or just obum laughing
        1. novel66
          novel66 11 May 2021 10: 02
          +1
          or dwarf operator ?? lol
        2. novel66
          novel66 11 May 2021 10: 04
          +4
          or how are the Americans?
      2. Trapperxnumx
        Trapperxnumx 11 May 2021 10: 35
        0
        Quote: novel xnumx
        and who will direct?

        By the smell of course
        1. The comment was deleted.
      3. antivirus
        antivirus 11 May 2021 11: 04
        0
        that's it for the stars. without mind.
        the Americans suddenly became concerned with this option.
        not brothers are working in front of the locomotive.
        we put our locomotive on the right track.
        Warhead - homing and Glonas + satellites (+ Archer with a rubber boat with a spotter-gunner), reusable rocket - from the Kuzi mast and to a given area in the brains, and back to the hangar
  • TerraSandera
    TerraSandera 11 May 2021 09: 03
    -1
    Under the modernized old system, you can lay a good cottage, sorry, budget *
  • Soldatov V.
    Soldatov V. 11 May 2021 09: 19
    0
    The lack of a coherent modernization program for the aircraft carrier is a matter of disappointment. In general, is there a general chief builder of the ship, linking everything into a single ship repair plan. Has a prosecutor, special officer, and military receptionist been appointed to monitor the actions of contractors and shipbuilders? All and sundry are sawing money.
  • Kapkan
    Kapkan 11 May 2021 09: 34
    +5
    I read the comments of the poor, felt sad. Pride, not pride ... what kind of nonsense are you talking about ???
    The fleet is the fleet! No fleet - no pride in the country. And an aircraft carrier or an aircraft-carrying cruiser is the development of technologies, an increase in competencies.
    For me personally, a HUGE pride, as for land, is that in my GREAT city of Chelyabinsk, they make this system, which was described in the article!
    Here, in Chelyabinsk, they are doing SO much for the country and for the military.
    In particular, Artificial Intelligence for the Armata and the T-90. Yes, a lot more for what. Not everything can be said.
    And these are all competencies, these are all intelligence. And therefore, I am infinitely proud that thousands of kilometers from the seas on which such handsome men as Kuznetsov walk (and not only, but this is not yet possible), we make his nervous system for him!
    And so, yes, I am an ordinary land infantry with a Kalashnikov without fashionable optics and on a mechanical sight, but at the same time proud of OUR, MY fleet and country!
    1. Doccor18
      Doccor18 11 May 2021 09: 44
      +2
      Quote: Kapkan
      but at the same time proud of OUR, MY fleet and country!

      I agree with you! good
    2. Ross xnumx
      Ross xnumx 11 May 2021 10: 55
      +1
      Quote: Kapkan
      I read the comments of the poor, felt sad. Pride, not pride ... what kind of nonsense are you talking about ???

      May I inquire about the names you assigned to the "poor"?
      Here on the site mainly people gather, whose life was connected or is connected now with the army and navy. We also want to feel proud of the navy and the army. I will say more, not only your Chelyabinsk is famous for "oh-oh-oh-very much for the country and for the military."
      Tell me, is your joy based on the fact that "even a teaspoon, but they do it"? You understand, the production, which belongs to "separately taken uncles (and aunts)" and the volume of which has increased HA ... HA ... (tell us the numbers ...)
      Now look here:
      MOSCOW, August 20 - RIA Novosti. The head of the state corporation "Rostec" Sergey Chemezov at the end of 2019 earned 403,262 million rubles, which 21% more compared to 2018 (332,284 million), follows from the declaration on the income of state corporation employeesposted on the Rostec website.
      At the same time, Chemezov's wife earned 1,49 billion rubles during the reporting period, which is 8 times more than in 2018, and also sold a land plot for individual housing construction with an area of ​​almost 3 thousand square meters, follows from the declaration.

      Therefore, you can break your head proving to me that the salaries of officials in charge of (well, you know) should grow faster than the volume of products produced in the entrusted area. And the fact that you agree to run "with a Kalashnikov without fashionable optics and on a mechanical sight" is your desire, BUT (!!!) not your interests. yes
      1. Ross xnumx
        Ross xnumx 11 May 2021 11: 14
        -1
        I completely forgot the information for comparison:
        The corporation invests in the development of human resources. In 2019, the average salary at Rostec enterprises increased by 9,9%, reaching 54,4 thousand rubles per month - higherthan the average for the regions of presence.

        What's it like with:
        The head of the Rostec state corporation Sergey Chemezov earned 2019 million rubles at the end of 403,262, which is 21% more compared to 2018 (332,284 million), follows from the income statement of employees of the state corporation posted on the Rostec website.
      2. Kapkan
        Kapkan 11 May 2021 12: 01
        -1
        May I inquire about the names you assigned to the "poor"?

        At first I wanted to list, but after seeing your whining below, I realized that you are just their leader, and therefore this is enough.
        Here on the site mainly people gather, whose life was connected or is connected now with the army and the navy. We also want to feel proud of the navy and the army.

        As my father used to say: wearing an officer's shoulder straps and being them are diametrically opposite things. Again, judging by your whining, you were their only carrier. Well, or you played / are playing some role in an area related to the army and navy. No difference.
        I will say more, not only your Chelyabinsk is famous for "oh-oh-oh-very much for the country and for the military."

        I'll just say - you are not in the subject. In addition, I did not belittle the merits of other cities in any way, and did not extol the merits of Chelyabinsk (although it could have been, but laziness). This was said only in the context of the article.
        Tell me, is your joy based on the fact that "even a teaspoon, but they do it"?

        I am proud of the deeds and results. And very often joy.
        You, like the total majority, are not able to estimate the production volumes of certain products, both due to the usual ignorance, and due to the secrecy of production volumes. Otherwise, they would not have carried nonsense.
        Now look here:

        Not interested. I do not consider other people's money and ways of getting rich. If you have questions and you are so knowledgeable about this, and you are so upset about it - write a statement to the relevant authorities and seek justice that suits you. And so, this is all written by you "Platoshkin-style" with a smart look.
        I don’t care.
        Therefore, you can break your head, proving to me

        It seems to me that you are insane and confuse me with someone. I am not discussing other people's money. I am only interested in my job and my money. And also, I am focused on the results of my work under any conditions.
        And the fact that you agree to run "with a Kalashnikov without fashionable optics and on a mechanical sight" is your desire, BUT (!!!) not your interests. yes

        Do I agree to run? My desire?? What I have to run with is not the same as what I agree with or desire.
        There is a certain reality with which you need to come to terms and accept, and then everything will go right at once. In case of mobilization, I will be given, at best, AK74M, at worst, AK47. Both will be lubricated with mechanical sights. Both will be in a wooden box, from which I, and everyone who receives such a machine gun, will have to "bring it to a normal battle" and go to the designated area. And this is a harsh reality that hits all your (or not your) IPSC-style shooting aspirations.
        But, you are right about one thing - these are not my interests. They go much further and wider beyond the limits of the thesis "running with Kalashnikov." However, when I get him out of the box, wipe off the grease, I kiss him and say - Thank you for being there, mentally imagining a smiling, kindly, Mikhail Timofeevich.
        1. Ross xnumx
          Ross xnumx 11 May 2021 12: 05
          -1
          Quote: Kapkan
          At first I wanted to list, but after seeing your whining below, I realized that you are just their leader, and therefore this is enough.

          At first I wanted to answer. Then I realized that you are one of the "Kremlin bots" team, and your surname is Doolin.
          No, gentlemen, beads for you. Not!
          1. Kapkan
            Kapkan 11 May 2021 13: 27
            -2
            At first I wanted to answer.

            It's strange ... It's amazing that you suddenly decide that your answers are interesting to someone, or I need them.
            However, you have asked questions and received answers. Eat them, swallow them and move on your way, wiping away a tear.
            And there were no questions from me to you anywhere.
            You are, for me, like an open book.
            And as for Doolin, I was waiting for you to slide down to this meanness ...
            On the second page of this "Book", or in the epilogue, on the third.
            But, slipped right away and on the first of this cheap reading.
            No, gentlemen, beads for you. Not!

            A typical phrase when arguments end without beginning. By the way, typical for you (in different variations).
            Oh yes, well, or, as an option, remember about Doulin ... I think this is the limit of your erudition and awareness.
  • mag nit
    mag nit 11 May 2021 09: 58
    -1
    If only the crane on the deck did not fall ...
  • alexey2073
    alexey2073 11 May 2021 16: 15
    -1
    TAKR "Admiral Kuznetsov" can get a new shipborne navigation and landing complex
    or maybe not get it. There is no money already ... but we are holding on! And by the time of delivery, it is unlikely that it will be "new".