There is data on the timing of the start of operation of the NITKA training aviation complex in Yeisk

There were messages about the timing of the commissioning of the complex for training flights of the deck aviation in the city of Yeysk (Krasnodar Territory). We are talking about a ground test training complex, which is designated by the abbreviation NITKA.

According to the information service TASS, referring to a source in the OPK, the deadlines for the commissioning of the complex in Yeisk have been postponed again.

According to the latest data, it is planned to complete construction and installation work not earlier than the end of the current (2021) year, and to carry out the commissioning of the object in 2022. If these plans are met, NITKA will start operating in 2023.

It should be noted that talks about the completion of construction and the "early start of operation" of the complex in Yeisk have been going on for several years. Initially, THREAD was supposed to open for use by aircraft about 5 years ago, but the dates were postponed several times.

In the event of the opening of a ground-based training airline complex in Yeisk, it will be the second in Russia. A complex of this type is located in the area of ​​the city of Saki (Crimea). THREAD in Saki consists of take-off and landing links - with catapults and aerofinishers, has a springboard, which makes it possible to use the complex for training carrier-based aircraft of the aircraft-carrying cruiser "Admiral Kuznetsov". Recall that the only aircraft carrier of the Russian Navy is undergoing repairs, while a number of modernization works are being carried out at the same time.

Comments

[AlexVas44]

A little more, a little more, and there will be two complexes for one aircraft carrier. But, apparently, this is how it should be - there will be more trained crews, and there, perhaps, they will swing at the aircraft carriers.

[LiSiCyn]

Quote: AlexVas44

there will be more trained crews, and there, maybe, they will swing at aircraft carriers

For trophy ..
3-4 "Nimitz" is just right.

[antivirus]

+!
use the Strategic Missile Forces for Victory and receive reparations. in tch Nimitsev. and welders do not pay for harm

[Starover_Z]

Quote: LiSiCyn

For trophy ..
3-4 "Nimitz" is just right.

Well, maybe play chess with the Americans on their aircraft carriers.

[LiSiCyn]

Quote: Starover_Z

Well, maybe play chess with the Americans on their aircraft carriers

I agree. And in the middle of the game, the board over the ears

[midivan]

Quote: AlexVas44

and there, perhaps, they will swing at the aircraft carriers.

And why could it be? Or are they building a second complex just for fun? I see no reason to keep two simulators on the farm without aircraft carriers, the climate + is the same, and if there is no reason for the experience (and why is it if there is no one to sit on), Kuzya carries not so many planes to rivet hundreds of flyers, it means that there is something in the plans of the MO. Otherwise, I don't understand anything at all, even though I'm already warm in this.

[Nevsky_ZU]

Quote: midivan

Quote: AlexVas44

and there, perhaps, they will swing at the aircraft carriers.

And why could it be? Or are they building a second complex just for fun? ...

The decision was made before 2014. As well as the naval base in Novorossiysk.

[ugol2]

And what is not clear here. In Yeisk, they began to build, so that there was a thread on its territory. And then it turned out that Russia had two lines for one cruiser.
The second one doesn't seem to be needed now. But you can't quit - how much has already been spent on it.

[Pereira]

On March 22, 2016, Major General Igor Kozhin, who at that time was the chief of naval aviation of the Russian Navy, reported to the Minister of Defense that the complex in Yeisk would be commissioned by the end of the same year. It is reported by Rambler.

[ugol2]

This is a military trick.
Let the adversary think that they will fly in Yeisk. He is developing an agent network there, placing hemp with spy equipment in the forest.
And here - on you - in the Crimea, the ship regiments are training.

[APASUS]

Time passes, the requirements for the equipment and the aircraft themselves are changing. In my opinion, the Thread is already outdated. New complexes are required, under the new requirements

[Gardener91]

Quote: APASUS

The thread is already out of date

When Yak-141 aircraft on decks are in service, even then the "string" will be in demand. At least for the practical development of the approach with the "Luna" system. Maybe another one is already in use, but the principle of approaching and landing on the deck is the same.

[Gardener91]

Two simulators even with one "Kuzey" is already good. The number of landings per month on a deck with an air arrestor is no more than six (!). Pilots simply go blind due to the destruction of the retina of the eye during a sharp and sufficiently large longitudinal acceleration during braking. Therefore, the quantitative and qualitative composition of the crews with intensive use of the deck should be increased. For the Americans, all frontline strike aircraft are equipped with a brake hook in case the main GDPs are disabled, with the possibility of landing on shortened sites equipped with braking systems.

[Grandfather]

ten comments on the topic, in 12 hours, and not a single "hurray" -speak for themselves ... there is no more faith in the government and in aircraft carriers.

[Gardener91]

Quote: Dead Day

there is no more faith in the government and aircraft carriers.

At school, at the lessons of the CWP, I received a "5" for insisting that the USSR did not have aircraft carriers, having aircraft-carrying cruisers available. After all, by itself, without an escort of security and support, the aircraft carrier "dove of peace" with a one-time use. And this is a very expensive thing. The cruiser has almost a full range of defensive and offensive weapons in its arsenal. I partly understand the skepticism of the opponents of aircraft carriers in "pure form".

[midivan]

Quote: Dead Day

ten comments on the topic, in 12 hours, and not a single "hurray" -speak for themselves ... there is no more faith in the government and in aircraft carriers.

Not for everyone, I have faith ... Aircraft carriers, why did they annoy you that you don't believe them so much?

[Pavel57]

"Let's learn to swim, they will pour water into the pool."

[ramzay21]

That is, there are two NITKs and both do not work. There is an aircraft carrier, but 30 years cannot be brought to mind. Awesome power.