American Admiral: British Navy sends a clear signal to Beijing by sending an aircraft carrier strike group east

American Admiral James Stavridis, who at one time headed the European Command of the US Army, spoke in the Western press about the British naval navy... According to Admiral Stavridis, the British navy "has always assisted the US Navy in important operations."

From a statement by the American admiral to the US press:

British warships were invariably well controlled, manned and armed. We have always had excellent communication with them. When we boarded to the British allies, we could have a glass of foam at dinner in the wardroom, unlike our ships, where the "dry law" operates.

US Admiral Stavridis comments on London's new doctrine dubbed "Global Britain".

Recall that on the basis of this doctrine, the authorities of the United Kingdom are going to strengthen their fleet, sending it to different regions of the oceans. One of the tasks is to send an aircraft carrier strike group to the maritime borders of China.

James Stavridis:

By sending an aircraft carrier strike group eastward, the British Navy sends a clear signal to Beijing. The strike group, led by the aircraft carrier Queen Elizabeth, includes two advanced air defense destroyers and two very powerful anti-submarine frigates, as well as a nuclear submarine. The air wing consists of 5th generation fighters.

According to Stavridis, an American destroyer with the Aegis system and a Dutch Navy warship will join the British AUG.

Such an aircraft carrier strike group, according to Stavridis, will be able to restrain China from "aggression against Taiwan."

American admiral:

A strong UK presence in these waters (in the Pacific) will be welcomed not only in Washington, but also at the headquarters of the US Pacific Fleet in Hawaii and, most of all, the US Seventh Fleet in Yokosuka, Japan.

It should be added that the AUG of the British Navy was still in the Mediterranean Sea, from where two ships from its composition were sent to the Black Sea area "to contain Russia." It turns out that Britain is going to "send signals" to both China and Russia simultaneously with one AUG.

Comments

[NDR-791]

It should be added that the AUG of the British Navy was still in the Mediterranean Sea, from where two ships from its composition were sent to the Black Sea area "to contain Russia."
Won't you overstrain?
US Admiral Stavridis comments on London's new doctrine dubbed "Global Britain".
And eternal suffering in its former "greatness". Global britain. It takes a long time to type, but it sounds cool. Can be used as a self-name

[xorek]

China is not Russia, they will not talk about concern .. I hope the Anglo-Saxons have stocked up with diapers?

[Anatoly 288]

Interestingly, with such a twine, the twine will not break?

[Alexander 3]

In my opinion, all countries received a clear signal in XNUMX. What awaits any country in the event of aggression against Russia.

[xorek]

Quote: Alexander 3

In my opinion, all countries received a clear signal in XNUMX. What awaits any country in the event of aggression against Russia.

They are afraid of Russia in a direct military conflict, so there is an attempt to destroy it from within. In the 90s, they did not finish it off, and now they are tearing and tossing.
And China is not Russia for them! At the end of the 80s they squeezed their liberals with tanks and their economic spurt went, well, they created the Army to the envy of the whole world!

[Shurik70]

They made Pug yapping at the Dragon.
The pug will only hope that the Dragon will not pay attention to her.

[xorek]

Quote: Shurik70

They made Pug yapping at the Dragon.
The pug will only hope that the Dragon will not pay attention to her.

It was Alexander who was forced !!! I remember they also tried and are trying to play off with China ... Everyone wants to solve their problems in the economy with someone else's hands and write off their debts ..
The United States is terribly afraid that China will present them with promissory notes for a couple of trillions and, in general, will impose sanctions .. The Chinese are still pragmatically keeping quiet and continue to build up their military and economic power.

[Vladimir Mashkov]

Shouldn't they send messengers? ...

[Nazar]

Alexander 3 - In 1991, there was the USSR and not the Russian Federation. Only in XNUMX, what "signal" do you think all countries received - huh?

[Alexander 3]

The grandchildren of those who defeated fascism will not let us down. We need to carefully choose the leadership, no matter what happens, as in Ukraine.

[xorek]

Quote: Alexander 3

The grandchildren of those who defeated fascism will not let us down. We need to carefully choose the leadership, no matter what happens, as in Ukraine.

God forbid !!!! Have seen enough already

[YOU]

How are we? Where are you from the Mediterranean. They forgot about us. Only 2 destroyers

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: xorek

China is not Russia, they will not talk about concern .. I hope the Anglo-Saxons have stocked up with diapers?

According to Admiral James Stavridis, they stocked up on beer and British beer group goes to raise the striped spirit.

[ironic]

What will they do?

[Thrifty]

God punished with the name of the admiral, and I just want to eat him

[max702]

Nothing has changed, as the Anglo-Saxon Empire was the main one in the world and remained, the rebranding was carried out and no more, they slightly went into the shadows, and since they ruled and ruled ..

[Coconut]

British navy sends clear signal to Beijing

British navy is that? ... heels of rusty troughs? gods entertainment for china

[NDR-791]

Quote: Coco

British navy is that? ... heels of rusty troughs?

So she will not come alone, she will come with the blacksmith (s). But in fact, they send the whole crowd there three times a year aircraft carrier groups "to have a look." They will look and back out. Even the Australians want to get there.

[Lech from Android.]

When the Anglo-Saxons start talking about the signals, it makes me laugh, I cut the meat with a kitchen knife ... I also send a signal to Admiral Stavridis.
The Anglo-Saxons do not understand that the signals for us have a slightly different meaning and they should have expressed their concern for Russia differently.

[Pereira]

I'll buy a can of horse mackerel today and eat it. This will be the signal.

[Alexander 3]

It's a pity that only horse mackerel finds out about it.

[Pereira]

Here I am about the same. How many Chinese people find out that some Stavridas is sending them a signal? And if they do, then what? Need to run somewhere?

[Alexander 3]

It turns out that satavridas farted and some professors figured out what signal they were sending.

[antivirus]

of course Singapore is not Taiwan, but modern China is not imperial Japan
Measure seven times, cut once and throw it away without regret.

[And Us Rat]

And laughter and sin, they did not confuse the weight category?

[1536]

The British belief that they will not drown in any sea-okey is easy to understand. And the British know this too. Their dream is to turn the whole world into a public toilet and live without sewage disposal.

[Catfish]

British warships were invariably well managed, manned and armed.

Under the Falklands, this was especially noticeable.

[Krasnodar]

Constantine, but, nevertheless, they took their islands on the other side of the World)),

[Catfish]

And yet the banana guys did great, a nice snap on the nose of the "lords of the seas".

[Krasnodar]

Why is it good? The fact that the territory near their shores was pumped?

[Catfish]

I mean the number of ships damaged and sunk. And the territory is not exactly very close to their shores, backyards, sir. All that is known is that Spee's squadron was killed there.

[Krasnodar]

Backyards are not backyards, far from the Island)). There is no such thing as a war without losses, but they completed their task, and the battles of ships of such tonnage in such numbers took place for the first time in modern history - a trifle such as fights between Israeli boats and Arab boats using electronic warfare does not count

[voyaka uh]

And with whom next?
Except Argentina, no one is around.
But from England - indeed, thousands of kilometers.
Plus, South Atlantic, constantly stormy weather.
But they sailed from afar - piled up - the capitulation of the capital and all the garrisons.

[Catfish]

I was referring to the price paid by the British, in the ship's composition, for this pile of stones. They already have little of their former greatness. So someone piled on someone, that's another question. And this is with the banana republic, but what if there is a serious opponent?

[Krasnodar]

It was precisely this that was a manifestation of its former greatness - the willingness to put a bunch of expensive equipment and people behind a pile of stones "somewhere out there." Moreover, the operation did not in any way affect the image and standard of living of the British, as they rotted in their capitalism, and did not notice the war
Well, who piled on whom? Whose islets? ))
With a serious adversary, the war is waged in a different format - after the first skirmish, decisions are made primarily at the government level, and is it worth it, and if so, are we fighting at all, if so, to what border is conventional and when we turn to warmth and light ... If there were, say, the seizure of the islands of the PRC (hypothetically), then there would be nuclear submarines to blockade the islands for the sake of. After the first badabum, they would sit down at the negotiating table, based on their results, they would decide how to proceed further.
Well, measures of economic pressure - above all

[Catfish]

Two Jews attacked me. Just dig a machine gun from the garden. Who is Britain to you, mother of lice Britain? Alexei Vaughn writes about some kind of "pure" victory of the British, but what kind of cleanliness is there with such losses in the ship composition? I understand that when Sturdy sank almost the entire Spee squadron without losing a single ship, it really was a pure victory, no matter what they say about the superiority of battle cruisers over armored ones.

[Krasnodar]

Quote: Sea Cat

Two Jews attacked me. Just dig a machine gun from the garden. Who is Britain to you, mother of lice Britain? Alexei Vaughn writes about some kind of "pure" victory of the British, but what kind of cleanliness is there with such losses in the ship composition? I understand that when Sturdy sank almost the entire Spee squadron without losing a single ship, it really was a pure victory, no matter what they say about the superiority of battle cruisers over armored ones.

To us Britain is a former colonialist. You just need to objectively look at a potential adversary - then there will be less disappointment

[Catfish]

I, of course, am not a strategist and not a politician, but somehow it does not work to consider Britain a serious enemy, she was blown away somehow after the Second World War, but during that war the British army did not glorify itself with any victories, the navy - yes , these guys knew how to fight and went to the end, but now they do not have a fleet, as well as we, sinners. And if there is a big mess, then they will not perform solo, but only together with the entire European Caudle and behind the American uncle's back. So they are unlikely to pull on the opponent "one-on-one".

[Krasnodar]

Let's just say - one-on-one in their history they generally twitched relatively rarely. ))
But - do not forget that in any case they have a little less chaos, and the training of soldiers is at least no worse, the army is professional, having similar experience with the RF Armed Forces in fighting the barmaley.

[Catfish]

Well, I don’t know about the mess, the army, it itself is such an institution where the mess is assumed a priori. Now you can talk a lot about the professionalism of this or that army, but this is just talk, and how it will be in practice, this case will just show.

[Krasnodar]

Quote: Sea Cat

Well, I don’t know about the mess, the army, it itself is such an institution where the mess is assumed a priori. Now you can talk a lot about the professionalism of this or that army, but this is just talk, and how it will be in practice, this case will just show.

I agree - how it will come out is actually unknown)).
As for the mess - any army is a parasitic organization, i.e. producing nothing, but consuming, the effectiveness of which is revealed only in times of war, which happens rarely.
However, they do not have many of the phenomena typical of the Russian Army - they have a different society.

[Catfish]

Each society has its own specific characteristics, in our country, for example, homosexuals are not liked, but they thrive in the army as well.
"And I hit him on the helmet with a chamomile - go away, you nasty one, the homeland is in danger."

[Krasnodar]

They do not like, in words they even hate. ))

[voyaka uh]

I hope you don’t consider the South Kuril Islands "a heap of stones"?
And Russia is ready to fight to the death for them, no matter what the losses.
Why do you so easily belittle the importance of the Falklands for the British?
The casualties of the British army were negligible, and the ships for
that's what they build, so that they fight, and not rust at the piers before disposal.
And the victory was pure, absolute. Garrison surrender, shift
Argentine flag over the capital in British.

[Catfish]

I hope you don’t consider the South Kuril Islands "a heap of stones"?

Alexey , "where is the river, and where is the estate"? I mean where is England and where is the Falklands?
And, where is Russia, and where is the Kuril Islands?
The Kuril Ridge is a natural continuation of mainland Russia, here it is rather at the time of the Japanese to ask what they are doing on our islands.
And what are the Falklands?
No, I don’t argue, the victory in Great Britain is really epoch-making, which is there, right at the level of Trafalgar.

[voyaka uh]

Well, the victory over Georgia is not the Bagration operation either. ,
and without losses in aviation, it was not without
"banana republic"
but they are deservedly proud of such a victory in Russia.

[Catfish]

There was no war. There was an attack by Georgians on the post of peacekeepers, there was a retaliatory blow, after which "timid Georgians fled." There, in order to finally understand and take Tbilisi, one Chechen battalion "Vostok" would be enough for the eyes, so these Georgian warriors, as soon as they heard the Chechen speech on the air, threw tanks, missiles and dris ... (sorry) pulled in the opposite direction from enemy direction. So it was not a war there, but a punitive action, unfortunately, with losses.

[Krasnodar]

And the Chechens there were the only ones who knew how to shoot and think at the same time? I know that they are athletic and hardy guys, many of whom have hunted since childhood, etc., but why was there fear in front of the Chechens, and not the airborne forces, for example?

[Catfish]

Their glory is such, unique, and this is in addition to serious military experience. And as for the reconnaissance companies of the Airborne Forces, they don't cut their throats, there is no such tradition, maybe in vain.

[Krasnodar]

Quote: Sea Cat

Their glory is such, unique, and this is in addition to serious military experience. And as for the reconnaissance companies of the Airborne Forces, they don't cut their throats, there is no such tradition, maybe in vain.

Cutting the throat of a prisoner is a sign of weakness. On the contrary, there should be information about what is good in captivity - it saves the lives of its own soldiers, etc.

[Catfish]

Cutting the throat of a prisoner is a sign of weakness.

But, nevertheless, "timid Georgians fled", abandoning their equipment. It is a fact.

[Krasnodar]

And if there weren't Georgians?

[Catfish]

Albert, you know that history has no subjunctive mood.

They painted on board with a paintbrush so that it could be seen from a mile away who came to visit them.

[Krasnodar]

Yes, familiar show-off

[Catfish]

However, they worked, after crossing the Georgian border, there was no resistance at all.

[Krasnodar]

I do not argue that everything that works is good

[Cat]

nevertheless, they took their islands on the other side of the world

Still not to take it if the British did not make it out of the top five in terms of the military budget, and Argentina, on average, did not even make it into the top 40 countries. The level of military spending is not always an indicator, but nevertheless.

[Krasnodar]

Quote: Gato

nevertheless, they took their islands on the other side of the world

Still not to take it if the British did not make it out of the top five in terms of the military budget, and Argentina, on average, did not even make it into the top 40 countries. The level of military spending is not always an indicator, but nevertheless.

But the battle took place off the coast of Argentina)).

[Pereira]

If the Falklands had been beaten 100 km closer to Argentina, the war would have ended differently.
Aviation worked not to the limit. One or two maneuvers and landing on the water on return.
Well, do not forget, according to statistics, 80% of Argentine bombs and missiles that hit the ships did not explode. This is definitely not the merit of the British.

[Krasnodar]

Quote: Pereira

If the Falklands had been beaten 100 km closer to Argentina, the war would have ended differently.
Aviation worked not to the limit. One or two maneuvers and landing on the water on return.
Well, do not forget, according to statistics, 80% of Argentine bombs and missiles that hit the ships did not explode. This is definitely not the merit of the British.

Would be 100 km closer, the British would attack airfields directly on the territory of Argentina
The result, in any case, would be in their favor, since Argentines, as you rightly noted, are slovens

[voyaka uh]

"80% of Argentine bombs and missiles that hit the ships did not explode.
This is definitely not the merit of the British "///
----
This is entirely due to the slovens of the Argentines.
Before combat bombing, it is customary to conduct training, where
set up bomb fuses. If you don't,
it turns out: "his grenades are of the wrong system"

[Cat]

the war would have ended differently.

This is unlikely. They would have provided a naval blockade of the islands in any case. And without supplies from the mainland, the surrender of the Argentine landing would be only a matter of time for the banal reason for the lack of food.

[And Us Rat]

Quote: Krasnodar

Constantine, but, nevertheless, they took their islands on the other side of the World)),

Argentina and China are still slightly different in their capabilities.

[Krasnodar]

I agree - that's why I'm writing that serious opponents would try to limit the conflict a priori

[Doccor18]

British Navy sends a clear signal to Beijing by sending an aircraft carrier strike group east

that the Chinese are going in the right direction ...

Such an aircraft carrier strike group, according to Stavridis, will be able to restrain China from "aggression against Taiwan."

It is dangerous, very dangerous to overestimate oneself in such a way and underestimate the enemy so much.

[Ryusei]

Interesting remark ...

[rocket757]

Such an aircraft carrier strike group, according to Stavridis, will be able to restrain China from "aggression against Taiwan."
American admiral:

... He himself understood what he said ???

[knn54]

-According to Stavridis, an American destroyer with the Aegis system, as well as a Dutch Navy warship, will join the British AUG.
You don't often see an admiral with a "naval" surname.
I repeat, the British could not themselves (without those who joined) form a full-fledged AUG, but they are sending signals.
Not SOS yet ...

[tralflot1832]

Who knows how many aircraft carriers in China are already combat-ready and equipped with airplanes and pilots. And the fleet in China has a wagon and a small cart for meeting the English signalmen! They can start leading them from the Red Sea, and put four of their own on each of their pennants. ...

[aszzz888]

According to Admiral Stavridis, the British navy "has always assisted the US Navy in important operations."

Sharkhan, hyena - two pair of boots.

[xorek]

Quote: aszzz888

Sharkhan, hyena - two pair of boots.

Their name is Naglo-Saxons !!!!!

[aszzz888]

xorek
Today, 09: 58
NEW

+1
Quote: aszzz888
Sharkhan, hyena - two pair of boots.

Their name is Naglo-Saxons !!!!! laughing

! ANDхah, love)) they suck! One of the "boots" - and it is possible for both of them at once - to tear off the shins from the sole, and onto the debris!

[Artemion3]

When we boarded to the British allies, we could have a glass of foam at dinner in the wardroom, unlike our ships, where the "dry law" operates.

Hmm, things are not very good in the Royal Navy, and they can even drink openly in the service. This is what I call democracy

[Cat]

Hmm ... A pretty shriveled and shabby lion struggles to growl for old memory.

[Evil 55]

I would not be surprised if "Granny" stays there or stands in Tianjin, next to "Kiev", as a playground ....

[VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK]

In real combat, none of the ships will return.

[Valentin Tveryakov]

What a great friendship that makes you want to cry from emotion！ The countries that have been terrorizing the whole world for the last 100 years have kindled with love each other in the fight against China, and of course Russia. And this is presented as a great happiness for all the peoples of the world. open up！

[nikolaj1703]

It's time to drown - the clearest signal.