The footage showing the fall of the Kalibr rocket launched from the frigate of the Russian Navy

190

Videos are published on the network, which show footage from the exercises of the frigate "Marshal Shaposhnikov". After modernization, this warship received Caliber cruise missiles as weapons. The reports say that the launches of these missiles from vertical installations were carried out by the frigate of the Russian Navy during the exercises.

As you can see from the footage, the rocket left the vertical launcher, rose to a height of several tens of meters, but was unable to go to hit the target. A vertical movement with rotation began. Then there was a flash, and the rocket, falling apart, began to fall into the water.



After falling into the water, a stain remained on the sea surface, burning continued, and flashes were visible. The ship departed from the place where the rocket fell.

Filming of the incident was carried out from the air.

At the same time, it has not yet been reported about exactly when the abnormal missile launch from the Russian warship took place.

The voice of the filmmaker:

Do we fold the move?


There have been no official reports of the incident that occurred during the missile launch. In this case, the question arises, which of the filmmakers (or those to whom it got after filming) posted this video on the network and for what purposes - in order to be completely open? It can be assumed that this is one of the first launches, after which the errors were corrected. At the same time, some users called the frames "having signs of animation."
190 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +69
    April 29 2021 15: 05
    That's what tests are for, to test weapons. Only those who do nothing do not fail. I hope conclusions will be drawn and the necessary changes made.

    PS And do not rejoice in other people's failures, this joy leads to your own problems. This is the news about the MQ-8B.
    1. +26
      April 29 2021 15: 10
      I like this vidos more. The first launch of the Caliber rocket from the Pacific Fleet frigate Marshal Shaposhnikov. As the saying goes, it's hard to learn, it's easy to fight. Looks like the jambs have been fixed. It's okay if the first pancake came out lumpy. That's what they teach.
      1. +21
        April 29 2021 15: 16
        It’s good that the rocket didn’t hit the side of the frigate.
        1. +12
          April 29 2021 15: 20
          Quote: Bashkirkhan
          It’s good that the rocket didn’t hit the side of the frigate.

          In the video above, the Caliber rocket was regularly operated from the frigate Marshal Shaposhnikov. It's just that there is a hole in the old woman. And to be afraid of missiles in the navy not to serve can be said to reverse another popular wisdom (not to be afraid of wolves in the forest).
          1. +24
            April 29 2021 15: 51
            well, in the video there is a cant in the rocket itself .. taking into account that a couple of hundred missiles have already been launched .. marriage is banal
            1. +42
              April 29 2021 16: 27
              Quote: Barberry25
              well, in the video there is a cant in the rocket itself .. taking into account that a couple of hundred missiles have already been launched .. marriage is banal

              There is a jamb not only in the rocket, but also in the video leak, when the circle of persons admitted to video recording and analysis of launches is limited.
              1. +9
                April 29 2021 16: 28
                anything like that happens ... let the counterintelligence understand
                1. +2
                  April 30 2021 06: 48
                  Looks like the cormorant got on the course. wassat

                  Interestingly, the rocket also cut circles in the water.

                  There, apparently, a shark was caught. wassat

                  The missile was probably artificially intelligent. winked

                  First, a bird was worked out along the route, and then a fish fellow


                  In fact, there are no problems at all.
                  Well, the rocket fell. We can say that the situation is predictable.
                  There is always the possibility of failure.

                  Let me remind you that even the Unions were falling.
              2. -1
                April 29 2021 16: 52
                Quote: Nyrobsky
                There is a jamb not only in the rocket, but also in the leaked video

                I don’t think the adversaries weren’t filming at the same time. So it's better to admit the cant ourselves, than to wait for joyful yells and poking fingers from THEM. And they will not stay with them. Kekliks have already, for sure, aroused to orgasm.
                1. +4
                  April 29 2021 18: 05
                  Kekliki already, for sure, are aroused to orgasm.
                  And what, is there because of what?
                  1. +3
                    April 29 2021 19: 34
                    Can tell them that, in parallel with the launch of the calibers, the anti-missile EMU defense system was being worked out
                  2. +1
                    April 29 2021 21: 41
                    Quote: val43
                    Kekliki already, for sure, are aroused to orgasm.
                    And what, is there because of what?

                    Keklikam, show your finger and everything sailed, orgasm, peremog!
                    1. +1
                      April 30 2021 06: 00
                      30 vis "And what, is there because of what?"
                      They have already gotten smashed in the news.)))
                      1. +4
                        April 30 2021 06: 24
                        Quote: Nagaibak
                        30 vis "And what, is there because of what?"
                        They have already gotten smashed in the news.)))

                        And hi to them !! Let them indulge in self-satisfaction ... There is little entertainment in ukre .. Just walk along Khreshchatyk with the Nazi banners of the Galicia ESS division, and self-satisfaction from the news from Russia ... Miserable ..
                  3. -2
                    April 29 2021 22: 11
                    Quote: val43
                    And what, is there because of what?

                    And the fact that the "Muscovites" rocket fell is not a reason for exuberant joy?
                2. +3
                  April 30 2021 08: 38
                  “I don’t think the adversaries didn’t shoot at the same time. So it’s better to admit the joint ourselves, than to wait for the joyful yelling and poking fingers from THEM. And they will not stay long. Kekliks have probably already been aroused to orgasm.”

                  And the Raguli have already launched this video on their YouTube channel with the signature of the shame of the Russian army, etc., and of course they rejoice at each other there ..
                  1. -2
                    April 30 2021 15: 30
                    THEM will not be late. XXXXXXX are probably already aroused to orgasm. "

                    What kind of people are you?
                    Your rocket fell, and almost on your head, and we are all about the Ukrainians ...
                    Hard case...
                    1. 0
                      April 30 2021 23: 12
                      Do we deny it? Not.
                      According to Russian custom, we are doing self-flagellation as usual.
                      But seriously, what happened happened. There are no casualties or injuries, and thank God. The rest will be clarified by the commission.
              3. +2
                April 29 2021 18: 42
                Quote: Nyrobsky
                There is a jamb not only in the rocket, but also in the video leak, when the circle of persons admitted to video recording and analysis of launches is limited.

                How do we know this leak is unintentional? If it has leaked into the network now, then this is either an old video or there is no secrecy.
                What are you waiting for? MO comments? They won't. Such launches are possible and occur not only in our country.
                1. 0
                  April 29 2021 22: 13
                  Quote: Canecat
                  How do we know this leak is unintentional?

                  I cannot argue, because there is such a technique. It only often happens that the allowed "leak" has a preventive direction, with the aim of introducing the enemy into "fornication and panic" despite the fact that there are no objective grounds for it. In this case, the demonstration of a failed start has the opposite effect, i.e. getting profitable "buns" is absent from the word at all. In a word, deliberate leakage for the purpose of influence is excluded, but leakage for the purpose of discrimination is more than obvious.
                  Quote: Canecat
                  What are you waiting for? MO comments? They won't. Such launches are possible and occur not only in our country.

                  I'm not waiting. Since there is nothing to comment on and it is necessary to understand. I do not argue that unsuccessful launches are possible and failures at the test stage are quite a place to be, even if we, even our potential adversary, then they are tests. But I don't think that the public demonstration of all the jambs during testing has become a good tradition for anyone.
                  1. 0
                    April 30 2021 11: 11
                    Quote: Nyrobsky
                    But I don't think that the public demonstration of all the jambs during the tests has become a good tradition for anyone.

                    ===
                    how to say, publicity is not always enough. on the other hand, the most important is the reaction to such publicity
                2. -1
                  April 30 2021 15: 33
                  Such launches are possible and occur not only in our country.

                  the fact of the matter is that this is a normal phenomenon. It’s not normal that a boy who’s crumpled starts to pretend that nothing happened and thinks that no one can smell.
                  I was most surprised by the attempt at the end of the article to make an absurd excuse and translate the arrows from the very fact of an unsuccessful launch to the scoundrels who filmed it and posted it on the Internet, and then completely merge the topic of the type, according to sofa experts, this is completely photoshop
              4. 0
                April 29 2021 23: 07
                Don't worry! There are no consequences and good! The rocket has a complex design, but the electronics are checked regularly, but the engines are not tested, external influences are possible during transportation and loading .... This is life! If you start talking about Soviet times ... your hair will stand on end ...
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. -5
          April 29 2021 17: 10
          And the chance was also very serious
        3. +1
          April 29 2021 18: 49
          Quote: Bashkirkhan
          It’s good that the rocket didn’t hit the side of the frigate.

          I was told about a similar case, but it was a long time ago, when missile weapons were not very common. Some kind of anti-ship missile was being tested. After the launch, after a while, the rocket began my course (which was a constant report) and changed it until it captured the ship with its locator, from which it was launched. As the officer said (at that time he was in the wheelhouse of the ship): ".. I didn't put my pants on, but it was scary ..."
          A rocket exploded between the masts.
      2. +7
        April 29 2021 16: 14
        Quote: OrangeBigg
        It's okay if the first pancake came out lumpy.

        But how to say, here then, as I understand it, there are no special complaints about the ship, there are more complaints about the missilemen. The "calibers" of the rocket are not old, how was this rocket received from the manufacturer, how was it stored, how was it checked, how was it prepared for launch?
      3. 0
        April 29 2021 21: 06
        Quote: OrangeBigg
        That's why they are teachings.

        There was no goal, so it didn't fly, self-destruction, everything was taken into account. laughing
        1. +3
          April 30 2021 14: 40
          we have no goals ???
      4. +7
        April 30 2021 00: 34
        Quote: OrangeBigg
        please. The first launch of the Caliber

        Smoked, falling rocket,
        and the calculation ran from her.
        who has ever seen this,
        will go to rocket men
        1. +2
          April 30 2021 14: 39
          baboons out of the blue
          deployed complex 200
          and from dawn to dusk
          no backlight - no capture
          and from dusk to dawn
          love techies for that ...
          when they wrote ...
      5. The comment was deleted.
      6. +2
        April 30 2021 14: 36
        that's what the technique is for, no, no, yes it will refuse
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. +4
        April 29 2021 15: 31
        Someone who is getting richer ..
      2. +10
        April 29 2021 15: 42
        And nothing that're coming out "Hammers" explode systematically, killing and crippling their own calculations? The explosion of "Hammer" is no longer an emergency incident. They have already been removed from production and from service, but then returned to production and service. There have already been dozens of launches of "Caliber", in particular, from ships of the Caspian Flotilla and from "Varshavyanka". So far, pah-pah-pah over the left shoulder, this is the first unsuccessful launch.
        1. -16
          April 29 2021 16: 49
          And nothing that're coming out "Hammers" explode systematically

          Do Calibers launch every day? In general, how many "Calibers" have been produced?
          1. +15
            April 29 2021 17: 05
            Do you want to compare the mortar and the "Caliber" missile in terms of combat power and complexity?
            This time. Back in the Great Patriotic War, the commander of the Leningrad Front G.K. Zhukov drew attention to the loss of mortar crews from double loading. He gave the task to Afanasyev, chief engineer of the Leningrad plant "Barrikada", to create a safety device against double loading. The fuse has been created. The losses have stopped. The LPR and DPR buildings do not have this problem either. These are two. It logically follows that "Forge on Rybalsky" (Poroshenko's plant) rivets a deliberate marriage with impunity. That's three. The result: 68 people died and about 200 were wounded from the Molotov bombings in seven years. That is, the leaders of Ukraine do not care deeply about their own soldiers. These are four.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. +4
                April 29 2021 18: 59
                Quote: private person
                Yes, nothing I do not want to just read funny comments "hurray patriots" who can only shout that everything is bad with them and how good it is with us.

                Yes, we are good - we are mass-produced and put into service modern models of high-tech weapons. And theirs is bad - they are just a mortar, which is essentially a pipe, they cannot normally make, when they could make no less (or even more) high-tech weapons than we now have.
              2. +3
                April 29 2021 20: 15
                Quote: private person
                Yes, I don’t want to just read the comments funny

                all-fledged people who are ready to jump out of their pants for joy when they see a speck in the eye of Russia, and point-blank do not see a beam in the eye of any other.
                1. The comment was deleted.
              3. +4
                April 29 2021 22: 13
                It is necessary to compare according to the complexity of the product. In the case of a mortar, it is necessary to manage to make an ordinary iron pipe self-exploding.
          2. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +1
          April 30 2021 15: 06
          the rocket did not fly, eco unseen. Not the first and not the last. Our "homies" exploded right in the mine and nothing, do not steam
      3. +8
        April 29 2021 16: 18
        Are you normal?) A mortar exploded near the army, which would then hollow out of it into residential buildings. What does joy have to do with it? This is karma.
      4. nnm
        +10
        April 29 2021 17: 22
        Indeed, how can you compare the failures of a primitive "stick-shooter", the technology of which has been perfected over 100 years of its use and a new type of high-tech weapons !? Definitely, things are comparable (no).
        I can advise you to go to Ukrainian sites - they are already celebrating a victory over the Russian Navy.
        1. -6
          April 29 2021 18: 35
          I can advise you to go to Ukrainian sites - they are already celebrating a victory over the Russian Navy.
          You know, I was not too lazy, I googled it. According to the keywords "shaposhnikov" and "caliber" from Ukraine, there is not a single news on 1 page, on 2 - one, fourth from the top. The news is neutral, without savoring and sucking. Most of the frigate itself and the truly hellish amount of modernization work. And also that, in addition to the launch of the "Caliber", artillery and torpedo firing were carried out and depth charges were dropped. That's it, there are no festivities. Looked at the comments. As many as 3 (three)! Yes, in a negative way, but without regret, "I'd better get on board." And now, for comparison, and you are not lazy, take a look at the news about the fall of the American drone and read the comments. That's where the rage is!
          1. nnm
            0
            April 29 2021 18: 46
            I did not quite understand your desire to compare the warm (on which page the news came up) with the soft (the number of our comments about the UAV crash) ...
          2. +3
            April 29 2021 21: 07
            Quote: val43
            You know, I was not too lazy to google it. According to the keywords "shaposhnikov" and "caliber" from Ukraine, there is not a single news on 1 page, on 2 - one, fourth from the top.

            Seriously? And already in YouTube they rage in full, on their state channels https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJ3qT3RWRtk. But as always. Gloom and boasting from them do not take, despite the fact that they themselves have nothing
            1. -5
              April 30 2021 02: 52
              Seriously? Is 2 + 2 a state channel?
          3. +1
            2 May 2021 10: 57
            2145 comments like "wow, rash fse" .... At the same time, attempts to write something against are harshly suppressed by deleting posts.

      5. 0
        April 29 2021 19: 29
        How many joyful screams were there when the mortar at the ho-x-lo-v shot


        Found something to compare, Hour / Face ...! fool

        The level of the mortar (which even the bearded men from ISIS * harp from gas cylinders) and the level of a high-tech long-range and high-precision missile with a mortar launch, it feels like the gas rudder is jammed .... They will fix it! Yes
        * - prohibited in Russia.
    3. +6
      April 29 2021 15: 40
      Judging by the tone of the comments, the process and the camera angle, these are calm test launches.
      1. -6
        April 29 2021 16: 11
        I don't know how reliable the video is as a whole. There is a question: why does the point of falling of the rocket into the water continue to smoke intensively until the end of the video? What, does a rocket float on the surface with the continuation of open burning? - What will the experts say?
        1. +7
          April 29 2021 16: 24
          Quote: andrew42
          What, does a rocket float on the surface with the continuation of open burning?

          Fuel - easily
          1. 0
            April 29 2021 20: 19
            Personally, I got the impression that after splashdown, the rocket spun for a couple of tens of seconds at a shallow depth (1-2 meters) at the point of impact. With the engine running. Then she began to sink, but also with the engine running. Could a marching man without air be able to work so interestingly?
            1. D16
              0
              April 30 2021 13: 39
              It was the launch of the layout. There is no propulsion engine.
            2. 0
              April 30 2021 17: 51
              In theory, there should be an oxidizing agent with the fuel.

              If so, it will burn under water
              1. 0
                3 May 2021 17: 26
                solid fuel booster will burn everywhere
        2. +4
          April 29 2021 16: 39
          The specialists from the VO left were writers. And they also say that the site is developing where I do not see the development point-blank. How many missile specialists have written in front of you, more than one commentary. But comments like "It worked well, okay, the rocket is new," and if it hadn't fallen into the water and flew into the side would have written sabotage. The starting accelerator apparently worked and already in the water near the rocket the main engine began to work, it seemed to me so.
          1. +1
            April 29 2021 17: 10
            The specialists from the VO left were writers. And they also say that the site is developing where I do not see the development point-blank. How many missile specialists have written in front of you, more than one commentary. But comments like "It worked well, okay, the rocket is new," and if it hadn't fallen into the water and flew into the side would have written sabotage. The starting accelerator apparently worked and already in the water near the rocket the main engine began to work, it seemed to me so.

            So on VO there are many commentators whose ears grow from behind the hill and no specialist here will rant, for obvious reasons)))
            1. -3
              April 29 2021 18: 43
              Excuse me, here it is interesting for the USSR for the death of the BOD "Brave" MRK "Monsoon" at least someone took off their epaulettes or, as they say in the army, "There are no guilty ones." So, in your opinion, if the rocket fell on the ship and there would be victims, they would write off the human factor of patriotism from this will no longer be. Here on the site for more than one year they have been breaking spears who are to blame for the fire at Kuza and PD-50. Bo, as you put it, "For obvious reasons," Vasya and Petya are to blame, not the bosses.
            2. -8
              April 29 2021 19: 46
              That you sho? Straight from behind the hillock? Ears - in the studio! Colleague, turn off conspiracy and turn on your brains. "Specialists" are not design bureau employees and its specific operators. These are people who had or are related to a similar technique. For example, the case with the Indonesian submarine. Agree, it will be more interesting for you to hear my opinion (I agree, not indisputable) than the opinion of a tanker?
          2. +3
            April 29 2021 19: 00
            Quote: Shiden
            The starting accelerator apparently worked and already in the water near the rocket the sustainer engine began to work so it seemed to me.

            Starting at the "Caliber" gunpowder, it burned in water and under water. A cruise engine needs air to operate, so it would not start in water.
            1. 0
              April 29 2021 19: 22
              You may be right, but if you look closely, the accelerator had two tongues of flame before it fell into the water, I don’t know the aircraft version also has an accelerator or there is a compressed air balloon to start the main engine.
          3. 0
            3 May 2021 17: 33
            Nobody needs it, this is a somewhat more closed area of ​​human knowledge than "blogging", again, if not a "civilian" (I wonder if there are any such?), A rocket specialist, you can get it, everyone understands this, I hope. So be content with the comments of experts in other fields :)
        3. +3
          April 29 2021 16: 58
          I don't know how reliable the video is as a whole. There is a question: why does the point of falling of the rocket into the water continue to smoke intensively until the end of the video? What, does a rocket float on the surface with the continuation of open burning? - What will the experts say?

          It depends on what kind of fuel is used there, but it can burn for quite a long time.
        4. +3
          April 29 2021 18: 19
          Quote: andrew42
          I don't know how reliable the video is as a whole. There is a question: why does the point of falling of the rocket into the water continue to smoke intensively until the end of the video? What, does a rocket float on the surface with the continuation of open burning? - What will the experts say?
          I think this video with a bad start is 100% real. I'm not a specialist, but this video somewhere at 0:26 - 0:27 clearly shows that on the third or fourth "somersault" a solid-propellant booster fell off the rocket, obviously the same as in the photo below.
          Not otherwise, this very "keg" is the reason for the "fire show" discussed here. I don’t know what happened after the fall with the rocket (it drowned anyway), but for some reason the accelerator after diving decided not to go to the bottom right away, but worked in full as a boiler for the upper layer of salt water, while cutting very spectacular circles and a respectable pair of surroundings. lol This can be seen very well in the video.
          This sometimes happens, not a faulty technique, alas, does not exist in nature.
        5. The comment was deleted.
      2. +1
        April 29 2021 18: 47
        Not test, but educational. That does not change the essence. I did not understand the essence of the boil at all request I did not keep statistics, but more than a dozen launches were carried out, including combat ones. It would be strange if at least one of them didn't screw up. And what happened at the "Shaposhnikov" ... Do you have any claims against him? Not. Well, that's it, the team is drinking and having fun.
    4. +3
      April 29 2021 15: 45
      Quote: OgnennyiKotik
      Only those who do nothing do not fail.

      Strange failures can occur due to sabotage:
      Diversion (from Latin diversio - deviation, distraction) - actions of sabotage groups (subunits) or individuals behind enemy lines to disable military, industrial and other facilities, to disrupt command and control, destroy communications, nodes and communication lines, destroy live strength and military equipment, influence on the moral and psychological state of the enemy.

      These are the doubts that the quote raises:
      In this case, the question arises, which of the filmmakers (or those to whom it got after filming) posted this video on the network and for what purposes - in order to be completely open?
      1. -3
        April 29 2021 16: 34
        Now the special services will be looking for the person who posted this video on the network and I do not envy him, since it is usually customary to hide the shame.
    5. +1
      April 29 2021 15: 56
      Let's write this missile launch failure as repelling an attack on a frigate by an enemy submarine.
    6. -7
      April 29 2021 16: 21
      The crew of the ship probably set aside a couple of KamAZ bricks while the rocket was falling
    7. -1
      April 29 2021 19: 31
      Quote: OgnennyiKotik
      This is the news about the MQ-8B.

      Why not be happy about the good news?
    8. 0
      April 30 2021 08: 23
      [quote = OgnennyiKotik

      That's what tests, what would test weapons. Only those who do nothing do not fail. I hope conclusions will be drawn and the necessary changes made. [/ Quote]
      The sailors, I think, have nothing to do with it. Most likely - a marriage in a rocket. It happens, what is really here. Therefore, no change. The rocket has been tested many times. Complaints to the quality control department of the manufacturer.
  2. +2
    April 29 2021 15: 06
    Uncalibrated caliber. Marriage or wanted to achieve this result? Sad joke ...
    And if the carrier would have fallen ... BOD only after repair. Good without injuries and damage to the materiel.
    But the task was not completed.
    1. +4
      April 29 2021 16: 49
      until the last moment, the video hoped that a second launch would follow. But I understood intellectually that these were tests / exercises, not a combat situation. In the case of the latter, the second launch would be obligatory, because the order must be carried out regardless of the circumstances.
      My best friend's mother is the chief chemical engineer at the plant that makes rockets. Author of almost 30 patents, which she created through trial and ERROR. She is 78 years old and is not RELEASED because she is the only specialist of her class in a (fairly) large city. She was invited for a long time and more than once to work in the largest production of the military-industrial complex. But she gave her whole life to her native plant. She was also mistaken, she said herself, but the mistakes were corrected and the result was a new technology.
      1. +2
        April 29 2021 18: 01
        And yes! I respect her very much for being a true communist. I have never met such people in my life. Everything for the Motherland is its main principle. After the plant (in the summer) she goes to the country house and delves into the beds. This spring we tried to dissuade her, but failed - we found a compromise. She minimized the number of beds necessary for the family, which is almost 70%. But for her 30%, she stood up as a wall)) Great man soldier
    2. D16
      +1
      April 30 2021 20: 55
      But the task was not completed.

      And what is the task of the test model? I got out of the UKSK, but I didn't get on the steamer. What else would you like?
      Py.sy. The site has become a trash heap for discussing fake news. But there are many visits. lol
      1. 0
        April 30 2021 21: 00
        Quote: D16
        And what is the task of the test model? I got out of the UKSK, but I didn't get on the steamer. What else would you like?

        I agree, this is not a fight. The next rocket will not be fired after.
        But live firing, I think, would have been limited to more than one launch. After all, granites like a swarm of problems to solve, probably so that.
        And there is also a special. warhead. These are usually taken out of the warehouse in front of the naughty.
        1. D16
          +1
          April 30 2021 21: 03
          What kind of live shooting? They shot a mock rocket to test ship systems. There, before the live firing, as before China.
  3. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. +12
    April 29 2021 15: 08
    but in general the question is why this video was published, no one asked that? After all, the shooting was carried out not by some blogger from the outside, but by the Ministry of Defense
    1. +3
      April 29 2021 15: 14
      Quote: japan-k
      .. why this video was published ...

      Hard to say.
      But it is clear that such launches are a reason for the hard work of specialists, and not for discussion in the media ...
  5. +9
    April 29 2021 15: 14
    One of the rudders did not work correctly, or there was a jam with the automatic system. There is always a risk of rejection or marriage.
  6. +4
    April 29 2021 15: 14
    Has anyone suffered? Not! And thank God! For the rest, they will figure it out and fix the malfunctions! As for the irony from the adjacent territories, let them first produce something similar and we'll see how it will (or will not) fly!
    1. for
      -6
      April 29 2021 16: 26
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      Has anyone suffered? Not! And thank God!

      What do you need to suffer?
  7. -5
    April 29 2021 15: 17
    The last shots look more like computer animation.
  8. +2
    April 29 2021 15: 22
    Who allows such frames to get into the public domain? At one time, for this, you could lose a lot. It is clear that the participants in the exercises themselves filmed, and they spread it. What for? Well, it didn't work properly. There are no casualties. We figured out the reasons, to whom they were supposed to report, and that's it.
    1. +5
      April 29 2021 15: 35
      Come on ... it would be better if the earth was full of rumors?
      There are as many such personnel, on the internet, count as everyone who is at least seriously engaged in something ... the main thing is that everyone has already understood that CALIBER, a working system that has successfully proven this, has repeatedly.
    2. +4
      April 29 2021 15: 48
      What's wrong? In the west, there is so much everything about accidents spread and not soared.
      1. D16
        +1
        April 30 2021 21: 08
        There was no accident.
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11QlVfGbQ9o
        A mockup was launched to test ship systems.
        1. +1
          2 May 2021 13: 15
          Yes, I understand, we must somehow explain this fireworks to the disenchanted. I don’t know why only. An accident is an inevitable percentage of the consequence of the training of weapon combat readiness.
          1. D16
            0
            2 May 2021 15: 06
            Well, it’s necessary to explain this fireworks to the discouraged. I don’t know why only.

            Disappointed need no explanation. They have already decided everything for themselves lol ... Moreover, your explanations for this case do not correspond at all.
            1. 0
              2 May 2021 15: 57
              But this I have no doubt that they have already decided and what it is appropriate to tell.
    3. +2
      April 29 2021 15: 54
      At one time, for this, you could lose a lot.


      Nowadays, for such high parties can lose - some part of the margin, some - the payment of consulting services. Publicity is the best cure for rot. Where does the habit of shouting "how can you! They'd have been shot before! This can't be forbidden!"
    4. +2
      April 29 2021 18: 55
      Quote: Stepan S
      Who allows such frames to get into the public domain? At one time, for this, you could lose a lot.

      Pfff ... after the shooting at the "Gosuzhas" building in Moscow, filming of the event from the windows of this building went online. Not only were the "faces" filmed, but mobile devices with cameras are generally prohibited from being carried there.
  9. +1
    April 29 2021 15: 22
    This information has already caused delight in the Ukrainian blogosphere.
    and don't give a damn about these sea diggers, they are "Morons," censorship "!" - Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. It is not necessary to pay attention to these "people" at all. Better when this does not happen. But from this no one is insured. Even those to whom "eaters of cellulite" have passed themselves on experiments.
  10. +2
    April 29 2021 15: 35
    Everything! We are waiting for the cries of the pro-Western all-propelling people and they will pour in about: Everything is bad in Russia, even the calibers are falling ... But they are quietly silent about the refusal of weapons from NATO and the United States, although there are more cases there.
    1. 0
      April 29 2021 15: 53
      already write above
    2. for
      -3
      April 29 2021 16: 30
      Quote: mojohed2012
      We are waiting for the screams of the pro-Western all-propelling people and

      So far, only yours are heard. Now they will pull themselves up and get their "pluses"
      1. +1
        April 30 2021 07: 47
        And you only appear for the plus signs on VO? Or does it happen when you just have a desire to share your opinion?
  11. -5
    April 29 2021 15: 36
    for such videos it is necessary to hang by the balls.
    1. +1
      April 29 2021 15: 44
      Quote: 501Legion
      for such videos it is necessary to hang by the balls.

      For the video, probably all the same it is not necessary, but for the fact that the video was made public - not only to hang it!
    2. -5
      April 29 2021 15: 50
      What else is needed? Is it worth reviving the crucifixion along the roads, or is it still not worth it?
      1. -3
        April 29 2021 16: 11
        with a crucifix, they overrun. but for a dozen years in a penitentiary institution, just right.
        1. -6
          April 29 2021 17: 00
          Well, why didn’t go overboard. Where it is possible for 10-k, it is possible for 20-k, and there it is not far to the crucifixion.
    3. for
      0
      April 29 2021 16: 35
      for such videos you need to hang by the balls

      Or maybe for a bad job. What a shame to admit your mistakes.
  12. +1
    April 29 2021 15: 39
    There are no signs of self-destruction on the footage, the Kyrgyz Republic did not understand that it had left the route. Whether it was a combat launch on another section of the route mission, there could have been funny consequences.
    1. +1
      April 29 2021 15: 45
      Quote: impostor
      There are no signs of self-destruction on the footage, the Kyrgyz Republic did not understand that it had left the route.

      Most likely, she did not even have time to get up on a combat platoon.
      1. +1
        April 29 2021 15: 52
        Most likely, she did not even have time to get up on a combat platoon.
        Normal, conditional submarine, conditional enemy, conditionally destroyed soldier
      2. D16
        0
        April 30 2021 21: 15
        Most likely, she did not even have time to get up on a combat platoon.

        A mockup for a combat platoon? Original laughing
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11QlVfGbQ9o
        1. 0
          1 May 2021 09: 07
          How do you know that it was a model?
          1. D16
            0
            1 May 2021 13: 21
            Link above.
            1. 0
              1 May 2021 13: 26
              On that one and on the other branch, it was clarified that some rubbish posted a video about the launch modelby renaming it to unsuccessful start.
              A classic Fake News style duck.
              In general, everything cleared up. hi
  13. +1
    April 29 2021 15: 42
    Or maybe this is a variant of testing the "Caliber" also as a deep bonba?
    1. +1
      April 29 2021 15: 48
      Well, for an underwater flight, like a flurry.
  14. 0
    April 29 2021 15: 47
    Fine. There is no 100% reliability. Accidents happen to everyone.
  15. -1
    April 29 2021 15: 54
    Ukrainians have already shot 1000 videos with glee. They have a national holiday there
    1. -2
      April 29 2021 17: 02
      At VO, they were just very happy about the crash on the side of an unmanned helicopter of non-partners and regretted that the whole ship was not damaged, and you are talking about some kind of videos of Ukrainians ...
      1. 0
        April 30 2021 01: 34
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJ3qT3RWRtk
        1. -5
          April 30 2021 04: 36
          What else? Except for the unknown 2 + 2.
        2. -2
          April 30 2021 12: 14
          Well, not very smart, so what?
  16. -3
    April 29 2021 15: 58
    It's great that the video has appeared! I believe that such stories can and should be laid out - and this is much more useful than ceremonial pictures. It can be seen that the work is going on, albeit with errors sometimes.

    It is a pity that our missiles do not have a self-detonation system when leaving the trajectory, or it did not work. So that in such cases there is no chance one and a half or two tons of fuel and explosives to get back in one piece.
    1. Aag
      0
      April 29 2021 16: 34
      "... It is a pity that our missiles do not have a self-detonation system when leaving the trajectory ..."
      Is this a statement, or sarcasm?
      "... or it didn't work ..."
      "I am tormented by vague doubts, Shpak has a tape recorder, the Ambassador has a medallion ..." (c)
      And the rocket did not go away, and the self-liquidator did not work ... There are doubts: either in the adequacy of the BTsVK firmware, or in the quality of the production of the product as a whole (this is for special specialists, technologists ... etc.)
      ... There have always been such incidents (I suspect that for a number of reasons, now much more often). But, the appearance of video in the public domain is a consequence of the failure in many other areas of the state structure ... (((
      1. 0
        April 29 2021 20: 27
        This is a commentary on what is happening: I think that from general considerations it would be good if such a system worked in this case. If it is there, it would be good to fix it, and if not, then it would be nice if it were added.

        By what data do you judge the frequency of incidents? Open source? Well, if all the information is closed, then there are no problems :) I would consider the rejection of publicity in general and the desire to keep everything secret to the right and left as a failure - these are just ideal conditions for more incidents. But if at least half of such problems are published, there will already be "public pressure" and at least how to twist, but you will have to bring the weapon in line with the picture required for propaganda. And this, it seems to me, is the best you can think of. When the missiles hit the target, the shells hit, the ships move.
        1. Aag
          -1
          April 29 2021 21: 06
          "... By what data do you judge the frequency of incidents? By open sources? Well, if all information is closed, then there are no problems :) I would consider a failure to refuse publicity in general and the desire to keep everything secret to the right and left are just ideal conditions for more incidents. "
          By experience. Service in the Armed Forces of the USSR, RF. By ALL indicators (except for the media), it does not get better there (((.
          About publicity, it's funny ... (if you are not an agent of opposing states). Most likely, just a person ... far from the state. secrets.
          And, so that I am not the only one to sleep anxiously, to the above, I finished my service as the commander of the preparation and launch group ("Topol").
  17. -5
    April 29 2021 16: 08
    AND...?
    Only one conclusion can be drawn from the video: since
    There have been no official reports of the incident that occurred during the missile launch.

    someone decided to substitute the leadership. request
  18. +5
    April 29 2021 16: 13
    A negative result is also a result.

    There are no casualties and material damage, but what is the reason for the refusal will be sorted out.
    1. 0
      April 29 2021 17: 09
      Too adequate commentary.
      You will be banned. laughing
  19. +3
    April 29 2021 16: 19
    I saw nothing special or terrible. Buhurt is ridiculous in the comments.
    Against the background of the number of unsuccessful launches of the Americans and NATO, we simply have no problems.
  20. 0
    April 29 2021 16: 32
    Well, anything can happen! But blows to hell in Syria from the Caspian Sea .. It was something for everyone! hi
    1. -5
      April 29 2021 17: 03
      These were practical tests of the CRBD.
  21. +2
    April 29 2021 16: 47
    Another emergency, that's all. There was a similar video from Africa with the use of the ballistic missile complex "Bal".
  22. -3
    April 29 2021 16: 49
    Unpredictable trajectory
  23. 0
    April 29 2021 16: 51
    The steering wheel is jammed.
  24. 0
    April 29 2021 16: 56
    and which of the sailors will tell you why the BOD was retrained into a frigate and not, say, a destroyer? what are the criteria?
    1. 0
      April 29 2021 18: 09
      Why was the BOD retrained as a frigate and not, say, a destroyer? what are the criteria?


      Everything is simple here:
      Class and type of vessel
      Large anti-submarine ship (frigate) of project 1155 《Frigate》
    2. -1
      April 30 2021 01: 36
      Quote: lazy
      and which of the sailors will tell you why the BOD was retrained into a frigate and not, say, a destroyer? what are the criteria?

      The main criterion for EM is strike weapons. The frigate is more about defense. The hull is old, they could not fully cram sufficient weapons into such a large displacement.
  25. +1
    April 29 2021 17: 00
    Nothing unusual. It happens to everyone. It's good that the rocket left the ship. But the boys ate fish soup from fresh fish ...)))
  26. +2
    April 29 2021 17: 07
    Quote: OrangeBigg
    In the video above, the Caliber rocket was regularly operated from the frigate Marshal Shaposhnikov.

    As usual, Alexander, worked as a starter. But then problems began with the control system. But nothing terrible happened. They will figure it out and bring it back to normal ...
  27. -1
    April 29 2021 17: 12
    Interestingly, and if from a special warhead another time it will work the same way ??? ))
  28. -3
    April 29 2021 17: 16
    It's good that she didn't come back like a boomerang! There the sailors, probably, then checked the robes for dryness.
  29. +1
    April 29 2021 17: 56
    without incident only with the one who does nothing. But how the video got into free views, the competent authorities must find out and draw organizational conclusions with the use of the criminal code.
  30. -1
    April 29 2021 18: 04
    Shooting from the air. Or a drone or a helicopter. The leak, one hundred pounds, deliberate, with the knowledge. The operator or the crew would not have fired so stupidly. The goal is - most likely the manufacturer will bend to lower the price tag or to the necessary personnel changes.
  31. 0
    April 29 2021 18: 07
    They also found a problem for me, everything happens in life, and the falling weather as a whole will not do a piece of iron.
  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. 0
    April 29 2021 18: 36
    Why, when the rocket starts, the launch sound appears instantly, and when flashes on the water surface with delays (as it should be). The video is short, why did you need editing?
  34. 0
    April 29 2021 19: 25
    This is a new modification for submarine shooting.
  35. +3
    April 29 2021 20: 43
    Quote: Dikson
    Interestingly, and if from a special warhead another time it will work the same way ??? ))

    And nothing will happen. The special warheads have fuses that will probably turn off not in the first seconds of the flight, when the SBCH is cocked.
  36. -4
    April 29 2021 21: 19
    spot, no one knows what, without changing the size, catches up with the ship ...))))))) well done))))
    1. +1
      April 30 2021 01: 42
      Quote: Alexander Manakov
      spot, no one knows what, without changing the size, catches up with the ship ...))))))) well done))))

      Where is it catching up? What are you talking about? This camera angle changes.
  37. 0
    April 29 2021 22: 51
    There is no impact on the water, there are no diverging circles on the water, it looks as if the rocket has landed, and has not crashed into the water. Again, with its mass, it should have quickly drowned after destruction, and fire and water give a large vapor cloud, which, again, is not visible in the video.
    In general, a strange video, filmed from one point, but the sound of the helicopter is not heard, and there are no people on the copters.
    1. 0
      April 30 2021 01: 41
      Quote: jonht
      There is no impact on the water, there are no diverging circles on the water, it looks as if the rocket has landed, and has not crashed into the water. Again, with its mass, it should have quickly drowned after destruction, and fire and water give a large vapor cloud, which, again, is not visible in the video.
      In general, a strange video, filmed from one point, but the sound of the helicopter is not heard, and there are no people on the copters.

      If there were brains, they would not ask such stupid questions. There is no impact from the fact that the hull dives into the water butt-end. An accelerator has plopped down nearby and the impact is clearly visible. What circles should you have seen from this distance? Can you imagine the size of the ship and the size of the rocket?
      1. 0
        April 30 2021 04: 05
        And you big-eyed, saw that the rocket "creator" entered the water, made out in the smoke ... Well, well .... And circles of 1,5 tons will be different. Unless the rocket in the air fell apart into small pieces. And I did not claim that this was a video editing, but I just drew attention to the fact that I am not watching, but it seems like I should.
        And about hitting the water, drop a weight of at least 16 kg from the bridge.
  38. +1
    April 29 2021 23: 34
    The missile has successfully hit an underwater target!
    1. nnmnhg
      -6
      April 30 2021 04: 42
      yes no, the rocket didn’t hit anything, it just fell down, and you just shrug it off, that's all
  39. 0
    April 29 2021 23: 50
    Quote: svp67
    The "calibers" of the rocket are not old, how was this rocket received from the manufacturer, how was it stored, how was it checked, how was it prepared for launch?

    And most importantly - WHO?
  40. 0
    April 30 2021 04: 29
    You never can tell
    Even a small percentage of commercially produced CDs can be defective.
  41. 0
    April 30 2021 04: 32
    ))) marriage happens in everything .. and Probability too! there is no terrible thing ...
  42. -3
    April 30 2021 06: 46
    They forgot how they laughed at the "Ukrainians" when, during joint exercises with the NATO fleet, their anti-aircraft missile began to "write pirouettes" in the air, and then fell into the water not far from the American destroyer ...
  43. qaz
    0
    April 30 2021 07: 20
    Oh, you fools ... This has been tested and the very successful new missile-torpedo "Caliber-M".
  44. -1
    April 30 2021 07: 40
    I am writing for those who are in the tank or just !!! Leaking such information is a malfeasance and must be thoroughly investigated and the perpetrators must be severely punished !!! Already on the Internet and on Ukrainian television channels, and I think that these shots are shown on the world as well and everyone just fizzles out with laughter !!! The same thing happened that happened to the aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov when he smoked half of Europe !!! This drain caused a huge damage to the prestige of Russian weapons and the entire country !!! For some of those who write here it seems that this is nothing and a simple oversight, but this is not so, because Russian weapons are sold to many countries and this year the loss of its sales amounted to twenty percent !!! The country's budget will not receive billions of dollars for various reasons, but also because of a useful idiot or a deliberate pest, because tomorrow he can leak top secret information !!!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      April 30 2021 19: 39
      Yes, yes, yes, yes, of course they forgot about you .. But next time we will definitely not shoot ..
  45. +1
    April 30 2021 09: 00
    About 36 years ago ... 37 years ago, a cruise missile from Kapustin Yar flew to the shore of the pond ... And no one shouted "Fsio is gone."
    A piece of iron broke inside the piece of iron. This happens thousands of times every hour all over the world.
  46. +2
    April 30 2021 09: 41
    Also a sensation for me. I remember in the curly years that we fired two missiles out of 14 missiles. The usual thing.
  47. 0
    April 30 2021 10: 23
    Yes, think of a problem ...
    Elon Musk won 10 StarShips already and does not care.
    Rockets, such a thing ...
  48. 0
    April 30 2021 10: 51
    And the next day, the Starship State Department will announce the disappearance of its reconnaissance submarine.
  49. 0
    April 30 2021 12: 51
    The saying "do not believe your eyes" is now more relevant than ever :)
  50. The comment was deleted.
  51. 0
    April 30 2021 15: 25
    At the same time, the question arises: which of those who filmed it (or those who received it after filming) posted this video online and for what purposes - for the purpose of complete openness? It can be assumed that this is one of the first launches, after which they worked on the errors. At the same time, some users called the frames “having signs of animation.”

    AH-ha-ha!
    1 of those who filmed posted this video online
    Yes, anyone, if they hadn’t posted a video from a drone, someone else would have posted it from a smartphone - there were hundreds of people there laughing at various posters like “Sefi, photo, Internet - wait for a “Hello” from the enemy” (who is in the know, he understood).
    2-and for what purposes - for the purpose of complete openness?
    Yes, because the owner of the video does not have it. I, too, would be a sinner and could not resist boasting about such a video.
    3-We can assume that this is one of the first launches, after which they worked on the errors
    Absolutely, it cannot be otherwise!
    4-At the same time, some users called the frames “having signs of animation”
    What kind of rockets Vladimir Vladimirovich showed at a conference a couple of years ago, these are the ones that fall))) I was recently completely accused of the fact that the 20-year-old analog photo I scanned and posted on the Internet, where I spent the night in the khibiny in the winter in the cold, was also Photoshopped.

    Now for the serious question. What was the point of this last phrase of the article?
    A rocket fell, but what difference does it make where and when? Equipment failure is a normal thing and a certain percentage is initially built into its operation: not every one will take off, not every one will hit the target, etc.
    Why was it necessary to seriously try to somehow justify the unsuccessful launch and still manage to reproach the author of the video, and then completely slip into “slander”.
    Doesn't anyone see that this is funny and absurd?
    It’s like in school, an excellent student is not afraid to tell that he got not an 5, but a bad grade. knows that anything can happen, how he received it is how he fixed it. But a C-grade student, who gets from a D to a C, constantly gets out of it: either he didn’t have a lesson, or they didn’t ask, or he forgot his diary, etc.
  52. 0
    April 30 2021 17: 37
    Normal, standard situation for testing. And it’s good that these videos are posted so that civilians can see how it really happens, that everything is not so simple.
  53. The comment was deleted.
  54. 0
    April 30 2021 17: 51
    Cool! So we have not yet seen the launch of hypersonic new products “10-20-30 or more years ahead” of a potential enemy. But most importantly, many have not yet understood how such an “advance” will turn out in the event of a single launch of a nuclear warhead against a real target.
  55. 0
    April 30 2021 19: 15
    The Anglo-Saxons are to blame!
  56. The comment was deleted.
  57. EBB
    0
    April 30 2021 21: 08
    Yes, this rocket was not supposed to go anywhere! The video shows the throw tests of the 91st rocket. They simply tested not the rocket itself, but the launcher for strength and rigidity. Trust a specialist!
  58. 0
    1 May 2021 06: 24
    What nonsense are you posting here? What is shown in the video are NORMAL, REGULAR THROWS TESTS!
  59. 0
    1 May 2021 09: 29
    Normal working moment during operation. And why does this “news” hang around for so long? Well, with a salvo out of ten, at least three were unsuccessful. And so - not worth a damn, as they say. No one is perfect in technology. It’s not for nothing that probability theory is everywhere there.
  60. The comment was deleted.
  61. 0
    1 May 2021 18: 02
    The caliber exploded, so what? In general, half of the Americans' Tomahawks do not reach the target!
  62. +1
    2 May 2021 11: 08
    Let me try to clarify. I don't know where the wording about a failed launch came from. But it and the video were carried all over the media, happily grunting and rubbing their palms.... In the USA, in general, on the forums there was a squeal of delight, and they also inserted a photo of a smoking “Koozy”... When I inserted a photo of “Freetown” with them, which has even more smoke it was - they wrote to me that this is different, this is a transition to afterburner... well, that's it....

    WHAT do we see (by the way, why didn’t we pay attention to the tone and negotiations of those commenting? Why weren’t they surprised by what happened? There was no “holy shit” and so on....

    There was a statement from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation regarding this video, but for some reason it passed by, and caused giggles like “well, you know, they’re lying.”

    Because in the video, a standard event usually carried out at a chemical plant is called an emergency release. That is, it was not an unsuccessful launch of 3M54, and throw tests of the rocket engine and its launch on a certain course were not expected. Because instead of the rocket itself there was a weight model. Such tests are carried out BEFORE combat missile launches. That is, the video of the successful launch of “Caliber” posted below by someone from the forum was filmed later...

    To confirm, I will post a video from my channel.... A similar test at Gorshkov. Only the Slegonets were not officially removed from the deck. I ask you to carefully look at the behavior of the rocket and compare.

  63. +1
    3 May 2021 00: 47
    I saw such launches 20 years ago. They were called a test for retracting a rocket from a ship when the control system failed.
  64. 0
    3 May 2021 17: 13
    a set of three videos, the last one shows a problem with the separation of the launch accelerator and the rocket, and... if strictly in order, then this is at least the 2nd launch :). But I believe more in throw tests, as they say here - a fully loaded rocket would burn a little stronger and longer
  65. The comment was deleted.
  66. 0
    5 May 2021 09: 09
    And how long can one linger over these footage of an unsuccessful launch, well, it’s just full of joy and some kind of puppyish delight, a common thing, such failures happen to everyone from time to time, but our “partners” also “successfully” launched a hypersonic missile not so long ago, and silence.
  67. 0
    6 June 2021 07: 26
    Complete 5iz9ets, how come, there is not even basic self-diagnosis before starting. It is immediately clear that the reliability of weapons is 100500 percent.