Military Review

Vietnamese Soha: When Russia quickly moved its army to the western border, NATO troops did not budge

48

A columnist for the Vietnamese newspaper Soha reflects on the behavior of NATO troops against the background of checking the combat readiness of the Russian army. Let us recall that Russia was deploying impressive forces and assets to its southwestern borders, including two armies. These maneuvers caused, as they say in diplomatic circles, "concern in the camp of Western partners." Russia was immediately demanded to "withdraw its troops from the Ukrainian borders."


On the pages of the Vietnamese Soha material is presented, which says that against the background of the massive transfer of Russian troops to the borders of Ukraine, "NATO units remained motionless." Except for a few exceptions in the form of the transfer of a certain number of aircraft to Poland and the British decision to send two of their ships to the Black Sea.

Vietnamese columnist:

I will clearly state the following point: When Russia was carrying out a rapid maneuvering of the army and its transfer to the western border, NATO troops did not budge.

The author writes that this can be a wake-up call for Kiev. From the article:

Russia demonstrated its capabilities and warned Ukraine that an attack on Donbass would be the beginning of the end of Ukraine as a state. However, Kiev, apparently, decided to ignore this message.

The Vietnamese observer writes that Kiev seriously hopes that NATO troops will indeed fight for Ukraine, but these hopes are unfounded, as the past events have shown.

From the material on the pages of Soha:

It appears that the United States and NATO have several goals. The first is the Ukrainian attack on Donbass, the second is the destabilization in Belarus, and the third is the protracted war on the southern borders of Russia, in Nagorno-Karabakh.

The Vietnamese observer believes that Putin stopped such inclinations of opponents - the rapid transfer of troops, and earlier - by negotiations with Yerevan and Baku. And in his message to the Federal Assembly and during telephone conversations with Biden, he also raised the issue of the attempt on the life of President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko being prepared by the Western special services.



Vietnamese author:

The President of Russia has shown to the whole world that the West is ready to use terrorist methods to solve its geopolitical tasks.
Photos used:
VKontakte / Ministry of Defense of Russia, website of the President of Russia
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. rocket757
    rocket757 April 29 2021 13: 32
    +9
    Vietnamese Soha: When Russia quickly moved its army to the western border, NATO troops did not budge
    The fact takes place, and the rest ... well, everything is very vague, except for one thing, NATO will not help, anyone, in the conflict with Russia.
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 April 29 2021 13: 47
      +9
      Yes, everything is quite definite.
      We were preparing a "domino effect".
      But it turned out - zilch one ...
      1. Anachoret
        Anachoret April 29 2021 13: 56
        -9
        Yes, everything is quite definite.
        We were preparing a "domino effect".
        But it turned out - zilch one ..


        May and summer are going to be hot. All this political fuss of the West may result not in Zelensky's frontal attacks on Donbass, but in armed neutrality to squeeze Transnistria. This is a very real scenario of geopolitical humiliation for Russia.
        Hence the tour of Ze and the Ministry of Internal Affairs glinomes in the southern regions.
        Indeed, in the current state of affairs in the scenario with Transnistria, the Russian Armed Forces will have to: 1) land on the unfriendly coast of the Odessa region, 2) request a "humanitarian corridor" from Ukraine for the passage of troops in support of Transnistria. Both options will be politically challenging to implement.
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 April 29 2021 14: 11
          +5
          Sandu now has his own circus ... the collecT from the skakuasiya slipped a big pig to her ...
          If this "card" is played correctly, she will have very little time for all the other plans and deeds.
        2. Roma 1977
          Roma 1977 April 30 2021 07: 49
          0
          That is, whatever one may say: the destruction of the state of Ukraine is an urgent need.
        3. core
          core 3 May 2021 19: 16
          +1
          I am ashamed to ask, who and with what forces will squeeze out transnistria? really Romanians?
          so for the destruction of decision-making centers in Bucharest, Ukrainian corridors and landings in Odessa are not needed.
          We will not be ashamed of it, a missile and bomb strike, and if you so want to land, then let's go straight to the constant. 250 km and Bucharest. :)
          1. Anachoret
            Anachoret 4 May 2021 23: 58
            0
            just in May-June, according to legend (or almost until August), NATO exercises were announced, for which a couple of tens of thousands of "corpses" and hundreds of units of military equipment were thrown over, the exercises will be in the Baltic states and Romania, by the way.

            and "temporary anarchy" in Moldova looks like the country came under the control of the hard-working black hands of a CIA officer (like the US ambassador to Moldova)

            and you naively believe that the NATO sortie will be stopped by missiles. and to transfer troops through Moldova to Transnistria in conditions of anarchy is a simple task. I had a chance to pass through the territory of Romania in 2005 or 2006, when their parliament was also dissolved. The country was a real Gulyaypole and customs officers even printed out transit cargo in the hope of stealing the loot. And they were ready to do everything for cash))
            So, such an unstable field in Moldova is now just convenient muddy water for dark deeds.
      2. rocket757
        rocket757 April 29 2021 14: 08
        +9
        Plans are being prepared .... then, now, then, but the situation is changing and the plans go down the drain.
        The stronger, more independent, more united Russia is, the more of their plans will fly to where they belong.
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 April 29 2021 16: 27
          +6
          The stronger, more independent, more united Russia is, the more of their plans will fly to where they belong.

          For our victory! drinks
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 April 29 2021 17: 36
            +6
            We will win if / when we get ALL TOGETHER!
            1. Gardener91
              Gardener91 April 30 2021 15: 14
              +1
              Quote: rocket757
              We will win

              To begin with, let them lag behind and go through the forest.
              1. rocket757
                rocket757 April 30 2021 19: 13
                +1
                These are unrealizable hopes ... they themselves will not lag behind.
  2. Roman 57 rus
    Roman 57 rus April 29 2021 13: 32
    0
    Well, at least someone outside of Russia writes about this ...
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 April 29 2021 13: 49
      +3
      Well, at least someone outside of Russia writes about this ...

      I am sure they look with interest and write.
      In order to receive positive answers to our various requests, we ourselves need to demonstrate decisiveness, firmness and consistency. bully
    2. Ross xnumx
      Ross xnumx April 29 2021 14: 09
      +4
      Quote: Roman 57 rus
      Well, at least someone outside of Russia writes about this ...

      Why not? The memory of the American carpet bombing and the famous Vietnamese pilots Li Si Tsin, Ku Ni Tsin, Vdo Vi Tsin and many others is still alive.
      True officially Vietnamese comrades Gentlemen of Crimea did not recognize ... request
      1. Gardener91
        Gardener91 April 30 2021 15: 16
        0
        Quote: ROSS 42
        True, the Vietnamese comrades of the Crimea did not officially recognize ...

        And Cam Ran down the tail (((
  3. Cananecat
    Cananecat April 29 2021 13: 33
    -5
    When Russia carried out rapid maneuvering of the army with its transfer to the western border, NATO troops did not budge.

    What did the author want to say? That when we arrange maneuvers, the West "has taken a breath in the goiter," or the West has deliberately dulled it, knowing that nothing will happen except maneuvers?
    1. Ross xnumx
      Ross xnumx April 29 2021 14: 13
      +9
      Quote: Canecat
      What did the author want to say?

      The author wanted to say that Russia near its borders can and will do whatever it pleases. And quickly, unquestioningly and on time. And the rabid fighters from the West will not budge (so as not to snatch out the "luli").
      But, he said it so as not to incur anger "from above" ...
    2. bulvas
      bulvas April 29 2021 18: 11
      +5
      Quote: Canecat
      What did the author want to say? That when we arrange maneuvers, the West "has taken a breath in the goiter," or the West has deliberately dulled it, knowing that nothing will happen except maneuvers?


      The fact that no one is going to fight with Russia for Ukraine

      I suspect that the main part of the Armed Forces of Ukraine would not.
      However, they did not.
      *
      If you have to enter Ukraine, the first step is to cut off all escape routes from Ukraine.
      Who needs to be buried right away, who needs to be caught and judged visually.
      It is better to clean up immediately on the sly than to catch the "partisans" later.
    3. Gardener91
      Gardener91 April 30 2021 15: 19
      0
      Quote: Canecat
      What did the author want to say? That when we arrange maneuvers, the West "has taken a breath in the goiter"

      What then was the howl from every western iron?
  4. Trapp1st
    Trapp1st April 29 2021 13: 35
    -1
    In general, a mediocre article, the NATO movement will be in May-June, and now preparations have begun, the pulling together of forces, logistics, and the transfer.
    It appears that the United States and NATO have several goals. The first is the Ukrainian attack on Donbass, the second is the destabilization in Belarus, and the third is the protracted war on the southern borders of Russia, in Nagorno-Karabakh.
    But it is difficult to disagree with this, ideally a civil war in Belarus.
  5. Overlock
    Overlock April 29 2021 13: 40
    -4
    A columnist for the Vietnamese edition of Soha reflects ...

    Oh, those Asian analysts! Everyone thinks about geopolitics
  6. Skay
    Skay April 29 2021 13: 44
    0
    Author, photo from the bulldozer?
    1. ammunition
      ammunition 1 May 2021 02: 06
      0
      Quote: Skay
      photo from the bulldozer?

      winked Normal BTR70. we "lived" in them 36 years ago. Not a bad "car".
  7. Virus-free crown
    Virus-free crown April 29 2021 13: 46
    +2
    Russia as a sovereign state has the RIGHT to move its troops as it pleases ... It's just that they are not fools in NATO and understand that such a demonstrative action of the Russian Federation for NATO does not threaten even once)))

    But let the clowns think ... laughing
  8. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 April 29 2021 13: 51
    -1
    Today it is a surprise for NATO, it turns out that 300 troops took part in the check, and as they believe, if they counted only 000, this is according to Borel.
  9. Ulrih
    Ulrih April 29 2021 13: 59
    -12%
    And what kind of publication is it? How big is the audience, the quality of publications, etc.?

    And what about Karabakh? What came of the supposedly planned "protracted war"? Ahh, yes, nothing, the Azerbaijanis, with the help of one NATO member, won quickly. Probably, Nata's insidious plans were hidden from Turkey: D

    By the way, both the observer and the local commentators have a "nice NATO" and the fact that the NATO troops did not move at all ...
    1. Glory to Berkut
      Glory to Berkut April 29 2021 15: 42
      +5
      Quote: Ulrih

      By the way, both the observer and the local commentators have a "nice NATO" and the fact that the NATO troops did not move at all ...

      Goes great. Hyenas can flock to the weak. Like Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria. And it's scary to rock the Russian bear. Especially when the bear pumped up muscle, sharpened its claws and bared its teeth.
      1. Ulrih
        Ulrih April 29 2021 15: 55
        -9
        Yes, a comfortable position, in any case someone else is to blame. Reminds agitation of Soviet times, which depicts a peaceful worker / peasant, and around some bourgeois grinning.
        By the way, if you take Soviet / Russian history, there have never been attacks on weaker / smaller ones from "peace-loving" Russia, right? Finnish, the same Afghanistan, the Baltic countries in 1940, Poland in 1939, revolutionary France (just your remark about hyenas fits), again the partition of Poland, etc.
        1. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky April 29 2021 17: 54
          +9
          Quote: Ulrih
          Yes, a comfortable position, in any case someone else is to blame. Reminds agitation of Soviet times, which depicts a peaceful worker / peasant, and around some bourgeois grinning.
          By the way, if you take Soviet / Russian history, there have never been attacks on weaker / smaller ones from "peace-loving" Russia, right? Finnish, the same Afghanistan, the Baltic countries in 1940, Poland in 1939, revolutionary France (just your remark about hyenas fits), again the partition of Poland, etc.

          And where were your great-grandfathers and grandfathers at that time? They shit at the Soviets at night with zeal and affection, or they were also involved in the events you listed by virtue of living in the same territory, which is also evidenced by the fact that you speak well in Russian. Or you, disdainfully abandoning your ancestors, immediately drew like a new copper penny, having been born from the parent number 1 of "democracy" and parent number 2 of "nezalezhnosti"? I don’t remember who said, but it sounds something like this - "If you fart into your past, then this past will hit you with a volley of guns", so this is about you, newly-minted Russophobes.
          1. Ulrih
            Ulrih April 30 2021 09: 56
            -3
            What does my knowledge of the language and especially my ancestors have to do with what I wrote? I know both English and French, so what?
            1. Swordserg
              Swordserg 1 May 2021 21: 22
              +1
              And then you can see. You probably know only bad things about Russia, but you deliberately underestimate and ignore the sins of your idols. The examples of Finnish, Baltic states and Poland you listed cannot be compared with the partition of Russia after the revolution, as well as the destruction and capture of the weaker that Europe carried out in America and Africa. The same Poles gladly attacked and seized the territories of Russia in the 16-17 centuries until they outlived their usefulness as a state. The Baltic States were never free and lay now under the Germans, now under the Swedes. And nothing, for some reason, those invaders are not called. However, the occupation was strange, the occupants built factories and plants in 50 years, but nothing in 30 years of freedom under the EU flag. All have collapsed and are dying out. So you would go Ulrich with your arguments and examples in three letters.
              1. Ulrih
                Ulrih 1 May 2021 23: 26
                -2
                What idols? What are you talking about? The initial post to which I replied was about how all the byaks around and Russia is all in white, as if Russia / Soviet Union did not attack the weaker ones. The fact that the Poles were a superpower once does not change the fact about which I wrote. Also, the fact that the Baltic countries were under someone's dominion also does not justify Russia in any way. And what does never mean? The same Lithuania was a full state for a long time.
                Where did you get that the Swedes or Germans are not called in any way? And the remark about 50 years, etc. is generally ridiculous, you might think that without the Soviets nothing would be built. And why does it seem to you that there is nothing for 30 years of freedom? Because you are "fed" with this misbehavior?
                1. Swordserg
                  Swordserg 12 May 2021 15: 04
                  0
                  Name examples of attacks on weaker ones. Let's compare when and why there were wars between Russia and the weaker ones and what are the consequences of finding these countries as part of an empire and an alliance in comparison with what the West did with the conquered
                  1. Ulrih
                    Ulrih 12 May 2021 15: 16
                    0
                    I voiced examples earlier right there. You answered in the style of "and you blacks are beaten" and not in essence, so I see no reason to argue. If one criminal killed 1 person and the other 3, then the actions of the second in no way mean that the first is good and just fine.
                    1. Swordserg
                      Swordserg 12 May 2021 15: 19
                      0
                      Your examples suck and are deceitful, as I pointed out to you, and cannot be compared with crimes against humanity by Americans and Europeans. So do not be engaged in denigrating the country and distorting the facts.
                      1. Ulrih
                        Ulrih 12 May 2021 15: 36
                        0
                        Where are they lying? What does the case of someone else (Europe, America, China or aliens) have to do with the fact that Russia is also not a gift for its neighbors?
                        How did you write "The Baltics have always been under someone" - is this an argument? Does this somehow justify any invader? It is you, at least in this example, are lying, since the same Lithuania was for a long time an independent state.
                      2. Swordserg
                        Swordserg 13 May 2021 22: 37
                        0
                        How long is this for a long time? )))) 20 years after the revolution?)) If you are talking about the polish, then the union with Poland. And again, who granted freedom to the Chukhonts from the Teutonic and Livonian orders? Where are free estonia and Latvia? Until the 20th century, such did not exist. And only thanks to the revolution and Lenin they were given freedom. And when the West gave freedom to the colonies in Africa and Asia? And himself? In what place is Russia not a gift to its neighbors? In your opinion, Britain, France and Turkey could climb wherever they wanted with weapons in hand, but the Russians couldn't? If you mean the conquest of Siberia, then for a start, remember the raids of the Tatars from the east and south to Moscow, the devastation and enslavement of the population. And who raided Europe that they allowed themselves to destroy part of the indigenous population of America and use slave labor until the 20th century? Who! So there is no need to put Russia and the West on the same shelf. Completely different ways of interacting with neighbors. You should just read what they write on Western forums why the world is obliged to thank Russia and not what they are doing. I'm only sure you won't do it. You really don't need it. Vai likes the lie.
  10. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor April 29 2021 18: 08
    +2
    with the help of one NATO member
    So the Armenians themselves jumped for which they pay.
  • Prisoner
    Prisoner April 29 2021 14: 24
    +6
    winked It’s a pity that they didn’t move. It would be nice if they rushed to the English Channel.
  • Antagonist
    Antagonist April 29 2021 14: 58
    +11
    The Vietnamese observer writes that Kiev seriously hopes that NATO troops will indeed fight for Ukraine, but these hopes are unfounded, as the past events have shown.

    The Vietnamese observer is right. NATO will not fight for the Kiev authorities. Only in Kiev they cannot grasp this fact in any way. Everyone believes that the West will help them.
  • Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 29 2021 15: 44
    +2
    No matter how the NATO top twitches and squeals, their soldiers and officers do not have the slightest desire to expose their heads to the bullets or whatever will fly to him. It's good at all sorts of forums and events with a good lunch and wine, telling tales of how brave and skillful they are. And the case of trench dirt and blood will touch, all this arrogance will instantly evaporate. VVP said correctly, we will hit the decision-making centers, let them find out how much a pound is dashing.
    1. Ulrih
      Ulrih April 29 2021 16: 08
      -5
      Purely for the sake of interest - what are your beliefs based on what desires of NATO soldiers and officers? Why do you think that the professional military is doing it?
      1. Ros 56
        Ros 56 April 29 2021 16: 14
        +4
        Precisely because the professional military understands what war is better than all these cheap punters. Butting with Russia is not driving the Papuans across the desert. And most importantly - why put your forehead under the bullets? Really for these stupid Banderlog?
  • Azat Mambetov
    Azat Mambetov April 30 2021 04: 08
    +1
    Russia is constantly on the defensive. So the "war" cannot be won. We must attack where we can in order to hold down the enemy's forces. Sooner or later, the "defense" will break through.
    1. Roma 1977
      Roma 1977 April 30 2021 07: 53
      +1
      Russia is not on the defensive. Russia responds asymmetrically, unexpectedly for an adversary who had other plans. The Crimean operation was like a sickle in the balls, the actions of the Russian Federation in the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict only led to the strengthening of the Russian Federation, instead of the planned pushing of Russia out of the Transcaucasia.
  • AlexeyA
    AlexeyA April 30 2021 08: 25
    0
    Only the army fights against the army. It is impossible to simulate firing points where issues can be resolved in a different way. The opponent's name is not written in the statutes of the organizations. Before you act, you need to find out who is making the attack. Otherwise, it will be shooting at sparrows. You cannot put NATO as an enemy.
  • Olegkh
    Olegkh April 30 2021 19: 46
    -1
    It's simple - the transfer of troops is money. And just like that, only rich Russia can afford to shoot them at the skating of divisions here and there.