The most heavily armed modification of the KamAZ-43269 "Shot" armored vehicle was spotted in Syria

Among the armored vehicles used by various regular and irregular armed formations in the Middle East, the Russian one is considered one of the most reliable, effective and easy to operate, therefore it is in great demand. In particular, the most heavily armed modification of the KamAZ-43269 "Shot" armored vehicle was recently seen in Syria.

It is reported "Russian newspaper"referring to information from social networks.

The photo that appeared on the Internet shows the Vystrel armored vehicle, presumably equipped with an MB2-04 combat module. The armament of this module consists of a 2 mm 42A30 automatic cannon and 12,7 mm Kord machine guns and a 7,62 mm PKTM. It is also possible to install an AG-17 automatic grenade launcher.

To ensure the required firing accuracy on the move, an electromechanical two-plane weapon stabilizer is used. In the dark, a laser searchlight is used to aim at targets.

This armored vehicle is capable of carrying up to 9 people. On the highway, it can reach speeds of up to 90 kilometers per hour. Without refueling, it is capable of covering a maximum distance of 1,1 thousand kilometers. The mass of the KamAZ-43269 "Shot" armored car in the running order is 12 tons.

Comments

[yfast]

In the dark, a laser searchlight is used to aim at targets

... For any ATGM to be "shot and forgotten."

[loki565]

... For any ATGM to be "shot and forgotten."

What is it like?)))

[Professor]

Quote: loki565

... For any ATGM to be "shot and forgotten."

What is it like?)))

It doesn't. Comrad blurted out without thinking.

[Petrik66]

Have you not seen how laser sights (such laser pointers) look in Hollywood movies, imagine what a laser projector looks like !!!!!!!! So people are worried that babai on such a mega-pointer and lupanut at night with a gun)))))))

[Servisinzhener]

Have seen. Especially in scenes where he is present there is a slight haze. So that you can see how the beam goes. And almost always visible lasers are used.

[uav80]

Judging by the photo, the MB2-04 module is standing, TKN-4GA-03 is already installed there, it does not really need a searchlight, it can work with the thermal imaging channel

[Aleks tv]

Quote: uav80

Judging by the photo, the MB2-04 module is standing, TKN-4GA-03 is already installed there, it does not really need a searchlight, it can work with the thermal imaging channel

Hello.

You are right, but I will correct you a little, this machine does not have a thermal imager:

The photographs show different tower installations.
On the first - something like MA 7 (8,9).
On the second, yes - MB2-04.
On the latter, indeed, TKN-4GA is installed.
- In modifications "01" and "02" there is an image intensifier, ie Infrared.
- The TKN-4GA-03 modification has a thermal imager.

A fighting compartment with a sight of the letters "2" or "01" is installed on the machine with 02 photos with the soldier.
In the upper part of the tower, instead of an IR illuminator, LP-1 is installed on mounts, this is "laser spotlight".
This is how the creator calls it - Rostov OMZ.
High-power infrared source of illumination of targets.
Here's a leapfrog in the names.
I'm freaking out myself ...
The joke is simple.


In the photo: LP-1

[Sergei N 58912062]

Quote: Aleks tv

Quote: uav80

Judging by the photo, the MB2-04 module is standing, TKN-4GA-03 is already installed there, it does not really need a searchlight, it can work with the thermal imaging channel

Hello.

You are right, but I will correct you a little, this machine does not have a thermal imager:

The photographs show different tower installations.
On the first - something like MA 7 (8,9).
On the second, yes - MB2-04.
On the latter, indeed, TKN-4GA is installed.
- In modifications "01" and "02" there is an image intensifier, ie Infrared.
- The TKN-4GA-03 modification has a thermal imager.

A fighting compartment with a sight of the letters "2" or "01" is installed on the machine with 02 photos with the soldier.
In the upper part of the tower, instead of an IR illuminator, LP-1 is installed on mounts, this is "laser spotlight".
This is how the creator calls it - Rostov OMZ.
High-power infrared source of illumination of targets.
Here's a leapfrog in the names.
I'm freaking out myself ...
The joke is simple.


In the photo: LP-1

[Sergei N 58912062]

Quote: uav80

Judging by the photo, the MB2-04 module is standing, TKN-4GA-03 is already installed there, it does not really need a searchlight, it can work with the thermal imaging channel

[KCA]

Well, yes, after all, it is known that all ATGMs and all guidance systems operate at the same laser frequency, which requires a range from infrared to advanced X-ray, and the best thing is to launch missiles according to a Chinese laser pointer, they are most often used

[Barberry25]

This is when the Barmaleev got the 3rd generation ATGM?

[Barberry25]

but in general the car is good, for the conditions of Syria, that's the very thing, especially considering that the mine resistance is even higher there ... the dislike of our army for it is incomprehensible

[loki565]

Such vehicles are usually owned by PMKashniki like all sorts of armored urals, pikes, etc.

[Barberry25]

Well, as I understood at one time, the shots were bought for the army in a limited batch, and then they were shoved into Syria, but there, whoever had time, sat down ... although for the price and performance characteristics, armored personnel carriers are better

[Nikon O'Conor]

for the price and performance characteristics, better than armored personnel carriers

The shot, if I'm not mistaken, is in the same class as the BRDM.
The APC is a slightly different vehicle.

[Barberry25]

rather, it is closer to the MRAP, because, unlike the BRDM, the landing is carried

[Nikon O'Conor]

Landing ... an elastic concept, jump out and engage in a fleeting battle or disembark, take positions and fight back, wait for reinforcements. MRAP is just from the latest version. Military armed transport, like the armored personnel carrier. The shot is probably not in demand among the troops, since they do not see the conditions for use. Lucky landing, but not carrying additional equipment / ammunition ...
In general, a machine of undefined tasks.

[Barberry25]

there are bulk places inside ... as well as powerful weapons ... but about "the army does not see the tasks" ... so let me remind you that the army wrapped up the BTR-90 due to the lack of a ramp and began to buy the BTR-82 ... with a similar problem, but with weaker weapons and armor .. and now attempts have begun to solve the problems that have been created .. and they want to put mounted armor and ATGMs to hang ... As a result, an attempt to catch up with the TTX BTR-90 .. so here too .. in fact the same Tiger trying to catch up to TTX Shot

[Nikon O'Conor]

The question is, of course, a difficult one. But in my opinion, the shot should be in the military police and at the border guards, for their tasks - a good car. In the troops .... I don't think so. Honestly - I even write to you and doubt my words ...

And there are such machines in the Strategic Missile Forces and border guards.

Yes, we did not have enough of this in the Strategic Missile Forces for the divisions of calculating the gain.

[Victorio]

Quote: Barberry25

there are bulk places inside ... as well as powerful weapons ... but about "the army does not see the tasks" ... so let me remind you that the army wrapped up the BTR-90 due to the lack of a ramp and began to buy the BTR-82 ... with a similar problem, but with weaker weapons and armor .. and now attempts have begun to solve the problems that have been created .. and they want to put mounted armor and ATGMs to hang ... As a result, an attempt to catch up with the TTX BTR-90 .. so here too .. in fact the same Tiger trying to catch up to TTX Shot

===
Interestingly, such an extension of the nose / engine forward (which is understandable with a bevel) does not greatly affect stability and patency?

[Barberry25]

not much, but not weakly it increases mine protection)

[Blackgrifon]

Quote: Barberry25

Well, as I understood at one time, the shots were purchased for the army in a limited batch, and then to Syria

Not certainly in that way. According to open sources, the limited batch was only about 200 pieces. The army continues to serve and modernize. A small amount (literally a few cars) went to the Syrians as slop and a few to PMCs.

[Grits]

Quote: loki565

Such vehicles are usually owned by PMKashniki like all sorts of armored urals, pikes, etc.

And there are such machines in the Strategic Missile Forces and border guards.

[Zaurbek]

..... and shone in Donbass

[Barberry25]

By the way, I'm wrong along the way .. on the Lost Armor they write that the car is new and modernized, because with such a BM we did not have + spaced out on the door

[NEOZ]

Quote: Barberry25

the dislike of our army for him is incomprehensible

low efficiency in combined arms ... intended for local conflicts (low intensity).

[Barberry25]

taking into account that it will be better than the BTR-80 ... in terms of firepower and armor .. I would not agree .. sooner "uuuu, this is an BTR-40, why do we need this!" .. Very often the military thinks illogical

[NEOZ]

Quote: Barberry25

taking into account that it will be better than the BTR-80 ... in terms of firepower and armor .. I would not agree .. sooner "uuuu, this is an BTR-40, why do we need this!" .. Very often the military thinks illogical

heavily armed modification of the KamAZ-43269 "Shot" armored vehicle.
will she be able to overcome the trenches of the full profile? .... here the BTR80 can!

[Barberry25]

there is a three-axle Bulat and no one drives through the trenches for a long time

[NEOZ]

Quote: Barberry25

there is a three-axle Bulat and no one drives through the trenches for a long time

Yes? and why?

[Barberry25]

because when the equipment approaches the trenches, there are no longer trenches, but a lunar landscape ... even more so that this armored car has passed all the necessary tests ... the passability there is at the level of the same tiger, only higher

[NEOZ]

Quote: Barberry25

Very often the military thinks illogical

what do you think the heavily armed modification of the KamAZ-43269 "Shot" armored vehicle is closer to which armored vehicle:
1.tank
2. BMP
3. APC
?

[Barberry25]

and you ask the Ministry of Defense .. why do they want to hang ATGMs on the armored personnel carrier and why they raise the level of protection for it ..

[NEOZ]

Quote: Barberry25

why do they want to hang ATGMs on the armored personnel carrier and why they raise the level of protection for it ..

ATGM - because they want to increase firepower! it's not expensive...
the level of protection - because the armored personnel carrier began to play the role of an infantry fighting vehicle in low-intensity conflicts.

[Barberry25]

and in the end what? almost an armored personnel carrier-90, which will not be cheaper, and maybe more expensive, but worse armored and armed ... either 30 mm + 2 bassoons against Bakhchi do not really pull

[NEOZ]

Quote: Barberry25

and in the end what?

I think I put everything on the shelves for you !!! what is not clear to you?

[Barberry25]

I, too, MO messed up at one time with the decision "let's take the budget, and then we will buy a super-duper new car" ... They just screwed up with BMP-3 in the same way .. now they are actively waving their paws and buying BMP-3 and they promise that the BMP-3M will still take and modernize the BMP-2 and it is not clear what they are portraying with the "Basurmanin" ... In general, a clear development strategy is not about the army ... The army can prescribe in the charter how much toilet paper a day is needed, but can't decide on the purchase of equipment .. I'm generally surprised how the same bmd-4m could start buying .. but looking at the leapfrog around the Sprut-sdm I understand that the Four were unrealistically lucky ..

[Cananecat]

Hmm ... and protection in the form of active armor is not provided?

[loki565]

Hmm ... and protection in the form of active armor is not provided?

Hmm ... is this a tank? or BMP? although not every infantry fighting vehicle can be equipped with active armor.

[uav80]

On wheeled armored personnel carriers - Hmm, why was it possible or what .. ??

[Professor]

Quote: Canecat

Hmm ... and protection in the form of active armor is not provided?

And passive armor above 7.62 caliber does not hold. If the armor is strengthened to the extent that the chassis and transmission will not pull that much mass.

[loki565]

This one has reinforced armor, holds 12,7 mm Although active armor is certainly too much, if only the lattice screens are hung.

[Professor]

Quote: loki565

This one has reinforced armor, holds 12,7 mm Although active armor is certainly too much, if only the lattice screens are hung.

Doesn't keep guaranteed. Bourgeois 12.7 mm at a distance of 900 m penetrates 22 mm of rolled homogeneous armor along the normal. Here, although there is an angle of inclination, the armor is no thicker than 22 mm and the firing distance can be less than 900 meters.
https://www.nammo.com/product/our-products/ammunition/small-caliber-ammunition/12-7mm-50-cal-series/12-7-mm-x-99-ap-s-50-cal/

[loki565]

Doesn't keep guaranteed. Bourgeois 12.7 mm at a distance of 900 m penetrates 22 mm of rolled homogeneous armor along the normal. Here, although there is an angle of inclination, the armor is no thicker than 22 mm and the firing distance can be less than 900 meters.
https://www.nammo.com/product/our-products/ammunition/small-caliber-ammunition/12-7mm-50-cal-series/12-7-mm-x-99-ap-s-50-cal/

Have you checked? no, there were cases of beating 12.7mm? not. And you can write anything you want especially in such "independent" and "unbiased" sources)))

[Professor]

Quote: loki565

Doesn't keep guaranteed. Bourgeois 12.7 mm at a distance of 900 m penetrates 22 mm of rolled homogeneous armor along the normal. Here, although there is an angle of inclination, the armor is no thicker than 22 mm and the firing distance can be less than 900 meters.
https://www.nammo.com/product/our-products/ammunition/small-caliber-ammunition/12-7mm-50-cal-series/12-7-mm-x-99-ap-s-50-cal/

Have you checked? no, there were cases of beating 12.7mm? not. And you can write anything you want especially in such "independent" and "unbiased" sources)))

Have you checked what it holds?
See for yourself the booking

Now look at the performance characteristics of the 12.7 mm armor-piercing one.

[loki565]

Professor, you ask your interlocutors facts and evidence, and you yourself pour water as usual))) You have a video, a photo, and so on. penetration 12.7mm KamAZ-43269? Well, no means no)))

[Professor]

Quote: loki565

Professor, you ask your interlocutors facts and evidence, and you yourself pour water as usual))) You have a video, a photo, and so on. penetration 12.7mm KamAZ-43269? Well, no means no)))

I do not have a photo of the penetration of this armor with the main ship's caliber. So this papelace can withstand such a shot? You do not have a photo of not breaking through this armor from trauma. So this papelac can't stand such a shot?
In fact, the thickness of the armor in the photo is lower than the armor penetration of a 12.7 mm bourgeois bullet. It's elementary.

[loki565]

I do not have a photo of the penetration of this armor with the main ship's caliber. So this papelace can withstand such a shot? You do not have a photo of not breaking through this armor from trauma. So this papelac can't stand such a shot?
In fact, the thickness of the armor in the photo is lower than the armor penetration of a 12.7 mm bourgeois bullet. It's elementary.

I don't have to prove anything to you, you said that it would break through and provide the facts and do not pour water))) Did you measure the thickness of the armor with a ruler, or are you making a diagnosis from the photo? water water again water)))

[Professor]

Quote: loki565

I do not have a photo of the penetration of this armor with the main ship's caliber. So this papelace can withstand such a shot? You do not have a photo of not breaking through this armor from trauma. So this papelac can't stand such a shot?
In fact, the thickness of the armor in the photo is lower than the armor penetration of a 12.7 mm bourgeois bullet. It's elementary.

I don't have to prove anything to you, you said that it would break through and provide the facts and do not pour water))) Did you measure the thickness of the armor with a ruler, or are you making a diagnosis from the photo? water water again water)))

With a ruler.

[loki565]

With ruler

Well, the flag is in your hands, a drum on your neck)))

[Professor]

Quote: loki565

With ruler

Well, the flag is in your hands, a drum on your neck)))

Thank you anyway.

PS
For the rest: the photo above clearly shows the thickness of the armor.

[Sergei N 58912062]

Quote: professor

Quote: loki565

Professor, you ask your interlocutors facts and evidence, and you yourself pour water as usual))) You have a video, a photo, and so on. penetration 12.7mm KamAZ-43269? Well, no means no)))

I do not have a photo of the penetration of this armor with the main ship's caliber. So this papelace can withstand such a shot? You do not have a photo of not breaking through this armor from trauma. So this papelac can't stand such a shot?
In fact, the thickness of the armor in the photo is lower than the armor penetration of a 12.7 mm bourgeois bullet. It's elementary.

[Servisinzhener]

Are you talking about KAZ or dynamic protection?

[Konstantin Gogolev]

Thing! In such a car you can meet Post-Apocalypse. With a gas station in the rear.

[Glory1974]

Outwardly, it resembles the good old BRDM.

[Bashkirkhan]

KamAZ-43269 "Shot" in the area of ​​the Syrian Deir ez-Zor, onboard 55. This type is actively used by PMCs.

A soldier of a Russian PMC on a KAMAZ-43269 "Shot" armored car in Syria.

[markant1970]

BTR-40 "modernized" reminds

[Tektor]

Yes, this is a real combat rogue all-terrain vehicle. Respect to the creators.

[Sergey Aleksandrovich]

An all-terrain vehicle is when there are 8 wheels, not 4, or when there are tracks. This is a deserted (for deserts) simplified pepelats.

[Constanty]

This is how I look and I think the BTR-40 was way ahead of its time. Nice car and something like that

[2 Level Advisor]

"The armament of this module consists of a 2 mm 42A30 automatic cannon and 12,7 mm Kord machine guns and a 7,62 mm PKTM."

People, I just do not understand, who will enlighten, why 3 calibers to this unit? What's the trick?

[Sergey Aleksandrovich]

I can only make assumptions.
30 mm 2A42 is when a worthy target appeared on the horizon, like the M2 "Bradley" and a sub-caliber projectile was reserved for it,
12,7 "Kord" is when a worthy target appeared, but they did not have time to get up in front of it, and the recoil from 2A42 could turn the pepelats over.
7,62 PKTM is when an unworthy target appeared, or when shells on other calibers have already run out.

[2 Level Advisor]

but .. in the return is a trick .. then it is clear .. did not know that it was so strong .. thanks

[Sergey Aleksandrovich]

As for it will turn it over, I certainly exaggerated it, but the swing will be strong.

[Servisinzhener]

Hopefully it has a filtration and air conditioning system.

[Sergei N 58912062]

Quote: Servisinzhener

Hopefully it has a filtration and air conditioning system.

Yes, there is.

[Thorvlobnor IV]

The view from the driver's seat forward with such a huge beak is awful! Or is there a "front view" video camera? And how to pull out a wounded in full gear through this "door", on occasion?

[Sergei N 58912062]

Quote: Torvlobnor IV

The view from the driver's seat forward with such a huge beak is awful! Or is there a "front view" video camera? And how to pull out a wounded in full gear through this "door", on occasion?

A normal view and the wounded through this door can be pulled out.

[Protos]

BTR-82A lite

[Protos]

Quote: Torvlobnor IV

The view from the driver's seat forward with such a huge beak is awful! Or is there a "front view" video camera? And how to pull out a wounded in full gear through this "door", on occasion?

The visibility is normal, such as on all bonneted trucks.
There is a back door for "pulling out the wounded in full gear"

[Protos]

Quote: Zaurbek

..... and shone in Donbass

Another ukrmif

[Sergei N 58912062]

Quote: Protos

Quote: Zaurbek

..... and shone in Donbass

Another ukrmif

They really shone in the Donbass.

[Sancho_SP]

30, 12,7 and 7,62 are overkill.

With a 30 mm cannon, the 12,7 machine gun is no longer needed. Better to add 30 mm shells to its mass. Easy tasks will close 7,62.

[Sergei N 58912062]

Or another combat module. For example, MB2-04 with AGS or MB2-05 with ATGMs.

[Sergei N 58912062]

The photo that appeared on the Internet shows the Shot armored vehicle, presumably equipped with the MB2-04 combat module.

This is it, the combat module MB2-04 from Muromteplovoz.