Ukrainian military expert "revealed" Russia's plans for three closed areas of the Black Sea

In Ukraine, the plans of the Russian Ministry of Defense for three closed areas of the Black Sea were revealed. According to the Ukrainian military expert, reserve colonel Oleg Zhdanov, it is in these areas that there is the greatest threat of a Ukrainian landing.

Russia is preparing to defend the "annexed" Crimea, and has closed three regions of the Black Sea along the Crimean coast, since there is the greatest threat of a Ukrainian landing. In favor of his version, Zhdanov cited the timing of the closure of these areas, announced by the Russian Ministry of Defense. The "expert" stressed that by the end of October 2021, the Russian military hopes to strengthen the coast of Crimea.

The overlap of these areas is most likely due to the fact that along the Crimean coast Russia sees the greatest threat and the likelihood of an amphibious landing from the Ukrainian side and therefore tries to secure them as much as possible. That is, the overlap has purely military purposes.

- he added.

According to Zhdanov, the stronger the defense of Crimea, the more difficult it will be for Ukraine to return it. Strong logic, there is nothing to say. Judging by the statements of the expert, Kiev will "liberate" the peninsula by force. But, unfortunately, it is still unknown when to wait for the Ukrainian landing, the expert did not say anything. But they may not be in time, Russia will strengthen the coast, and that's it ...

Recall that since April 24, the Ministry of Defense has closed three areas of the Black Sea near the Crimean coast to foreign warships and vessels. All sites are located in the territorial waters of Russia and do not go beyond them. The approaches to the Kerch Strait and the strait itself have not been closed and will not be closed.

Comments

[mojohed2012]

That ni! Are you sho? The overlap is only necessary for you to write and talk about it, while the West has something to blame for "free navigation."
What's your business? Where we want and what we want - we cover it!
If we want, we will introduce a no-fly zone or "death zone" around the Kuevo, but we want - around Washington.
I remember Zhirinovsky, visiting Saddam, shouted about how our scientists will slightly change the axis of the earth (and at night!) And the whole Asashay will be under water! Like this!

[Ross xnumx]

According to Zhdanov, the stronger the defense of Crimea will be, the more difficult it will be for Ukraine to return it.

To return? It's worse than putting the toothpaste back in the tube ... I won't remind you of one river, it's difficult there ... Almost the same as returning all these "vyser" back ...

[mojohed2012]

Yes, we need to return Kharkov, Nikolaev, Odessa and Tiraspol through them to their "home harbor", that's enough! They sat down in nezalezhnost.

[Victorio]

Quote: mojohed2012

Yes, we need to return Kharkov, Nikolaev, Odessa and Tiraspol through them to their "home harbor", that's enough! They sat down in nezalezhnost.

===
there soon to return there will be no one, the locals are actively reformatting.

[Blacksmith 55]

Yes, if Ukraine decides to use force to "liberate" Crimea, it will be the end of Ukraine itself.
Russia will have grounds to defend its territory from aggression. It is only necessary to warn the NATO countries that any intervention in the conflict is unacceptable, or, as they say now, not to cross the red line.

[Orange bigg]

. Russia will have grounds to defend its territory from aggression.

Does anyone really need these grounds? Someone in the modern world pays attention to them? What are the grounds for sanctions against us? None. So maybe it's time for us to score on the grounds? It is quite possible and without any reason to defend the same Donbass. Stop making excuses to someone. If there are Russian passports in the DPR and LPR, then for a long time there are grounds for protecting the population with these passports. Or at least allow them to respond to shelling by the Ukrainian Armed Forces. I don’t understand our policy in Donbass since 2014. We want to cajole the Armed Forces of Ukraine, or by showing that otvetki will not provoke the Armed Forces to attack? Why are we openly playing up to the Armed Forces, supplying them with fuel and lubricants, giving them time to prepare?

You just need to warn the NATO countries

Maybe we should have warned NATO about the events in Crimea in March 2014?

[Blacksmith 55]

You cannot reason like that.
A state that starts a war is called an aggressor. And according to UN rules, any state has the right to defend its territory.
And the fact that Russia is always guilty of something, everyone knows about it. Like Krylov: And you are to blame for wanting me to eat.

[Orange bigg]

You cannot reason like that.

Yes? How can you argue? Enlighten us. Only mind you not according to the Washington training manual.

A state that starts a war is called an aggressor. And according to UN rules, any state has the right to defend its territory.

First of all, is the UN still alive? In my opinion, the organization showed its complete failure against the background of the same Syrian, Yemeni, Libyan, Donbass crises. The organization was often paralyzed by the confrontation between the countries that make up the UN.
The states of the DPR and LPR (albeit not recognized by someone) have every right to protect their territory and people from the aggression of the state of Ukraine. The state of Ukraine, which starts a war, is called an aggressor.

[Blacksmith 55]

The Ukraine-Donbass conflict can be attributed to a civil war. It depends on what angle you look at, that is, from which bell tower.
And the UN still exists, although almost no one follows the rules.

[Orange bigg]

The Ukraine-Donbass conflict can be attributed to a civil war.

After all, there are only fools around who do not understand anything or are far from being fools because realistically realizing what kind of conflict they are, they close their eyes to it and act strictly only in their own interests, as befits normal countries. Then why this mythology about the civil war? For a long time it was necessary to follow the Crimean scenario. Or do you want the Donbass to burn endlessly until it really turns into a lifeless desert? You don’t feel sorry for people? This is the way to nowhere. And a wedge is knocked out like a wedge.

... And the UN still exists

So far, yes, but apparently it will not exist as long as we would like due to complete discrediting and inefficiency.

[bayard]

Quote: Blacksmith 55

The Ukraine-Donbass conflict can be attributed to the civil war

The fact is that Ukraine has not demarcated its borders.
At all !
And the UN simply does not know where this strange state is located geographically.
At the same time, Russia is the heir to the USSR and takes its place in the UN.
Moreover, at one time Yeltsin asked the UN to call the USSR simply Russia.
So, according to the law of succession and in view of the uncertainty of the borders of the "state", Ukraine, the entire territory of the Ukrainian SSR, which is part of the USSR (and this is very clearly spelled out in the UN), falls under the full jurisdiction of Russia (aka the USSR), according to the UN registration.
And if in the Russian jurisdiction a certain group of people started a war / civil conflict, then who else, if not Russia itself, is to restore order on its territory?
This is what International Law says, and the UN is its witness.

Quote: Blacksmith 55

And the UN still exists, although almost no one follows the rules.

These are the pies.
And all according to the recipe of International Legislation.
You just have to be able and DARE to use your rights.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Blacksmith 55

A state that starts a war is called an aggressor. And according to UN rules, any state has the right to defend its territory.

Are you talking about Yugoslavia 1991-1995 now? I have not heard that the United States has attached the label of the aggressor ...

[Orange bigg]

Quote: ROSS 42

Quote: Blacksmith 55

A state that starts a war is called an aggressor. And according to UN rules, any state has the right to defend its territory.

Are you talking about Yugoslavia 1991-1995 now? I have not heard that the United States has attached the label of the aggressor ...

Because those who mold the stigma of the aggressor on an industrial scale (CNN, BBC and others like them) are directly funded by the West and defend its interests, so you will never hear this, even if the United States sweeps half the world into the trash.

[Blacksmith 55]

The United States was not alone in the war against Yugoslavia. And in my opinion, ALL these states were aggressors. There was a civil war in Yugoslavia, I don’t want to talk about the reasons for its occurrence.

[Aleksandr21]

Quote: OrangeBigg

If there are Russian passports in the DPR and LPR, then for a long time there are grounds for protecting the population with these passports. Or at least allow them to respond to the shelling of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. I don’t understand our policy in Donbass since 2014.

Not only you ... and apparently, the Kremlin does not need Donbass, i.e. if they wanted to change something, they would have taken some steps long ago, for example, they would have frozen negotiations in the Minsk format, until Ukraine fully fulfilled its obligations ... if the shelling of the LPNR would have begun, it would have brought the equipment to the borders ( as it was recently) and would give the LDPR forces the right to respond, harshly to provocations, and the APU would go on the offensive, then they would bring in troops and leave this vicious circle ... but the fear of sanctions from the West and external pressure hinders the implementation of such a step and ours, they arrange endless negotiations that lead nowhere ... so after all, you can drag it out for another 5-10 years, but only, the population will not remain there, as well as the infrastructure, only land will remain ... which is Ukraine itself and achieves.

[Orange bigg]

. judging by everything, the Kremlin does not need Donbass

I disagree. I would not have needed it a long time ago.

... but the fear of sanctions from the West and external pressure hinders the implementation of such a step and ours arrange endless negotiations that lead nowhere ...

Western sanctions are largely ostentatious. Maybe they just prepare the country for something, gaining time as an option. It seems that there is a question much broader than the question of Donbass. Donbass is important in the information war and does not allow NATO to approach our borders. Ukraine as an example of a catastrophe caused by cooperation with the West.

... So after all, you can drag it out for another 5-10 years, that's just, the population will not remain there, as well as the infrastructure, only the land will remain ... which is exactly what Ukraine is trying to achieve.

Do you think there will be a lot of population in Ukraine in 5-10 years? There are already 35 million Ukrainians, and 30 years ago there were almost 2 times more.

[fruc]

mojohed2012
Yes, we must return Kharkov, Nikolaev .......

No, let them come back themselves if they want.
And regarding the statement of the ukrovoenexpert, "former" in reserve Oleg Zhdanov, that it is in these areas that there is the greatest threat of a Ukrainian landing, let them declare what they want and, so long as they do not get worse after these statements. This is all for the potheads.

[Orange bigg]

Quote: ROSS 42

According to Zhdanov, the stronger the defense of Crimea will be, the more difficult it will be for Ukraine to return it.

To return? It's worse than putting the toothpaste back in the tube ... I won't remind you of one river, it's difficult there ... Almost the same as returning all these "vyser" back ...

By its mild reaction to the actions of Ukraine, Russia actually provokes the first to take radical actions. The points of fire must be suppressed, the shelling must be answered, then it will not be surprising for someone to dream of Crimea. And seeing a reaction such as if there was no war, the Ukrainians themselves would unleash a war not only in the Donbass, in the Crimea, but I would not be surprised if in other territories of Russia. When the flame flares up, it must immediately be extinguished, responding harshly to any provocations, and not waiting for it to flare up to heaven. We must immediately make it clear that those who start this will not succeed, but, we all suffer from some kind of garbage, all the time we want to be good for someone, although everyone around us is just pouring slop on us, imposing sanctions without the slightest reason ... Some kind of surrealism.

[knn54]

-Ukrainian military expert, reserve colonel
Too bad there are no stock experts.

[Proxima]

Quote: ROSS 42

According to Zhdanov, the stronger the defense of Crimea will be, the more difficult it will be for Ukraine to return it.

Brilliant! Here it is "strategic" thinking! I am already beginning to be afraid of the new wave of Ukrainian experts! We would have this in the General Staff or in the State Defense Committee in the period of the Patriotic Veika - the war would have been won, at least in 42!

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

spring is over, but there is no aggravation of psychos

[Orange bigg]

Yes, it will not end by itself until they receive it as in 2014. This is all the price of the half-hearted solutions of 2014. A half-hearted solution is not a solution to a problem, but a wasting time.

[Irek]

You have nothing to do in the sea, you only pollute the water.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Russia is preparing to defend the "annexed" Crimea, and has closed three regions of the Black Sea along the Crimean coast, since there is the greatest threat of a Ukrainian landing.

And the Ukrainian troops will probably get to those areas on those same rubber boats. And on the oars, so as not to pretend to be the noise of outboard motors, if, of course, they still exist.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich

And the Ukrainian troops will probably get to those areas on those same rubber boats.

So the admiral-generals have already taken these boats home.

[Lech from Android.]

Ukrainian experts have no logic ... only show-off.
Either they are driving around the Kremlin on the Abrams, then the Kuban has already been taken, then the Crimean bridge has been destroyed with missiles ... dreamers.

[prior]

Request to the Ukrainian military leaders:
Select only the strong and healthy for the landing.
We need healthy prisoners, not sick people with chronic diseases.
There is a lot of work, a lot ... the guys from Central Asia cannot cope.

[Stepan S]

We need to build BAM, we have no time to feed and heal the frail and weak.

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

And women in the assault force is a must. And there is always work for them. And let them pick up on the busty, but get it on. )

[Fedor Sokolov]

The Ukrainian authorities do not have steel eggs for landing troops on the Crimean coast. And the attack on Crimea itself is pure suicide, and not only for the Ukrainian army, but also for the Ukrainian statehood as such. However, we must be prepared for anything.

[rocket757]

Ukrainian military expert "revealed" Russia's plans for three closed areas of the Black Sea

So you're coming out, the experts strive to outdo the English!
Everything, there is nothing to discuss here.

[New Year day]

Another "smart guy" drew! Maybe the delirium of these "figures" is not worth discussing?

[Metallurg_2]

Ukrainian military experts (and experts in general) are the younger brothers of British scientists.
Where are you going to land? From inflatable boats?

[Egoza]

Quote: Metallurg_2

Where are you going to land? From inflatable boats?

Aha! Now they are learning to steer the oars noiselessly. In order not to betray himself ahead of time. And then ka-a-ak jump out, ka-a-ak jump out ... screaming? "Where do they surrender here?" Here are the most "svidomye" obviously not going here

[Stepan S]

I can hardly believe that this colonel retained some sense of reality, and that he served in the army. Ukrainian landing in the Crimea ... of course you can imagine the same as those boats in the Kerch Strait near the Crimean bridge. The result will be the same.

[rotmistr60]

since there is the greatest threat of a Ukrainian landing

Are the landing ships and boats ready? Suicide volunteers recruited? We have enough "military experts" who do not understand anything either in weapons or in tactics, and even more so in strategy, but the Ukrainian (?) Land produces them in batches. Whatever "expert" is, then at least Napoleon with the makings of Nostradamus.

[carstorm 11]

In the clown) what landing? Where will he land from? From rafts and boats? What is provided? 3 planes that still fly?)))

[Alexander Betonkin]

But when to wait for the Ukrainian landing, unfortunately, is still unknown, the expert did not say anything.

It went from Poroshenko and still will not stop.

[tihonmarine]

Russia is preparing to defend the "annexed" Crimea, and has closed three regions of the Black Sea along the Crimean coast, since there is the greatest threat of a Ukrainian landing.

The idea is very interesting, but why are there so many "kamikazes" in Ukraine who are landing in the Crimea? We all remember that all these fighters left Sevastopol and Crimea without a single shot without resistance, and there were about 20 of them.

[amr]

Yazh as I understand the landing will be on inflatable boats? did I understand correctly?

Or, taking into account the regions, do the Cossacks themselves go around the peninsula in submarines like on submarines and land on the southern coast?

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

Not. The landing will be exclusively on fighting pigs.

[Cat]

Dear show, maybe that's enough already? I, too, do not mind neighing with our smaller brothers, but this is already sore. Moreover, a colleague A. Staver has already spoken about this colonel (https://topwar.ru/116939-pogovorim-polkovnik-mysli-o-nekotoryh-voennyh-ekspertah-ukrainy.html) and follow the creative urges of this character on the field of propaganda is not interesting.
Let's better talk about the Martian helicopter.

[Prisoner]

Well, you can't hide anything from these experts. Everyone exposes once or twice.

[Dmitry Vladimirovich]

Ukrainian military expert, reserve colonel Oleg Zhdanov

UK General Headquarters, plans to seize Crimea ...

Such experts - in the first wave of the landing!
On rooks or what?
Where will the watercraft pick up?

Where did the expert / colonel study if he is going to storm the Crimea with the Air Force and RKR not suppressed Bal, Bastion? Or is he hoping that they will start to build an "Atlantic rampart"?
So we do not have corporals in the general staffs.

[Viktor Sergeev]

They have there that not an "expert" is an employee of the 95th quarter.

[Orange bigg]

Freelance employee, of which there in Ukraine, 75% of the population voted for Ze.

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

Ukrainian esPerd got drunk on bacon, got drunk on moonshine, gave birth to a "smart thought"

[Fitter65]

... that Russia along the Crimean coast sees the greatest threat and the likelihood of a landing from the Ukrainian side ...

From Odessa to the Crimea on rubber boats and river armored boats ... What if someone from the fish inspectorate is on the coast at this time, or God forbid, from nature protection? .. Not only will they take away all vehicles, they will also roll in such fines, it will be easier just give half of the Ukraine ...

[Alexander Trifonov]

, khokhlyara guessed))).

[Vladimir61]

Land of unfulfilled dreams! It would be interesting to look at such an attempt to "land" and its consequences.

Obsessive daydreaming (English maladaptive daydreaming) is a psychological concept first proposed by Eli Somer to describe constant intense mental activity, mainly aimed at fantasizing and thinking over a variety of plots and worlds.

[opposite28]

A sober assessment of the objective-subjective reality in the disclosed plans and the ability to formulate a correct forecast of future events speaks of a balanced, systematic approach to the analysis of incoming information, a vivid confirmation of this by the opinion of the Ukrainian expert

[Vladislav_2]

Since 1991, Kuev has not digitized his borders and did not submit them to the UN! ... and if there are no borders, then there is no such state! So why does Kuya Kuev demand something from the Russian Federation !? This territory still belongs to the USSR and now the Russian Federation!

[Reserve buildbat]

The first question is: from what scows, "full of feces", can the skakuas be dropped off?
Question two: "Xperd" directly indicates that the skakuasiya is preparing to attack Russia? Is it just out of stupidity or he decided to play in Richard Sorge, to warn the "occupier"?

[Installer]

You can't piss yourself ... you won't grow up)))

[tolmachiev51]

Strategist !!! Forgot to ask you what to do at home !? the influence on the brains of the regional committee "friends" is felt.