Military Review

Kamala Harris influenced Biden's decision to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan

57

On Sunday April 25, US Vice President Kamala Harris confirmed to reporters that she was the last US administration official who remained in Joe Biden's office before the head of state made the decision to withdraw troops from Afghanistan. When asked by CNN about whether she could be called the person who influences the president in terms of decision-making, Harris replied that she was. It was to her that the American president listened before finally approving the withdrawal of troops.


At the same time, the US Vice President emphasized that Biden showed incredible courage by ordering the withdrawal procedure to begin and complete it by September 11, 2021. Of course, there is some symbolism in the date of the final withdrawal of the troops, chosen by Biden and Harris. Twenty years ago, on September 11, 2001, a series of terrorist attacks took place in the United States, after which the then American leadership decided to send US and NATO troops into Afghanistan.

Over the twenty years of its military presence in Afghanistan, the United States and its allies, let's face it, have failed to change anything. The militants still control a significant part of the territory of this country, in many of its regions the central government operates only during the day, and at night - its own rules and laws. Without American support, the regime in Kabul would hardly have lasted that long.

At the same time, for 20 years of war, the maintenance of the American army in Afghanistan cost the budget of the United States "a pretty penny." Over the years, however, Washington hesitated to withdraw its troops. Biden's predecessor, Donald Trump, announced the need to withdraw the American army from Syria and Afghanistan. But then Trump's words were criticized by his opponents.

Interestingly, Kamala Harris once voted against a Senate resolution condemning Trump for calling for the withdrawal of troops from Syria. That is, despite disagreements on other aspects of domestic and foreign policy, Harris supported the former president in terms of the withdrawal of troops. She also advocated a political settlement of the conflict in Afghanistan for a long time and consistently.

It is worth noting here that although the 78-year-old Biden is an experienced politician, the years take their toll. The president is highly dependent on his entourage, and Kamala Harris is second in importance in him. 56-year-old lawyer and political scientist Kamala Devi Harris, as her full name sounds like, became the first woman to serve as vice president of the United States. She is of mixed Asian-African American ancestry: her mother is Indian and her father is from Jamaica. Not surprisingly, Harris is perceived as a genuine leader by the American left and liberals, in contrast to the elderly Biden.

There is no doubt that those groups of American elites who stood behind Biden and the Democrats deliberately chose Harris. She is comparatively young, especially considering the age of Biden or Trump. In addition, several identities are embodied in it at once - a woman, an African American, an Asian. The idea of ​​withdrawing troops from Afghanistan, which was shared by Harris, is aimed at improving the image of the United States in the developing countries of Asia and Africa.


At the same time, the withdrawal of American troops will save budgetary funds, which can be used for other purposes in the future. And if Trump was not allowed to withdraw his troops at one time, now Biden and Harris will enter the American history as the politicians who ended the XNUMX-year war in Afghanistan. Only, of course, in Afghanistan itself, the armed confrontation between the official Kabul and the Taliban (the Taliban terrorist movement is prohibited in the Russian Federation) will not end. However, do the residents of the White House care about this? After all, the withdrawal of troops is a political and economic strategy aimed at solving rather the internal problems of the United States itself.

Finally, we should not forget that in light of the aggravation of the situation in Ukraine, the United States will try to complete or minimize its military presence in other regions, so as not to scatter the forces and means of its army.
Author:
Photos used:
Twitter / Official Account of the US Forces in Afghanistan
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. svp67
    svp67 April 26 2021 13: 24
    +11
    Over the twenty years of its military presence in Afghanistan, the United States and its allies, let's face it, have failed to change anything.
    Like this? A SHARP increase in drug traffic? And the appearance of ISIS on the territory of Afghanistan?
    1. Nasrat
      Nasrat April 26 2021 13: 35
      +8
      Quote: svp67
      Over the twenty years of its military presence in Afghanistan, the United States and its allies, let's face it, have failed to change anything.
      Like this? A SHARP increase in drug traffic? And the appearance of ISIS on the territory of Afghanistan?

      Twenty years old, Karl !!!! And nothing could be changed !!! And this despite the fact that no one opposed from outside !!!! There is something to compare the Afghans with, from here and good memories of Shuravi ...
      Here, we have a different mentality, no matter how our empire is called - we are kind ...
      1. Svarog
        Svarog April 26 2021 13: 44
        -4
        Quote: Nasr
        Here, we have a different mentality, no matter how our empire is called - we are kind ...

        The empire no longer exists and was "kind" in the USSR. And now we are no different from the rest of the capitalist world .. well, it can only be our more bestial capitalism .. and with respect to our own people.
        1. Nasrat
          Nasrat April 26 2021 13: 48
          +3
          Animal capitalism ...
          https://diana-mihailova.livejournal.com/6399533.html

          And the fact that there is no empire for a long time is a lie!
          1. Svarog
            Svarog April 26 2021 13: 58
            -6
            Quote: Nasr
            And the fact that there is no empire for a long time is a lie!

            What do you mean..what do you see signs of an empire in the modern Russian Federation? Which states are dependent on us, where do we conduct our policy?
            This is to help
            The empire is the state - the world. There can be only one more than him - the aggregate humanity, united into a world state. The empire, figuratively speaking, seeks to fill a part of the world, to become self-sufficient and independent. Usually an empire is made up of a union under one rule of several states - community-states and territorial states. Empires were great military powers
            .
    2. hrych
      hrych April 26 2021 13: 39
      +4
      Quote: svp67
      Like this? A SHARP increase in drug traffic? And the appearance of ISIS on the territory of Afghanistan?

      The main thing they have achieved is that the pipeline from Iran to the PRC, about which they agreed with the Taliban twenty years ago, did not happen.
      Kamala Harris is the second most important

      The vice president is the fifth paw, it matters only when the first person grunts. The real second person is the Secretary of State. Now Damn, which is lumpy. He is also the most senior member of the US cabinet. The vice-president does not have the right to sign decrees and orders, does not have a separate apparatus, but only the grandfather can advise when he sleeps wassatHer merits in the withdrawal issue are exaggerated, Biden hardly remembers her name. wassat Periodically asks, they say, who is this dark-skinned boy laughing
      1. figwam
        figwam April 26 2021 14: 47
        +2
        On Biden's decision to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan

        And where will they be taken out, really in the USA?
        1. hrych
          hrych April 26 2021 14: 48
          +1
          Scattered around the bases
        2. cat Rusich
          cat Rusich April 26 2021 19: 28
          +2
          Quote: figvam
          On Biden's decision to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan

          And where will they be taken out, really in the USA?
          In Washington, there will be a new base - "Fort White House" soldier
      2. cat Rusich
        cat Rusich April 26 2021 19: 25
        +2
        Quote: hrych
        The vice-president does not have the right to sign decrees and orders, does not have a separate apparatus, only the grandfather can advise when he sleeps wassatHer merits in the withdrawal issue are exaggerated, Biden hardly remembers her name. wassat Periodically asks, they say, who is this dark-skinned boy laughing
        On the contrary, it is Kamala Haris, before each meeting of D. Biden with "outsiders", reminds D. Biden that he is the president ...
        Influence on the "first person of the state" is not tied to a position - even a cleaning lady (cleanliness manager) in the White House can influence the "first person" ...
        Or will you assert that D. Psaki, appointed to the post of Secretary of State, will be "second after the president" and will actually "steer the USA" (she will steer - where Glonass will send ...)
        smile
        1. hrych
          hrych April 26 2021 19: 35
          +3
          I'm afraid that those who really control Biden, who make the decision, this tanned girl of advanced age is simply not allowed to the body before making a decision. And Kamala herself is allowed to open her mouth on command. wassat
    3. Mitroha
      Mitroha April 26 2021 14: 03
      +1
      US Vice President stressed Biden showed incredible courage in ordering the withdrawal procedure to begin

      Yeah, he pushed for a long time trying to remember who is in front of him, what is Afghanistan and who he is. M-courage
      1. mojohed2012
        mojohed2012 April 26 2021 14: 23
        +1
        Biden? Kamala Harris? How strange it is! Biden himself calls Kamala "President Harris!"
        Blinken decided to withdraw his troops! what are Biden and Harris ... These 1,5 political invalids do not decide anything. One is trying to prolong the "age of survival", the second makes an important appearance and is promoted on flattering statements about the current affairs of BLM! And the exhaust is 0. The country is boiling, the lid is shaking ...
  2. Lt. Air Force stock
    Lt. Air Force stock April 26 2021 13: 25
    +3
    Once again, the Democrats want to play the woman president's card. It didn't work out with Clinton, they want to nominate Harris.
    1. frruc
      frruc April 26 2021 13: 56
      0
      ... the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan was influenced by Kamala Harris

      K. Harris made a decision, but the talking head announced? fool
    2. loki565
      loki565 April 26 2021 14: 12
      +1
      Once again, the Democrats want to play the woman president's card. It didn't work out with Clinton, they want to nominate Harris.

      Oh, coincidentally: an Asian-African American woman, if she is also "the correct sexual orientation", then the white grandfather can be dismissed)))
    3. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 April 26 2021 15: 32
      +1
      With Harris, it’s somehow easier, my husband didn’t get caught in adultery. And imagine Clinton in the oval office, at the famous canopy table. She would look for Monica under him every five minutes and would not find.
  3. nnm
    nnm April 26 2021 13: 27
    +6
    influenced by Kamala Harris

    - woke him up and showed him where to put the signature?
    As in the joke:
    "Everyone up to and including the senior lieutenant must be able to work independently. The captain must be able to organize work. The major must know where what is being done. The lieutenant colonel must be able to report what is being done where. The colonel must be able to independently find the place in the papers where he is supposed to sign. The general must be able to independently sign where he is directed. "
    - and Biden, apparently, is already a marshal and he needs help even to sign. Here Harris hurries to the rescue with the thoughts described by the Russian classic - "when will the devil take you?" and dream of sitting in his chair.

    Recently I learned for myself that the Americans massively call him "Sleepy (sleeping) Joe".
    1. Lionnvrsk
      Lionnvrsk April 26 2021 13: 34
      +1
      Quote: nnm
      influenced by Kamala Harris


      Recently I learned for myself that the Americans massively call him "Sleepy Joe".

      Fuck. Yes, Trump called him that all the time, almost in every of his campaign speeches! And journalists constantly quoted this, especially ours. yes You yourself, for an hour, did not sleep all this time? laughing
      1. nnm
        nnm April 26 2021 13: 38
        +4
        I slept, even snored, for sure - the outcome of the US elections was so important to me. That is why he said that he noticed for himself that it was SIMPLE AMERICANS who began to widely use this phrase. For not everything that is said by opponents takes root in the people, namely when opinions converge.
        1. dauria
          dauria April 26 2021 14: 04
          +1
          For not everything that is said by opponents takes root in the people, namely when opinions converge.


          Interestingly, and what about our "got accustomed to the people"? wink
          Well, and the withdrawal of the Americans from Afgan - everyone will sigh. Especially Iran with China. The question is who will try to occupy a strategically important area next. Are the Chinese?
          1. Sergey Aleksandrovich
            Sergey Aleksandrovich April 26 2021 15: 18
            0
            The Chinese have serious relief problems there. At a low start, Iran in the direction of Herat, for two centuries, and Uzbekistan in the direction of Mazar-i-Sharif.
            1. dauria
              dauria April 26 2021 16: 39
              +1
              The Chinese have serious relief problems there.


              Well, they won't equal the mountains. I think it's Chinese after all. Not immediately, not in a hurry, in about five years .. They will rent a couple of airfields. The same Bagram with Kandahar. And enough to stake out a clearing. They somehow agreed with Pakistan.
              And what kind of a superpower then China, if not "noted" in Afghanistan. wink
              1. Sergey Aleksandrovich
                Sergey Aleksandrovich April 26 2021 17: 00
                0
                Nobody will allow them to go so far, and they themselves will not climb, the limit of their aspirations is the eastern part of Badakhshan.
  4. Blacksmith 55
    Blacksmith 55 April 26 2021 13: 29
    +2
    Maybe there is at least one sober soul in Washington.
    Although American policy as a whole is unlikely to change.
    1. nnm
      nnm April 26 2021 13: 43
      +3
      Rather, just money. Nothing more. It is not for nothing that this war is already about 1 trillion dollars. cost. And the situation requires the forces to be directed against China and Russia. Therefore, realizing that the military budget of even the United States is a "black hole", and dissatisfaction is brewing in society, they simply decided that it was better to redistribute flows, and not print even more green papers. Look, the size of the US army itself will not be reduced, which means that if it has lost somewhere, it will arrive somewhere. And in this case, I think it will "arrive" somewhere near the borders of Russia and China.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine April 26 2021 15: 18
        +1
        Quote: nnm
        Nothing more. It is not for nothing that this war is already about 1 trillion dollars. cost.

        If somewhere you saw Uncle Sam's ears sticking out, then fabulous money will emerge somewhere nearby.
        1. Sergey Aleksandrovich
          Sergey Aleksandrovich April 26 2021 17: 02
          0
          Money is not the main thing for them, they print it themselves.
  5. taiga2018
    taiga2018 April 26 2021 13: 40
    +2
    And how long will the pro-American government in Afghanistan last after September 11, 2021?
    1. Antagonist
      Antagonist April 26 2021 16: 57
      +8
      How long did Najibula's regime hold out without the USSR? About the same, only half as much.
  6. spirit
    spirit April 26 2021 13: 41
    +3
    I feel this old man Joe's Haris is tightly held in one place) she worked as a district and general prosecutor, obviously there is compromising material hi
  7. rocket757
    rocket757 April 26 2021 13: 47
    +2
    Kamala Harris influenced Biden's decision to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan
    Come on, the decision has matured and overripe even during the last administration ...
    1. antivirus
      antivirus April 26 2021 21: 20
      +1
      Measure seven times, cut once and ... throw it away without regret.
      if the indexes grow, the solution has passed the test of time.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 April 27 2021 06: 18
        +1
        It seems that the past administration sent ... but could not, did not give! Everything is possible now!
  8. Mitroha
    Mitroha April 26 2021 14: 11
    +2
    Quote: rocket757
    Kamala Harris influenced Biden's decision to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan
    Come on, the decision has matured and overripe even during the last administration ...

    Themselves are now doing what Trump was criticized for. P-policy
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 April 27 2021 06: 20
      0
      Then there was a period of inadmissibility, but now, the current administration is allowed EVERYTHING !!!
  9. Professor
    Professor April 26 2021 14: 37
    -1
    Over the twenty years of its military presence in Afghanistan, the United States and its allies, let's face it, have failed to change anything.

    What were the goals of introducing American troops into Afghanistan? Remove El Qaeda. The goal has been achieved.
    1. Kurare
      Kurare April 26 2021 15: 14
      +2
      Quote: Professor
      What were the goals of introducing American troops into Afghanistan? Remove El Qaeda. The goal has been achieved.

      No, not achieved. They entered under the slogan "fight against terrorism", to which the Taliban movement was also attributed.

      In general, "chickens are counted in the fall." Now, if (I don't even write when) they come out, then we'll see what we have achieved in 20 years.
      1. Professor
        Professor April 26 2021 16: 03
        +1
        Quote: Kurare
        No, not achieved. They entered under the slogan "fight against terrorism", to which the Taliban movement was also attributed.

        1. The goal to remove El Qaeda and bang Benya Ladin is completed.
        2. "Defeating terrorism" was not the goal.
        The Americans should have left Afgan long ago. By the way, now it will be your headache.

        Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
        El Qaeda cannot be removed because of her absence. The goal was to bring the territory to a primitive state, which, in general, was successful.

        Uh-huh. Afghan before their arrival (the Americans) was just Singapore ... wassat
        1. Kurare
          Kurare April 26 2021 16: 39
          0
          Quote: Professor
          2. "Defeating terrorism" was not the goal.

          Well, yes, "to promise does not mean to marry"! bully I won't even argue with you here. 20 years later, one might think that everyone has forgotten the scale with which the "fight against world terrorism" began.
          Quote: Professor
          By the way, now it will be your headache.

          No, it will not wink
          1. Professor
            Professor April 26 2021 18: 17
            0
            Quote: Kurare
            Well, yes, "to promise does not mean to marry"! I won't even argue with you here. 20 years later, one might think that everyone has forgotten the scale with which the "fight against world terrorism" began.

            Again. ABOUT VICTORY nobody stated. Check the archives. There was no purpose Win.

            Quote: Kurare
            No, it will not

            Solntseliky said that it would be.
            1. Kurare
              Kurare April 26 2021 22: 00
              +1
              Quote: Professor
              Nobody announced VICTORY.

              laughing Really, they made me laugh! Those. in your understanding to start a war without "declaring" to win it - this is the approach of the Americans! Thank you, I'm under the table ...

              You can be the devil's advocate as much as you want, but this will not wash away the shame of the military campaign in Afghanistan.
              1. Professor
                Professor April 27 2021 07: 01
                -1
                Quote: Kurare
                Really, they made me laugh! Those. in your understanding to start a war without "declaring" to win it - this is the approach of the Americans! Thank you, I'm under the table ...

                When you get out from under the table, look at the statements of the Americans. They did not intend to "defeat terrorism" in contrast to the Russian Federation, which "won" three times in Syria.
                1. Kurare
                  Kurare April 27 2021 09: 38
                  0
                  Quote: Professor
                  When you get out from under the table, look at the statements of the Americans. They did not intend to "defeat terrorism" in contrast to the Russian Federation, which "won" three times in Syria.

                  hi So yes, you drive me under the table with your comments all the time! Are you comparing the Syrian campaign to the Afghan one? I understand that you really want to whitewash the United States from this shame, but only the whitewash is not enough.

                  The goals of the Russian Federation in Syria were completely different. I'll make a reservation right away: I am an anti-fan of Assad, just like I was an anti-fan of Gaddafi. But, the example of Gaddafi showed what happens to the country when they come there with "democracy". The expression on the face of Clintons and her "WOW" as she watched the moment of Gaddafi's lynching on her mobile. Very impressed. And then, from a prosperous and perhaps not very "democratic" country, they turned it into a hotbed of terrorism and a transit point for the so-called. refugees to Europe.

                  Do not find, the difference between Syria and Afghanistan is simply colossal!
                  1. Professor
                    Professor April 27 2021 10: 46
                    -1
                    Quote: Kurare
                    So yes, you drive me under the table with your comments all the time! Are you comparing the Syrian campaign to the Afghan one? I understand that you really want to whitewash the United States from this shame, but only the whitewash is not enough.

                    Have you found the goals for the introduction of troops into Afghanistan voiced by the Americans? There is a word there "Victory"?

                    Quote: Kurare
                    The goals of the Russian Federation in Syria were completely different. I'll make a reservation right away: I am an anti-fan of Assad, just like I was an anti-fan of Gaddafi. But, the example of Gaddafi showed what happens to the country when they come there with "democracy". The expression on the face of Clintons and her "WOW" as she watched the moment of Gaddafi's lynching on her mobile. Very impressed. And then, from a prosperous and perhaps not very "democratic" country, they turned it into a hotbed of terrorism and a transit point for the so-called. refugees to Europe.

                    What goals was announced by the Russian Federation and why THREE TIMES did it?

                    Quote: Kurare
                    Do not find, the difference between Syria and Afghanistan is simply colossal!

                    It's not about the difference, but about the stated goals.
                    1. Kurare
                      Kurare April 27 2021 11: 30
                      0
                      Quote: Professor
                      Is there the word "Victory"?

                      I can only repeat myself: starting a war without a goal to win it is somehow delusional.
                      Quote: Professor
                      What goals was announced by the Russian Federation and why THREE TIMES did it?

                      Stop the spread of ISIS, stop the pseudo-democratization of Syria. Indirectly: return to the Mediterranean region.
                      Quote: Professor
                      It's not about the difference, but about the stated goals.

                      Do you want to find fault with every "letter" that was said? So I will tell you a secret - this is not the text of some kind of treaty, where every comma has a meaning.
                      I already wrote, "chickens are counted in the fall." That's when the United States and allies with a proudly raised nose and a poster behind their backs mission accomplished will leave Afghanistan, then we'll see how well they achieved their (invincible) goals.
                      1. Professor
                        Professor April 27 2021 12: 30
                        -1
                        Quote: Kurare
                        I can only repeat myself: starting a war without a goal to win it is somehow delusional.

                        It's crazy to start a war on terrorism in pursuit of a military victory over it. The Americans did not set a goal to win. The topic is closed.

                        Quote: Kurare
                        Stop the spread of ISIS, stop the pseudo-democratization of Syria. Indirectly: return to the Mediterranean region.

                        Sergei Shoigu recalls that the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin set the military task eliminate terrorist groups in Syriaand also not to allow the militants, natives of Russia, to return back. "It was necessary to protect the country from terrorist threats" at distant approaches. "
                        https://rg.ru/2020/09/30/shojgu-k-5-letiiu-operacii-v-sirii-kazhdaia-iz-vypushchennyh-raket-porazila-celi.html

                        Targets not met. There is no victory.

                        Quote: Kurare
                        Do you want to find fault with every "letter" that was said? So I will tell you a secret - this is not the text of some kind of treaty, where every comma has a meaning.

                        This is more than a contract. We are talking about the lives of hundreds of thousands of people.

                        Quote: Kurare
                        I already wrote, "chickens are counted in the fall." When the United States and its allies with a proudly raised nose and a mission accomplished poster behind their backs leave Afghanistan, then we'll see how well they have achieved their (invincible) goals.

                        What was the purpose of the mission?
                      2. Kurare
                        Kurare April 27 2021 14: 46
                        -1
                        Quote: Professor
                        Targets not met. There is no victory.

                        laughing Based on your own logic, since it was NOT said ANYWHERE that the goal is victory, then there was no such goal!
                        Quote: Professor
                        This is more than a contract.

                        You are probably a lawyer by profession or by vocation, since you cling to every letter. Your right. But life is not black and white, and most often it is written more between the lines.
                        Quote: Professor
                        What was the purpose of the mission?

                        This is a great question. Ask the Americans, they don't know themselves. Don't say it was Al Qaeda!
                      3. Professor
                        Professor April 27 2021 16: 18
                        -2
                        Quote: Kurare
                        Based on your own logic, since it was NOT said ANYWHERE that the goal is victory, then there was no such goal!

                        Based on my logic, you should achieve your goals. The United States achieved its goals, the Russian Federation did not. There is nothing to discuss.

                        Quote: Kurare
                        You are probably a lawyer by profession or by vocation, since you cling to every letter. Your right. But life is not black and white, and most often it is written more between the lines.

                        Not a lawyer, but life taught me to read the small letters at the end of the contract.

                        Quote: Kurare
                        This is a great question. Ask the Americans, they don't know themselves. Don't say it was Al Qaeda!

                        They know and have voiced it. The goal has been achieved. Home.
                        https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-111shrg55538/html/CHRG-111shrg55538.htm#:~:text=Preventing%20the%20return%20of%20the,very%20worthy%20of%20American%20effort.
  • tihonmarine
    tihonmarine April 26 2021 15: 20
    +1
    Quote: Professor
    What were the goals of introducing American troops into Afghanistan? Remove El Qaeda. The goal has been achieved.

    El Qaeda was removed, ISIS was created. They killed a hare, gave birth to a jackal. The goal has been achieved.
  • Sergey Aleksandrovich
    Sergey Aleksandrovich April 26 2021 15: 21
    0
    El Qaeda cannot be removed because of her absence. The goal was to bring the territory to a primitive state, which, in general, was successful.
  • tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 April 26 2021 15: 37
    0
    In addition to Iran, the Taliban may be added! There will be no enemy for the Taliban after the withdrawal of US troops, and they will replace the local government in a couple of months. And where will they go after that?
  • xorek
    xorek April 26 2021 16: 48
    0
    In my opinion, this is all PR chatter with the withdrawal from Afghanistan .. They will withdraw for 10 years ..
    The drugs keep them there, so they keep all the ISIS devils and recruit new ones ..
  • Antagonist
    Antagonist April 26 2021 16: 55
    +7
    When asked by CNN if she could be called a person who influences the president in terms of decision-making, Harris replied that she was.

    She only needs to confirm the information that Biden is the president, and she is the real president.
  • International Observer
    International Observer April 26 2021 17: 12
    -1
    Kamala Harris influenced Biden's decision to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan

    ... it doesn't matter at all now! It is the Western countries and the United States that gave rise to modern terrorism in the Muslim world! This creates a lot of problems on our continent! .. This is what should excite us, as a country that is a neighbor of many countries! ..
    Schools, kindergartens, residential buildings and power plants in Afghanistan were built only by the USSR!
    Therefore, the United States should now be concerned about only one circumstance - this is a fatal proximity to the ocean and "cataclysms" that can "suddenly" play out on its endless expanses right next to the American coast ...
    Everything else is simple, moronic pathos! ..
  • Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat April 26 2021 20: 23
    0
    Interestingly, Trump was thrilled for the withdrawal of troops - he was doused with mud for it. Either this mare or sherry proclaims the same thing and she is not made a halo.
    So what is "przer .. sorry president and vice president ... sorry, vice president? All the same inventory from the Obraztsov theater."
  • Alex Justice
    Alex Justice April 27 2021 08: 52
    -1
    Bad news.