Military Review

Lukashenko: I plan to sign a decree on the transfer of powers to the Security Council "in a special situation"

65
Lukashenko: I plan to sign a decree on the transfer of powers to the Security Council "in a special situation"

During his visit to the Polesie State Radiation-Ecological Reserve, the President of Belarus made a statement that attracted attention. Alexander Lukashenko announced that he plans to sign a special decree on the transfer of presidential powers.


According to Alexander Lukashenko, on the basis of such a decree, if necessary and in a special situation, power in the republic will be transferred to the Security Council. It is reported about the transfer of the presidential power.

Lukashenko called the planned decree "one of the most important decisions during his leadership of the country."

In communication with reporters, he gave a completely transparent hint of a variant of a special situation. According to him, "questions began to arise here, but what if the opponents of the president still succeed in the assassination attempt."

Lukashenko:

And if tomorrow it so happens that the president is not there. There will be no guarantee that everything will be fine either. Therefore, I will sign the decree in the coming days.

According to the President of the Republic of Belarus, it will be written there how the system of power in the republic will be built.

Lukashenko added that the Security Council will have the right to impose a state of emergency or martial law.



President of the Republic of Belarus:

There can be any situation here: even, for example, the president was shot, then he (the Security Council) will introduce martial law if someone moves at our borders.

Alexander Lukashenko added that he considers the likelihood of such a development of events to be low, but nevertheless, in his opinion, the decree is very necessary.

Lukashenko:

And you shouldn't reproach me for wanting to hand over to someone there, to hand over Belarus. I had the idea of ​​signing such a decree a long time ago. I am ready to do anything to save my country and yours.

Experts note that Lukashenka made a statement about the new document after his visit to Russia, where the question of an attempt on his life by agents of foreign special services was also raised.
Photos used:
website of the President of Belarus
65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. El Chuvachino
    El Chuvachino April 24 2021 15: 08
    +13
    Whose Security Council? If Russia, then yes, it is resonant. And if RB, then what's wrong with that?

    This whole story with a fundamental decision of decades is reminiscent of the statements made by Gordon with his super-duper discoveries to the whole world.
    1. figwam
      figwam April 24 2021 15: 11
      +4
      Quote: El Chuvachino
      Whose Security Council?

      Definitely Belarusian or it would not be a dad.
      1. KAV
        KAV April 24 2021 15: 24
        +16
        Normally. He sighed a million, but it turned out only to fart in the end. Such an unexpected decision was straightforward that all their mouths opened in surprise.
        1. Overlock
          Overlock April 24 2021 17: 07
          +20
          Quote: KAV
          Such an unexpected decision was straightforward that all their mouths opened in surprise.

          Were you hoping for a different result? On the 23rd, Matvienko planned to collect the Federation Council to approve the formation of the Union State. But Lukashenko slipped away again, although negotiations with Putin lasted 4 hours. As long as Luka is alive, there will be no Union State - it just needs to be understood
          1. Sergej1972
            Sergej1972 April 25 2021 14: 54
            +1
            So the decision to create the Union State was made in November 1999. Formally, it exists.
      2. hrych
        hrych April 24 2021 15: 33
        +4
        Quote: figvam
        it would not be dad

        Moscow expected loud statements from Batka, but it was calm (in the style of Putin), although the speech about very important details of the Union State was indicated. Do not shout about the creation of the Union State, that's how it was created. But important nuances were said for joint defense and unification of tax legislation. This speaks volumes. Together with the redirection of logistics from Ventspils and Klaipeda to Ust-Luga, an infrastructure designed for cross-border tourism has also been created along the eastern Polish border. Shuttles from the Kaliningrad region of the Russian Federation, Lithuania, Belarus and Ukraine annually left 2 billion zlotys in cashless and about a billion in cash in Polish stores and wholesalers. A quarter of the trade turnover came from Belarusians, who were banned from cheap shopping in Polish shopping centers. The Old Man's revenge is terrible.
        1. Brturin
          Brturin April 24 2021 16: 03
          +6
          Quote: hrych
          The Old Man's revenge is terrible.

          scary, not scary, but actions on the face ...
          Belarus has introduced a ban on the import and sale on its territory of goods of a number of companies from foreign countries that previously imposed sanctions against legal entities and individuals of the republic ... The list of prohibited goods includes products of the groups of companies Liqui Moly, Škoda Auto and Beiersdorf (owns, among other brands Nivea, Labello, Hansaplast, etc.). “In the event that prohibited goods are detected when imported into Belarus, such goods will be subject to re-export from the territory of the country. In case of identification of those prohibited in trade objects, in markets, exhibitions, fairs, in online stores and the global computer network of the Internet, persons engaged in such trade will be issued an order to prohibit their sale "
          https://iz.ru/1156076/2021-04-23/belorussiia-zapretila-vvoz-produktcii-skoda-i-nivea
          1. MstislavHrabr
            MstislavHrabr April 24 2021 16: 32
            +5
            “In the event that prohibited goods are detected when imported into Belarus, such goods will be subject to re-export from the territory of the country.” And it should be written; “Such goods will be subject to confiscation without compensation for damage,” and then everything else ...
            1. sidoroff
              sidoroff April 24 2021 21: 30
              +1
              and it is right . whoever confiscates what, he has it. another source of income for those who are especially close.
          2. Konstantin Gogolev
            Konstantin Gogolev April 24 2021 19: 32
            +3
            This is an insult for the postponed Ice Hockey World Championship. Refused sponsors.
            1. sidoroff
              sidoroff April 25 2021 11: 56
              +2
              and if Geyropa suddenly abandons oil products produced at Belarusian refineries, potash fertilizers .. and that
              will be with transit to Ust Luga?
              1. Konstantin Gogolev
                Konstantin Gogolev April 25 2021 12: 20
                +1
                This means that all parties will suffer serious financial losses. The key word is everything.
                1. sidoroff
                  sidoroff April 25 2021 14: 05
                  +2
                  everything . only some pearls will become a little less, and some will remain without cabbage soup at all.
                  1. Konstantin Gogolev
                    Konstantin Gogolev April 25 2021 15: 56
                    +2
                    They will sell to outbid a little cheaper (deal through third countries). The port of shipment will be registered in Ust Luga.
                    But this is very, very unlikely. Most likely, everything will remain after the fact.
        2. Overlock
          Overlock April 24 2021 17: 08
          +15
          Quote: hrych
          Moscow expected loud statements from Batka

          And they expected from Putin. But silence. The cart is still there.
          Quote: hrych
          Do not shout about the creation of the Union State, that's how it was created.

          When did you manage?
          1. hrych
            hrych April 24 2021 18: 58
            +7
            Quote: Overlock
            When did you manage?

            The agreement on the creation of the Union State of Russia and Belarus was signed on December 8, 1999 in Moscow. The treaty entered into force on January 26, 2000 after ratification by the parliaments of the two countries.
            At a meeting in Moscow, Alexander Lukashenko noted at the beginning of the talks that Belarus and Russia had made serious progress in the issue of coordinating union programs. “Remember, we started with maps (road maps). Very serious programs. Probably, we have already agreed on 26 or 27 programs at the government level. There is not much left, 2-3 very serious programs of an economic nature, including taxation, ”the President said.
            He also noted that in cooperation with Russia, it is necessary to strengthen issues related to security and defense of the Union State. “We’ll handle it. And we will draw lines that no one should cross, and we will adequately answer those who do not understand that in this frenzied world we need to be calmer and live in harmony, ”the Belarusian leader emphasized.
            In the summer, it is planned to hold a Forum of the Regions of Belarus and Russia, which will be hosted by the Moscow region. The parties will then determine exactly when in the fall, organize a meeting of the Supreme State Council of the Union State in order to formalize all agreements.
            Those. everything will be fine by autumn. It took 20 years to achieve this. Nothing, the less haste, the stronger the foundation. The main thing Daddy stopped slowing down ... under threat of liquidation laughing
    2. RealPilot
      RealPilot April 24 2021 17: 08
      +2
      Somehow weak for an unprecedented solution ...

      Well, not a prime minister, but a collegiate body. This is better in the Belarusian situation. But what difference does that make? For Lukashenka personally - yes, a lot (or rather everything) ...
      This violates the Constitution, since powers are distributed in it. And such changes must be made in accordance with the procedure, and not by decrees.
    3. TARS_117
      TARS_117 April 24 2021 18: 40
      +4
      Guess who is the chairman of the Security Council)))) And at the same time, who is the assistant to the president for national security ... So the replacement of the sewing machine for soap. In any case, one family will still rule the country))))
      And for a snack "
      Article 89 of the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus. If the office of the President is vacant or if it is impossible for him to fulfill his duties on the grounds provided for by the Constitution, his powers, prior to the taking of the Oath by the newly elected President, shall pass to the Prime Minister.
      When will the country remember the laws ???
      1. For example
        For example April 25 2021 07: 35
        -3
        Quote: TARS_117
        When will the country remember the laws ???

        As soon as you become part of the system, you will immediately say that the law is being respected!
        You will change your shoes on the fly. wink laughing
        You should not get a chair, but even a chair in the administration of the district settlement. wassat

        The authorities must be able to defend themselves.
        Including from those who are in eternal search for a law convenient for themselves.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. Anton S
    Anton S April 24 2021 15: 22
    +11
    Constitution of the Republic of Belarus
    Article 89. In the event of a vacancy in the office of the President or the impossibility of fulfilling his duties on the grounds provided for by the Constitution, his powers, prior to the taking of the Oath by the newly elected President, shall pass to the Prime Minister.
    Attention to the question: With what fright does this character cancel the effect of the Constitution, which is the Basic Law of the Republic of Belarus, which has the highest legal force, by his sole decree?
    1. AUL
      AUL April 24 2021 16: 22
      +2
      Is it difficult to change the Constitution to suit the president's wishes? If they can't cope themselves, they can borrow Tereshkova from us!
      1. Anton S
        Anton S April 24 2021 16: 36
        +2
        Quote: AUL
        Is it difficult to change the Constitution to suit the president's wishes? If they can't cope themselves, they can borrow Tereshkova from us!

        In Russia, at least they created the appearance of compliance with the procedure, but in the Republic of Belarus, the AHL decided that it could cope without the Tereshkovs.
        1. TARS_117
          TARS_117 April 24 2021 19: 16
          +1
          "Sometimes it's not up to the laws"
          a.y. lukashenka
    2. MstislavHrabr
      MstislavHrabr April 24 2021 16: 35
      -4
      The assassination of the president and the coup d'etat are not grounds provided for by the Constitution ... And therefore the decree is needed ...
      1. Anton S
        Anton S April 24 2021 16: 49
        +3
        Quote: MstislavHrabr
        The assassination of the president and the coup d'etat are not grounds provided for by the Constitution ... And therefore the decree is needed ...

        Read carefully the article of the Constitution - if the presidency is vacant, then the prime minister comes into play, and because of what it became vacant: volvulus, insanity, murder or suicide is the tenth thing. There is no need to invent anything new, everything has already been invented.
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 April 24 2021 17: 12
          +3
          Read carefully the article of the Constitution - if the presidency is vacant, then the prime minister comes into play, and because of what it became vacant: volvulus, insanity, murder or suicide is the tenth thing. There is no need to invent anything new, everything has already been invented.

          And what about in case both the President and the Prime Minister "fell ill"?
          IMHO, the Security Council is not a bad idea. It's hard to "lose" them all at once.
      2. Overlock
        Overlock April 24 2021 17: 11
        +14
        Quote: MstislavHrabr
        The assassination of the president and the coup d'etat are not grounds provided for by the Constitution.

        What about a heart attack or stroke, or an accident? What difference does it make why he dies?
        1. MstislavHrabr
          MstislavHrabr April 25 2021 02: 37
          -1
          The difference is external interference or internal reasons ... If the reasons are internal, then the prime minister will be enough to solve them, if external, then the Security Council, martial law and everything else ...
    3. Overlock
      Overlock April 24 2021 17: 09
      +14
      Quote: Anton S
      : With what fright does this character cancel the effect of the Constitution, which is the Basic Law of the Republic of Belarus, which has the highest legal force, by his sole decree?

      There is a desire and there are opportunities. "The State is Me" - as old as the world
    4. TARS_117
      TARS_117 April 24 2021 18: 45
      0
      And then someone else will say that he scored 80% ???
  4. Petrol cutter
    Petrol cutter April 24 2021 15: 24
    0
    And I am planning to buy a refrigerator. Belarusian production.
    So, what is next? It has been hinted to my father forty times that it is necessary either to enter the Russian Federation. Liberation for peace.
    And the comrade lives his own life and rejoices.
    He does not even attend all-Russian subbotniks.
  5. samarin1969
    samarin1969 April 24 2021 15: 34
    +5
    Well, the Comandante's record for assassination attempts is unlikely to break. And even though he grows a beard, he does not look like a proud Fidel: he constantly complains, requires a special attitude, cunning and dodges.
    1. Overlock
      Overlock April 24 2021 17: 13
      +11
      Quote: samarin1969
      Well, the Comandante's record for assassination attempts is unlikely to break

      Were they there? I doubt what you can't think of for the sake of your image
  6. Konstantin Gogolev
    Konstantin Gogolev April 24 2021 15: 40
    0
    As soon as he signed a decree on tightening currency controls, some questions about the "resonant" decision disappeared by themselves.
  7. Arlen
    Arlen April 24 2021 15: 43
    +8
    Something Lukashenka says nothing about the Union State ...
    Meanwhile, on April 2, in Minsk, organizations belonging to the Unity Coordination Council held a picket against the delay in the construction of the Union State of Belarus and Russia.
    The participants in the picketing adopted an appeal, in which the requirements were stated:
    1. In accordance with the Treaty of December 8, 1999, begin the full implementation of the union into a single Union State with a single current leadership.
    2. To unite the armed forces of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation into a single Armed Forces of the Union State of Belarus and Russia, subordinating them to a single command.

    Full information about the picketing and the adopted appeal can be found on the website of the All-Union Communist Party of the Bolsheviks at the link http://vkpb.ru/nasha-borba/913-piketirovanie-v-minske-protiv-zatyagivaniya-srokov-stroitelstva-soyuznogo-gosudarstva- belorussii-i-rossii.html
    1. alexmach
      alexmach April 24 2021 15: 53
      +8
      Something Lukashenka says nothing about the Union State ...

      I mean, does not speak? I said recently that there is no talk of any kind of unification.
      1. Arlen
        Arlen April 24 2021 17: 13
        +4
        Quote: alexmach
        I said recently that there is no talk of any kind of unification.

        Thanks for the info. Apparently I missed it from the news. There have been a lot of things to do for the past two months. hi
  8. A. Privalov
    A. Privalov April 24 2021 16: 03
    +1
    He will not give anything to anyone.
    Eight officials have been approved as permanent members of the Security Council: the Prime Minister, the Chairpersons of the Council of the Republic and the House of Representatives of the National Assembly, the Head of the Presidential Administration, the State Secretary of the Security Council, the Ministers of Internal Affairs, Defense, and the Chairman of the State Security Committee.

    The members of the Security Council are the chairmen of the Supreme Court, the State Control Committee, the Board of the National Bank, the Investigative Committee, the State Military-Industrial Committee, the State Border Committee, the Prosecutor General, the Ministers of Foreign Affairs, Finance, Emergency Situations, the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces - First Deputy Minister of Defense.

    By signing a decree on the transfer of powers to the Security Council, he will sign himself, if not a verdict, then a resignation, that's for sure. There will be no need for it anymore. The Security Council will perfectly cope with all matters itself. And if smart pragmatists also sit there, then the political consensus in the country will be quite easy to achieve. hi
    1. knn54
      knn54 April 24 2021 16: 37
      +3
      Alexander, a moot point. It is simply unrealistic that everyone would unite in unison (especially the police and the prosecutor's office, the police and the KGB, etc.) against Lukashenka.
      1. A. Privalov
        A. Privalov April 24 2021 16: 58
        -1
        Quote: knn54
        Alexander, a moot point. It is simply unrealistic that everyone would unite in unison (especially the police and the prosecutor's office, the police and the KGB, etc.) against Lukashenka.

        That you still do not know the history of coups and conspiracies. History and not such ties-strings seen. I just do not wish the people of Belarus, as well as Lukashenka himself, anything bad. This is not my business and I consider it unethical to interfere in this. As the Arabic saying goes: "Anyone who crawls into something that does not concern him, surely finds something that he does not like."

        Any revolution raises from the social bottom such rubbish, such marginal elimination, that it is time to shudder. Not a single social elevator, under any normal circumstances, delivers this upstairs. Not fit. Will break down with disgust.
        Moreover, the intensity of revolutionary events is directly proportional to the number of non-humans that fall from the rags into riches. And with the severity and duration of the consequences, the same proportion: the more they shake, the longer we smell, the more intense the stench.
        Any revolution is an evil with enormous and lasting consequences. For decades. Sometimes more. There is nothing in it but cheap bloody romance and many dead people. Those who died so that the most cunning, vile, unprincipled members of society could seize power.
        The whole world is still unraveling the revolutionary processes in the Russian Empire.
        Napoleon, not without irony, said that people are divided into those who make revolutions and those who enjoy their fruits. I would add, and their stupidity, but where am I to a man who was brought to power by cannons on the streets of Paris? He had the right to say so!
        hi
        1. dauria
          dauria April 25 2021 02: 49
          +2
          Any revolution raises from the social bottom such rubbish, such marginal elimination, that it is time to shudder.


          Brr. Already my teeth clenched from such a gummy-tearful nonsense. Can you tell me the author? And then, besides a certain Valetov from the Google Life magazine, it does not give out anything. The elevators are kind of socially squeamish. To the author's stable, whip the slave and sell it to the Turks. Look what you wanted, give a pure revolution. He wants slavery to be abolished, but in a legal way. Not some "marginalized", but enlightened highly cultured. laughing
          Where did you only find such a "sociologist" ...
    2. Anatole Klim
      Anatole Klim April 24 2021 17: 45
      +1
      Quote: A. Privalov
      By signing a decree on the transfer of powers to the Security Council, he will sign himself, if not a verdict, then a resignation, that's for sure. There will be no need for it anymore. The Security Council will perfectly cope with all matters itself.

      I have heard about the blue fingers clinging to the Belarusian presidential throne for at least five years, but the equilibrist resisted the large-scale protests after the elections, then the western impact with the help of the Polish-Baltic ram, huge Russian political and financial support for Lukashenka, an incomprehensible coup attempt in Belarus, and you all believe that he will give some powers to the Security Council, this is all a profanation, well, do not be naive. hi
      1. A. Privalov
        A. Privalov April 24 2021 18: 42
        0
        Quote: Anatol Klim
        You all believe that he will give some powers to the Security Council,

        You didn't read carefully. I quote the very first phrase of my post:
        "He will not give anything to anyone." hi
  9. Mouse
    Mouse April 24 2021 16: 20
    +2
    blowing on the water ??? recourse
    1. A. Privalov
      A. Privalov April 24 2021 20: 57
      -2
      Quote: Mouse
      blowing on the water ??? recourse

      Not. A real putsch was being prepared there. Anything could happen ...
  10. cniza
    cniza April 24 2021 16: 31
    +2
    Lukashenko called the planned decree "one of the most important decisions during his leadership of the country."


    When we honor, then we appreciate ...
  11. Semyonich from the Urals
    Semyonich from the Urals April 24 2021 16: 37
    -1
    How interesting..
    And if the president is slammed without this decree, then who will rule?
  12. Aviator_
    Aviator_ April 24 2021 19: 49
    0
    The obstinacy of some commentators about the creation of the so-called. "union state". In reality, if this happens, then all Belarusian enterprises will come under the control of Russian oligarchs, and the Minsk Tractor Plant will become the same as the Volgograd Tractor Plant. The list goes on.
    1. Roma 1977
      Roma 1977 April 25 2021 08: 23
      -1
      And if the enterprises of Belarus do not come under the control of Russian oligarchs, they will continue to work at a loss, covered by loans given to Lukashenka by the very same Russian oligarchs. The scheme is interesting, but no longer works: it turned out that it only leads to an increase in the national debt.
      1. Aviator_
        Aviator_ April 25 2021 10: 57
        +2
        Thinking like a banker. After all if the enterprises do not go under the control of Russian oligarchs, they will remain... During the transition, they will disappear, and everything will be the same as with composites for MS-21 - there are none of our own, and foreign ones will not sell. Money does not solve everything, you need real production. It is there, and banking capital wants to destroy it, talking about "non-repayable loans." Of course, if you need dollars, and not products, then you can reason like that. But how much can you do sitting on a pile of unsecured green pieces of paper?
        1. Roma 1977
          Roma 1977 April 25 2021 11: 49
          0
          Where to get money to cover losses? RB is actually a bankrupt country. It will not be possible to live in the old way, but in a new way - it is either to close the enterprises ourselves, exporting equipment for scrap, and areas for commercial development, or transferring control over these enterprises to Russian capital. Moreover, in the second case, Belarus will receive at least real money, and in the first - simply "free" de-industrialization "from below".
          1. Aviator_
            Aviator_ April 25 2021 15: 45
            +2
            Where to get money to cover losses?

            Losses to whom? Public or private sector? And there is a large bankrupt country overseas, whose national debt is huge. And nothing. And we need to change the owners, but from the very top it has repeatedly sounded that there will be no redistribution of property, that's not why they tried in 1991.
        2. Reptiloid
          Reptiloid April 25 2021 18: 05
          +1
          Good day, Sergey, hi I read that in Belarus it was possible to preserve the Soviet scientific and industrial base at state-owned enterprises. That the technologies that we have lost are supposedly preserved? Perhaps you know something about this specifically. At these enterprises and the social package in the Soviet style. Of course, this would not have been possible without relations with the Russian Federation. No hydrocarbons from the Russian Federation, no shrimp from Belarus ..... recently I bought a Belarusian herring caviar in a bank, yes "petrukha" ", my mother takes chicken pieces in boxes. Who would buy it from them? If not us.
          1. Aviator_
            Aviator_ April 25 2021 21: 36
            +1
            Hi Dmitry. Yes, they have retained a number of technologies that we have lost. However, over 30 years a generation has grown up that, looking at some successful entrepreneurs abroad (including ours), believes that they are greatly underpaid in today's Belarus. The same mood was among the intelligentsia in the late USSR, and the hard workers also differed in this direction, the same moronic Kuzbass miners, whose children have now turned into lumpen. And in the Republic of Belarus, the basis of the "protests" was made up of IT workers, at the general level they made good money, but they wanted to become oligarchs on Western prompts. Some of the oakiness of Luke's actions helped them in this. In the late USSR, propaganda was also oak, sometimes, however, good propaganda appeared, but for some reason it quickly faded away (the editors were probably changed). And now the opinion that if there is money, then everything will be - it has become prevailing. This is actually a moronic monetarist approach, but it is deeply rooted. It's good that the sanctions are brainwashing, you need to invest in your specific production, and not export them abroad (they wind up faster there) and not invest in speculation and financial pyramids.
            1. Reptiloid
              Reptiloid April 25 2021 22: 29
              +1
              In my childhood there was MMM advertising and discussion of pyramids. But modern young people do not know this, and many have been paid for the last few years, wanting to show their parents how to do it.
    2. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 April 25 2021 15: 10
      0
      Or maybe like KAMAZ, or VAZ, or UAZ, or GAZ, or, which is closer in profile, Rostselmash, which are quite working for themselves?
      1. Aviator_
        Aviator_ April 25 2021 15: 48
        +2
        And what about the Kurgan Machine-Building Plant, is it on your list? And the Vladimir tractor? Even Adolf Aloizovich argued that too many people live on our territory. This was later repeated by Maggie Thatcher.
        1. Reptiloid
          Reptiloid April 25 2021 18: 09
          +1
          Quote: Aviator_
          ..... Adolf Aloizovich also argued that too many people live on our territory. This was later repeated by Maggie Thatcher.
          I thought Chubais was the first to think of it. But it turns out not. That's what an informed person is ...
          1. Aviator_
            Aviator_ April 25 2021 21: 20
            +1
            This former bazaar florist cannot think of anything himself.
        2. Sergej1972
          Sergej1972 April 26 2021 06: 20
          0
          Thatcher did not say such words.
  13. Anton S
    Anton S April 24 2021 20: 05
    0
    Quote: TARS_117
    And then someone else will say that he scored 80% ???

    Totally agree with you.
  14. Anton S
    Anton S April 24 2021 20: 06
    0
    Quote: Overlock
    Quote: Anton S
    : With what fright does this character cancel the effect of the Constitution, which is the Basic Law of the Republic of Belarus, which has the highest legal force, by his sole decree?

    There is a desire and there are opportunities. "The State is Me" - as old as the world

    Unfortunately, this is so
  15. Old26
    Old26 April 24 2021 23: 06
    +1
    Quote: Anton S
    Constitution of the Republic of Belarus
    Article 89. In the event of a vacancy in the office of the President or the impossibility of fulfilling his duties on the grounds provided for by the Constitution, his powers, prior to the taking of the Oath by the newly elected President, shall pass to the Prime Minister.
    Attention to the question: With what fright does this character cancel the effect of the Constitution, which is the Basic Law of the Republic of Belarus, which has the highest legal force, by his sole decree?

    So the chairman of this Security Council is the prime minister. And a collegial body in the form of a Security Council is an addition ...
  16. xorek
    xorek April 25 2021 07: 45
    0
    Otherwise, you are signing Old Man, if you want to save Belarus .. They will drag it to pieces, if that .. This time the demons were drowned out, but there will be more powerful attempts.
  17. demo
    demo April 26 2021 13: 35
    0
    There can be any situation here: even, for example, the president was shot, then he (the Security Council) will introduce martial law if someone moves at our borders.
    I just want to watch this tragic comic thriller to the end.
    Where everyone is crying, but the Titanic is saved.

    Doesn't the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus provide for such a development of events?
    I think that everything is detailed there.
    Why is this twisted comrade "reinventing the wheel"?
    Here is itching to the same person.