Houthis claim to have stopped the Saudi advance in central Yemen

12
Houthis claim to have stopped the Saudi advance in central Yemen

There are reports coming from Saudi Arabia that the southern part of the country was attacked with strike drones. Reports say that the drones were fired from the border regions of Yemen by Houthi rebels.

The Saudi military command says it has intercepted two drones belonging to the Houthi group, which, it adds, are "supported by Iran."



We are talking about the so-called "kamikaze" drones. The first drone was aimed at one of the objects of the city of Khamis-Mushait, the other at Jizan.

The total number of drones fired across Saudi Arabia has not been officially reported. Accordingly, there is no data on how effective the actions of the Saudi air defense crews were. Based on unofficial data, there were three drones.

Information resources controlled by the Houthis write that the Ansar Allah units (as the Houthis themselves call themselves) were able to stop the advance of Saudi troops in the central part of Yemen. We are talking about territories that are rich in oil and for which the most active battles have been going on in recent weeks. At the same time, it should be noted that there is no united front in this area, since the Houthi units most often use the tactics of multiple strikes against the Saudi coalition troops from several directions. Therefore, the term "offensive" can be very conditional.

It can be assumed that the attempt to attack the cities of Saudi Arabia with the help of drones could become a diversionary maneuver to strike at Saudi troops in Yemen itself. The number of casualties among the coalition troops is not reported.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    12 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +2
      April 23 2021 08: 53
      The Saudis and KOs themselves are probably no longer happy that they got involved in a war. We thought to disperse the peasants with an easy march, but that's how it happened
      1. 0
        April 23 2021 08: 57
        Quote: Mitroha
        We thought to disperse the peasants with an easy march, but that's how it happened

        It's easy to get involved in a war, but to get out of it ...
      2. +1
        April 23 2021 09: 25
        Quote: Mitroha
        The Saudis and KOs themselves, probably, are no longer happy that they got involved in a war.

        In essence, the coalition is crumbling, practically the Saudis are fighting alone and paying the mercenaries, but they do not know how to get out, they cannot find an excuse. Negotiation proposal failed
        1. -1
          April 23 2021 09: 40
          The problem can be solved simply.
          The war is fought over one single man - the fugitive Preza, the protege of the Saudis.
          If he eats the fungi and glues the flippers, there will be nothing to fight for.
          1. +5
            April 23 2021 10: 00
            Quote: Pereira
            The war is fought over one single man - a runaway prez henchman of the Saudis.
            If he eats the fungi and glues the flippers, there will be nothing to fight for.

            He's just an excuse. There will be no such reason, they will find another one. the presence of a "ownerless" oil region motivates people to get their hands on it. In addition, the Saudis killed President Saleh back in December 2017. It's just that the Saudis hoped that their army was packed with modern weapons and the war with barefoot rebels would be an easy walk for them, but as it turned out, the presence of bells and whistles does not guarantee success. hi
            1. 0
              April 23 2021 11: 40
              Yes, I somehow missed this news. Well, then the war is for a long time.
    2. +2
      April 23 2021 08: 54
      A strange war ...
      The war of the mercenary occupiers with the local population ...
      And the ears of the mattresses stick out from behind the hillock ...
      And from the other side the Persians look out
      1. 0
        April 23 2021 10: 35
        Quote: Victor_B
        A strange war ...
        The war of the mercenary occupiers with the local population ...
        And the ears of the mattresses stick out from behind the hillock ...
        And from the other side the Persians look out

        Nothing strange, everything has long been defined and classified:
        Proxy war (English proxy war, also proxy war, war by proxy) is an international conflict between two countries that are trying to achieve their own goals through military operations taking place on the territory and using the resources of a third country, under the guise of resolving the internal conflict in this third country (the classic definition given by Karl Deutsch in 1964).
    3. +1
      April 23 2021 10: 39
      The Houthis have repeatedly proved that they can perfectly beat the Saudis armed with modern weapons. The Saudi spirit is weak against the determination and resilience of the Houthi.
      1. 0
        April 23 2021 11: 43
        There are almost no Saudis there. There are too few natural Saudis.
        Negroes are fighting for them. And what technique do not give, there will be no sense.
    4. 0
      April 24 2021 07: 30
      Saud bastards henchmen of the Amerz shaitan
    5. 0
      April 24 2021 16: 26
      Quote: Pereira
      There are almost no Saudis there. There are too few natural Saudis.
      Negroes are fighting for them. And what technique do not give, there will be no sense.

      There are no so few of them, almost 35 million people and besides them there is also the UAE - 10 million people. The Emirates will not be poorer than the Saudis, and they also have a huge amount of modern weapons.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"