The Ministry of Defense is introducing into the troops the concept of creating areas of "maximum protection"

37

The Ministry of Defense decided to create areas of maximum protection. The military will create special zones inaccessible to drones and high precision weapons the adversary.

The concept of creating "areas of protection" has already been adopted, according to "News"... Electronic warfare and air defense units will take part in their organization. In order to organize such areas that are completely inaccessible to drones, cruise missiles and precision weapons, the electronic warfare troops will hold a series of exercises during this year on the scale of military districts, and in the next - on a national scale. During the exercises, EW specialists, with the help of their complexes, will learn to place an "impenetrable" shield over certain objects or terrain.



It is assumed that getting into the coverage area of ​​such a shield, the enemy's attack means will be disoriented and shot down by air defense means. The military does not disclose all the details of the new concept, it is known that they plan to use it to protect both military and important civilian objects.

By the way, in April of this year, the first exercise of this kind was held in the 49th Combined Arms Army of the Southern Military District. There they worked out the use of the Pole-21 electronic warfare station in the reconnaissance and strike contours. Mobile complexes accompanied battalion tactical groups, creating over them a continuous jamming zone with a radius of 50 km, thereby preventing the drones of a conventional enemy from approaching.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    37 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +7
      April 21 2021 12: 24
      What so many tryndeli americana is about is coming true with the hands and minds of our military!
      1. +2
        April 21 2021 12: 31
        Actually, this is the task of air defense. I thought that there was not only protection from air means, but something to ... well, let's joke. to the gravity shield smile nearer. And I did not understand, apparently the meaning was not fully disclosed by the author.
      2. -2
        April 22 2021 20: 28
        Where does it come true? In your fantasies? Another thematic nonsense !!! Already got it with their nonsense!
        ... The military does not disclose all the details of the new concept,

        How can you reveal the details of something that doesn't exist?
        Just pay attention to this creativity of mentally retarded people!
        There they worked out the use of the Pole-21 electronic warfare station in the reconnaissance and strike contours.

        RUK and ROCK is a separate song of the General Staff of the VS, worthy of the repertoire of a polyclinic for the mentally ill !!!
        Those who have the patience can read:
        https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/formirovanie-sistemy-mezhvidovyh-razvedyvatelno-udarnyh-konturov/viewer
        1. -1
          April 23 2021 03: 41
          Quote: VO3A
          Where does it come true? In your fantasies? Another thematic nonsense !!! Already got it with their nonsense!
          What are the Americans tryingndeli indisputable for you?
          Quote: VO3A
          worthy of the repertoire of a polyclinic for the mentally ill
          You know who throws tantrums.
    2. +1
      April 21 2021 12: 27
      The Ministry of Defense is introducing into the troops the concept of creating areas of "maximum protection"
      ... Okay, you can create such a zone ... and then what will be left to protect the rest of the territory? The resources are not endless.
      All the same, the most reliable, proven concept is comprehensive protection, that is, defense systems and strike weapons !!! Those. "tanks on enemy airfields"!
      1. -2
        April 21 2021 12: 34
        Russophobic toad put you a minus! Warty ...
        1. -1
          April 21 2021 12: 39
          He wrote in a strange, neutral, objective way ...
          I have "admirers", but usually they are excited on specific topics ... but here so, nothing specific ... strange?
          1. +1
            April 21 2021 13: 33
            Quote: rocket757
            strange?

            VO has become the mouthpiece of Russophobia! Small shmakodyavisty chubato-globular dirty tricks! fool
        2. 0
          April 21 2021 13: 20
          Volodya hi and you are not alone ...
          1. +1
            April 21 2021 13: 37
            Quote: novel xnumx
            and you

            Roma hi There is only enough intelligence and courage to put a minus! Sharovarniki, damn it burnt!
            1. 0
              April 21 2021 18: 15
              Quote: Uncle Lee
              Quote: novel xnumx
              and you

              Roma hi There is only enough intelligence and courage to put a minus! Sharovarniki, damn it burnt!

              I also slapped you a minus for Russophobic toads - emotions can be expressed without insults, and rocket757 rightly said about tanks on airfields, plusanul. Not a Russophobe, if that. hi
              1. -1
                April 22 2021 01: 30
                And I didn’t put a minus on you - these are the people, they ate what ... hi
                1. +1
                  April 22 2021 16: 41
                  Quote: Uncle Lee
                  And I didn’t put a minus on you - these are the people, they ate what ... hi

                  Well, no, the "people" do not channel here, this is some kind of "preoccupied" personality, inspired by your "struggle" with a certain Russophobia on a Russian-language websitelaughing I think Russophobes, if any, sit on other sites. By definition, a Russian-speaking person cannot be a Russophobe.
                  1. +1
                    April 23 2021 01: 14
                    Quote: Doliva63
                    Russian speaking cannot be a Russophobe

                    How can they: Pale with a scythe, in pure Russian, called to burn Donetsk residents with atomic weapons!
                    1. 0
                      April 23 2021 17: 56
                      Quote: Uncle Lee
                      Quote: Doliva63
                      Russian speaking cannot be a Russophobe

                      How can they: Pale with a scythe, in pure Russian, called to burn Donetsk residents with atomic weapons!

                      She is sick, what to take from her? I'm talking about normal people, of whom, fortunately, the majority.
                      1. 0
                        April 26 2021 10: 29
                        Quote: Doliva63
                        She is sick

                        And how many such "patients" are there in Ukraine?
                        1. +1
                          April 26 2021 17: 16
                          Quote: Uncle Lee
                          Quote: Doliva63
                          She is sick

                          And how many such "patients" are there in Ukraine?

                          I do not know. All of my friends are normal.
                        2. +1
                          April 27 2021 02: 08
                          Quote: Doliva63
                          All are normal among my friends

                          It's good ! I'm happy for you ! hi
                        3. +1
                          April 27 2021 15: 54
                          Quote: Uncle Lee
                          Quote: Doliva63
                          All are normal among my friends

                          It's good ! I'm happy for you ! hi

                          Don’t make a mistake, I hope? Thank you hi
      2. +5
        April 21 2021 13: 07
        and then what is left to protect the rest of the territory?

        Marshal's shoulder straps but think like a civilian.
        Answer the questions.
        1. Who will attack the "rest of the territory" with precision weapons, that is, swamps, forests and steppes?
        2. How can these tanks be concentrated in order to crush airfields, if at first such a zone is not created in the place of concentration? But it may be necessary to concentrate where there is no echeloned air defense built in advance. In modern realities, you can't even place a MLRS battery in a position just like that without cover - it will be revealed and destroyed in the process of deployment. The article is about this.
        1. -1
          April 21 2021 13: 36
          Quote: bk316
          Marshal's shoulder straps but think like a civilian.

          So it is, for a long time already STAFF and I prefer to look at the problems from DIFFERENT AREAS. Question - What about us? - in society there is CONSTANTLY, which is quite logical, and even here it will be asked necessarily. And these are the citizens of our country, for whose protection our Armed Forces were created!
          Quote: bk316
          1. Who will attack the "rest of the territory" with precision weapons, that is, swamps, forests and steppes?
          But you will tell this to those who live in those territories. The country is big, people already think that capitals, big cities are somewhere out there, at the other end of the galaxy.
          Quote: bk316
          How can these tanks be concentrated to crush airfields,

          An instant, all destructive strike will not work, no one, for objective reasons ... as they wrote in our media, "war games, simulations" and showed ...
          Our "tanks" (this is a metaphor, of course), will deliver enough of what should, where it is needed!
          1. +2
            April 21 2021 14: 17
            But you will tell this to those who live in those territories.

            Yes, the tactics of using high-precision weapons of destruction of swamps and forests do not imply.
            NOBODY HEARS NOBODY will raise an F-22 to bomb a hamlet of 3 houses.
            And to cover something large and such zones are created, read carefully.
            protection of both military and important civilian objects.


            Think about whether you need to cover from ICBMs for example Ostashkov. Of course, 20000 of our citizens live there, you say. In general, it seems to me that such comments are either stupid or simply provocative. Why? Because no one will fire ICBMs at Ostashkov. And why then waste resources on protecting it from ICBMs?

            An instant, all-destroying blow will not work, no one, for objective reasons

            And this is not about that, I wrote not a single battery will be deployed, they will find it and beat it with a drone. Therefore, the troops must be covered, but you cannot cover every battery. So what? We need to use zone cover.
            1. -1
              April 21 2021 14: 33
              We are on a different wavelength ...
              1. +2
                April 21 2021 15: 34
                Well, yes, I appreciate the military-technical side, and you are socially ideological laughing
                1. -2
                  April 21 2021 15: 52
                  Well, so long ago I left military affairs ... so, sometimes the students stop by on a fishing trip, tell the news ... so the polygons are nearby, the most, the most, in all these matters.
                  But I communicate with people a lot and their interests are closer to me, I care more.
                  And since everyone knows where I served and what I did, they ask a LOT of questions!
      3. +1
        April 21 2021 13: 16
        read the last paragraph, there is just about it)
        1. -2
          April 21 2021 14: 11
          The military does not disclose all the details of the new concept, it is known that they plan to use it to protect both military and important civilian objects.
          The danger is that they can simply miss it, do not understand, and again it goes, it goes, like "the centers are protecting themselves, but what about us ???"
          After massive forest / steppe fires, we have a lot of questions to the upper and local authorities ... and calmed down, the majority, only when there were a lot more fire stations, brigades, fire fighting equipment !!! Those. people react, understand what they see !!!
          Explaining such concepts to the layman is difficult, if not impossible!
          and we do not live in a vacuum, people want to be sure that they will be protected too.
          1. 0
            April 21 2021 14: 15
            laughing Well, under this brand they can skip in any situation - the task is simple - to develop a comprehensive military / air defense system to close the area completely ... But what do people need to know? The list of funds involved or the procedure for working? so that it is convenient for NATO to work?
            1. -2
              April 21 2021 14: 32
              Do not consider the layman too stupid or too clever ... the layman is too trusting !!! And if he does not receive an ACCEPTABLE explanation from this side, then he will certainly be explained from the other side, but interpreting everything according to OWN !!! on the other side of the master there are interpreters !!! and channels of information, and all nonsense, do not block! I can point out / explain / slap the heels of such explanations, but ... I won't, otherwise they will write it down again as provocateurs.
              People want to live with confidence, to have well-founded hopes, they need to be supported, and not doubted.
              1. 0
                April 21 2021 18: 18
                but what difference does it make to the average man?
                1. -1
                  April 21 2021 19: 30
                  Really no ...
                  1. 0
                    April 22 2021 00: 10
                    in fact, the main thing is for the system to work
      4. -2
        April 22 2021 20: 08
        He wrote in a strange, neutral, objective way ...

        Did you rate yourself?
        All the same, the most reliable, proven concept is comprehensive protection, that is, defense systems and strike weapons !!! Those. "tanks on enemy airfields"!

        And here something is difficult to understand! And there is no concept here, only political slogans! Moreover, now all the proven concepts have run out, both in you and in the Ministry of Defense in the person of the author of the article. We have the concept of nuclear deterrence. Not only works, but also saves. Once again, I repeat, the rest of our concepts are in complete stupor ... and imply huge losses in their implementation. This is also about your work: "tanks on enemy airfields" and about another invention with "on the creation of areas of maximum protection" .
        Maybe for this you are molded cons ...
        1. 0
          April 22 2021 20: 59
          "tanks on enemy airfields", in quotation marks, as you should have noticed ...
          It's simple, a set of measures, any necessary impact on the enemy to prevent a massive attack on our territory. Anything you need, including fierce arguments.
          Everything is according to the concept.
          And at the expense of super closed areas, the mood is skeptical, for several reasons.
    3. -3
      April 21 2021 13: 22
      A couple of such areas already exist - Idokopas, Lunnaya Polyana ...
    4. 0
      April 22 2021 23: 31
      And I agree with them, the access zones for weapons must be reduced and removed.
      And it makes no difference how it will be done.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"