Military Review

The Ministry of Defense is introducing into the troops the concept of creating areas of "maximum protection"

38

The Ministry of Defense has decided to create areas of maximum protection. The military will create special zones inaccessible to drones and high-precision weapons the adversary.


The concept of creating "areas of protection" has already been adopted, according to "News"... Electronic warfare and air defense units will take part in their organization. In order to organize such areas that are completely inaccessible to drones, cruise missiles and precision weapons, the electronic warfare troops will hold a series of exercises during this year on the scale of military districts, and in the next - on a national scale. During the exercises, EW specialists, with the help of their complexes, will learn to place an "impenetrable" shield over certain objects or terrain.

It is assumed that getting into the coverage area of ​​such a shield, the enemy's attack means will be disoriented and shot down by air defense means. The military does not disclose all the details of the new concept, it is known that they plan to use it to protect both military and important civilian objects.

By the way, in April of this year, the first exercise of this kind was held in the 49th Combined Arms Army of the Southern Military District. There they worked out the use of the Pole-21 electronic warfare station in the reconnaissance and strike contours. Mobile complexes accompanied battalion tactical groups, creating over them a continuous jamming zone with a radius of 50 km, thereby preventing the drones of a conventional enemy from approaching.
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vladimir_2U
    Vladimir_2U April 21 2021 12: 24
    +7
    What so many tryndeli americana is about is coming true with the hands and minds of our military!
    1. NIKN
      NIKN April 21 2021 12: 31
      +2
      Actually, this is the task of air defense. I thought that there was not only protection from air means, but something to ... well, let's joke. to the gravity shield smile nearer. And I did not understand, apparently the meaning was not fully disclosed by the author.
    2. VO3A
      VO3A April 22 2021 20: 28
      -2
      Where does it come true? In your fantasies? Another thematic nonsense !!! Already got it with their nonsense!
      ... The military does not disclose all the details of the new concept,

      How can you reveal the details of something that doesn't exist?
      Just pay attention to this creativity of mentally retarded people!
      There they worked out the use of the Pole-21 electronic warfare station in the reconnaissance and strike contours.

      RUK and ROCK is a separate song of the General Staff of the VS, worthy of the repertoire of a polyclinic for the mentally ill !!!
      Those who have the patience can read:
      https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/formirovanie-sistemy-mezhvidovyh-razvedyvatelno-udarnyh-konturov/viewer
      1. Vladimir_2U
        Vladimir_2U April 23 2021 03: 41
        -1
        Quote: VO3A
        Where does it come true? In your fantasies? Another thematic nonsense !!! Already got it with their nonsense!
        What are the Americans tryingndeli indisputable for you?
        Quote: VO3A
        worthy of the repertoire of a polyclinic for the mentally ill
        You know who throws tantrums.
  2. rocket757
    rocket757 April 21 2021 12: 27
    +1
    The Ministry of Defense is introducing into the troops the concept of creating areas of "maximum protection"
    ... Okay, you can create such a zone ... and then what will be left to protect the rest of the territory? The resources are not endless.
    All the same, the most reliable, proven concept is comprehensive protection, that is, defense systems and strike weapons !!! Those. "tanks on enemy airfields"!
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee April 21 2021 12: 34
      -2
      Russophobic toad put you a minus! Warty ...
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 April 21 2021 12: 39
        -1
        He wrote in a strange, neutral, objective way ...
        I have "admirers", but usually they are excited on specific topics ... but here so, nothing specific ... strange?
        1. Uncle lee
          Uncle lee April 21 2021 13: 33
          +1
          Quote: rocket757
          strange?

          VO has become the mouthpiece of Russophobia! Small shmakodyavisty chubato-globular dirty tricks! fool
      2. novel66
        novel66 April 21 2021 13: 20
        0
        Volodya hi and you are not alone ...
        1. Uncle lee
          Uncle lee April 21 2021 13: 37
          +1
          Quote: novel xnumx
          and you

          Roma hi There is only enough intelligence and courage to put a minus! Sharovarniki, damn it burnt!
          1. Doliva63
            Doliva63 April 21 2021 18: 15
            0
            Quote: Uncle Lee
            Quote: novel xnumx
            and you

            Roma hi There is only enough intelligence and courage to put a minus! Sharovarniki, damn it burnt!

            I also slapped you a minus for Russophobic toads - emotions can be expressed without insults, and rocket757 rightly said about tanks on airfields, plusanul. Not a Russophobe, if that. hi
            1. Uncle lee
              Uncle lee April 22 2021 01: 30
              -1
              And I didn’t put a minus on you - these are the people, they ate what ... hi
              1. Doliva63
                Doliva63 April 22 2021 16: 41
                +1
                Quote: Uncle Lee
                And I didn’t put a minus on you - these are the people, they ate what ... hi

                Well, no, the "people" do not channel here, this is some kind of "preoccupied" personality, inspired by your "struggle" with a certain Russophobia on a Russian-language websitelaughing I think Russophobes, if any, sit on other sites. By definition, a Russian-speaking person cannot be a Russophobe.
                1. Uncle lee
                  Uncle lee April 23 2021 01: 14
                  +1
                  Quote: Doliva63
                  Russian speaking cannot be a Russophobe

                  How can they: Pale with a scythe, in pure Russian, called to burn Donetsk residents with atomic weapons!
                  1. Doliva63
                    Doliva63 April 23 2021 17: 56
                    0
                    Quote: Uncle Lee
                    Quote: Doliva63
                    Russian speaking cannot be a Russophobe

                    How can they: Pale with a scythe, in pure Russian, called to burn Donetsk residents with atomic weapons!

                    She is sick, what to take from her? I'm talking about normal people, of whom, fortunately, the majority.
                    1. Uncle lee
                      Uncle lee April 26 2021 10: 29
                      0
                      Quote: Doliva63
                      She is sick

                      And how many such "patients" are there in Ukraine?
                      1. Doliva63
                        Doliva63 April 26 2021 17: 16
                        +1
                        Quote: Uncle Lee
                        Quote: Doliva63
                        She is sick

                        And how many such "patients" are there in Ukraine?

                        I do not know. All of my friends are normal.
                      2. Uncle lee
                        Uncle lee April 27 2021 02: 08
                        +1
                        Quote: Doliva63
                        All are normal among my friends

                        It's good ! I'm happy for you ! hi
                      3. Doliva63
                        Doliva63 April 27 2021 15: 54
                        +1
                        Quote: Uncle Lee
                        Quote: Doliva63
                        All are normal among my friends

                        It's good ! I'm happy for you ! hi

                        Don’t make a mistake, I hope? Thank you hi
  • bk316
    bk316 April 21 2021 13: 07
    +5
    and then what is left to protect the rest of the territory?

    Marshal's shoulder straps but think like a civilian.
    Answer the questions.
    1. Who will attack the "rest of the territory" with precision weapons, that is, swamps, forests and steppes?
    2. How can these tanks be concentrated in order to crush airfields, if at first such a zone is not created in the place of concentration? But it may be necessary to concentrate where there is no echeloned air defense built in advance. In modern realities, you can't even place a MLRS battery in a position just like that without cover - it will be revealed and destroyed in the process of deployment. The article is about this.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 April 21 2021 13: 36
      -1
      Quote: bk316
      Marshal's shoulder straps but think like a civilian.

      So it is, for a long time already STAFF and I prefer to look at the problems from DIFFERENT AREAS. Question - What about us? - in society there is CONSTANTLY, which is quite logical, and even here it will be asked necessarily. And these are the citizens of our country, for whose protection our Armed Forces were created!
      Quote: bk316
      1. Who will attack the "rest of the territory" with precision weapons, that is, swamps, forests and steppes?
      But you will tell this to those who live in those territories. The country is big, people already think that capitals, big cities are somewhere out there, at the other end of the galaxy.
      Quote: bk316
      How can these tanks be concentrated to crush airfields,

      An instant, all destructive strike will not work, no one, for objective reasons ... as they wrote in our media, "war games, simulations" and showed ...
      Our "tanks" (this is a metaphor, of course), will deliver enough of what should, where it is needed!
      1. bk316
        bk316 April 21 2021 14: 17
        +2
        But you will tell this to those who live in those territories.

        Yes, the tactics of using high-precision weapons of destruction of swamps and forests do not imply.
        NOBODY HEARS NOBODY will raise an F-22 to bomb a hamlet of 3 houses.
        And to cover something large and such zones are created, read carefully.
        protection of both military and important civilian objects.


        Think about whether you need to cover from ICBMs for example Ostashkov. Of course, 20000 of our citizens live there, you say. In general, it seems to me that such comments are either stupid or simply provocative. Why? Because no one will fire ICBMs at Ostashkov. And why then waste resources on protecting it from ICBMs?

        An instant, all-destroying blow will not work, no one, for objective reasons

        And this is not about that, I wrote not a single battery will be deployed, they will find it and beat it with a drone. Therefore, the troops must be covered, but you cannot cover every battery. So what? We need to use zone cover.
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 April 21 2021 14: 33
          -1
          We are on a different wavelength ...
          1. bk316
            bk316 April 21 2021 15: 34
            +2
            Well, yes, I appreciate the military-technical side, and you are socially ideological laughing
            1. rocket757
              rocket757 April 21 2021 15: 52
              -2
              Well, so long ago I left military affairs ... so, sometimes the students stop by on a fishing trip, tell the news ... so the polygons are nearby, the most, the most, in all these matters.
              But I communicate with people a lot and their interests are closer to me, I care more.
              And since everyone knows where I served and what I did, they ask a LOT of questions!
  • Barberry25
    Barberry25 April 21 2021 13: 16
    +1
    read the last paragraph, there is just about it)
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 April 21 2021 14: 11
      -2
      The military does not disclose all the details of the new concept, it is known that they plan to use it to protect both military and important civilian objects.
      The danger is that they can simply miss it, do not understand, and again it goes, it goes, like "the centers are protecting themselves, but what about us ???"
      After massive forest / steppe fires, we have a lot of questions to the upper and local authorities ... and calmed down, the majority, only when there were a lot more fire stations, brigades, fire fighting equipment !!! Those. people react, understand what they see !!!
      Explaining such concepts to the layman is difficult, if not impossible!
      and we do not live in a vacuum, people want to be sure that they will be protected too.
      1. Barberry25
        Barberry25 April 21 2021 14: 15
        0
        laughing Well, under this brand they can skip in any situation - the task is simple - to develop a comprehensive military / air defense system to close the area completely ... But what do people need to know? The list of funds involved or the procedure for working? so that it is convenient for NATO to work?
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 April 21 2021 14: 32
          -2
          Do not consider the layman too stupid or too clever ... the layman is too trusting !!! And if he does not receive an ACCEPTABLE explanation from this side, then he will certainly be explained from the other side, but interpreting everything according to OWN !!! on the other side of the master there are interpreters !!! and channels of information, and all nonsense, do not block! I can point out / explain / slap the heels of such explanations, but ... I won't, otherwise they will write it down again as provocateurs.
          People want to live with confidence, to have well-founded hopes, they need to be supported, and not doubted.
          1. Barberry25
            Barberry25 April 21 2021 18: 18
            0
            but what difference does it make to the average man?
            1. rocket757
              rocket757 April 21 2021 19: 30
              -1
              Really no ...
              1. Barberry25
                Barberry25 April 22 2021 00: 10
                0
                in fact, the main thing is for the system to work
  • VO3A
    VO3A April 22 2021 20: 08
    -2
    He wrote in a strange, neutral, objective way ...

    Did you rate yourself?
    All the same, the most reliable, proven concept is comprehensive protection, that is, defense systems and strike weapons !!! Those. "tanks on enemy airfields"!

    And here something is difficult to understand! And there is no concept here, only political slogans! Moreover, now all the proven concepts have run out, both in you and in the Ministry of Defense in the person of the author of the article. We have the concept of nuclear deterrence. Not only works, but also saves. Once again, I repeat, the rest of our concepts are in complete stupor ... and imply huge losses in their implementation. This is also about your work: "tanks on enemy airfields" and about another invention with "on the creation of areas of maximum protection" .
    Maybe for this you are molded cons ...
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 April 22 2021 20: 59
      0
      "tanks on enemy airfields", in quotation marks, as you should have noticed ...
      It's simple, a set of measures, any necessary impact on the enemy to prevent a massive attack on our territory. Anything you need, including fierce arguments.
      Everything is according to the concept.
      And at the expense of super closed areas, the mood is skeptical, for several reasons.
  • Intruder
    Intruder April 21 2021 12: 31
    -1
    There they worked out the use of the Pole-21 electronic warfare station in the reconnaissance and strike contours. Mobile complexes accompanied battalion tactical groups, creating over them a continuous jamming zone with a radius of 50 km, thereby preventing the drones of a conventional enemy from approaching.

    and you can add:
    "Pole-21" allows you to jam the signals of the satellite systems GPS (USA), Beidou (China) and Galileo (European Union). The suppression range of receivers of satellite radio navigation systems is 25 km, the size of the radio suppression area is 150 km by 150 km.
    One radio interference post can accommodate from one to three modules, the energy potential of each of which varies in the range from 300 to 1000 W. The developer estimates the power consumed by the radio interference control equipment at 600 watts.
    Director General of STC REB Alexander Sarkisyan emphasized that Pole-21 has implemented a new principle of jamming posts control. The reliability and effectiveness of the electronic warfare system is also confirmed by the results of experimental military operation in areas with an underdeveloped communication system.
    “In addition, in the development of the Pole-21 system, effective experimental research is being carried out in the field of intelligent counteraction to global navigation satellite systems, as well as work is underway to use the capabilities of the spatially distributed electronic warfare system in the interests of conducting automated high-precision reconnaissance of mobile air objects and their route tracking. ", - noted Sarkisyan.
    The material of the top manager also says that specialists from the R&D Center of Electronic Warfare are testing a mobile remotely controlled simulator of radio communications. It can be used during exercises from the tactical to the operational-strategic level, for camouflage in order to create false areas for the deployment and actions of troops, as well as for training communications, intelligence and electronic warfare specialists.
    Another GNSS signal suppression system (by means of RF-active jamming - "a scrap version") and possibly with future implementation of the functionality: "with GPS jamming and spoofing",

    1.GPS Jamming:
    GPS jamming is a relatively uncomplicated technique that simply involves producing an RF signal strong enough to drown out the transmissions from GPS satellites. The subject of a GPS jamming attack will be instantly aware that something is wrong, as the system will be unable to produce a geolocation result. GPS jamming can be carried out either unintentionally or deliberately, and its prevalence is increasing - during an L1 and L2 GPS band monitoring campaign over just a few weeks in London, we detected significant jamming activity. This ranged from crude unmodulated sources of interference poorly centered on the L1 or L2 band to synthesized sources suggesting deliberate targeting.
    2.GPS Spoofing:
    GPS spoofing is a more insidious form of attack, which involves deliberately mimicking the form of transmissions from GPS satellites, tricking the receiver into believing that it has been sent information as expected. GPS spoofing in its simplest form (sometimes called denial-of-service spoofing) involves location information being sent to the GPS receiver which is clearly false (it might, for instance, tell a ship out at sea that it is currently located on land) ... It is immediately clear to the user that they are being spoofed, but it nonetheless stops them using their GPS system for its intended purpose. In these circumstances, spoofing basically functions as a more targeted form of jamming, that only affects GPS systems, rather than flooding the entire RF environment with noise.
    An even more subtle and complex form of GPS spoofing, deception spoofing, involves hijacking GPS systems by initially sending them correct location information (so the spoofing is not immediately obvious), and then very slowly changing the information being sent so as to, for instance , drag vessels off course into hostile waters, or disable a vessel on a sand bank.
    1. VO3A
      VO3A April 22 2021 20: 33
      -2
      There they worked out the use of the Pole-21 electronic warfare station in the reconnaissance and strike contours.

      How can you work out the use of an electronic warfare station in the RUK system, which does not exist? From the word in general !!! Why are these FAKES?
  • unaha
    unaha April 21 2021 13: 22
    -3
    A couple of such areas already exist - Idokopas, Lunnaya Polyana ...
  • Vadim Ananyin
    Vadim Ananyin April 22 2021 23: 31
    0
    And I agree with them, the access zones for weapons must be reduced and removed.
    And it makes no difference how it will be done.