Military Review

"The task is to smash to smithereens the formidable mass of the Pan-Slavic empire"

78
"The task is to smash to smithereens the formidable mass of the Pan-Slavic empire"
Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop and German Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler at Hitler's main headquarters "Wolfschlucht - Wolf's Gorge" in Belgium. 1940 g.


The first task is to undermine Slavic fertility. The second is to create and firmly root a German master class. This will allow to smash the formidable power of the Pan-Slavic empire. This is the meaning of Hitler's eastern territorial policy.

What is interesting is that the "perestroika" and "democratizers" in 1985-1990, by default, fully embodied these targets of the Hitlerite elite.

The Soviet state was torn apart under the slogans of nationalism. The Russian people in the conditions of cultural, linguistic, educational and socio-economic genocide began to die out rapidly. A class of "masters" began to form - khans, beys, oligarchs, "new Russians", "new nobles". No wonder then the patriots said that the abbreviation CIS stands for "Hitler's hopes came true."

Eastern politics and the new aristocracy


In 1932, the head of the SS Main Directorate for Race and Settlement, Richard Darre, held a conference on the main directions of eastern territorial policy (since 1933, Darre is the German Minister of Food).

With an agricultural education, Darre set out to scientifically implement National Socialist racial laws and racial hygiene. He planned to compile a large and detailed card index of the hereditary biological parameters of the Nazi elite, primarily the SS. With the consent of Himmler, he collected the genealogies of the new aristocracy in Germany. A kind of breeding book for the master breed. Himmler ordered all party members to marry only with special permission. Consent to the marriage was issued after a detailed biological study of the future spouses.

The SS Order was to become a human reserve, from which the breed of gentlemen of the Third Reich was derived (according to plans - in the future of the "world" Reich). First of all, the stake was placed on the peasantry. According to Hitler and other ideologues of the Reich, it was the peasantry that preserved the purity of the “German breed”. It displays the remnants of a healthy instinct. Old aristocratic families with good genetic data were also accepted.


Head of the Main Racial and Settlement Directorate of the SS Richard Walter Oscar Darre

Hitler's European Union


The future German empire was seen in this way. In the center is an iron core from Germany, Austria, Moravia and the Czech Republic. The Bohemian-Moravian region, the eastern regions bordering the Reich, will be inhabited by the Germans. Chekhov must be resettled to the East, to the Ukraine or to Siberia. Then a wreath of small and dependent state entities subordinated to the Reich. The Germanized Baltic states, dismembered Poland, Hungary, disassembled into parts of Serbia and Croatia, Romania. Ukraine, torn into several independent parts, South Russian and Caucasian states. Union of auxiliary peoples, all connected by common armed forces (Germanic), common economy and currency, common foreign policy.

In the west it will be the same as in the east. Western Federation, subordinate to the Reich. Holland, Flanders, North Franconia. Northern Federation. Denmark, Sweden and Norway.

However, this whole structure has no future if a systematic policy of population and people's extermination is not pursued. The Nazis believed that the high fertility of the Eastern Slavs posed a great danger to the Nordic race. Irony stories, now the white peoples of all of Europe are rapidly aging and dying out. In 50–70 years, most of the European world will become part of Africa and Asia, with small sprinkles of rapidly aging white communities, once the indigenous peoples of Europe.

It was noted at the conference that the agrarian policy of the Bolsheviks, that is, the distribution of large land holdings to the peasants, significantly increased their birth rate. Therefore, it is necessary to free Russians from the land, to make them farm laborers and unskilled workers in order to reduce fertility. The land must be handed over to the ruling class. Only the Germans should be the big landowners in the whole East.

It is interesting how exactly the Nazis determined the connection between the people and the land with its fertility. Nowadays, the urban "office plankton", in essence, laborers and unskilled workers, give birth to either very few children, or even abandon families and children altogether. It is simply not economically viable. Under the capitalist (parasitic-predatory) and consumerist system, the rule of materialism, the Russians, like other peoples of the white race, are doomed to extinction. Everything is aimed at biological survival, the race of pleasure (hedonism) and consumption. Children in such a world will not give birth. This is a burden, huge material costs, time, energy, the inability to consume ourselves according to the standards set by the media and TV.

Class hierarchy and school destruction


Darre noted that the first task in the East is to undermine Slavic fertility. The second task is to create and firmly root a class of masters. Consciously restore the class order, or at least the hierarchical structure. At the very top is the new upper aristocracy, the master class, the hierarchically organized party (the new middle class), the employee class. Below all will be a layer of enslaved foreigners, new slaves.

Education and knowledge pose a threat to the elite. The ideal of universal education must be destroyed. Knowledge must acquire the character of a secret teaching, cease to be publicly available. Will become a means of dominating people.

Hitler noted that universal and accessible education must be destroyed.

"General education is the most corrosive and caustic poison invented by liberalism for its own destruction."

Each class and step in the hierarchy has its own school. Freedom of education is the privilege of the elite and those whom it will admit to this privilege. The broad masses of the lower classes should be gifted with illiteracy.

Thus, the Russian liberals, having defeated and "optimized" the Soviet (Russian) school, in essence, only implemented the plans of Hitler and his henchmen (The agony of the Russian school; Russia is being turned into a country of fools). Only secretly, by default.

Hiding behind beautiful slogans and words about the development of humanitarian technologies, the advanced experience of the West, modernization, innovation, optimization, digitalization, etc. And at the exit, schoolchildren can only write and read (worse and worse, degrading under the influence of digital devices).

Degradation, digital dementia and crowds of new barbarians, both whites and migrants from the global South.

Above - new gentlemen, masters of the new world order, the global "Babylon".
Author:
Photos used:
https://ru.wikipedia.org/, http://waralbum.ru/
78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. apro
    apro April 21 2021 04: 12
    -1
    Unexpectedly. Plans of AGitler are being fulfilled in Russia today.
    Is it not a communist author ??
    1. Lech from Android.
      Lech from Android. April 21 2021 04: 36
      +15
      Is it not a communist author ??

      Our forum member Tatra will popularly explain to you who is a communist and who is an enemy of the communists.
      And so the author laid out the problems of our society as they are, comparing them with the plans of the Nazi leadership of Hitlerite Germany.
      Partly he's right, partly wrong. Urbanization of cities and the destruction of the peasant way of life are objective reasons for the decline in our population.
      This is followed by bloody wars, various revolutions, perestroika also reducing the number of people, followed by the policy of various destructive structures destroying the family, migrants and hired workers with their mentality from abroad also destructively affect us ... displacing the indigenous people from their places ... then comes the destruction of a person's personality by our media making him an egoistic consumer ... there are a number of reasons that contribute to the decline in the number of our people.
      Alas ... so far I do not see a serious reverse process ... an attempt to solve this fundamental problem by maternity capital is not a serious decision ... There must be a whole range of strategic decisions at the state level.
      1. Far B
        Far B April 21 2021 04: 54
        +14
        Urbanization of cities and the destruction of the peasant way of life are objective reasons for the decline in our population
        These are the objective reasons for the decline growth the size of our population, and not the size as such. Absolutely different things. Until the collapse of the Soviet Union, there was an increase in the country, although urbanization had been going on for a long time. But with the collapse of the USSR, demography somehow sharply went into the minus. So, after all, it’s not about urbanization, but about the feeling of confidence in our own future ..
        1. Lech from Android.
          Lech from Android. April 21 2021 05: 13
          +7
          а
          in a sense of confidence in their own future ..

          The chairman of the consumer union Pyotr Shelishch submitted a proposal to the Russian government to raise electricity tariffs, ostensibly to save money ... what confidence can there be in the future if Prime Minister Mishustin implements his proposal.
          Another sabotage against our ordinary citizens, am for such proposals this chairman should be sent to develop the northern territories of Russia for 25 years.
        2. Korsar4
          Korsar4 April 21 2021 05: 20
          +11
          Probably a combination of these factors.
          The style is changing.
          It's one thing - one more working hands on the farm.
          Another is an extra mouth when the mortgage is for 25 years.
        3. andrew42
          andrew42 April 21 2021 18: 35
          0
          Both factors play a role. And when they work in pairs, we get a modern result.
        4. Ka-52
          Ka-52 April 22 2021 12: 24
          0
          Until the collapse of the Soviet Union, there was an increase in the country, although urbanization had been going on for a long time. But with the collapse of the USSR, demography somehow sharply went into negative territory.

          you take the USSR, its demographic dynamics at the expense of the Asian republics and mold it to the Russian Federation, with its predominantly Russian population. For example: in the USSR, the number of births per woman in the RFSR accounted for 2,3 children, and per woman from the Asian republics - 5,8. Here is your demography in the USSR.
      2. apro
        apro April 21 2021 05: 54
        -1
        Quote: Lech from Android.
        Partly he's right, partly wrong.

        Well said, nothing can be said.
        The fact that today is capitalism, which is not interested in anything other than profit on the pocket, it is a fact, but the majority of the population likes it, because they can also become rich and influential. comfort zone. work more.
        And to say that today in the Russian Federation is not Russian power. Also funny. The most real Russian.
      3. tatra
        tatra April 21 2021 07: 14
        -4
        The enemies of the communists are those who, since Perestroika, have justified Hitler and the Nazis who attacked the USSR and the Soviet people, and blamed 27 million Soviet citizens killed by the Nazis as "victims of Stalin" accusing Stalin of both unleashing World War II and the Great Patriotic War, and those who so diligently portray themselves as "great philanthropists" in slandering the Communist Bolsheviks, proved that you do not care about the multimillion supermortality of the people after you captured the USSR, and about the huge demographic damage of tens of millions of people that you inflicted on the people on the territory of the captured USSR.
        1. Boris55
          Boris55 April 21 2021 07: 41
          -7
          Quote: tatra
          The enemies of the communists are those who, since Perestroika, justify Hitler

          Perestroika is already berries, and the flowers are those who banned the misanthropic ideology set forth in Mein Kampf. Its study is necessary in high school and universities. At the same time, it is necessary to show the result of it (death camps, documentary films), invite WWII veterans to such lessons, etc. But the Trotskyist government cannot allow this, to give knowledge to people on management - this is like death for them.

          If the study of Mein Kampf in the USSR had been properly staged, then perestroika would simply not be possible.
          1. tatra
            tatra April 21 2021 07: 49
            -8
            What does Hitler have to do with the fact that the enemies of the communists seized the USSR for the purpose of personal enrichment by robbing their country and people, and libel against the Bolshevik communists, with the automatic justification of the crimes of their external and internal enemies, including justification of the crimes of the invaders of Russia, the invaders, Hitler and Hitlerites-they have the only justification for the capture of the USSR in 30 years?
            1. Boris55
              Boris55 April 21 2021 07: 57
              -9
              Quote: tatra
              What does Hitler have to do with the fact that the enemies of the communists captured the USSR

              Not Hitler, but his ideology set forth in Mein Kampf. Hiding management knowledge from society allows this society to manipulate those who have this knowledge.

              The Bolsheviks saved Russia from destruction during the civil war and during the Second World War. Those who were not involved took advantage of their successes.
              During "perestroika" the whole country was occupied (in the Second World War ~ 10%).
              Nationalization will probably be carried out by the 24th year.

              And once again: If the study of Mein Kampf in the USSR had been properly staged, then perestroika would simply not be possible.
              1. Lech from Android.
                Lech from Android. April 21 2021 08: 27
                +1
                I read Mein Kampf from cover to cover, indeed, a lot became clear in the actions of Hitler and the reasons for the extermination of peoples by Hitler's Nazi regime.
                Too frankly, Hitler described the shortcomings of capitalism there
                , therefore they forbade students to study his scribble.
                The fragile minds of young people can be negatively affected.
                1. Boris55
                  Boris55 April 21 2021 08: 56
                  -2
                  Quote: Lech from Android.
                  The fragile minds of young people can be negatively affected.

                  Therefore, it is necessary that the teachers correctly convey this information, form the correct worldview, and not hide or even leave fragile minds alone with her.
              2. Hlavaty
                Hlavaty April 21 2021 08: 55
                +7
                Quote: Boris55
                And once again: If the study of Mein Kampf in the USSR had been properly staged, then perestroika would simply not be possible.

                This is not a panacea. Perestroika was advertised as a further development of socialism and the methods outlined in Mein Kampf did not reach immediately.
                The collapse of the USSR was ensured by the decayed elite of the party and economic bodies. Strong ties emerged between the party economic elite and the shadow criminal economy in which a lot of money was spinning. In fact, by the 80s, a fairly large number of underground millionaires appeared in the USSR, whom the USSR prevented from using their wealth openly and did not give the opportunity to openly realize their philistine quirks (yachts, football clubs, escort girls, etc.). On this basis, they sang with Western intelligence services and politicians for the joint destruction of the USSR.
                In this situation, you can teach anything you want, but if people in power decided to destroy the country, then only terror on the scale of the 30s could stop them. Stalin is needed for this.
                But after the Stalinists, the Khrushchevs come and ruin all the achievements of their predecessor.


                The main reason for the death of the USSR was that the communists stopped developing their theory. We settled on Marx and Lenin, who mainly analyzed capitalism and ways of destroying the capitalist state. But they had very vague ideas about how to build a non-capitalist state. A striking example is Lenin's work "State and Revolution" - when it comes to the future society, Lenin's imagination does not extend beyond the "armed workers", equalization and election of leaders.
                At one time, Stalin felt this and began to kick his learned Marxist philosophers so that they would develop Marxism further. In his work "Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR," he wrote that Marx spoke well about capitalism, but there is no capitalism in the USSR and it is required to analyze the built socialism in order to understand how to develop society further. But no worthy scientists were found then, and soon Stalin was killed. And his successors began to enjoy power and life, rather than building and developing a new society.
                And after Khrushchev declared that "the current generation will live under communism," even those who believed in communism realized that at the very top they did not have the slightest idea about communism and where to move society further.
                And they all went into "improving the welfare of the people," meaning by this clothes, food, apartments, furniture, etc.
                After that, the essence of the USSR ceased to differ from other capitalist states.
                The struggle has moved from the realm of ideology to the realm of control over material resources.
                1. Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
                  Paragraph Epitafievich Y. April 21 2021 13: 21
                  +4
                  Quote: Hlavaty
                  The main reason for the death of the USSR was that the communists stopped developing their theory. We settled on Marx and Lenin, who mainly analyzed capitalism and ways to destroy the capitalist state. But they had very vague ideas about how to build a non-capitalist state.

                  And a vivid example of this type of commie is the aunt Tatra present here)
                  This warlike lady in a dusty helmet is ready to verbally fight "enemies of the communists" (c), imaginary friends of communists, opportunists, liberals, bourgeois, capitalists and other angry birds, throwing her angry philippics at them! laughing BUT! On an elementary question about constructive proposals, he again begins to orate, reducing everything to the vileness of notorious enemies, etc. - like Zhvanetsky: "In general, he left the answer."
                2. andrew42
                  andrew42 April 21 2021 18: 52
                  0
                  Vladimir, very correctly described. And there is. Philosophy of the existence of society - Ideological manual - Economic model - Political opportunities. The elimination of the first leads to ossification of the second, decay of the third and the loss of the fourth.
          2. Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
            Paragraph Epitafievich Y. April 21 2021 08: 30
            +3
            Quote: Boris55
            Mein Kampf. Its study is necessary in high school and universities.

            Have you mastered it yourself?
            Quote: Boris55
            invite WWII veterans to such lessons

            Leave the WWII veterans alone, dear. By simple manipulations with the calculator, you can establish the age of the "youngest" of those who managed to fight. Pay tribute to the old people, and do not drag them around school matinees ...
            Quote: Boris55
            If the study of Mein Kampf in the USSR had been properly staged, then perestroika would simply not be possible.

            Don't talk nonsense. Scheme from an Arabic saying
            Show them death - they'll come to terms with the fever
            doesn't work here. Don't pull on the owl.
        2. Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
          Paragraph Epitafievich Y. April 21 2021 12: 01
          0
          Quote: tatra
          The enemies of the communists are those who, since Perestroika, justify Hitler and the Nazis

          A specific example, please, excuse Hitler.
  2. Vladimir_2U
    Vladimir_2U April 21 2021 04: 13
    -2
    Degradation, digital dementia and crowds of new barbarians, both whites and migrants from the global South.


    Of course, consolation is weak, but this is also true in relation to the enemy's population.
  3. Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 21 2021 05: 13
    +2
    Well, the author cried, and ........ dumped into the mud?
    Said A, say B, or keep your mouth shut.
    1. Andrey Korotkov
      Andrey Korotkov April 21 2021 05: 29
      +3
      Quote: Ros 56
      Well, the author cried, and ........ dumped into the mud?
      Said A, say B, or keep your mouth shut.

      hi I agree, as a morning note (would not offend the author) - short, cloudy, cloudy and no precipitation (conclusions) winked
      1. Korsar4
        Korsar4 April 21 2021 06: 09
        +5
        Precipitation will fall.
        Not in relation to the topic of discussion, you can do without a number of components. There would be quality.
  4. Olgovich
    Olgovich April 21 2021 06: 54
    -5
    What is interesting is that the "perestroika" and "democratizers" in 1985-1990, by default, fully embodied these targets of the Hitlerite elite.

    The Soviet state was torn apart under the slogans of nationalism. The Russian people in the conditions of cultural, linguistic, educational and socio-economic genocide began to die out rapidly

    yes no, author: Russia was one of the first large countries in which fertility has dropped below the replacement level generations. It happened in 1964 year, // www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2006/0267/tema03.php.

    And by 1990 already THIRD of the population of Russia 21 regions lived in conditions where the number of deaths exceeded the number of births. And this is the result of the PREVIOUS pre-perestroika.
    The Soviet state was torn apart under the slogans of nationalism


    so who brought up these Nazis from all these republican unions of writers (99% are ardent Nazis and Russophobes), journalists and other "elites"?
    Who printed them, nominated them, glorified them, awarded them and so forth?

    For example, a member of the CPSU, secretary of the Central Committee of the Komsomol, laureate of all kinds of prizes, avor of poetry about Lenin, etc. Dabija wrote the following about the Russians:

    :
    from mixed marriages with Russian bandits and prostitutes are born.

    According to unofficial, but reliable data, 60% of mentally ill people come from mixed families, 70% of criminals have parents of different nationalities, religions or races, 80% of prostitutes and more than 50% of politicians in the ruling party are born from mixed marriages. And not a single genius.

    Children born in mixed marriages are mediocre individuals at best, and usually disabled, criminals, and losers. Children raised in mixed families are notoriously insecure, predisposed to mental disorders, crimes and prostitution ",


    Or another "sings":
    "If a Russian asks you for a piece of bread, give him a piece of dynamite"


    And there are thousands of them. And it was they who led the nationalists, providing them with ideology, slogans, leaders, etc.
    1. tatra
      tatra April 21 2021 07: 22
      -5
      Do not need "footcloths". In short, your enemies of the communists, together with your Yeltsin-Putin regime IMPOSED by you in 1991, a 30-year-old cowardly ideology "and we have nothing to do with it, it's all the communists are to blame", including "Lenin's bomb", "galoshes", "the Bolsheviks destroyed our country and our party ", and" and we have nothing to do with it, it was in the USSR, we are still loosening it. " All of you have nothing to do with the fact that you, as occupiers and colonialists, have siphoned a lot of money from Russia and the Russian people, taken out of Russia a lot of natural resources and raw materials.
      1. Civil
        Civil April 21 2021 07: 29
        -1
        Quote: tatra
        Do not need "footcloths". In short, your enemies of the communists, together with your Yeltsin-Putin regime IMPOSED by you in 1991, a 30-year-old cowardly ideology "and we have nothing to do with it, it's all the communists are to blame", including "Lenin's bomb", "galoshes", "the Bolsheviks destroyed our country and our party ", and" and we have nothing to do with it, it was in the USSR, we are still loosening it. " All of you have nothing to do with the fact that you, as occupiers and colonialists, have siphoned a lot of money from Russia and the Russian people, taken out of Russia a lot of natural resources and raw materials.

        I subscribe to every word.
      2. Boris55
        Boris55 April 21 2021 07: 49
        -6
        Quote: tatra
        in 1991 your Yeltsin-Putin government 30-year-old cowardly ideology

        Yeltsin: "God bless America."
        Biden: Pctin the killer? - yeah.

        Patience. By the end of Putin's presidency (possibly with the new Duma), the red banner will once again become a symbol of Russia.

        TO THE QUESTION ABOUT THE HISTORICAL PAST OF THE "RUSSIAN" TRICOLOR:
        http://fct-altai.ru/files/2021/Tricolor_09_04_2021.doc
        1. apro
          apro April 21 2021 08: 10
          0
          Quote: Boris55
          Patience. By the end of Putin's presidency (possibly with the new Duma), the red banner will once again become a symbol of Russia.

          Boris you're wrong. (Sorry for the familiarity)
          what to do with the bourgeoisie wake up ???
          1. Boris55
            Boris55 April 21 2021 08: 14
            -3
            Quote: apro
            what to do with the bourgeoisie wake up ???

            "Our" bourgeoisie appointed by the State Department are simply wallet holders, nothing more. At the first "naughty" these wallets will be emptied with one keystroke due to a puddle.

            Baydon directly tells them - Putin is a murderer, kill him, but they can no longer ... not kill, not carry out another perestroika.

            ps
            Baydon's desire strangely coincides with the Tatra's desire ...
            1. apro
              apro April 21 2021 11: 05
              +1
              Quote: Boris55
              At the first "naughty" these wallets will be emptied with one keystroke due to a puddle.

              The wallets of the population will be emptied more likely. The bourgeois, as always, will not suffer in any way. This is about butterflies. But seriously, today the entire economy of the Russian Federation is capitalistic. And it will not work in any other way.
        2. Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
          Paragraph Epitafievich Y. April 21 2021 08: 33
          0
          Quote: Boris55
          By the end of Putin's presidency (possibly with the new Duma), the red banner will once again become a symbol of Russia.

          Will not.
          1. Boris55
            Boris55 April 21 2021 08: 46
            -5
            Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
            Will not.

            Will become. The tricolor no longer corresponds to the status of Russia:

            "... The tricolor, which was approved as a state for Russia on November 01, 1991, consisting of three horizontal stripes (with the upper stripe being white) means that Russia has no right to conduct its sovereign foreign and domestic policy ... ". Link to the full text of the post above.

            We are pursuing an independent foreign (and global) policy. Internal policy is always inscribed in a higher policy and cannot go beyond its framework. Changing the flag is a matter of time. One polar world is over. We are already one of the poles of the many polar world.

            ps
            Types of politics existing in the world:

            1. Global policy - the policy pursued by the authorities in relation to all citizens of the world.
            2. Foreign policy - the policy pursued by the authorities in relation to citizens of other countries;
            3. Domestic policy - the policy pursued by the authorities in relation to their citizens;
            1. Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
              Paragraph Epitafievich Y. April 21 2021 08: 56
              +3
              Quote: Boris55
              We are pursuing an independent foreign (and global) policy.

              Examples of the global policy of the Russian Federation, taking into account your
              Quote: Boris55
              ps
              Types of politics existing in the world:
              - global politics - the policy pursued by the authorities in relation to all citizens of the World.

              can you give?
              And this nonsense:
              Quote: Boris55
              "The tricolor, which was approved as state for Russia on November 01, 1991, consisting of three horizontal stripes (with the upper stripe being white) means that Russia has no right to conduct its sovereign foreign and domestic policy."

              where from? Can you find out the source of this funny revelation?
              And how, interestingly, do the colors of the state flag influence something in foreign policy? This is already some kind of unhealthy Suprematism. And the red flag, therefore, will be a signal to the whole world that Soviet foreign policy values ​​and traditions have returned? Yes, it’s hard to come up with a more powerful incentive to alienate the marginalized. As far as I understand, you are dreaming of autarchy?
              1. Boris55
                Boris55 April 21 2021 09: 00
                -7
                Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
                Examples of global policy of the Russian Federation

                In the World, the ability to pursue a global policy for civilizations is Western civilization, the civilization of the East and the civilization of Russia.

                Western civilization - these are many different countries, dependent on one dominant one, which imposes its own culture and suppresses the culture of others.

                Civilization of Russia - these are many peoples living in one state, preserving their culture and developing it. Some peoples who did not have their own written language (Kazakhstan) were able to get it.


                Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
                whence?

                The link in my post above is highlighted in blue.
                1. Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
                  Paragraph Epitafievich Y. April 21 2021 09: 23
                  +1
                  Quote: Boris55
                  and civilization Russia.

                  Quote: Boris55
                  The civilization of Russia is

                  Oh ok. The world is uncontrollably heading towards globalization and intellectual decadence, we are also vollens-nevolens involved in this process technologically and mentally, and you are clinging to some kind of naphthalene archaic.
                  Quote: Boris55
                  The civilization of Russia is many peoples living in one state

                  This is the Soviet model. Do not substitute concepts. Having written "Rus", you have already imperatively singled out the titular nation.
                  Quote: Boris55
                  Some peoples who did not have their own written language (Kazakhstan) were able to get it.

                  Of course, in the course of continental expansion. And what about kulturtragerstvo? Guarani, as a result of the conquest, also received writing and spoke in Portuguese.
                  1. Boris55
                    Boris55 April 21 2021 10: 15
                    -6
                    About global politics. There are three world control centers in the world - this is the United States, this is China and this is Russia. The life of all people on the planet depends on their decisions.

                    Globalization in the World, as the most effective way of doing business, is an objective process, but who will lead it is a subjective process.



                    Globalization according to the Western scenario is collapsing.

                    Russia, Russia, the USSR is a multinational, multi-confessional state-civilization.

                    Russians are all those who think not about their clan, but about all the peoples living in this territory. Every inhabitant of the Earth can become a Russian. Stalin's expression was heard: "I am a Russian Georgian." Many peoples of Russia can also say this about themselves - I am a Russian Jew, I am a Russian Tatar, etc.

                    The future and hope of all the inhabitants of the Earth is the structure of society according to the principle of Russia, where each nation feels equal among equals.

                    Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
                    Of course, in the course of continental expansion.

                    Kazakhstan, Georgia and others themselves have repeatedly asked for the protection of Russia, realizing that only as part of Russia will they be able to preserve their identity. This understanding reached the elder Kadyrov ...
                    1. Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
                      Paragraph Epitafievich Y. April 21 2021 11: 27
                      +1
                      Quote: Boris55
                      There are three world control centers in the world - this is the United States, this is China and this is Russia.

                      And how, I wonder, does Russia rule the world?
                      Quote: Boris55
                      If you scrape each Russian, you will surely find its roots in Vyatichi, Krivichi, earthlings, etc.

                      laughing This is a pearl. Not a member of the Society of Anonymous Anthropologists?
      3. Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
        Paragraph Epitafievich Y. April 21 2021 08: 18
        +1
        Quote: tatra
        that you, as occupiers and colonialists

        Okay, Auntie Tatra, let's move from this rallying whining and angry pathetic denunciations to concrete measures to remedy the situation. What do your neo-communists offer? Of course, the choral singing of the International and Sharikov's maxim "take away and divide" should not be offered. The election-campaigning strategy also does not suit you in view of the obvious futility for your business. The passionary path is also not an option - there is neither a driving force, nor those who are in the potential to lead and direct. As far as I understand, there are no people willing to sponsor you either. The army is not with you. Obese populism is not a driver. There is, of course, the most effective of all known stimuli to bloody metamorphosis - loss of the empire in the war. Type
        The revolutionary class in a reactionary war cannot but wish to defeat its government. This is an axiom.

        So what's the bottom line?
      4. Olgovich
        Olgovich April 21 2021 09: 28
        -9
        Quote: tatra
        ... All of you have nothing to do with the fact that you, as occupiers and colonialists,

        Enemies of the communists, you forgot that it was YOURS who destroyed HALF of the settlements of Russia from 1969 to 1989, (see the USSR census), as a result of which happened depopulation about wildness huge territories, YOUR closed during this time more than half of rural schools, in 10% of the remaining there was no ELECTRICITY, with YOUR a third of the harvest went to sleepg (not needed by anyone), YOURS have led to the extinction of Russia since 1964:
        by 1990, already a THIRD of the population of Russia in 21 regions lived in conditions when the number of deaths exceeded the number of births.
        .

        it was YOURS that led to the catastrophe of the collapse of the country in 1991 - for except YOURS, there was no one above, hack it on your forehead - no Socialist-Revolutionaries, no monarchists, no one, some KPSS
        1. Foul skeptic
          Foul skeptic April 21 2021 13: 41
          +3
          for besides YOURS, there was no one above

          A murderer baptized as a child, blessing water for Baptism, painting eggs on Easter holidays and answering people "Truly is Risen" on Christmas, a) discredits Christianity? b) is a Christian?
          1. Olgovich
            Olgovich April 22 2021 06: 13
            0
            Quote: A vile skeptic
            for besides YOURS, there was no one above

            A murderer baptized as a child, blessing water for Baptism, painting eggs on Easter holidays and answering people "Truly is Risen" on Christmas, a) discredits Christianity? b) is a Christian?

            belay fool lol Lavrov well and succinctly answered ...
            1. Foul skeptic
              Foul skeptic April 22 2021 08: 23
              0
              Lavrov answered well and succinctly ...

              When asked if a murderer is a Christian? Ah yes Sergey Viktorovich, he has time for everything, what a fine fellow.
              That is, it is useless to wait for an answer to this question from YOU? Probably very difficult. But you would at least try, or something.
          2. Grim Reaper
            Grim Reaper April 22 2021 23: 22
            0
            Quote: A vile skeptic
            for besides YOURS, there was no one above

            A murderer baptized as a child, blessing water for Baptism, painting eggs on Easter holidays and answering people "Truly is Risen" on Christmas, a) discredits Christianity? b) is a Christian?

            "Truly Risen" is not Christmas.
            1. Foul skeptic
              Foul skeptic April 23 2021 08: 20
              0
              Yes, stupid mistake, thanks for the amendment.
      5. andrew42
        andrew42 April 21 2021 18: 42
        0
        So them, rogue "beavers"! These modern Alchens have already gotten with their 30-year-old "we have nothing to do with". Nothing, nothing, the time will come "Well, Koschey, it's time to answer for the" fool "!"
    2. Far B
      Far B April 21 2021 08: 09
      +1
      fertility has dropped below the level of simple generational replacement. It happened in 1964
      However, you got it with your lies. Here are the figures below, with a link to the same demoscope. Where is the natural decline ??? 1964 is 19 years after the war, then the veterans were still leaving their wounds with might and main, nevertheless the population grew!
      In the USSR:
      year 1959 the number of Russians - 114 113 579 increase (%) + 14,58%
      In the RSFSR:
      year 1959 the number of Russians - 97 863 579 + 8,37%

      In the USSR:
      year 1970 the number of Russians - 129 015 140 increase (%) + 13,06%
      In the RSFSR:
      year 1970 the number of Russians - 107 747 630 increase (%) + 10,10%

      As for the author Vishnevsky:
      Director of the Institute of Demography, Higher School of Economics
      HSE! Already says a lot, right? The main task of the HSE is to denigrate everything that is Soviet.
      As for the Demoscope:
      Demoscope Weekly is published with the support of:
      United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) - www.unfpa.org (since 2001)
      John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation - www.macfound.ru (since 2004)
      Russian Foundation for the Humanities - www.rfh.ru (since 2004)
      National Institute for Demographic Research (INED) - www.ined.fr (since 2004)
      UNESCO - portal.unesco.org (2001), UNESCO Moscow Office - www.unesco.ru (2005)
      Open Society Institute (Soros Foundation) - www.osi.ru (2001-2002)

      Providing such links is as if not out of a big mind at all.
      1. Olgovich
        Olgovich April 21 2021 10: 42
        -9
        Quote: Dalny V
        However, you got it with your lies. Here are the figures below, with a link to the same demoscope. Where is the natural decline ??? 1964 is 19 years after the war, then the veterans were still leaving their wounds with might and main, nevertheless the population grew!

        you got it with your dense IGNORANCE: there was no decline yet, and extinction has already started-for fertility has dropped below the level of simple generational replacement. , the population is rapidly AGING, there are few young people, there is no one to give birth to - which led to a LEGAL decline already in the 1980s

        Didn't get it, didn't it? fool
        Quote: Dalny V
        Providing such links is as if not out of a big mind at all.


        there are links to statistics and monographs-Danilov and pr-try to refute them, ignoramus.
        1. Foul skeptic
          Foul skeptic April 21 2021 12: 57
          +2
          Quote: Olgovich
          Quote: Dalny V
          Providing such links is as if not out of a big mind at all.


          there are links to statistics and monographs-Danilov and pr-try to refute them, ignoramus.

          belay
          Where exactly? According to your link (and Dalny V speaks specifically about the article from Demoscope you proposed)? So in this article there is not a single link to sources of information (neither to statistical data, nor to a monograph).
          1. Olgovich
            Olgovich April 21 2021 14: 13
            -7
            Quote: Nefarious skeptic
            Where?

            In e
            do not meddle in someone else's conversation, especially if you do not understand what it is about.
            1. Foul skeptic
              Foul skeptic April 21 2021 14: 19
              +2
              1) Read what a forum is.
              2) Where in the article on your link "links to statistics and monographs"?
              there are links
              1. Olgovich
                Olgovich April 21 2021 14: 39
                -8
                Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                1) Read what a forum is

                learn what "obsession" and "intrusiveness" are
                Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                2) Where in the article on your link "links to statistics and monographs"


                read what was discussed:
                Far V (Mikhail)
                Today, 08: 09

                Concerning Demoscope:

                Demoscope Weekly is published with the support of:
                United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) - www.unfpa.org (since 2001)
                John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation - www.macfound.ru (since 2004)
                Russian Foundation for the Humanities - www.rfh.ru (since 2004)

                the person already writes about the demoscope AT ALL.

                Finally? fool
                Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                You wrote that in the 80s the population had already begun to decline. So confirm your words that the population of Russia is decreasing in the 80s.

                ANOTHER HUNDRED times read the 1st and the next comments if not received again.

                tell me, WHY do I have to collect parts of the comments for you so that you understand something? belay

                Who are you? didn’t understand and okay ..

                tired. and
                1. Foul skeptic
                  Foul skeptic April 21 2021 15: 41
                  +1
                  learn what "obsession" and "intrusiveness" are

                  Maybe this is when a person from article to article writes the same nonsense, despite the fact that he is shown that it is nonsense?
                  Aren't you intrusively imposing them by this? tongue
                  the person is already writing about the demoscope AT ALL

                  Oh, in general ... well, this of course changes the matter))) If some principle is applicable to the GENERAL, then it should be applicable to the PRIVATE. You "ask" the person to refute the links and monographs that the demoscope uses in its articles:
                  there are links to statistics and monographs-Danilov and pr-try to refute them, ignoramus.

                  We have a specific article (PRIVATE) on Demoscope (GENERAL) that you linked to. Now tell us what references to what statistics and to what monographs he needs to refute in THIS SPECIFIC article? If they are not there. And if the article (PRIVATE) does NOT support anything written in it, then why do you think without reservations that on Demoscope (GENERAL)
                  every figure is justified
                  ?
                  So gullible?
                  PS Don't mention Danilova. To show the level of reliability of her "work" is a matter of five conditional minutes on a couple of simple illustrative examples. Five more minutes to explain why this "work" came into being at all.
                  Read the 1st and subsequent comments ANOTHER HUNDRED times, if it does not come again

                  Yes, even two hundred times, the words about population decline in the 80s will not disappear from this. I understand that you are trying to add the 21 region phrase to this error. But it doesn’t come in. tongue
                  1. Foul skeptic
                    Foul skeptic April 21 2021 16: 10
                    +1
                    PS Don't mention Danilova. To show the level of reliability of her "work" is a matter of five conditional minutes on a couple of simple illustrative examples. Five more minutes to explain why this "work" came into being at all.

                    This is my joint. Of course, only if you meant Danilova, not Denisov. Because after this
                    it was YOURS who destroyed HALF of the settlements of Russia from 1969 to 1989, (see the census of the USSR) as a result of which there was depopulation of vast territories, YOUR closed during this time more than half of rural schools, in 10% of the remaining there was no ELECTRICITY, with YOUR third of the harvest went under the snow (no one needed on the IR)

                    I thought about her.
                  2. Olgovich
                    Olgovich April 22 2021 06: 32
                    -1
                    Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                    Maybe this is when a person writes from article to article alone and the same nonsensedespite the fact that he is shown that this is nonsense?

                    and stop write them, ignorance. lol
                    Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                    Now tell us what references to what statistics and to what monographs he needs to refute in THIS SPECIFIC article?

                    IN THIS SPECIFIC DEMOSCOPE, let him refute
                    Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                    PS Don't mention Danilov. Show the level of reliability of her "work" is a matter of five conditional minutes on a couple of simple illustrative examples. Five more minutes to explain why this "work" came into being at all.

                    lolALREADY shown: sclerosis, dementia, confusion of consciousness, thoughts, images, surnames, themes... lol


                    Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                    I understand that you are trying to add the phrase about 21 areas to this error. ...

                    Reached since .... HUNDRED TIMES? lol

                    Shame ....
                    1. Foul skeptic
                      Foul skeptic April 22 2021 08: 56
                      -1
                      so stop writing them, ignorance

                      wassat
                      My native Russian speech. tongue
                      ALREADY showed: sclerosis, dementia, confusion of consciousness, thoughts, images, surnames, those ...

                      Nobody is free from mistakes. Only a few themselves see their mistakes and immediately report them. And some are ready to say that 3,41 is more than 3,88 or 527 is more than 3204, as in a very recent conversation.
                      If you were talking about Danilova, what about - Inna, Irina? Or maybe it was Danilov, not Danilova? I'm not just asking))) Then I will be interested in which monograph of the above persons could have been referred to by Demoscope, which would be relevant to the discussion between us on this topic lol tongue
                      Reached since .... HUNDRED TIMES?

                      The fact that you were trying to weave 21 areas here was immediately clear. But I kind of clearly wrote to you that this has nothing to do with the content of the phrase about the loss in the 80s. Here is a chronology of questions and answers between you and Far B:
                      Quote: Olgovich
                      Russia was one of the first large countries in which fertility fell below the level of simple generational replacement. It happened in 1964
                      Quote: Far In
                      However, you got it with your lies. Here are the figures below, with a link to the same demoscope. Where is the natural decline ??? 1964 is 19 years after the war, then the veterans were still leaving their wounds with might and main, nevertheless the population grew!

                      Quote: Olgovich
                      you got it with your dense IGNORANCE: there was no loss yet, but extinction has already begun, because the birth rate has dropped below the level of simple replacement of generations. , the population is rapidly AGING, there are few young people, there is no one to give birth to, which led to a LEGAL declines already in the 1980s

                      Your conversation was about Russia as a whole. But when you were once again dunked into your lie, you had to twist and weave 21 areas. What makes no sense is 21 admin units, not 89 admin units. And if, WITH A GENERAL INCREASE in the population in Russia, in some 21 regions there were more deaths in a certain limited period, this means that in the remaining 68 admin units the births turned out to be much HIGHER than the number of deaths than the national average. Explain on sticks how in first grade?
                      Well, give the names, please, of these 21 areas. There is a very high suspicion that these will turn out to be areas that were occupied.
                      1. Olgovich
                        Olgovich April 22 2021 10: 01
                        -2
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        My native Russian speech

                        don't understand your Russian lol

                        Learn what is "conversion" in Russian, ignorance.

                        Shame ....
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        Nobody is free from mistakes. Only some themselves they see their mistakes and report them immediately.

                        you lie. But as always.
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        If you were talking about Danilova, then which one - Inna, Irina? Or maybe it was Danilov, not Danilova? I'm not just asking))) Then me will interest which monograph of the above persons could Demoscope refer to, which would be relevant to the discussion between us on this topic

                        1.I don't care about your interests. Why on earth? belay

                        2. When you learn Russian, then it will come to who. This is not an educational program, ignorance
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        The fact that you were trying to weave 21 areas here was immediately clear. But I kind of clearly wrote to youthat it has nothing to do with the content of the phrase about attrition in the 80s. Here is a chronology of questions and answers between you and Far B:

                        1. I am not interested in the ratings of Nobody. Nobody has for the right to them either authority, or knowledge, or skill. The telegraph post has even more of them. yes

                        2.Has a direct relation - read already TWO times the 1st and last comments
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        Your conversation was about Russia as a whole. But when you got dunked again into your liesto you I had to twist and weave 21 areas.


                        LIE again, poke your nose again .: here is the BASIS and the BEGINNING of a conversation, where IMMEDIATELY mentioned all (my comment is FIRST):

                        yes no, author: Russia was one of the first large countries in which the birth rate fell below the level of simple generational replacement. This happened in 1964, // www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2006/0267/tema03.php.

                        And by 1990, already a THIRD of the population of Russia in 21 regions lived in conditions when the number of deaths exceeded the number of births... And this is the result of the PREVIOUS pre-perestroika.

                        Your nose hasn't turned into a potato yet? Already a puddle and a bunch of pity ... lol
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        In Russia, in some 21 regions, there were more deaths in a certain limited period, which means that

                        it means that again a disaster with your nose lol : if in 1987 there was an extinction in THREE regions, then after only three unfortunate years, already in TWENTY ONE region went extinct, those. the build-up went avalanche.

                        a disgrace ....
                      2. Foul skeptic
                        Foul skeptic April 22 2021 10: 34
                        -1
                        Learn what is "conversion" in Russian, ignorance.

                        What does the appeal have to do with it ?!
                        Learn the meaning of the word IGNORANCE
                        here is the BASIS and the BEGINNING of a conversation, where everything is IMMEDIATELY mentioned

                        What is the basis of the conversation ?! If your interlocutor from this conversation asks a SPECIFIC thing, he asks a question about a SPECIFIC paragraph of your text ?!
                        Quote: Far In
                        fertility has dropped below the level of simple generational replacement. It happened in 1964
                        However, you got it with your lies. Here are the figures below, with a link to the same demoscope. Where is the natural decline ??? 1964 is 19 years after the war, then the veterans were still leaving their wounds with might and main, nevertheless the population grew!
                        In the USSR:
                        year 1959 the number of Russians - 114 113 579 increase (%) + 14,58%
                        In the RSFSR:
                        year 1959 the number of Russians - 97 863 579 + 8,37%

                        In the USSR:
                        year 1970 the number of Russians - 129 015 140 increase (%) + 13,06%
                        In the RSFSR:
                        year 1970 the number of Russians - 107 747 630 increase (%) + 10,10%


                        And you, in your further answer to Dalniy V to this text of his, where he clearly shows the subject of the conversation (RSFSR) DO NOT REMEMBER about 21 areas.
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        Quote: Dalny V
                        However, you got it with your lies. Here are the figures below, with a link to the same demoscope. Where is the natural decline ??? 1964 is 19 years after the war, then the veterans were still leaving their wounds with might and main, nevertheless the population grew!

                        you got it with your dense IGNORANCE: there was no decline yet, and extinction has already started-for fertility has dropped below the level of simple generational replacement. , the population is rapidly AGING, there are few young people, there is no one to give birth to - which led to a LEGAL decline already in the 1980s

                        Why don't you mention it? This is the "basis of the conversation" lol tongue
                        Yes, because you were dunked into your lie LATER and then you had to get out. And up to this point, your "basic conversation" was not mentioned in the responses to Dalny V. wassat
                        if in 1987 there was an extinction in THREE regions, then in just three unfortunate years - already in TWENTY ONE region there was an extinction, i.e. the build-up went like an avalanche

                        Will there be any proof of your words? I missed something where in your answer are the NAMES OF AREAS. Let's be specific.
                        Once again, if you don't understand by ear, take the counting sticks and carry out some simple counting operations.
                        If, WITH A GENERAL INCREASE in the population in Russia, in some 21 regions there were more deaths in a certain limited period, this means that in the remaining 68 admin units the births turned out to be much HIGHER than the number of deaths than the national average.

                        Your Demoscope
                        In general, the entire period from the late 1960s to the late 1980s, in terms of the dynamics of the birth rate of a conventional generation, was more favorable in Russia than in most European countries, the United States or Japan.

                        Everything was normal, the country was gradually smoothing out the demographic consequences of the war, the 80s was the second peak of smoothing out, the third would fall in the mid-90s, since the generation of girls who would give birth in the mid-90s was larger than the previous generation. Thank the restructuring that derailed everything.
                      3. Olgovich
                        Olgovich April 22 2021 12: 24
                        -2
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        What does the appeal have to do with it ?!
                        Learn the meaning of the word IGNORANCE

                        Appeal to YOU, ignorance.

                        In Russian, the function the address is used a noun in the nominative case: see above.

                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        What is the basis of the conversation ?! If your interlocutor from this conversation asks a SPECIFIC thing, he asks a question about a SPECIFIC paragraph of your text ?!

                        My message is FIRST and this SPECIFIC thing is indicated there
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        And you, in your further answer to Dalniy V to this text of his, where he clearly shows the subject of the conversation (RSFSR) DO NOT REMEMBER about 21 areas.

                        Why don't you mention it?

                        it is necessary for the mentally disabled AGAIN to repeat several times already once said above. yes ... But for normal people, no.

                        Those. you LIE again, saying that,
                        you had to twist and weave 21 areas.
                        , for 21 regions are declared IMMEDIATELY, in the first post.

                        The question is why are you all the time lying making idle chatter?
                        you have nothing else to do?

                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        Will there be any proof of your words? ...

                        "Bulletin of statistics", 1991 And I don't have to prove anything to you.

                        Don't like it, go for a walk.
                        I missed something where in your answer are the NAMES OF AREAS. Let's specifics
                        And, come on, go, and - learn AZAM yourself?
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        Once again, if you don't understand by ear, take the counting sticks and carry out some simple counting operations.

                        take lollipop and try to comprehend again read yes
                      4. Foul skeptic
                        Foul skeptic April 22 2021 13: 14
                        -1
                        In Russian, a noun in the nominative case is used in the function of address

                        LEARN meaning of the word "IGNORANCE"
                        My message is FIRST and this SPECIFIC thing is indicated there

                        So what?! You were NOT asked about her. And about ANOTHER. And you answered ANOTHER. And twenty one areas answering this ANOTHER NOT mentioned. The chronology and content of the messages is given to you above. Of course, I understand that since the Durka was turned on, then do not turn it off. But it looks funny.
                        for 21 regions are declared IMMEDIATELY, in the first post.

                        And then what about 21 areas is written in the first sentence, if you did NOT operate with these lines, answering Far B ?! Show me WHERE the 21 areas are mentioned in your ANSWER to Far B? No? What then are we talking about?
                        "Bulletin of statistics", 1991

                        Room? Link? Or explain to you how the sources of information are presented?
                        And you cannot give the number for the simple reason that you yourself have not seen this "Bulletin of statistics", right? laughing tongue
                        Oh, come on

                        Let's name the areas. It is elementary to do this, but you do not do it because you are NOT interested in learning anything, all your actions are limited only to sketches on the fan.
                        try again to comprehend what you read

                        belay I don’t need to make sense of THIS
                        If, WITH A GENERAL INCREASE in the population in Russia, in some 21 regions there were more deaths in a certain limited period, this means that in the remaining 68 admin units the births turned out to be much HIGHER than the number of deaths than the national average.

                        Since this MY Think. Do you have any idea why the words "thought" and "comprehend" are cognate? It is YOU that needs to think about what is written.
                        If it doesn't work, ask me, I will explain.
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        Your Demoscope
                        In general, the entire period from the late 1960s to the late 1980s, in terms of the dynamics of the birth rate of a conventional generation, was more favorable in Russia than in most European countries, the United States or Japan.

                        What do you say to THIS? How will you dodge here to expose the country where you were born in black?
                      5. Olgovich
                        Olgovich April 22 2021 14: 11
                        -2
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic

                        LEARN THE MEANING OF IGNORANCE

                        LEARN what conversion is. And how to name someone is none of your business.
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        So what?! You were NOT asked about her. And about ANOTHER. And you answered ANOTHER. And twenty one areas answering this ANOTHER NOT mentioned. The chronology and content of the messages is given to you above. Of course, I understand that since the Durka was turned on, then do not turn it off. But it looks funny.

                        I IMMEDIATELY provided information, not then how you brazenly lie.

                        you look pitiful and ridiculous now, spinning like on a comb lol
                        disgrace ...
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        sentence, if you did NOT operate with these lines, answering Far B ?!

                        I operated them IMMEDIATELY, even before the question and heand were already known .

                        For you, of course, you need to repeat one hundred percent lol to get it, but normal people don't yes
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        Room? Link? Or explain to you how are submitted information sources?
                        And you cannot give the number for the simple reason that you yourself have not seen this "Bulletin of statistics", right?

                        and why are you so excited? lol № 7.

                        And no one should give you anything.

                        "YOURSELF, YOURSELF!" (C) lol
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        Let's name the areas. It's easy to do

                        you have already been sent -For knowledge, and you are all zharebetnichaet, strive to climb on someone else's neck.

                        It should be a shame.

                        Although who am I talking to ..

                        Go to the library and find out. Although anyone who is interested knows about SZR, TsR, TsCHR with a few exceptions
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        more births, this means that in the remaining 68 admin units, births were significantly HIGHER than the number of deaths than the national average.

                        Since this is MY THOUGHT.

                        ridiculous - against the backdrop of a CATASTROPHE arranged by your criminals in relation to the people of Russia, who brought him before extinction.
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        Your Demoscope
                        In general, the entire period from the late 1960s to the late 1980s, in terms of the dynamics of the birth rate of a conventional generation, was more favorable in Russia than in most European countries, the United States or Japan.

                        In the 1960s, Russia found itself at the forefront of the European movement to reduce fertility,

                        demoscope: total fertility rate in 1964 ceased to provide a simple replacement of generations for the entire population of Russia, the net reproduction rate dropped below one.

                        The country has entered a period of latent depopulation, and this can be considered the beginning of the first stage of the modern demographic crisis in Russia. During this phase, which lasted until 1992, only once, in 1986-1988, apparently under the influence of measures of demographic policy of the 80s, anti-alcohol campaign, and possibly optimistic social expectations of the first years of "perestroika", the net reproduction rate again exceeded the generation replacement threshold, but this increase was short-lived and gave way to another sharp drop.

                        2.I don't care about the birth rate of European countries (previously much lessthan in Russia), I see crime your boobies leading to indicators ... damn capitalists - under the screeching 70-year-old deceitful OR about "achievements"

                        burn yourself with a hot iron-
                        not a single generation of Russiansborn after 1910 and entering an active reproductive age, starting from the era of the "great turning point", the late 1920s - early 1930s, did not reproduce itself.
                      6. Foul skeptic
                        Foul skeptic April 22 2021 16: 11
                        -1
                        LEARN what conversion is. And how to name someone is none of your business.

                        lol Well, of course, this is not your illiteracy, but creativity
                        I IMMEDIATELY gave the information, and not later, as you brazenly lie.

                        1) show me where I lie, slanderer? A copy of my text and an explanation of what exactly the lie is.
                        I operated them IMMEDIATELY, even before the question and they were already known

                        2) Dalny In you asked about 21 regions or about the RSFSR / Russia?
                        № 7

                        Did you miss a word about link? Please, please, where did you get acquainted with the contents of this number on the Internet? Or would you say that you have it on paper? This magazine is simply referenced in any article from where you get the substance for the sketches. You haven't seen the magazine itself.
                        Although anyone who is interested knows about SZR, TsR, TsCHR with a few exceptions

                        3) Name specific areas
                        In the 1960s, Russia was at the forefront of the European movement to reduce the birth rate

                        4) And at 70?
                        5) What generations entered the childbearing period in the 60s?
                        in 1964, the total fertility rate ceased to provide a simple replacement of generations for the entire population of Russia, the net reproduction rate dropped below one

                        6) What generations entered the childbearing period in the 60s?
                        7) Is the net coefficient, like other demographic coefficients, constant, variable, cyclical, variable in nature?
                        During this stage, which lasted until 1992, only once, in 1986-1988, apparently under the influence of measures of demographic policy of the 80s, anti-alcohol campaign, maybe and optimistic social expectations of the first years of "perestroika"

                        No, since the birth rate has been growing since the beginning of the 70s, when no one "dreamed" about any perestroika
                        this increase turned out to be short-lived and was replaced by a new sharp drop

                        8) Did the sharp drop occur at a time when perestroika was going on?
                        I do not care about the birth rate of European countries (previously much lower than in Russia)

                        It does not matter that in absolute numbers, the birth rate in Europe is lower, since we are talking about POSITIVE DYNAMICS, and this indicator is not calculated in absolute values.
                        9) If the demographic dynamics in an industrialized country is better than in a number of industrialized countries that have gone through the second demographic transition, does this mean that this country has created better conditions for people?
                        not a single generation of Russians born after the 1910 year and having entered an active reproductive age, starting from the era of the “great turning point”, the end of the 1920's and the beginning of the 1930's, did not reproduce itself.

                        10) Did the subsequent generations of the French reproduce the previous ones?
                        11) Did the subsequent generations of the Germans reproduce the previous ones?
                        12) Did the subsequent generations of the English reproduce the previous ones?
                        13) Did the subsequent generations of Austrians reproduce the previous ones?
                        14) Did the subsequent generations of the Swedes reproduce the previous ones?
                        etc. for the rest of Europe.
                      7. Olgovich
                        Olgovich April 23 2021 10: 10
                        -1
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        Well, of course, this is not your illiteracy, but creativity

                        this is Russian, ignorance yes
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        show me where I lie, slanderer? A copy of my text and an explanation of what exactly the lie is.

                        shown to you already... Repeat again ?! Are you out of your mind?
                        Last time on, liar:
                        Quote: A vile skeptic
                        when you once again, you had to get out and weave 21 areas

                        And the regions were declared BEFORE "when".

                        Once again, I ask, why are you lying, clowning, grimacing all the time?
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        Did you miss a word about link? ...

                        The link is given: this is No. 7 of the Bulletin of Statistics.
                        Please, please, where did you get acquainted with the contents of this number on the Internet?


                        Learn what a "link" is - and it is not a network address, ignorance
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        Name specific areas

                        Repeat again ?! fool
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        If in an industrial country the demographic dynamics are better than in a number of industrial countries that have passed the second demographic transition, does this mean that this country has created better conditions for people?

                        in Russia, the birth rate was MUCH higher than in Europe. Up to you.

                        And you are bragging about the pitiful remnants of the past. No shame, no conscience.

                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        10) Did the subsequent generations of the French reproduce the previous ones?

                        you have forgotten that your stupid shameless liars, choking, squealed that in the blessed country, people, from the fallen happiness, bred like rabbits, in contrast to damned capitalism.

                        And left dying, old, weak, drunk people over vast territoriesrunning wild and empty... The killers.
                      8. Foul skeptic
                        Foul skeptic April 23 2021 11: 15
                        -1
                        this is Russian, ignorance

                        1) Does the correct construction of sentences in Russian involve the use of words without taking into account their semantics?
                        Quote: A vile skeptic
                        when you once again, you had to twist and weave 21 areas
                        And the areas were declared BEFORE "when"

                        2) Dalny In you asked about 21 regions or about the RSFSR / Russia?
                        Learn what a "link" is - and it is not a network address

                        I am very familiar with GOST R 7.0.5-2008. Section 10 will explain everything to you.
                        3) Have you studied the specified issue of the magazine on the net? My request is very clear about specifying not only the source of information, but also its location.
                        Repeat again ?!

                        4) Were you asked to indicate an oblast or district?
                        5) In the administrative division, how is the region different from the district?
                        6) Do you understand this difference if, in response to a request for the names of regions, you give abbreviations of regions?
                        7) Name specific areas?
                        the birth rate in Russia was MUCH higher than in Europe.

                        8) Is the high birth rate a sign of a developed industrial country that has completed the second democratic transition or an agrarian one that has not completed the second democratic transition?
                        9) If the demographic dynamics in an industrialized country is better than in a number of industrialized countries that have gone through the second demographic transition, does this mean that this country has created better conditions for people?
                        choking, they screamed that in the blessed people's country people, from the fallen happiness, bred, supposedly like rabbits, in contrast to the accursed capitalism.

                        10) Provide a quote confirming your words with a reference to its source (including network)
                        11) Did the subsequent generations of the French reproduce the previous ones?
                        12) Did the subsequent generations of the Germans reproduce the previous ones?
                        13) Did the subsequent generations of the English reproduce the previous ones?
                        14) Did the subsequent generations of Austrians reproduce the previous ones?
                        15) Did the subsequent generations of the Swedes reproduce the previous ones?
                        etc. for the rest of Europe.
                        You "missed" the questions:
                        16) And in the 70s?
                        17) What generations entered the childbearing period in the 60s?
                        18) Is the net coefficient, like other demographic coefficients, constant, variable, cyclical, variable in nature?
                        19) Did the sharp drop occur at a time when perestroika was going on?
                      9. Olgovich
                        Olgovich April 23 2021 12: 13
                        0
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        1) Does the correct construction of sentences in Russian involve the use of words without taking into account their semantics?

                        Nobody speculates about literacy.

                        do not forget.
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        2) Dalny In you asked about 21 regions or about the RSFSR / Russia?

                        none of your business.

                        answer for your FALSE:
                        Quote: A vile skeptic
                        when you once again, you had to twist and weave 21 areas

                        And the regions were declared BEFORE "when".

                        Once again, I ask, why are you lying, clowning, grimacing all the time?
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        I am very familiar with GOST R 7.0.5-2008. Section 10 will explain everything to you.

                        I explain to ignorance: The composition of the link should contain "A set of bibliographic information that provides identification and search for the reference object.".

                        you have been given this information. March to the library! lol
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        Have you studied the specified issue of the magazine on the net? My request is very clear about specifying not only the source of information, but also its location.

                        I don't care about your requests. be on them.
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        Were you asked to indicate an oblast or district?
                        5) In the administrative division, how is the region different from the district?
                        6) Do you understand this difference if, in response to a request for the names of regions, you give abbreviations of regions?
                        7) Name specific areas?

                        me to your questions.

                        everything that I thought it necessary to say, said and indicated, is confirmed by links.

                        your lack of understanding, ignorance and unwillingness to find out or even get on the neck of another for knowledge is the least that interests me
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        8) the fact that in this country there are better conditions for people?

                        You have already been answered: the birth rate in Russia was MUCH higher than in Europe. BEFORE you.

                        And you are boasting ... pitiful remnants of the past, NOT YOURS. No shame, no conscience.

                        Read one hundred times, since it didn’t come.
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        Provide a quote that confirms your words with a reference to its source (including network)

                        a thousand times given by all- the population began to multiply much faster than in the old days.
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        You "missed" the questions


                        the answer is given, didn’t get it ?:
                        your stupid, shameless liars, choking, squealed that in the blessed country of the country, from the fallen happiness, they bred, supposedly like rabbits, in contrast to the accursed capitalism.

                        А they left a dying, old, weak, drunken people on vast territories, wild and empty.
                        The killers.


                        PS is tired of repeating the same thing to you several times: the TV post is clearer.

                        therefore go-go: for knowledge. You are not interesting for me,

                        All on this yes
                      10. Foul skeptic
                        Foul skeptic April 23 2021 14: 12
                        0
                        I explain to ignorance: The composition of the link should contain "A set of bibliographic information that provides identification and search for the object of the link"

                        1) Is this your first time using this GOST?
                        2) If the answer to question # 1 is "Yes" and you have discovered this GOST for the first time in your life, does this allow you to think that you understand it?
                        You have given a line from the GENERAL provisions, which are supplemented by SPECIAL cases in the subsequent chapters, in our case it is chapter 10. If you refer to a document that you found on the network, then according to the rules you must indicate the site where you got this document. By analogy with how the source is indicated, taken from the archive is not just the name of the document, but the archive path. A specific example from GOST:
                        65. Avilova L.I. The development of metal production in the era of early metal (Eneolithic - Late Bronze Age) [Electronic resource]: state of the problem and research prospects // Vestn. RFBR. 1997. N 2. URL: http://www.rfbr.ru/pics/22394ref/file.pdf

                        I hope my friendly explanation will be useful to you and you will no longer make such oversights, I am always glad to share my experience and knowledge.
                        Therefore, I asked you and I ask you:
                        3) Have you studied the specified issue of the magazine on the net?
                        You have already been answered: the birth rate in Russia was MUCH higher than in Europe.

                        4) You were asked the question "was the birth rate in Russia much higher than in Europe" or another?
                        So I will repeat it:
                        5) If the demographic dynamics in an industrialized country is better than in a number of industrialized countries that have gone through the second demographic transition, does this mean that this country has created better conditions for people?
                        a thousand times given by all - the population began to multiply much faster than in the old days.

                        Matters in dialogue Here and now not that "a thousand times have been cited by all," but what is given Here and now.
                        6) What do the statements of the 30s have to do with the conversation about the demographic situation of the 60s and 80s?
                        7) Are the actual words identical in content and presentation - "the population began to multiply much faster than in the old days" with those you declared?
                        choking, they screamed that in the blessed country of the country people, from the fallen happiness, bred, ostensibly like rabbits, in contrast to the accursed capitalism.

                        the answer is given

                        The answers are not given, one part of the questions is generally ignored, for the second part of the questions you write what you please, and not what you are asked about.
                        In this regard, I am forced to repeat the questions again and ask you to answer them:
                        8) Does the correct construction of sentences in Russian involve the use of words without taking into account their semantics?
                        9) Dalny In you asked about 21 regions or about the RSFSR / Russia?
                        10) Were you asked to indicate an oblast or district?
                        11) In the administrative division, how is the region different from the district?
                        12) Do you understand this difference if, in response to a request for the names of regions, you give abbreviations of regions?
                        13) Name specific areas?
                        14) Is the high birth rate a sign of a developed industrial country that has completed the second democratic transition or an agrarian one that has not completed the second democratic transition?
                        15) Did the subsequent generations of the French reproduce the previous ones?
                        16) Did the subsequent generations of the Germans reproduce the previous ones?
                        17) Did the subsequent generations of the English reproduce the previous ones?
                        18) Did the subsequent generations of Austrians reproduce the previous ones?
                        19) Did the subsequent generations of the Swedes reproduce the previous ones?
                        20) And in the 70s?
                        21) What generations entered the childbearing period in the 60s?
                        22) Is the net coefficient, like other demographic coefficients, constant, variable, cyclical, variable in nature?
                        23) Did the sharp drop occur at a time when perestroika was going on?
                        For your convenience, I have tried to structure the questions in such a way that most of them can be answered with a simple "yes" or "no" or in a similar monosyllabic key.
                        I'm not asking you these questions because
                        your lack of understanding, ignorance and unwillingness to learn or even get on the neck of another for knowledge

                        but because conducting a discussion in the "question-answer" format (and not spreading thoughts along a tree) will lead to a situation where the erroneousness of your conclusions will be revealed. I can assume that I do not receive answers to the questions due to the fact that you, too, understand this.
  • Foul skeptic
    Foul skeptic April 21 2021 13: 50
    +4
    which led to the LEGAL declines already in the 1980s Years

    The 80s are 10 years old. Tell me, in which year out of these 10 years of the 80s, the population of Russia turned out to be less than the population of Russia in the previous year, which can be considered a decrease in population? You have completely lost your conscience, lie even where you can easily check you.
    1. Olgovich
      Olgovich April 21 2021 14: 19
      -8
      Quote: Nefarious skeptic
      The 80s are 10 years old. Tell me, in which year out of these 10 years of the 80s, the population of Russia turned out to be less than the population of Russia in the previous year, which can be considered a decrease in population? You have completely lost your conscience, lie even where you can easily check you.

      fool
      you have already pulled up with your impenetrable incomprehensibility ...

      Read the first and the following comment a hundred times already - and then it will come!
      1. Foul skeptic
        Foul skeptic April 21 2021 14: 23
        +2
        Especially for the passable teachable:
        Extinction has already begun- either the birth rate has dropped below the level of simple generational replacement. , the population is rapidly AGING, there are few young people, there is no one to give birth which led to a REGULAR decline already in the 1980s

        You wrote that in the 80s the population had already begun to decline. So confirm your words that the population of Russia is decreasing in the 80s.
  • Foul skeptic
    Foul skeptic April 21 2021 16: 30
    +3
    Providing such links is as if not out of a big mind at all.

    Oooh, it happens there. For example, from one article:
    In general, the entire period from the late 1960s to the late 1980s, in terms of the dynamics of the birth rate of a conventional generation, was more favorable in Russia than in most European countries, the United States or Japan.

    Do you think this is good? And I thought. But no, Demoscope will tell you what is not good, since the USSR, Mordor:
    the general stagnant atmosphere in the USSR of that period simply slowed down the evolution of pro-creative behavior of the population, which was going on in other countries

    repeat
    This is how we lived in the USSR, inhibited, and in the 90s we sharply evolved.
  • Foul skeptic
    Foul skeptic April 21 2021 09: 24
    +3
    Russia was one of the first large countries in which the birth rate fell below the level of simple generational replacement. It happened in 1964

    laughing nevertheless, it was necessary to make adjustments to the previous "facts" when it was proved to everyone that in Russia the net coefficient was the first to fall below one? And here already - from the "big" countries. No, but progress)))
    The demoscope, in its repertoire, presents information in such a way that it would be difficult to double-check. This is me about their schedule from your link. It is very interesting to analyze it, although the authors tried to complicate this process as much as possible)) What interesting could happen in an unidentified country on this graph, that in 65 the net coefficient is 0,95, and in 66 - 1,65? How is this possible? ))) By the way, you here recently expressed your attitude to the "grant suckers" ... How do you feel about Demoscope? lol
    1. Olgovich
      Olgovich April 21 2021 10: 51
      -9
      Quote: Nefarious skeptic
      nevertheless, it was necessary to make adjustments to the previous "facts", when it was proved to everyone that the net coefficient in Russia was the first to drop below one? And here already - from the "big" countries.

      it was written and meant always,: it just rarely reaches you that in time ... fool lol
      Quote: Nefarious skeptic
      His

      and you try to refute, ignorant.
      1. Foul skeptic
        Foul skeptic April 21 2021 12: 05
        +5
        it was always written and meant

        laughing
        Olgovich in the topic "Why the Soviet Union died" dated 04.12.2018/XNUMX/XNUMX (the author's style is preserved):
        Quote: Olgovich

        And the USSR - the FIRST in Europe came to depopulation

        Olgovich in the topic "Stalin's fierce struggle with his comrades-in-arms for power in the crucial 20s" dated 02.02.2021 (the author's style is preserved):
        Quote: Olgovich
        USSR - the FIRST country in Europe, which came to depopulation (1964)

        Tell us where you wrote about other "large" countries here? tongue
        But you were told both about Hungary and about Romania (they did not talk about Japan, since you narrowed it down to Europe), and you, who told you this, called names in every possible way. Don't want to apologize to people?
        By the way, you were answered there:
        La révolution démographique. Études et essais sur les problèmes de la Population (translated by E. Petukhova):
        According to Kuchinsky, 1000 girls born in France in 1926 should have given birth to 937 daughters. This year, the net replacement rate was 0,89 in Germany, 0,86 in England, and 0,93 on average for Western and Northern Europe. In Austria in 1928 the net reproduction rate was at around 0,782, in Sweden in 1930 - at around 0,858.
        Although all of these countries still have more births than deaths - due to the age structure shaped by previous demographic trends that explains this anomaly - these countries are already depopulated.

        This is about who was the first in Europe.
        and you try to refute

        So the author of the article did everything possible to prevent this from happening - it is simply impossible to unambiguously identify any country on the graph, except for Russia. request
        So how can you explain your commitment to Demoscope in the context of your recent attacks on the "grant sucker"? wassat tongue
        1. Olgovich
          Olgovich April 21 2021 12: 23
          -7
          [
          Quote: Nefarious skeptic
          Olgovich in the topic "Stalin's fierce struggle with comrades-in-arms for power in the turning 20s" dated 02.02.2021

          Maladets! yes

          Diligently outline my work. You should still understand what you are reading, but here, alas ... fool .

          read TEN times, once it does not come from the first ... yes

          Quote: Nefarious skeptic
          So the author of the article did everything possible to prevent this from happening - it is simply impossible to unambiguously identify any country on the graph, except for Russia.

          you just don't .. lol... you can lol
          Quote: Nefarious skeptic
          Since, nevertheless, to explain your commitment to Demoscope

          each figure is justified.

          You have complete a ...
  • Maks1995
    Maks1995 April 21 2021 09: 30
    -2
    Too short. But it’s true.
  • comradChe
    comradChe April 21 2021 10: 31
    -3
    Bravo Alexander, hit the spot. EVERYTHING is exactly like that. REVANCE in the broadest sense.
  • iouris
    iouris April 21 2021 13: 31
    -1
    As a result, the plan was implemented. "Have a whole."
  • yehat2
    yehat2 April 22 2021 11: 37
    0
    Samsonov attributes this destruction to some external forces
    but destroy only their own - now in order to build
    "Russia, which we have lost" of Nikolay's model2, when in Germany and England almost 100% of the population received primary education, and in RI, for the most part, it was forbidden to study.
    (the law on cook's children and others) and the nobility was full of fat
  • Givi Jalagoniya
    Givi Jalagoniya April 25 2021 12: 28
    0
    Hitler was afraid of the Pan-Slavic Reich, which did not exist. It's a pity that he was not ...
    The Pan-Slavic Reich is not even the Fourth Reich, which the son of the Stalinist People's Commissar of the aviation industry dreamed about in 1940, while still a schoolboy. This is a full-fledged antithesis to the Pan-German Reich, which at least they tried to create like Himmler.