"We do not know about any state of Taiwan": data of radio exchange between the ships of the Chinese and Taiwanese naval forces appeared

86

Published data on the "meeting" of ships of the naval forces of China (PRC) and Taiwan (Republic of China) in the waters of the East China Sea. The reports say that the Taiwanese missile frigate Chi Kuan (PFG2-1105) tried to obstruct the passage of the PLA anti-submarine corvette Shuozhou (610) - Type 056A. Radio data are also given.

The crew of the Taiwanese warship used a special frequency of 156,8 MHz to get in touch with the ship of the Chinese Navy, through which a distress signal is usually transmitted, as well as a danger signal.



The radio operator of the Taiwanese frigate "Chi Kuan":

Shuozhou. Shouzhou. Right ahead of you is the frigate of the naval forces of the Republic of China PFG2-1105. Stop approaching the 24 mile zone. Please change course and leave immediately!

In response, the PLA naval warship answered that "no naval forces of the Republic of China of Taiwan exist, just as the Republic of China itself does not exist."

From the answer:

There is the naval forces of the People's Republic of China. We are not aware of any of the Republic of China and the state of Taiwan. This is part of the PRC. We are in these waters on the basis of the PRC legislation. You are breaking it. So go away.

This kind of radio exchange between the warships of the PRC and Taiwan took place north of the island. At the same time in Taiwan they say that this kind of "incident" occurred at the end of March, without adding information about the final "meeting" of the two ships.

It should be added that after a while the same Chinese warship, accompanied by a "colleague" in the PLA Navy, appeared in the area of ​​the disputed Senkaku Islands (Diaoyu Dao). This was reported by Japanese sources, citing military data.

In Taiwan and Japan, these movements of Chinese warships have been called provocative.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    86 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +65
      April 14 2021 07: 46
      We have a similar situation. There is no separate state of Ukraine. There are criminally donated / given away territories of Russia. And there are still parts of other countries
      1. -54
        April 14 2021 07: 51
        And another investment matryoshka, there is no Donbass, this is part of Ukraine. According to the official position of the Russian Federation wassat
        1. +30
          April 14 2021 11: 00
          Matryoshka is exactly Ukraine. Crimea and Donbass have already taken out two composite "nesting dolls", and soon the rest will be taken out. There will only be a mention of an unsuccessful experiment to create a certain state of Seluk and Banderlog.
        2. +5
          April 14 2021 13: 15
          Part of the FORMER united Ukraine, which became sovereign after the coup in Kiev ...
      2. +12
        April 14 2021 07: 52
        Quote: Mitroha
        There are criminally donated / given away territories of Russia

        What was criminally donated has already returned "to its native harbor."
        But a separate state, yes ... it always belonged to someone, then the Poles, then Russia, now America ... absolutely no self-identity. )))
        1. +16
          April 14 2021 09: 45
          Quote: Canecat
          What was criminally donated has already returned "to its native harbor."

          Not all.
          1. +13
            April 14 2021 09: 54
            I look at the comments, the Sino-Taiwanese radio exchange between the ships caused a good resonance with regard to the belonging of Ukraine. laughing
        2. +7
          April 14 2021 17: 09
          The state "Ukraine" has never existed. These were the outskirts of Russia, Little Russia, to be more precise. And "Ukraine" is a 100-year-old anti-Russian project. A fiction that it's time to scatter to the wind.
      3. -4
        April 14 2021 07: 54
        Not just given away, but annexed from Russia by military means. See the terms of the 1918 Brest Peace Treaty.
        1. +15
          April 14 2021 08: 23
          See the terms of the 1918 Brest Peace Treaty.

          Sorry, but it was canceled in the Versailles Treaty of 1919. Article 116.
          1. +5
            April 14 2021 08: 32
            It does not matter anymore. Under this article, Germany recognized the INDEPENDENCE of these territories. That is, she did the main thing - she deprived them of Russia. And then the local nationalists worked. If it were not for the German offensive of 1918, there would be no Ukraine now. We would crush this separatism at the root. Moreover, the people themselves do not fucking need it.
            1. +1
              April 14 2021 08: 56
              Quote: Pavel73
              It does not matter anymore. Under this article, Germany recognized the INDEPENDENCE of these territories.

              Bolsheviks recognized the UPR and her right to complete separation eshche in the beginning of December 1917, then at the end of December 1917 he already recognized UKrajina People's Republic of Soviets ... The UPR declared complete independence.

              Those. recognized Ukraine existed BEFORE Brest.
              1. +6
                April 14 2021 09: 10
                From the fact that a handful of adventurers proclaimed a new state, and another handful of adventurers recognized it, it does not follow that it was actually formed. As long as the Russian army was on the territory of Ukraine, it was still possible to save. And only the offensive of the Germans led to the final separation of these primordially Russian lands from Russia. Yes, the Bolsheviks later added.
                1. +1
                  April 15 2021 12: 24
                  Final detachment is not a legal term. At the moment when Ukraine was (in your opinion) torn away from Russia, most of its present territories had not yet been transferred by Moscow to its structure. Does this bother you?
              2. +2
                April 14 2021 10: 48
                So they recognized that they had declared it illegal and began to fight for power lol
                The Bolsheviks did not recognize a specific UPR, but the People's Ukrainian Republic. Can't you see the difference?
                And the manifesto clearly states that we recognize the right of Ukrainians to their state, where the power is not with the Rada, but with the Soviets.
                1. +4
                  April 14 2021 17: 13
                  Well, you can also recognize the "people's Ukrainian republic" within the borders of 1918, let everything else be returned to Russia. After that, "Ukraine" will have nothing left but heaps of manure on the site of the once flourishing Soviet collective and state farms. And they will not get to the sea, and they will not get anywhere, since "Ukraine" will turn out to be some kind of fly on the map of Russia.
            2. +7
              April 14 2021 08: 59
              Taiwan has not been recognized by any major state. Neither the United States nor the countries of Europe (except for the Vatican) ... 19 countries, mainly small island states, are recognized. So the attempts of the United States and their bedding to sell something from arms to Taiwan is a gross interference in the internal affairs of the PRC. Moreover, what officially the Taiwan authorities did not declare independence. That is, today, neither China nor Taiwan consider their relations as foreign. They prefer to use the term “cross-strait relations” in relation to their geographical delimiter, the Taiwan Strait.
              1. +1
                April 14 2021 09: 42
                until 1971, the Republic of China was a member of the UN and a member of the Security Council.
                replacement with the PRC became possible because the United States and their litters decided that it was
                in their interest.
              2. +2
                April 14 2021 09: 44
                Taiwan has not been recognized by any major state. Neither the USA nor the countries of Europe

                Well, with the recognition here it is very conditional. The United States and France, for example, sell to Taiwan (as an independent state) combat armored vehicles, aircraft and ships.
              3. -5
                April 14 2021 13: 27
                All this is quite controversial. Relations with Taiwan are independent of the PRC.
            3. +3
              April 14 2021 09: 41
              Under this article, Germany recognized the INDEPENDENCE of these territories.

              She recognized their independence from Germany.
              It had nothing to do with the national structure of the USSR that emerged in 1922.
      4. 0
        April 14 2021 09: 20
        Not similar. RF officially recognizes Ukraine.
      5. 0
        April 14 2021 09: 48
        Quote: Mitroha
        We have a similar situation

        we have nothing similar
        Taiwan has NEVER been part of modern China.
        This is the heir to the Kuomintang state, who fled there after being defeated by the communists.
        And I don't really understand the intensity of aggression and claims that mainland China is demonstrating.
        It's the same with Hong Kong. It has never officially been part of modern China, but at least there are more reasons for unification there.
        In addition, Taiwan (formerly Formosa) was actually recaptured by the Kuomintang from the Japanese, and not at all by the communists, who spent the entire war in the mountains while the Kuomintang fought the Japanese and lost soldiers.
        Modern China, as a state, has many advantages, but the way it was created and what it went through later is a very murky and far from always attractive picture.
        1. +6
          April 14 2021 13: 14
          What difference does it make) who is strong is right! And then history and pieces of paper can be corrected, under all this civilized veneer, a person remained the same as he was 1000 years ago) there is an opportunity to snatch a piece from a neighbor while he is weak, you have to tear it)
          The United States at one time chopped off half of Mexico, calling it the American-Mexican War, but in fact it was just the introduction of troops and the occupation of territories while the neighbor was moping hi
        2. -1
          April 15 2021 08: 13
          Quote: yehat2
          Taiwan has NEVER been part of modern China.


          But it was part of ancient China, in the 12th century it was included as part of the Fujian province (and since then, it is considered part of China, even taking into account the temporary occupation of Japan - Taiwan). And what right do the followers of the Kuomintang have to this territory, this is a good question ...
          1. 0
            April 15 2021 12: 34
            Taiwan is China, the Komi who seized the mainland have a very dubious relationship to it.
      6. -4
        April 14 2021 13: 15
        But how then did the Russian Federation sign an agreement on the observance of the territorial integrity of a nonexistent state?
        1. ANB
          0
          April 14 2021 17: 29
          ... But how then did the Russian Federation sign an agreement on the observance of the territorial integrity of a nonexistent state?

          When did you have time? Did I miss something?
          1. 0
            April 16 2021 02: 38
            Yes, they did.
      7. +2
        April 14 2021 16: 07
        Well, you can recognize Ukraine within the boundaries of the Zaporozhye Sich in 1654. And take the rest.
        1. 0
          April 15 2021 10: 23
          The Zaporizhzhya Sich was not considered a part of Little Russia. It was a special education.
      8. -1
        April 14 2021 21: 08
        The only problem is that the Russian Federation Samv recognized the independence of Ukraine. So the analogy is not correct.
    2. +5
      April 14 2021 07: 48
      Almost like Zadornov, an American aircraft carrier and a Spanish lighthouse on the island!
      1. -1
        April 14 2021 07: 57
        This joke of 1928 is from the birth of Christ. About the American lighthouse and Canadian fishing sailors. Alas.
        1. +1
          April 14 2021 09: 43
          Zadornov had everything in one piece.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +8
      April 14 2021 07: 54
      China will be able to finish what it started, assimilation, absorption of Taiwan, both the political structure and the economy, not tomorrow, then after tomorrow ...
      process and so WALKED !!! but then the impudent Saxon ... the instigator came and the muddy bogeyman began.
      1. -2
        April 14 2021 08: 14
        As a bae after the uprising of the communists against the legitimate government of China, which took refuge in Taiwan. From that moment until today, the United States has been defending Taiwan from the PRC.
        1. +8
          April 14 2021 08: 28
          how bae ... not sure that the United States will fit in for Taiwan in the event of a direct seizure ... so, they stink, they drive away Avik and ... all Yn showed what the Amerov's show-off is worth
          1. -2
            April 14 2021 08: 29
            If the PRC had confidence, it would have attacked long ago. He has a huge military group in full readiness standing opposite Taiwan.
            1. +3
              April 14 2021 08: 29
              UDC is being completed ..
              1. +8
                April 14 2021 08: 44
                Novel, hi
                Another psychological trick from China

                During the flight of PLA aircraft on April 10, 2021, in the airspace of the air defense identification zone of Taiwan, the aviation of the Republic of China tried three times to track the activities of the intruders.

                Over the radio, one of the PLA pilots replied to the Taiwanese aviator: "This is Chinese airspace, you will get used to it very soon."
                They troll Taiwanese almost every day. laughing
                1. 0
                  April 14 2021 08: 50
                  Why would China attack? Whoever can answer this question?
                  1. +4
                    April 14 2021 09: 10
                    Quote: rocket757
                    Why would China attack? Whoever can answer this question?

                    "In order for countries to buy weapons, they also need an excuse. And the best reason is this is the threat of another country's attack.
                    Here are the statistics for 2020. By country, the largest volume of agreements was in Taiwan ($ 11,777 billion), Poland ($ 4,71 billion), Morocco ($ 4,539 billion), UAE ($ 3,568 billion), India ($ 3,364 billion), South Korea ($ 2,124 billion), Japan ($ 1,983 billion), Australia ($ 1,718 billion), Singapore ($ 1,292 billion), Saudi Arabia ($ 1,175 billion), Afghanistan ($ 1,071 billion) and Israel ($ 1,058 billion). "
                    https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2021/03/25/o-ruzhe-kotoroe-dolzhno-strelyat-i-o-klondayke-dlya-ssha-i-nato
                    1. -1
                      April 14 2021 09: 15
                      China does not sell weapons to Taiwan .... why should China attack Taiwan.
                      By the way, the financial "garters" between them grew, until recently, very dynamically ...
                      1. 0
                        April 14 2021 09: 19
                        Quote: rocket757
                        China does not sell weapons to Taiwan

                        “Divide et impera” - strip and celebrate.
                        We are talking about contracts between the United States and Taiwan.
                        1. 0
                          April 14 2021 10: 28
                          So this minke whales are balaboling that China is going to attack Taiwan ...
                          China is acting differently .... it has plenty of time.
                          And to believe the podlosatik, it must be absolutely ... absolutely, in short, or you yourself want the same.
                  2. 0
                    April 14 2021 09: 13
                    Quote: rocket757
                    Why would China attack?

                    It's like with Karabakh ... For so many years talking Taiwan is China, moreover talking to the people and doing nothing. People won't understand.
                    But this does not mean that it will attack directly "tomorrow" ... China, knows how to wait. Hong Kong, they've been waiting for so many years. wink
                    1. 0
                      April 14 2021 09: 19
                      and tell the people, and do nothing
                      We are so sure that China DID NOT DO ANYTHING there ???
                    2. +2
                      April 14 2021 12: 02
                      Stas hi the fifth column is prepared, as it matures - so it will go
                      1. 0
                        April 14 2021 12: 30
                        Quote: novel xnumx
                        the fifth column is being prepared

                        Probably. Yes
                        Although I think there is already this case, everything is fine. "If you want to hide the tree, then hide it in the forest .." wink
                        I wouldn't be surprised if half of the Taiwanese army raises red flags and starts waving the Great Helmsman's quotes. laughing
                  3. 0
                    April 14 2021 10: 17
                    Quote: rocket757
                    Why would China attack? Whoever can answer this question?

                    as the card falls, in Taiwan there was and is a Kuomintang party which considers the existing division in Taiwan as temporary, which IMHO suited the Chinese at the very least, but there is still some kind of "democratic", supported by the United States, which is just like - Taiwan is not China, this turning stone is where the cart will fall and go.
                    1. -1
                      April 14 2021 10: 29
                      China, it seems, does not scatter pebbles ... very careful, purposeful guys !!! no hope at all.
                      1. 0
                        April 14 2021 10: 38
                        Quote: rocket757
                        China, it seems, does not scatter pebbles ... very careful, purposeful guys !!! no hope at all.

                        Duc that's reminiscent of the island's lack of sovereignty
                        1. 0
                          April 14 2021 10: 40
                          China drives strangers away from its ... common practice.
                        2. +2
                          April 14 2021 10: 42
                          Quote: rocket757
                          China drives strangers away from its ... common practice.

                          yes, that's right, such a kind of confederation of warring regimes, well, the United States in the role of a provocateur
                        3. 0
                          April 14 2021 10: 51
                          Southeast Asia is not the calmest region, just about the local problems, disagreements, they prefer to forget, for the time being.
                  4. +1
                    April 14 2021 18: 10
                    China considers Taiwan to be its territory
            2. +1
              April 14 2021 20: 08
              Quote: BlackMokona
              If the PRC had confidence, it would have attacked long ago. He has a huge military group in full readiness standing opposite Taiwan.


              China can invade Taiwan and there will be enough forces and no one can interfere.
              Only in this case there will be large losses in the PLA, losses among the local population of Taiwan, great destruction, a lot of stench from the west.
              Therefore, it is precisely the capture that China does not need.

              Most likely, the Chinese are aiming at a gradual peaceful takeover of the island due to their growing all-round domination.

              But the Anglo-Saxons got in with the militarization of Taiwan against China.

              China is more likely to be expected to introduce air and sea control over Taiwan, inspect cargo, etc.

              In this case, local clashes are possible if Taiwan tries to obstruct Chinese control.

              But that too could happen if Taiwan's militarization continues.

              And the capture is from the realm of fantasy.
        2. ANB
          0
          April 14 2021 17: 31
          ... against the legitimate government of China

          Legality is a tricky subject. Here she is, but she is no longer there.
          (c) Winnie the Pooh.
        3. 0
          April 15 2021 10: 24
          You can find fault with the Kuomintang too. They once also rebelled against the legitimate northern government and created their own in southern China. And then they began to take control of the territories. sometimes real, sometimes conventional, symbolic.
    5. +2
      April 14 2021 08: 01
      For some more time, the whole fleet will be off the coast of the island, and the island itself will return to its native harbor. You need to wait 5, maximum 10 years.
      1. +3
        April 14 2021 08: 29
        faster, they still have a couple of UDCs to build and you can start
      2. -6
        April 14 2021 10: 05
        Well yes. Taiwanese people dream of living in a totalitarian garbage dump with a poor salary and lack of social benefits, they can’t eat.
        1. +3
          April 14 2021 13: 24
          And where do you live, if not a secret of course? Well, to call a country with a top economy with such epithets.
          1. -2
            April 14 2021 13: 50
            Top economy = / = decent standard of living. In Taiwan, the standard of living is higher, there is a democratic government, there are human rights in the end. The people of Taiwan will never accept the PRC.
            1. -2
              April 14 2021 17: 24
              The question of the place of residence was ignored). Well then, those words are empty, as they described China). "Human rights"? There is no concept more ephemeral in the modern world than "human rights". China will definitely declare its rights, and then we will see who is against and how.
              1. -3
                April 14 2021 17: 27
                That is, if I live in an authoritarian CIS country with not the highest standard of living, then I cannot criticize the totalitarian garbage dump called China, where there is not even a full-fledged Internet? Let me decide for myself how I feel about this wonderful country.
                1. 0
                  April 14 2021 19: 42
                  When you express your opinion about a superpower, it is better to specify what you mean by the comfort of the life of an ordinary person.
                  A democratic government is neither a plus nor a minus, I ask you to take into account that not everyone loves democracy and many categorical attribution of a democratic government to the pluses hurts the eye (I am one of them).
                  Human rights cannot "act". This is just an opportunity, the realization of which or not remains at the discretion of the person.
                  And, apart from censorship and restrictions on religion, China is practically no different from Taiwan in terms of the scope of rights.
                  And freedom of speech, as well as religious freedom, is just 2 of a large list of freedoms.

                  Totalitarianism will put China at the top of the food chain. Totalitarianism allows China to be strong and, if desired, crush Taiwan with their standard of living like a cockroach. To live well is cool, but not cool that tomorrow a foreigner can come into your house, put his feet on the table, and your state will be powerless.
                2. -2
                  April 15 2021 07: 06
                  There are no authoritarian countries left in the CIS, after the collapse of the union, liberals came to power everywhere) Perhaps moderate, but Lyuberals. China is the first country to produce equipment for 5g Internet).
                  Think for yourself, decide for yourself whether to have a brain or not;)
    6. +5
      April 14 2021 08: 25
      Quote: BlackMokona
      As a bae after the uprising of the communists against the legitimate government of China, which took refuge in Taiwan.

      Less pathos and more knowledge of history. There was no legitimate Chinese government. there was a civil war in the country.
      1. -4
        April 14 2021 13: 31
        But Taiwan remained under this very republican government. The PRC did not actually own it.
    7. +1
      April 14 2021 08: 38
      Chinese diplomats and the military are good at expressing their thoughts.
      Recent events with America, Europe and Taiwan confirm this.
      Our Foreign Ministry should learn from the Chinese comrades, otherwise we are "expressing concern and concern" .....
      1. +3
        April 14 2021 08: 56
        In 2016, the volume of trade between the two shores of the Taiwan Strait amounted to $ 179,6 billion. Such data were published on Saturday by the Ministry of Commerce of the PRC.

        In 2016, the volume of exports from the mainland of China to Taiwan amounted to $ 40,37 billion, with a decrease of 10,1 percent, the volume of imports from the island - $ 139,23 billion (a decrease of 2,8 percent). Taiwan became the seventh largest trading partner in the interior of China and ranked sixth in terms of imports of goods to the interior.

        "Sea Confrontation" is a performance.

        One of the most highly developed factories in the world, what nafig military and conflicts ??. Billions are made here. The volume of trade between Taiwan and China is greater than that of Russia with the entire EU

        Capital of Taiwan - Taipei
      2. +4
        April 14 2021 08: 58
        Quote: prior
        Chinese diplomats and the military are good at expressing their thoughts.
        Recent events with America, Europe and Taiwan confirm this.
        Our Foreign Ministry should learn from the Chinese comrades, otherwise we are "expressing concern and concern" .....

        Black Sea (nowadays) a question from the Russian Navy: whose ship is on the traverse? answer: Donald Cook USA! Russian Navy - we do not know such a state! I would like to hear such a radio exchange wink
    8. The comment was deleted.
    9. +1
      April 14 2021 09: 24
      Quote: rocket757
      We are so sure that China DID NOT DO ANYTHING there ???

      Where? what
      Hong Kong or Taiwan?
    10. -2
      April 14 2021 09: 39
      Ekh, posmotet bi na epichniy artileriyski boy linii fregatov CN i TW i kto skoree uspeyet sdelat T. :)
    11. -1
      April 14 2021 09: 56
      The most interesting thing in the comments is that the article is about the meeting of two ships - Chinese and Taiwanese, and they began to talk about Ukraine on the fly. And the radio exchange is somewhat reminiscent of M. Zadornov's story about an American aircraft carrier and a Spanish lighthouse. The "American aircraft carrier" was a Taiwan ship.
      Right ahead of you is a frigate of the ROC naval forces ... change course and leave immediately!
    12. 0
      April 14 2021 10: 17
      A 300% duty will be introduced on Chinese goods in a dozen countries, and in six months the Chinese under the leadership of the CCP will again work in the rice fields and will not remember any Taiwan.
      1. 0
        April 14 2021 20: 12
        That dozen countries are likely right tomorrow after the announced measures will go to engage in slash-and-burn agriculture. Look at the stickers on half of your clothes ...
      2. +1
        April 14 2021 20: 18
        And at the same time, a dozen countries will remain without most of the equipment, textiles, household items, while all these goods will be bought at a discount by the other 140 countries.
        Oh yes, and this dozen countries will remain without production, which is in China, because China, in response to an economic war of such magnitude, nationalizes the property of companies resident in these 10 states.
        As soon as the flow of goods from China is interrupted, the cash flow from:
        - customs duties;
        - taxes on the sale of goods that fall under the sanctions, because there will be no more of them;
        - taxes on payment of jobs, because business will suffer greatly, unemployment will rise and the social burden will rise - you have to pay unemployment benefits, right?
        - future receipts of the "second wave" will decrease (the unemployed will not be able to buy so much, receipts from taxation of other goods and essential goods will decrease, because their sales volumes are insignificant, but they will also fall)
        - the standard of living will decrease, because demand will exceed supply, prices for analogues without government regulation will soar, the average buyer will be able to afford less.

        Not to mention the fact that he will refuse to pay compensation and recognize the decisions of international bodies on this issue, because this is the sovereignty trick.
    13. +3
      April 14 2021 11: 48
      Well done Chinese) immediately put all the dots above and) without any smearing with nozzles)
    14. 0
      April 14 2021 23: 12
      How familiar it is. We also have a "great sea power" at our side.
    15. 0
      April 15 2021 09: 31
      Quote: Pensive Lawyer
      And at the same time, a dozen countries will remain without most of the equipment, textiles, household items, while all these goods will be bought at a discount by the other 140 countries.
      Oh yes, and this dozen countries will remain without production, which is in China,

      Do not tell yourself that the other 140 states will buy Chinese goods at a discount, they will not become richer. And production from China is slowly being withdrawn, the cost of Chinese labor is growing by leaps and bounds. Beggars or for a one-time job, for example, buy a tool from China, knowing that they will fly by. Normal buy from Europe.
    16. 0
      April 15 2021 20: 21
      Well, how did it end? Drank tea and went home?
    17. -1
      April 15 2021 21: 00
      See, repent. After all, not only behind Taiwan is a superpower ready to kill for the island, but also Taiwan is legally legitimate. And the PRC are vile rebels who illegally seized power on the continent. Especially serious criminals who deserve only a fire.
    18. 0
      April 17 2021 19: 11
      The earth would dry up faster and .......

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"