Military Review

Behind the impudence of Western politicians lies an elementary fear and inability to solve serious problems

56
Behind the impudence of Western politicians lies an elementary fear and inability to solve serious problems

How many materials I have read about how arrogant and stupid the American, and after them the European politicians and generals, who demanded from Russia a report on the movement of troops on its territory. Who just didn’t get rid of this requirement. How many patriots proudly declared that Russia is not like that now and will not be accountable! How many liberals, on the contrary, explained to us the legitimacy of these demands and the validity of the West's fears.


At the same time, due to some coincidence, incomprehensible to me, no one had a question about the reason for such actions. Everything seems to be clear. Ukraine got scared and frightened its masters. The Russian bear slightly moved its shoulders in its den. But is it? I agree with the thesis that often some events have the simplest explanation. Maybe you shouldn't dig deeper here either?

Moreover, if you carefully read the first statement on this matter from the American State Department, you can see exactly this explanation of the requirements:

"The United States is concerned about any attempts by Moscow to intimidate Ukraine, wherever these attempts are carried out - on Russian territory or on the territory of Ukraine."

And now, after a lot of statements and the transfer of units, after Biden's swinish statement about President Putin, the United States slowly began to play back. The rhetoric changed, the American president began to change the plumage from a hawk to a dove, Washington remembered the telephone.

Russian troops in Donbass may disappear and appear suddenly


I will reveal very secret information from the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine. Seven battalion tactical groups disappeared in the Donbas in a year! The Russians have hidden somewhere 5,5-6 thousand servicemen! Last year, according to the Minister of Defense of Ukraine, there were 35 BTGs, and this year, according to the report of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense, there are 28 of them!

How are the intelligence data of the Armed Forces of Ukraine connected with the impudent demands of the West on Russia?

In order to understand this, it is enough to take another "work" of an ardent nationalist and specialist in military affairs, who remained a conscript for the rest of his life, Yuri Butusov. It was he, perhaps without suspecting it himself, who revealed the mechanism of creating the illusion of Russia's weakness among the Ukrainians and the West. To begin with, about Russian power:

“At the moment, the 150th Motorized Rifle Division of the Southern Military District, the 3rd Motorized Rifle Division of the Western Military District are deployed on the border with Ukraine, the 74th Motorized Rifle Brigade of the Central Military District is being transferred to Ukraine. In Crimea - the 126th coastal defense motorized rifle brigade, the 810th marine brigade and the 56th airborne assault brigade. These forces are a serious threat, but not sufficient for a deep offensive operation. "

It is clear that I again cite the data that are intended for domestic and Western use. It is necessary to show the strength of the Russian army. The author speaks of the million-strong army that the Russians have today. But right there, literally through a paragraph, new information appears:

“According to official data, now the total number of ground forces of the RF Armed Forces: ground forces - 280 thousand servicemen; airborne troops - 45 thousand troops; marines - up to 13 thousand troops. Among them are numerous non-combat units and formations, plus missilemen, anti-aircraft gunners, engineers, plus conscripts, plus personnel of training centers, arsenals, bases, etc. "

Confused by the numbers? Nothing. The main thing is to believe. And to know these numbers in the order in which they are indicated by the Ukrainian side and in which they are relayed to NATO headquarters and the Pentagon.

In 2014-2015, Russia has already "introduced" its troops to Donbass. And it was these troops, using the factor of surprise, that became the authors of the victories of the republican units and subdivisions during that period. Ukrainian intelligence, however, represented by "Infornapalm", counted as many as 39 Russian BTGs in Donbas. At that time, this was all that the Russian army could give at all. Therefore, they did not continue to attack the valiant ukrovoinov.

But today Ukraine needs help from NATO. Simply because the army of the northern neighbor has dramatically increased the number of BTGs in its composition. The danger was now real. And there is nothing that the Russian troops are located on a vast territory. Nothing that the Russian army "threatens" the Balts, Northern Europe, Poles. All these battalions are "intended" for an attack on Ukraine:

“On September 7, 2018, Chief of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces Valery Gerasimov assessed the combat readiness of the ground forces of the RF Armed Forces:

“Today the Land and Airborne Forces have 126 battalion tactical groups, staffed by contract soldiers and are in constant readiness to carry out combat missions. Mostly contract servicemen serve in combat units. "

And now for the Western military. In order for them to understand how strong and how defenseless the Ukrainian army is.

“However, Ukraine also has superiority in a number of critical components:

1. Motivation of servicemen who defend their homeland.

2. Availability of a large trained reserve with combat experience and active support of civil society.

3. The presence, albeit outdated, but numerous weapons systems. And also the production and supply of many thousands of anti-tank guided missiles "Stugna", "Korsar", "Javelin".

4. Urbanized terrain, suitable for long-term focus defense of settlements. "

The whole world is the sphere of interests of the United States, and we want to talk about your maneuvers.


Of course, it is strange to think that politicians and military personnel of NATO countries believe these Ukrainian fairy tales. But in fact, there is nothing strange about this. World politics has in its arsenal such a number of various meanness and nastiness, provocations and lies that it is simply ridiculous to talk about the honesty of diplomats. What is needed at the moment for your country will be defended on international platforms as the truth.

Let me remind you of one statement made by Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov. In my opinion, this is the statement to which Washington responded. Something I do not remember that in this way someone threw a dirty rag to American diplomats in modern times:

"Russia is taking the steps on its territory that it considers necessary, and completely ignores signals from the United States that have nothing to do with this."

Translated into common language it sounds shorter: “None of your business! We do not violate anything, no agreements, and it will be more dear to you to poke your nose into our affairs ... "

I don’t think the Americans didn’t understand that it’s stupid to get involved in a diplomatic war. Too many questions about US behavior in various countries of the world may arise in the UN Security Council.

It is much more interesting to deal with the statements made by the defense ministers of France and Germany after Ryabkov's answer. We don't have many naive people. There are very few of those who really thought that the belligerent French and Germans would receive a different answer from Russia than did the peace-loving Americans. But statements have been made and answers have been received. Jean-Yves Le Drian and Annegret Crump-Karrenbauer clearly got it in the nose not only from our Foreign Ministry, but also from the local media.

It is obvious that all these statements are directed towards Kiev. And Washington, Berlin, and Paris actually announced that they would help Ukraine. Council, weapons, ammunition, instructors. But their military does not intend to meddle in Donbass. For NATO countries, as well as for Kiev, a big war is fraught with "loss of statehood."

Moreover, it seems to me that the Europeans do not need a "war at hand" at all. The lockdown brought too many problems. Too much has changed and is changing right now within Europe. And the understanding that with all its superiority in the number of troops, with a huge difference in the economy and other advantages, Europe may not resist the onslaught of Russia. The outcome of the great war is unknown.

Let's "confront" traditionally


Against the background of a multitude of comments and analytical materials in the press, one person, one minister of the Russian government, looked rather strange. Moreover, everything that the politicians of other countries talked about concerns him directly. And it is he who has real information on the actions of the Russian army and the armies of other states, no less than President Putin. I'm talking about Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu.

The Russian army clearly followed Shoigu's orders, acted in accordance with previously approved plans, and moved along previously announced routes. Soldiers and officers once again reported on the work done in half a year in conditions close to combat. The General Staff and other departments of the Ministry of Defense worked in exactly the same way.

Why?

Probably, simply because for the military, any words must be backed up by deeds. And they know not only what the enemy is talking about, but also what he is just thinking about. Especially at the strategic level.

The answer of the Russian minister did follow. April 13 at a meeting in Severomorsk:

“There is a movement of troops in Europe to the Russian borders. The main forces are concentrated in the Black Sea and Baltic region. "

“The main forces are concentrated in the Black Sea and Baltic region. In total, 40 thousand foreign servicemen and 15 thousand units of weapons and military equipment, including strategic ones, will be concentrated near the territory of the Russian Federation. aviation».

"In Poland and the Baltic countries, the US forces are strengthening, the American" four to thirty "concept has been adopted and is being implemented, the intensity of aerial reconnaissance has doubled compared to last year and the intensity of naval reconnaissance has been increased by half.

For those who can “read between the lines”, these particles form a picture quite familiar to our time. NATO, and the United States in particular, absolutely does not want to change the format of confrontation that has been existing for a long time. NATO troops are quietly creeping up to the Russian borders, and in response, Russia is also not particularly noisy about the emergence of new targets for the Aerospace Forces and the Strategic Missile Forces.

I really liked the answer of our Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to the question of why Russia is reacting so harshly to the events in Ukraine.

“The answer is very simple: we live there, this is our country. But what the United States is doing in the form of its ships, military personnel, who constantly organize some kind of NATO activities in Ukraine, thousands of kilometers from their own territory - this question remains unanswered. "

It seems to me that NATO has made it very clear to Russia that it prefers to return to traditional methods of confrontation. It is proposed to “forget” about those threatening statements, about insults, about stupid attempts to intimidate Russia and return to the status quo. Honestly, I am not yet clear on Moscow's reaction to this proposal.

Why did the West need all this


The fact that the United States is playing back, I already wrote above. Likewise, we see such actions from other NATO countries. Yes, armies are on high alert. Yes, the press is escalating the situation. But it seems to me that the decision has already been made. Even the offer to meet in Finland, which came to Putin during a telephone conversation with Biden, fits into this statement.

Let me remind you of another statement by Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov. Again, for some reason not noticed in Russia. But very well understood in the USA. Never before have Russian diplomats of this level called the United States an adversary of Russia. We were everything, anything, but not opponents. In contrast, by the way, from the statements of American diplomats.

"The United States is our adversary, doing everything to undermine Russia's position in the international arena."

Then why?

The answer, it seems to me, lies in the actions of Kiev in the Donbass. The audacity that Zelensky is demonstrating today has already begun to strain both Europeans and Americans. Zelensky is no longer asking to admit Ukraine to NATO, he is demanding. And Paris and Berlin cannot do anything simply because they do not know what Biden has decided.

They failed to frighten Russia.

What's more, the rattling weapons led to a significant aggravation of security problems not only on the borders of the Russian Federation, but also throughout Europe and in the United States. NATO recalled Russia's new military doctrine, which allows strikes not only at troops, but also at decision-making centers.

Here are two more quotes from the latest statements by high-ranking politicians in the United States and Russia.

“The United States is increasingly concerned about the recent rise in Russian aggression in eastern Ukraine, including the movement of Russian troops to the Ukrainian border. There are now more Russian troops on the Russian-Ukrainian border than at any other time in the entire period since 2014, ”

- White House press secretary Jen Psaki on April 8 during a briefing.

“Next to us is a country where civil war is about to resume. Next to us is a country in which we do not exclude that the leadership will again consider it possible to solve the internal problem by force. Is it dangerous for us? Of course it's dangerous. Should we take steps to ensure our safety? Should. This is what we are doing ”,

- Press Secretary of President Putin Dmitry Peskov, “Moscow. Kremlin. Putin "TV channel" Russia 1 ".

So, in my opinion, the West understood that it would be impossible to simply abandon Kiev and the Minsk Agreements due to the vague position of the United States. Letting the situation take its course is also more expensive for yourself. If Ukraine explodes from the inside with a civil war, it will not seem enough to anyone. Russia is in no hurry to solve the problem by military means.

Ukraine has turned into a territory that, by and large, is no longer needed by anyone. This is a territory that even plunders turns out to be more expensive. That is why it is necessary to change the "Minsk" format of negotiations. In fact, abandon the "Minsk", remember Kuchma's statement on this matter, and go to the format of Russia, Ukraine, the United States, France and Germany.
Author:
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. WHAT IS
    WHAT IS April 15 2021 12: 06
    +11
    I really liked the answer of our Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to the question of why Russia is reacting so harshly to the events in Ukraine.

    “The answer is very simple: we live there, this is our country.

    I also liked this answer, damn it!
    This is a territory that even plunders turns out to be more expensive.

    The Biden family will confirm ...
    1. figwam
      figwam April 15 2021 12: 09
      0
      Already some kind of a military delegation from the United States has become plump.
    2. Civil
      Civil April 15 2021 14: 50
      -9
      Behind the impudence of Western politicians lies an elementary fear and inability to solve serious problems

      Yes, they don't give a damn about Russia, that's why they do not consider it necessary to consult.
      And Moscow needs an external enemy to justify economic failures. Like the pension reform, the fall of the ruble, the impoverishment of the population.
      1. Vladimir Mashkov
        Vladimir Mashkov April 15 2021 15: 27
        -1
        "Behind the impudence of Western politicians lies elementary fear and inability to solve serious problems"
        "Why all this было the West needs "

        It seems that Alexander is sure that the United States has already surrendered and canceled the APU invasion of Donbass. Is not it too early?
  2. Gato
    Gato April 15 2021 12: 11
    +11
    A lot of words and a brilliant conclusion - Russia was not intimidated, therefore it is necessary to introduce the USA into the Minsk format belay
    1. Basarev
      Basarev April 15 2021 12: 39
      +4
      Are other countries really needed? In my opinion, Russia and the United States alone are enough.
      1. Gato
        Gato April 15 2021 12: 41
        +1
        By and large, yes. But you need to support the self-esteem of partners. lol
    2. credo
      credo April 15 2021 12: 46
      +8
      Quote: Gato
      A lot of words and a brilliant conclusion - Russia was not intimidated, therefore it is necessary to introduce the USA into the Minsk format belay

      Something I did not find anything in the Author's article about "elementary fear".
      Neither the Anglo-Saxons nor their vassals show anything like that, and the reference to fear is simply inappropriate here.
      Everything is simpler - it did not work out to scare Russia and force it to comply with the requirements of the United States, which means they will act in other ways. That's the whole story.
      1. Gato
        Gato April 15 2021 12: 51
        0
        Something I did not find anything in the Author's article about "elementary fear".

        Direct quote from Author's Article:
        They failed to frighten Russia.
        1. credo
          credo April 15 2021 13: 09
          +7
          Quote: Gato
          Something I did not find anything in the Author's article about "elementary fear".

          Direct quote from Author's Article:
          They failed to frighten Russia.

          If Russia did not succeed in frightening, then it does not follow from this that the United States and NATO were themselves frightened of their swoop.
          I do not believe at all that the political leadership and behind the scenes of the United States and NATO have ever feared Russia, the Russian Empire, the USSR or Russia. They are only concerned about one thing - so that Russia in the economic and political terms does not become stronger and more attractive to other countries of the world. This is what they are fighting for, clotheing their goals with a verbal veil and husk for the layman, both their own and Russian.
          1. Gato
            Gato April 15 2021 13: 14
            0
            I do not believe at all that the political leadership and behind the scenes of the United States and NATO have ever feared Russia, the Russian Empire, the USSR or Russia.

            And I think that they were definitely afraid of the USSR, right down to mental disorders. In the end, they are not there the Little Red Riding Hood from the anecdote, who "knows the way and loves sex."
            1. credo
              credo April 15 2021 13: 28
              +6
              Quote: Gato
              And I think that they were definitely afraid of the USSR, right down to mental disorders. In the end, they are not there the Little Red Riding Hood from the anecdote, who "knows the way and loves sex."

              This is an illusion.
              At the level of the top officials and elites of the NATO countries, there was no fear of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact countries. They knew very well before and know now that Russia has never had and never has a desire to get into this mess called "Western and Central Europe".
              It is another matter for the townsfolk, who constantly need to be kept in suspense so that they are more obedient and docile. And for such a role, someone was always found both in ancient times and today.
        2. dorz
          dorz April 15 2021 13: 27
          +6
          The USA slowly began to play back ...

          Polish and British special forces arrived in Ukraine, the Americans are there by default, the Turks have already expressed their support. The country has received 5 NATO air cargo aircraft. Where and what fears did the author see?
          1. Gato
            Gato April 15 2021 13: 29
            +2
            Turks have already expressed their support

            The Turks have already declared their neutrality.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  3. rocket757
    rocket757 April 15 2021 12: 13
    +3
    Behind the impudence of Western politicians lies an elementary fear and inability to solve serious problems
    ... Yes, yes, but in my opinion, this can be said for any politician! Here, there, EVERYWHERE!
    1. cniza
      cniza April 15 2021 18: 27
      +2
      They crushed, there are no those global strategists ...
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 April 15 2021 18: 52
        +2
        Everything is learned in comparison ... but, as an example, a standard, it is better not to take someone from the great past. How to compare them, if you have to move away from one in order to see all its greatness, but you shouldn't approach the present without a magnifying glass, you can't see it.
        1. cniza
          cniza April 15 2021 18: 55
          +3
          And therefore, we observe children's games in the sandbox ...
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 April 15 2021 19: 05
            +2
            If only to observe from the side ... their games concern us, often very painful.
            1. cniza
              cniza April 15 2021 19: 06
              +2
              There is such a thing, we need to leave their classes and answer in an adult ...
  4. No name B
    No name B April 15 2021 12: 16
    0
    The only way out for Ukraine is to abandon Donbass or to carry out denazification. The Ukrainian authorities are incapable of either.
  5. RealPilot
    RealPilot April 15 2021 12: 27
    0
    That is why it is necessary to change the "Minsk" format of negotiations. In fact, abandon the "Minsk", remember Kuchma's statement on this matter, and go to the format of Russia, Ukraine, the United States, France and Germany.

    I fundamentally disagree with this!
    The Minsk agreements were adopted by the UN Security Council, this is an important document and it just calms the situation if it is implemented. This is a diplomatic victory for Russia, which helped freeze the conflict and buy time.

    In fact, according to these agreements, Ukraine is a neutral, defashed confederation, the regions of which retain their special cultural and economic rights, and have their own law enforcement forces. Or it just won't be there.

    And then, after the end of the hot stage of the war, there follows a dialogue and internal Ukrainian reconciliation, a public discussion. And honest conversation within society is needed, you can't do without it.
    And if these agreements are not fulfilled, then Ukraine will disintegrate. There are pros and cons in each case ...
    1. Vlad5307
      Vlad5307 April 15 2021 12: 46
      -1
      The federal structure of the Outskirts is not beneficial to the West. They understand that in this case, most of this underemployed will fall under the influence of Russia, and they will get the poor Galicia, led by the Ukronazis and their problems with the Polish masters. Therefore, they do not allow the implementation of the Minsk agreements. The outskirts will still return to the bosom of Russia, but this is just a delay in time and a waste of people. The West is already losing to the Outskirts, because it thinks in adventures and is short-sighted. hi
    2. Kronos
      Kronos April 15 2021 12: 47
      +3
      These agreements only allowed Ukraine to escape and caused enormous damage to the DPR and LPR.
  6. Doctor
    Doctor April 15 2021 12: 35
    0
    “On September 7, 2018, Chief of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces Valery Gerasimov assessed the combat readiness of the ground forces of the RF Armed Forces:

    “Today the Land and Airborne Forces have 126 battalion tactical groups, staffed by contract soldiers and are in constant readiness to carry out combat missions. Mostly contract servicemen serve in combat units. "

    Battalion tactical groups.
    Here are the real combat units.
    It remains to bring them into brigades.
    1. Gato
      Gato April 15 2021 13: 36
      +3
      Battalion tactical groups.
      Here are the real combat units.
      It remains to bring them into brigades.

      laughing
      Battalion tactical groups are formed within a brigade or regiment for the duration of a combat or training mission. Why bring them back to brigades? belay It's like distilling vodka into alcohol and calling it vodka. drinks
      1. Doctor
        Doctor April 15 2021 14: 33
        -2
        laughing
        Battalion tactical groups are formed within a brigade or regiment for the duration of a combat or training mission. Why bring them back to brigades? belay It's like distilling vodka into alcohol and calling it vodka.

        And why should they be formed at all for the period of hostilities? By creating an uncoordinated unit with an unknown commander. belay
        Why not create them in peacetime, bring them into a brigade and, if something happens, transfer them as a single controlled organism? soldier

        It's like diluting alcohol before drinking, you can just buy a box of vodka. drinks
        1. Gennady M
          Gennady M April 20 2021 22: 02
          0
          Did you carry a box of vodka? 8 bottles of alcohol are much less than 20. And water is everywhere
          1. Doctor
            Doctor April 20 2021 22: 11
            0
            Did you carry a box of vodka? 8 bottles of alcohol are much less than 20. And water is everywhere

            Not so with BTG. They carry both water and alcohol, mix them on the spot. It turns out not ice. No.
    2. Speedy
      Speedy April 15 2021 15: 19
      0
      They are already from the brigades and regiments.
      1. Doctor
        Doctor April 15 2021 17: 15
        0
        They are already from the brigades and regiments.

        From DIFFERENT brigades and regiments. What is the essence.
        1. Speedy
          Speedy April 15 2021 17: 26
          0
          By itself. From regiments and brigades, BTGs are formed with companies reinforced at the expense of other battles. And Regimental and brigade reinforcement. The rest of the baht is in the PPD. For rotation and formation of second BTGs, etc. According to the experience of the 1st and 2nd Chechen wars, usually the full complement of the regiments and brigades did not go, a maximum of 2 baht per regiment. But almost all of the art is regimental and brigade. And engineers with intelligence.
          1. Doctor
            Doctor April 15 2021 17: 39
            0
            By itself. From regiments and brigades, BTGs are formed with companies reinforced at the expense of other battles. And Regimental and brigade reinforcement. The rest of the baht is in the PPD. For rotation and formation of second BTGs, etc. According to the experience of the 1st and 2nd Chechen wars, usually the full complement of the regiments and brigades did not go, a maximum of 2 baht per regiment. But almost all of the art is regimental and brigade. And engineers with intelligence.

            And it is right?
            1. Speedy
              Speedy April 15 2021 17: 42
              0
              It depends for what purpose. To fight NATO - of course not. And for business trips to the Caucasus and to "exercises", when it is necessary to quickly transfer the most combat-ready units - yes. Non-combat units and conscripts remain in the PPD.
              1. Doctor
                Doctor April 15 2021 19: 08
                0
                It depends for what purpose. To fight NATO - of course not. And for business trips to the Caucasus and to "exercises", when it is necessary to quickly transfer the most combat-ready units - yes. Non-combat units and conscripts remain in the PPD.

                Yeah. Instead of four well-coordinated normal brigades, collect such a vinaigrette and navigate Grozny. And this is without the sailors and policemen. laughing

                1. Speedy
                  Speedy April 15 2021 19: 15
                  0
                  Well, Grozny was stormed in general what it was, there, in principle, there were not even BTGs, but consolidated battalions and regiments.
            2. Gato
              Gato April 15 2021 18: 02
              0
              And it is right?

              On this occasion, the academies write dissertations laughing
              Probably right, because for solving a specific problem, the entire team with all its appendicitis is simply not needed. For example, if the enemy a priori does not have aviation, then there is no need to drag anti-aircraft gunners with you - let them pick their nose at the PPD.
              Actually, according to the history of the issue, you can read about the German Kampf groups, as far as I know, this fashion came from them.
              1. Doctor
                Doctor April 15 2021 19: 13
                0
                Actually, according to the history of the issue, you can read about the German Kampf groups, as far as I know, this fashion came from them.

                The Kempf Group is an army association. From divisions and corps.

                And we are talking about a normal tactical formation of 6000 - 4000 people, which in peacetime is quietly engaged in combat training, and when it is necessary to fight, leaves the commandant battalion in full force in the PPD and go ahead!
  7. Alexander Kopychev
    Alexander Kopychev April 15 2021 12: 41
    0
    However, Ukraine also has superiority in a number of critical components:

    2. Availability of a large trained reserve with combat experience

    Many of them went through the cauldrons. What is their motivation?
    1. Gato
      Gato April 15 2021 13: 42
      -1
      Many of them went through the cauldrons. What is their motivation?

      If you don't run away, then at least keep warm.
  8. mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov April 15 2021 12: 50
    +4
    I am quoting the title of the author. Behind the impudence of Western politicians lies an elementary fear and inability to solve serious problems... I am reading the conclusion of the author, they say, it is necessary to abandon the Minsk format and go to the format Russia, Ukraine, USA, France and Germany.
    Author: where is the logic? And why is Ukraine "no longer needed"? I would like proof.
    1. domokl
      April 15 2021 19: 34
      0
      Read also what is written between these phrases. And it says that the second phrase is the goal of Western politicians, which they are trying to achieve by whipping up military hysteria in Ukraine. I understand that there are a lot of letters, but that is why he analyzes, so that there are many letters. Otherwise, the author's logic is incomprehensible.
  9. Mikhail3
    Mikhail3 April 15 2021 12: 56
    +1
    And now, after a lot of statements and the transfer of units, after Biden's swinish statement regarding President Putin, the United States slowly began to play back.
    Well, actually, the United States began to hastily play back strictly after one of our military inquired about the bacterial laboratories surrounding our country. It was then that American peacefulness erupted like a volcano! Once again, the opportunity was missed to deliver a tactically decisive blow to the enemy.
    It was necessary not to chat, but to make sure that "no one knows whose" special forces took Fort Derrick. After that, it was necessary to organize a broad presentation for a world audience about what they were doing there. But, since everything was limited to chatter and puffing of cheeks, now "American forces in Germany are increasing." Something seems to me that these very forces are heavily loaded with containers sterilized from the outside. For a couple of months, these guys will sit quietly in Germany. And what will happen next, given that the secrecy has already floated ...
  10. Free wind
    Free wind April 15 2021 13: 24
    -4
    About 70% of the voters voted for the proclamation of the state of Ukraine. And residents of Donbass and Crimea.
    1. Gato
      Gato April 15 2021 13: 43
      0
      Yeah, and before that they voted to preserve the USSR
  11. Vladimir61
    Vladimir61 April 15 2021 14: 01
    +1
    There can be only one format for new negotiations on Donbass - Ukraine is not a bloc country (i.e. before the known changes to the Constitution after a coup d'état), recognizes the UN resolution on combating the glorification of Nazism, prohibits ultra-right nationalist organizations, abolishes discriminatory laws on languages, culture, The media attracts those responsible for unleashing a civil war and killing civilians in Donbass, compensates for the consequences of the destruction of infrastructure, returns all debts to pensioners, releases political prisoners with the involvement of the perpetrators, objectively investigates the events on the Maidan, the subsequent coup d'etat and mass political killings in Odessa and Kharkov.
  12. wolf46
    wolf46 April 15 2021 17: 04
    0
    "That is why it is necessary ... to abandon Minsk ... and switch to the format of Russia, Ukraine, the United States, France and Germany."
    1) Ukraine is an object of international relations;
    2) the United States introduced another package of sanctions;
    3) France and Germany are responsible for the failure of "Minsk".
    Who is there to negotiate with?)
    1. domokl
      April 15 2021 19: 38
      0
      I agree. But there is a decision of the UN Security Council ... The situation is twisted very competently. That's why so many colleagues support Gordia .. Cut the knot to hell and that's it. Only a bundle will require a lot of human blood ...
      1. Black lotos
        Black lotos April 16 2021 10: 39
        0
        Quote: domokl
        But there is a UN Security Council decision

        appeal to decisions of international organizations? It's funny. There were so many of them in Ukraine ... but we appeal only to MC2. International position on territorial integrity (and this is a typical recommendation).
        It is foolish to appeal to the fact that we ourselves violate and see how we want, even according to the principle of force. There is always someone stronger and more allies / economy, etc.
        In addition, everyone reads MC 2 as they want. Therefore, everyone appeals to him and the Russian Federation continues to receive sanctions for him.
        And the principle of chopping everything by force without thinking about the consequences = has already led to casualties.
  13. Andre
    Andre April 16 2021 00: 35
    0
    Looking at the exercises of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, it seems that they are preparing to fight as in the Second World War. They bang at them from afar with volume-detonating ammunition and all their heroism.
  14. wolf46
    wolf46 April 16 2021 12: 34
    0
    Quote: Black Lotos
    appeal to decisions of international organizations? It's funny. There were so many of them in Ukraine. Besides, everyone reads MC 2 as they want. And the principle of chopping everything by force without thinking about the consequences = has already led to casualties.
    Nothing to add.
  15. TatarinSSSR
    TatarinSSSR April 16 2021 14: 03
    -1
    What is the meaning of all this written? That the US and NATO were afraid of the formidable accumulation of Russian troops in the fields near Ukraine? They were scared - they would not continue to catch up with troops and increase bases to the borders of Russia, would not impose new sanctions and would not fly along the borders. Nobody was afraid of anyone. All these statements of officials cited by the author are just chatter for the press. The United States wanted to provoke Russia into military intervention in Donbass in response to the offensive. To declare Russia as an aggressor and an outcast to the whole world. And force Germany to close SP-2. For the sake of Germany, it was all conceived. But the Ukrainian military leaders did not dare. Poe were afraid of their generals on the campaign. We understood the consequences. For they saw how many things rolled up to the borders from Russia. And even the servant clown Zelensky, who rode along the front, could not force them. Therefore, they turned the amerskiye ships back, because there will be no kin. All, for the fact that the war did not happen, Biden rolled in the sanctions. Loud but not fatal. Everyone, we disperse. And the author of the blizzard was driving something pretentious here.
  16. Alecsandr
    Alecsandr April 17 2021 21: 01
    0
    This is exactly. There is such a feeling of some fear of Russia. The whole world is in dust as in the movie "DMB" The Americans are well aware of this.
  17. Iron Felix
    Iron Felix April 18 2021 13: 46
    0
    I can’t understand who scared whom.

    According to Shoigu,

    The North Atlantic Alliance will concentrate 40 servicemen and 15 units of weapons and military equipment near Russia's borders, said Russian Defense Minister General of the Army Sergei Shoigu.

    One might think that he means NATO scientists somewhere near the summer, about which Lavrov expressed concern.

    Russia will react to NATO exercises Defender Europe 2020, scheduled for spring, said Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.

    True, then it is not clear why it was necessary to transfer the army now?

    In the course of the verification check, Russia successfully transferred two armies and three airborne units to its western borders. This was announced by Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu at a meeting in Severomorsk on Tuesday. According to him, the troops were sent "to the areas where training and combat missions are being carried out." Shoigu noted that this was done in response to threats from NATO.

    Or maybe all these gestures are due to Ukraine, or, as Lavrov said, accusing Kiev of allegedly transferring troops to the contact line in Donbass?

    Of course, we will react. We cannot ignore the processes that cause great concern, "Lavrov said in an interview with Rossiyskaya Gazeta.
  18. kytx
    kytx April 19 2021 14: 04
    0
    The Minsk agreements are some kind of intermediate introduction that was supposed to change something more significant
    In fact - Kiev does not comply with the Minsk agreements, Moscow says: why do you want from us at all, we don’t have a tam! The Americans are sadly mumbling that Moscow is mowing but does not provide evidence.
    Europe is losing income, it can no longer supply to the Russian Federation what has become "dual-use" (well, I can also turn phone 3310 into a dual-use), but I want to supply because the loot is by the way.
    Europe is quietly angry (not at the Russian Federation)
    China, this damn finally can be completely cut off. Imagines himself as a telecom locomotive. It's no business! America should steer here.
    if it were not for our fucking internal policy of the "party of all times", the Russian Federation could raise a healthy profit on this boil.
    while yachts are breaking records ... yeah
  19. your1970
    your1970 April 20 2021 22: 17
    0
    Quote: Mikhail3
    It was necessary not to chat, but to make sure that "no one knows whose" special forces took Fort Derrick. After that, it was necessary to organize a broad presentation for a world audience about what they were doing there.

    Why waste time on trifles .... Take Fort Knox at once. ... ... Again, you can provide the general public with empty gold vaults ...
    fool