Military Review

Hacking the "no access zone": the Pentagon is preparing a new strategy against Russia and China

64

Source: armytimes.com


Multi-domain war


For several years now, the minds of American strategists have been agitated by the idea of ​​developing a full-fledged multi-domain strike force capable of fighting equally effectively on land, in the air, on water, in space and in cyberspace. The reason for this seemingly quite logical step was the defense strategies of Russia and China.

Over the decades, the antagonistic countries of the United States have created a completely effective system of "denial of access" to their own territory, or, as it is scientifically called in the Pentagon, Anti-Access / Area Denial, A2 / AD. This term refers to a set of measures aimed at preserving Moscow and Beijing's own sovereignty. The Americans are simply not allowed to try to occupy these countries, like Iraq or Syria, without massive bloodshed. In the event of an invasion, the armed forces of Russia and China must inflict such damage on the American army in the event of an invasion that the US electorate will find absolutely unacceptable within the framework of the "no-access zones".

The United States, with its decades-long strategy, has itself set a precedent for Russian-Chinese retaliatory actions. The Pentagon has always focused its main attack on the forces of the Navy and Air Force. Most often, technological superiority allowed the Americans to destroy most of the enemy's forces with missile weapons и aviation... To one degree or another, this happened in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Libya.


Source: armytimes.com

In recent years, the US ground forces have been assigned a mission to combat terrorists, as well as to hold captured local facilities. There was no talk of any direct confrontation with a real regular army, like the Russian or Chinese. Such wars were supposed to be waged by aircraft carriers and their retinue and the world's most modern air force. But all this is possible only at a distance from the main territory of potential adversaries. As soon as the war gets close to the coast or borders of Russia and China, the situation for the United States will be dire. At least that's what American analysts think in their recent report Army Multi-Domain Transformation: Ready to win in Competition and Conflict. The most dangerous for the security of the United States is China, whose combined military power by 2040 will be equal to that of the United States. Together with Moscow, Beijing by this time will be able to challenge the entire NATO bloc.

Pentagon analysts in stories with multi-domain forces give the example of 1940. France, possessing the strongest army for its time and the Maginot defensive line, fell in a few weeks to the highly mobile troops of the Third Reich. The United States refuses to repeat the fate of France and is ready for an early change in the ground forces.

The American salvation in this situation is multi-domain (multi-sphere) ground forces capable of coordinating their actions with aviation, fleet, space group and cyber units. According to the idea of ​​the developers, the ground units should establish operational communication with all of the above directly, bypassing the general headquarters. The closest to what is described is the MDTF-1 Multi-Domain Task Force, formed back in 2018.

The multi-domain division is located at the Lewis-McCord base in Washington state and has performed well over two years. True, only during exercises. In 2018, MDTF-1 was seen on NATO RIMPAC maneuvers.

Hacking the "no access zone"


It was decided to replicate the experience of MDTF-1 in 2021 in three more regions - in Germany, in the Pacific Ocean and in the Arctic. Interestingly, multi-domain unit structures can scale from the operational level to strategically significant strike forces. Tactical nuclear weapons are expected to appear in the most advanced version of the MDTF.


Source: media.defense.gov

The multidomain forces should become in the future hypothetical conflict a backbone unit around which the entire operation to break into the notorious "access denial zone" will revolve. The combat formation includes a multifunctional reconnaissance battalion, cyber warfare, electronic warfare and space communications.

It is he who is the main "highlight" of the multi-domain unit, distinguishing it from the rest. The direct strike functions in the MDTF are performed by a strike battalion consisting of a HIMARS MLRS battery, a battery of medium-range missiles of the SM-6 or Tomahawk type, as well as long-range hypersonic missiles. The air defense role is performed by a separate Air Defense Battalion. This structure is approximate and can vary widely depending on the tasks.


Source: armyrecognition.com

Deploying a multi-domain force will require massive changes in several technology areas from the US Army. Funding for a number of developments has already been partially allocated in the last couple of years.

First of all, hypersonic missiles, medium-range ballistic missiles and extended-range guided artillery ammunition await at the MDTF.

Secondly, it is for the multi-domain forces that the optionally inhabited BMP OMFV, the AMPV armored personnel carrier to replace the well-deserved M113 and the light tank of the MPF project are created. There are also plans to saturate multi-domain forces with robotic platforms of the light and middle class.

The third technological challenge associated with the new "omnipotent" divisions is the development of a family of convertiplanes of various classes and purposes. The first vehicles, which even have a vague appearance, should come to the troops by 2030.

The fourth direction of development for multi-domain technology lies in the development of a unified information and communication environment. This definition, which has already set the teeth on edge, should provide a qualitative advantage of the MDTF over the enemy in terms of command and control.

The fifth point of the development plan was a progressive air defense and missile defense, designed to close the sky not only from aircraft and missiles, but also from enemy artillery ammunition.

And, finally, the high-tech equipment of the fighters is becoming the icing on the cake in the system of multi-domain divisions. Perfect night vision and augmented reality systems will dominate the battlefield.

The Pentagon is trying to predict how the Americans will fight in 10, 20 and 30 years. The creation of MDFT Multi-Domain OUs is one of the most important steps along this path, but it is not the only one.

There are plans to hold large-scale military games in cyberspace on existing gaming platforms. One such company RAND held in September last year, when the latest robotic units of the United States and frankly outdated Russian troops fought in a virtual battle. It happened in 2030 in the Baltics. Analysts, in particular, during the game decided on the specifics of the use of ground combat drones. The US military will commission science fiction writers to develop options for the development of events on the battlefields of the future. In the near future, a competition will be announced for the best work of this format.

The search for scenarios for future wars has become for Americans not only a stimulus for technological development, but also a creative challenge.
Author:
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. sergo1914
    sergo1914 April 14 2021 05: 12
    +5
    Walkers must be built. Have you really survived?
    1. Shkworen
      Shkworen April 14 2021 11: 07
      +7
      class emperor, no less :)
      1. Cool but not Igor
        Cool but not Igor April 14 2021 15: 37
        0
        Correctly, the authors are doing a better job, especially with a state that has such ambitions and opportunities, as well as taking into account the experience of the past and present.
  2. Pessimist22
    Pessimist22 April 14 2021 05: 18
    +1
    Didn't they measure out a lot for themselves, 2040, by that time the Negroes will plunder and enslave the United States completely.
    1. Mitroha
      Mitroha April 14 2021 06: 07
      +1
      Today is the day of admiration for US forces announced on VO? Here Fedorov gasped about the development of invincible troops, in the next article Timokhin blows bubbles of admiration for the work of the US Air Force. I read the American propaganda press over coffee in the morning.
      Do we have only footcloths? Everything is lost?
      1. mark2
        mark2 April 14 2021 06: 47
        +1
        Today is the day of admiration for US forces announced on VO?

        Why only today. Here every day they admire the military power of the United States (this is a patriotic site), but for no reason. Today there is simply a reason: Beloved Americans have again figured out how to cut the budget. Isn't this a joy for a Russian intellectual? A liberal intellectual on a completely oppositional website.
        1. SovAr238A
          SovAr238A April 14 2021 21: 01
          -2
          Quote: mark2
          Today is the day of admiration for US forces announced on VO?

          Why only today. Here every day they admire the military power of the United States (this is a patriotic site), but for no reason. Today there is simply a reason: Beloved Americans have again figured out how to cut the budget. Isn't this a joy for a Russian intellectual? A liberal intellectual on a completely oppositional website.


          Why did it happen?
          You yourself invented that the site called Military Review is patriotic?
          In principle, this site 10 years ago was an Internet analogue of the later version of the journal "Foreign Military Review". Where were the articles about military equipment. Countries of the world.
          But not for rampant patriotism.

          For patriots - there are other sites.
          1. Ka-52
            Ka-52 April 16 2021 04: 23
            0
            In principle, this site 10 years ago was an Internet analogue of the later version of the journal "Foreign Military Review". Where were the articles about military equipment. Countries of the world.
            But not for rampant patriotism.

            and not in any way for all the propals and gorlopanov from the Pokrovsky inmate's brigade, like you.
            For patriots - there are other sites.

            as well as for all the propals and bulk there are other sites. But you are grazing here. And any topic, even a highly specialized one, such as the device of a urinal on a long-range bomber, you turn into a revolutionary verbiage on the topic: "In Russia, even with urinals, everything is bad! But Americans have urinals like urinals, all urinals have urinals!"
      2. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky April 14 2021 11: 27
        -3
        Quote: Mitroha
        I read the American propaganda press over coffee in the morning. Do we have only footcloths? Everything is lost?

        Nothing is missing. Russia is scary with improvisation and non-standard solutions, and mattresses mostly stay within the established patterns.
        Pin them an outlet to a tree, so they will go to her cell phone for three days, until they add that there is no current in the birch and they need to look for a sequoia.
        1. seacap
          seacap April 14 2021 11: 59
          +1
          The Matrosovs and Gastello, as well as others at the front and in the rear, are the product of a "totalitarian bloody regime. For Stalin, For the Motherland!" development and continuous breakthroughs "especially among the nobility, slaves with what slogans will go to machine guns," For the loot, and Deripaska " that only for the money spent on one of Abramovich's yachts, it is possible to provide fishing vessels for the regional fleet or a large river shipping company with bulk carriers, etc., etc., I deeply doubt that all these "patriots" gatherings of Kiriyenko and Edra, with Rublyovka and so on, with diplomas from Oxfords, Yale and other studies will rush, firing rubber on their Ferraris and Bugatti, to take the queue at the military registration and enlistment offices.
          1. Per se.
            Per se. April 14 2021 14: 32
            +3
            Quote: seacap
            I doubt very deeply that all these "patriots" of the gatherings of Kirienko and Edra, from Rublyovka and so on, with Oxfords, Yale and other educational diplomas, will rush, firing rubber on their Ferrari and Bugatti, to take the queue at the military enlistment offices.

            Who have not served in the army in the "Bugatti" and "Ferrari" and are not going to. Another question is who served and is ready to defend the Russian people, whether they will be allowed to "queue up at the military registration and enlistment offices" ... It's one thing to puff up their cheeks, raising their ratings, it's another to bomb those who have your billions of dollars in foreign currency accounts in banks, children at school and permanent residence, wives on treatment, lovers on vacation, yachts at the pier, villas and penthouses.
            To accept the ultimatum or even surrender, in the name of the world of humanism and tolerance, may seem much wiser than our "elite". So why should the United States strain so hard, they have long been heroes, when seven against one, or when someone else's hands. The Soviet Union defeated Hollywood, we were outplayed by political cheats, demagogues and scoundrels. What kind of hacking the “no access zone” is there, they are going to create our Central Bank for a long time under the IMF and the Fed, they have what they want, hundreds of billions are flowing out of Russia. Why destroy this freebie, so, another show on the theme of "fighting dogs" who fight for the owners who make money on them.
          2. Nyrobsky
            Nyrobsky April 14 2021 14: 50
            +3
            Quote: seacap
            "For Stalin, For the Motherland!" - this is under the dictator and the gulags, with detachments and other nightmares. But now, with "prosperity and innovative development and continuous breakthroughs" especially among the nobility, what slogans will the slaves use machine guns, "For the loot, and Deripaska", "We will not disgrace Abramovich for Moskvat and the fleet"?

            The fact is that the enemy always attacks the STATE, and gets in the face from the MOTHERLAND. Here people will go FOR THE HOMELAND.
            As history shows, after the people have dealt with the foe, the frightened elite at this time, as never before, miraculously cut through the ears to the needs of the people and an "unbridled" desire to share a part of their pie appears.
            1. seacap
              seacap April 14 2021 16: 26
              +2
              Quote: Nyrobsky
              The fact is that the enemy always attacks the STATE, and gets in the face from the MOTHERLAND.

              I don’t need to tell this, in the 90s I "drank" to the fullest and, moreover, served in the troops "in every barrel a plug", and now I am trying to live on "gratitude."
              1. Nyrobsky
                Nyrobsky April 14 2021 16: 31
                +6
                Quote: seacap
                Quote: Nyrobsky
                The fact is that the enemy always attacks the STATE, and gets in the face from the MOTHERLAND.

                I don't need to tell it ...
                As a matter of fact, I do not insist. You knocked on my comment, I replied.
                Quote: seacap
                in the 90s I "drank" to the full extent and, moreover, I served in the troops "in every barrel a plug", and now I am trying to live on "gratitude"
                Well, here you are definitely not alone and dozens of those who are present here, including me, live on "gratitude". Let's finish for this hi
          3. clerk
            clerk April 14 2021 22: 35
            +3
            ... First of all, hypersonic missiles, medium-range ballistic missiles and extended-range guided artillery ammunition await at the MDTF. The fourth direction of development for multi-domain technology lies in the development of a unified information and communication environment. This definition, which has already set the teeth on edge, should provide a qualitative advantage of the MDTF over the enemy in terms of command and control.

            The fifth point of the development plan was a progressive air defense and missile defense, designed to close the sky not only from aircraft and missiles, but also from enemy artillery ammunition.
            I doubt very deeply that all these "patriots" of the gatherings of Kirienko and Edra, from Rublyovka and so on, with Oxfords, Yale and other educational diplomas, will rush, firing rubber on their Ferrari and Bugatti, to take the queue at the military enlistment offices.
            And then we wonder why we, so patriotic, have their snouts cleaned up again? That's for the very thing - for the fact that any serious conversation is reduced to duty howls about the unprincipled, thieves and Gauleiters. It's time to change the worn-out posture
        2. Ka-52
          Ka-52 April 14 2021 12: 45
          +1
          Pin them an outlet to a tree, so they will go to her cell phone for three days, until they add that there is no current in the birch and they need to look for a sequoia.

          laughing laughing laughing
          1. No name B
            No name B April 15 2021 19: 10
            0
            A very big underestimation of the Americans, whose population is 3-3,5 times more than in Russia. And the people there are different, here in my village in the Kiev region, Americans live and work for 12 years. They bought the territory of an old collective farm, cleared of thickets and debris, sowed fields, help those in need. The sectarians themselves are some sort, either Shtunds or Mormons. Replaced every 4 years. Women in toe-length skirts, internet for adults only. No computers and phones for children, only live music. They built hangars and bought a bunch of agricultural equipment, they are building houses for their own in the place of the redeemed huts, which are completely demolished.
            So I think these Americans will teach us how to get electricity ...
            1. ebrd
              ebrd April 15 2021 20: 03
              +1
              Banned on Google? Not able to find out the population of the USA and the Russian Federation? ,, three and a half times ,, .... The Americans will teach ... Why are you so dashing and quickly pissed away everything inherited from the USSR?
        3. SovAr238A
          SovAr238A April 14 2021 21: 10
          -2
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          Quote: Mitroha
          I read the American propaganda press over coffee in the morning. Do we have only footcloths? Everything is lost?

          Nothing is missing. Russia is scary with improvisation and non-standard solutions, and mattresses mostly stay within the established patterns.
          Pin them an outlet to a tree, so they will go to her cell phone for three days, until they add that there is no current in the birch and they need to look for a sequoia.


          Only now, everything that you infect with, how you charge, on what standards, technologies, etc. it all works - everything is western. Although in the last 20 years it has been made in China.
          But western.
          And you just joke about birches and sequoias.

          And so plug into the socket according to the CEE 7/4 type F, aka "Schuko", where the electric current flows according to the IEC 60038: 2009 standard, your computer on Intel processors, etc. etc. and you will write about birches and sequoias ... And about the fact that "Well, Stupid!" ...
          Chouzhtam.
          1. clerk
            clerk April 15 2021 07: 40
            +1
            Only now, everything that you infect with, how you charge, on what standards, technologies, etc. it all works - everything is western. Although in the last 20 years it has been made in China.
            But western.].
            And gunpowder, with the help of which the West kills people, was invented in Kmtai. And what does this prove?
      3. Artyom Karagodin
        Artyom Karagodin April 14 2021 16: 21
        +1
        Well, why such a hat? We need to take the Americans seriously. Today they are the most powerful country in the world, alas.

        Pieta and aspirations about this from the authors did not notice, but only an attempt to give a sober assessment of the military potential of the United States. Of course, they did not perform in the best way in Iraq and Afghanistan, but judging by the above article, they draw conclusions from this. Or do we already know in advance that they will not succeed? Here everyone would be only happy about it, of course, but it can and will work out. So you need to keep this opportunity in mind.
      4. puskarinkis
        puskarinkis April 14 2021 21: 19
        0
        And where exactly are the US forces "admired" in the article? She's rather ironic.
  3. apro
    apro April 14 2021 05: 21
    -5
    for retaliatory Russian-Chinese actions

    Yes ... the cordinal and the innkeeper is a force, but the PRC is in no hurry to become allies of the Russian Federation, and the Chinese have a slightly different strategy, instead of forceful confrontation, economic penetration.
    1. novel66
      novel66 April 14 2021 08: 33
      +8
      cordinal and innkeeper

      cardinal and haberdasher, for a second
      1. NIKN
        NIKN April 14 2021 11: 35
        -1
        Quote: novel xnumx
        cordinal and innkeeper

        cardinal and haberdasher, for a second

        Roma hello! hi The haberdasher is an integral part of the Western Armed Forces, he and only he is able to provide the troops with diapers! wink
        1. novel66
          novel66 April 14 2021 12: 00
          0
          Kolya hi , forgot about the lace panties
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 14 2021 05: 59
    +3
    The US military will commission science fiction writers to develop options for the development of events on the battlefields of the future.
    This is a joke? Or will the Pentagon really be guided by science fiction writers, twisting the arms of the military-industrial complex and achieving the unrealizable in this decade? It may be easier to collect "eggheads" from the military-industrial complex and discuss wishes and possibilities with them.
    1. dzvero
      dzvero April 14 2021 08: 08
      0
      "Eggheads" are tied with concern for reputation, a warm place and an established understanding of reality. Scientists, on the contrary, the crazier the idea, the better, and they will pay and will not scold smile And the "eggheads" will be collected later and forced to analyze someone else's nonsense. It’s easier and more fun, and you can amuse PSV ...
      1. IS-80_RVGK2
        IS-80_RVGK2 April 14 2021 10: 24
        0
        This initiative is bullshit. Scientists, engineers, inventors, and not writers of beautiful letters should be engaged in such developments.
  5. mark1
    mark1 April 14 2021 06: 45
    +3
    In general, it turns out that any collision (extreme probability of collision) with the American Armed Forces should cause an instant strike on the territory of the United States. Otherwise, a battalion with medium-range missiles will do something like that, and we won't have time to scratch ourselves. We need a strategy for the instant transfer of the database to American territory, up to the covert deployment of specials. forces and nuclear weapons in the United States in peacetime (like ours with nuclear backpacks in the 80s)
    1. ABC-schütze
      ABC-schütze April 14 2021 12: 32
      +3
      On the whole, you are absolutely right. A small quote from the article: "The Armed Forces of Russia and China must inflict such damage on the US Army in the event of an invasion within the framework of the" no-access zones "that the US electorate will find it absolutely unacceptable." I marked the word "armies" in CAPITAL LETTERS. After all, wars are waged not by “armies”, but by states (coalitions of states. ” or strikes on Russian territory, without a simultaneous invasion) will be regarded as the beginning of a war.Moreover, it was emphasized at the highest level that retaliatory actions (strikes) by Russia would be directed not only to the forces and means of the aggressor, but also "to the decision-making centers ". And, presumably, in the context of the United States, not only for them, but also for everything critical to the security of the States (their economy, defense, public administration, etc.). For this, there is reason to believe that the aforementioned" American the electorate “will be much more disappointed than the“ interpreters ”of the meanings of Russian defensive strategies count. In particular, strategies based on the creation of zones of“ no access. ”I am far from military affairs, but I believe thatfor ANY ENEMY of Russia, there is only ONE ONE way to potentially "hack" Russian access denial zones, without unacceptable damage to oneself. This method is surprisingly simple. The military adversary of Russia, at first, will have to revolve at least its ENTIRE NATIONAL TERRITORY into the "access denial zone". That is, to make it unattainable for the Russian massive response. Fortunately, and for obvious reasons, the solution of this problem does not depend on Russia's military adversary. After all, Russia's defense construction plans are aimed at effectively solving the reverse problem ...
      1. ABC-schütze
        ABC-schütze April 14 2021 12: 47
        +2
        For this, it makes theoretical sense to discuss this new product of overseas conceptual insights, only in the context of a potential military clash between Washington, Beijing and Moscow in "zones of interest" located outside their national territories. Moreover, in situations where the international legal status of their presence there and the legitimacy of power and law and order in the territories of these zones of interest are not clearly defined (as, say, Kosovo or the territory of the former united Ukraine, where, AFTER ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL coup d'etat, there is a civil war). For the presence in the specified zone of interests of one of the parties, in strict accordance with the provisions of international law (such as the presence of the Russian contingent in Syria) and an attempt at a military attack on this contingent, will be perceived by the relevant side as military aggression and the outbreak of war. With all "from this" consequences for the national territory of the enemy ...
  6. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 April 14 2021 07: 19
    0
    Items arrive in the pentagon, on the White House lawn, Andrews Air Force Base, and all these multi-domain forces are attacking.
  7. Eug
    Eug April 14 2021 08: 29
    -1
    A new level of communication and control. But possible only in the absence of effective means of electronic warfare from the enemy. It is interesting to dream up what a failure (even more interesting - hacking) will lead to in the operation of an information and communication system ... as for me, it is easier and more efficient to print bucks and hire conventional barmaley as a manpower that does not require much trouble.
    1. novel66
      novel66 April 14 2021 08: 35
      +2
      possible only in the absence of effective means of electronic warfare from the enemy.

      that's right, one good jammer - and the infantry will again become infantry, who have done nothing from deprivation of everything heaped up, and must simply shoot at the enemy with rifles ... well, and in return receive
      1. seacap
        seacap April 14 2021 12: 17
        +1
        For a start, the Americans, having a traditionally old weapons culture, as a rule, know how and competently use a variety of small arms. For the most part, they have no problems with the management and operation of various machines. The transatlantic ji-ai is legislatively, for the sake of achieving the goal and the fulfillment of the task, not burdened with any moral, ethical and universal human norms, it is a highly professional, motivated, strong and dangerous enemy, very propagandistic and competently psychologically prepared. I would not be so carelessly having fun and dismissively, tb. considering that they always and very purposefully "play long", in contrast to our company, carelessness and, to be honest, the venality of the nobility.
        1. malyvalv
          malyvalv April 14 2021 17: 05
          +2
          not burdened with any moral, ethical and universal norms

          This is their main problem. In the event of a threat to a personal ass, morality will not work and it is not shameful to raise your hands.
  8. Niko
    Niko April 14 2021 10: 51
    -2
    You can, of course, smile. But do not forget the main thing: they are investing in the analysis, modeling, development of various projects enormous efforts and resources. Sooner or later, somewhere there will be results. Does at least some kind of US analytical departments work in Russia?
    1. ABC-schütze
      ABC-schütze April 14 2021 13: 48
      +3
      In Russia, for example, there is such a highly professional analytical structure as the Academy of Military Sciences. Such "living" and fully scientifically developed, relevant documents such as the National Security Strategy and the Military Doctrine of Russia, as can be seen from their text and structure, were not developed without her participation. And, presumably, in Russia this is far from the only analytical structure ... But is it worth listing them in detail "for everyone"? ..
      1. Niko
        Niko April 14 2021 13: 56
        -1
        It is perhaps pointless to list, the question is how efficient they are, given that there is no longer anything to judge about their existence except by their names. PS Haben Sie interessante Name winked
        1. ABC-schütze
          ABC-schütze April 14 2021 14: 29
          +2
          The article under discussion does not say anything about my "interesting" name. In my response to your question, in the context of the aforementioned AVN, quite specific, valid doctrinal documents are indicated. Specifically, in practice, implemented in the Russian national security and defense policy (and foreign policy too ...). For this, your doubts about their "performance", you should somehow, clearly substantiate ...
          1. Niko
            Niko April 14 2021 14: 59
            -2
            Quote: ABC-schütze
            The article under discussion does not say anything about my "interesting" name. In my response to your question, in the context of the aforementioned AVN, quite specific, valid doctrinal documents are indicated. Specifically, in practice, implemented in the Russian national security and defense policy (and foreign policy too ...). For this, your doubts about their "performance", you should somehow, clearly substantiate ...

            Well, I'm glad that YOU are doing well with analytics, etc. But what then should a minister go across half of the country to a construction site to pay attention to the fact that something is not going according to plan?
            1. ABC-schütze
              ABC-schütze April 14 2021 20: 30
              +2
              I will continue to delight you further ... The fact is that AVN, in the context of analytics, does not have its task to monitor the order at construction sites and construction schedules. This is precisely one of the direct tasks of the executive branch. To whom the aforementioned "minister" with his apparatus also belongs. By the way, observing the movements (inspection trips) of the minister is difficult to classify as analytical exercises of a conceptual nature. For this, my question about the reasons for your "doubts" regarding the doctrinal documents I have named, remained without a clear answer ...
        2. ABC-schütze
          ABC-schütze April 14 2021 14: 32
          0
          By the way, are you all right with the cases in "Vaterlandskiy"? .. "Haben" requires Accusative and acc. endings in the definition to noun. "Name" (NIK) (masculine) ...
          1. Niko
            Niko April 14 2021 15: 08
            0
            Quote: ABC-schütze
            By the way, are you all right with the cases in "Vaterlandskiy"? .. "Haben" requires Accusative and acc. endings in the definition to noun. "Name" (NIK) (masculine) ...

            Yes, you are in the German special, not like me. True, I can't remember a single case when the word Schütze is written with a small letter, but this is probably because the language is certainly not my native one laughing
            1. ABC-schütze
              ABC-schütze April 14 2021 20: 37
              +1
              Aha ... Only, in my case, "Schütze" is not a separate "word", but a part of a noun (common noun), which is preceded by an abbreviation. If you remind me of the rules for writing "Vaterlandsky" abbreviations, I will be grateful. The grammar and spelling in it changed many times. Moreover, this nickname was presented to me by a classmate living in Dresden ...
              1. Niko
                Niko April 14 2021 21: 36
                0
                Quote: ABC-schütze
                Aha ... Only, in my case, "Schütze" is not a separate "word", but a part of a noun (common noun), which is preceded by an abbreviation. If you remind me of the rules for writing "Vaterlandsky" abbreviations, I will be grateful. The grammar and spelling in it changed many times. Moreover, this nickname was presented to me by a classmate living in Dresden ...

                I didn't want to say anything bad, just if you write with a hyphen - with a big one (you could have done it without me, just enter it in Google)
                1. ABC-schütze
                  ABC-schütze April 15 2021 11: 32
                  +2
                  And I didn't think anything bad. Simply, if you look closely at the semantic load of the common noun under discussion, it will become clear that it is precisely "such" spelling that corresponds to it in the most optimal form. If you, seriously, took (or took?) "For dictionaries", then you could remind me that the characters "B" and "C" in the orthodox spelling are also lowercase, not uppercase. So, I generously forgive myself for logical and natural student flaws. The teacher understands me that way. And if I decide to become a philologist, I will improve ...
              2. Niko
                Niko April 14 2021 21: 43
                -1
                Quote: ABC-schütze
                Aha ... Only, in my case, "Schütze" is not a separate "word", but a part of a noun (common noun), which is preceded by an abbreviation. If you remind me of the rules for writing "Vaterlandsky" abbreviations, I will be grateful. The grammar and spelling in it changed many times. Moreover, this nickname was presented to me by a classmate living in Dresden ...

              3. Niko
                Niko April 14 2021 22: 02
                -1
                Quote: ABC-schütze
                Aha ... Only, in my case, "Schütze" is not a separate "word", but a part of a noun (common noun), which is preceded by an abbreviation. If you remind me of the rules for writing "Vaterlandsky" abbreviations, I will be grateful. The grammar and spelling in it changed many times. Moreover, this nickname was presented to me by a classmate living in Dresden ...

                Well, if your "classmate" who lived in Dresden worked there at the GB and now moved to Moscow, your desire to protect "analytics" the absence of which (or its quality) is obvious to everyone who has eyes and a brain, it is quite understandable - this is personal (by the way, they are not surprising and his mistakes in German)
                1. ABC-schütze
                  ABC-schütze April 15 2021 11: 37
                  +1
                  Well, if the "analytics" that suits you is generated by fortunetellers like Friedman's STRATFOR working for the interests of the State Department, the CIA or the Pentagon, your "skepticism" about the Russian AVN does not surprise me at all ...
                2. ABC-schütze
                  ABC-schütze April 15 2021 11: 43
                  +1
                  In the context of the aforementioned "obviousness of absence", I suggest once again that you can state your intelligible claims, say, to the simplest section of the RLS of Russia - "The chapter" The position of Russia in the modern world ", with an explanation of the reasons for its textual and semantic" evolution "from the first (2O2o) to the current edition ...
      2. seacap
        seacap April 14 2021 16: 35
        -3
        This structure has practically been destroyed, and deliberately, in the course of the recent "reforms" (analogous to liquidation) carried out by the "furniture production manager" for some reason, became a MO, under the "roof" of the guarantor, this person is currently carrying out similar "reforms" of the aviation industry. complex, therefore, during our lifetime, the national aviation industry "does not threaten" us.
  9. novel66
    novel66 April 14 2021 12: 00
    -1
    Kolya hi , forgot about the lace panties
  10. Whisper
    Whisper April 14 2021 12: 18
    0
    Americans are doing everything right. Only technological superiority, this is the solution in the case of Russia. It is necessary not only to conquer it, but also to keep it. Plus nuclear weapons, which will definitely fly. All this is more like pumping a hero who will die anyway.
  11. abrakadabre
    abrakadabre April 14 2021 13: 16
    +1
    The American salvation in this situation is multi-domain (multi-sphere) ground forces capable of coordinating their actions with the aviation, navy, space group and cyber units.
    That is, multi-domain forces do not include all of the above types of troops? And who are they who remain with us? Ahhh ... the infantry ... and the whip force. Why then invent clever domain terms?
    And then, didn't they have such a structure like our General Staff? Which should plan operations with the interaction of combat arms. Yes, it seems until now was and is. Why then this verbal husk?
  12. m.voron
    m.voron April 14 2021 13: 46
    -6
    "Russia and China" - most articles indicate such a link (this only applies to sites (.ru) on Chinese sites you will not find such a link). I don’t understand what has China to do with it? China is doing well, it has never been an ally of Russia and never will be, it is also doing well with America by the end of 2020, Chinese exports to the United States increased by 7,9%, to $ 451,81 billion. Imports of American products increased by 9,8%, to $ 134,91 billion, a total of 586,92 billion. With Russia at the end of the same 2020. decreased by 2,9% compared to last year and amounted to 107,76 billion dollars (data from the main customs administration of the PRC) i.e. 5 times less. The only thing that Russia is useful for China is its cheap resources and land which part of it was donated, part of it was leased for "3 kopecks." forever and ever.
  13. lopvlad
    lopvlad April 14 2021 19: 29
    0
    Hacking the "no access zone"


    the main thing is that when you break into someone's access denial zone, make sure that you are not hacked at this time.

    One such company RAND held in September last year, when the latest robotic units of the United States and frankly outdated Russian troops fought in a virtual battle.


    these are not the same Russian troops in which hypersonic weapons are already in service, unlike the American troops. They are always trying to accuse us of hats, and they themselves have such hats that do not cry + deceitful ideas. So SDI they have a Death Star in Earth orbit build. Now here are the multi-domain forces.
    And the most important thing in their concept is that while their opponents build it, their armed forces and tools to counter their ideas should not be developed.
  14. yehat2
    yehat2 April 15 2021 17: 23
    -1
    Quote: Nyrobsky
    Here people will go FOR THE HOMELAND.

    it goes away very quickly.
    example - the USA and the USSR. In the United States, they began to tighten the nuts about 7 years after the end of the war.
    in the USSR, too, after Khrushchev's coup, 7 years later, they gradually began to move people away from the provision of the state and canceled plans to reduce the working week and improve the socialization of citizens.
  15. Eroma
    Eroma April 15 2021 18: 24
    0
    In short, the Yankees do not want to invent a new tank! We decided to come up with a war without tanks bully especially interesting air defense capable of reflecting art raid, smacks of energy shields or distortions of gravity lol there is not enough money to fight off shells with rockets
  16. Kazimir Prutikov
    Kazimir Prutikov April 16 2021 13: 19
    0
    Ideally, of course, both us and the Americans would like to create units equipped with the latest technology, which, if necessary, could in real time cause fire or attack by any means - from the ground, from the air, from space, in real space or in cyberspace. But how to determine those objects that need to be hit? If nothing flies either in the air or in space, then only a soldier who has penetrated the enemy's territory can detect something on the ground. Therefore, the war must acquire a semi-partisan character. The main actor is special forces, capable of penetrating, finding and correcting further actions of the main forces. In a future war, if you stay in one place for more than a couple of hours, you can become dead.
  17. 1536
    1536 April 16 2021 20: 52
    0
    After reading about the plans of the Americans to destroy everyone around them, one can only draw one conclusion: the Americans live in the past, they have the psychology of cannibalistic savages.
  18. Old school
    Old school April 18 2021 18: 07
    0
    Oh, Marvel addicts are registered in the pentogon ...
  19. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 13 May 2021 08: 29
    0
    Most importantly, Western countries must clearly understand that during an attack (local) it will fly to launch points and to carriers and headquarters nearby ....... the destruction of our air defense is a matter of technology and their losses.