Military Review

By the end of the year, the fifth regiment C-400 will appear in the army.

59
By the end of the year, the fifth regiment C-400 will appear in the army.The aerospace defense forces are preparing to adopt the next regimental anti-aircraft missile systems C-400.

According to the Almaz-Antey State Specialty Design Bureau, which produces this weapon, the transfer to the military of a new batch of air defense systems should take place before the end of this year. If force majeure circumstances do not intervene in the plans of industrialists, within four months, five Regiments of Triumph will cover the sky over Russia. In the meantime, four such units carry combat duty. Two of them are located north and east of Moscow, one each - in the Kaliningrad region and in the Far East.

Although a reliable cover of the capital sky remains the most important function of the Armed Forces, the Defense Ministry decided that the anti-aircraft arsenal should be updated in other Russian regions. A few months ago, Commander-in-Chief of the Air Force Viktor Bondarev explained how this year they will carry out this task with reference to the "400". According to the general, in 2012, the C-400 military fleet will increase by three divisions. One military has already been transported to Nakhodka. The second decided to put in the suburbs. Another one is in the 1-th command of the Air Force and Air Defense.

Simply put, the geography of the combat duty of new missiles is expanding to the East and North-West Russia. As for the protection of the airspace around Moscow, the “fresh” division was reinforced by the C-400 regiments already in Dmitrov and Elektrostal.

What kind of weapon is this can be judged by the results of its tests at the Ashuluk and Kapustin Yar test sites in the Astrakhan Region. The complex, nicknamed Growler in the West - "Growler", managed one missile to hit a target flying at a speed of 2800 meters per second, and the other to reach an object at an altitude of 56 kilometers. The combat characteristics of "Triumph" is really impressive. At the same time, no other air defense system is capable of working on several targets within a radius of 400 kilometers. It is no coincidence that C-400 show an increased interest abroad, especially in China. But the designers of "Triumph" achieve more. The Almaz-Antey Air Defense Concern is now completing state tests of a new missile for the C-400, which will operate in the near space.

In fact, this system can use at least seven missile options. Three of them - 48Н6Е, 48Н6Е2 and 48Н6Е3 - are suitable for combat shooting from both the 400 and the advanced C-300М. The ammunition with the designation 48H6DM specially modified under the "Triumph". Missile control is based on the principle of semi-active radar homing with correction. The industry is preparing to release two more ammunition - 9М96Е and 9М96Е2. It uses active radar homing. But the range of these missiles is only for 135 kilometers.

In mid-February, it became known that a long-range anti-aircraft guided missile was developed for the C-400 system with the possibility of hitting targets at a distance of more than 250 kilometers. The arrival of the troops of its first production models is expected at the end of this year.

As for the Moscow air defense zone, more than two dozen modern Pantsir-С1 anti-aircraft missile-cannon complexes are deployed there. Calculations for them have already been prepared at the Air Defense Training Center in Gatchina. They will be in combat duty together with the four-hundred divisions and at the same time cover them. Thus, the security of the capital sky will be provided by a mixed grouping of long-range combat weapons - more than 200 kilometers - and the closest - to 20 kilometers - actions.

The leaders of the Defense Ministry are confident that with the C-300 and C-400 systems, the Pantsiri rocket-gun cannon, and the C-500 complex in the future, the country's aerospace defense will receive a multi-functional echeloned zone ring cover system for the city. Moreover, this system will be able to protect Moscow even from attacks from orbit.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.rg.ru/
59 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. esaul
    esaul 27 August 2012 09: 48
    +19
    Wow !!! This is gaining momentum! Wow! That's when 500-ki will be released in a series, then in general, the basurman will go to bile.
    Well, that’s where they belong.
    1. Uncle Serozha
      Uncle Serozha 27 August 2012 12: 35
      +24
      Quote: esaul
      Wow !!! This is gaining momentum! Wow!

      Under Yeltsin, the Moscow Avangard plant (our main manufacturer of anti-aircraft missiles) produced ... 2 missiles a year.
      Now - 2 rockets per day. Comments, as they say, are unnecessary. It is this simple fact that easily refutes the argument that GDP is a protege of the world oligarchy.
      Yes, I also have a lot of claims to the ruling authorities in terms of ensuring the rule of law and combating theft and bribery, but you cannot want everything now. Moscow was not built in a day. As, by the way, and "Vanguard" ...
      1. Pimply
        Pimply 27 August 2012 16: 42
        -2
        Under Yeltsin, the price of Brent crude fluctuated between $ 18 and $ 20. When he leaves - 30 bucks. Considering the fact that Russian oil is worse in quality than Brent and is cheaper - are you very surprised at two missiles a year? This is despite the fact that the main content of the budget is raw materials.
        1. Don
          Don 27 August 2012 16: 47
          +2
          Quote: Pimply
          Under Yeltsin, the price of Brent crude fluctuated between $ 18 and $ 20.

          What does oil have to do with rocket production? All oil in the Russian Federation is produced by the state? No. Private companies. The main budget revenues from the sale of oil? No. From customs duties and VAT. So do not tell tales.
        2. crazyrom
          crazyrom 28 August 2012 00: 09
          +1
          Quote: Pimply
          Under Yeltsin, the price of Brent crude fluctuated between $ 18 and $ 20.


          What difference does it make if under the "production sharing agreement" we didn’t get a dime from this oil at all? And they were paid extra for the fact that they extract our oil? And Putin introduced the severance tax, so at least a percentage went from oil, here you have 2 missiles a day.
      2. esaul
        esaul 27 August 2012 19: 35
        +5
        Quote: Uncle Seryozha
        Under Yeltsin, the Moscow Avangard plant (our main manufacturer of anti-aircraft missiles) produced ... 2 missiles a year. Now - 2 rockets a day. Comments, as they say, are unnecessary


        Sergey, welcome. Commentary - direct - in the eye! Briefly, intelligibly. Who does not understand - you can repeat ... Plus, a colleague!
      3. amikan
        amikan 27 August 2012 21: 08
        +3
        I absolutely agree with you. A complete coincidence of our views. There are a lot of questions regarding GDP, but in the main I support it. If it weren’t for him, Russia would have been dismembered a long time ago
      4. crazyrom
        crazyrom 28 August 2012 00: 10
        +2
        Quote: Uncle Seryozha
        Now - 2 rockets per day


        Very good! I would like to congratulate my comrades ...
    2. alexng
      alexng 27 August 2012 13: 37
      0
      This phrase can be attributed to the S-400 complex and to the troll meat, only the concepts are different: - "What a different grumbler." In the first case - one hundred percent hitting the target, and in the second, the "byakomet" was trolled.
    3. Bashkaus
      Bashkaus 27 August 2012 16: 17
      +5
      And what is the turnover here? excuse me, but it was already written about this on copper. Honestly, it is annoying when the same topic is talked about every week and due to this they create the appearance of "colossal turns" Yes, there are no turns. Since last year it was known that only two regiments would be delivered. A lot or a little is another question, but two are also good. One has been installed, the second is not yet. Two regiments a year, no more, no less. When they put the second one, then we will rejoice that the plan has been fulfilled, but for now one verbiage (((
    4. Tatanka Yotanka
      Tatanka Yotanka 27 August 2012 22: 09
      +3
      Saw the plant on the S-300, S-400
      1. lotus04
        lotus04 28 August 2012 04: 17
        +2
        Quote: Tatanka Yotanka
        Saw the plant on the S-300, S-400


        Urrrryayayaya! Glory to Russia! Glory to the Great Tandem Putin Mandate - Medvedev !!! You are on the right path - comrades! (audience rises, thunderous applause)
    5. Mr. Truth
      Mr. Truth 28 August 2012 00: 31
      0
      OShS ZRP you do not have these comrade?
  2. klimpopov
    klimpopov 27 August 2012 09: 58
    +12
    Although reliable cover of the capital’s sky remains the most important function of the Armed Forces, the Ministry of Defense decided that the anti-aircraft arsenal should be updated in other Russian regions.

    Oh, really? Yes, you don’t worry about us, first cover Moscow, we’ll stretch it out somehow.
    1. ward
      ward 27 August 2012 12: 55
      +7
      Yes, in extreme cases, we have umbrellas ... and if it doesn’t help ... from the instructions to the civilian population ... in case of atomic bombing, wrap yourself in a sheet and crawl to the nearest cemetery ... and why in Russia they treat Moscow like that .. .plus Hipolyte ...
      1. Uncle Serozha
        Uncle Serozha 27 August 2012 13: 15
        +8
        Quote: ward
        and why in Russia they treat Moscow like that ...

        It is also not clear to me. And this despite the fact that I am a native Muscovite. Moreover, such an attitude harms primarily Moscow itself. She turned into some kind of Mecca for lovers of easy money.
        But I remember a completely different Moscow - the city of my youth. Moscow workers, engineers and scientists. The "Transmash" plant where I worked before the army (now - an office complex ... @ # ^ & ~ mother!), My own ANTK im. Tupolev, where I came after college (now - an office complex. "Tupolev Plaza" ... @ # ^ & ~ mother!).
        But I very much hope that we will take our streets back. These .. @ # ^ & ~
        1. klimpopov
          klimpopov 27 August 2012 13: 33
          +4
          Remember Uncle Serezha, like Bulgakov’s, the Housing problem spoiled the Muscovites, although to be honest, I really love Moscow, especially Chistye and Bulgakov’s museum and there’s nothing to list. And having read Gilyarovsky separately in the second year of college, I went for a walk ...
          It would be more rational to intercept on distant approaches.
          1. Uncle Serozha
            Uncle Serozha 27 August 2012 13: 48
            +7
            Quote: klimpopov
            It was more rational to intercept at distant approaches.

            Yes, it seems so - at least for aerodynamic purposes (with ballistic more difficult); But perhaps the builders of the current air defense system proceeded from the same logic as in Soviet times. And she was like that.
            In a large-scale conflict, Moscow is a Scandal in any situation. The only question is whether the managing structures and staffs will have time to issue all the command and commands for a retaliatory strike and mobilization.
            It was according to this logic that the A-35M missile defense system of Moscow was built. Under the agreement, both we and they could cover only one object and have only 16 interceptor missiles. They covered the ICBM positions with their Safeguard, and we covered Moscow (our ICBM positions were dispersed over a vast territory and were hardly vulnerable).
            In the event of a comic strike, 16 interceptors of the A-35M system (subsequently A-135) provided a gain in the life of Moscow of about 7-8 minutes. Yes, plus that - they demanded additional enemy missiles that would otherwise go to other cities. And just these extra minutes were enough to make a decision on the answer. strike and operation of all ACS.
            After that, Nerezinovaya turned into the largest cemetery in the world, but ... a copper basin inevitably covered our best friends.
            1. klimpopov
              klimpopov 27 August 2012 13: 59
              +2
              I thought that at the time of signing the treaty on pro, they allowed each other to cover one district of IMHO. It is clear that they are unlikely to throw a bomb on Stanitsa Barsukovskaya.
              1. Uncle Serozha
                Uncle Serozha 27 August 2012 14: 07
                +1
                Quote: klimpopov
                I thought that at the time of signing the treaty on pro, they allowed each other to cover one district of IMHO.

                Well, yes, I put it incorrectly. It is the area. Well, we covered the MPR (Moscow industrial region), and they - the area of ​​launch mines in the north. Dakota.
                1. klimpopov
                  klimpopov 27 August 2012 14: 27
                  0
                  Well, in principle, it is logical, but that contract is no longer relevant. Therefore, it is necessary not only to deploy a missile defense system in Russia.
            2. v53993
              v53993 28 August 2012 05: 42
              0
              Considering the remoteness of the ground grouping of the BR from the intended goals, which means increased flight time for them, I would like to pay more attention to the underwater component of the nuclear weapon.
    2. Civil
      Civil 27 August 2012 14: 06
      +1
      ABM of the rest of Russia will be only zonal means
    3. Don
      Don 27 August 2012 16: 49
      0
      Quote: klimpopov
      Yes, you don’t worry about us, first cover Moscow, we’ll stretch it out somehow.

      Moscow is an important transportation hub. He was better covered than under the Soviet Union.
  3. anchonsha
    anchonsha 27 August 2012 10: 17
    +7
    Some sediment remains ... THIS IS BECAUSE OF THIS EXTRACT FROM THE ARTICLE ". The air and space defense of the country will receive a multifunctional layered zonal ring system to cover the city. Moreover, this system will be able to protect Moscow even from strikes from orbit."
    Although, of course, where will the bombs be thrown first of all by amers (and they have already proved their aggressive soul, why doubt it) ???? Not to Oryol, Kursk and Belgorod, but to Moscow, of course ... And anyway, that sediment ...
  4. rock09
    rock09 27 August 2012 10: 35
    +2
    WE are invincible
  5. strannik595
    strannik595 27 August 2012 10: 43
    0
    only nevertheless it is more pleasant to read the verb "will appear", "expanded" not in the future, but in the present tense wink otherwise they like to start for health, and end for peace
    1. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 27 August 2012 15: 54
      +1
      Deployed 4 shelf C-400
      The elections have passed, so I think these are not empty promises
      1. skullcap
        skullcap 27 August 2012 16: 48
        +1
        Deployed 4 shelf C-400
        The news is undoubtedly good. But who can say how many such regiments we need for complete happiness. Everyone, including Moscow.
        1. Mr. Truth
          Mr. Truth 28 August 2012 00: 33
          +1
          skullcap,
          The air defense forces now have about 30 regiments, some not even S-300s, but Bukami armed. In Warfare.ru infa is.
  6. lonshakovpetr
    lonshakovpetr 27 August 2012 10: 44
    +1
    Now the main thing is to continue in the same spirit ...
  7. SSR
    SSR 27 August 2012 10: 52
    +1
    "Grunt", managed to shoot down a target flying at a speed of 2800 meters per second with one missile,

    Uh, it’s breathtaking .. is this true or an eyepiece?
    Just don’t say that a little mistake .. I’m upset (((
    1. Stealth
      Stealth 27 August 2012 13: 31
      +10
      True, this is also the data for the 48E3 missile from the S-300PM2, and the new 40N6 missile created specifically for the S-400 will intercept targets at a speed of up to 4800 m / s. So sleep well and read about testing hypersonic missiles with a smile. They have not yet appeared, and we can already intercept them wink
      1. Andrew
        Andrew 27 August 2012 15: 16
        0
        And which missile has a range of 400 km.
        1. PLO
          PLO 27 August 2012 15: 37
          +4
          48E3 from S-300PM2

          48N6E3 this export modification of the 48N6DM rocket from S-300PM2
          and s-300PMU2 export version of S-300PM2

          And which missile has a range of 400 km.

          40Н6
          reach height 185km
          1. de_monSher
            de_monSher 27 August 2012 17: 17
            0
            Ummmmmm ... sorry, can I have a link more detailed on the 40N6 rocket? About reach in height of 185 km. Just, as far as I remember, it will be a little higher than the ionosphere. And if she flies there, and even controllable, then this is wonderful.

            Well, and so, even if there is already 56 km of altitude stated in the article, it is already there, it's just - great ...
            1. PLO
              PLO 27 August 2012 18: 22
              0
              I first heard about this rocket in the profile forum of the air base, the same characteristics flickered in many other articles
              use google and you will find many links, including on this site

              in general, with a range of 400 km, an altitude of 185 km looks quite logical
              1. Stealth
                Stealth 27 August 2012 19: 33
                +1
                Quote: olp
                in general, with a range of 400 km, an altitude of 185 km looks quite logical

                Well, yes, the American SM-3 can hit targets at an altitude of 250km, with a range of 500km. So everything is all right.
                1. de_monSher
                  de_monSher 27 August 2012 21: 11
                  +1
                  About SM 3, no one says that it is bad ... I, in any case, - the language will not turn so to speak.

                  Another thing is the very specific interception of an American satellite by this rocket - they give rise to a lot of questions regarding the missile control systems. It's one thing to control a rocket along the entire trajectory, another thing is 50-100 orbits, watch the downed object, and then blast the blank along a ballistic trajectory and report that "we're cool! We don't need drugs!" Do you understand what I mean?
                  1. Gemar
                    Gemar 28 August 2012 07: 07
                    -1
                    Jan 19 - RIA Novosti, Alexey Berezin. China has successfully tested a medium-range ballistic missile, shooting down a space satellite. According to CNN, citing sources in the US National Security Council, the tests were conducted on January 11. The rocket shot down an old Chinese meteorological satellite, which was in orbit 864 kilometers from Earth.
                    The Chinese, knowing the orbit and speed of movement, knocked down their satellite FOURTH TIME laughing .
                    The Americans, having shot down their satellite, wanted to demonstrate to China and the world that the United States would have a "more advanced" guidance system. That they are ready to defend their satellite constellation and, if anything, will not miss, like some ...
                    Both those and others are creatures angry !!! They dirtied space with their "show-offs" (how many debris fly in space?). Maybe we need to shoot down something with the help of the future S-500 too? Like, they dirtied everywhere, well, they dirtied everywhere! ABOUT! Here they have not dirtied yet ... Right now we will fix it! Now they have definitely dirtied everywhere ...
                    1. Vanek
                      Vanek 28 August 2012 07: 26
                      0
                      Quote: Gamar
                      Maybe we need to bring down something with the help of the future S-500?


                      Another American satellite laughing
  8. Tog026
    Tog026 27 August 2012 11: 11
    0
    The Almaz-Antey air defense concern is now completing state tests of a new missile for the S-400, which will operate in near space good - this is really breathtaking !!!
  9. scrack
    scrack 27 August 2012 11: 40
    0
    About 5 years later, God willing, the S-500s go, then we will have the most impenetrable air defense system in the world. And there, you look, and we will help allies
  10. toguns
    toguns 27 August 2012 11: 44
    +2
    drinks 5 regiments S-400 is already a matter, I would like to know the marine development of this complex is underway ???
    1. leon-iv
      leon-iv 27 August 2012 12: 22
      +1
      Yes, but so far the emphasis has been placed on upgrading the S-300F.
      S-400F will be on new destroyers. It will be possible to replace cruisers.
  11. bachast
    bachast 27 August 2012 12: 39
    +5
    It is capable of detecting a target at a distance of six hundred kilometers, and within a radius of four hundred it is already ready to fire. This is about five times more than the western counterpart - the Patriot complex
    1. viktor_ui
      viktor_ui 27 August 2012 13: 45
      0
      bachast - "This is about five times more than the Western analogue - the Patriot complex" ... exactly an analogue, and then I was a Chinese Mandarin and concurrently also the Chancellor of Germany wassat
      1. F117
        F117 27 August 2012 20: 31
        0
        You're right. The S-300 already surpassed the Patriot in characteristics and capabilities, and the S-400 and, soon, the S-500 have no analogues in the world. So with the proper development of these systems in Russia, by 2020 the Americans will be able to shove their missile defense system to hell
  12. patsantre
    patsantre 27 August 2012 12: 50
    +3
    It seems to me, or exactly the same news was a few days ago?
  13. Bandera
    Bandera 27 August 2012 14: 01
    +17
    It’s good that Russia is alive, that it invents and builds.
    It is not good that the Ukrainian media is sculpting from Russia such a greedy monster, with a face crushed from oil and a stomach swollen from gas.
    At the same time, in the western regions of Ukraine "Plast" is being revived, such are the boy scouts of modern times. Eastern oblasts accept Russian as regional. Forgotten the history of Suvorov. We have repaired the Zaporozhye iron caput to get out of the way. My friends go to Moscow for a construction site. Azarov talks about the increase in population. About 6,5 million Ukrainians work abroad, they create a surplus of the trade balance. An army is like a ghost, ready to defend only against ghosts.
    Oh, what am I talking about? Oh yes, about your sore point.
    Russians, remember that it is not politicians, not the media that strengthen our friendship. And your attitude to the guest worker who makes repairs in your apartment. Attitude of your policeman police officer to Mikola at the Kiev station. Your attitude and behavior on vacation in Crimea, Lvov, Kiev and other parts of Ukraine. Your attitude on public transport when you hear a conversation with an ear-cutting accent and don't say "come in large numbers here", but just keep silent or even smile ..
    1. 101
      101 27 August 2012 18: 10
      +2
      Bandera Moscow is far and probably not quite Russia. If I need a passport, I’ll have to look for it in boxes. Nobody will stop and ask us, come safely
    2. amikan
      amikan 27 August 2012 21: 21
      +1
      I always treated you like I treated my brothers. Of course, I felt chilled when your media in the Russian Federation poured it on, but I hoped that the people would be clever. Nobody would fill Russia together with Ukraine and Belarus
  14. erased
    erased 27 August 2012 17: 58
    +3
    Good news, but is Moscow the whole country?
  15. bask
    bask 27 August 2012 18: 38
    0
    It’s good, of course, that at least technologists have not been lost here. Without the production of high-tech weapons, we’ll get pipets Yes, it’s good to restore the coverage area throughout the whole territory of Russia. Double north cord doesn’t have anything at all and south. asians host ...
  16. sxn278619
    sxn278619 27 August 2012 18: 45
    0
    All the same, it is not clear. The earth is round. I read somewhere that a locator standing on a ship can detect another ship reliably over a distance of more than 180 km. This is the problem for a PRK with a range of 500 km. Those. Locator C-400 Visibility cone. At a range of 400 km, he sees AWACS flying at an altitude of 10 km. All that flies lower at this range, he does not see - the dead zone. This means that external target designation and tracking are necessary. (I.e., for these purposes it is not autonomous). And have self-guidance in the final stretch.
  17. nycsson
    nycsson 27 August 2012 19: 25
    +1
    Quickly restore everything that was destroyed! Entire air defense districts were!
  18. Rossmk
    Rossmk 27 August 2012 19: 46
    +3
    It seems to me, or was this news already on the site?
  19. sxn278619
    sxn278619 27 August 2012 20: 50
    0
    Why Moscow should cover the S-400. They will not save from blocks of strategic missiles. A war with NATO can only be nuclear. Therefore, everything should be sent to the border with China under the slogan of protection against DPRK launches. Chinese medium-range missiles are their goal.
    1. Gemar
      Gemar 28 August 2012 07: 28
      0
      Quote: sxn278619
      S-400. They will not save from blocks of strategic missiles.

      S-400 is replacing the S-300 \ 200, and they were not originally designed to shoot down strategic missiles of the Americans (we destroyed all short and medium-range missiles with them). Therefore, the S-400 is needed everywhere! From blocks of strategic missiles (intercontinental) will save only the A-135. Therefore, the S-500 (and not just the S-400) should be sent to the borders with Europe and China (here I agree with you). Medium-range missiles S-400 is also not a fact that will bring down. But it can bring down short-range missiles and cruise missiles, plus various aircraft. Then the S-500 will come to the rescue, which I really hope will be better than the SM-3 both in terms of interception range and height. So it is necessary to place it on the border of states possessing short- and medium-range missiles.
      GLORY TO RUSSIA!
  20. bremest
    bremest 27 August 2012 21: 25
    +1
    It's a good news. The main thing is that both complexes and missiles continue to be improved and come out on medium-range hypersonic rockets.
  21. v53993
    v53993 27 August 2012 21: 40
    0
    Good news. But it is necessary not only to patch the shield, but also to forge the sword.
    1. Rossmk
      Rossmk 27 August 2012 21: 59
      0
      The sword is forged and very impressive. YaRS (RS-24) and Bulava (RS-30), in your opinion, why should we?)) I don’t mention the planned development of a heavy liquid-fuel ICBM, which will replace Satan in the future.
      1. v53993
        v53993 28 August 2012 05: 05
        0
        Forgets somehow sluggishly, more conversations.
        1. Rossmk
          Rossmk 28 August 2012 10: 28
          0
          Well, at least somehow forged. Better than nothing.
  22. Tatanka Yotanka
    Tatanka Yotanka 27 August 2012 22: 00
    0
    Saw a factory on S-300, S-400 can someone refute something?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_c_5TSD7JM&feature=player_embedded
  23. Rink
    Rink 27 August 2012 22: 37
    0
    The complex, nicknamed in the West Growler - "Grunt", managed to shoot down a target flying at a speed of 2800 meters per second with one missile, and with the other - to reach an object at an altitude of 56 kilometers.


    Is 2800m / s something about eight Machs? (if at the surface, at a height it is even more). Interestingly, what kind of target did he have such a ballistic head? somehow somehow nothing comes to mind ...

    Impressive of course.
    Americans with their hypersonic efforts (X51 Waverider and the second project - I do not remember the abbreviation) - warm greetings!
  24. suharev-52
    suharev-52 27 August 2012 23: 43
    +4
    Hooray. So the third regiment intervenes to guard the Moscow liberals and swamp hamsters intercedes. And God forbid that something will fly over their heads when the West decides to hit the Russians. They are the rest of Russia ... us. If only it didn’t hit them. To the best of our knowledge, the Pentagon has identified 12 critical targets in Russia that will be dealt a preemptive strike. And Moscow is not on this list. And I live next to one of the goals. So I’ll go dig a bomb shelter. Perhaps useful. Sincerely.
    1. bachast
      bachast 28 August 2012 07: 40
      0
      As far as we know from available information, the Pentagon has identified 12 most important goals in Russia

      Maybe 12. Here’s the version about the plans of 1945. More than 60 goals, the most important are Moscow, Baku, Novosibirsk, Gorky, Sverdlovsk, Chelyabinsk, Omsk, Kuibyshev, Kazan, Saratov, Molotov, Magnitogorsk, Grozny, Novokuznetsk and Nizhny Tagil