Tikhanovskaya complained about the freezing of her accounts in Belarus

Former presidential candidate of Belarus Svetlana Tikhanovskaya complained about the economic sanctions imposed on her by the “Belarusian regime”. According to Tikhanovskaya, her bank accounts were blocked in Belarus. It is noted that the account in Belarusbank was blocked in particular.

Tikhanovskaya writes in her Telegram channel that this “made it impossible to receive a social pension for a disabled child - 223 Belarusian rubles”.

Earlier, the Belarusian authorities took certain measures against Tikhanovskaya, who is conducting open anti-state and anti-national activities outside the republic. In particular, for Tikhanovskaya's calls to Western countries to impose new anti-Belarusian sanctions and for inciting citizens of the Republic of Belarus to protests and clashes with law enforcement officers, she was included in the list of persons involved in terrorist actions and their preparation. Together with Tikhanovskaya, who is in Lithuania and calls herself “the Belarusian national leader”, this list includes several of her comrades-in-arms who enjoy foreign support.

In Belarus itself, commenting on the claims of Tikhanovskaya, they note that for some reason she did not care about other citizens of the country who also receive various benefits to their accounts when she called on the West to toughen sanctions against Belarus, including against Belarusian banks.

Comments

[tralflot1832]

There hasn't been a month, so let's have fun !!!

[Installer]

The Lithuanian cutlets ran out.

[Pravodel]

Lithuanian cutlets run out

Maybe it's over, but, I suppose, the minced meat is rotten and even rats can't wind cutlets out of it ...

[Vend]

And what did she expect after the criminal case was instituted? Ministerial pension? Everything is as it should be. These are no longer toys, they are reality.

[tralflot1832]

For this month, she didn’t say that, if my father gives it to me, I will have a direct tunnel from Sochi to Antarctica, I have not seen pingins.

[Vladimir Mashkov]

She is strange, Juanita: a collaborationist, a traitor, a criminal who opposes Belarus while hiding abroad. And suddenly - she was offended and complained. Come back, they'll figure it out! The guilty will be punished and imprisoned !:

[Tatyana]

And when did Tikhanovskaya's child become disabled?
Something mother Tikhanovskaya never even stuttered about any disability in her child!

[Vladimir Mashkov]

Quote: Tatiana

And when did Tikhanovskaya's child become disabled?
Something mother Tikhanovskaya never even stuttered about any disability in her child!

Tikhanovskaya has a son (eldest) and a daughter. My son really has hearing problems.

[Tatyana]

Quote: Vladimir Mashkov

Tikhanovskaya has a son (eldest) and a daughter. My son really has hearing problems.

Well, then Tikhanovskaya is a "good" mother!
She is simply able to spit into a well from which she drinks water! Her clever curators in the West and at their own expense will certainly take note of this about Tikhanovskaya.

[76rtbr]

honestly, I forgot it already, surfaced!

[Russobel]

honestly, I forgot it already, surfaced!

Yes, "it", in principle, did not sink ...

[Reserve buildbat]

It is immediately clear that she studied in the same place as our liberda. Those, too, are very concerned about their rights, but they are against the fact that someone else has the same rights.

[Olgovich]

Quote: Stroibat stock

It is immediately clear that she studied in the same place as our liberda.

she called for terror (blocking the roads), but she takes offense ... for the cards ...

[Antidote]

She called for fair elections, but the blue fingers, clinging to the throne, do not want to unclench voluntarily.

[Xnumx vis]

Biden's blue fingers? Silent Cell Lights? Where are you and what about? Z kryzhopelsky district yon tirnopil region svidoukriya ?????

[Olgovich]

Quote: Antidote

She called for fair elections

she called for terror, which is the blocking of railways, access roads and highways.

And no noble goals can justify this.

And her call for a general strike failed, which means that not everyone wants her.

[Roma 1977]

Let's put it this way: much more people want Lukashenko's displacement than Lukashenko's replacement with Tikhanovskaya (and the extremely dubious group of Soros liberals-Russophobes behind it).

[Olgovich]

Quote: Roma-1977

Let's say so: much more people want Lukashenka's displacement than Lukashenka's replacement with Tikhanovskaya

Yes, you can say anything you want, only there is no evidence of this.

[Roma 1977]

Yanukovych didn't have it either. He also considered himself the most cunning.

[g_ae]

By the way, yesterday she conducted a stream with an answer to questions (which she had to send in advance). During the broadcast, it was watched by about 6 thousand people. Is this 97% of Belarusians?
But now, at her call, there is a collection of votes for forcing Lukashenka to negotiate (which is nonsense in itself). By March 25, it was planned to gain 3,5 million votes and present it to Western "partners". Today is April 10 and there are about 800 thousand voices. Moreover, the voices were collected with all the cheats and cheating, which the incredible openly talk about and do not hide. And what? Where is 97%? Or maybe Yermoshina (Chairperson of the CEC) was right? What urot?

[Foul skeptic]

to terror, which is the blocking of railways, access roads and highways

Do you classify road closures as terror?

[SaLaR]

Quote: A vile skeptic

to terror, which is the blocking of railways, access roads and highways

Do you classify road closures as terror?

but is not it .... and driving drills into the asphalt is not an act? and the closure of the railway arrows is not the act?

[Foul skeptic]

Not. And the Criminal Code unambiguously defines this, there is an article for blocking transport communications, and for terrorism - its own.

a crime against traffic safety and operation of transport (Chapter 28 of the Criminal Code), expressed in the deliberate creation of obstacles, the installation of posts or other actions to block transport communications, which entailed causing damage on an especially large scale (Article 310). It is a private way of bringing the communication lines to an unusable state and, in this regard, is an infringement on the safety of traffic and the operation of transport, which
associated with the infliction of material damage (part 1) or harm to human life and health (part 2). The direct object of this crime is the safe state of communications of railway, water, air, road and main pipeline transport. Transport communications are understood as complexes of technical and other means and devices that ensure the functioning of these types of transport. These include, in particular, railways, river fairways, approaches to ports, runways and taxiways, highways, highways, trunk pipelines. The subject of the crime is common, responsibility comes from the age of 16. The subjective side of the crime is characterized by willful guilt. The motives and goals of the crime do not affect the qualifications, but are taken into account when sentencing. The mental attitude to the consequences in the form of damage on an especially large scale can be expressed both in intent and in careless guilt. In general, the crime is deliberate. The qualifying consequences (part 2) are the death of a person, serious or less serious bodily injury, caused by negligence. On the subjective side, the crime in this case is characterized by complex guilt:
direct intent in relation to the fact of blocking of the corresponding type
transport communication and negligence in relation to the onset of human death, the infliction of grievous or less grievous bodily harm.

[Olgovich]

Quote: A vile skeptic

Not. And the Criminal Code unambiguously defines this, there is an article for blocking transport communications, and for terrorism - its own.

a crime against traffic safety and operation of transport (Chapter 28 of the Criminal Code), expressed in the deliberate creation of obstacles, the installation of posts or other actions to block transport communications, which entailed causing damage on an especially large scale (Article 310). It is a private way of bringing the communication lines to an unusable state and, in this regard, is an infringement on the safety of traffic and the operation of transport, which
associated with the infliction of material damage (part 1) or harm to human life and health (part 2). The direct object of this crime is the safe state of communications of railway, water, air, road and main pipeline transport. Transport communications are understood as complexes of technical and other means and devices that ensure the functioning of these types of transport. These include, in particular, railways, river fairways, approaches to ports, runways and taxiways, highways, highways, trunk pipelines. The subject of the crime is common, responsibility comes from the age of 16. The subjective side of the crime is characterized by willful guilt. The motives and goals of the crime do not affect the qualifications, but are taken into account when sentencing. The mental attitude to the consequences in the form of damage on an especially large scale can be expressed both in intent and in careless guilt. In general, the crime is deliberate. The qualifying consequences (part 2) are the death of a person, serious or less serious bodily injury, caused by negligence. On the subjective side, the crime in this case is characterized by complex guilt:
direct intent in relation to the fact of blocking of the corresponding type
transport communication and negligence in relation to the onset of human death, the infliction of grievous or less grievous bodily harm.

a mine on the road is a terrorist attack, but a drill installed for the same purpose and the same consequences is not

[Foul skeptic]

Oh, so you are a construction lawyer to understand the classifying consequences?

The motives and goals of the crime do not affect the qualifications, but are taken into account when sentencing.

a mine on the road is a terrorist attack, and a drill installed for the same purpose and the same consequences is no fool

Not. This is generally classified as hooliganism.
https://auto.onliner.by/2020/11/20/v-gomele-okolo-desyatka-mashin-probili-kolesa-na-ulice-obezdnoj

The Internal Affairs Directorate of the Gomel region clarified that this morning they began to receive messages from drivers, everyone said that they were driving from the side of the Radiation Center stop towards the microdistrict Someone had one wheel damaged, some two. On the carriageway of the P-150 highway, not far from the intersection with st. Ilyich was found a fragment of a drill driven into the asphalt. A criminal case was initiated under Art. 339 ("Hooliganism"). The drill is withdrawn.

So knock yourself.

[Olgovich]

Quote: Nefarious skeptic

This is generally classified as bullying.
https://auto.onliner.by/2020/11/20/v-gomele-okolo-desyatka-mashin-probili-kolesa-na-ulice-obezdnoj

Terrorism is one of the tactics of political struggle associated with the use of ideologically motivated violence.

The subject of terrorist violence is individuals or non-governmental organizations. The object of violence is power in the person of individual civil servants or society in the person of individual citizens (including foreigners, or civil servants of other states). Moreover - private and public property, infrastructure, life support systems. The purpose of violence is achieve the development of events desirable for terrorists

everything is present.

[Foul skeptic]

everything is present.

It’s good that you’re not a judge, right? You would be in the "top three", that would be turned around. With this approach, it is surprising that you have something against 37-38 years. On the contrary, you must be an ardent adherent.
That's it, the question is closed, you are given a link above to the official interpretation of law enforcement agencies to a hammered drill.
PS

a mine on the road is a terrorist attack

Not everything is so simple by the moon.
From the first part of the article "Hooliganism":

a) with the use of violence against citizens or the threat of its use;
b) based on political, ideological, racial, national or religious hatred or enmities either for reasons of hatred or enmity against any social group;
c) on railway, sea, inland waterway or air transport, as well as on any other public transport

From part three of the same article:

Acts provided for in the first part or the second of this article, committed using explosives or explosive devices, - are punished by imprisonment for a term of five to eight years.

Explain the difference when a mine on the road is hooliganism and when is terrorism?

[Olgovich]

Quote: Nefarious skeptic

It’s good that you’re not a judge, right? You would be in the "top three", that would be turned around. With this approach, it is surprising that you have something against 37-38 years. On the contrary, you must be an ardent adherent.

judges, find out, in your threes and were not.

Legal approach

Quote: Nefarious skeptic

That's it, the question is closed, you are given a link above to the official interpretation of law enforcement agencies to a hammered drill.

not closed: they could qualify this way and that.

The non-terrorist contract was considered to be politically advantageous.

Quote: Nefarious skeptic

Explain the difference when a mine on the road is hooliganism and when is terrorism?

Terrorism is one of the tacticsand political struggleassociated with the use of ideologically motivated violence.

Terrorism has a political goal, which is what we have in this case.

[Foul skeptic]

judges, find out, in your threes and were not.

1) i know
2) they are not mine
3) you are written in Russian in white:
"It's really good that you are not a judge, Yes?"
therefore, with this approach, you have the right place in the threes - "You would be in the "top three""
that is, precisely because you cannot adequately classify offenses, as legal scholars do, you would have looked "organically" there. Quoting you - got it, no?

not closed: they could qualify this way and that.

Quoting you - the FACT classification "Hooliganism" is obvious. Argue with the RB justice system.

The non-terrorist contract was considered to be politically advantageous.

such a statement from you is absolutely a) illogical b) unfounded

Terrorism is one of the tactics of political struggle associated with the use of ideologically motivated violence.
Terrorism has a political goal, which is what we have in this case.

Again. To explain to you

the difference when a mine on the road will be hooliganism, and when terrorism?

If not, then I am not interested in your speculations.

[Olgovich]

Quote: Nefarious skeptic

"It's really good you're not a judge, is it?"
therefore, with this approach, you should be in the top three - "You would be in the top three"
that is, precisely because you cannot adequately classify offenses, as legal scholars do, you would have looked "organically" there.

I sneeze at your inclinations to assess the adequacy, you are nobody for this.

Got it, no?

Quote: Nefarious skeptic

Quoting you - the FACT classification "Hooliganism" is obvious. Argue with the RB justice system.

recognized as terrorist attacks was considered politically unprofitable

Quote: Nefarious skeptic

Again. To explain to you
the difference when a mine on the road will be hooliganism, and when terrorism?

If not, then I am not interested in your speculations.

explained to you.

tired of

[Foul skeptic]

I sneeze at your inclinations to assess the adequacy, you are nobody for this.
Got it, no?

This does not change the fact that the discussed situation with the drill or the earlier one with road closures is absurd to classify as terrorism. I can be anybody with you as much as I want. But then the law enforcement officers of the Republic of Belarus, who adhere to the same position on these issues, will also be nobody. It's good that you are the only one here so "adequate".
Your level finally became clear after your persistence in the fact that air cannons do not have a dispersion ellipse. Therefore, I am already calm about such "adequate" conclusions of yours. With understanding and compassion.

recognized as terrorist attacks was considered politically unprofitable

a) not logical. To get a real, not a far-fetched reason for accusing a political enemy of terrorism is heavenly manna in politics, peak royal flush. And since this is not lawful in relation to the situation with a hammered drill, they did not do it. Since then the West would have gotten a trump card in its hands.
b) unfounded. Who are these "counted"? Quoting you - names, surnames, minutes of meetings.

explained to you.
tired of

Your speculations are not interesting. Consult a lawyer and the question will close by itself.

[1976AG]

Quote: Antidote

She called for fair elections, but the blue fingers, clinging to the throne, do not want to unclench voluntarily.

But she recognizes only those elections that she wins as honest.

[Roma 1977]

A politician who lives entirely on donations from foreign states and reads speeches written by someone else's hand should not stutter about "fair elections." From whom he receives funding, from those and must demand "fair elections" in their countries.

[210ox]

What choices ?? !! This fool called for a blockade of her country.

[mojohed2012]

Well, they blocked her accounts - so in the West, the special services obviously opened new ones for her long ago, and the money for them is more likely to be seen in Belarus. In general, Tikhanovskaya, like Sandu, as well as Navalny and Volkov, is a project of the Western special services. Now it is already clear that these are not independent politicians who have been smeared in the western city for the most ... be careful. They branded themselves as foreign agents, not at the suggestion of the Kremlin, but with their own connections and actions, friendship with Western experts.
If earlier the peoples followed them on a wave of hype about human rights, freedom and other things, now it is clear that these are simply sent agents of influence aimed at the collapse of the Russian Federation or Belarus.

[El Chuvachino]

The classics never get old. "And what about us?"

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Stroibat stock

It is immediately clear that she studied in the same place as our liberda. Those, too, are very concerned about their rights.

That's what the liberda is for, so that you can fill your pocket and for your belly at someone else's expense. So far there has not been a single liberal democrat in the post-Soviet space.

[Pilot]

Monsieur, geneman shpa sis zhur, give something to feed the former mother of Belarusian democracy. You need to make your face more compassionate, let a tear go ... I taught you the Democrats, Osya Bender taught you, but everything is useless ..

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Pilot

Monsieur, geneman shpa sis zhur, give something to feed the former mother of Belarusian democracy.

If it is not asking correctly, it means that it has not squandered all the reserves.

[Pilot]

So they give Euro-caramel on the cheek from time to time, they support the Euro-shoulder, maybe what else is good for, what if the Old Man orders him to live a long time ... And then along the railroad, the European road, the whole composition of the corrupt to Belarus mother ... on the motive of one thug song

[Aviator_]

The muzzle of the face must be made more compassionate, let down a tear ..

You also need to stomp on your jacket, then maybe they will serve

[halpat]

What??
Is there not enough Western money for cutlets?
900 thousand dollars in cash found in her apartment during a search, of course, no one returned, but
the mustache Bulba acted honestly - he gave her 15 thousand euros later and instructed the driver to take her to the Lithuanian border.

as much as 223 Belarusian rubles per month!
Svetka-cutlet would not be disgraced.

[Egoza]

Quote: Halpat

as much as 223 Belarusian rubles per month!
Svetka-cutlet would not be disgraced.

So she also has a disabled child ?! And where did you get into politics? With such a child you have to sit at home and develop it as much as possible !!! And why be so indignant? Does it really exist on these 223 rubles? That's how you want, but there are Ukrainian roots in Svetka! Belarusians have never been greedy.

[halpat]

Quote: Egoza

Quote: Halpat

as much as 223 Belarusian rubles per month!
Svetka-cutlet would not be disgraced.

So she also has a disabled child ?! And where did you get into politics? With such a child you have to sit at home and develop it as much as possible !!! And why be so indignant? Does it really exist on these 223 rubles? That's how you want, but there are Ukrainian roots in Svetka! Belarusians have never been greedy.

So she is Pilipchuk this is a man named Tikhanovsky.
She took her husband's surname and now mows like a Polish girl

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Halpat

as much as 223 Belarusian rubles per month!
Svetka-cutlet would not be disgraced.

The usual promotion of the brand - "Look at the whole demomir, the heroine of Western democracy has nothing to feed the child, give alms, whoever can!" (although it is necessary to ask for alms with the words "for Christ's sake," if he has no sin in his soul.)

[VORON538]

Indeed, she called on Europe to impose sanctions against Belarus, so it is good in her opinion. It flew in a response, immediately "and we are for sho?" :)))

[Lech from Android.]

Here is a bastard ... I remembered about the child when it became convenient for her. In the Belarusian Maidan, I did not even remember about the child.
Luxurious apartments in the Minsk remand prison are waiting for you in Belarus ... come, Lukashenka will meet you personally.

[Flooding]

An excellent illustration of yesterday's discussion, where the question "And who instead of Putin?" wrote an amazing "Yes, even you."
This is the very option.
Anyone but Luke.
And it's strange. How many people "with an honest and intelligent look" among the Belarusians.
But only not everyone can climb the Olympus of the opposition.

[Vadim Ananyin]

The leberda is somehow bad with thinking about the answer as to itself.
This is what she expected not to be treated the way she did to others, even if indirectly. It seems like an adult already, got into politics, get an answer for your actions.

[sergo1914]

223 rubles? Well, even Belarusian. Is there a MacBook in the photo? Purchased for retirement? Or on credit?

[Azim77]

Quote: sergo1914

223 rubles? Well, even Belarusian.

On this and the calculation. The Western community will not seek and transfer these Belarusian rubles at the rate. But it will fall for it:

Quote: sergo1914

her bank accounts were blocked in the Republic of Belarus

[Ros 56]

And what did this stupid chicken count on to get some money in there? Got into political affairs, be ready for anything and even life imprisonment.

[rotmistr60]

Tikhanovskaya complained about the economic sanctions imposed on her by the "Belarusian regime"

The most not funny? She called to fight the "regime" and thought that the regime would help her to overthrow it? But we have complete democracy - Navalny's e-wallet works and money is withdrawn for hostile activities. And the accounts of our "fighters for democracy" function perfectly and are replenished from abroad.

[Torins]

Strange woman...

[LiSiCyn]

Quote: Flood

An excellent illustration of yesterday's discussion, where the question "And who instead of Putin?" wrote an amazing "Yes, even you."

Yes, I read how you fought yesterday ... Tatyana, I was surprised Well, everything was predictable. And you didn't have a chance to prove (convey) your opinion.

Quote: Flood

This is the very option.
Anyone but Luke.
And it's strange. How many people "with an honest and intelligent look" among the Belarusians.

Agony !!!

[Flooding]

Quote: LiSiCyn

And you didn't have a chance to prove (convey) your opinion.

They beat us - and we grow stronger,
We are extinguished - we are on fire (c)

without pathos, of course
just the bast went into the line

[LiSiCyn]

✔️ Yesterday's meeting of the Saratov blogger Nikolai Bondarenko with the Moscow CPRF candidates for the State Duma and party ideologists was held in the form of a training presentation.

Bondarenko recommended to the candidates from the Communist Party to the State Duma:

- Do not emphasize party affiliation and avoid sensitive topics (attitude to Stalin, the USSR and Donbass), so as not to alienate the potential electorate and audience

- Look for hype everywhere (according to the deputy, if he does not have the opportunity to shoot a loud video, he simply does not attend meetings of the Saratov Regional Duma)

- As part of promoting their Internet resources, collaborate with any political forces and agree on cooperation

- Do not register your blogs on yourself and thus avoid taxes when monetizing them, as well as avoid the need for unnecessary declarations.

Those attending the meeting were strongly advised not to share the voiced technologies with the general public, so I attach the full version of his presentation:

This is again, returning to yesterday's discussion.

[Kabaska]

And us for what ?!

[Prisoner]

And what did this freedom want? She called for "heavenly punishments" and sanctions throughout the Republic. Receive and sign. Karma she is.

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

It's time for the young lady to look for work. Either as a servant, or on the track. The choice is there.

[Viktor Sergeev]

Nothing girl, sponsors are still paying you.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Victor Sergeev

Nothing girl, sponsors are still paying you.

The entire western liberda started to cry, and now it will start collecting "grandmothers", although those who supported it the most will modestly keep silent.

[tralflot1832]

For a start, for 15 years she didn’t tell her spouse !!! 15 years for a man to sit because of this woman !!!

[Viktor Sergeev]

And why does she need him now, she will find a foreign hakhal for herself.

[Egoza]

Quote: Victor Sergeev

she will find herself a foreign hakhalya.

With such and such a mug? Yes with such a famous character? "I am wondering, however"

[Alien From]

She thought that they would only stroke her on the head ...

[APASUS]

As I understand it, he does not live in a trash heap in Lithuania, there are still funds and accounts. It's funny sometimes to look at the opposition in the countries

[aszzz888]

She whined .... it's just not flowers for you. Hopefully in Belarus they know how to deal with it.

[g_ae]

Well, but by her grace, the sanatorium "Belarus", which belongs to the administration of the President of the Republic of Belarus, where children with cerebral palsy were treated, was closed in Druskinenkai. And 400 people were left without work. This is incredible ... chuck.

[petrol cutter]

By the way, yes!
And how is Svetochka there?
Forgive God, I have already forgotten about her existence! ..
On the other hand, in light of expected / not expected events in UA- Svetlana is not a star now. It's not up to her a little bit.
And the loss of 223 rubles will hardly impress anyone.

[Yuriy71]

Or maybe the card has just expired? You need to come and come to the Bank's Office! Everything will be decided in Five minutes)))

[Financier]

Tikhanovskaya complained about the economic sanctions imposed on her by the "Belarusian regime"

This is she like "and me for sho?"
Is the Lithuanian "salary" no longer enough for her?
Poor thing. She urgently needs to get a job as a cook

[Joker62]

Does this lady have labor money in her account? Perhaps not ... it means that the government has the right to freeze accounts until all the circumstances are clarified, where did she get the money, if she is a housewife.

[Maxxcc]

Was the money in the account?))))

[Maxxcc]

Actually, she did not complain, but stated a fact.

[kill the fascist]

The wrong revolutionary has gone today - he has shrunk. Plastic blocked she is already moaning. Although it is understandable - her mentors promised Lukash's chair and a lot of money, but here is such an oops.

[Klingon]

right now, she and foreign grants will be deprived on the sly because the business has not burned out and the bourgeoisie will not pay for windbag if the results are not obvious