French Foreign Minister called on Iran to "constructive position in the negotiations proposed by the US on the nuclear deal"

French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian held talks with his Iranian counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif. The main topic during the negotiations concerned the issue of the so-called nuclear deal - a comprehensive plan of measures for the denuclearization of Iran. Recall that under the 45th President Donald Trump, the United States withdrew from the agreement with Iran unilaterally. After some time, Iran, seeing that the US was not going to return to the implementation of the agreement, began the process of enriching nuclear fuel.

During talks with the Iranian Foreign Minister, the French minister called on Iran to "take a constructive position in the negotiations proposed by the United States." Le Drian also added that he personally asks Iran "to refrain from violating its obligations in the format of the deal." According to the head of French diplomacy, if Iran takes a "constructive position, it will be an excellent option for a comprehensive agreement."

Interesting position of the French minister. According to Le Drian's logic, it turns out that it is Iran that should take a constructive position, although the United States was the first to withdraw from the deal.

Recall that the other day the American media announced the readiness of the Biden administration to negotiate with Tehran, but on one condition: Iran must hand over to the United States a complete list of its nuclear facilities, and Washington will inform Iran which of these facilities it must close.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei noted that Iran will return to the nuclear deal if the first step is taken by the United States itself, which was the first to withdraw from it. According to the spiritual leader of Iran, the United States should lift all the sanctions previously imposed on Iran and not introduce new restrictions.

According to the head of the Iranian Foreign Ministry Javad Zarif, expressed in response to Le Drian, Tehran so far only hears demands from the West, primarily from the United States, but does not hear any proposals. It was noted that, moreover, Washington has not officially proposed any negotiations yet, "and Tehran does not consider the publications of the American media to be official statements of the US authorities."

Comments

[The leader of the Redskins]

They warn in advance on which side and pressure psychologically ...

[svp67]

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

They warn in advance on which side and pressure psychologically ...

In vain they are .... Iran forgets nothing. And French business could be hit hard.

Le Drian also added that he personally asks Iran "to refrain from violating its obligations in the format of the deal."

It is strange to call on one of the parties to fulfill the agreement when the other side refused to fulfill them.

[mitroha]

the readiness of the Biden administration to negotiate with Tehran, but on one condition: Iran must hand over to the United States a complete list of its nuclear facilities, and Washington will tell Iran which of these facilities it must close.

This is what I understand, the agreement in the American way. And then they change their minds and leave. What can you negotiate with them?

[Lionnvrsk]

Quote: svp67

It is strange to call on one of the parties to fulfill the agreement when the other side refused to fulfill them.

If gentlemen start to lose, they change the rules of the game - the eternal rule of European diplomacy.

[avg]

Quote: svp67

It is strange to call on one of the parties to fulfill the agreement when the other side refused to fulfill them.

Yes, once such a thing would have seemed strange, even before the very concept of "conscience" disappeared from politics.

[xorek]

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

They warn in advance on which side and pressure psychologically ...

After the assassination of the vile Iranian general and Iranian nuclear scientists .. I think Iran should not negotiate with these ... After all, they will betray and throw as usual! Moreover, the country will be flooded with blood, like Iraq
There is Russia, with which mutually beneficial cooperation has been going on for a long time in all areas of the BV! Do not trust the Danes who give gifts! This is Iran and Russia have already passed through their history more than once .. The goal of the West is to bring both Iran and Russia to their knees, we prevent them from banditrying and robbing BV! It's time to unite ..

[knn54]

Where is the "cardinal". There and the "haberdasher".
That's why it is NATO.

[Nyrobsky]

Macron is still a weather vane, spinning in all directions, but everything is out of place. Iran, however, clearly said - "First, the lifting of all sanctions, then we will crackle on the nuclear deal."

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Nyrobsky

Macron is still a weather vane, whirling around in all directions, but everything is out of place.

In Soviet times, they used to say about such people in Lithuania, "albertas sesternyovas".

[Prisoner]

In translation, do what they say and do not arise. Makoroshka is still trying to build something of itself. Builder, EPRST!

[Tagan]

Stupid and meaningless conversations. For paddling pools, purely for show, and not for the sake of the result.

[archiroll]

a constructive position from the point of view of a capitalist is to stand with his pants down in the right position ...

[svoit]

So it seems that no negotiations are required, just the United States needs to fulfill its obligations, and that's it.

[aszzz888]

Also Le Drian added that he personally asks Iran "to refrain from violating its obligations in the format of the deal."

Let him redirect these words to the Merikatos, it will be fairer.

[VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK]

They suggest that Iran should not pay attention to the United States!

[Zaurbek]

Good and bad cops .....

[Gennady Fomkin]

All you need to know about the "politics" of Europe cookies end with the end of the expansion.

[rotmistr60]

French minister called on Iran to "constructive position in the negotiations proposed by the United States"

When the United States first withdrew from the deal and is now offering to return to it but on their terms, does the Frenchman call on Iran to take a "constructive position"? Who, who, but not the French to talk about such a position. An example of this is Libya and aiding the Bandera regime in Ukraine without any "constructive positions".

[Iris]

It is difficult for normal people, even politicians, to understand the logic and motives of a mentally ill regime. Therefore, all of them - both Europeans and each new US administration - call on Iran to be pragmatic. A pragmatic fanatic is an oxymoron like a "good robber".
Ayatollah set the task of creating atomic weapons at any cost, and negotiations in this light are only a means to stretch out time and accumulate enriched uranium. Neither the country's economy as a whole, nor the standard of living of citizens, nor the political consequences - no arguments matter.

Moreover, if a miracle happened and he really decided to give up the military atom in exchange for arbitrarily serious dividends, this would mean certain death for him. Such a decision will be unambiguously perceived as weakness and defeat both by supporters and by the internal opposition. The same "Guardians of the Revolution" who are guarding it now, on the same day they will demolish it, as has happened more than once in history. Once you sit on a tiger, then you won't get off it .. Therefore, today, no decision, except for the power one, is unfortunately not visible, and in this scenario, the position of European countries in principle does not matter.

[Jaromir]

French MFA

Recently, France has been trying to get into all the "cracks". Apparently in this way France is trying to create a new political center out of itself. But nothing comes of them. And so and so, but no one listens to them and, frankly, they slaughter their statements

[Puler]

The French Foreign Minister should be reminded of France's debts to the Libyan Republic and personally to former President Sarkozy Muammaru ...

[Alexy]

What constructive position can Iran have if any subsequent US prezik can easily cancel all agreements unilaterally ???