The Kremlin commented on the statements of the US Department of Defense on intentions "to protect Ukraine from Russian aggression"

130

The journalists asked the head of the Kremlin press service Dmitry Peskov to comment on the statements of US officials about "protecting Ukraine from Russian aggression." We are talking about the appearance on the website of the Ukrainian military department of information that, following the results of telephone conversations between the heads of the US Defense Ministry and Ukraine, the former announced a promise "to ensure the protection of Ukraine from aggression from Russia."

In the US Department of Defense:



We will not leave Ukraine alone with the enemy.

Dmitry Peskov, commenting on the situation, noted that if US troops or NATO forces appear on the territory of Ukraine, this will lead to a further increase in tensions near the Russian borders.

Obvious things ...

Further, the Kremlin noted that, in turn, this will require retaliatory measures from the Russian Federation.

Dmitry Peskov:

These countermeasures will be to improve the provision of Russian security.

The journalists asked the president's press secretary what exactly these measures would be. According to Peskov, "everything that is needed for this."

Dmitry Peskov also noted that Russia did not threaten anyone and does not threaten, while he sees perfectly well that the situation in eastern Ukraine - along the line of demarcation - is "very frightening." Peskov added that Ukraine is going to commit obvious provocations.

The presidential press secretary noted that they are again trying to assign responsibility to Russia as a party to the conflict in Donbass, although the Russian Federation is not such.
130 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    April 2 2021 14: 07
    NATO aircraft will surely appear in the skies of the outskirts.
    1. +26
      April 2 2021 14: 13
      Will appear. Of course. As in Georgia.
      1. 0
        April 2 2021 15: 45
        By the way, Reapers and MLRS have already been relocated to Romania.
        1. 0
          April 2 2021 16: 48
          Are these the ones that were in Turkey at the time of the Georgian conflict?
          1. 0
            April 2 2021 16: 51
            I don’t know that ... but they relocated from Italy, it seems.
            1. +1
              April 2 2021 16: 54
              I heard that a lot has been relocated from Incirlik to Romania.
    2. +2
      April 2 2021 14: 23
      Quote: figvam
      NATO aircraft will surely appear in the skies of the outskirts.

      They are, that "stupid people" ... Although, transport, bringing weapons and ammunition, and reconnaissance, in the form of a UAV
      1. +24
        April 2 2021 14: 33
        Verbal promises, on the American side, cost no more than the cost of a phone call.
        1. -24
          April 2 2021 14: 55
          And what should they do to fulfill their promises? The United States is a little in crisis, they need to do something, for example, a small victorious conflict.
          1. +22
            April 2 2021 15: 00
            Quote: Reiter
            for example a small victorious conflict.

            ... where Russia will be on the one hand ... however, you have an idea of ​​small conflicts ... smile
            1. -23
              April 2 2021 15: 03
              Will Russia attack the American contingent on the territory of Ukraine and invited there by the "legitimate" Ukrainian authorities? I doubt he will attack.
              1. +2
                April 2 2021 15: 12
                Quote: Reiter
                Russia will attack the American contingent on the territory of Ukraine

                The Americans attacked the Russians in Syria.
                Famous case. Remember?
                1. -10
                  April 2 2021 15: 18
                  I remember this incident, and it’s just not in favor of the situation for Donbass. To begin with, the United States in Syria is not legally and not enough, they attacked and killed Russian citizens within a few hours. So Russia did not answer there. And then he will answer? Will answer what? Here, the United States will be legally in full right. Moreover, Russia will probably not answer here. I don't know what will have to happen for the answer.
                  1. +10
                    April 2 2021 15: 48
                    Legally, the Russian Federation will be right here too. The DNR and the LNR may come over us. And the border is the longest between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, it is also necessary to look at this. In contrast to the CAA, where the contingent is "remote."
                    1. -5
                      April 2 2021 15: 58
                      DPR-LPR are not recognized as states. Of course they can, but this will hardly give Russia any legal advantages, or rather, the position of the United States is more concrete here. What the Russian Federation would have helped a lot is non-recognition of the regime in Kiev. But a catastrophic mistake happened, Putin recognized Poroshenko, and then, in fact, recognized Zelensky, although there were formal reasons for non-recognition. I don't understand how many people in the Kremlin can jump on the same rake. They are constantly thrown, but they do not change tactics, they only have a reflection on events.
                      1. +3
                        April 2 2021 16: 29
                        there may be many options ..... there are precedents such as Kosovo or Idlib .... The question is, what's in the Kremlin's heads? But I think that in comparison with 2014, there should be more useful things for the Russian Federation, because there are fewer illusions.
                      2. -1
                        April 2 2021 16: 42
                        I really hope for it.
                  2. -19
                    April 2 2021 16: 07
                    When Kabaeva will be attacked! Then the answer will immediately be (((:
                    1. -4
                      April 2 2021 17: 16
                      [quote] [When Kabaeva will be attacked! Then the answer will immediately be (((: / quote] ..... and she is not yet on the sanctions list ...... how
                    2. -6
                      April 2 2021 22: 39
                      or an illegitimate daughter
                  3. +3
                    April 2 2021 22: 12
                    Are you talking about the mythical battle of Wagner at Hasham?
              2. +6
                April 2 2021 19: 08
                And who told you that Russia would attack "the American contingent located on the territory of Ukraine and invited there by the" legitimate "Ukrainian authorities?"
                Imagine, the contingent at well-known bases, everyone is safe, and around the scorched earth laughing And those who were not at the bases are to blame.
              3. +8
                April 2 2021 20: 59
                What for?))) In Georgia, the contingent just sat at the bases and did not touch them)
              4. +4
                April 2 2021 22: 09
                No, the American contingent will be attacked by Tochka-U buried by the Bolsheviks in the tunnels of Donbass. And if it does not help, then Iskander, assembled by miners from a steam locomotive and processed with a file.
          2. +12
            April 2 2021 15: 49
            Quote: Reiter
            The United States is a little in crisis, they need to do something, for example, a small victorious conflict.

            Victorious conflict? With Russia? Are you out of your mind? Russia, this is not Grenada, not Panama, or Yugoslavia. On the one hand, America, by and large, has not helped anyone yet; it has always defended its own interests exclusively. Of course, they can help destroy everything to the end, but in a constructive sense, never. In addition, over the past seventy years, they have essentially not won a single war. They will help with weapons and money, and those ukrovoyaki are still fighters. From boiler to boiler.
            1. -14
              April 2 2021 16: 03
              Why with Russia, with "pro-Russian separatists". Or is there already a Russian military in the DPR-LPR? Will Russia openly fit into a war with American military units if not a single bullet flies into Russian territory? It won't even fly into the Crimea. Will the Russian military destroy American gunners and pilots on the ground and in the air of Ukraine?
              1. +13
                April 2 2021 16: 18
                Quote: Reiter
                Why with Russia, with "pro-Russian separatists".

                Well, first of all, the "pro-Russian separatists" were doing just fine before that. As for the Americans, I doubt that they will directly send their troops into Ukraine, as they say, "there are no bad people." All the states can do is toss weapons, make some money (since the machine is still working) and breed guano in the information environment. This is their strong point. The point is different. In any case, the issue with Ukraine will have to be resolved by Russia, and since the matter has gone too far, it will have to be resolved radically. so the enforcement of peace is only a matter of time. And the fact that the entire "collective west" is releasing all the dogs on Russia, so when was it different?
                1. -14
                  April 2 2021 16: 26
                  I would have your confidence that the United States and Britain will not participate in more than just the supply of weapons and training. Today, the military personnel of the United States, Britain, Poland are already present in Ukraine and in quantities of more than 100 people. And not only during the exercises that are held regularly in Ukraine, then the number of Americans or Britons already reached 2000 soldiers at a time. Remember last year, the massive landing of a British brigade in southern Ukraine. Today, specialists from the United States and other Western allies are constantly rubbing at the line of contact, Globolhawks fly along the borders. There is a constant supply of intelligence.
                  1. +7
                    April 2 2021 16: 37
                    I have to disagree with you. Firstly, the soldiers are not so hot with them, and they know it very well. The fact that they are preparing someone there, that they are participating in some kind of demonstrative exercises, does not mean anything. American drones fly along borders, again because no one touches them. And if Russia gets involved in a conflict, making a no-fly zone over Ukraine is a piece of cake. Yes, a lot of things. In my opinion, the Americans will fight with Russia, until the last Ukrainian, they will not climb themselves. Modern Ukraine has been honed for this for thirty years.
                    1. -13
                      April 2 2021 16: 50
                      Why would the Americans climb into the trenches or go on the attack on the front line, for this there are Ukrainians, at worst, Poles. And they themselves can remarkably work remotely, as they bombarded Yugoslavia with bombs or the same Libya. The Americans can provide an advantage in the air and knock out artillery and corps tanks from a distance through satellite and UAV reconnaissance, as well as high-tech precision weapons, both rocket artillery and airborne. Further, the militias are driven into cities, cut off from borders and supplies, surrounded and, after negotiations, leave for Russia. This is quite realistic, we need to calculate this option already yesterday, today the situation is simply screaming about how to prevent this.
                  2. +7
                    April 2 2021 17: 53
                    At the moment, the Armed Forces of Ukraine have 93 Ukrainian-Polish-Lithuanian motorized rifle brigades. Two motorized rifle battalions from each country. Two battalions of the 101st US Airborne Division on a rotational basis were tightly registered at the Yavoriv training ground for training Ukrainian warriors. One battalion, also on a rotational basis, at the Shirokiy Lan range near Nikolaev. Another company of this division is deployed near Kiev to guard military depots with US weapons, which Ukraine has the right to use ONLY in case of REAL aggression by Russia. These are only official units, not counting units of various PMCs.
                    The entire second floor of the SBU building in Kiev is occupied by American intelligence services - NSA, CIA, ISI.
                    But even OSCE observers still do not see the official regular combat units of the Russian Army in Ukraine.
                  3. -11
                    April 2 2021 18: 15
                    I advise the miners to remember this post and their position on it, and remember when all this will happen in real life. It's not long to wait, I hope their cons will help against the Yankees. I hope you will be in the trenches there, and not scribble lines on the sofas here, having forgotten by the time how frivolous you are taking this situation. I will not forget to remember you.
          3. -8
            April 2 2021 20: 04
            Such a number of minuses speaks of a low level of threat perception, or, more simply, of the public's hatred in VO, in fact, this is frivolity, bordering on criminal negligence. Then what do you and I want from the commander-in-chief, he is also a man. Sadly, this all only confirms the inevitability of very harsh events, negligence will have to pay, and we will win, but, as always, at the cost of a lot of blood.
            1. +5
              April 2 2021 21: 03
              He is not low but real. The war with this formation is a matter of time. All this has long been understood already
              1. -3
                April 2 2021 21: 44
                On account of the inevitability of a forceful way out of the situation, then yes, many have already understood this. It’s just that many people still don’t understand that the United States has taken this situation very seriously and will play it out rather stubbornly and even harness itself with participation at the level of power units. And not hidden special groups, which have already been working there for a long time, namely, open units. The United States is already losing ground from under its feet, they feel it, they have three or four years of time, then they will not have a chance to slow down their fall at all. Because here they will go far. This must be understood and prepared for a tough confrontation.
                1. 0
                  April 2 2021 22: 01
                  Everyone has understood this for a long time. Don't make news out of this. 1 army is not easy to move forces.
                  1. -4
                    April 2 2021 22: 35
                    At the top they understand, but the common people, judging by the minuses, still live in a simplified understanding of the situation, yesterday.
          4. +2
            April 2 2021 20: 14
            That's what unpleasant to me - this is another verbiage of Peskov. I quote: "Dmitry Peskov, commenting on the situation, noted that if US troops or NATO forces appear on the territory of Ukraine, this will lead to a further increase in tensions near the Russian borders. " Well done Sands! And I thought out of my dullness that the appearance of US troops in Ukraine would ensure progress and welfare in the Russian Federation. Reading what was written in the article, I realized one thing. If America places its troops in Ukraine, it will be unpleasant for Russia. I would also wish you health.
            1. 0
              April 5 2021 02: 10
              So what? He openly said that they would get a war there. .we decide what next. We didn’t hide it.
              1. 0
                April 5 2021 08: 57
                Dmitry. The point is that the statements of the "head of state's voice" should not contain banal truths and verbal rubbish. Peskov said that "if US troops or NATO forces appear on the territory of Ukraine, this will lead to a further increase in tensions along the Russian borders." What did anyone think differently? Like, it will not lead to further growth ...
                Even a first grader is clear what will lead. So why tell the obvious to the whole world.
          5. -1
            April 3 2021 04: 48
            The Americans won't shoot themselves in the leg! Russia needs Ukraine! And this will be a direct reason to introduce the Russians
            troops to Kiev! Do the Americans need it?
            1. 0
              April 3 2021 09: 36
              Any option is beneficial to the Americans. Ukraine will win, it's good - they showed the world who is still the boss. If the Russian Federation will send troops to Kiev, it's good - the Western world should make the Russian Federation an outcast and buy all the gas from the United States.
        2. +5
          April 2 2021 22: 06
          Quote: marchcat
          Verbal promises, on the American side, cost no more than the cost of a phone call.

          You are wrong. It is quite capable of pushing Ukraine against Russia. And provide her with weapons. And if Ukraine does this, then the United States will be very happy.
          1. 0
            April 4 2021 03: 59
            Namvnoe reasoning about the collision of Ukraine and Russia!
        3. 0
          April 3 2021 01: 31
          Read the news, there is already a lot of interesting things besides the call happened. From the old I can remind you that a provocation against the SP-2, this is a hint, apparently, so that the Russian Federation does not run up when it starts in Donbass. Now it's hot in the LPR, and immediately the exercises between Ukraine and NATO began.
          1. 0
            April 4 2021 04: 06
            America is only a cock! If America wanted to, then at the end of the forties and beginning of the peteries, Russia would have been bombarded with nuclear bombs long ago! Even at that time, if Russia had a nuclear bomb, it did not have the delivery of this weapon! Remember the Cuban missile crisis! What did John F. Kennedy ask the chief of the general staff? Are you sure that not a single bomb will fall on US soil? No Mr. President! Not sure.
      2. +27
        April 2 2021 14: 40
        Quote: svp67
        They are that "stupid people" ..

        Look at Biden ...
        And for the whole gang that captured the United States against the will of the American people ...
        They did not regret their country, almost plunging it into a full-scale civil war. So will they regret Ukraine?
        Will they intervene themselves?
        Who knows? But in any case, they will try to tie the Youngonatists from the former Warsaw Pact into it.
        And everything will depend on the will and determination of Russia to crush this gadyushnik. If the actions are quick and decisive ... then no one will get involved, they will just breathe a sigh of relief (in Europe) and will buy gas. All this had to be done in 2014 and the CSTO should be involved in this. Then all this was easier to implement.
        And the people of Ukraine have been waiting for this ... for 7 years already. Up to 3/4 will be greeted with flowers, 10 - 15 percent will put their heads in order for some time after enemy propaganda, and the remaining 10% ... will either run away or be severely punished for active illegal actions.
        And yes, it’s time to form the government of Ukraine in exile.
        1. +3
          April 2 2021 15: 15
          Quote: bayard
          Look at Biden ...

          Because the ruling party has changed, then all the programs of the Democrats, which were postponed due to Trump's victory in the previous elections, are now reactivated. Both in Syria and Ukraine, the Baltic states will soon wake up, and so on. You can even scroll back to VO, in the "era" of Democratic rule and see the events that will be on the agenda now.
          1. +2
            April 2 2021 15: 23
            So it's time for Russia to wake up.
            Spring came . bully
        2. +5
          April 2 2021 21: 22
          Bayard! I quote you "everything will depend on the will and determination of Russia to crush this gadyushnik“I absolutely agree. Opponents say yes. Where can we compete with America with such an economy. But, firstly, our economy is not as weak as we are told. A trick is used. They convert the gross product into dollars and get an unseemly picture. Then, in a couple of months the dollar exchange rate almost doubled, and mostly by hand, so during this time cows in Russia began to produce half as much milk, miners began to produce half as much coal? They give an example - where, they say, are Russian smartphones? And where, sorry, Swedish or British smartphones? By this logic, the most developed economy in Taiwan, and there they eat snakes, and the people are poor in their mass. In 2014, the Soviet economy after the loss Ukraine and southern Russia was much weaker than European (Germany + continent,) and the people were in poverty, but come on. My question... Why is our government in this conflict behaving in a deliberately weak position? Biden is "Putin the Killer". Putin - "I wish him (Biden) health." And now the Lithuanian president repeats like a parrot, and Ukrainian friends repeat like parrots. Is it good? After all, weak rhetoric provokes the adversary to raise the stakes simply because America's lackeys, such as the Lithuanian president, are beginning to push for new provocations, someday they will have to answer in an adult way, and this is already fraught with not just reputational losses, but real victims
          1. +5
            April 2 2021 23: 56
            Quote: mikh-korsakov
            My question. Why does our government in this conflict behave in a deliberately weak position?

            If we leave aside the purely personal factor of our leader (which has faded very much over the past year in rhetoric and has generally lost even the semblance of independence in decisions), then there are several reasons:
            - I really want to finish building the SP-2, but for this you need to endure and maneuver, not to allow harsh actions and words. Capitalism is like that - not for the state, but at the expense of the state.
            - in the light of the recent aggravation of relations between China and the United States, I really do not want to distract the Americans from such an intoxicating and useful confrontation with unnecessary harshness. And for this you can be patient. Let the eagle and the dragon grapple more tightly, then it will be easier for the bear to keep order in his forest.
            - after the coup d'etat in the United States and the usurpation of power by the Democrats, it is not very clear what plans these rabid degradants and perverts have. Active perturbations in Europe with a sharp intensification of military exercises, their frequency and scope, the activity of British special services in Turkey, the BV and Central Asia with the updating of the "Great Turan" program, the next statements by Japan about the "return of the Kuriles" and the systematic build-up of the power of their fleet and ground forces in general ... make you act more balanced and prudent. Being alone in a state of war on several fronts at the same time does not smile at anyone in the Kremlin, no matter which tower you belong to.
            Therefore, weak rhetoric ... If you look / listen to the Russian media space, then it seems like the opposite - the drums of war sounded, readily "not to abandon Donbass" and even "finally resolve the issue of Ukrainian statehood" ... Again, the Zapad-2021 exercises with the simultaneous deployment of military bases in Belarus ... And what is surprising, the Belarusian Bonaparte seems to be so tightly pressed that, as far as he previously resisted the appearance of Russian bases, he now offers to place more and more places for deployment.
            So such actions are not a response by rhetoric, but by action. It is more useful if you do it right.
            And the West itself is going to scandal and aggravation.
            What's behind this?
            Perhaps our leaders know a little more than is reported in the press.
            Perhaps the collective West has decided on something.
            It is not worth looking for rationality or seeking profit here. War is generally an irrational thing, but it happens often in our imperfect world. And often for the solution of completely different goals and objectives than officially declared.
            America is losing leadership.
            And they do not know how to lose.
            Are they ready to go to madness for the sake of not even maintaining leadership, but according to the principle "Don't get anyone else to do you?"
            Look at what they have done with their country over the past year.
            For the sake of leadership of one of the parties, they nearly smashed the United States to shreds.
            Look at their current leaders.
            On their talking heads.
            Do you think that in the event of an impending total geopolitical defeat, they will humbly accept this for granted, or will they behave like "democrats" during the last US elections?
            For some reason, it seems to me that no one thinks rationally there.
            And there is essentially no one to talk to.
            There is simply no people with whom you can, no trust in the United States as a responsible partner.
            Stalin also behaved very carefully and restrained on the eve of the War ...
            "Nobody wanted war ... War was inevitable."

            ... In the past year, a lot of irrational things have happened in the world ...
            If you look from the point of view of an ordinary man in the street ...
            But it is the irrationality of what is happening that suggests that some decisions have already been made at the global level, and now the course of events is simply being adjusted to some already drawn up plans.
            How will the leadership of the Russian Federation behave?
            In this difficult situation?
            Was she given any choice ...?
            We will see.
            1. +1
              April 3 2021 08: 58
              Dear Bayard. About Putin's personality... IMHO. Putin's personality is multifaceted. The positive qualities include the fact that in conditions of "enemy encirclement" he managed, no matter what he said, to remain a strong politician, to whom they involuntarily, but they turn, knows how to use the open windows of Overton (Crimea), after many trial and error he managed to create near him a workable power unit, no matter how slandered the enemies - in itself is not greedy - like he has everything. Negative qualities include stubbornness - only a lazy or, say, do.rak did not write that the introduction of a progressive tax, as is done everywhere, could reduce social tension in the country, replenish the budget, and eliminate the ugly stains of capitalism like "Morgenstern". But with perseverance there is no worthy better application, he insists that they will go into the shadows, so it is difficult to administer. Excuse me, everything is in his hands, we have the best tax service in the world, put any dodger for ten years, as they did everywhere, and people will understand. He kept an openly mediocre Medvedev on the farm. Poser - flying with birds, and just on a fighter is too much. I think he likes the caricature of him riding a bear. I created a "courtyard" with courtiers, whatever, if only the courtiers were smart. Recently, I have been susceptible to the flattery of courtiers and "people" in civilian clothes ..
              I agree that times are troubling... IMHO. What we have. The economy is on the rise. The proof is increased inflation, the inevitable companion of economic recovery under liberal capitalism. And in the US, and in China, and partly in the EU - the economy is no longer liberal. The roasted cock pecked. Instead of Medvedev, a fully efficient government of Mishustin-Belousov-Borisov appeared. Whoever says anything, but thanks to them, the country passes the pandemic with relative ease. It's funny to see how Mishustin, as an experienced courtier, commenting on the steps of the government exclaims "You prompted all this, Your Majesty!" But strong enough to fight with a rabid collective west lacks.
              And what's below.? People... Stratified. There is an insignificant mass, but noisy exhaust, an insignificant layer of parasites in the form of youngsters making big money on the basis of demonstrating their own ass on the Internet, or whatever they think is cool. They are joined by an eternally dissatisfied, noisily slanderous group of idlers in the form of a non-systemic opposition. The situation is saved by a group of people, how many of them I do not know, because they are silent, they are busy, who are simply interested in working or serving the fatherland. It was they who created the vaccine, those who, with difficulty, often push the conditions through their butts. because of which Russia is considered. It is these people, and only they, who can save Russia. Will I have enough strength - I don't know.
              1. +1
                April 3 2021 14: 34
                hi You described the portrait of Majesty very well, but slightly overestimated its subjectivity ... Unfortunately (and last year it showed it especially vividly), he does not make decisions on his own ... and does not even form the agenda ...
                He voices it.
                And to create the seriousness of the image, all this work of image makers and political strategists was carried out. Hence the overlaps with cranes and other choreographed demonstrations. This is the kind of role that he coped well with ...
                On the outer loop.
                But inside, everything is simpler - it is not his diocese, and it is not for him to lead politics. Therefore, the binge (outrageous) of officials, and the inefficiency of the economy, and the rejection of attempts to build a sovereign financial system ... Moreover, the deflection under ANY requirements of the IMF and the World Bank.
                And the immunity of Medvedev.
                And everyone is like him.
                And Chubais with a galaxy of former reformers.
                And praise from the lips of the Guarantor to the destroyers of the Fatherland - Gorbachev and Yeltsin.
                These are striking markers of absolute non-subjectivity.
                He has a prescribed regulation, so he works according to it.
                And you should not expect more from him - this is not prescribed in his role.
                But the people you mentioned are there. And all the hope today is only on them ... and not on Mishustin, who, in fact, is just a working module of the state machine ... working according to an external program.
                And there is too little time left.
                And overlooked over the years ... too much ...
                1. +1
                  April 3 2021 16: 11
                  Bayard. I'm leaving now. so for now I will be brief. About Mishustin. "Working module of the state machine"- this is not a little, they would all be modules, not whistles, they would live like in Sochi, excuse the pun of the old professional. I had the misfortune to observe the work of the tax inspection before Mishustin, and now - you know there is a huge difference. not to those who speak, but to those who work.the rest - I will comprehend, and if it works out I will answer.
    3. +2
      April 2 2021 20: 18
      Quote: figvam
      NATO aircraft will surely appear in the skies of the outskirts.

      ========
      Already, Sergey! Already! Amer "strategists" and drones fly there, "like at home" !!! request
    4. 0
      April 3 2021 13: 04
      I wonder on what basis? And after the inevitable loss of a dozen other aircraft - international pilots will 100% REFUSE to fly on combat missions - there is a precedent for this when American pilots went on strike after Vietnam used the 125th air defense system.
  2. 0
    April 2 2021 14: 11
    We are talking about the appearance on the website of the Ukrainian military department of information that, following the results of telephone conversations between the heads of the US Defense Ministry and Ukraine, the former announced a promise "to ensure the protection of Ukraine from aggression from Russia."
    Found something to comment ...
  3. +7
    April 2 2021 14: 13
    ... if US troops or NATO forces appear on Ukrainian territory, this will lead to a further increase in tensions along the Russian borders.

    This will be a serious challenge to which it is necessary and serious to respond.
    1. +2
      April 2 2021 14: 33
      This had to be answered in 2014. Now we have to live with it. The multi-move has brought NATO to the borders of Russia.
      1. -3
        April 2 2021 15: 03
        Quote: 210ox
        This had to be answered in 2014. Now we have to live with it. The multi-move has brought NATO to the borders of Russia.

        NATO would have been at our borders even without multi-passages, the whole question was only whether there would be NATO at our borders with bases in Sevastopol or without bases
        1. 0
          April 2 2021 19: 01
          No, the question was different. Where are these bases, near Donetsk or near Lviv. Now it turns out both there and there.
  4. +11
    April 2 2021 14: 16
    And what do you want to hear from the President's press secretary! These issues are dealt with by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and if an unavoidable misunderstanding of the opponent arises, then the matter moves into the area of ​​the Ministry of Defense's competence. While we are trying to resolve this issue at the level of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. If the troops are moving, then this is only for in order not to repeat June 22, 1941.
    1. +6
      April 2 2021 14: 24
      Quote: tralflot1832
      The Ministry of Foreign Affairs deals with such issues

      The President deals with the issues of war and peace, and everyone else simply fulfills his will.
      1. +3
        April 2 2021 14: 30
        The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Defense provide options for resolving the issue, the President chooses an option. For this, a vertical of power has been created. If, in your opinion, the President got out of bed with his left foot, then the whole world is in dust?
        1. +6
          April 2 2021 14: 33
          Quote: tralflot1832
          The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Defense provide options for resolving the issue, the President chooses an option

          Only if he does not have his own and then he instructs them to WORK
          Quote: tralflot1832
          If, in your opinion, the President got out of bed with his left foot, then the whole world is in dust?

          The President has a very strong "apparatus" in which there are a lot of analysts and forecasters, and all the information flows to them for elaboration. And the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Defense are highly specialized EXECUTIVE BODIES
          1. +5
            April 2 2021 14: 51
            By the way, Peskov has already answered the question on Ukraine more specifically: Strengthening NATO troops around Ukraine will require additional measures! This is still diplomatic. But there is already a violation of the agreement on the deployment of troops from both sides in the European part. The air smells more and more of sulfur. The president looks like steel fabergés. Will at least live until the summer?
            1. -11
              April 2 2021 14: 58
              What a commotion? Raguli have no army, and in general, in seven years, all the lads fled in all directions .... the outskirts collapsed. There is no one and nothing to fight there. On the first anal, they said so.
              1. +4
                April 2 2021 15: 04
                I don’t look at the analys, there’s grief for the experts.
              2. 0
                April 2 2021 19: 03
                So VO is full of such. They are waiting for the idiots to fall apart, we will shower NATU with hats ..
                1. +1
                  April 2 2021 22: 26
                  How many tanks did Nata have on the move, and not on papers? Otherwise, Die Welt is crying that the authorities are hiding.
            2. +2
              April 2 2021 15: 10
              But there is already a violation of the agreement on the deployment of troops from both sides in the European part.


              RG from 29-05-2020. French parliamentarians propose to start negotiations on restoring control over conventional arms in Europe. This was announced on Friday by the head of the Federation Council committee on international affairs Konstantin Kosachev during the discussion of a joint report on the state of Russian-French relations, which is being prepared by the senators of the two countries.
              "The document contains an appeal to the French colleagues to immediately begin negotiations on the restoration of the conventional arms control regime in Europe," RIA Novosti quotes Kosachev.
              He recalled that the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) was ratified by Russia and three other states, but not a single NATO member country ever got him through parliament.

              Unilateral agreement? This is something new.
              1. 0
                April 2 2021 15: 20
                Therefore, we send everyone to eroticheskoe. And the coolest thing in Europe, no one remembers this anymore, because we will have to keep the answer in front of the voters.
            3. +1
              April 2 2021 16: 14
              He is the world champion in patience! It's just some kind of patience!
              1. -3
                April 2 2021 16: 28
                Are you talking about Biden? And what do you want from a muhamor who does not know what seas wash Ukraine.
  5. +3
    April 2 2021 14: 20
    We will not leave Ukraine alone with the enemy.

    This must be understood as, they will find free hands, the same Balts ... who will harness ... the states are not accustomed to raking in the heat with someone else's hands ...
  6. +7
    April 2 2021 14: 22
    They remember Czechoslovakia and Poland there in their time. Until the cock itself pecked, they did not move.
    1. +2
      April 2 2021 14: 36
      Well, the United States did not take on such a responsibility. But France and Great Britain took it. And they washed their hands at the very moment when it was possible to stop Hitler.
  7. 0
    April 2 2021 14: 25
    [quote] ... if US troops or NATO forces appear on the territory of Ukraine, this will lead to a further increase in tensions at the Russian borders.
    [/ Quote]
    This will be a serious challenge, which must be answered seriously. [/ Quote]
    Well, here is the comment of the Kremlin, and they are aware that the instructors of the United States and NATO have been there for a long time.
    1. +3
      April 2 2021 14: 39
      It seems that we have had such a tradition at all times. Create all imaginable and inconceivable difficulties for your country. And then successfully solve them with the help of Russian blood.
      1. 0
        April 2 2021 15: 40
        Quote: 210ox
        It seems that we have had such a tradition at all times. Create all imaginable and inconceivable difficulties for your country. And then successfully solve them with the help of Russian blood.

        There from ours and ours, only the name.
      2. -3
        April 2 2021 16: 17
        Sechin, Miler, Gref, Rotenberg are not rushing Putin! Panic early (((:
        1. -2
          April 2 2021 16: 40
          They have their own liners, naturally acquired by honest labor, if something happens to the words ichthyandra ..... wave your hand =)
  8. +5
    April 2 2021 14: 26
    To promise does not mean to marry. In due time Onea and Georgia promised something.
    1. 0
      April 2 2021 15: 13
      Then there was not such a critical situation in the world, including for the United States. Again, they thought to settle with the Russian Federation on the "good", China was not so disobedient and impudent, the Turks, etc. The United States has nowhere to retreat, and soon everyone will start sending them.
      1. +2
        April 2 2021 15: 46
        Quote: Reiter
        Then there was not such a critical situation in the world, including for the United States. Again, they thought to settle with the Russian Federation on a "good" basis,

        There have been critical situations in the world throughout history, so what? Are you from the General Staff writing your opinion here?
        1. -1
          April 2 2021 16: 07
          Then there was a different situation. Different situations dictate different reactions, not the same reaction. Then even the President of the United States was different, by the way.
  9. -3
    April 2 2021 14: 41
    Time to start. Then it will be worse, then there will be patriots, and these are losses in the air force
  10. +3
    April 2 2021 14: 51
    And who will protect the United States from Russian aggression? Didn't they think?
    1. -4
      April 2 2021 14: 58
      I.e? The Russians will attack the Americans who are not even on the territory of the DPR-LPR, but in the rest of Ukraine, at the invitation of the "legitimate" (I think not legal, but the Kremlin thinks otherwise, who is his doctor now) of the Ukrainian government?
      1. 0
        April 2 2021 15: 11
        Quote: Reiter
        I.e? Russians will attack Americans who are not even on the territory of the DPR-LPR, but in the rest of Ukraine

        Required!
      2. 0
        April 2 2021 22: 29
        The Russians will attack the Americans in America (they are making movies and games about this, preparing for the occupation by the Mongol Tatars), you probably remember about the "decision-making centers"?
        1. -1
          April 3 2021 02: 50
          Can't wait to unleash a world war? Are you writing from the trench already? And in 2014, statements like yours were severely minus here, and it was these two sentences that I wrote from above that were the main response to the reproach about not taking Marik and other imperfections on the Ukrainian front. But now it would be much simpler, more likely this situation would not have happened if Poroshenko had not been recognized and then acted more decisively. It was just that at the top they were not afraid of the world, they were afraid of grandmothers and other nishtyaks to lose, so they scared the world, and when they were given to understand that they would still be dealt with because of the bad, they forgot about the wars, and started talking about the decision-making centers themselves. Earlier it had to be said, earlier, in 2014.
          1. 0
            April 3 2021 12: 46
            No need for fairy tales about 2014, everything is not easier once. Here, even in the Crimea, "Ukrainianship" has not been completely cured, it still comes across. And the final solution of the Ukrainian question is too expensive for Russia to work independently. Not Crimea and not convoys to Donbass. And all 146 packages of sanctions are not extended in time with import substitution and blocking of the cart, but at once. And the aching Ukrainians that their bloody Rashka did not let them into the EU, otherwise they would panu and by 2020 would already be the second France. Yeah. And THIS came true. laughing So they boil a frog in their own juice, when they genocide themselves to the historical number of Mazepa's times and only then will the Kremlin begin to think whether they are worthy of a new colonization. Or let the states die.
            1. -1
              April 3 2021 15: 35
              The whole steal is not necessary in 2014, but Marik had to, without the currency from metallurgy, they would quickly start scratching their turnips. In addition, the corridor to Crimea is overland, this is a saving of 50 billion on the bridge and the canal also had to be seized, there would be no problems with water, the rest would be boiled in its juice further, the cooking time would be less. And as for the svidomites in the Crimea, so they are in Russia itself to the fig, you still have to fight them this way and that.
              1. 0
                April 3 2021 16: 01
                The bridge is the savings in weather management for the ferry crossing.
      3. 0
        April 2 2021 23: 17
        Foreign mercenaries are primarily hunted, like last time. If Green starts, I don't think he'll be pardoned as a tie-eating.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  11. -5
    April 2 2021 15: 18
    American troops in Europe are on high alert.
    As an option, get in the near future not NATO, but purely American and British bases near the southwestern borders
    1. -1
      April 2 2021 15: 21
      How not to remember the already missed 2014 year. sad Then, with sober heads, all this sad prospect was miscalculated, but someone considered it nonsense.
    2. -3
      April 2 2021 15: 42
      Quote: Dimid
      American troops in Europe are on high alert.
      As an option, get in the near future not NATO, but purely American and British bases near the southwestern borders

      So what? Take Georgia, the whole country is a solid base for the United States and England. What is the result?
      1. -6
        April 2 2021 15: 49
        And where did you see foreign military bases there?
        1. -4
          April 2 2021 15: 57
          Quote: Dimid
          And where did you see foreign military bases there?

          yes there is the whole country in fact = a military base. Tribal extinctions. border with the Russian Federation, Poland. So what?
          1. -3
            April 2 2021 16: 12
            And what NATO military units are stationed in Georgia on a permanent or rotational basis?
            1. +1
              April 3 2021 12: 59
              Quote: Dimid
              And what NATO military units are stationed in Georgia on a permanent or rotational basis?

              Well, let's do this ... Poland, the Baltic states, are NATO members? Border with Russia? If they enter and border, then what with what you write here?
              As an option, get in the near future not NATO, but purely American and British bases near the southwestern borders

              I'll say it again, so what ??!
              There will be a war with Ukraine, there won't be. It is a NATO-oriented and hostile country towards Russia. This also applies to Georgia. NATO bases already border on Russia directly. Why is your opus about NATO bases here? Huh? They are already there. request
          2. -4
            April 2 2021 16: 16
            The difference is that Georgia no longer wants to attack Abkhazia and Ossetia. These republics are officially recognized by Russia and the Russian military are officially stationed there. And can you have data on the bases of the United States, Britain in Georgia? And the situation with Donbass is different. And the bases of the United States and Britain are openly building in Ukraine.
            1. +1
              April 3 2021 13: 02
              Quote: Reiter
              The difference is that Georgia no longer wants to attack Abkhazia and Ossetia.

              Where did you get this ?! Georgia wants to, but cannot yet. And these are two big differences. wink
              1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        April 2 2021 22: 32
        It’s especially scary for the British bases, it will happen there, like in Porton Down, and then RChBZ will sterilize them.
  12. 0
    April 2 2021 15: 34
    Pop to Ukraine ...
    1. +2
      April 2 2021 16: 14
      It was the 7th year ...
      1. 0
        April 2 2021 23: 24
        It was the 7th year ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  13. 0
    April 2 2021 16: 39
    In the meantime, the US troops were brought to increased combat readiness, because of the "activity of the Russian troops." Well, what if we climb off the sofas tomorrow?
  14. 0
    April 2 2021 17: 26
    Russia will protect its citizens.
    Peskov: Russia will respond to NATO in case of strengthening the grouping around Ukraine

    https://www.n-kurs.ru/news/armiya-i-flot/peskov-rossiya-dast-otvet-nato-v-sluchae-usileniya-gruppirovki-vokrug-ukrainy
    1. -6
      April 2 2021 17: 39
      But Peskov also said the following in the same place: "As for the participation of Russian troops in the armed conflict on the territory of Ukraine, Russian troops have never taken part in it. And they do not. This is an exclusively internal Ukrainian conflict."
  15. +1
    April 2 2021 17: 46
    Comrade Stalin would say: "NATO wants a big war, they will get it." I wonder what NATO would have answered. After all, he did not throw words into the wind and everyone knew it.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. -1
    April 2 2021 18: 27
    In Ukraine, a chest is buried under a spreading oak tree. In the chest there is a hare, in a hare - a duck, in a duck - an egg, in an egg - a needle: the death of Kashcheev!
  18. +3
    April 2 2021 19: 13
    Yes, the rules are already ... Well, it seems so ukram. Zelensky spoke on the phone with Biden for almost an hour ...
    Damn, one sting, another stroke, a couple got together ...
  19. 0
    April 2 2021 20: 44
    In 2014, it was necessary to be a little more decisive, the Georgians were driven away! , the Georgians lost, they gave the Nazi evil spirits're coming out to raise their heads, the Ukrainian (Russian people lost) lost. They flooded the government MIMO - Shevtsy, about everything and nothing (Griboyedov diplomacy, .. he finished badly (the Persians tore apart)). As long as our leaders have children and assets abroad, we will continue to surrender the Russian world ... I will go and re-read the results, theses and conclusions of the last United Russia Congress !!!
    1. -3
      April 2 2021 20: 56
      I would like to write the phrase: "Stalin would come here" to deal with the situation, but even he did not have time to the 41st.
  20. +7
    April 2 2021 21: 56
    if US troops or NATO forces appear on Ukrainian territory, this will lead to a further increase in tensions along the Russian borders.

    They're already there! In the form of instructors and other scumbags.
  21. 0
    April 3 2021 00: 15
    Quote: marchcat
    Verbal promises, on the American side, cost no more than the cost of a phone call.

    God forbid! but outwardly it looks really serious .. a little provocation, and off you go! ((
  22. -1
    April 3 2021 00: 58
    Quote: Reiter
    I don't know what will have to happen for the answer.

    Withdrawal of assets (securities) of the Russian Federation from the USA, export of relatives of ministers from Israel, Britain, America.
    Waiver of $.
  23. 0
    April 3 2021 02: 10
    Ehhh, well, what an answer .. I remember that at the very beginning of the Syrian operation, you also wanted to fit in and in the Mediterranean Sea they were even going to carry out "exercises" with launches of balichtic missiles .. It was then that there was a normal adequate statement that conducting exercises could have a catastrophic effect on ecology of the region. And as soon as it was cut off. True, this is not Peskov, but Shoigu said. Maybe even now he should mention something like that in passing ... Like "the appearance of NATO troops can lead to an overabundance of heat in the capitals of NATO countries." Global warming, go it there to the left
  24. +1
    April 3 2021 04: 07
    I read it on "Echo of Moscow" ... The war will write off everything.
  25. 0
    April 3 2021 05: 28
    Quote: Reiter
    I remember this incident, and it’s just not in favor of the situation for Donbass. To begin with, the United States in Syria is not legally and not enough, they attacked and killed Russian citizens within a few hours. So Russia did not answer there. And then he will answer? Will answer what? Here, the United States will be legally in full right. Moreover, Russia will probably not answer here. I don't know what will have to happen for the answer.

    In Ukraine, too, US citizens disappeared (a whole group at once) at the very beginning of the conflict. No ends have been found so far.
  26. -1
    April 3 2021 05: 37
    Quote: Reiter
    DPR-LPR are not recognized as states. Of course they can, but this will hardly give Russia any legal advantages, or rather, the position of the United States is more concrete here. What the Russian Federation would have helped a lot is non-recognition of the regime in Kiev. But a catastrophic mistake happened, Putin recognized Poroshenko, and then, in fact, recognized Zelensky, although there were formal reasons for non-recognition. I don't understand how many people in the Kremlin can jump on the same rake. They are constantly thrown, but they do not change tactics, they only have a reflection on events.

    Protection of citizens of the Russian Federation. Don't give a damn about the "legal pluses". When it is necessary, no one cares. In Georgia, they also thought that the US positions there were more concrete. An, no. Did not help.
    1. -1
      April 3 2021 15: 40
      Yes, I’m all for, at least we need to look at these conventions, we are playing with a global sharper who constantly changes the rules by himself and therefore will never win against him, so to hell with the rules, we do what is best for ourselves.
  27. 0
    April 3 2021 13: 49
    Time on the outskirts is in favor of the Russian Federation. But! The provocation of the provocation will come later. And it will be 100 pounds. But who is the first - that and the slippers. If a fight is imminent ...
  28. +1
    April 3 2021 16: 42
    More than once I was convinced that Putin rarely says something just like that. It is not for nothing that he suddenly started talking about new types of missiles that have no analogues in the world, and from which there is currently no way to hide. And about strikes on the decision-making centers for a reason. He who has ears will hear
    and will understand. The only fear is that in the Fashington Politburo decisions may be made by neoconservatives who are divorced from reality, who have crept into an error in their calculations and our responses. But this is unlikely. Most likely, they will act as usual - they will send their six to the country of boo (former Ukraine) for war / for the slaughter. And they themselves will raise a howl and will, under sanctions and other tinsel, squeeze out their interests around the world. In my opinion, if bu jumps on LiDNR, then this time it will be necessary to resolve the issue radically - Kharkiv, Mariupol, Odessa, Nikolaev should become part of Novorossiya.
  29. 0
    April 3 2021 18: 58
    Quote: Tank Hard
    Quote: Reiter
    The difference is that Georgia no longer wants to attack Abkhazia and Ossetia.

    Where did you get this ?! Georgia wants to, but cannot yet. And these are two big differences. wink

    Wants / does not want, can / cannot, they are determined by the time interval of reality, and they are also relative in terms of different political forces of Georgia or another country, some political forces may not want to at all, realizing that it is better to do without the Abkhazian crap. But what does it mean can not attack, can. That, it does not have an army at all, it seems to be, they even recently repaired a su-25, but only after the attack Georgia will immediately receive it, and quite fatally. Because she does not want to attack, I wrote everything correctly. I can explain, there is such a phrase; "discourage every desire." Russia has repulsed this desire, did not destroy the instrument itself - with what to attack, but demotivated it.
    1. 0
      April 3 2021 21: 36
      Quote: Reiter
      did not destroy the instrument itself

      Is this about the United States? It's difficult for now ... But the water wears away the stone .. wink
  30. 0
    April 5 2021 10: 42
    The promises of the United States, both written and even more so verbal, are not worth the time to read or listen to.