Military Review

Container ship that blocked traffic in the Suez Canal was taken aground

126

There are reports that the 440-meter container ship, which blocked the passage through the Suez Canal a few days ago, has been floated. It is reported that the huge vessel, after partial unloading, is afloat, but it has not left the waterway itself. After all, if the container ship was unloaded (albeit partially), now it is necessary to load everything back or use other ships to transport the cargo that was transported by Ever Given.


The ship was sailing from China to the Netherlands.

Let's remind that the container ship belongs to one of the Japanese companies. It is noted that the company may receive claims for huge amounts of damages from at least the Egyptian operators of the channel. The Egyptian treasury with the blocked Suez Canal was losing $ 130 million per day. The losses of the world economy per day were estimated at up to $ 10 billion. Previously, experts assumed that the total losses due to the incident would amount to about USD 200-250 billion.

At the moment, there are at least 370 different vessels in the "traffic jam" at the channel entrances. Most of them are tankers.

Earlier it was reported that because of the transport route blocked by the container ship, problems arose in the US naval forces. The command had to change logistics to carry out operations of the 6th fleet.

It is reported that the container ship was removed from the aground after a dredging operation in the Suez Canal, which was carried out for several days.
126 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. aleks neym_2
    aleks neym_2 29 March 2021 07: 45
    +9
    This is already pleasing, the guys have worked - to pull off such a colossus! Well done!
    1. Flooding
      Flooding 29 March 2021 07: 49
      +22
      Quote: aleks neym_2
      This is already pleasing, the guys have worked - to pull off such a colossus! Well done!

      removed early
      too hasty
      1. Doccor18
        Doccor18 29 March 2021 08: 08
        +2
        Quote: Flood
        Quote: aleks neym_2
        This is already pleasing, the guys have worked - to pull off such a colossus! Well done!

        removed early
        too hasty

        But what is it, hurry up ...
        It's time to close the company. Even if you sell it all, down to the last printer, the losses cannot be reimbursed ...
        1. Flooding
          Flooding 29 March 2021 08: 11
          +15
          Quote: Doccor18
          But what is it, hurry up ...
          It's time to close the company. Even if you sell it all, down to the last printer, the losses cannot be reimbursed ...

          what does it have to do with it?
          who cares about a company other than its owners?
          I'm talking about changes in transport logistics that began after the incident
          It is high time to unload Suez and fully load alternative routes
          1. Olgovich
            Olgovich 29 March 2021 09: 26
            0
            Quote: Flood
            It is high time to unload Suez and fully load alternative routes

            And, first of all, the Northern Sea Route!

            In addition, Turkey seems to have finally decided on the construction of the 2nd, parallel, channel.
            1. hydrox
              hydrox 29 March 2021 09: 48
              0
              There is a good offer to the Sultan :: for a reasonable price to make and explode fifty 100-kilotons - a gorgeous waterway could turn out
            2. Cosm22
              Cosm22 29 March 2021 09: 48
              +2
              And what, in fact, hinders?
              Download SMP?
              Presumably, customers are already lined up?
              Is there no end to those who want to?
              1. Sarboz
                Sarboz 29 March 2021 12: 51
                -5
                Quote: Cosm22
                And what, in fact, hinders?
                Download SMP?
                Presumably, customers are already lined up?
                Is there no end to those who want to?

                Is not it so? Why, then, have the American Navy been queuing for passage along the Northern Sea Route since the year 2019? They want to restore freedom of navigation. But until they can "swim" in any way, the queue has not come in two years. It floats, right? crying soldier
            3. Vasilenko Vladimir
              Vasilenko Vladimir 29 March 2021 10: 15
              +3
              Quote: Olgovich
              And, first of all, the Northern Sea Route!

              will you personally conduct the caravans?
              if everything would be so wonderful it would have been all over there for a long time
              1. Olgovich
                Olgovich 29 March 2021 11: 14
                -2
                Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                will you personally conduct the caravans?

                belay find out that the SMP long known and used and it will do even without you.

                Today, the development and operation of the Northern Sea Route is in full swing. The Northern Sea Route is most often used by such companies as: Lukoil, Norilsk Nickel, Rosneft, Gazprom, Rosshelf, Chukotka, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Sakha Republic (c).
                Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                if if everything is so wonderful it would have been a long time since everyone passed there

                how - "so wonderful"? What are you arguing with and what are you refuting? belay
                1. Doccor18
                  Doccor18 29 March 2021 11: 35
                  +6
                  Quote: Olgovich
                  The most frequently used Northern Sea Route are such companies as: Lukoil, Norilsk Nickel, Rosneft, Gazprom, Rosshelf ...

                  In fact of the matter. All these are Russian companies that produce hydrocarbons and export them in those parts ...
                  And we are talking about the global, international transit of goods. In the foreseeable future, the NSR will not be able to replace the Suez route. The reasons are darkness.
                  1. Olgovich
                    Olgovich 29 March 2021 12: 01
                    -1
                    Quote: Doccor18
                    In fact of the matter. All these are Russian companies that produce hydrocarbons and export them in those parts.

                    you do not know: already in 2011, 34 courts of the court passed through it andfrom Europe to Asia
                    Quote: Doccor18
                    And we are talking about the global, international transit of goods. In foreseeable future The NSR will not be able to replace the Suez route... The reasons are darkness.

                    What are you saying?

                    And someone argued ... the opposite?

                    But the reasons for the development of the NSR are also darkness: therefore, the 2012 Law on the NSR was adopted and the NSR Administration was created, icebreakers and infrastructure were being built, and the cargo traffic increased by almost 10 times in 10 years.
                    1. Doccor18
                      Doccor18 29 March 2021 12: 20
                      +9
                      Quote: Olgovich
                      ..already in 2011, 34 courts passed through it from Europe to Asia

                      It's a lot???
                      And through the Suez Canal - 17799 (in the same 2011) ...

                      Quote: Olgovich
                      But the reasons to develop the NSR are also darkness.

                      Who's arguing? As it should be. First of all, with the aim of developing the Russian North.
                      However, it is clearly premature to talk about the NSR as a possible alternative to the main sea transport arteries.
                      1. Olgovich
                        Olgovich 29 March 2021 12: 27
                        -3
                        Quote: Doccor18
                        It's a lot???
                        And through the Suez Canal - 17799 (in the same 2011) ..

                        Few!!! And who claimed that ... "a lot"?
                        Quote: Doccor18
                        However, talking about the NSR as possible alternative to the main maritime transport arteries, is now clearly premature.


                        about the possible, it's about time, especially after the accident in the Suez Canal.

                        And Russia is working on this on the basis of the 2012 NSR law and the fleet construction program
                    2. Vasilenko Vladimir
                      Vasilenko Vladimir 29 March 2021 14: 17
                      +2
                      Quote: Olgovich
                      you don’t know: already in 2011 there were 34 courts

                      who was TESTED ?! laughing
                      a total of 16-19 thousand ships pass through the Suez Canal in a year
                      1. Olgovich
                        Olgovich 29 March 2021 14: 29
                        -4
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        whom JUDGED?!

                        learn the declension of the word "ship" in the plural and there will be no stupid questions.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        a total of 16-19 thousand ships pass through the Suez Canal in a year

                        And?
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        from 3 to 34?

                        with 3 million tone up to 32 million т
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        do not specify the navigation period and cargo traffic?

                        no.
                      2. Vasilenko Vladimir
                        Vasilenko Vladimir 29 March 2021 14: 54
                        +3
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        learn the declension of the word "ship" in the plural and there will be no stupid questions.

                        so learn
                        "34 trials have passed" this is a conversation about trials
                        but correctly "34 vessels passed in transit along the Northern Sea Route."
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        from 3 million tons to 32 million tons

                        this is the channel's cargo traffic for two weeks
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        no.

                        that's when you learn to analyze information then you will be clever,
                        and then your RI was at the pinnacle of industrial power in 13 years, then the Northern Sea Route can replace the Suez tomorrow
                      3. Olgovich
                        Olgovich 29 March 2021 15: 19
                        -5
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        so learn
                        "34 trials have passed" this is a conversation about trials
                        that's right "34 courtAT passed in transit along the Northern Sea Route.

                        go to primary school, 3rd grade and learn about
                        the declension of the word "Ship" in the plural (or here-http: //sklonenie-slova.ru/sudno):

                        the word "ship"

                        Case Word Question
                        nominative Who, what? vessels
                        genitive Whom, what? sudo
                        dative To whom, what? courts
                        accusative Whom, what? vessels
                        instrumental By whom, with what?
                        courts
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        this is the channel's cargo traffic for two weeks

                        And?
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        that's when you learn analyze information then you will be clever,

                        when will you learn to distinguish your speculations from analysts, then you will advise.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        otherwise you have a sevmorput can replace tomorrow suetz

                        otherwise you already have hallucinations, ship lol
                      4. Flooding
                        Flooding 29 March 2021 19: 06
                        0
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        go to primary school, 3rd grade and learn about
                        the declension of the word "Ship" in the plural (or here-http: //sklonenie-slova.ru/sudno)

                        I think this is that rare option when both options are correct
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        speculations

                        what a good word
                      5. Olgovich
                        Olgovich 30 March 2021 07: 41
                        0
                        Quote: Flood
                        I think this is that rare option when both options are correct

                        official The guide gives an unambiguous interpretation of the declension of the word vessel:

                        - in the singularthe letter "n" is present in all declensions,
                        - in plural -no in all.

                        Honestly, I myself was convinced of the correctness of the declension before writing, having looked into it. ...
                        Quote: Flood
                        speculations

                        what a good word

                        and, most importantly, accurate. but in dictionaries it is not ...
                      6. Flooding
                        Flooding 30 March 2021 08: 09
                        0
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        official The guide gives an unambiguous interpretation of the declension of the word vessel:

                        - in the singular, the letter "n" is present in all declensions,
                        - in the plural, absent in all.

                        the etymology of the word "vessel" as "container, vessel" is similar to that of the English "vessel"
                        or French. vaisseau "ship" from lat. vascellum "small vessel"
                        hence, by the way, and the "vessel"

                        I know about the peculiarities of the formation of plural forms in some nouns in Russian.
                      7. Olgovich
                        Olgovich 30 March 2021 08: 20
                        0
                        Quote: Flood
                        I know about the peculiarities of the formation of plural forms in some nouns in Russian

                        No doubt.

                        But the letters "n" in the plural. number of words. the ship is not in the official directories.
                      8. Flooding
                        Flooding 30 March 2021 08: 28
                        0
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        But the letters "n" in the plural. number of words. the ship is not in the official directories.

                        of course, because the official educational literature simplifies the language to facilitate learning and understanding. this is normal practice
                        in this sense, Dahl's dictionary is much more interesting, tk. makes it possible to understand the diversity of the language
                      9. Olgovich
                        Olgovich 30 March 2021 11: 59
                        -2
                        Quote: Flood
                        in this sense, Dahl's dictionary is much more interesting, tk. makes it possible to understand the diversity of the language

                        Dahl's dictionary:
                        Ship (pl... ships, ships), a navigable vessel, river or sea, rowing or sailing, or steam: transport, merchant, industrial or military; wooden or iron, Volzhsk. a vessel, any floating structure, for moving on it through the water. Ships inland swimming

                        Источник: https://gufo.me/dict/dal/%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B0

                        -also without the letter "n"
                      10. Flooding
                        Flooding 30 March 2021 13: 06
                        0
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        dictionary dahl

                        it's much more interesting there
                        read the whole article
                        and don't forget about the dishes
                      11. Olgovich
                        Olgovich 30 March 2021 13: 10
                        -2
                        Quote: Flood
                        it's much more interesting there
                        read the whole article
                        and don't forget about the dishes

                        I read everything, of course.

                        But we are talking specifically about the marine "courtah"(without" n "

                        The ship (pl. COURT, SHIPS)
                      12. Flooding
                        Flooding 30 March 2021 13: 17
                        0
                        but the interest is precisely the fact that the dishes were called courts.
                        That is, taking into account the origin of the word and the complete consonance in the past, we can say that the ship (nautical) in the plural was named according to the rules of declension of dishes.
                        But after some time, a consonant fell out of the root. As it happens when making decisions from above.
                        I do not assert, I argue.
                        For complete confidence, you need to dig up to the time the word appears in this meaning in the Russian language.
                        Perhaps this is the time of Peter the Great.
                        Since the thought of borrowing terminology from Europe suggests itself.
                        For the sake of interest, I will look in the internet for documents of that time.
                      13. Olgovich
                        Olgovich 30 March 2021 13: 20
                        -3
                        Quote: Flood
                        but the interest is precisely the fact that the dishes were called courts.
                        That is, taking into account the origin of the word and the complete consonance in the past, we can say that the ship (nautical) in the plural was named according to the rules of declension of dishes.
                        But after some time, a consonant fell out of the root. As it happens when making decisions from above.
                        I do not assert, I argue.
                        For complete confidence, you need to dig up to the time the word appears in this meaning in the Russian language.
                        Perhaps this is the time of Peter the Great.
                        Since the thought of borrowing terminology from Europe suggests itself.
                        For the sake of interest, I will look on the Internet for documents of that time

                        guesswork maybe mass.

                        But the fact remains - no "n" adopted no rules
                      14. Flooding
                        Flooding 30 March 2021 13: 30
                        0
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        But the fact remains - there are no "n" according to the accepted rules

                        the fact is that there is no such rule
                        it is just customary to write, from the category of "remember as an exception"
                        because in Russian, when writing, they adhere not to the phonetic (as I hear), but to the morphological principle.
                        The morpheme in this case is the root "ship".
                        And according to the morphological principle of writing, it would be correct to write in the plural "ship".
                        But by mutual consent, the phoneme "n" drops out.
                        This is not following a rule, but a peculiarity of the spelling of a given word.
                      15. Olgovich
                        Olgovich 30 March 2021 13: 57
                        -3
                        Quote: Flood
                        the fact is that there is no such rule
                        it is just customary to write, from the category of "remember as an exception"

                        there is a common rule write that particular word exactly.

                        What was the reason is not important
                        Quote: Flood
                        because in Russian, when writing, they adhere not to the phonetic (as I hear), but to the morphological principle.

                        where does ... phonetic principle? belay

                        On it, moreover, it is NOT possible to throw out "n" - this is not "a / o, d / t"

                        and yes, the mass of modern spelling was formed under the influence of phonetic laws
                      16. Flooding
                        Flooding 30 March 2021 14: 16
                        0
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        where does ... phonetic principle?

                        On it, moreover, it is NOT possible to throw out "n" - this is not "a / o, d / t"

                        that is why he wrote that phonetics is not dominant in Russian spelling
                      17. Olgovich
                        Olgovich 31 March 2021 08: 13
                        -2
                        Quote: Flood
                        exactly therefore, I wrote that in Russian spelling is not dominated by phonetics

                        WHY did you mention him? belay

                        He in no way explained the reasons for the absence / presence of the letter N. As well as the morphological principle.

                        Bottom line: yes rule write the word ship in plural number of without the letter n.

                        There are no other options.

                        Everything on that.

                        Good luck!
                      18. Flooding
                        Flooding 31 March 2021 08: 55
                        0
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        WHY did you mention him?

                        He in no way explained the reasons for the absence / presence of the letter N. As well as the morphological principle.

                        so that you remember it better
                        now you have learned about both the morpheme and the phoneme
                        joke, but with a grain of truth
                        four minuses from here and put up, too, for the sake of a joke
                        I'll clean it up later, after learning the lesson
                      19. Olgovich
                        Olgovich 31 March 2021 09: 55
                        -2
                        Quote: Flood
                        so that you remember it better
                        now you have learned about both the morpheme and the phoneme
                        joke, but with a grain of truth

                        lol
                        You are funny: you are embarrassed with Vasilenko, and you are trying to build a muzzle.
                        Quote: Flood
                        four minuses from here and put up, too, for the sake of a joke
                        I'll clean it up later, after learning the lesson

                        I am sure that you already hacked on their forehead correct declension of the word "ship" in plural. number, as well as the fact that your empty, not related to the subject, speculations unable to change it
                      20. Flooding
                        Flooding 31 March 2021 10: 03
                        0
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        You are funny: you are embarrassed with Vasilenko, and you are trying to build a muzzle.

                        what is the embarrassment?
                        that I look a little further than the rules taught in school?
                        it says a lot about the face, you get off the school bench already
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        I am sure that you have already hacked into your forehead the correct declension of the word "ship" in plural. number, as well as the fact that your empty, not related to the subject, mockery, cannot change this

                        I'm glad you are fluent in the search engine
                        it's time to take the next step and learn how to organize and analyze the results suggested by the Internet

                        so far, you have not caught me on the falsity of my comments or any contradictions in them
                        and as for the inconvenience caused to you, it is solely related to your abilities
                        I will not compete with you in the discipline of "mortification"
                        you haven't learned the lesson
                      21. Olgovich
                        Olgovich 31 March 2021 10: 47
                        -2
                        Quote: Flood
                        what is the embarrassment?
                        in that looking a little further than the rulestaught in school?

                        pierced the thickness of time? lol

                        The confusion is that your:
                        I think this is that rare option when both options are correct
                        turned out to be untrue, which was proven to you.

                        Then, in an attempt to get out, you began ridiculous, awkward jumps to the sides: to the Dahl dictionary, to the phonetic principle (no sideways, as shown, irrelevant)

                        Quote: Flood
                        я gladthat you are fluent in the search engine


                        belay I don't care about your "" joys, "I don't need them.
                        Quote: Flood
                        so far, you have not caught me on the falsity of my comments or any contradictions in them

                        see above
                        Quote: Flood
                        and as for the inconvenience caused to you, it is solely related to your abilities

                        what disadvantages are you? You have entertained me.
                        Quote: Flood
                        you haven't learned the lesson

                        and what "lesson", I wonder, can "teach" ... an ignoramus?

                        Lesson illiteracy apparently ... hi
                      22. Flooding
                        Flooding 31 March 2021 10: 59
                        +2
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        turned out to be untrue, which was proven to you

                        what an uncluttered primitivism
                        you do not even understand what I was crucifying so much?
                        the easier it is for you, the better?
                        and didn't even get the meaning of the words you just quoted?
                        Quote: Flood
                        I think this is that rare option when both options are correct

                        this may not be clear to you
                        not in your habits
                        but I reasoned
                        Quote: Flood
                        I do not assert, I argue.

                        but I admit that simplification is acceptable and sometimes necessary
                        simplification helps mass formation
                        so I'm definitely not on my way with you
                      23. Olgovich
                        Olgovich April 1 2021 08: 17
                        0
                        Quote: Flood
                        what an uncluttered primitivism
                        you do not even understand what I was crucifying so much?

                        and what to understand in the emptiness of the drum
                        Quote: Flood
                        this may not be clear to you
                        not in your habits
                        but I reasoned

                        first you argued, then, after a delicate correction by you, you began to "reason."

                        And who, by the way, needs your "reasoning"?
                        Quote: Flood
                        but admitthat simplification is acceptable and sometimes necessary

                        The Russian language, I am sure, will manage without your recognition.

                        simplification helps education the masses
                        so I'm definitely not on my way with you

                        Don't like to study?

                        It's a pity, it would be better:
                        Quote: Flood
                        you gave the opportunity to work your intellect
                        .

                        Quote: Flood
                        you do not pull on the whole blanket of erudition
                        leave Google at least a little

                        This is our "sharp thought", right? lol
                        Quote: Flood
                        by the lesson I meant that you would understand the stupidity of putting down minuses during a completely friendly discussion (until it went beyond that)
                        the hint was nowhere fatter
                        but everything is not good for you

                        the discussion WAS quite comradely to the point of rudeness:
                        that you remember it better
                        now you found out and about the morpheme, and about the phoneme
                        joke, but with a grain of truth
                        If it didn't reach you, that you write, then I feel sorry for you.

                        It will not come to you that, for example, someone who is interested in ukraisnstvo knows about kulishovka, i.e. and about the phonetic principle, and, therefore, about the morphological principle, etc.

                        Before that (according to other articles) I treated you with sincere sympathy and, yes, I was a plus.

                        And now, plus, if you are so worried, get it.
                      24. Flooding
                        Flooding April 1 2021 08: 33
                        0
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        and what to understand in the emptiness of the drum

                        ham
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        first you argued, then, after a delicate correction by you, you began to "reason."

                        babble
                        my first comment
                        Quote: Flood
                        I think, this is the rare case when both are correct

                        I have already figured out the issue of spelling and etymology
                        while you were grimacing
                        if you weren’t a boor, you would talk about business
                        all the best
                        you are an unpleasant interlocutor
                        but I admit that our next discussion will be in a more positive way
                      25. Olgovich
                        Olgovich April 1 2021 09: 49
                        -1
                        Quote: Flood
                        ham

                        no, a metaphor.

                        And here he is again:
                        Quote: Flood
                        what an uncluttered primitivism
                        you didn't even understand
                        .
                        Quote: Flood
                        my first comment
                        Quote: Flood
                        I think, this is that rare option when both are correct option

                        you, as you found out, thought wrong, let's say only one option.
                        Quote: Flood
                        if you weren’t a boor, you would talk about business
                        all the best

                        once again about rudeness, so that you remember better:
                        Quote: Flood
                        so that you remember it better
                        now you have learned about both the morpheme and the phoneme.

                        Lesson.
                        Quote: Flood
                        you unpleasant interlocutor

                        you are a normal interlocutor -but before the manifestation of the above. It is not clear why this is? Self-affirmation?
                        Quote: Flood
                        but I admit that our next discussion will be in a more positive way

                        I think this would be much more interesting and productive.

                        What happened is not my choice.
                      26. Flooding
                        Flooding April 1 2021 09: 52
                        0
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        I think this would be much more interesting and productive.

                        can I be mistaken you are not from Moldova by any chance?
                      27. Olgovich
                        Olgovich April 1 2021 10: 17
                        -1
                        Quote: Flood
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        I think this would be much more interesting and productive.

                        can I be mistaken you are not from Moldova by any chance?

                        from Bessarabia.
                      28. Flooding
                        Flooding April 1 2021 10: 22
                        0
                        Quote: Olgovich
                        from Bessarabia

                        well, this time, let's not sulk at each other, fellow countryman
          2. Flooding
            Flooding 31 March 2021 11: 03
            +2
            Quote: Olgovich
            and what "lesson", I wonder, can "teach" ... an ignoramus?

            you do not pull on the whole blanket of erudition
            leave Google at least a little

            by the lesson I meant that you would understand the stupidity of putting down minuses during a completely friendly discussion (until it went beyond that)
            the hint was nowhere fatter
            but everything is not good for you
          3. Flooding
            Flooding 31 March 2021 11: 06
            0
            Quote: Olgovich
            A lesson in illiteracy, apparently.

            all this time I was only concerned about increasing the level of your literacy
            Quote: Flood
            the fact is that there is no such rule
            it is just customary to write, from the category of "remember as an exception"
            because in Russian, when writing, they adhere not to the phonetic (as I hear), but to the morphological principle.
            The morpheme in this case is the root "ship".
            And according to the morphological principle of writing, it would be correct to write in the plural "ship".
            But by mutual consent, the phoneme "n" drops out.
            This is not following a rule, but a peculiarity of the spelling of a given word.

            after such a blatant ingratitude, waste time on the first
          4. Flooding
            Flooding 31 March 2021 11: 08
            +2
            Quote: Olgovich

            what disadvantages are you? You entertained me

            it would be better if you gave the opportunity to work your intellect
  2. Vasilenko Vladimir
    Vasilenko Vladimir 29 March 2021 19: 29
    -1
    in oh you are right as well as me both options are permissible, but only in the matter of declension
  • Vasilenko Vladimir
    Vasilenko Vladimir 29 March 2021 14: 18
    +2
    Quote: Olgovich
    and the freight traffic has grown almost 10 times over 10 years.

    from 3 to 34?
  • Vasilenko Vladimir
    Vasilenko Vladimir 29 March 2021 13: 51
    0
    Quote: Olgovich
    find out that the NSR has long been known and used

    do not specify the navigation period and cargo traffic?
  • Vladimir Mashkov
    Vladimir Mashkov 29 March 2021 11: 27
    +5
    Strange article. It seems that they used to write that they were on board Egyptian Pilot (pilot), who led the ship along the canal and ran aground due to poor visibility in a sandstorm. What can be "egyptian claims for huge amounts "?
    A little bit of a laugh was also made by the "mistake" in the last line: "... the operation to deepen the day in the Suez Canal, which was carried out for several days." smile
  • Bad_gr
    Bad_gr 29 March 2021 12: 03
    +3
    Quote: Olgovich
    And, first of all, the Northern Sea Route!
    And in the second (and possibly in the first) load the BAM, which was shouted about quite recently that it was unprofitable, and its construction was wasted money.
  • Pashhenko Nikolay
    Pashhenko Nikolay 29 March 2021 12: 42
    +1
    The second parallel is being built in the same place. 72 kilometers have already been put into operation. What has Turkey to do with it?
    1. Olgovich
      Olgovich 29 March 2021 14: 47
      -1
      Quote: Pashhenko Nikolay
      . Why is Turkey here?

      its traffic through its Bosphorus is much more intense than in Suez.

      To unload it, the Istanbul Canal was planned (2011, end 2023, but not yet implemented), and the accident in Egypt pushed the Turkish leadership, as stated in the press, to make a final decision on its construction.
  • Vasilenko Vladimir
    Vasilenko Vladimir 29 March 2021 10: 14
    0
    Quote: Flood
    It is high time to unload Suez and fully load alternative routes

    what kind?
    around africa?
    1. Flooding
      Flooding 29 March 2021 10: 37
      +1
      Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
      what kind?
      around africa

      land
      1. Vasilenko Vladimir
        Vasilenko Vladimir 29 March 2021 14: 18
        0
        aaaa
        in the course that it is more expensive and longer?
        1. Flooding
          Flooding 29 March 2021 14: 25
          -2
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          aaaa
          in the course that it is more expensive and longer?

          which route? at what rates? for what cargo? what transport?
          1. Vasilenko Vladimir
            Vasilenko Vladimir 29 March 2021 14: 55
            0
            do you have options ?!
            I'm sorry, but land transport is of two types - railway and auto (I will not take camels into account)
            both will be more expensive by sea and not comparable in volume
            1. Flooding
              Flooding 29 March 2021 15: 27
              -1
              we will assume that you answered one of the four questions with a joke about camels
              the answers to the other three will be even funnier?
  • forty-eighth
    forty-eighth 29 March 2021 10: 49
    +4
    If the carrier is insured, and he is insured in 95% of cases, then the problems are not with him, but with the insurers.
    1. Sarboz
      Sarboz 29 March 2021 12: 57
      +2
      The passage through the Suez seems to be insured in 100% of cases. Insurance companies have a rainy day. Did it smell like a crisis again?
  • alexmach
    alexmach 29 March 2021 12: 32
    +1
    It's time to close the company. Even if you sell it all, down to the last printer, the losses cannot be reimbursed ...

    And the company may well have insurance in such a case.
    They quickly took it off, and did not sit aground for a week, and local commentators had already drawn months of inactivity for him in fantasies.
  • Prisoner
    Prisoner 29 March 2021 08: 17
    0
    The funeral business has broken off! laughing
    1. Galleon
      Galleon 29 March 2021 09: 02
      +5
      good Not even a business - dreams of grandmothers !! fellow
  • halpat
    halpat 29 March 2021 10: 38
    +1
    Quote: Flood
    Quote: aleks neym_2
    This is already pleasing, the guys have worked - to pull off such a colossus! Well done!

    removed early
    too hasty

    Well, not really, and so far removed. Shipping has not been restored.
  • Dart2027
    Dart2027 29 March 2021 18: 47
    0
    Quote: Flood
    removed early

    An article has already been published that he has blocked the channel again.
  • Sergey Obraztsov
    Sergey Obraztsov 29 March 2021 08: 16
    +2
    I agree, they worked there 24/7 at a pace that even McDuck employees never dreamed of :)
  • Maz
    Maz 29 March 2021 17: 18
    0
    The container ship Ever, which was previously managed to float, partially turned around due to strong winds and again stood almost across the Suez Canal, according to Reuters.
  • Cananecat
    Cananecat 29 March 2021 07: 45
    0
    The "dope" on board the container ship is over. ))
  • The leader of the Redskins
    The leader of the Redskins 29 March 2021 07: 47
    +4
    Here you go. Everything turned out to be not as bad as some had predicted.
    1. Volodin
      Volodin 29 March 2021 07: 49
      +7
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Here you go. Everything turned out to be not as bad as some had predicted.

      For capitalists, losing $ 10 billion a day is scary. Now they will "beat back" ...
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 29 March 2021 08: 44
        +2

        Volodin (Alexey)
        Today, 07: 49
        NEW

        +4
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        Here you go. Everything turned out to be not as bad as some had predicted.

        For capitalists losing $ 10 billion a day is scary. Now they will "beat back" ...
        And some of them look at the Colt.
      2. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 29 March 2021 09: 32
        +4
        Quote: Volodin
        For capitalists, losing $ 10 billion a day is scary. Now they will "beat back" ...

        In the maritime business, this is not much money.
        1. The comment was deleted.
      3. New Year day
        New Year day 29 March 2021 09: 53
        0
        Quote: Volodin
        Now they will "beat back" ...

        Will raise prices
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 30 March 2021 09: 23
          0
          Quote: Silvestr
          Will raise prices

          I wonder what the prices will be raised for?
          1. New Year day
            New Year day 30 March 2021 10: 20
            -2
            Quote: tihonmarine
            I wonder what the prices will be raised for?

            For everything, even if it is not related to the Suez! A universal solution to all problems: the government claims that the price of milk has not increased, but in the market, it has increased. Oil price fell, but gasoline price increased again
            1. tihonmarine
              tihonmarine 30 March 2021 10: 25
              0
              Quote: Silvestr
              For everything, even if it is not related to the Suez!

              In the maritime business, everything is different.
              1. New Year day
                New Year day 30 March 2021 10: 33
                -2
                Quote: tihonmarine
                In the maritime business, everything is different.

                He is a business and business in Africa. No one will work to the detriment of themselves
      4. alexmach
        alexmach 29 March 2021 12: 33
        +1
        For capitalists, losing $ 10 billion a day is scary. Now they will "beat back" ...

        Already a day? Why not a second?
    2. Cowbra
      Cowbra 29 March 2021 07: 50
      -2
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Everything turned out to be not as bad as some had predicted.

      Previously, experts assumed that the total losses due to the incident would amount to about USD 200-250 billion.

      ?
      Three annual defense budgets of the Russian Federation just like that - oops - and throw it away. Not to mention the fact that now, for sure, none of the carriers against the Northern Sea Route will fail. This one traffic jam changed geopolitics immediately and irreversibly.
      1. New Year day
        New Year day 29 March 2021 09: 55
        +4
        Quote: Cowbra
        This one traffic jam changed geopolitics immediately and irreversibly.

        You obviously don't know that the Egyptians are digging for the Suez understudy. There is very little left and there will be full 2 ​​channels
        1. Sarboz
          Sarboz 29 March 2021 13: 07
          +3
          Interesting news! With a beard? Already five years ago, we opened a parallel branch - New Suez. Almost half of the entire width of the isthmus. Haven't you heard?
          But so that the backup for the entire 160 km, did not hear such plans.
          1. New Year day
            New Year day 29 March 2021 13: 56
            -1
            Quote: Sarboz
            But so that the backup for the entire 160 km, did not hear such plans.

            Now, do the Egyptians have any doubts about this?
            1. Sarboz
              Sarboz 29 March 2021 14: 51
              0
              Quote: Silvestr
              Now, do the Egyptians have any doubts about this?

              Quite possible. Judging by how quickly the bonds of the previous loan were sold out, I think they can do it.
  • arhitroll
    arhitroll 29 March 2021 07: 50
    +2
    pa-pa-pa presented a precedent

    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 29 March 2021 11: 10
      0
      If there was a KDP from Russia on the bridge, the pension was like that of the President of the United States. So stick it in, it’s necessary to postorate. I didn’t go Suez, But Pan American saw the bridge 4 times.
  • silberwolf88
    silberwolf88 29 March 2021 07: 52
    +7
    eeh ... I would have stood for a week))) ... BUT the demonstration of the "reliability" of Suez took place ... and perhaps some too militant "lovers of building democracy" in the Middle East received the most painful and understandable for them - an economic warning. .. there was already a "tanker war" ... so that they remembered their risks and waved their weapons less there ...
    1. Blackmokona
      Blackmokona 29 March 2021 08: 07
      +4
      What are the risks for them? They have repair and supply bases all over the world
      1. lucul
        lucul 29 March 2021 08: 46
        0
        What are the risks for them? They have repair and supply bases all over the world

        Yes ? Well, try going around Africa instead of going through the Suez. This is to change all logistics at once.
        And I also wondered how terrorists attack completely useless targets when there is Suez. Disable Suez for a month - the effect is far greater than the Twin Towers in America.
        1. Blackmokona
          Blackmokona 29 March 2021 08: 56
          +1
          They swim great all over the world, patrolling the coast of Africa is also part of their job.
        2. Galleon
          Galleon 29 March 2021 08: 56
          +14
          In early November 1956, Egypt sank a couple of ships across the canal and blocked it. This blockage lasted until May 1957. No one died. Due to the six-day war, the canal was blocked and mined from 1967 to 1975. Who remembers this now?
          1. Paranoid50
            Paranoid50 29 March 2021 09: 15
            +2
            Quote: Galleon
            Who remembers this now?

            Yes, remember, remember. As well as who cleared it then. Only 50 years ago, freight flows were not the same.
            1. Galleon
              Galleon 29 March 2021 09: 17
              +6
              Quote: Paranoid50
              Yes, remember, remember. As well as who cleared it then.

              And we, as cadets, sang a song about these cases:
              They didn't sing a guitar song about minesweepers,
              the waves played for us, the winds whistled for us.
              And with this orchestra and trawling crew
              we walked and worked at different latitudes
              ...
          2. lucul
            lucul 29 March 2021 12: 23
            -2
            In early November 1956, Egypt sank a couple of ships across the canal and blocked it. This blockage lasted until May 1957. No one died

            Another one in the forest does not see trees))))
            In 1957, China then was not the number one industrial factory in the world (it became it only in the 90s), and, accordingly, the cargo flow and the 100th part did not make up today.
            And now, take the terrorists, blow up this EVERGREEN container ship passing through the Suez, right in the middle of the canal, so that the ship was torn in half and sank, so that all the containers crumble into the water, blocking the canal - until they remove it, at least a week. And so repeat every month.
            This is if you want to harm the West.
            But the "terrorists" do not go against their masters, and inflict only insignificant injections around the world, instead of full-scale aggression on the main transport artery of the world economy.
            This only suggests that all terrorists are "tame", not independent, and are used only for certain purposes, beneficial to the Zionists - all these Al-Qaeda and so on, so forth, so forth ..
        3. Roma 1977
          Roma 1977 29 March 2021 14: 58
          +1
          The one who gives the terrorists tasks is interested in making things beautiful and people hawala, and not in losing their profits ...
  • Avior
    Avior 29 March 2021 08: 03
    +1
    It is not entirely clear - and there is no pilot on board during the passage of the channel, is there? Logically, there should be a representative of the channel. And, if there was, will the losses be deducted from his salary?
    1. Cube123
      Cube123 29 March 2021 08: 14
      +10
      Quote: Avior
      And, if there was, will the losses be deducted from his salary?

      In one of Charlie Sheen's films, it is well said about this:
      "- It was your fault that a US Air Force fighter was destroyed.
      - I will compensate for the losses. I have $ 12,5 withheld from my salary every month. "
      wassat
      1. Avior
        Avior 29 March 2021 09: 04
        +5
        Yes, and Schwarzenegger, I remember, offered to deduct from his salary if he smashed Harrier. smile
        1. Mordvin 3
          Mordvin 3 30 March 2021 14: 36
          0
          Quote: Avior
          Yes, and Schwarzenegger,

          Which Harrigen?
          1. Avior
            Avior 30 March 2021 15: 17
            +1
            American version
            True lie
    2. Moore
      Moore 29 March 2021 08: 21
      +7
      It is said that the Egyptian pilot was.
      Maybe they will let them down under force majeure - they have already stuttered that the vessel has been deployed due to the windage created by the containers on the deck - a strong wind, then, behold ... Maybe it will partially pass ...
    3. Whisper
      Whisper 29 March 2021 08: 25
      +10
      According to the rules of navigation, the actions of the pilot are advisory in nature. The captain is to blame.
      1. Avior
        Avior 29 March 2021 09: 06
        +4
        I think if the pilot was from among the official Egyptian and the captain performed his commands, then the trial will not be easy.
      2. 16112014nk
        16112014nk 29 March 2021 14: 12
        0
        Quote: Sheptun
        The captain is to blame.

        The "switchman" - the helmsman, will be to blame.
    4. Puppeteer 111
      Puppeteer 111 29 March 2021 08: 37
      +4
      There, according to reports earlier, the ship ran aground due to a very strong wind, and with such a windage it is not surprising.
    5. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 29 March 2021 10: 17
      -1
      Quote: Avior
      and there is no pilot on board when passing the canal?

      is, but it was confused by Russian hackers
  • Free wind
    Free wind 29 March 2021 08: 06
    -13%
    If it was so dangerous, they would have destroyed it right there, with torpedoes, bombs.
    1. loki565
      loki565 29 March 2021 08: 19
      +8
      If it was so dangerous, they would have destroyed it right there, with torpedoes, bombs.

      And he would not have gone anywhere, only he would have been lying at the bottom all full of holes and just blocking the passage. That's how many missiles and torpedoes were spent just to sink a ship that is several times smaller than a container ship
      1. New Year day
        New Year day 29 March 2021 09: 59
        0
        Quote: loki565
        sink a ship

        Well built, how long it withstood!
        1. loki565
          loki565 29 March 2021 10: 39
          +3
          It's just that the rockets are rather weak, the Houthis over there and one was enough.
    2. Piramidon
      Piramidon 29 March 2021 08: 53
      +2
      Quote: Free Wind
      If it was so dangerous, they would have destroyed it right there, with torpedoes, bombs.

      Would a sunken ship be easier to clean than a grounded ship?
  • Professor
    Professor 29 March 2021 08: 07
    -3
    After all, if the container ship was unloaded (albeit partially), now it is necessary to load everything back or use other ships to transport the cargo that was transported by Ever Given.

    Is Islam forbidding to do this in the port by delivering containers there on trailers?
    1. Baloo
      Baloo 29 March 2021 08: 12
      0
      Quote: Professor
      After all, if the container ship was unloaded (albeit partially), now it is necessary to load everything back or use other ships to transport the cargo that was transported by Ever Given.

      Is Islam forbidding to do this in the port by delivering containers there on trailers?

      Are you hinting at the long arms of the Chinese Communist Party, which will now try to take control of the Suez Canal by buying up shares?
      1. Professor
        Professor 29 March 2021 10: 08
        +2
        I hint at the possibility of unloading the vessel on the spot and transporting containers to the nearest port for their further loading on this or another vessel.
  • APASUS
    APASUS 29 March 2021 08: 18
    -3
    I can imagine how much manure would have been poured if this container ship was from Russia.
    1. A. Privalov
      A. Privalov 29 March 2021 10: 18
      +7
      Quote: APASUS
      I can imagine how much manure would have been poured if this container ship was from Russia.

      I already wrote that in 2004 the channel was closed for three days - from 6 to 9 November. Then the Sovcomflot tanker Tropic Brilliance ran aground, carrying more than 140 thousand tons of oil. The oil was pumped into a smaller tanker, the poor fellow was freed from the shallows.
      You haven't even heard of it. Nobody poured anything on anyone. All responded with understanding. hi
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 29 March 2021 11: 32
        0
        Quote: A. Privalov
        I already wrote that in 2004 the channel was closed for three days - from 6 to 9 November. Then the Sovcomflot tanker Tropic Brilliance ran aground, carrying more than 140 thousand tons of oil. The oil was pumped into a smaller tanker, the poor fellow was freed from the shallows.
        You haven't even heard of it. Nobody poured anything on anyone. All responded with understanding.

        The situation has changed !
        Not only that now the reasons for the pressure are sucked out of the thumb, they attribute non-existent crimes, and it would be very strange not to take advantage of the accident.
  • Ros 56
    Ros 56 29 March 2021 08: 26
    +2
    And in vain, it was necessary to fasten it there before the New Year with stretch marks. lol
  • Igor Pa
    Igor Pa 29 March 2021 08: 29
    +1
    The tanker (company) is probably insured. Losses will be borne by banks and stock speculators. The real economy has not suffered the same. Another reason for the bubbles to burst on the stock exchange. Everything is superimposed, the crown is the tanker, the crisis, the war is coming, however.
  • avib
    avib 29 March 2021 09: 28
    -1
    There are many ships carrying livestock in a "traffic jam". There is no possibility of delay on such ships. The cattle stand there like herring in a barrel and, it seems, does not receive any water or food. Yes, it will be an environmental problem.
  • seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 29 March 2021 09: 50
    +7
    Why deepen the day? And how long can you fight with the site administration? Why is it impossible to call a dog a girl by a real world name on this site? Here the boy's dog can be called a male! This is not tolerant, it is gender discrimination. For the rest of the honest readers, I beg your pardon. It boiled. When trying to write, they often block unreasonably
  • A. Privalov
    A. Privalov 29 March 2021 10: 11
    +3
    For those who have forgotten, I will remind you, but for those who did not know, I will just tell you that the Suez Canal in the past was closed for YEARS.

    In 1956, after the Suez Crisis, the canal was partially destroyed and the Egyptians blocked it, sinking 47 ships. As a result, shipping was closed for almost a year.

    The longest stop in traffic on the canal was the period of the Arab-Israeli wars. Then the movement was blocked for eight years - from 1967 to 1975.

    After that, traffic on the Suez Canal periodically stopped due to accidents, but usually the delay was less than a day.
    In 2004, traffic was blocked for three days - from 6 to 9 November. Then the Sovcomflot tanker Tropic Brilliance ran aground, carrying more than 140 thousand tons of oil. Then they had to transfer part of the cargo to a smaller tanker. hi
  • Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 29 March 2021 14: 20
    0
    Quote: aleks neym_2
    This is already pleasing, the guys have worked - to pull off such a colossus! Well done!

    What are you happy about? laughing What took so much time? laughing
  • Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 29 March 2021 14: 32
    0
    Quote: Ros 56
    And in vain, it was necessary to fasten it there before the New Year with stretch marks. lol

    No Houthis will appear there or "other radical fighters against capitalism" will impose underwater landmines on occasion laughing To guard the AUG it is necessary to adjust it. wassat
  • Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 29 March 2021 14: 50
    0
    Quote: Doccor18
    Quote: Flood
    Quote: aleks neym_2
    This is already pleasing, the guys have worked - to pull off such a colossus! Well done!

    removed early
    too hasty

    But what is it, hurry up ...
    It's time to close the company. Even if you sell it all, down to the last printer, the losses cannot be reimbursed ...

    They took off Hurray !!!! And the problems of qualification of pilots, captains, sailors remained laughing
  • Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 29 March 2021 15: 01
    0
    Judging by the picture from the site https://www.myshiptracking.com/ pulled the stern to the fairway laughing With the nose part is not understood. Glory to the "technology" laughing