Blinken said the US will conduct a dialogue with China from a position of strength

140

Another, to put it mildly, unfriendly statements made by US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken against China. Recall that a few days ago Blinken made attacks on China, pointing out that Beijing "violates human rights in Tibet, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Hong Kong." Then, during a direct meeting with representatives of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, the US Secretary of State announced that this "has ceased to be China's internal affairs and has become an international matter."

Today, the head of the US State Department continued his line of confrontation with the PRC. In an interview with CNN journalist Anthony Blinken announced that the United States would conduct a dialogue with China from a position of strength.



Blinken:

More and more areas of confrontation are emerging in our relations with Beijing. But we continue to cooperate on various issues.

Blinken added that Washington will cooperate with China in those areas that directly relate to US interests.

Earlier in Washington, in about the same vein, they announced further cooperation with Russia. If the US is profitable, they cooperate, if there is no benefit, they immediately transfer the "composition" to the sanctions rails.

The US Secretary of State added that Washington intends to develop "a unified position with allies in response to destructive actions and challenges from China." In fact, Blinken made it clear that the United States will continue to spin the anti-Chinese sanctions flywheel.

Earlier, China imposed its sanctions against several citizens of the United States, Canada, Britain and the EU for interfering in the political situation in the PRC. Chinese sanctions were the answer, but Blinken declared that "this is unacceptable." That is, it is acceptable to impose sanctions on China, but it is unacceptable to respond to these sanctions. American logic is the logic of "exclusivity."
140 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +25
    28 March 2021 18: 19
    Blinken said the US will conduct a dialogue with China from a position of strength
    Okay, okay, let's see how they do it ...
    1. +29
      28 March 2021 18: 24
      Quote: rocket757
      Blinken said the US will conduct a dialogue with China from a position of strength
      Okay, okay, let's see how they do it ...

      Yes, it will not work in any way, chatting - do not carry bags! The pancake is clearly inflated, as if not burnt ...
      1. +20
        28 March 2021 18: 28
        Shaw to do ... their most important is not very ... active! His assistants / deputies will have to carry the entire management process on themselves and maintain it in an active-live state.
        Everything was predictable.
        1. +26
          28 March 2021 18: 32
          Now the main thing is not to pile up until the end of the term, Kamala Harris is clearly not an adequate aunt, so you can expect anything from her, especially in relation to China (given her Indian roots).
          1. +26
            28 March 2021 18: 46
            But who will give them to steer there? The bourgeois type of democracy is talking heads on the podium. Absolutely decisive. Decide - saaaavsome other uncles ..
            1. +3
              28 March 2021 19: 27
              Blinken said the US will conduct a dialogue with China from a position of strength

              Oh, is it ?! The United States has nothing more to do than conduct a dialogue with China from a position of strength!
              The United States already has a soft spot on its back from China's retaliatory measures.
              1. +8
                28 March 2021 19: 46
                Blinken said the US will conduct a dialogue with China from a position of strength

                This idiot was not taught at school that dialogue is not from a position of strength, it is a conversation of equals. And the agreement is a product of non-resistance of the parties. "Lavrov-quote"
                1. +10
                  28 March 2021 22: 15
                  China has slowed down the extension of the Treaty on the removal of garbage from the United States.
                  Russia has done the same with the NPP Waste Treaty.
                  And together, with interest, they observe what is there in the States with the "position of strength"?
                  Is it all overgrown or is it still visible?
                  Are you talking about a green agenda? bully
                  1. +2
                    28 March 2021 23: 08
                    Quote: Alex777
                    China has slowed down the extension of the Treaty on the removal of garbage from the United States.
                    Russia has done the same with the NPP Waste Treaty.
                    And together, with interest, they observe what is there in the States with the "position of strength"?
                    Is it all overgrown or is it still visible?
                    Are you talking about a green agenda? bully

                    So let's see
                    1. 0
                      29 March 2021 19: 49
                      All American administrations demand from the world the recognition of their rights of exclusivity. But if the Trump administration did it relatively peacefully, threatening but not starting new wars, then the current administration ... (Biden? Democrats? Harris?) Is ready, it seems, to unleash, in addition to the ongoing in the Middle East, not one war, but both in Europe and Asia. And, as usual, throw them into the front line of the vassals. In Asia, they are trying to use India, and in Europe - Ukraine and the team of Europe's Russophobes. And they themselves routinely threaten everyone who is in the slightest degree independent. First of all - to Russia and China.
          2. +10
            28 March 2021 18: 49
            For us what ... we will look from the outside.
            1. +1
              28 March 2021 20: 52
              All this will come back to haunt us one way or another. But how exactly - there are a lot of options.
              1. +3
                28 March 2021 21: 02
                The question is, before that, we had friendship with the minke and mutual understanding ??? Basically, nothing will change ... it will backfire or something else, it depends on ourselves.
          3. 0
            28 March 2021 19: 32
            Quote: Hunter 2
            Now the main thing is not to pile up until the end of the term, Kamala Harris is clearly not an adequate aunt, so you can expect anything from her, especially in relation to China (given her Indian roots).

            So they are dolls. Puppets. Trump, Biden, Harris ...
            There is no adequate, not adequate difference. What the "sponsors" tell her, he will do it with his hands, and he has no bones in his tongue.
          4. +3
            28 March 2021 21: 54
            Quote: Hunter 2
            Now the main thing is not to pile up until the end of the term, Kamala Harris is clearly not an adequate aunt, so you can expect anything from her, especially in relation to China (given her Indian roots).

            So that's why China is threatened before lunch, Russia after dinner!
            "The collective farm" Rassvet "- whoever got up earlier is the chairman."
      2. +6
        28 March 2021 18: 46
        Blinken said the US will conduct a dialogue with China from a position of strength

        The navel will be untied at the "exceptional". wassat
      3. +2
        28 March 2021 20: 04
        Quote: Hunter 2
        The pancake is clearly inflated, as if not burnt ...

        Now, for sure, China and Russia are on the same front line with respect to the United States.
        1. -5
          28 March 2021 22: 53
          Quote: figvam
          Now, for sure, China and Russia are on the same front line with respect to the United States.

          How equal are the relations between the Russian Federation and China?
      4. -3
        28 March 2021 22: 51
        Quote: Hunter 2
        Yes, it will not work in any way, chatting - do not carry bags! The pancake is clearly inflated, as if not burnt ...

        "Mikhail Blinkin - appointed by the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Mikhail Mishustin as a leading analyst at the Center for Management of National Projects of the Russian Federation, is a relative of Anthony Blinken, the US Secretary of State in the government of President Biden." taken from here
        https://pikabu.ru/story/za_ukreplenie_semeynyikh_otnosheniy_8000643
        As it is not correct, I think. How strange we all are.
        1. +2
          29 March 2021 01: 29
          A far-fetched theory with "evidence" in the style of "highley like" from an unknown iksperd, based on the fact that the type of surname is rare :)))
          1. -2
            29 March 2021 05: 18
            Quote: VORON538
            Behind the ears a far-fetched theory with "proof" in the style of "highley like"

            What ears? fool There, the entire pedigree is mentioned, with documents, and no one refutes them. wink
            1. +6
              29 March 2021 05: 39
              Yeah, I read it :))) The source of the "investigation" is the American site "radio freedom ua" and an incomprehensible expert on Jews dug somewhere in the pre-revolutionary metrics on the territory of Ukraine and found ... ", and the" investigation "is naturally from the private ones :)))
              1. -4
                29 March 2021 05: 46
                Is your pedigree Hiley Likely too? wink
                1. +4
                  29 March 2021 05: 55
                  My pedigree is based on really existing documents, and not on the conjectures of some "specialist by surnames", who substantiates her thoughts "with a high degree of probability", having scattered an article on "radio freedom Ukraine". :))) However, you want them believe it, believe it, take their word for it :)))
                  1. -2
                    29 March 2021 07: 10
                    Quote: VORON538
                    However, if you want to believe them, believe them, take their word for it :)))

                    In fact, any speculation is easily refuted by bringing facts to the contrary. wink
                    And the investigation was carried out not by the Ukrainian media, but by the American ones.
                    This fundamentally changes the matter, because if it were libel, Blinkin's lawyers would have flooded these media outlets with libel suits.
                    1. 0
                      29 March 2021 11: 14
                      And no one denies that they were looking for and dug by the American media, so beloved by the Russian liberda since the times of the Soviet Union, created to conduct American propaganda on the territory of the USSR and its allies, looking for the roots of their blinken, however, some iksperd by Jewish surnames and other On the basis of the similarity of surnames, she made a verdict in the "highley like" style about the relationship of Russian Blinkin, American Blinken through the supposedly Ukrainian common great-great-great-great-great ... According to her theory, it turns out that many namesakes in the world are relatives. that it is not necessary to pull the owl on the globe :))) Although to believe them, I repeat, it is your right. The fact that no one sues the American media, so Russian Blinkin and himself a frequenter of liberal media :))) But again, this does not prove his degree relationship with American Blinken :)))
          2. +1
            29 March 2021 09: 38
            Quote: VORON538
            A far-fetched theory with "evidence" in the style of "highley like" from an unknown iksperd, based on the fact that the type of surname is rare :)))

            Well, for you, any liquid "God's dew".)))))))
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +3
      28 March 2021 18: 47
      Quote: rocket757
      Blinken said the US will conduct a dialogue with China from a position of strength

      More and more areas of confrontation are emerging in our relations with Beijing. But we continue to cooperate on various issues.

      I do not see the connection.
      1. +1
        28 March 2021 19: 55
        Here she is, strange, multidirectional, chattering such that everyone's head is spinning, THIS IS the new administration of the White House !!!
        1. +4
          28 March 2021 20: 36
          I have noticed for a long time that VO sometimes deliberately presents information in such a way as to direct the discussion in a certain direction, slightly distorting the essence of the original source. This already smacks of ordinary propaganda.
          1. 0
            29 March 2021 14: 37
            Quote: WIKI
            It already smells like

            These are the media .. Scandalous and sensational headlines attract the public. And we are no exception .. alas.
            1. 0
              29 March 2021 15: 14
              I don't know what compels you to comment, but I prefer to find the original source to determine if I am being bred or everything that is written is true. And I don't want to express my opinion for the sake of someone.
    4. +6
      28 March 2021 18: 55
      China has a weak point of supply for food from the US.
      1. +4
        28 March 2021 19: 14
        There is a point, but it is not critical and solvable. There are huge domestic opportunities and a huge international food market here. Whereas who will be supplied from the United States without China is a big question)
      2. +4
        28 March 2021 19: 33
        Quote: 210ox
        China has a weak point of supply for food from the US.

        =======
        This means that they will buy in Russia ...
        1. -5
          28 March 2021 20: 36
          Quote: venik
          This means that they will buy in Russia ...

          Than? For the seed base and for the breeding material, we ourselves are more than half dependent on imports.
          Livestock farming in China is much better developed than ours. So what do you want to sell to them?
          The only thing we "rule" is in the export of grain and oil crops, which are exported to the detriment of our own interests. But for China, this is not a panacea.
          1. +3
            28 March 2021 22: 19
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            Quote: venik
            This means that they will buy in Russia ...

            Than? For the seed base and for the breeding material, we ourselves are more than half dependent on imports.
            Livestock farming in China is much better developed than ours. So what do you want to sell to them?
            The only thing we "rule" is in the export of grain and oil crops, which are exported to the detriment of our own interests. But for China, this is not a panacea.

            don't mislead the audience
            It must be said that Russia is not exporting to China what it is to other countries. In 2018, almost 60% of exports were in seafood - frozen fish, fishmeal, crustaceans and shellfish. Of the rest, soybeans, rapeseed and rapeseed oil constituted a significant part. The share of grain, which is a key Russian export commodity, was a small part. Meat supplies were also limited.
            The situation with the latter in 2019-2020 has changed markedly. The export of meat increased several times, only poultry in January-October was supplied for $ 230 million. The export of pork through Hong Kong is gradually growing.
            1. -1
              28 March 2021 23: 15
              Quote: poquello
              don't mislead the audience

              Do not stress the export of resources (and without specifying the source) as an achievement, including the export of seafood. As a result, domestic prices are growing by leaps and bounds.
              Is there anything to say about the dependence of our agriculture on imported seeds and breeding material? Also a delusion? wink
              1. +3
                28 March 2021 23: 59
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                dependence of our agriculture on imported seeds and breeding material

                do you eat seed potatoes and day old chicks?
                Well
                Alexander Chebotaev: "The agrarian industry of the Altai Territory is not dependent on imported seeds and pedigree material for animal husbandry"

                I mean there are many different farms
                1. -2
                  29 March 2021 05: 11
                  Quote: poquello
                  do you eat seed potatoes and day old chicks?

                  I eat potatoes grown from these seeds and chicken from imported hatching eggs.
                  Quote: poquello
                  I mean there are many different farms

                  Yes, many different ones. But you and the small-town ministers from United Russia are talking about security, meaning only wheat. For sugar beets, rapeseed, corn, potatoes, the dependence is from 60 to 90%. 70% of broiler hatching eggs. And this is the data of the Ministry of Agriculture.
                  It is necessary to shout about this, and not to hush up.
                  It is a betrayal and sabotage to ensure import substitution only on paper in 20 years.
                  PS Will there be a link to the source on the structure of exports to China?
                  1. +1
                    29 March 2021 18: 02
                    There are no exact statistics on the market share of Russian-made vegetable seeds; approximate figures are always named. Statistics for each culture are not fully compiled. For example, almost all cabbage seeds are produced abroad, but in fact they are domestic hybrids, although they are grown outside the country. As soon as they are brought into Russia, they are considered foreign, ”says Svetlana Koroleva, head of the vegetable growing department of the All-Russian Rice Research Institute.
                    There are not many favorable zones in Russia suitable for seed processing. So that the problem lies not so much in breeding as in seed production. Domestic research institutes are already capable of breeding good varieties and hybrids of vegetables, however, the material security of seed farms that are part of the structure of the institutes is low ..

                    The problem is not that we cannot, we have all the resources. The problem is that we don't want ...
                    Bottom line: it smells fried - the seeds will appear.

                    And by the way, albeit slowly, the work is underway.
                    Example for beets:
                    In Russia, in 2021, the share of domestically bred seeds in sugar beet crops may increase 2,6 times, up to 8-10%, the Ministry of Agriculture reports.
                    According to the results of the sowing campaign in 2020, this figure was 3,05% against 0,6% in 2019.


                    Source: official website of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation
                    https://mcx.gov.ru/press-service/news/rossiya-bolee-5-let-podryad-polnostyu-obespechivaet-sebya-sakharom/
                    1. 0
                      29 March 2021 21: 05
                      Quote: Orkraider
                      There are no exact statistics on the market share of Russian-made vegetable seeds; approximate figures are always named.

                      Yes, +/- 5-10%. And even with this error, the result is catastrophic.
                      Quote: Orkraider
                      In Russia, in 2021, the share of domestically bred seeds in sugar beet crops may increase 2,6 times, up to 8-10%,

                      The key word in this statement is "may." But even if this happens, is it not funny to you from the goal - to provide import substitution for sugar in the amount of 8-10% of the total domestic demand?
                      1. 0
                        29 March 2021 23: 38
                        The key word in this statement is "may."


                        Maybe it will, the trend is visible and the trend is clear.
                        Less than 1% in 2019
                        3,5% in 2020
                        8% or 10% in 2021, easy. I believe in this figure.

                        Doesn't it make you laugh at the goal - to provide import substitution for sugar in the amount of 8-10% of the total domestic demand?


                        Not funny, it's sad and sad.

                        The real problem is not that we cannot, we have all the resources. And opportunities too, by the way. The problem is that they try to do this very slowly:
                        In 2019, the Ministry of Science and Higher Education managed to create 100 new laboratories, mainly in the field of breeding and the molecular genetic industry. In 2020, they issued new samples. In 2021, it is planned to commission a center for the analysis of the genomes of cultivated plants. The construction of agrobiotechnoparks will begin in 2022.


                        But this is slow, too slow. The main problem is that breeders in Russia are weakly connected to the market. And the scheme for returning money to breeding and seed production "does not function at all." From here there is no flow of money back to science and seed production centers. Hence, it is the State that must regulate and create the rules of the game. And demand their observance. And if we don’t do it, we will be left behind.

                        Soon we will see, in general, everything goes to this, that they will press.
                      2. 0
                        30 March 2021 07: 53
                        Quote: Orkraider
                        Soon we will see, in general, everything goes to this, that they will press.

                        I have no faith in this at all. request For I remember Putin's words about food security 15 years ago, but things are still there.
                        For potatoes, the share of imported seeds has only increased in recent years. hi
                  2. 0
                    29 March 2021 18: 32
                    Quote: Ingvar 72
                    PS Will there be a link to the source on the structure of exports to China?

                    what? this is a detailed article in Izvestia
                    https://iz.ru/1091015/dmitrii-migunov/nakormit-kitai-rossiiskie-produkty-pustiat-na-krupneishii-rynok-mira
                    1. 0
                      29 March 2021 20: 59
                      Quote: poquello
                      what? this is a detailed article in Izvestia

                      That is, the opinion of the fatalists. I'm telling you about the data of the Ministry of Agriculture. Do you feel the difference?
                      1. 0
                        29 March 2021 21: 44
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        Quote: poquello
                        what? this is a detailed article in Izvestia

                        That is, the opinion of the fatalists. I'm telling you about the data of the Ministry of Agriculture. Do you feel the difference?

                        naturally! the professional opinion of a journalist who smoked this topic and a commentator who talks about some data from the Ministry of Agriculture, who did not bother to type in the search for "imports from Russia to China"
                      2. +1
                        29 March 2021 21: 48
                        Once again - journalists "smoke" different things, and the Ministry of Agriculture operates with figures. Imports to China are to the detriment of their population, and there is no reason for pride.
                      3. 0
                        29 March 2021 21: 52
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        Once again - journalists "smoke" different things, and the Ministry of Agriculture operates with figures. Imports to China are to the detriment of their population, and no reason to be proud.

                        Is it written there?
                        What are you reading?
                        Quote: Orkraider
                        There are no exact statistics on the market share of Russian-made vegetable seeds; approximate figures are always named. Statistics for each culture are not fully compiled. For example, almost all cabbage seeds are produced abroad, but in fact they are domestic hybrids, although they are grown outside the country. As soon as they are brought into Russia, they are considered foreign ",
                      4. 0
                        29 March 2021 21: 54
                        Quote: poquello
                        What are you reading?

                        Yes, and I have already answered this opponent. But, as always, you see only what is convenient for you. wink
                      5. 0
                        29 March 2021 22: 03
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        Quote: poquello
                        What are you reading?

                        Yes, and I have already answered this opponent. But, as always, you see only what is convenient for you. wink

                        therefore, I did not answer what is being purchased and is planning to buy China in Russia?
                        chicken feet is this prod delivery?
                      6. 0
                        29 March 2021 22: 17
                        Quote: poquello
                        chicken feet is this prod delivery?

                        Yes, but they are at least 70% dependent on the supply of hatching eggs from the EU.
                        Remind you how the United States forced European companies to stop cooperating with the Russian Federation on Nord Stream-2? wink
                        Do you really understand what I mean? That our food security is nothing more than zilch, like the notorious import substitution?
                      7. 0
                        29 March 2021 22: 43
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        Yes, but they are at least 70% dependent on the supply of hatching eggs from the EU.

                        here we fundamentally disagree, because
                        - once, the work is in progress,
                        -two, this is a market, if TNCs are kicked up - small producers will come in, if the EU kicks up - other countries will come in
                      8. 0
                        30 March 2021 07: 55
                        Quote: poquello
                        - once, the work is in progress,

                        Yes, like at the Vostochny cosmodrome. Efforts and development of the budget with minimal results.
                      9. 0
                        30 March 2021 18: 41
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        Quote: poquello
                        - once, the work is in progress,

                        Yes, like at the Vostochny cosmodrome. Efforts and development of the budget with minimal results.

                        yes, as in Vostochny, only there is less control, respectively, less revealing
      3. 0
        28 March 2021 19: 38
        On the contrary. China supplies the USA.
      4. 0
        28 March 2021 22: 13
        And China also has investments in the US economy in the amount of 1300 billion dollars, as well as large supplies of rare earth metals.
    5. +4
      28 March 2021 18: 57
      Quote: rocket757
      Blinken said the US will conduct a dialogue with China from a position of strength
      Okay, okay, let's see how they do it ...


      There is nothing to watch, nothing will burn out for them, China is too tough for them ...
      1. +1
        28 March 2021 19: 48
        This is exactly what I want to see ... how the minke whales decided to take a chance with their teeth.
        However, they have good dentistry, and they will be able to provide a good smile to Uncle Sam for any
        1. +2
          28 March 2021 20: 10
          Oh, something tells me, but not in this case ...
    6. +8
      28 March 2021 19: 01
      Quote: rocket757
      Okay, okay, let's see how they do it

      They were ten years late. With pressure on China ... The current attempts are like trying to stop the locomotive at speed, grabbing the rear hitch ...
      1. 0
        28 March 2021 19: 50
        The force of inertia. The country is big, they were gaining acceleration not weak, but then inertia ... but everything will end if there was no new impulse, there was no acceleration.
    7. +2
      28 March 2021 19: 02
      They isolated-isolated Russia ... Now China will be!

      The electrical tape won't run out, by any chance?

      But they were out of luck! All of them are made in China, I bought a blue one, old-school kind of like ... And it is made of pvc, but from the Middle Kingdom. I experienced feelings of nostalgia and sadness.
      1. +1
        29 March 2021 02: 58
        Quote: RealPilot
        bought a blue

        I remember that in 83 I bought it. Two rolls of duct tape, and two light bulbs. And at the car repair shop they were spinning like daddy Carlo. The wires were clamped in a vice, and the electrical tape was wound.
    8. +2
      28 March 2021 19: 19
      This is not to give a trillion dollars of loans to the Chinese, the Yankees are ready to start a war!
    9. The comment was deleted.
    10. +2
      28 March 2021 19: 48
      Quote: rocket757
      Blinken said the US will conduct a dialogue with China from a position of strength
      Okay, okay, let's see how they do it ...

      Goebbels at one time also talked something about the position of strength in relation to the USSR. And what happened?
      1. +3
        28 March 2021 20: 43
        We can assume that Napoleon was humming about a colossus with feet of clay, which you just need to push!
        Times are different, provocateurs, humming are the same.
        1. +3
          28 March 2021 23: 01
          China is not Russia, for which the preservation of the notorious "partner relations" is above all else (how else, if "everything" is kept by the partners and is located, both state and personal, with the "elite"?). Russia only has - "" Zakharov on Twitter "," regrets "and" hopes for future interaction. "China, on the other hand, can bite. And it hurts to bite:
          It would seem, what does the world famous luxury clothing brand Burberry have to do with the showdown between Beijing and London or Washington? As it turned out, the most direct one. The company is part of the Better Cotton Initiative, a group that advocates for more advanced cotton production. Back in October last year, members of this community announced that they would give up Xinjiang cotton, because in this region "there are problems with the observance of human rights." Well, anyway, that's what a variety of human rights activists say ...
          In response, the whole of the Middle Kingdom turned away from Burberry - social networks are overflowing with calls not to buy the products of this company, and the famous Chinese actress Zhou Dongyu terminated her advertising contract with the company. She, like many other public figures, declare that they intend to "support their country in boycotting companies that spread lies about Xinjiang."
          “Under fire” was not only the manufacturer mentioned above, but also a number of leading world brands, which also very imprudently decided to support the Xinjiang theme. So, the Swedish company H&M, which last year refused to cooperate with textile factories from this region, is today excluded from all electronic trading platforms of the Middle Kingdom, including such a giant as Alibaba. The ostracism of the Chinese and such "giants" as Adidas, Nike, New Balance did not escape. Chinese celebrities are breaking contracts with him and calling on their compatriots to boycott those goods that they advertised yesterday.

          How tangible can be the losses from such a situation for well-known manufacturers? More than serious - that's for sure. For example, the same H & M has in China, which is the third largest market for it in the world, more than five hundred stores, which brought the brand in 2019 about one and a half billion dollars in revenue. A very similar situation is with Nike, whose products in the Middle Kingdom are sold only slightly less than in Europe. 7 thousand stores in the country is impressive, as well as last year's earnings in China, which amounted to $ 6,7 billion.

          Such blows do not pass without consequences - and, as far as we know, they have already come. The all-knowing Forbes claims that Nike shares, which have shown strong growth over the past year, immediately "sank" by 6% after the scandal in China. H&M quotes have dropped by 4% so far, but it will still be ... At the very least, current events should make corporations think that it is hardly worth getting into purely political scandals between world powers in an effort to earn a reputation as "advocates of human rights." Costs too much ...

          In this situation, it is worth noting that the Chinese experience of rebuffing other people's attempts to "educate" the country by unceremoniously interfering in its internal affairs, perhaps, should be adopted by Russia as well. At least due to the fact that such attempts are made against her on a regular basis. What we can and should learn for sure is the Chinese social cohesion around the goal of protecting the reputation, honor and dignity of our homeland. If necessary, then to the detriment of personal interests and income. In the modern world, it is not easy for a country that is not part of the conventional elite of the Western "civilized community" to make its representatives reckon with themselves. But, as we can see, it is quite real.

          https://finobzor.ru/104504-stoit-pouchitsja-kitajcy-otvetili-na-sankcii-bojkotom-mirovyh-brendov.html?utm_source=topwar.ru
  2. +1
    28 March 2021 18: 19
    Blinken said the US will conduct a dialogue with China from a position of strength
    fool We saw how they ran into China in Alaska and ... wiped themselves off. recourse
  3. +4
    28 March 2021 18: 19
    That is, it is acceptable to impose sanctions on China, but not to respond to these sanctions. Typical American logic is the logic of "exclusivity."


    Nothing soon they will resist and wear out ...
    1. +4
      28 March 2021 18: 24
      If the current administration does not prove that it is better / cooler than Trump's ... it will lose and it will pour into the pipe, under panfares, not to go to the grandmother.
      1. +4
        28 March 2021 18: 55
        And this is the whole Abamov team, but they did not shine at all and they have nothing to brag about ...
        1. 0
          28 March 2021 19: 58
          So let's see how they complete their task ...
          1. +1
            28 March 2021 20: 11
            Our choice is not great, we'll see, but it's already clear that they don't know where to go ...
            1. +1
              28 March 2021 20: 45
              Quote: cniza
              Our choice is not great, we'll see, but it's already clear that they don't know where to go ...

              That's right, serious experts say that there are Wishlist, but there is absolutely no way to know how to implement them.
              The situation is not ice, that's for sure.
              1. +1
                28 March 2021 20: 55
                They will not be childish, but the result may be the opposite of what was expected ...
                1. +1
                  28 March 2021 21: 03
                  So we'll see ... well, keep our fists ready, without unclenching!
                  1. +2
                    28 March 2021 21: 08
                    Well, yes, we will watch how the United States rests its teeth and legs in order to maintain its dominance ...
  4. +2
    28 March 2021 18: 24
    Well, I don’t believe that one and a half billion Chinese were taken and crap out of fear from these words.
    We would have already felt the southeast wind ... crying
  5. 0
    28 March 2021 18: 25
    Sherkhan has grown decrepit. But out of habit he tries to growl.
    1. 0
      28 March 2021 18: 44
      It's just that we are witnessing a strange but rapid transformation of Sher Khan into a Tabaki jackal .. And a snarling jackal is cool. But somehow it's not very scary ..
  6. +2
    28 March 2021 18: 34
    The impression is that with the advent of the senile Joe, the politics of Fashington began to fully correspond to the image of the president. Aggressive senile.
  7. +8
    28 March 2021 18: 39
    It was funny to listen to Blinkin's compliments to the EU: "I am not Trump, I love and respect you. But you will pursue the policy that Washington dictates."
    An American is hardly interested in Uighurs and dissidents. But he does not mind turning up the SP-2 and all sorts of "silk roads" ... But exactly 2 years ago, Mr. Xi's visit to Europe was a triumph for the Celestial Empire: a sea of ​​contracts, infrastructure projects, drooling of European investors ...
  8. +1
    28 March 2021 18: 42
    Does the navel come loose? To conduct a dialogue from a "position of strength" with two great powers at once is the height of madness, just some kind of agony.
    1. -7
      28 March 2021 19: 20
      With one power, we are only afloat at the expense of RVSN, everything else is done to please the West.
  9. +1
    28 March 2021 18: 43
    An official of this rank makes similar statements to the world's second economy. Either the Americans have such a goal to swear with everyone, or really, from faith in their own super-duper power, the roof has blown away.
    1. -6
      28 March 2021 19: 19
      Rather, the roof.
    2. +2
      28 March 2021 20: 39
      An official of this rank makes similar statements to the world's second economy.
      Whether the second is a very big question. If financial bubbles are thrown out of the US GDP, and the stock market, which has become obsolete by the assessment of capitalization, is slightly scratched out, then God forbid the United States to sit firmly in second place. The real production is that ... They themselves were transferred to China. Yes to India, with other Thailand and Vietnam.
  10. +5
    28 March 2021 18: 46
    "More and more areas of confrontation are emerging in our relationship with Beijing." You are creating these "confrontations" by interfering in the internal affairs of sovereign countries, imposing sanctions restrictions on completely far-fetched pretexts.
    1. -10
      28 March 2021 20: 18
      Internal affairs, internal affairs, and if these matters are mockery of people, then how? It is necessary to react somehow. Or be silent to everyone? Or maybe the Chinese authorities are really mocking the Uighurs?
  11. +1
    28 March 2021 18: 47
    Sometimes it seems that THEY live in another world. Or as from the movie: "What are you smoking there?"
  12. 0
    28 March 2021 18: 52
    The Yankees will not tolerate challenges or any rivalry; NO ONE dares to interfere with their interests.
    Will increasingly support opposition and separatism.
    “When it seems that the whole world is against you - remember that the plane takes off against the wind.” Henry Ford
  13. 0
    28 March 2021 19: 03
    Quote: Roma-1977
    Sherkhan has grown decrepit. But out of habit he tries to growl.

    Everyone's lining up to kick the lame lion ...
    And before the line was the same, and the same ones lined up in it! But with a different purpose: to kiss him ...
  14. +2
    28 March 2021 19: 11
    It is they who are so brave because it is not for them to go to the front line
  15. +3
    28 March 2021 19: 16
    Blinken said the US will conduct a dialogue with China from a position of strength


    It's like in a joke about an impotent man who claims that he can have sex all night long))
  16. 0
    28 March 2021 19: 17
    Well, with such statements they will wait for the economies of China, Russia and the Asian and African countries controlled by China to pupate into a closed self-sufficient cluster in all spheres, independent of the West. And there, my grandmother for two said who would have resources for a long time.
  17. -2
    28 March 2021 19: 24
    The world hegemon will not tolerate competitors in his place. Therefore, against China, Russia and others who have the potential to stand in one place with the United States or even push them out, they will do all sorts of dirty tricks and nasty things until they lose their potential and collapse at the feet of the winner. Therefore, one should not be surprised at the sanctions, this is a grip for the future.
    1. +2
      28 March 2021 19: 48
      Quote: Herman 4223
      The world hegemon will not tolerate competitors in his place. Therefore, against China, Russia and others who have the potential to stand in one place with the United States or even push them out, they will do all sorts of dirty tricks and nasty things until they lose their potential and collapse at the feet of the winner. Therefore, one should not be surprised at the sanctions, this is a grip for the future.


      Sanctions can of course be a very powerful tool. But the United States, neither China nor Russia, can single-handedly bend it into a ram's horn. An obedient coalition is needed, and as the previous examples show, the United States, despite the sanctions, if necessary, it trades, but in their opinion, everyone except the United States should adhere to the American sanctions policy strictly, even though it will be like a sickle in one place.

      The number of countries with which the United States wants to wage an economic war (with the help of a broad obedient coalition) is growing.
      The costs for the "coalition" are also increasing.

      The coalition is of course obedient, but discontent is growing. The United States will begin to impose sanctions on Sarats, allies, fellow travelers ...?

      There are already grazes with the EU, Turkey is under sanctions, India's main ally against China has also already been announced as a candidate for sanctions ...

      As if the United States is not left alone against everyone.

      By the way, China's response is so harsh, most likely because the Chinese knew that this was the beginning of the actions of the broad Anti-Chinese coalition.
      The tough answer is a signal for the US sixes that if they continue, it will cost them dearly.
      1. +1
        29 March 2021 06: 45
        Under the existing world regime, the United States will not be left alone. Anyone who needs to print dollars, especially zealous punished.
  18. 0
    28 March 2021 19: 25
    The handcuffs are short on mattress mats! The mouth was opened to the loaf, but if the loaf were not stuck in the throat!
  19. +1
    28 March 2021 19: 26
    Silenok is enough, "OladushkEn"? The cowboys got drunk, did not notice how the strengths go into the sand.
    1. +2
      28 March 2021 20: 14
      It is they who, by inertia, inflate their cheeks ...
  20. 0
    28 March 2021 19: 43
    "Silovik" Antosha Blinkin is still out of business - since last year, China has the largest GDP in the world and China continues to increase its lead over the United States laughing
  21. Gar
    +3
    28 March 2021 19: 43
    After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Western politicians have noticeably degraded. The words "from a position of strength" are already causing an allergy. Come up with, already, something new,
    1. +2
      28 March 2021 20: 13
      They have not taught them anything else, they consider themselves to be superhuman ...
  22. +2
    28 March 2021 19: 46
    Beadon has the first Blinkin-com!
    laughing laughing laughing
    1. +1
      28 March 2021 20: 12
      This damn will lead them, oh will let them down ...
  23. -7
    28 March 2021 20: 06
    The PLA has the number 1 ground forces in the world! Air Force # 5, Navy # 5
    1. The comment was deleted.
  24. +3
    28 March 2021 20: 27
    The real geopolitical enemy of the United States in the long term is only the growing China, our only weak point at the present time is sp2, which the Americans are constantly pressing on like a corn, we are not a serious adversary for the United States, only our nuclear club saves us, the Americans creating hotbeds of instability along our borders and imposing sanctions, they force us to spend our modest resources, so that Trump and Biden are consistent in their actions, for them the main enemy is only China and this is for a long time, we are watching the development of the situation and helping the Chinese, here at least to complete the early warning system
    1. +2
      28 March 2021 20: 37
      our only weak point at the moment is sp2

      If.
      There is also the Economy, demography, a bunch of conflicts along the entire length of the borders, a bunch of unresolved problems with neighbors from Ukraine to Belarus ..
      for them the main enemy is only China

      They say that there is still someone .. Europe for example.
    2. +16
      28 March 2021 21: 36
      Quote: CommanderDIVA
      our only weak point at the moment is sp2

      Not only!
      1. Dependence of budget replenishment on imports of hydrocarbons
      2. Technological lag in a number of positions - the simplest aircraft industry
      3. Lack of foreign investment in the economy
  25. -1
    28 March 2021 20: 35
    Great news, I think. And good luck to them!
    1. 0
      28 March 2021 20: 46
      Quote: alexmach
      Great news, I think. And good luck to them!

      Shit like Hitler? It is enough for China to tighten up the base of mattresses, and the resources will drive the mattresses in convoys, and China will calmly heat them. The PRC does not even have a nuclear warhead, it will be like with the USSR, they, like ours, will rivet resources in the depths. And if the mattress takes a vigorous club, then the mattress continent will go nuts, because no one knows how many nuclear warheads are hidden in the caves.
      1. +1
        28 March 2021 20: 50
        Well, about "just sinking the convoys" I somehow very much doubt it. The United States still has absolute superiority at sea. And in general, I don’t really believe in the hot war between the United States and China, but even if it’s the flag in their hands, both of them. But from a position of strength - let them talk to themselves.
        1. -1
          28 March 2021 20: 56
          Quote: alexmach
          The United States still has superiority at sea

          Absolute in what? In large targets for hyper PCR (which China has)? Flag mattresses in the fifth point. laughing and yes, if they have not been banned from Google, look at how many Chinese submarines have already riveted, and then read how the convoys in the Second World War were drowned by the Fritzes.
          1. 0
            28 March 2021 20: 58
            Absolute in what?

            In quantity and quality.
            In large targets for hyper PCR (which China has)?

            Yeah .. and in target designation systems, by the way, too.
            and then read what convoys in the Second World War the Fritzes drowned.

            And what, did it help them a lot?
            1. -1
              28 March 2021 21: 08
              Quote: alexmach
              and in target designation systems by the way too.

              Do you have reliable evidence on hand that everything is so neglected in the PRC? Turn on the logic, if no one knows about their nuclear weapons, then why should they stick out something new? This is a wise monkey, it is enough to start riveting with packs of weapons, and then you can stick out the navel like mattresses.
              Quote: alexmach
              And what, did it help them a lot?

              If it weren't for the coalition, it would have helped. And here is an interesting question winked against whom will the coalition gather if the lion is already dying?
  26. 0
    28 March 2021 20: 43
    Anthony Blinken announced that the United States will conduct a dialogue from a position

    knee-elbow laughing
  27. +2
    28 March 2021 20: 52
    Do not overstrain, we didn’t risk it with North Korea and went home, and here is China.
  28. +1
    28 March 2021 21: 05
    Quote: Pandiurin
    As if the United States is not left alone against everyone.

    To begin with, it is necessary to unite everyone who is already under US sanctions into one coalition - the anti-Naglo-Saxon one. laughing
    Then recall the contradictions within the Naglo-Saxon coalition: BLM, the Civil War of the North and South, the War of Independence of the North American colonies, the Opium Wars, the Sepoy Rebellion, the ashes of Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Remember everything!
  29. 0
    28 March 2021 21: 14
    From the standpoint of the strength of the diaper, who is 120 years old in the Senate.
  30. +1
    28 March 2021 21: 26
    Quote: evgen1221
    Rather, the roof.

    If only the bottom does not squeeze out laughing
  31. +19
    28 March 2021 21: 33
    With what "strength"? The economies are so tightly bound that the United States and China are almost Siamese twins. They will be forced to negotiate.
  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. 0
    28 March 2021 21: 49
    This is what the legalization of drugs does .. Forgot to prohibit by law for diplomats - here you go laughing
  34. +1
    28 March 2021 21: 51
    No, Kilmkin's fantasies were more fun than Blinikin's ...
  35. 0
    28 March 2021 21: 51
    Companies involved in the construction of Nord Stream 2 must complete the facility, despite objections from Washington. This was stated by US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken. laughing
  36. Cat
    +1
    28 March 2021 22: 39
    The states managed to destroy the USSR, I hope the Chinese uh .. comrades have drawn conclusions from this, judging by the events in Hong Kong
  37. 0
    28 March 2021 23: 19
    So the sanctions of China are not permissible) but the dialogue should be conducted from a position of strength) yes ...
  38. +1
    29 March 2021 00: 33
    Quote: Hunter 2
    Now the main thing is not to pile up until the end of the term, Kamala Harris -

    The probability is high that it will accumulate. The situation is similar, as with the Roosevelt-Truman duet.
  39. -1
    29 March 2021 00: 39
    I wonder if Chinese billionaires keep money in overseas banks?
  40. +1
    29 March 2021 00: 47
    Well, what kind of secretary of state is he after that ???
  41. 0
    29 March 2021 00: 51
    Blinken added that Washington will cooperate with China in those areas that directly relate to US interests.
    But will the PRC "cooperate" with the Merikatos - "in those spheres that directly relate to the interests of the United States"? The question, however!
  42. 0
    29 March 2021 05: 51
    Maybe the Chinese will break your nose.
  43. 0
    29 March 2021 07: 27
    It is unlikely that the Matrastan chicken will be able to ride the red dragon .. But let them amuse themselves with their "exclusivity" and "uncompromisingness" for now.
  44. -1
    29 March 2021 09: 43
    And what is Blinken's strength?
    Is it strength in the dollar?
    Is it the power of knowledge?
    Strength in the US Army and Navy?
    No - the strength of the United States lies in the fifth point of those in power and the sciatic nerve, in particular, because apparently everything is done to them.
  45. -1
    29 March 2021 10: 21
    Judging by the President of the United States, the forces are not very enough even to solve internal problems, and it was not in vain that Vladimir Putin wished them health ...
  46. -1
    29 March 2021 10: 38
    It's time for the United States to stop puffing its cheeks. In industrial production, China is several times larger than the United States (for example, in steel production more than 10 times). The existing technological lag in certain types of production is being eliminated at a rapid pace. In the next 10 years, China will become the absolute world leader in all areas of science, technology and production.
  47. 0
    29 March 2021 13: 47
    Khochu uvidet kak im eto poluchitsa. :)
  48. +1
    29 March 2021 14: 28
    From a position of strength, dialogue cannot and should not be conducted. The one whose strength dictates, and the weak fulfills.