"This is unacceptable": US Secretary of State reacted to China's imposition of anti-American sanctions

129

The United States reacted to the sanctions imposed by China. We are talking about a number of restrictive measures that Beijing has introduced against the United States and Canada. In particular, several American and Canadian officials, whose activities in the Xinjiang Uygur direction, Beijing called anti-Chinese, fell under the Chinese sanctions. These sanctions are a continuation of China's response to states that previously imposed sanctions against this country. So, a few days earlier, restrictive measures were introduced against Britain and the entire European Union.

US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken commented on the situation. According to him, the imposition of sanctions against American citizens "because of China's attempts to hide the situation in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region" are "unacceptable." We are talking, in particular, about the measures taken by the PRC against two members of the American commission "on international freedom of religion"



Blinken:

It is unacceptable. We consider these sanctions to be unfounded.

The US Secretary of State called China's measures "attempts to intimidate and silence people who defend human rights."

Blinken:

These actions by China will only draw the international community's attention to the crimes taking place in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.

In his statement, Anthony Blinken accused China of "genocide" of the population of this autonomous region of the People's Republic of China.

In China, in turn, they said that the United States needs to pay more attention to the genocide that they committed in their country and which they continue to organize in the world.
  • Facebook / State Department USA
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

129 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    28 March 2021 08: 01
    I'm happy for Blinken - he reads quickly and gives voice to decisions. and what will be the actions of the state? Wait for the evolution of the regime, as against the USSR?
    1. +84
      28 March 2021 08: 05
      "It is unacceptable"

      "This is unacceptable" , in another version - "And what about us?" request
      1. -22
        28 March 2021 08: 18
        Quote: Insurgent
        "It is unacceptable"

        "This is unacceptable" , in another version - "And what about us?" request


        For objectivity: oil supplies from Russia to the United States in 2020 averaged 538 barrels per day, which is even more than imports from Saudi Arabia. Now Russian oil is actively ordered by the American Exxon Mobil, Chevron and Valero Energy.

        Russia takes advantage of the sanctions against Venezuela and makes money on them, in fact, supporting the sanctions regime. So is the Russian Federation a sovereign power or a gas station selling to everyone who pays?
        1. +9
          28 March 2021 08: 25
          Quote: dorz
          Russia takes advantage of the sanctions against Venezuela and makes money on them, in fact, supporting the sanctions regime. So is the Russian Federation an independent power or a gas station selling to everyone who pays?


          And all this (video), how to develop and maintain?

          Yes, it is unfounded to call Russia a "gas station"; the scale of theft must also be recognized.

          BUT ... At the same time, the army is getting stronger (among other things), which at the moment is more important than all conventions.

          1. 0
            28 March 2021 09: 18
            the entire might of the army begins with the cow - and the milkmaids comrade Mani. and agitation for conscripts. Who feeds the army? oil oligarchs? or milkmaids? -An answer to the raison d'être of Russia.

            For what to fight, protect?
            1. +1
              28 March 2021 09: 25
              Quote: antivirus
              the entire might of the army begins with the cow - and the milkmaids comrade Mani. and agitation for conscripts. Who feeds the army? oil oligarchs? or milkmaids? -An answer to the raison d'être of Russia.

              And the cow, forgive me, which "the milkmaid comrade Manya" pulls by the udder, appeared by itself ("leaked")?
              Or has agriculture and commercial livestock raising (a particular example of a cow) in Russia revived without the participation of the state?

              Probably leaked ... Yes Yes , exactly Yes

              1. -26
                28 March 2021 09: 27
                the answer is accepted. the deflection, in the right direction is shown ..............................
                a cow appeared with a person before any state
                1. +20
                  28 March 2021 09: 40
                  Quote: antivirus
                  the answer is accepted. the deflection, in the right direction is shown ..............................
                  a cow appeared with a person before any state

                  Well ... Further "bending" in front of you, I definitely do not intend, proving with examples and data, what agricultural production in Russia was quite recently (90s and early 2000s) and what it has become.

                  All the same, it will fly into one of you - it will fly into another.
                  1. -23
                    28 March 2021 11: 19
                    teacher. great. intensive production of agricultural households is the development of capitalism, and the personal cow of t Mani is autonomy, survival in any conditions.
                    Leningrad goners were brought to life by folk methods - rhubarb. burdock and other decoctions. then only amersky egg powder.
                    different worldviews, views on overcoming extreme loads
                    I have not watched videos - and there are not enough Tajiks and Chinese in the fields for YOUR OWN PRODUCTION.
                    CHUBAIS WAS DRINKED WITH MILK FROM THE COW T. MANI. Not the Chinese stroked and fed that cow (including mowing hay).
                    this is the vitality of the people and the state.
                    1. +4
                      28 March 2021 12: 26
                      Quote: antivirus
                      ... intensive production of s / households is the development of capitalism, and the personal cow of t Mani is autonomy, survival in any conditions

                      Is it not the spirit of Alexander Isaevich, not the good memory of Solzhenitsyn, who is broadcasting through your lips?

                      So you are in favor of "zemstvo", a small owner-producer? ? ?

                      Well, so you for sure - "Equip Russia" Yes , small pests ...
                      1. -6
                        28 March 2021 15: 46
                        from Isaich's first article in Komsomolskaya Pravda - I don't like it .......................
                      2. -1
                        31 March 2021 16: 30
                        waited several days - now in essence-
                        FOR THE PROFESSIONALS OF THE MILITARY, FORGIVING BEFORE THE SHOWING SYMBOLS OF THE GOS-VA - like the Kremlin with eagles or stars, etc. in the army.
                        A SMALL HOMELAND AND THAT T. MANYA WITH A COW. large commercial production did not replace private farmsteads in 20-80. Now there are no cows and there is no life in the outback, a desert.
                        For mercenaries - this is the norm for a den allowance and a pension to serve. for conscript service and mobilization - "they went with their jokes .." you will not win TRMV on professionals. only evenly spread butter all over a piece of bread ...
                        half of the country is empty. and over and above the congestion in the people
                        without continuing the dispute. Solzynitsyn was identified in 89 as a nationalist and chauvinist
                  2. +1
                    29 March 2021 12: 46
                    Well ... Further "bending" in front of you, I definitely do not intend, proving with examples and data, what agricultural production in Russia was quite recently (90s and early 2000s) and what it has become.
                    Look less propaganda and more often look at the price tags in stores, they only increase with the growth of the dollar. This says only one thing, self-sufficiency in agricultural products is a lie. The sowing material is imported, the overwhelming part of the equipment is imported and spare parts. to her, also not domestic, etc.
                    What kind of food independence can we talk about? Only about ostentatious. If agriculture became independent of imports, then prices would inevitably go down, which is not visible, even in the long run. For the domestic market, though capacious, is finite.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                2. -4
                  28 March 2021 11: 02
                  Who feeds the army? oil oligarchs? or milkmaids? -


                  a cow appeared with a person before any state

                  Journalists ask the farmer:
                  - Tell me how your year went.
                  - Do not believe it, great. A good grain harvest - without bread
                  I’ll stay, the potato was a success - again I’m not hungry, but also a pig
                  farrowed ...
                  “Would you like to thank the president for this?”
                  - Yes, why? He plowed himself, sowed himself, raised and harvested himself again - in
                  what is his merit here.
                  - How so? (tough) And you think!
                  - Ah, well, if you think about it, I don’t deny about the pig, it could have done anything
                  to be...
              2. +4
                28 March 2021 19: 19
                Can't keep a cow without the state?
        2. +15
          28 March 2021 08: 26
          Throw in? I understand that this works
          "This is unacceptable": US Secretary of State reacted to China's imposition of anti-American sanctions

          That's right in the voice of neigh laughing How funny they resent
          1. +2
            28 March 2021 12: 46
            Quote: Mitroha
            That's right in the voice of a laugh How funny they are outraged

            Well, yes, very pretentious: "It is unacceptable. We consider these sanctions to be unfounded."
            Blinken, who is now the head of the US Secretary of State, is inadequate, sincerely outraged: How dare some Chinese people impose sanctions on USA? They have the right to impose sanctions on anyone in the world and go crazy only USA!!! laughing laughing laughing
        3. +14
          28 March 2021 08: 29
          Quote: dorz
          Russia takes advantage of the sanctions against Venezuela and makes money on them, in fact, supporting the sanctions regime. So is the Russian Federation a sovereign power or a gas station selling to everyone who pays?

          Duc, the USA and England have been doing this throughout history, so at least take the shale topic with liquefied gas ... And why don't you go to a picket against their embassies with posters about justice? wink
          1. -23
            28 March 2021 08: 33
            The article is not about justice, but about China's sanctions against the United States.
            1. +10
              28 March 2021 08: 39
              Quote: dorz
              The article is not about justice, but about China's sanctions against the United States.

              A-aa ... Well, yes .., well, yes ... What is allowed to Jupiter is not allowed to a bull. laughing
          2. +1
            28 March 2021 17: 12
            So then he will not be allowed either to the USA or to England. Moreover, they will be put on the wanted list laughing
        4. +5
          28 March 2021 08: 33
          You have somehow confused the cause with the effect. Plus the main thing is that you don't understand what you are talking about.
        5. +12
          28 March 2021 09: 44
          Are you sure that Russia is not supplying Venezuelan oil?
        6. +7
          28 March 2021 10: 16
          Quote: dorz
          For objectivity: oil supplies from Russia to the United States in 2020 averaged 538 barrels per day, which is even more than imports from Saudi Arabia. Now Russian oil is actively ordered by the American Exxon Mobil, Chevron and Valero Energy.

          Russia enjoys sanctions against Venezuela и Earns on them, actually supporting the sanctions regime

          you, apparently, reprinted not entirely reliable information from Aftershock, refuted in the comments to it: Russia supplies, in the main, not oil, but Fuel oil and the rise of his supplies was still far awaym 2010 d, while the sanctions against Veneuela happened much later and could not affect.

          And the Chinese are great: the amers are clearly in pain! And that means they are doing the right thing (as well as to the EU)!
        7. +10
          28 March 2021 10: 42
          Russia takes advantage of the sanctions against Venezuela and makes money on them, in fact, supporting the sanctions regime.

          Here we probably have a triangular scheme (as with the Donbas coal)) The Teksa refineries are sharpened for heavy oil (Venezuela, like Urals). T e. Russian companies buy Venezuela oil and sell it to the states ... Russian?)) And the former clients of Urals-a- are already Venezuela.
          1. -8
            28 March 2021 11: 20
            Quote: anzar
            Russia takes advantage of the sanctions against Venezuela and makes money on them, in fact, supporting the sanctions regime.

            Here we probably have a triangular scheme (as with the Donbas coal)) The Teksa refineries are sharpened for heavy oil (Venezuela, like Urals). T e. Russian companies buy Venezuela oil and sell it to the states ... Russian?)) And the former clients of Urals-a- are already Venezuela.

            It may be so, but it is unlikely that the United States could go to such a scheme with countries under sanctions.
            1. +6
              28 March 2021 15: 46
              For 300% profit, as they say ...
        8. +6
          28 March 2021 12: 37
          Quote: dorz
          Russia uses sanctions against Venezuela and makes money on them

          laughing laughing laughing There is definitely no need to worry about Venezuela here, just another link has appeared in the previous scheme. Yes
          1. -2
            29 March 2021 06: 54
            Country gas station country - outbid hi
        9. +6
          28 March 2021 22: 21
          Quote: dorz
          So is the Russian Federation a sovereign power or a gas station selling to everyone who pays?

          Lovers of the mantra about "the country of the gas station" do not get one simple thought. Russia sells hydrocarbons not because it is "underdeveloped" or with a wrong economy, but simply because it CAN sell. Just like Erdogan can turn the crane and resell Russian gas to the Balkans. Just as Reichs-Fuehrer Merkel will do it when the Nord Stream-2 is completed. Previously, they did not have such an opportunity, they had to "trade" green energy and pretend that it was cool and progressive, now there is / will be the opportunity to bunch Russian gas across Europe. Isn't it a column? Especially against the backdrop of a decline in sales from the lockdown (there is no one to buy behi / Mercedes, everyone is sitting at home).
          1. -5
            29 March 2021 06: 32
            And she cannot but sell, there is nothing more to sell except for weapons and grain and timber.
            1. 0
              April 11 2021 18: 21
              Quote: Modun
              And she can't help but sell

              You can continue to believe it.
      2. +19
        28 March 2021 08: 23
        Quote: Insurgent
        "It is unacceptable"

        "This is unacceptable" , in another version - "And what about us?" request

        It looks like the fowls have lost their monopoly on "What for us?" and mattresses will now increasingly make surprised faces Yes
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +4
          28 March 2021 12: 09
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          It looks like the fowls have lost their monopoly on "What for us?" and mattresses will now increasingly make surprised faces
          The EU members are also yelling "anaszachto" after China imposed retaliatory sanctions on Europe.
          The personal sanctions imposed on a number of European politicians and experts in Sinology imply a ban on them and their families, employees of related companies and institutions from entering the Middle Kingdom, Hong Kong and Macau from doing business with legal entities in China.
          The demarche of Beijing became a minute of glory for the Lithuanian politician, deputy of the country's parliament, vice-chairman of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance for China, Deauville Shakalene, who managed to get on the Chinese sanctions list. A minute of fleeting glory, attention of journalists and colleagues of compatriots surprised by the international influence.
          1. +2
            28 March 2021 13: 11
            Quote: tihonmarine
            The demarche of Beijing became a minute of glory for the Lithuanian politician, deputy of the country's parliament, vice-chairman of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance for China, Deauville Shakalene, who managed to get on the Chinese sanctions list. A minute of fleeting glory, attention of journalists and colleagues of compatriots surprised by the international influence.

            Let them get used to it, now the reciprocal "buns" will be shipped to them regularly, since barking in the interests of mattresses means barking to the detriment of their interests. hi
          2. +3
            29 March 2021 00: 15
            Quote: tihonmarine
            The demarche of Beijing became a moment of glory for the Lithuanian politician,

            Recently I looked at Russian-language sites like "free Tibet". I noticed that 4 years ago the activity on them dropped to practically zero. Apparently, the Chinese are quite densely wooling such resources in order to track anti-Chinese activities and keep records of all active persons with anti-Chinese sympathies. I would not be surprised that the relatives of this political lady doing business with the PRC will soon face unpleasant problems that adversely affect the profitability of buying Chinese goods and the emergence of strong competitors with amazing discounts from Chinese partners, technical and financial support.
      3. +13
        28 March 2021 08: 25
        Quote: Insurgent
        "It is unacceptable"

        What a charm! Probably the first time the United States got it in the teeth.
        Py.sy. Insurgent! Brilliant translation!
        1. +4
          28 March 2021 14: 18
          For the first time they were raped with the Crimea, so they won't be washed off now.
      4. +11
        28 March 2021 08: 41
        Insurgent, clarification:
        - Kume, the Muscovites are going to beat!
        - Pishli! Ale, check it out, and why will the stench beat us?
        - Huh, what about us?
        Once the international tribunal in The Hague tried to initiate a case against a number of British and American soldiers who simply "rampaged" in Iraq. The accusation of complicity in terrorism was the mildest accusation on the part of the Anglo-Saxons.
        1. +11
          28 March 2021 08: 50
          Quote: knn54
          Insurgent, clarification:
          - Kume, the Muscovites are going to beat!
          - Pishli! Ale, check it out, and why will the stench beat us?
          - Huh, what about us?

          Such an interpretation is also possible, only the PRC is now acting as a goal for the Americans, which is increasingly becoming "too tough for them" ...
      5. +2
        28 March 2021 11: 22
        Quote: Insurgent
        "This is unacceptable", in another version - "What about us?"

        ========
        good Rђ RІRѕS, for that!!! Well done Chinese! drinks
      6. +1
        28 March 2021 12: 03
        Quote: Insurgent
        "It is unacceptable"

        "This is unacceptable" , in another version - "And what about us?" request
        good Synonymous versions of the meme are different.
      7. +3
        28 March 2021 12: 04
        Quote: Insurgent
        "This is unacceptable", in another version - "What about us?"

        But what would, languages ​​less scratched different there "blinkin".
      8. +3
        28 March 2021 15: 31
        Exactly, it's perfect
        unacceptable

        And what about the sanctions for the extermination of Indians, the bombing of Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria, Iraq. Is it permissible or also
        unacceptable
        .
    2. +12
      28 March 2021 08: 08
      The world bully has a surprise on his face from the return received from the Chinese ... but how dare they, they have no right. smile
      The situation is anecdotal ... considering the behavior of our diplomacy.
      I certainly respect Lavrov, but against the background of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, he is in second place.
      Once again I am convinced that the one who is strong in spirit is able to defeat a larger opponent.
      1. +23
        28 March 2021 08: 15
        Quote: Lech from Android.
        I certainly respect Lavrov, but against the background of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, he is in second place.

        Yes. Perhaps there has never been such a public flogging, which was carried out by the Chinese in Anchorage, by the Russian Foreign Ministry in relation to the United States. Yes

        Then Blinken, too, got ...

        1. +3
          28 March 2021 08: 29
          Blinken:
          It is unacceptable. We consider these sanctions to be unfounded.

          More often you look in the mirror, and then whine.
        2. +13
          28 March 2021 08: 36
          Quote: Insurgent
          Yes. Perhaps such a public flogging that the Chinese performed in Anchorage,

          The Chinese are great in this sense. But they not only speak, but, what is more valuable, they do. Just started some Western commercial companies trying to get into political showdowns between the powers and teach the life of China, so they immediately got a must. Now the Chinese are boycotting, tearing up advertising contracts, excluding Adidas, Nike, New Balance, Burberry H&M and others from all electronic trading platforms in the Middle Kingdom. This is very sensitive and painful, the shares of these companies immediately sank to 6%.
        3. +8
          28 March 2021 10: 33
          Quote: Insurgent
          Yes. Perhaps there has never been such a public flogging, which was carried out by the Chinese in Anchorage, by the Russian Foreign Ministry in relation to the United States.

          This is because Safronkov was not allowed to continue his brilliant line of communication with the Anglo-Saxons: "Look at me! Why are you averting your eyes? Don't you dare to offend Russia any more!"
          1. -5
            28 March 2021 10: 57
            Quote: Sarboz
            Safronkov was not allowed to continue his brilliant line of communication with the Anglo-Saxons

            It's amazing how the people react to the verbal skirmish shown on the screen. And then what? A dozen Americans won't be able to visit China ... Yeah. This is problem... laughing
            Did Safronkov's statement decide something? Maybe Bout was released in the USA? Or did the Yankees return to the contract? There are no consequences. Do you want to compare with the Chinese? Start with how thousands of US enterprises have moved to China for decades, where they saved on labor, thereby putting their Faberge into the hands of the Chinese. That's all the opportunity for a public flogging. A formidable skirmish in Anchorage of the same nature. Despite the fact that China itself is actually the largest investor in the United States. But this is already serious ... The State Department was a little foolish. China answered verbally. No more. Relations on the main topics will remain the same.
            1. +8
              28 March 2021 11: 15
              Quote: Hagen
              Relations on the main topics will remain the same.

              You cannot enter the same river twice. Nothing will remain the same. And China's investments in the US national debt will continue to decline, and settlements in national currencies will continue to grow.
              Quote: Hagen
              Did Safronkov's statement decide something?

              And according to Safronkov, the reaction of various liberal media can be used as a litmus test. Once they screamed, then the guy did everything right. Pressed on the desired pain point.
              1. -2
                28 March 2021 11: 22
                Quote: Sarboz
                And China's investments in the US national debt will continue to decline, and settlements in national currencies will continue to grow.

                The tendencies in relations between China and the United States arose long ago and the latest conflicts (those that were shown on TV) will not change much.
                1. +4
                  28 March 2021 11: 25
                  Quote: Hagen
                  The tendencies in relations between China and the United States arose long ago and the latest conflicts (those that were shown on TV) will not change much.

                  That's all right. These trends will only deepen. And these "verbal skirmishes" on TV are just one of the stages of these processes. But the meaning of such words, spoken publicly and officially, should not be underestimated. They do not give the parties an opportunity for the parties to pretend that nothing happened and to back down.
        4. +1
          28 March 2021 12: 14
          Quote: Insurgent
          Then Blinken, too, got ...

          After the Ukrainian Kuleba, another "potskan for whipping" appeared - Blinkin.
      2. -6
        28 March 2021 09: 22
        150 million and 1.5 billion people - this is the weight in world politics.
        1. +4
          28 March 2021 12: 16
          Quote: antivirus
          150 million and 1.5 billion people - this is the weight in world politics.

          Well, at least not 35 million 404's.
          1. -5
            28 March 2021 12: 21
            still need to consider the quality of those 35 or 150 - competence and the will to live on their land, with their own mind, under their government.
      3. +8
        28 March 2021 09: 35
        China has imposed sanctions on the United States, in response they have imposed them in their pants.
      4. +2
        28 March 2021 10: 27
        Well, after the Belarusian congratulations, our foreign ministry doesn’t pull a bronze medal.
      5. -1
        28 March 2021 12: 17
        Quote: Lech from Android.
        the one who is strong in spirit is able to win
        To paraphrase A. Nevsky, we can say that the spirit is not in the strength, but in the truth. The inner conviction of the universality of one's truth and the need to defend it to the end is probably that strength of mind.
    3. -7
      28 March 2021 08: 25
      Quote: antivirus
      I'm happy for Blinken - he reads quickly and gives voice to decisions. and what will be the actions of the state? Wait for the evolution of the regime, as against the USSR?

      China put Blinkind in Lavrov's pose.
      Lavrov is already accustomed to expressing concern and noting inadmissibility with a sad face ...
      And this is still new, well, it will get used to it, there is nowhere to go.

      Here is the difference between China and Russia, very clearly marked ...
    4. +7
      28 March 2021 09: 21
      "This is unacceptable": US Secretary of State reacted to China's imposition of anti-American sanctions
      How unacceptable it is when you have already been imposed and ... introduced! winked
      1. +3
        28 March 2021 12: 20
        Quote: Terenin
        How unacceptable it is when you have already been imposed and ... introduced!

        "Onizhedeti", and the Chinese arranged such a spanking for them that the Yankees screamed all over the world.
    5. 0
      28 March 2021 16: 12
      They can express their concern to China. A very harsh measure.
  2. -7
    28 March 2021 08: 06
    What an interesting time we live in - on the one hand, there is a lot of information and, practically, permissiveness. On the other hand, there are so many mutual sanctions!)))
    1. -6
      28 March 2021 08: 41
      And what are the sanctions? - Well, they forbade two of them to go to China and do business with state-owned companies in China, so they are not cold, they are not hot, they never left America.
      1. -4
        28 March 2021 08: 47
        I'm talking about general!)) laughing
        The USA and Europe are on us, Ukraine is on us, we are on Ukraine, the USA is on China, China is on the USA, China is on Ukraine (soon) and so on))) laughing
      2. +9
        28 March 2021 09: 03
        Quote: evgen1221
        well, two were forbidden to go to China


        China's sanctions list includes:

        Head of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) Gail Manchin,
        USCIRF Vice Chairman Tony Perkins,
        Conservative MP Michael Chong.
        In addition, sanctions included whole subcommittee on International Human Rights of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development of the House of Commons of Canada.

        A little more than two people, and their occupation and position should be taken into account.
        1. -8
          28 March 2021 10: 04
          And what will change? Will the subcommittee dissolve chtoli out of grief? They themselves do not carry dispatches there, but sit in their offices.
          1. +1
            29 March 2021 00: 22
            Quote: evgen1221
            And what will change? Will the subcommittee disband chtoli from grief?

            Surely Western students who decided to become Chinese diplomats tensed. Indeed, active anti-Chinese activity for some of them can nullify all efforts to study the Chinese language, country and culture and force them to retrain to the European direction.
      3. +3
        28 March 2021 12: 22
        Quote: evgen1221
        Well, two of them were forbidden to go to China and do business with state-owned companies in China, so they are not cold, they are not hot, they never left America.

        Is it cold or hot, that's another question, but the fact that the Chinese used a dirty rag "yanik" in the face for a ride is a fact.
  3. +13
    28 March 2021 08: 07
    According to him, the imposition of sanctions against American citizens "because of China's attempts to hide the situation in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region" are "unacceptable." We are talking, in particular, about the measures taken by the PRC against two members of the American commission "on international freedom of religion"

    Well, yes ... Only individuals with "bright", "democratic" faces can impose sanctions. they have it patented, no one else has the right. About genocide, this "mattress" was delivered again ... laughing
  4. +1
    28 March 2021 08: 08
    Pot calls the kettle black...
  5. +4
    28 March 2021 08: 13
    "And what about us?" - Blinken, Psaki, Baydon, etc. are these people generally sane?
    Are they able to speak at least something intelligible without a piece of paper?
  6. +10
    28 March 2021 08: 13
    States continue to lower themselves - not fluff, not a pen.
    1. +10
      28 March 2021 08: 29
      Quote: bald
      States continue to lower themselves - not fluff, not a pen.

      it is so, but where can "poor Ze" go now? If the Chinese have cut short the United States, then what will they do with Ukraine? !!!
      Py.Sy. And in pharmacies diapers are gone! It was necessary to buy for the bedridden patient and .... netuti!
      1. +2
        28 March 2021 09: 34
        They would buy them in India, they won't sell them, Poroshenko insulted the vaccine. We'll have to grow burdocks.
      2. +8
        28 March 2021 09: 49
        Quote: Egoza
        If the Chinese have cut short the United States, then what will they do with Ukraine? !!!

        That horses walked the Europeans - The Chinese authorities blocked the Swedish clothing brand H&M on all possible platforms ... the application of this company disappeared from the stores of Xaiomi, Huawei and Vivo. Baidu and Dianping mobile cards also do not return any results when asked for the names of these Swedish stores. In Hong Kong, it is not possible to scan QR codes from price tags on H&M products in stores. It is also impossible to get to the points of sale of this company when ordering a taxi through the popular DiDi service, since the navigator claims that they do not exist on the map.
        More details: https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2021/03/27/net-v-poiske-kitay-nagluho-zabanil-shvedskiy-brend-odezhdy-hm
        so let them look around ...
      3. +3
        28 March 2021 12: 55
        Quote: Egoza
        Py.Sy. And in pharmacies diapers are gone! It was necessary to buy for the bedridden patient and .... netuti!

        Yes, they were not in the 404th. They got along with a newspaper.
    2. +4
      28 March 2021 09: 31
      Quote: bald
      States continue to lower themselves - not fluff, not a pen.

      Fuck them!

      hi
  7. +8
    28 March 2021 08: 19
    The states are ruled by the weak-minded.
    1. +8
      28 March 2021 09: 32
      Quote: Nikolai Ivanov_5
      The states are ruled by the weak-minded.

      And crazy ...
      1. +4
        28 March 2021 12: 31
        Quote: Terenin
        Quote: Nikolai Ivanov_5
        The states are ruled by the weak-minded.
        And crazy ...
        There, the crazed rule the feeble-minded.
  8. +7
    28 March 2021 08: 28
    China well done, with this international bandit it is necessary, if not harder.
  9. +6
    28 March 2021 08: 29
    Black Lives Matter
    Japanese Live Matter
    Indians Lives Matter
    Iraqis Lives Matter
    .....................
    Stripes, you do not need to be indignant, but on your knees and repent, repent ... repent ...
  10. +8
    28 March 2021 08: 29
    And we are still wondering what will be the 3rd World War ?.
    Here it is, get it. It blazes on all fronts: economic, political, diplomatic, informational, mental.
    And now the main boss, the most (in his own opinion) strongest, the most right of all the right, got a click on the schnobel.
    Slap! Yeah, I didn't like it. Painfully....
    Don't steal (don't fight)))
  11. -15
    28 March 2021 08: 39
    These two were very scared of the ban on visiting China. There is no word about economic sanctions. So why are we happy.? Well, we did two more non grata.
    1. +11
      28 March 2021 08: 47
      Quote: evgen1221
      So why are we happy.?

      And who is happy? Just laughing ... But Blinken is kind of outraged. And why was he so indignant. if it's all nonsense? Or are they already offended by any trifle? Then they all go to the doctor for an appointment, because it smells of pathology. request
    2. +4
      28 March 2021 08: 57
      These two were very scared of the ban on visiting China.

      Maybe these two were the curators in China? )))) And the rest is just a cover.
      1. -5
        28 March 2021 10: 02
        That does not negate the fact that in China on earth they do not work and do not carry dispatches there themselves, so what will they get sick of from the fact that they are not allowed to go to China? They were not going there personally nirazu.
    3. +6
      28 March 2021 09: 33
      Quote: evgen1221
      Well, we did two more non grata.

      Well, they did it!
      1. -5
        28 March 2021 10: 02
        And what has changed?
        1. +10
          28 March 2021 10: 10
          Quote: evgen1221
          And what has changed?

          Why then react like that?
          1. -4
            28 March 2021 11: 15
            Well, in this case, the chat reacts very nervously, I'm not the one who dashed off so many cons.
            1. +4
              28 March 2021 11: 17
              Quote: evgen1221
              Well, in this case, the chat reacts very nervously, I'm not the one who dashed off so many cons.

              Eugene, what's the chat laughing , I meant - the US Secretary of State ... drinks
  12. +5
    28 March 2021 08: 40
    China will ask "OladushkEn" what is acceptable and what is not? Wait!winked Nicely, they poke the mattresses into their bleach with their muzzle. Even enviable. It is a pity that we do not have such opportunities yet.
  13. +6
    28 March 2021 08: 45
    So we need to take an example from the Chinese in relation to striped and their mongrels. And Blinkin ........, well, Blikin, let him bark, his tongue has no bones, you just have to treat him like an empty place, absolutely nothing.
  14. +5
    28 March 2021 08: 48
    In China, in turn, they said that the United States needs to pay more attention to the genocide that they committed in their country and which they continue to organize in the world.


    And more often to poke their noses into it, let them admire ...
    1. +6
      28 March 2021 09: 14
      Quote: cniza
      In China, in turn, they said that the United States needs to pay more attention to the genocide that they committed in their country and which they continue to organize in the world.


      And more often to poke their noses into it, let them admire ...

      Yes, indeed, in economic leadership they are kirdyk. If someone else in the military "shod" them, then absolutely melancholy winked

      Greetings, Vitya hi
      1. +2
        28 March 2021 13: 03
        Good day! hi

        And in the military, they can only with the weak, or at a distance ...
        1. +3
          28 March 2021 15: 21
          Quote: cniza
          Good day! hi

          And in the military, they can only with the weak, or at a distance ...

          Yeah, in the bombing of wedding, buried processions, or in hospitals ... they have no equal No.
          1. +2
            28 March 2021 18: 16
            And after all, their conscience does not torment them, and then they begin to point out to others ...
  15. +5
    28 March 2021 08: 57
    It looks like they were bitten by the Hoh-ly
  16. +6
    28 March 2021 09: 16
    Rzhu nimagu, cool uncle))) when mattress makers impose sanctions, on business or not - that's right, this is smoke))) when retaliatory sanctions are introduced, this is unacceptable)))
  17. +3
    28 March 2021 09: 25
    Quote: dorz
    Quote: Insurgent
    "It is unacceptable"

    "This is unacceptable" , in another version - "And what about us?" request


    For objectivity: oil supplies from Russia to the United States in 2020 averaged 538 barrels per day, which is even more than imports from Saudi Arabia. Now Russian oil is actively ordered by the American Exxon Mobil, Chevron and Valero Energy.

    Russia takes advantage of the sanctions against Venezuela and makes money on them, in fact, supporting the sanctions regime. So is the Russian Federation a sovereign power or a gas station selling to everyone who pays?

    One would think that Russia's refusal to sell oil to the United States, would change something, would buy from other countries or steal from Syria in large quantities. Until the world gets rid of the dollar dependence, which means the US diktat, the real world order will be preserved.
    We are imposed by sanctions, no one has stopped trading with the United States because of this. Russia is already helping Venezuela like no other country. Where are you nowadays, but right now you should have become president, but it didn’t grow together and didn’t grow together thanks to Russia.
  18. +2
    28 March 2021 09: 31
    It resembles the screams of a beaten lawless man ..
  19. +1
    28 March 2021 09: 48
    "This is unacceptable": US Secretary of State reacted to China's imposition of anti-American sanctions
    ... No other way? Bash on bash .... normal answer.
  20. +1
    28 March 2021 09: 49
    these impose sanctions and it is supposedly normal when it is unacceptable against them. pissing mattress does not confuse anything? or their politics is as dumb as their new president
  21. -2
    28 March 2021 09: 52
    Now, if China stops supplying toilet paper to Canada and the United States, these will be real unacceptable sanctions. in a month before China they will crawl on all fours and China does not care about them.
  22. -3
    28 March 2021 10: 50
    while the shaves and the united states make electronics for the whole world the world does according to their patents until they are sunk!
    1. -1
      28 March 2021 11: 45
      This means that all Chinese sanctions against Canada and the United States are fake. Just think two mattresses will not be allowed to China
  23. +2
    28 March 2021 10: 54
    We are talking, in particular, about two members of the American commission "on international freedom of religion"

    What is it “on international freedom of religion”? And is the advancement of democracy here, or do they want to wrap the Chinese in another religion?
  24. -3
    28 March 2021 12: 10
    It is unacceptable. We consider these sanctions to be unfounded.

    Well done Chinese! They are not particularly balabolic and respond immediately and sharply to statements humiliating in their address .. Russia would be so, but alas, thank God, our economy is not so tightly tied to the Amers, as in China .. Let them butt there and this is a temporary relief for Russia! The caravan is moving, the dogs are barking ..
  25. +2
    28 March 2021 13: 33
    And what, the Chinese do not have their own Zakharova to dance in response to the Americans, right? Poor people .. have to answer like a man .. without any non-mirrored answers. This is not Russia with its Jewish leadership, always striving to eat a fish and sit on a well-known subject for your pleasure ..
  26. 0
    28 March 2021 16: 36
    And what will China do? Will not sell your miracle products? Will he recall all Chinese and half-breeds from foreign countries? Scared, damn it.
    1. 0
      28 March 2021 20: 38
      And they will lay claim to railways in the USA ...)) - In the end, did the Chinese build them? ))
  27. +1
    28 March 2021 17: 46
    Change China to the United States in Blinkin's screams and everything will fall into place ...
  28. 0
    28 March 2021 18: 45
    "And what for us ???"
  29. +1
    28 March 2021 19: 14
    Well, of course: to impose sanctions is only the exclusive right.
  30. 0
    28 March 2021 19: 46
    Good Chinese mirror answer! Better than 101 expressions of concern and 207 "last Chinese warning" from the Russian Foreign Ministry!
  31. +1
    29 March 2021 04: 40
    You read and listen to these "tovarische" and immediately a joke comes to mind - "....... but what for us !?" On the edge of the coast, penguins beguiled., Stubbornly continue to believe in their "exclusivity".
  32. +1
    29 March 2021 08: 44
    It seems that, as many journalists and activists of various persuasions in Russia do not want, Russia cannot escape from China, like the latter, from Russia in the current conditions.
    The task of NATO and the United States, in particular, is to separate the Russian Federation from China at any cost, or even better - to set one against the other.
    This is necessary so that in the near future, when the United States winds up world hysteria against the alleged military and political threats of Russia and China for the United States and the EU, at a certain moment, with the help of an "instant (quick and disarming) strike", destroy our country or China separately.
    To do this, if they succeed, then attacking Russia, China will sit quietly and simply worry in words, while our army and country are destroyed economically and militarily (hypothetically) and vice versa ...
    But, they are unlikely to succeed. Even the cunning Chinese understand that they cannot stand alone against the United States and NATO. Even the need for hydrocarbons and supplies of various raw materials and food from the Russian Federation under the conditions of sanctions and restrictions from the United States and their other bedding can lead to a terrible shortage in China, if, suddenly, the United States manages to tear the Russian Federation away from China.
    Therefore, the only way out, as was the case 100 and 200 years ago, is to achieve more trusting (inevitably) relations in the field of economics, defense and politics between our country and China mutually.
    Only the formation of a powerful military-political bloc against NATO and their "friends" will make the world and Russia's independence more secure.
    If China together with the Russian Federation support each other: the Russian Federation China in the supply of all raw materials and other funds of the Russian Federation, in the unconditional support of the Russian Federation in all good general issues.
    But, ultimately, knowing the insidious Chinese, the Russian Federation must continue to strengthen its air defense and missile defense, strike capabilities, the economy in the face of the most severe sanctions, the severance of all relations with other countries, and China and other countries of the new bloc lock in on itself and other countries.
    I don’t believe that the United States, after the uncontested military response of the Russian Federation to the offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Donbass, will not lower the iron curtain between us, the EU and itself, tearing off everything that is possible ... without it, the United States will soon not be a single state with convertible paper ... oh ... currency.
  33. +1
    29 March 2021 11: 52
    The Imperial Chancellery was outraged.
  34. 0
    29 March 2021 15: 06
    I do not quite understand why the PRC has enough strength and will to impose sanctions, but we do not. Yes, yes, I am an amateur. But I don’t understand. The Yankees climbed into the same Syria - why not impose sanctions for this, and not against two and a half diggers, but - tough ones? Say, refuse to cooperate in an area of ​​interest to them. Until the last US citizen leaves Syria. They put conditional F-35s in the conditional Poland - well, fly into space on your rockets. We will no longer supply you with engines or take on board astronauts. We clearly lack political will.
    1. 0
      29 March 2021 18: 25
      You are right, but greed does not give, the desire to make a profit, and for her his own mother will be sold.
  35. 0
    29 March 2021 18: 23
    The US apparently believes that sanctions can only be imposed on them.
    You don't have to go into someone else's garden and they won't come to you.
  36. -1
    29 March 2021 18: 37
    Is Blinken Ukrainian by any chance?
    1. -1
      29 March 2021 18: 42
      Well, why the hell to change the word h.ohol to "Ukrainian"? Do you think they are not already?
      So do not insult the Negros.
      So you will soon write that on the head of a parrot Karella is not a hohol, but a Ukrainian.
      Be ashamed of the site moderator. We have here "Voennoe obozreniye", not a site on tolerance.
  37. 0
    30 March 2021 22: 33
    It's just a pleasure to read. "Inadmissible!" "Unreasonable!" You can shake a test tube and ruin an entire country under this case. You can also burn people with napalm and water the jungle with defoliants. String the cut off ears on the antennas of the armored personnel carrier - for God's sake. Herach rockets a peaceful country in the center of Europe is welcome. And to put in place the presumptuous "exclusivity" - "unacceptable")). I hope that China has not forgotten the employees of its embassy killed by American missiles in Belgrade and will not miss the opportunity to pay.)
  38. 0
    31 March 2021 08: 56
    China, a definite plus. The bite is small, but offensive. In Tanya, the "crown" reeled on the heads of the aborigines.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"