Hitler's plans for the United States

20
Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Adolf Hitler began their political careers at about the same time, generously promising radical reforms to their voters to bring their countries out of crisis.

Hitler knew very little about the United States of America. Early ideas were based on the background of political gossip, which he overheard in pubs and restaurants, and also read in newspapers. In the thirties, he maintained acquaintance with people who deserved his trust, who often visited the American continent. One of them was Kurt Ludeke. Driving around the States, Kurt found out that German Americans and members of the Ku Klux Klan did not want to support the Nazis. He also concluded that there are almost no cultural traditions of their own in America, Americans are convinced that their army is invincible, and among them there is a strong influence of the Jews who seized Wall Street. Hitler listened to his conclusions, as well as the stories of Ernst Ganfshtenglya, choosing from them only what seemed important to him. Freedom of speech, the dominance of the Jews, capitalist materialism, he clearly did not like him. Why, he just despised Americans.

“Americans,” declared Hitler, “are people with chicken brains. This country is a house of cards, built on a shaky foundation of material well-being. Americans live like pigs, albeit in a very luxurious pigsty. ”


He considered an irreparable mistake, the departure to America of millions of Germans, who, in his opinion, made up the backbone of the whole nation.

Hitler declared: “To the East, and only to the East the eyes of our race should be directed; nature itself shows us this way. Strength of character is forged only in a healthy climate. Transfer the German to Kiev, and he will remain a real German. Transfer him to Miami, and he will become a degenerate, in other words, an American. ”


The only thing that fascinated Hitler was the achievements of the American automobile industry and architecture. The Embassy in America regularly sent him photographs of various city structures. He admired Henry Ford, Volkswagen was founded in imitation.
In the early thirties, the United States of America did not pose any threat to Germany, so in historical There is no clear evidence in the documents that Adolf Hitler was planning a war with the United States.

In April, 1939, Hitler stated that “rumors circulated everywhere that Germany is about to attack or occupy America are the most common fakes and coarse lies. Such rumors, if viewed from a military point of view, can only be generated by a sick imagination. ”


However, it should not be forgotten that the main goal of fascist German imperialism is the conquest of supremacy throughout the world. Germany successfully used separate lightning campaigns with long pauses to restore and increase strength due to the defeated enemy. The fascist German leadership had a clear and precise strategic concept of world war. Analysis of the documents of the Wehrmacht reveals some successive stages of its implementation.

1. The capture of the small countries of Europe in order to improve the strategic and economic position of Germany for the subsequent war.
2. The defeat of France and England in order to capture Western Europe and build up the industrial power of the new empire.
3. The defeat of the Soviet Union and complete domination in Europe.
4. The conquest of Africa, the Middle East, Australia.
5. Capture of the USA.

The final goals of the fascists were delivered by Reichsfuhrer SS Himmler in October 1943: “By the end of this war, when Russia will eventually become exhausted or will be eliminated, and England and America will not endure war, the task of creating a world empire will arise for us. The war is being waged in order to establish the German world empire. This is the meaning of war, no matter how long it lasts - five, or maybe six or even seven years. ”

Tensions between the US and Germany escalated into a “cold war” after the Nazis occupied Prague in March 1939. Of course, the Führer knew perfectly well that in the event of war, the United States would stand up for European countries, and perhaps they would provide economic assistance.

In 1941, Hitler wrote to Mussolini that "behind the backs of two great powers (Great Britain and the Soviet Union) the United States is hiding, and they are not at all inactive."


Nevertheless, Hitler was convinced that the United States would not participate in the war in Europe, and its help was only a cover, hiding America’s own imperial ambitions. He had a very dismissive opinion about the American army. Showing off to the Japanese in April 1941 of the year, Hitler said that the German soldier, without a doubt, is much better than the American, and not a single Yankee will be able to set foot on European soil.

Some sources claim that Hitler began preparations for a war with the United States, back in the thirties, by ordering the Messerschmitt plant to develop aircraft capable of long flights without refueling. The best of these was the ME-264, which could cross the Atlantic. Unfortunately, there was not enough fuel on the way home. Think of Hitler to attack the US, and the September 11 tragedy could well have happened at that time.

However, it is impossible not to deny the fact that German spies in America constantly conducted ideological subversive activities aimed at destroying society from the inside. It is possible that Hitler hatched the idea of ​​a revolution in the States. Special sabotage groups made plans to destroy the largest enterprises for the production of military equipment. Very high was the activity of Germany in Latin America. The Germans constantly tried to discredit the States in the eyes of South Americans. Conducted powerful propaganda in Brazil, Peru, Chile, Ecuador and Uruguay. Brazil, located near the Panama Canal, at the sea gates of Peru, could be used as the central base of the Germans. From a secret map obtained by American intelligence, it became known that Germany wanted to create 14 vassal states from the 5 countries of Latin America. Although, maybe this is just fiction.

In November 1940, Hitler was interested in the Azores. "This is the only base for attacking the United States," he explained. “From here, long-range bombers could take off for strikes on US territory.”


His attention was attracted by Iceland, which could be used as a transit point in the Atlantic Ocean. But, in anticipation of this, the Americans placed military units on the island.

When the war with the Soviet Union began, President Roosevelt declared that the defense of the USSR was a vital necessity for the defense of the United States. He informed Churchill of his intention to welcome Russia as an ally. A similar position was supported by wide sections of the English and American peoples. At the end of 1941, the Japanese defeated Pearl Harbor, and on December 11, Germany declared war on the United States. From this point on, all German propaganda begins to work to blacken the United States, the American leadership, and in particular Roosevelt.

“This is a country in decline, torn apart by racial and social inequality. I like Europe a thousand times more. America only makes me hate and disgust, a semi-Jewish, semi-Negro country, where everything is based on the power of the dollar, ”said Hitler in 1942 year.


But the main blow of the Germans was nevertheless directed at the Soviet Union, and while the issue with the Russians was not resolved, he left the Japanese and his the fleet. It is worth noting that the Fuhrer was never an admirer of the naval forces of his power and did not understand its problems. He believed that the role of the navy is only to support ground operations. The commander of the entire German submarine fleet, Karl Dönitz, said that for the Fuhrer, the war at sea was incomprehensible and terrible.

The Fuhrer himself admitted: "On land, I am a hero; at sea, I am a coward."


While in the European stronghold, Hitler hoped that the war with Japan in the Pacific would distract the main forces of the Americans and reduce their defenses. Therefore, sea problems did not bother him. In the Atlantic Ocean, the entire burden of the war with America fell on the shoulders of German sailors. And the German fleet was not ready for it, as it was considered a secondary branch of troops. All the admirals' requests for military operations and attacks on the supply of goods, a continuous stream coming from the US to Europe, Hitler forbade, because he was afraid to provoke the United States to respond. And then the well-known Operation Overlord followed the landing of the Allied forces in Normandy and the opening of the Western Front. The war with the United States ended with the capitulation of Germany in 1945, a week after the death of the leaders of both countries - Hitler and Roosevelt. The Fuhrer’s plans for America were never developed and implemented. The accusation of Germany in the attack on the United States was considered unproven.
Hitler's Secret Plan: Attack on America (Germany) 2005 Year

Director: Christoph Weber

Hitler's delusions of grandeur knew no bounds: from the very beginning of World War II, Nazi military strategists were developing plans to attack the United States. The bravest of them suggested a massive raid on New York by German fighter planes, which, as "live bombs", were to crash into the skyscrapers of Manhattan. The world experienced the full horror of such an attack more than fifty years later, 9 September 2001. Hitler considered New York to be the "epicenter of the Jewish capitalist conspiracy" and wanted to destroy it.

With the help of eyewitness accounts and archival materials, the program tells how the US government became aware of the secret intentions of Hitler and managed to prevent their implementation.

20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +18
    25 August 2012 10: 49
    It is a pity that the United States is on another continent of the planet .......... would be in Europe and fully experienced the "charm" of fascism on its own skin ......... look and it was not to the policy they are pursuing now !!! IMHO
    1. Morgan stanley
      +1
      25 August 2012 13: 28
      Quote: Apollon
      It is a pity that the United States is on another continent of the planet .......... would be in Europe and fully experienced the "charm" of fascism on its own skin ......... look and it was not to the policy they are pursuing now !!! IMHO

      Perhaps ... But, politics, it is like that.
    2. Taratut
      +3
      25 August 2012 16: 58
      Quote: Apollon
      It is a pity that the United States is on another continent of the planet .......... would be in Europe and fully experienced the "charm" of fascism on its own skin ......... would be the policy they are pursuing now!

      Well, let's say the United States would be in Europe. And England, too, is on the continent.
      Would they kirdyk.
      In 1939, the United States had 10 combat-ready divisions and 200 obsolete tanks.
      Just explain - the defeat of the United States and England to us that would be on hand, huh?
      Are you capable of calculating at least two moves ahead?
      1. Morgan stanley
        -1
        25 August 2012 17: 33
        Quote: Taratut
        Just explain - the defeat of the United States and England to us that would be on hand, huh?

        Yes. Because most of the losses Germany suffered from the USSR just the same. Hitler needed 150 00 soldiers to take England, when for the war with the USSR they were sent much more than 10 times at least. The USSR would then have a clear superiority in the world, in everything. Everyone would obey him, and there would be a unipolar world led by the USSR.
        1. Taratut
          0
          25 August 2012 18: 30
          I do not quite understand.
          That is, Hitler, having defeated the USA and England (and having received their resources) would attack the USSR and still lose? And then the USSR would become the only superpower?
          I got it roughly right?
          You are an optimist. This I found the least offensive definition.
          1. Morgan stanley
            +1
            25 August 2012 22: 48
            He would not have captured England and the United States quickly, so then the war would have been on 2 fronts. Therefore, the USSR would have won, the USSR had a clear advantage in everything, just some "commanders" at first could not give commands that would have saved the USSR from such a defeat at the beginning.
            1. Taratut
              0
              26 August 2012 09: 20
              Quote: MorganStanley
              He would not capture England and the USA quickly

              Oh really?
              We admitted that they are in Europe. Their armies are small, the fleet in this case is useless.
              Hitler would have defeated them like France, very quickly. The territory saved us.

              Quote: MorganStanley
              Therefore, the USSR would have won, the USSR had a clear advantage in everything

              What is this?

              Quote: MorganStanley
              just some "commanders" at first could not give commands that would have saved the USSR from such a defeat at the beginning.

              Who is this, Stalin?
              1. Morgan stanley
                0
                26 August 2012 16: 44
                Quote: Taratut
                Oh really?
                We admitted that they are in Europe. Their armies are small, the fleet in this case is useless.
                Hitler would have defeated them like France, very quickly. The territory saved us.

                For the USA, one more piece needs to be stamped to Europe, otherwise it would not work out if they were in Europe. France has a different case.
                Quote: Taratut
                What is this?

                Human resources, natural resources, and of course technology, there were many more tanks.
                Quote: Taratut
                Who is this, Stalin?

                ... Stalin gave the order to repel attacks, not everything depends on Stalin, as on those commanders who are at the front, so they set foot.
                1. Taratut
                  0
                  26 August 2012 17: 37
                  Quote: MorganStanley
                  Human resources, natural resources, and of course technology, there were many more tanks

                  We spent the resources.
                  The advantage in tanks has melted in a month.

                  Quote: MorganStanley
                  Stalin gave the order to repel attacks, not so everything depends on Stalin

                  He never gave the order to begin the cover operation.
        2. 0
          29 August 2012 10: 44
          Morgan stanley,
          Germans started the war seems with 3 soldiers in total.
  2. Taratut
    0
    25 August 2012 12: 18
    Back in the late twenties, in a conversation with friends, Hitler said - "We lost the war because the US was not on our side."
    Hitler did not despise America. Respected and feared.
    Another thing is that he hated democracy, tolerance for black people, etc. He believed that these abnormal qualities of Americans imposed by the Jews.
    The military attaché assured Hitler - "American generals are excellent guys. They will not fight Germany. If the Jewish gang in the leadership orders them, they will show who is boss."
    Indeed, after the occupation of Czechoslovakia, the attitude towards Germany became hostile. Public opinion quickly drifted from indifference to hatred.
  3. Brother Sarych
    +10
    25 August 2012 13: 48
    Only the assertion that Roosevelt and Schicklgruber began their careers at the same time is already enough to not take the article seriously ...
    Roosevelt was elected to the Senate in 1910, when Adolf himself had no idea what he wanted to do ...
  4. Taratut
    -2
    25 August 2012 16: 56
    Hitler had no concrete plans for America.
    But, of course, if Hitler had gotten to Europe, the US situation would have become difficult.
    1. rock09
      0
      25 August 2012 17: 36
      of course they were, Hitler thought a lot ahead and that killed him
      1. Taratut
        +2
        25 August 2012 18: 33
        Quote: rock09
        of course they were, Hitler thought a lot ahead and that killed him


        At the Nuremberg trials, a special investigation was devoted to this issue.
        Nothing was found.
        In addition to these pairs of statements about what the United States might someday get to.
        If you have any evidence of Hitler’s plans, consider that you are already a millionaire. This is a sensation.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +1
        2 February 2014 14: 58
        Quote: rock09
        Of course they were, Hitler thought a lot ahead
        Well, not so much thinking as dreaming. It is this small but significant difference and
        ruined him
  5. +1
    25 August 2012 19: 22
    They published secret cards that were previously in the archives.

    Actually, there were several options for enslaving America. According to one version, the Nazis were going to crush the British fleet in 1942, and warships would sail from Great Britain towards America.

    The second option suggested that Hitler’s troops first invade and gain a foothold in Norfolk, Virginia (in the eastern United States) and wait for the Japanese reinforcements. And then the combined German-Japanese fleet was supposed to capture the United States, moving from the Canary and Azores.

    The third plan was designed to get to America through Iceland, Greenland and Canada.

    The fourth option considered the possibility of an attack from Latin America. In this case, the Japanese had to start bombing the Panama Canal, and then they would land troops on land and move to the states via Ecuador.

    The last fifth option as a springboard for a military base was chosen by the Hawaiian Islands, where after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, Japanese and German troops were to be stationed.
    1. Taratut
      +1
      25 August 2012 19: 41
      You know, when Hitler declared war on the United States, the OKW received a request regarding plans for a war with the United States. There, they were bewilderedly answered that no one had built such plans.
      And the versions are as many as you like.
      If Hitler the English Channel did not dare to cross, where is it with the Atlantic. And the British would drown the fleet.
      1. +1
        26 August 2012 12: 09
        Quote: Taratut
        If Hitler the English Channel did not dare to cross, where is it with the Atlantic.

        This is no secret for a long time, one hundred and quite significant reason for refusing to war with England is the lack of a sufficient number of transport vessels! And the diversion of resources, the construction of ships could greatly affect the Wehrmacht!
        Hitler’s position in relation to the major operation "Sea Lion", the purpose of which was the invasion of England. On July 26, 1940, the first meeting began on the preparation of this operation, which was attended by Keitel, Jodl, Raeder, Todt and others. Himmler, who was informed of the meeting, told me that he had originally planned to use thirty to forty divisions for the offensive, but then reduced their number to fifteen, which were supposed to strike the British Isles from the Dunkirk area of ​​Cherbourg. The number of vehicles requested by the command of the ground forces reached a total of four thousand ships — landing craft, tugboats, and transport ships.

        http://vimpel-v.com/besopasnost/special/germany/labirint/labirint_16.shtml
        1. Taratut
          0
          26 August 2012 13: 19
          Right. Now imagine that the Wehrmacht was put on ships (where else to get them - the British will certainly drown them) and sent to America. How much will you swim? Half? This is at best. And how to supply the group across the Atlantic?
          1. +1
            26 August 2012 22: 04
            Quote: Taratut
            Right. Now imagine that the Wehrmacht was put on ships (where else to get them - the British will certainly drown them) and sent to America. How much will you swim? Half? This is at best. And how to supply the group across the Atlantic?

            You are forgotten dear !!!
            The Wehrmacht at one time was the best army in the world and their fleet was not sailing !!!
            1. Taratut
              0
              27 August 2012 09: 29
              Quote: APASUS
              You forget dear

              How did I offend you?

              Quote: APASUS
              The Wehrmacht at one time was the best army in the world

              He was generally the best army in the world. So what?

              Quote: APASUS
              and their fleet was not sailing!


              Not sailing. But low-power.
              EVEN FIND A HITLER HUNDREDS OF TRANSPORT FOR TRANSPORTATION OF TROOPS - THEY ARE VULNERABLE DURING VOYAGE.
              How to cover them? Aviation? She has a small range. But there are no aircraft carriers. But there is the United States.
              Submarines?
              But their strength is in sudden attacks.
              They cannot cover hundreds of transports.
              Half of the swimmers are still optimistic. Most likely, the best army in the world will remain at the bottom.
  6. SoVIet ZiMBo_O
    +4
    25 August 2012 21: 32
    It’s never too late for Europe to regain its former power by bringing the United States to its knees, fetters from all its satellites will fall, and Germany, Russia, France, Italy are great countries and if they begin to pursue an independent policy, it will certainly come sideways for the States, but Asia will now not the same as before, you need to take this into account. And as for the cries, there will be no global economy without the USA, then this is pure nonsense, a story without the United States is much more than a story with this colony country, but wait and see.
    1. Morgan stanley
      -1
      26 August 2012 00: 34
      Quote: SoVIet ZiMBo_O

      It’s never too late for Europe to regain its former power by bringing the United States to its knees, fetters from all its satellites will fall, and Germany, Russia, France, Italy are great countries and if they begin to pursue an independent policy, it will certainly come sideways for the States, but Asia will now not the same as before, you need to take this into account. And as for the cries, there will be no global economy without the USA, then this is pure nonsense, a story without the United States is much more than a story with this colony country, but wait and see.

      So I think so. It is necessary to conclude a new agreement between the Russian Federation, France, Germany, China, and if of course the WB is possible, as additional state leaders in Brazil, Canada, India, Japan, Australia and South Africa, on military-political-economic security in the world, t .e. abandon the dollar, create a completely new model of the economy, a pact to end the war for resources and influence (and immediately determine who is behind what). This is the only way to get rid of the United States and its policies.
      1. -1
        26 August 2012 14: 09
        to Morgan stanley
        And after 30 years, everything will return to normal only this time with China at the head. The world economy depends on the United States not only because of the dollar, but also because the United States is the main consumer of food and goods on the planet. Unlike China, which in the near future will not be able to close in the domestic market, the United States has this opportunity. The third country in the world in terms of population after India and China, but with a developed industry and a large amount of natural resources, will be able to tighten their belts and gradually begin to work in isolation relying only on the domestic market, but what will happen in the rest of the world, which roughly works on US consumer? If the whole of Europe, Russia and the BV buy product X 5 times less than the United States, that is, 80% goes overseas, then if the states isolate, the entire industry associated with product X will be covered with a copper basin.
        An example is aluminum and everything that is made of it, the USA practically does not touch the Bauxite deposits on its territory and prefers to buy. Aluminum ranks first in terms of turnover among non-ferrous metals, hundreds of thousands of jobs, and while there is no alternative, all these enterprises will continue to work with the United States.
        If we make leveling, then we need to create an economy and a consumer base that can compete with the United States, for example, the European Union will expand its wings or China, and stupid transitions to rubles and yuan, economic unions and so on will not change anything.
        1. Morgan stanley
          +1
          26 August 2012 16: 50
          What do you want everyone to be equal ??? Naturally there will be a leader in the economy. The United States will be replaced by China, which has a much larger population. The United States itself will bend if it introduces itself into isolation, since goods in China are cheaper to make than in the USA. To solve the problem of consumption, you can increase the purchasing power of the countries of Africa, Asia and South America, China and India alone are worth what, there will be an ideal replacement.
          1. +1
            26 August 2012 17: 21
            We are probably talking about the same thing =) I consider treaties, free trade zones, transitions to another currency and other measures that would quickly, within 5-7 years, replace the United States would not work. For some reason, many are convinced that the United States is the first economy in the world because it owns a money machine, and in fact because the world economy is tied to them, and until they are replaced absolutely do not care what currency they are selling and goods and services are dripping from them, US dollars , yuan or rubles.
            As for bending, everything depends not on the population, but on the potential of the domestic market and production, in Indonesia the population is like in the USA, but I don’t think that they can build several thousand plants and factories in a short time to compensate for the reduced import of goods, the same and with India e.g. IMHO ...
    2. Taratut
      0
      26 August 2012 10: 49
      Quote: SoVIet ZiMBo_O
      It's never too late for Europe to regain its former power by bringing the United States to its knees

      Some kind of perverse thinking. Why should Europe bring the US to its knees?
    3. +1
      2 February 2014 15: 09
      Quote: SoVIet ZiMBo_O
      Germany, Russia, France, Italy are great countries
      Germany and Russia - I still agree, France - with a big reservation, but Italy ... Only in the field of culture, perhaps (painting and opera are really at their best).
  7. +1
    25 August 2012 22: 28
    History has no subjunctive moods. This future is multivariate, and the past is one. And only historians can describe opposing so-called truths. Sincerely.
  8. Svyatoslav
    0
    26 August 2012 04: 11
    It is terrible to admit it, but Hitler had the right thoughts in relation to the USA.
    1. Taratut
      0
      26 August 2012 09: 23
      Quote: Svyatoslav
      It’s scary to admit it, but Hitler had the right thoughts in relation to the USA

      And what were his thoughts?
      He hoped for US isolationism. What will they say - yes, let them in Europe themselves understand each other.
      But on his misfortune and our happiness, America was led by the wise Roosevelt.
      Which immediately saw through Hitler and did not sign any Covenants with him.
  9. +1
    26 August 2012 14: 28
    We, as always, were not ready for war:
    By World War I, only by 1916/1917;
    By the second, only by the middle of 1942.
    And the implementation of the Sea Lion plan would give the USSR a respite. But without the consent of Spain (the capture of Giblartar and further to the Suez Canal), this plan was futile. As for the United States, which at one time financed Hitler's coming to power. then they were able to completely reformat the world, because because of the patriotic position of the Bolsheviks, they failed to do this after the First World War.
    In fact, only the United States (more precisely, the Federal Reserve Service) proved to be the winners (in the sense of implementing plans) in this war. After all, $ finally became the world currency.
    1. Taratut
      0
      26 August 2012 17: 40
      Quote: knn54
      the implementation of the Sea Lion plan would give the USSR a respite

      I mean, a respite?
      Well, Hitler would spend an extra two weeks. So what?
      But we would lose allies at all. And no second front.
  10. Voin sveta82
    +1
    26 August 2012 15: 34
    yes ... interesting ... if Hitler would start a war with the USA ... what would end the Second World .. ?? )))
    1. Charon
      +1
      26 August 2012 17: 34
      Hitler's victory.
    2. Taratut
      0
      26 August 2012 17: 40
      And he began.
      Hitler declared war on the United States.
      1. Charon
        0
        26 August 2012 19: 40
        Germany’s charge of assaulting the United States was found unproven.
        1. Taratut
          0
          26 August 2012 20: 10
          Quote: Charon
          Germany's charge of assault on the US was found unproven

          What attack? I mean that Hitler declared war on America.
  11. +1
    27 August 2012 20: 39
    But the fact that the German soldier of that time was better than American Hitler was right. And the war on the Western Front confirmed this in its entirety ... In particular, it was noticeable in the first months - the battles in Normandy and northern France. But Americans learned fast. This quality they do not hold ...
    However, this is a matter of bygone days. Although you should not forget about it in any way! ..

    And as for the present, our days ... I must say that I have a rather strong impression that the current German leadership does not favor the American administration and the policies it pursues. The same can be said of official London ...
    What is this? .. Political pragmatism? .. A new course? .. The desire to take a leading position in Europe? .. Or does the original German mentality play its role here? ..
    The answers to these questions are most likely known only to Mrs. Merkel and her inner circle ... However, the future will show ...
    1. Taratut
      0
      28 August 2012 08: 29
      Quote: Chicot 1
      But the fact that the German soldier of that time was better than American Hitler was right

      The German soldier was better than the Soviet and English.
      But he should not be set to impossible tasks.
    2. +2
      2 February 2014 15: 14
      Quote: Chicot 1
      But the fact that the German soldier of that time was better than American Hitler was right.
      The best German soldier then was only a Soviet one. Which proved in 1945!